3386 Guinea-Bissau SLM Terminal

3386 Guinea-Bissau SLM Terminal

La REPUBLIC OF GUINEA-BISSAU MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES (MAF) ------------------------ Support to the Building of Guinea-Bissau’s National Capacity in Sustainable Land Management and Desertification Control FINAL EVALUATION OF THE CAPACITY BUILDING PROJECT IN SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT AND DESERTIFICATION CONTROL Final Version Consultants Roger SOUBEIGA, Socio - Economist January 2013 and Project Analyst 0 6 B P : 9 3 1 7 Table of Contents COVER PAGE ................................................................................................................................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 5 ACRYNOYMS AND ABREVIATIONS................................................................................................. 9 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Objective...................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Scope of activity and method ...................................................................................................... 10 1.2.1 Scope of activity ................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Method ................................................................................................................................. 10 1.3 Difficulties Encountered and Limits of the Study .................................................................... 11 1.3.1 Difficulties Encountered ....................................................................................................... 11 1.3.2 Limits of the study ................................................................................................................ 11 1.4 Structure of the evaluation report .............................................................................................. 11 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ........................................................ 12 2.1 Start of Project and Duration ...................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Problems that the Project Sought to Address ............................................................................. 12 2.3 Immediate and Development Objectives of the Project ............................................................. 12 2.3.1 Development Objective ........................................................................................................ 12 2.3.2 Immediate Objective ............................................................................................................ 12 2.4 Established Reference Indicators ................................................................................................ 12 2.5 Principal Stakeholders ................................................................................................................. 13 2.6 Expected results .......................................................................................................................... 13 3. OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 13 3.1 Project design/formulation ......................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Analysis of the Logical Framework Approach of the Project ............................................... 13 3.1.2 Assumptions and risks .......................................................................................................... 14 3.1.3 Lessons from other similar projects that were integrated into project design ................... 15 3.1.4 Planned participation of stakeholders ................................................................................. 15 3.1.5 Approach for replication ...................................................................................................... 16 3.1.6 UNDP’s comparative advantage ........................................................................................... 16 3.1.7 Linkages between the project and other interventions within the sector .......................... 16 3.1.8 Management provisions ....................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Project Implementation .............................................................................................................. 17 3.2.1 Adaptive Management .................................................................................................. 17 3.2.2 Partnership Agreements....................................................................................................... 17 3.2.3 Feedback on Monitoring-Evaluation Activities for Adaptive Management ......................... 18 3.2.4 Project Finance ..................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.5 Monitoring and Evaluation: Design at Entry and Implementation ...................................... 18 3.2.6 UNDP and Executing Agency implementation, execution, coordination and operations ... 19 3.3 Analysis of Project Results and Performance .............................................................................. 20 ~ 2 ~ 3.3.1 Analysis of the overall results ............................................................................................... 20 3.3.2 Relevance ............................................................................................................................. 26 3.3.3 Effectiveness ......................................................................................................................... 27 3.3.4 Efficiency .............................................................................................................................. 30 3.3.5 Country Ownership .............................................................................................................. 32 3.3.6 Mainstreaming ..................................................................................................................... 32 3.3.7 Catalytic role and impacts .................................................................................................... 33 3.3.8 Sustainability ........................................................................................................................ 36 5. CONCLUSIONS, LESSONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................ 38 5.1 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................. 38 5.2 Lessons learnt .............................................................................................................................. 38 5.3 Recommendations....................................................................................................................... 39 6. ANNEXES ................................................................................................................................ 41 6.1 Annex 1: UNDP-GEF Terms of Reference for Final Evaluation .................................................... 41 6.2 Annex 2: Some Characteristics of the Samples ........................................................................... 58 6.3 Annex 3: Other Tables of Analysis ............................................................................................... 62 6.4 Annex 4: Itinerary ........................................................................................................................ 63 6.5 Annex 5: List of Persons Interviewed .......................................................................................... 64 6.6 Annex 6: Summary of Field Visits ................................................................................................ 66 6.7 Annex 7: List of Documents Reviewed ........................................................................................ 67 6.8 Annex 8: Questionnaires Used and Summary of Results ............................................................ 68 6.9 Annex 9 : Formulaire d’accord du consultant d’évaluation ........................................................ 69 6.10 Annex 10: Evaluation Report Clearance Form .......................................................................... 69 ~ 3 ~ COVER PAGE Name of project UNDP/GEF: Support to the Building of Technical, Human and Financial Capacity in Sustainable Land Management and the Fight against Desertification in Guinea-Bissau Project ID UNDP and GEF: GNB 00043166 and PIMS 3386 and GEF ID (PMIS) 3481 Evaluation schedule and date of evaluation report: from 19 November to 20 December 2012 Regions and countries included in the report: Africa, Guinea-Bissau GEF Operational Programme / strategic programme: Land degradation OP 15/SP 1 Building of targeted capacities Executing agency and project partners: Government of Guinea-Bissau via the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (ex-Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development), PRESAR-BAD, CILSS, Government of Portugal Members of Evaluation Team: Roger SOUBEIGA, international consultant and team leader, and Alfonso Ildo LOPES, national consultant Acknowledgements: The

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    69 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us