DOCSLIB.ORG

The Mindful Hand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Mindful Hand The mindful hand 99780-07_The780-07_The MMindfulindful HHand_Voorweriand_Voorweri i 113-09-20073-09-2007 009:39:359:39:35 History of Science and Scholarship in the Netherlands, volume 9 The series History of Science and Scholarship in the Netherlands presents studies on a variety of subjects in the history of science, scholarship and academic institutions in the Netherlands. Titles in this series 1. Rienk Vermij, The Calvinist Copernicans. The reception of the new astronomy in the Dutch Republic, 1575-1750. 2002, isbn 90-6984-340-4 2. Gerhard Wiesenfeldt, Leerer Raum in Minervas Haus. Experimentelle Naturlehre an der Universität Leiden, 1675-1715, 2002, isbn 90-6984-339-0 3. Rina Knoeff, Herman Boerhaave (1668-1738). Calvinist chemist and physician. 2002, isbn 90-6984-342-0 4. Johanna Levelt Sengers, How fl uids unmix. Discoveries by the School of Van der Waals and Kamerlingh Onnes. 2002, isbn 90-6984-357-9 5. Jacques L.R. Touret and Robert P.W. Visser, editors, Dutch pioneers of the earth sciences, 2004, isbn 90-6984-389-7 6. Renée E. Kistemaker, Natalya P. Kopaneva, Debora J. Meijers and Georgy Vilinbakhov, editors, The Paper Museum of the Academy of Sciences in St Peterburg (c. 1725-1760), Introduction and Interpretation, 2005, isbn 90-6984-424-9, isbn dvd 90-6984-425-7, isbn Book and dvd 90-6984-426-5 7. Charles van den Heuvel, ‘De Huysbou’. A reconstruction of an unfi nished treatise on architecture, town planning and civil engineering by Simon Stevin, 2005, isbn 90-6984- 432-x 8. Florike Egmond, Paul Hoftijzer and Robert P.W. Visser, editors, Carolus Clusius. Towards a cultural history of a Renaissance naturalist, 2007, isbn 978-90- 6984-506-7 9. Lissa Roberts, Simon Schaffer, Peter Dear, editors, The mindful hand: inquiry and invention from the late Renaissance to early industrialisation, 2007, isbn 978-90- 6984-483-1 Editorial Board K. van Berkel, University of Groningen W.Th.M. Frijhoff, Free University of Amsterdam A. van Helden, Utrecht University W.E. Krul, University of Groningen A. de Swaan, Amsterdam School of Sociological Research R.P.W. Visser, Utrecht University 99780-07_The780-07_The MMindfulindful HHand_Voorweriiand_Voorwerii iiii 113-09-20073-09-2007 009:39:359:39:35 The mindful hand Inquiry and invention from the late Renaissance to early industrialisation Edited by Lissa Roberts Simon Schaffer Peter Dear Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam 2007 99780-07_The780-07_The MMindfulindful HHand_Voorweriiiand_Voorweriii iiiiii 113-09-20073-09-2007 009:39:359:39:35 Copyright © 2007 Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo- copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Information and orders: Edita knaw P.O. Box 19121, 1000 gc Amsterdam, The Netherlands t + 31 20 551 07 00 f + 31 20 620 49 41 [email protected] www.knaw.nl/edita isbn 978-90-6984-483-1 The paper in this publication meets the requirements of « iso-norm 9706 (1994) for permanence. Illustration cover: The ‘horticultural’ method of drawing an ellipse as illustrated by Van Schooten in La Dioptrique. 99780-07_The780-07_The MMindfulindful HHand_Voorwerivand_Voorweriv iivv 113-09-20073-09-2007 009:39:369:39:36 The hand is the cutting edge of the mind – Jacob Bronowski 99780-07_The780-07_The MMindfulindful HHand_Voorwervand_Voorwerv v 113-09-20073-09-2007 009:39:369:39:36 99780-07_The780-07_The MMindfulindful HHand_Voorwerviand_Voorwervi vvii 113-09-20073-09-2007 009:39:369:39:36 Acknowledgements As initiator of this project, it is my special privilege to thank a number of peo- ple and organisations responsible for helping to bring this work to fruition. I fi rst had the occasion to develop and enunciate the germ of this book’s approach when asked by Pamela H. Smith and Paula Findlen to write an epilogue for their groundbreaking volume Merchants and marvels: commerce, science and art in early-mod- ern Europe (Routledge, 2002). Thanks to both of them for trusting me with such an important task and for giving me the chance to think about the big sweep of early-modern European history. Also fundamentally responsible for getting this project off the ground conceptually are my dear colleagues at the Univer- sity of Twente – including Johan Schot, who has left us for the heavy duties he bears in Eindhoven. This is the group that fi rst pushed me to make good on my offi cial employment as a historian of technology. Slightly to the north in Gron- ingen, Klaas van Berkel worked closely with me as I polished the fi rst grant proposal that materially got this project under way. Without fi nancial support from both the Netherlands Organisation for Scientifi c Research (NWO) and the American National Science Foundation, I would never have had the time or resources to research the background or actually pursue what has become a most rewarding communal effort. It was the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) that awarded me funds and material support for an Akademie Colloquium. Known then under the title ‘Inventive Intersections: sites, artefacts and the rise of modern science and technology,’ the KNAW workshop unfolded as a sumptuous three-day extrava- ganza of intellectual feasting and late night drinking, the most tangible results of which have come to rest between the covers of this book. Not every workshop participant contributed an essay to this volume, but their generous engagement and the substance of their contributions have nonetheless enriched the project greatly. Along with a hearty thanks to the authors whose essays appear in this volume, I must thank Ken Alder, Klaas van Berkel, Paola Bertucci, James Bono, Pascal Brioist, H. Floris Cohen, Michael Dennis, Marc Ratcliff and Larry Stewart. I also thank KNAW staff member Martine Wagenaar, without whose organisational genius the workshop could have never have been such a success. acknowledgements vii 99780-07_The780-07_The MMindfulindful HHand_Voorwerviiand_Voorwervii vviiii 113-09-20073-09-2007 009:39:369:39:36 Since the workshop, Simon Schaffer and Peter Dear have generously donated their time and considerable expertise to help transform three days of intense discussion and delight into a coherent book. They’ve worked hard to help me articulate my vision of this project, which was sometimes as vague as what I see generally without my glasses and put up with any number of pathetically pedantic e-mails from me. Simon deserves extra special thanks for so unselfi shly mentoring me in the name of collegiality. He opened his home and the storehouse of his amazingly considerable knowledge to me on a number of occasions, gently pushing me to make my case – or, thanks to his camaraderie, our case. This book and I owe more to him than to anyone. Finally, for my part, I’d like to dedicate this work to my two fathers. My biological father Morton Roberts provides me with constant inspiration to fi nd the good in every day and every person I meet. My intellectual father Amos Funkenstein had faith and patience enough to invite me long ago on a journey of discovery. Thanks to his example and encouragement, I’ve never stopped scrutinising the arguments that come my way. For that I can never thank him enough. Lissa Roberts November 2006 viii acknowledgements 99780-07_The780-07_The MMindfulindful HHand_Voorwerviiiand_Voorwerviii vviiiiii 113-09-20073-09-2007 009:39:369:39:36 How to read this book This is an ambitious book, composed with a number of purposes and audi- ences in mind. To accommodate these various goals and publics, we would like to propose a number of possible reading strategies. While every reader obviously has their own favourite way of approaching a text, we offer the following advice. For readers who are simply interested in savouring a number of well-crafted essays on the history of natural inquiry and invention – normally spoken of as the history of science and technology – the book can, of course, be opened anywhere. To gain a sense of historical development through time, we suggest that you read the essays in the order that they appear. A primary aim of this volume is to suggest a unifi ed narrative that stretches between the so-called Scientifi c Revolution and the early years of the so-called Industrial Revolution. Our hope is that both historians of science and histo- rians of technology will take the time to consider our argument that the his- tory of inquiry and invention during this extended period is a complex story of complicity between contemplation and manipulation. It is a story that cannot be explained in terms of the causal relationship between theory and practice or – to use anachronistic terms – science and technology. For those who like to approach such claims from the level of empirical detail, we suggest that you skip the book’s preface and go straight to the introductions of our four sections. Read these back-to-back for an overview of the individual topics and themes upon which the volume’s broad historical claims are based. Then fi ll this sketch in by reading the individual essays themselves. In the preface to the entire volume, we bring together a discussion of the book’s historical content and historiographical commitments with its broader, polemical mission. Readers prepared to dive in headfi rst and consider the layered reasons that gave shape to this book, will want to begin here. The message that should then stay with such readers as they subsequently make their way through the volume’s individual essays is three-fold. First, Cartesian dualism does not provide an accurate grid upon which to chart the history of inquiry and invention.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • STEVEN SHAPIN Place of Birth
    CURRICULUM VITAE Name: STEVEN SHAPIN Place of Birth: New York, NY Nationality: U.S.A. Education: (i) 1961-1966: Reed College, Portland, Oregon: B.A. (Major subject: Biology). (ii) 1966-1967: University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin: Post-graduate study in Department of Genetics. (iii) 1968-1971: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: M.A., Ph.D. in History & Sociology of Science: Thesis: “The Royal Society of Edinburgh: A Study of the Social Context of Hanoverian Science.” Academic Employment: (i) 1972: Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire: Visiting Research Fellow in History of Science. (ii) 1973-1988: Edinburgh University, Science Studies Unit: Lecturer in Science Studies. (iii) 1988-1989: 1 Edinburgh University, Science Studies Unit: Reader in Science Studies. (iv) 1979 (summer): University of Pennsylvania, Department of History & Sociology of Science: Visiting Professor, teaching postgraduate course on sociological methods in history of science. (v) 1979-1980: John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellow: Visiting Fellow in Department of History & Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. (vi) 1986 (spring): Simon P. Silverman Distinguished Visiting Professor, Institute for the History & Philosophy of Science & Ideas, Tel-Aviv University. (vii) 1996-1997: Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA. (viii) 2001 (Fall Semester): Visiting Professor, Department of the History of Science, Harvard University. (ix) 1989-2003: Professor of Sociology, University of California, San Diego (1994-98: also Adjunct Professor of History). (x) 2004- : Franklin L. Ford Professor of the History of Science, Harvard University. (xi) January-May 2012: Visiting Professor of History at Columbia University. 2 (xii) May-June 2012: S. T. Lee Visiting Research Professorship in School of Advanced Study, University of London (May-June 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • GRIER-THESIS.Pdf
    HYPOTHESIS NON FINGO: THE DEVELOPMENT OF ISAAC NEWTON’S LITERARY TECHNOLOGY A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts In the Department of History University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By JASON GRIER Copyright Jason Grier, August, 2012. All rights reserved. Permission to Use In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of History University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A5 i ABSTRACT This thesis examines a dispute between Isaac Newton and Robert Hooke during the 1670s over Newton’s “New theory about light and colour.” The controversy offers a fascinating window into the development of Newton's literary methodology for the presentation of his experimental facts.
    [Show full text]
  • Hps.Cam.Ac.Uk
    CONTENTS The Department .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 Congratulations .............................................................................................................................. 4 Garden Party in Memory of Mary Hesse ................................................................................... 5 Staff and Visitors ........................................................................................................................... 7 Students .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Comings and Goings .................................................................................................................. 12 Roles and Responsibilities .......................................................................................................... 13 Prizes, Projects and Honours .................................................................................................... 15 Student Prizes .............................................................................................................................. 16 Students .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HPS: Annual Report 2004-2005
    Contents The Department Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 2 Staff and affiliates .......................................................................................................................... 3 Visitors and students ...................................................................................................................... 4 Comings and goings....................................................................................................................... 5 Roles and responsibilities .............................................................................................................. 6 Prizes, projects and honours........................................................................................................... 7 Seminars and special lectures ........................................................................................................ 8 Students Student statistics............................................................................................................................. 9 Part II primary sources essay titles .............................................................................................. 10 Part II dissertation titles ............................................................................................................... 13 MPhil essay and dissertation titles..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    - 1 - Jan Victor Golinski: Curriculum Vitae Address: Department of History, Horton Social Science Center, University of New Hampshire, 20 Academic Way, Durham, NH 03824-3586, U.S.A. Office Phone: (603) 862-3789 Home Phone: (603) 427-2931 Cell Phone: (603) 502-8150 E-mail: [email protected] Web page: http://cola.unh.edu/faculty-member/jan-golinski Born: 9 April 1957, London. Dual UK and US citizenship. Academic Appointments: 2000- : Professor, Department of History and Humanities Program, University of New Hampshire. Chair of the Department of History, 2006-2008, 2009-12, 2016-17. Affiliate Professor of Philosophy, 2015- . 1994-2000: Associate Professor, Department of History and Humanities Program, University of New Hampshire. 1990-94: Assistant Professor, Department of History and Humanities Program, University of New Hampshire. February-June 1992: Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of History, Princeton University. 1986-90: Junior Research Fellow, Churchill College, Cambridge University. 1983-86: Lecturer in History of Science, Department of History, University of Lancaster, UK. Professional Service: History of Science Society: Elected Member of Council (1997-99, 2014-16). Chair of the Nominating Committee (2014-15). Member of By-laws Review Committee (2015). Member of Respectful Behavior Committee (2016). Elected Vice-President; with ex-officio membership on Executive Committee, Council, and Committee on Publications (2018-19). 2018-19: Member of Advisory Board, Studies in Romanticism. 2017-18: Reviewer for Frederick Burkhardt Residential Fellowships, American Council of Learned Societies. 2011: Member of External Review Committee for the Department of History, Kent State University, Ohio. 2009-11: Member of the Peer Review Committee and the Advisory Council, Dibner History of Science Program, Huntington Library.
    [Show full text]
  • The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England
    The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England By Steven Shapin* That which is not able to be performed in a private house will much less be brought to pass in a commonwealth and kingdom. -William Harrison, The Description of England (1587) Y SUBJECT is the place of experiment. I want to know where experimen- M tal science was done. In what physical and social settings? Who was in attendance at the scenes in which experimental knowledge was produced and evaluated? How were they arrayed in physical and social space? What were the conditions of access to these places, and how were transactions across their thresholds managed? The historical materials with which I am going to deal are of special interest. Seventeenth-century England witnessed the rise and institutionalization of a pro- gram devoted to systematic experimentation, accompanied by a literature explic- itly describing and defending practical aspects of that program. Nevertheless, aspects of the historiography manifest in this paper may prove of more general interest. Historians of science and ideas have not, in the main, been much con- cerned with the siting of knowledge production.' This essay offers reasons for systematically studying the venues of knowledge. I want to display the network of connections between the physical and social setting of inquiry and the position of its products on the map of knowledge. I shall try to demonstrate how the siting of knowledge-making practices contributed toward a practical solution of episte- mological problems. The physical and the symbolic siting of experimental work was a way of bounding and disciplining the community of practitioners, it was a * Science Studies Unit, Edinburgh University, 34 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9JT Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Think About Science
    November 14, 21, 28, December 5, 12, 2007 January 2, 9, 16, 23, 30, February 20, 27, March 5, 12, 19, 2008 April 9, 16, 23, 30, May 7, 28, June 4, 11, 18, 2008 HOW TO THINK ABOUT SCIENCE CBC IDEAS Transcripts PO Box 500 Station A Toronto ON M5W 1E6 cbc.ca/ideas [email protected] Tel. 416 205 6010 Fax. 416 205 2376 © 2008 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Under no circumstances may this transcript or matters contained herein be reproduced or otherwise used for any purposes beyond the private use of the recipient (other than newspaper coverage, purposes of reference, discussion and review) without the express written consent of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS 1: Simon Schaffer, co-author of Leviathan and the Air Pump and historian of science at Cambridge 2: Lorraine Daston, director of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin and co-author of Objectivity 3: Margaret Lock, medical anthropologist in the Department of Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University and author of Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death 4: Ian Hacking, philosopher of science at the University of Toronto and the Collège de France, author of Representing and Intervening; Andrew Pickering, sociologist of science at the University of Exeter and author of The Mangle of Practice 5: Ulrich Beck, professor at the Institute of Sociology at the Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich and author of Risk Society; Bruno Latour of Sciences Po in Paris, author of We Have Never Been Modern 6: James Lovelock,
    [Show full text]
  • Leviathan and the Air-Pump a Generation On
    Copyrighted Material • INTRODUCTION TO THE 2011 EDITION • Up for Air: Leviathan and the Air-Pump a Generation On When Princeton University Press asked us whether we were in- terested in participating in a new edition of Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, first published in 1985, we were pleased to have an opportunity to reflect on the circumstances of the book’s original composition and some aspects of its early reception. In addition to this substantial new introduction, a decision was made to omit the translation of Thomas Hobbes’s Dialogus physicus; otherwise, the text is unchanged. • • • There are two technologies especially relevant to this new edition of Leviathan and the Air-Pump. The first one is obvious: the air-pump. Its physical operation and its role in making seventeenth-century scien- tific knowledge were this book’s stated subjects. It has been said that what distinguished this way of telling a historical story about science is that its “real hero” was not a person but an instrument.1 The second technology is not so obvious, nor was it obvious to the authors when they wrote the book over a quarter century ago. Just as the air-pump was a device for making scientific knowledge of a certain kind, so this technology was a device for making historical knowledge of a certain kind. That technology was a typewriter. It’s useful to bear this second knowledge-making technology in mind since its workings were transparent to the authors in the mid- 1980s when it served their knowledge-making purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mindful Hand
    The mindful hand 99780-07_The780-07_The MMindfulindful HHand_Voorweriand_Voorweri i 113-09-20073-09-2007 009:39:359:39:35 History of Science and Scholarship in the Netherlands, volume 9 The series History of Science and Scholarship in the Netherlands presents studies on a variety of subjects in the history of science, scholarship and academic institutions in the Netherlands. Titles in this series 1. Rienk Vermij, The Calvinist Copernicans. The reception of the new astronomy in the Dutch Republic, 1575-1750. 2002, isbn 90-6984-340-4 2. Gerhard Wiesenfeldt, Leerer Raum in Minervas Haus. Experimentelle Naturlehre an der Universität Leiden, 1675-1715, 2002, isbn 90-6984-339-0 3. Rina Knoeff, Herman Boerhaave (1668-1738). Calvinist chemist and physician. 2002, isbn 90-6984-342-0 4. Johanna Levelt Sengers, How fl uids unmix. Discoveries by the School of Van der Waals and Kamerlingh Onnes. 2002, isbn 90-6984-357-9 5. Jacques L.R. Touret and Robert P.W. Visser, editors, Dutch pioneers of the earth sciences, 2004, isbn 90-6984-389-7 6. Renée E. Kistemaker, Natalya P. Kopaneva, Debora J. Meijers and Georgy Vilinbakhov, editors, The Paper Museum of the Academy of Sciences in St Peterburg (c. 1725-1760), Introduction and Interpretation, 2005, isbn 90-6984-424-9, isbn dvd 90-6984-425-7, isbn Book and dvd 90-6984-426-5 7. Charles van den Heuvel, ‘De Huysbou’. A reconstruction of an unfi nished treatise on architecture, town planning and civil engineering by Simon Stevin, 2005, isbn 90-6984- 432-x 8. Florike Egmond, Paul Hoftijzer and Robert P.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Perpetual Motion in the Early Eighteenth Century Author(S): Simon Schaffer Source: the British Journal for the History of Science, Vol
    The British Society for the History of Science The Show That Never Ends: Perpetual Motion in the Early Eighteenth Century Author(s): Simon Schaffer Source: The British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Jun., 1995), pp. 157- 189 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of The British Society for the History of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4027676 . Accessed: 28/05/2014 11:44 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge University Press and The British Society for the History of Science are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The British Journal for the History of Science. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Wed, 28 May 2014 11:44:12 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions BJHS, 1995, 28, 157-89 The show that never ends: perpetual motion in the early eighteenth century SIMON SCHAFFER* You will not be displeased to have a rather detailed account of a Machine about which opinions are so divided, and to which almost all the ablest Mathematicians are opposed.
    [Show full text]