Simcha Krauss

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Simcha Krauss Books Community, Covenant and Selected Letters and Communications, Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik The Rav was so complex a figure that different individuals perceived him in different ways. We therefore thought it appropriate to publish two reviews of the book on the Rav’s letters so as to better capture the richness of his thought and personality. Ed. Reviewed by Simcha Krauss t is common knowledge that the Yet even as the Rav’s influence grew, rabbi of Kovno, with a request that he be Brisker method of Talmud study is as he gained recognition as Orthodoxy’s sent a telegram with a yes or no response, difficult and complex. The terms “two dominant Torah and intellectual figure, without the theoretical pilpul on which I and as studies of the Rav’s teachings mul- the decision was based. The implication dinim,” “gavra and cheftza,” “ma’ase and kinyan,” all freely used by adherents of tiplied, his role as communal leader was was that either Rav Chaim was afraid of this school of thought, show that seem- questioned. Amidst the accolades heaped deciding, or that, as Rav Zevin suggests, on the Rav—such as that “people will be he was always able to see another possibil- ingly simple concepts of Jewish law can 1 3 be examined and explained dialectically, reading him in a thousand years” —some ity of argumentation. Hence, the percep- that is, in multi-faceted and, at times, wondered whether he was really a posek, tion of Brisk’s inability to decide and its contradictory ways. an authoritative decision maker, for consequent inability to lead. One of the prime expositors of the Community, Covenant and Brisker method in our time was maran The Rav led fearlessly even Commitment offers a radically different Harav Yosef Dov HaLevi Soloveitchik, when he saw dangers or risks understanding of the Rav. The volume z”l. For close to half a century, he taught, in taking particular positions. contains over seventy letters, responsa and inculcated and popularized the Torah of memoranda written by the Rav, dealing Brisk to thousands of students. The Rav, Orthodoxy. The argument went that he with issues of halachah, minhag and pub- however, also broadened and applied this had difficulty making decisions, that he lic policy, as well as chiddushei Torah. method of analysis far beyond the con- was too conflicted, and therefore not real- These writings reflect the gamut of issues fines of “pure” halachah to the whole ly a leader. For example, Hillel Goldberg that touched the lives of American Jews range of aggadic and philosophical texts. accepts the following description of the in the 1950s and ‘60s and ended up on Although comprehensive study of this Rav: the Rav’s desk. In his responses, the Rav phenomenon is beyond the scope of this In its very broad outlines, [Rabbi characteristically cites all sources, analyzes article, the Rav’s creative use of such now Soloveitchik’s] philosophy ... finds great reso- all possibilities and presents a whole array familiar terms as the “two Adams,” “the nance among the modern Orthodox.... But of possible options for resolving the prob- two sides of Elisha ben Abuya” and “the when Rabbi Soloveitchik attempts to apply lems. The mastery of text and theory dis- two covenants” illustrates the point. this philosophy of life to reality, his position played is awesome. But these questions is often indecisive, vacillating, and quite demanded answers, and the Rav provides contrary to expectations. It is the Orthodox the latter with confidence and certitude. Rabbi Krauss was the spiritual leader of Youth who made of Rabbi Soloveitchik a charis- The responses are precise, authoritative, Israel of Hillcrest, in New York, and the imme- matic leader; he disdains this role for him- definitive and often courageous. 2 diate past president of the Religious Zionists of self. The following illustrates the Rav’s America. The author expresses his appreciation In fact, this sort of criticism is not brilliance as a decision maker: In 1950, a to his wife, Esther, and Rabbi Zalman Alpert, new to the history of Brisk. Rav Shlomo supporter of Cornell University left a reference librarian at Yeshiva University’s Yosef Zevin reports that when Rav Chaim bequest for the building of an interfaith Mendel Gottesman Library of Soloveitchik, the Rav’s grandfather, was chapel. Part of the design was for stained Hebraica/Judaica, for their help in preparation confronted by a difficult she’eilah (ques- glass windows depicting human figures, of this article. Rabbi Krauss and his wife tion of Jewish law), he would turn to Rav albeit without any Christological motifs. recently made aliyah and live in Yerusha-layim. Yitzchak Elchanan Spector, the great When some Jewish faculty members 88 JEWISH ACTION Fall 5766/2005 (continued on page 90) (continued from page 88) objected, the university responded that it of the Rabbinical Council of America With full cognizance of the implica- would respect their wishes if a rabbinic turns to the Rav about an invitation the tions of such a halakhic decision, I would authority backed them up. They turned RCA received to cooperate with a group still advise every Orthodox Jew to forego to the Rav, limiting their question to the of non-Orthodox and secular Jewish tefilah be-tzibbur even on Rosh Hashana permissibility of depicting human figures. scholars in the preparation of a new and Yom Kippur rather than enter a syna- 6 The Rav’s response traces the English translation of the Bible. The Rav gogue with mixed pews. halachah and history of the second of the rejects the idea, explaining: This was, of course, strong medi- Ten Commandments, and concludes that I am afraid that the purpose of this cine. But the Rav believed that only such any representation of the human form in undertaking is not to infuse the spirit of a self-confident Orthodoxy would sur- the context of worship, no matter how Torah she-be-al peh into the new English vive. He felt he had to inculcate universal its character, is halachically version but … to satisfy the so-called mod- Orthodox circles with dignity—kevod objectionable. But the Rav does not stop ern “scientific” demands for a more exact HaTorah. When shown a responsum by a there. Acknowledging that he fully under- rendition … in full accord with, or at least non-Orthodox scholar, he reacted stood the implications “in terms of public influenced by, higher Biblical criticism, as follows: relations,” he forcefully attacks the very and I cannot see how we, representatives of ... I have not read the responsum you notion of sharing an interfaith chapel: Torah she-be-al peh, can lend our name to sent me on the question of grafting human 5 The idea of a common house of such an undertaking. bone tissue. I tore it up immediately. I prayer is absolutely irreconcilable with the The Rav realized that his pesak refuse to deal with any halakhic essay, Jewish philosophy of worship ... the worship would be interpreted as a sign of Ortho- regardless of its scholastic merits or fallacies, of God is not a social or collective gesture doxy isolating itself from the rest of the prepared by a representative of a group but is a genuinely individual, most person- Jewish community. In fact, he anticipated whose philosophy is diametrically opposed to al, intimate ... relationship which cannot this critique: Torah and tradition and which does not 4 be shared.… I noticed in your letter that you are a accept the authority of Halakhah as a When this question arose, the bit disturbed about the probability of being Divine and transcendental guide for the Jewish community in America was weak, left out. Let me tell you that this attitude of individual and the community. I am and the Orthodox community weaker shocked at the nonsensical attitude of our still. For American Jews, the priority was The Rav had no hesitation, representatives in tolerating such a pitiful to belong, to homogenize into the larger when the occasion called state of affairs and surrendering the most society, not to stand apart. In some quar- sacred prerogative of the traditional rab- ters, identification with Israel was inter- for it, in appearing harsh, binate, hora’ah [halakhic decision making], to an apostle of a non-halakhic brand of preted as dual loyalty. Jewish day school blunt and inflexible. 7 was widely considered “parochial” and Judaism. “ghettoizing.” Sociologists echoed many fear is responsible for many commissions The Rav would not brook ideologi- ordinary Americans in suggesting that all and omissions, compromises and fallacies on cal or theological syncretism. But he was religions share a common message, so our part which have contributed greatly to not only a naysayer; the Rav opposed the there was no need to identify with a par- the prevailing confusion within the Jewish idea that the survival of Orthodoxy ticular creed. In the Jewish community, community and to the loss of our self- depended on isolation and exclusivity. He Orthodox rabbis were up against inter- esteem, our experience of ourselves as inde- had a positive agenda to bring Torah lir- faith services, brotherhood Sabbaths and pendent entities committed to a unique chovah shel ir (to the broad plaza of the Sundays and joint Thanksgiving services; philosophy and way of life. Of course, socia- city) by teaching Torah that was broad, opposition smacked of un-Americanism. bility is a basic virtue and we all hate lone- deep, all-inclusive and all encompassing. In such a cultural environment, it liness and dread the experience of being left The Rav himself was the marbitz took considerable courage for the Rav to alone.
Recommended publications
  • Welcoming New Alumni to Ner Michoel
    Issue #13 • September 2016 • Elul 5776 הרב אדוננו רבי יצחק לוריא זכרונו לברכה כתב "ואשר לא צדה והאלקים 'אנה' 'לידו' 'ושמתי' 'לך'"... ראשי תיבות אלול, לומר כי חודש זה הוא עת רצון לקבל תשובה על החטאים שעשה בכל השנה .)קיצור שולחן ערוך סימן קכח'( he Arizal derives from the posuk which tells us that a Yisroel. You will read of Ner Michoel’s newest project in ,which talmidim are welcomed into the ranks of Ner Michoel ,עיר מקלט can save himself by taking refuge in an רוצח בשוגג Tthat there is a special time of year, Chodesh Elul, which as they take leave of the Yeshiva’s Beis Medrash. And of a special closeness, course, most importantly, you will read about “us” – the– רצון is a refuge of sorts. It is a time of during which teshuva is most readily accepted. alumni – two special individuals who have recently made the transition of resettling in the United States and another For us at Ner Michoel Headquarters this Arizal strikes a who recently celebrated a monumental accomplishment, a resonant chord, for as we write these words, we are presently Siyum HaShas. “taking refuge” in an aircraft above the Atlantic Ocean, en route to participate in an event marking the beginning of .גוט געבענשט יאר and a כתיבה וחתימה טובה Ner Michoel’s fifth year. Ner Michoel itself is meant to be Wishing everyone a an embassy, a refuge of sorts, through which our alumni can “touch back” to their years in Yeshiva. In this issue you will read of the various Ner Michoel events and projects, which concluded Year #4.
    [Show full text]
  • Moshe Meiselman
    Commitment: Edited by Nathaniel Helfgot Ktav Publishing House/The Toras HoRav Foundation New Jersey, 2005 352 pages Reviewed by Moshe Meiselman his book comprises many letters him into the leadership of the Modern community to engage in theological dia- that span the course of the Rav’s Orthodox rabbinate that was mostly logue. The Rav felt that not only was public life. Many pictures of the comprised of his talmidim. In addition, such dialogue with the Catholic Church T wrong, but he also felt that its ultimate Rav emerge from these letters. For those he entered the public arena because he who are historically unaware, the Rav’s either perceived a serious threat to the goal was shmad (apostasy). Post- domination of communal life during the Jewish people or to traditional Jewish Holocaust Christian theological tri- post-war period emerges with great clari- life. Although the Rav was very often umphalism always weighed heavily in his ty. The editor indicates that the Rav’s flexible to the point of frustration for mind. This was also evident in his dis- daughters and son-in-law chose the let- those who wanted a more dogmatic cussion of Zionism. The establishment ters included in this volume. He also approach, when he perceived that the of the State of Israel was not only a refu- provides a brief background to various specific issue at hand created a danger, tation of this triumphalism but also of letters both in his introduction and in he could be inflexible and totally all of Christian theology. In Kol Dodi the preface to the letters themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • TORAH TO-GO® Established by Rabbi Hyman and Ann Arbesfeld April 2015 • Pesach-Yom Haatzmaut 5775
    Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary Yeshiva University Center for the Jewish Future THE BENJAMIN AND ROSE BERGER TORAH TO-GO® Established by Rabbi Hyman and Ann Arbesfeld April 2015 • Pesach-Yom Haatzmaut 5775 Dedicated in memory of Cantor Jerome L. Simons Featuring Divrei Torah from Rabbi Kenneth Brander • Rabbi Assaf Bednarsh Rabbi Josh Blass • Rabbi Reuven Brand Rabbi Daniel Z. Feldman Rabbi Lawrence Hajioff • Rona Novick, PhD Rabbi Uri Orlian • Rabbi Ari Sytner Rabbi Mordechai Torczyner • Rabbi Ari Zahtz Insights on Yom Haatzmaut from Rabbi Naphtali Lavenda Rebbetzin Meira Davis Rabbi Kenny Schiowitz 1 Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary • The Benjamin and Rose Berger CJF Torah To-Go Series • Pesach 5775 We thank the following synagogues who have pledged to be Pillars of the Torah To-Go® project Congregation Kehillat Shaarei United Orthodox Beth Shalom Yonah Menachem Synagogues Rochester, NY Modiin, Israel Houston, TX Congregation The Jewish Center Young Israel of Shaarei Tefillah New York, NY New Hyde Park Newton Centre, MA New Hyde Park, NY For nearly a decade, the Benajmin and Rose Berger Torah To-Go® series has provided communities throughout North America and Israel with the highest quality Torah articles on topics relevant to Jewish holidays throughout the year. We are pleased to present a dramatic change in both layout and content that will further widen the appeal of the publication. You will notice that we have moved to a more magazine-like format that is both easier to read and more graphically engaging. In addition, you will discover that the articles project a greater range in both scholarly and popular interest, providing the highest level of Torah content, with inspiration and eloquence.
    [Show full text]
  • Makkas Bechoros: Firstborn Vengeance R’ Chaim Soskil
    למען תספר A Journal of Divrei Torah in honor of Pesach 5781 Compiled by the Members of the Bais Medrash of Ranchleigh 6618 Deancroft Rd Baltimore, MD 21209 No rights reserved Make as many copies as you like For your convenience, this Kuntress along with other Torah works and Shiurim associated with the Zichron Yaakov Eliyahu Fund are available online for free download at www.zichronyaakoveliyahu.org It was on Erev Shabbos, Zos Chanukah when the Mara D’Asra offered me the privilege of sponsoring this year’s Pesach Kuntress. At that point, Pesach was the furthest thing from my mind. There were still several sufganiyot to eat, latkes to digest, and challah to buy – not exactly very Pesach-like. But, perhaps, upon closer reflection, there indeed, may be a connection between the two. U’Lemaan Tesapeir b’aznei bincha u’ben bincha. Why does the pasuk require us to give the message davka, “b’aznei bincha,” in the ears of the children? The Tolner Rebbe, shlita, explains that when you give a message into a listener’s ear, it means that the message and intent is specifically crafted and delivered for that person. On Seder night, when the transmission of our mesorah is in the line, it does not suffice to provide a generic, blanket declaration. Rather, father and grandfather, Rebbi and Morah, are required to craft a message that is fit, appreciated, and understood by the individual listener. Each generation, each era, and each child needs a uniquely developed message that will resonate b’aznei bincha. Since last Pesach, the messages and words we imparted to our children were Corona, quarantine, bidood, vaccination, and social distancing.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BENJAMIN and ROSE BERGER TO-GO® Establishedtorah by Rabbi Hyman and Ann Arbesfeld • April 2018 • Yom Haatzmaut 5778
    Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary • YU Center for the Jewish Future THE BENJAMIN AND ROSE BERGER TO-GO® EstablishedTORAH by Rabbi Hyman and Ann Arbesfeld • April 2018 • Yom Haatzmaut 5778 Dedicated in memory of Cantor Jerome L. Simons Israel at 70 Commemorating the 25th Seven Decades of Israel Yahrtzeit of Rabbi Joseph B. Top Seven Torah Issues Soloveitchik zt”l from the 70 Years of the The Rav on Religious Zionism State of Israel We thank the following synagogues which have pledged to be Pillars of the Torah To-Go® project Beth David Synagogue Congregation Ohab Zedek Young Israel of West Hartford, CT New York, NY Century City Los Angeles, CA Beth Jacob Congregation Congregation Beverly Hills, CA Shaarei Tefillah Young Israel of Newton Centre, MA New Hyde Park Bnai Israel – Ohev Zedek New Hyde Park, NY Philadelphia, PA Green Road Synagogue Beachwood, OH Young Israel of Congregation Scarsdale Ahavas Achim The Jewish Center Scarsdale, NY Highland Park, NJ New York, NY Young Israel of Congregation Benai Asher Jewish Center of Toco Hills The Sephardic Synagogue Brighton Beach Atlanta, GA of Long Beach Brooklyn, NY Long Beach, NY Young Israel of Koenig Family Foundation Congregation Brooklyn, NY West Hartford Beth Sholom West Hartford, CT Young Israel of Providence, RI Young Israel of Lawrence-Cedarhurst Cedarhurst, NY West Hempstead West Hempstead, NY Rabbi Dr. Ari Berman, President, Yeshiva University Rabbi Yaakov Glasser, David Mitzner Dean, Center for the Jewish Future Rabbi Menachem Penner, Max and Marion Grill Dean, Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary Rabbi Robert Shur, Series Editor Rabbi Joshua Flug, General Editor Rabbi Michael Dubitsky, Content Editor Andrea Kahn, Copy Editor Copyright © 2018 All rights reserved by Yeshiva University Yeshiva University Center for the Jewish Future 500 West 185th Street, Suite 419, New York, NY 10033 • office@yutorah.org • 212.960.0074 This publication contains words of Torah.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDAIC 394 Major Issues in Contemporary Jewish Life 4 Credits Integrative Experience Course for Judaic Studies Majors Fall 2012
    JUDAIC 394 Major Issues in Contemporary Jewish Life 4 credits Integrative Experience course for Judaic Studies majors Fall 2012 Prof. Jay Berkovitz 413-545-5868 Off. hrs. Tu Th 10:00 am and by appt. jrb@judnea.umass.edu Course Description: Major Issues in Contemporary Jewish Life will examine several of the central questions facing contemporary Jewry by reflecting on the role of history, text, and memory in the shaping of Jewish identity and politics. Topics will include Judaism’s role in civilization; contested Jewish Identities; political and religious debate concerning Israel; the Holocaust as icon of Jewish identity; pluralism and the paradoxes of unity; bioethical dilemmas, including how Jewish law has responded to advances in reproductive technology, surrogacy, and stem cell research. Attention will be given to the broad spectrum ideas and debate within the Jewish world. By carefully considering these issues, this course aims to bring the major challenges in contemporary Jewish life into sharper focus. Required Texts or Readings: • Jack Wertheimer, A People Divided: Judaism in Contemporary America (Hanover, 1993). • Readings posted on SPARK, as noted below. Course Requirements: Assignments and Grading: 50% of your grade will be determined by: A 15-page research-based and documented paper or project to be determined in consultation with the instructor. 20% of your grade will be based on An oral presentation prepared and presented in pairs or small groups, to be determined in consultation with the instructor. This oral report will ask you to gather from among your classmates and other peers popular understandings of Jews and Jewish history, and knowledge about Jews learned in previous classes, and then to place this information within the context of the assigned readings and class discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ok, Ladies and Gentlemen Ok Um As Far As the What My Function
    Edited Transcript of “Women in Communal Leadership Positions” Lecture by Rabbi Aryeh A. Frimer Tevet 24, 5767 - January 14, 2007 Tiferet Moshe Synagogue – Rabbi Jacob Berman Community Center Rehovot, Israel My function here tonight is not to pasken; let me make that clear from the outset. My mandate from the Shul Board is to educate the community on the parameters of the issue and present a variety of opinions of people I have consulted with. I have consulted with them not in the form of a psak. These are individuals whose opinions I value, and I asked them what they suggest - how we should proceed on the issue. This issue of women’s involvement in communal leadership happens to be absolutely fascinating from a halakhic and historical perspective. It has come up throughout the modern period in fury at least three times and the issue, as you’re going to see, has not really been completely resolved. For the most part, it’s been resolved in practice in various ways, but not in theory. The shiur will take at least an hour and a quarter. I will do my best not to express my own opinions – that can be done in private circles. I don’t think there’s anyone except perhaps my wife who really knows what I think. To be honest, I’m not sure what I think. But, it’s not a trivial issue. I think it should be made very clear that throughout Jewish history, and in fact general history, we don’t really find women in long term leadership roles until the modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Essay: Torah, Chazal and Science
    17 Review Essay Torah, Chazal and Science by Rabbi Moshe Meiselman (Lakewood: Israel Bookshop Publications, 2013) 887 pp. By: NATHAN AVIEZER It is accepted throughout the Torah world that in the realm of halakha, the rulings of Hazaḷ are binding on every Jew because Hazaḷ received their authority in matters of halakha from the Torah. In the present review es- say, however, we are discussing something entirely different. Our subject here are the words of Hazaḷ that lie outside the realm of halakha. These in- clude their statements about nature, science, medicine, and history. Are these statements of Hazaḷ also binding on us? This question is the subject of several books that have appeared in recent years: “Sefer Hayyim be-Emunatom: Ha-Emuna be-Hazaḷ u-ve-Divreihem ha-Kedoshim” (Hebrew, 1996) by Rav Reuven Schmeltzer, “Thinking About Creation: Eternal Torah and Modern Physics” (2001) by Rav Andrew Goldfin- ger, and has recently been analyzed in great detail in the 887-page book “Torah, Chazal, and Science” by Rav Moshe Meiselman. These three books have a common theme, namely, that every word of Hazaḷ was divinely inspired, and therefore, must be accepted by every Jew as absolutely true. In the words of the author of the book under review (p. 107): “A major thesis of this book is that if Hazaḷ make a definitive statement re- garding science, it means that they know it to be unassailable.” Moreover, we are told that to think otherwise is an act of heresy. Rav Schmeltzer Nathan Aviezer is Professor of Physics and former Chairman of the Physics Department of Bar-Ilan University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Just Price and Price-Controls in Jewish Law
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive New Wine in Old Flasks: the Just Price and Price-Controls in Jewish Law Makovi, Michael 30 January 2016 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/69119/ MPRA Paper No. 69119, posted 02 Feb 2016 16:04 UTC “New Wine in Old Flasks: the Just Price and Price-Controls in Jewish Law”1 Michael Makovi mbmakovi@gmail.com Unaffiliated; recent BA graduate of Loyola University, New Orleans (2015, economics, BA, summa cum laude with university honors) Abstract: The halakhah (Jewish law) includes legislation aiming at might be called “social justice.” These halakhot (pl.) include the laws of ona'ah and hafka'at she'arim / hayyei nefesh – roughly analogous to the famous Medieval “just price” laws – as well as legal restrictions on middlemen and speculators. In the light of modern economics, these Jewish laws, like all attempts at price-fixing, are shown to be self-defeating; the means conflict with the ends sought. The conflict between religion and science is not limited to cosmology and biology, but may include economics as well. It is proposed that the halakhah be modified in such a way as to preserve – as much as possible – the integrity of both the halakhah and economic science alike; when an ethical system makes certain scientific presuppositions, it is sometimes possible to preserve the ethical system by disentangling it from its non-essential scientific presuppositions. Keywords: price controls; price fixing; just price; jewish business ethics; religious economics JEL Codes: A12, B11, D00, K20, P00, Z12 Louis Ginzberg once joked (1920: 97) that The devil, according to Shakespeare, quotes Scripture.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Feminism, Halakhah, and Social Status Together: Women's Ordination in American Judaism
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Senior Scholars Papers in Jewish Studies Jewish Studies Program 2013 Bringing Feminism, Halakhah, and Social Status Together: Women's Ordination in American Judaism Michelle Seares Colby College, michelle.seares@gmail.com Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/jewishstudies_student_scholarship Part of the Jewish Studies Commons, Religion Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author. Recommended Citation Seares, Michelle, "Bringing Feminism, Halakhah, and Social Status Together: Women's Ordination in American Judaism" (2013). Senior Scholars Papers in Jewish Studies. Paper 1. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/jewishstudies_student_scholarship/1 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Jewish Studies Program at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Scholars Papers in Jewish Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. Bringing Feminism, Halakhah, and Social Status Together: Women’s Ordination in American Judaism Michelle Seares Undergraduate Thesis Colby College Jewish Studies Program April 30, 2013 2 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..3 1. Halakhic and Social Objections to Women as Rabbis in Talmudic Literature………………...7
    [Show full text]
  • Maimonides' Yahweh: How His Via Negativa God Influenced Rabbinic
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY MAIMONIDES’ YAHWEH: HOW HIS VIA NEGATIVA GOD INFLUENCED RABBINIC JUDAISM AND ITS SUBSEQUENT MISUNDERSTANDING OF INCARNATIONAL CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE RAWLINGS SCHOOL OF DIVINITY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THEOLOGY AND APOLOGETICS BY AMY KAREN DOWNEY LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA 27 APRIL 2016 Copyright © 2016 by Amy Karen Downey All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL SHEET MAIMONIDES’ YAHWEH: HOW HIS VIA NEGATIVA GOD INFLUENCED RABBINIC JUDAISM AND ITS SUBSEQUENT MISUNDERSTANDING OF INCARNATIONAL THEOLOGY Amy Karen Downey Read and approved by: Chairperson: _____Edward L. Smither________ Reader: _____Kenneth G. Cleaver________ Reader: _____Leo R. Percer_____________ Date: _____27 April 2016______ iii To Barbara Ellen Downey, who was told that girls did not need to go to college but can now say, “My daughter, the doctor.” and to the 99% who keep me awake at night and keep me going during the day—Romans 1:16. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgement ............................................................................................................................ix Abstract .............................................................................................................................................xi CHAPTER 1: Establishing the Rationale for the Dissertation ....................................................1 Problem Statement .................................................................................................................1 Brief Historical
    [Show full text]
  • Yeshiva University – East Brunswick Pre-Med Internship & Community Learning Program
    Yeshiva University – East Brunswick Pre-Med Internship & Community Learning Program May 31 – June 23, 2013 • 5773 Welcome Meet the Students MICHAL LOSHINSKY This summer, Yeshiva University’s Center for the Jewish Michal, from Brooklyn, NY, is completing her first year at Stern Future is excited to partner with the Young Israel of East College, where she is majoring in biology. She isn’t yet sure Brunswick on an exciting new program: the Yeshiva of her career plans, but hopes that her experience in East University - East Brunswick Pre-Med Internship & Brunswick will help with her decision! Community Learning Program. The program will consist of ten YU students who will have the exciting opportunity to intern with and be mentored by doctors in 12 different medical and DEVORAH FARBER surgical specialties. At the same time, the students will learn and teach Devorah was born and raised in Charlotte, NC, attended high Torah in the evenings and become a part of the East Brunswick Jewish school in Memphis, TN, and currently lives in Atlanta, GA. Devorah is a junior at Stern College and likes to spend her community. This innovative program will assist YU students in advancing time volunteering at New York Presbyterian Hospital. In her their career interests in medicine, while simultaneously exposing them to spare time she enjoys playing the piano, singing, cooking, and a wonderful, warm and vibrant Jewish community. Additionally, it brings being outdoors. the energy and idealism of YU students to East Brunswick, where they will combine their engagement in the workplace with regular Torah study MAYA TSARFATI and volunteerism in the community.
    [Show full text]