DOCSLIB.ORG

Jordan: Between Israel and Iraq | the Washington Institute

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jordan: Between Israel and Iraq | the Washington Institute MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 231 Jordan: Between Israel and Iraq Dec 30, 1996 Brief Analysis ordan's position as a bridge between the Levant and the Persian Gulf, coupled with her small size and lack of J natural resources, have created its unique geopolitical role in the Middle East. Despite being surrounded by powerful neighbors, Jordan consistently exercises an independent approach to achieve its national interests. Perhaps the two most complex and interrelated influences on Jordanian behavior are Amman's relations with Israel to the West and Iraq to the East. Abbas Kelidar: Jordan and Iraq Because of their intertwined political history, which dates to the British Mandate, relations between Jordan and Iraq have always been of vital national interest to the Jordanians. Iraq has frequently served as a counterweight to pressure on Amman from other Arab states, but has also been a major threat to Jordan on occasion. Jordan has consistently supported the regime of Saddam Hussein, most notably after the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979 and Iraq's ensuing eight-year war with Iran. During this period, Jordan assisted Iraq in every way possible, serving as a major trading partner, a diplomatic advocate, an oil conduit, and an arms pipeline, all in an effort to safeguard her own territory against the alliance of Iran and Syria. The strength of this relationship was positively demonstrated by Jordan's sympathy for Iraq during the Gulf War. After the Gulf War, tensions between Jordan and Iraq were strained as a result of Saddam's defeat and the subsequent isolation of both countries. King Hussein seized on the perceived weakness of Saddam's regime (publicly illustrated by the defection of Husayn Kamil to Jordan) in an effort to restore his credibility. To finally embrace the anti-Saddam coalition, the King publicly called on the Iraqi people to overthrow Saddam's regime. But these overtures did not materialize and never posed a serious threat, by themselves, to Saddam's power in fact, they provided Saddam a rallying cry, as many perceived in King Hussein's initiative a bid to restore the Hashemite monarchy to Iraq. With the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 986 the "oil for food" deal and pressure toward reacceptance of Saddam Hussein among some of the GCC states, Jordan's policy vis a vis Iraq seems to be shifting once again. Jordan is not only looking to a renewed trading relationship with Baghdad but also to a rehabilitated Iraq as a check on Iran's growing strength. King Hussein looks forward to a future role mediating between Saddam Hussein and the United States, but, over the long run, Jordan remains wary of a strengthened Iraq still under Saddam's control and does not view him as a long-term partner. If Saddam remains in power, Jordan may seek an alliance with Turkey as a counterbalance. For its part, Israel might view warming relations between Jordan and Iraq and the reacceptance of Iraq in the Arab fold as a possible mechanism to advance the peace process. An Iraqi regime set on mitigating its economic woes may seek Israel out for peace. A renewed relationship between Jordan and Iraq could also be the catalyst that pressures Syria into a peace agreement with Israel. Asher Susser: Jordan and Israel A long list of regional states and external powers see a stable Jordan as a key to regional stability in the Middle East. Israel must be considered to be at the top of this list. This key role, among other factors, has contributed to the kingdom's survival in the face of numerous threats. In essence, Jordan serves as a buffer between Israel and less friendly "outer ring" countries of the Persian Gulf. The recent peace treaty between Jordan and Israel takes this geopolitical reality into account with security arrangements that keep Iraq at a distance by precluding the stationing of potentially hostile foreign troops on Jordanian soil. The true test of this peace treaty, however, is whether Jordan can maintain a balance between peace with Israel and the preservation of its vital links with the Arab hinterland. If Jordan is successful, it would provide a positive model to the region that peace with Israel can be accepted and cultivated along with stable relations with the Arab world. Thus, Israel will look on with great interest to see whether Jordan eventually renews full relations with Iraq without adversely affecting the peace between Jordan and herself. Jordan has long been forced to maneuver back and forth among Israel, Syria, and Iraq to ensure its own security and independence. For decades after the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, it was a well-known secret that Jordan held negotiations with Israel and maintained a clandestine, working relationship with its Labor governments. However, in the late 1970s a number of regional developments led to a realignment of Jordanian foreign policy. Jordan's trust of Israel began to erode with the election of a Likud government in 1977, and its slogan of "Jordan is Palestine." Moreover, the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, and its opposition to the regional status quo, was also perceived as a direct threat to Jordanian security. These challenges to Jordanian stability led Amman to look again toward Iraq as a bulwark against Iran throughout the 1980s. Relations between Israel and Jordan warmed again after the Gulf War, when Israel reassured Jordan of its interest in continued Jordanian stability, and Jordan began to distance itself from Iraq with the launching of the Madrid process. This trend picked up steam with the election of Rabin's Labor government in 1992 and subsequent breakthroughs in the peace process. As a result Jordan reestablished its strategic rapport with Israel. In summer 1996, the pendulum swung back once again. The increased tension in the Arab-Israeli peace process which followed Binyamin Netanyahu's electoral victory in May has resulted in a renewed erosion of Jordanian-Israel relations. A pervasive sense in Jordan that peace with Israel has not delivered the expected economic dividend, coupled with the relaxation of sanctions on Iraq through UNSCR 986, is leading once again to a subtle shift and upgrading of relations between Jordan and Iraq. Ultimately, Amman will probably link continued high-level normalization between Jordan and Israel to the extent of progress on the Palestinian track. Still there is a disturbing sense that Jordanians increasingly believe that expanded economic ties with Iraq not Israel are more likely to provide for Jordan's economic well-being. Jerusalem will presumably monitor Amman's maneuvering between Iraq and Israel closely, to ensure that Jordan's re-engagement with its Arab hinterland does not lead to an erosion of its established peace with Israel. This Special Policy Forum Report was prepared by Ron Dolin. Policy #231 View/Print Page as PDF SHARE EMAIL ALERTS Sign Up TO TOP RECOMMENDED BRIEF ANALYSIS Qatar’s Council Election Has Gulf-Wide Implications Sep 30, 2021 ◆ Simon Henderson ARTICLES & TESTIMONY A Pro-Israel Summit in Erbil Breaks New Ground Sep 30, 2021 ◆ Dennis Ross BRIEF ANALYSIS Hurdles for the Iraqi Parliamentary Election Sep 29, 2021 ◆ Jasem Alshamary TOPICS Arab-Israeli Relations REGIONS & COUNTRIES Iraq Israel Jordan STAY UP TO DATE SIGN UP FOR EMAIL ALERTS 1111 19th Street NW - Suite 500 Washington D.C. 20036 Tel: 202-452-0650 Fax: 202-223-5364 Contact Press Room Subscribe The Washington Institute seeks to advance a balanced and realistic understanding of American interests in the Middle East and to promote the policies that secure them. The Institute is a 501(c)3 organization; all donations are tax-deductible. About TWI / Support the Institute © 2021 All rights reserved. Employment / Privacy Policy / Rights & Permissions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Automatic Exchange of Information: Status of Commitments
    As of 27 September 2021 AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION (AEOI): STATUS OF COMMITMENTS1 JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES IN 2017 (49) Anguilla, Argentina, Belgium, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Bulgaria, Cayman Islands, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus2, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Guernsey, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Isle of Man, Italy, Jersey, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Montserrat, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Seychelles, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Turks and Caicos Islands, United Kingdom JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES BY 2018 (51) Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan3, The Bahamas, Bahrain, Barbados, Belize, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, China, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Curacao, Dominica4, Greenland, Grenada, Hong Kong (China), Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Lebanon, Macau (China), Malaysia, Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Monaco, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue4, Pakistan3, Panama, Qatar, Russia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sint Maarten4, Switzerland, Trinidad and Tobago4, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Uruguay, Vanuatu JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES BY 2019 (2) Ghana3, Kuwait5 JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES BY 2020 (3) Nigeria3, Oman5, Peru3 JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES BY 2021 (3) Albania3, 7, Ecuador3, Kazakhstan6
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Border Security for Jordan: Assessment and Options
    <. -.. , ,. .. CMC ,, OCCASIONALPAPERS ., ...-. Cooperative Border Security for Jordan: Assessment and Options Colonel Mazen Qojas Jordan Army G CENTER .- -..., .,%.. ,. ,.,..< +-”-- ,. %---- “---- ~~ ,,. /“““ ‘-%. ---- “’\ >“’”””’“’ Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors. Printed in the United States of America. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from Office of Scientific and Technical Information PO BOX62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Prices available from (61 5) 576-8401, FTS 626-8401 Available to the public from National Technical Information Service US Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Rd. Springfield, VA 22161 NTIS price codes Printed Copy: A03 Microfiche Copy: AO1 SAND 98-0505/8 Unlimited Release March 1999 Cooperative Border Security for Jordan: Assessment and Options Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt & Jordan
    G E O T O U R S EGYPT & JORDAN JANUARY 24 – FEBRUARY 10, 2021 PALAWAN EGYPT & JORDAN = $2890 (16 days/15 nights in Egypt & Jordan) Included – Hotels, breakfasts, 3 lunches, 4 dinners, entries, flight from Cairo to Amman, transportation, guides, Matt and/or Suzan Ebiner as group leader Not Included – Airfare from USA (about $800); meals not listed above, tips to guides and drivers Highlights: Pyramids & Sphinx of Giza, Cairo (Citadel, Khan el Khalili bazaar, Egyptian Museum with King Tut’s treasures), Camel Ride to an old desert monastery, Nubian village and dinner, Luxor (Valley of the Kings and Hatshepsut Temple), Felucca (traditional sailboat) ride on the Nile River from Aswan to Kom Ombo (1 night sleeping on deck on the Nile riverbank); Jordan: Wadi Rum (desert safari and camp, Bedouin culture); Petra (ancient city carved into stone cliffs; one of the greatest archeological sites in the world); Madaba (Byzantine mosaics), Dead Sea (float in the saltiest, lowest body of water on earth), Amman (Jordan’s capital); Jerash (great ancient Roman city) Sun 1/24/21 Depart USA to Egypt Depart the USA for Cairo, Egypt Mon 1/25/21 Arrive Cairo, Egypt Welcome to Egypt! Two nights in Cairo at Pyramisa Suites Hotel (5*) or equivalent. Tue 1/26/21 Cairo Spend a full day in Cairo to enjoy some of Egypt’s highlights. Start at the Pyramids and Sphinx, and marvel at the most famous ancient site on the planet. For extra cost you can ride a camel or go inside the interior of one of the pyramids.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disi Aquifer: a Silenced Conflict Between Jordan and Saudi Arabia
    TheThe securitizationsecuritization ofof thethe DisiDisi Aquifer:Aquifer: aa silentsilent conflictconflict betweenbetween JordanJordan andand SaudiSaudi ArabiaArabia DisiDisi isis ¾ AA sharedshared groundwatergroundwater basinbasin ¾ AA nonnon renewablerenewable aquiferaquifer ¾ AA projectproject withwith aa heavyheavy environmentalenvironmental impactimpact ¾ FarFar fromfrom AmmanAmman andand consequentlyconsequently costlycostly OurOur theoreticaltheoretical toolstools ¾¾ TheThe securitizationsecuritization continuumcontinuum Non- Politicised Securitized Violised politicised ¾¾TheThe SanctionedSanctioned discoursediscourse ¾¾TheThe hydraulichydraulic missionmission conceptconcept ¾¾TheThe conceptconcept ofof “non“non violentviolent conflict”conflict” ¾¾SilenceSilence asas aa methodmethod ofof controlcontrol && powerpower ¾¾PriorPrior useuse conceptconcept WhyWhy DisiDisi?? ¾¾JordanJordan isis oneone ofof thethe countriescountries locatedlocated withinwithin Israel’sIsrael’s hegemonichegemonic areaarea ¾¾AsAs aa consequenceconsequence ofof thisthis ,Jordan,Jordan chosechose thethe optionoption toto embarkembark onon aa conflictconflict withwith SaudiSaudi ArabiaArabia thanthan openingopening aa newnew bargainingbargaining processprocess withwith IsraelIsrael ¾¾DisiDisi isis thereforetherefore anan effecteffect ofof dominancedominance dependingdepending onon thethe IsraeliIsraeli “hydro“hydro--HegemonHegemon status”status” TheThe politicizationpoliticization phasephase ¾ Disi was discovered in 1984 and until the 1990s geological and hydro-chemical
    [Show full text]
  • History and Culture.Indd
    History & Culture Table of Contents Map of Jordan 1 L.Tiberius Umm Qays Welcome 2 Irbid Jaber Amman 4 Pella Hemmeh Ramtha er As-Salt HISTORY & CULTURE12 ITINERARIES Ajlun Mafraq Madaba 14 dan Riv Jerash Deir 'Alla Umm al-Jimal 1 Day Tour Options: Jor Umm Ar-Rasas1. Jerash, Ajlun 16 ey Salt Qasr Al Hallabat Mount Nebo2. Amman (City Tour) 17 all Zarqa Marka 3. Madaba, Mount Nebo, Bethany Beyond the Jordan V dan Jordan Valley & The Dead Sea 18 Jor Amman Iraq al-Amir Qusayr Amra Azraq Karak 20 Bethany Beyond The Jordan Mt. Nebo Qasr Al Mushatta 3 Day Itinerary: Dead Sea Spas Queen Alia Qasr Al Kharrana Petra 22 Madaba International Day 1. Amman, Jerash, Madaba and Dead Sea - Overnight in Ammana Airport e Hammamat Ma’in Aqaba Day 2. Petra - Overnight in26 Little Petra S d Dhiban a Umm Ar-Rasas Jerash Day 3. Karak, Madaba and30 Mount Nebo - Overnight in Ammane D Ajlun 36 5 Day Itinerary: Umm Al-Jimal 38 Qatraneh Day 1. Amman, Jerash, Ajlun - Overnight in Amman Karak Pella 39 Mu'ta Day 2. Madaba, Mount Nebo, Karak - Overnight at PetraAl Mazar aj-Janubi Umm QaysDay 3. Petra - Overnight at40 Petra Shawbak Day 4. Wadi Rum - Overnight42 Dead Sea Tafileh Day 5. Bethany Beyond The Jordan MAP LEGEND Desert Umayyad Castles 44 History & Culture Itineraries 49 Historical Site Shawbak Highway Castle Desert Wadi Musa Petra Religious Site Ma'an Airport Ras an-Naqab Road For further information please contact: Highway Jordan Tourism Board: Tel: +962 6 5678444. It is open daily (08:00- Railway 16:00) except Fridays.
    [Show full text]
  • JORDAN, PALESTINE and ISRAEL Giulia Giordano and Lukas Rüttinger
    MIDDLE EAST CLIMATE-FRAGILITY RISK BRIEF JORDAN, PALESTINE AND ISRAEL Giulia Giordano and Lukas Rüttinger This is a knowledge product provided by: CLIMATE-FRAGILITY RISK BRIEF: JORDAN, PALESTINE AND ISRAEL AUTHORED BY Dr. Giulia Giordano is an Italian researcher and practitioner with extensive experience in the Middle East. She is now the Director of International Programs at EcoPeace Middle East, a trilateral organization based in Israel, Jordan and Palestine. Her research interests are Middle Eastern studies, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and environmental diplomacy. Lukas Rüttinger is a Senior Advisor at adelphi, working at the intersection of environment, development, foreign and security policy. He has published widely on these topics and was the lead author of the 2015 report “A New Climate for Peace”. PROVIDED BY The Climate Security Expert Network, which comprises some 30 international experts, supports the Group of Friends on Climate and Security and the Climate Security Mechanism of the UN system. It does so by synthesising scientific knowledge and expertise, by advising on entry points for building resilience to climate-security risks, and by helping to strengthen a shared understanding of the challenges and opportunities of addressing climate-related security risks. www.climate-security-expert-network.org The climate diplomacy initiative is a collaborative effort of the German Federal Foreign Office in partnership with adelphi. The initiative and this publication are supported by a grant from the German Federal Foreign Office. www.climate-diplomacy.org SUPPORTED BY LEGAL NOTICE Contact: [email protected] Published by: adelphi research gGmbH, Alt-Moabit 91, 10559 Berlin, Germany www.adelphi.de CORPORATE DESIGN MANUAL The analysis, results, recommendations and graphics in this paper represent the opinion of STAND VOM 08.12.2010 the authors and are not necessarily representative of the position of any of the organisations listed above.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions Of
    July 20, 2010 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E1377 I share Troop 463’s pride in being nomi- Had I been present, I would have voted in United States, and I believe all involved par- nated as a ‘‘Super Troop’’ for four years, three favor of H. Res. 1472, H. Con. Res. 126, and ties to ensure that the goal is a reunified Cy- of which have been consecutive. The Super H. Res. 1219. prus where Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cyp- Troop honor is bestowed upon the Troop f riots live together in peace and security. A which exemplifies the best in Scout Spirit, successful settlement effort must build on the RECOGNIZING THE 36TH ANNIVER- competitive edge, good attitude and dem- work towards a bizonal, bicommunal federa- SARY OF TURKEY’S ILLEGAL IN- onstrates a positive example to others. tion with political equality that represents U.N. VASION OF CYPRUS Madam Speaker, the young men of Boy Security Council resolutions. In the end, Cy- Scout Troop 463 have shown dedication to prus must have a single sovereignty and sin- their peers, their community, and their cause. HON. FRANK PALLONE, JR. gle citizenship which all Cypriots can enjoy. The Troop’s accomplishments reflect the best OF NEW JERSEY Now is the time for Turkey to show that they values of Scouting and should not go unno- IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES are willing to take a sincere approach to allow- ticed. Tuesday, July 20, 2010 ing a peaceful resolution to the dispute. The f Mr. PALLONE. Madam Speaker, tonight I leadership in Ankara must show that the will join my colleagues on the House floor to re- and support behind a peaceful settlement is in TRIBUTE TO LIEUTENANT the best interest of Turkey and that it is fully GENERAL R.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Human Rights Into Jordan & Lebanon's Construction Sector
    From Unacceptable Risks to Shared Prosperity Building Human Rights into Jordan & Lebanon’s Construction Sector 02 From Unacceptable Risks to Shared Prosperity Table of Contents 03 Executive Summary 03 Introduction ▌ Key findings ▌ Key recommendations 07 Context 10 The Company Survey 12 Survey Analysis & Findings ▌ Transparency & public commitment to human rights, including for refugees & migrants ▌ Ethical recruitment & freedom of movement ▌ Timely payment & fair wages ▌ Adequate protections for occupational safety & health ▌ Freedom of association ▌ Access to remedy & grievance mechanisms ▌ Engagement with Civil Society 16 Recommendations ▌ Companies should ▌ International Financial Institutions should ▌ The Jordanian & Lebanese Governments should Building Human Rights into Jordan & Lebanon’s Construction Sector 03 Executive Summary The construction sector in Jordan and Lebanon could be a powerful motor for employment, development, and shared prosperity in a region wracked by the impact of conflict in Syria. Tragically, there is widespread evidence that the sector is characterised by systemic abuse of workers, including refugees and migrants. Fatalities in the construction sector in Jordan are almost five times those in the United States; discrimination towards refugees and migrants is systematic; and workers of all nationalities face low pay, delayed wages, and long hours of unsafe work. Workers’ right to organise, or seek remedy for abuse, is generally supressed. The profound inequality of power between employer and employee in this sector is alarming and dangerous, especially in light of the lack of enforcement of labour laws that might provide some redress. Nevertheless, there are reasons to be hopeful for improvements. The sector is partly dependent on heavy investment from International Finance Institutions (IFIs) and donor governments, all of which have standards and safeguards which need to be upheld; governments in the region are eager to attract this investment and may adjust their policies accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 656 ISRAEL and JORDAN ^General Armistice Agreement (With Annexes). Signed at "* "Rhodes, on 3 April 1949 ISRAEL Et
    No. 656 ISRAEL and JORDAN ^General Armistice Agreement (with annexes). Signed at "* "Rhodes, on 3 April 1949 "p§?uA official text communicated by the Permanent Representative of Israel to Bfcil the United Nations. The registration took place on 6 October 1949. ISRAEL et JORDANIE Cbiivention d'armistice general (avec annexes). Signee a Rhodes, le 3 avril 1949 tyxte officiel anglais communique par le representant permanent d'Israel aupres ,de I'Organisation des Nations Unies. L'enregistrement a eu lieu le 6 octobre ,1949. 304 United Nations — Treaty Series 194| No. 656. HASHEMITE JORDAN KINGDOM-ISRAEL: GEN­ ERAL ARMISTICE AGREEMENT.1 SIGNED AT RHODES ON 3 APRIL 1949 ' Preamble The Parties to the present Agreement, Responding to'•• the Security Council resolution of 16 November 1948,2 calling upon them, as a further provisional measure under Article 40 of the Charter of the United Nations and in order to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, to negotiate an armistice; Having decided to enter into negotiations under United Nations chairman­ ship concerning the implementation of the Security Council resolution of 16 November 1948; and having appointed representatives empowered to nego tiate and conclude an Armistice Agreement; The undersigned representatives of their respective Governments, having: exchanged their full powers found to be in good and proper form, have agreed upon the following provisions: Article I With a view to promoting the. return, of permanent peace in Palestine arid in recognition of the importance in,this regard of mutual assurances concerning the future military operations of- the' Parties, the following principles, which shall be fully observed by both Parties during the armistice, are hereby affirmedr 1.
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL ANALYSIS SYRIA 28 March 2013
    REGIONAL ANALYSIS SYRIA 28 March 2013 Part II – Host countries Content Part II This Regional Analysis of the Syria conflict Regional overview (RAS) is an update of the February RAS and seeks to bring together information from all Humanitarian profile sources in the region and provide holistic MAP – Neighbouring Country Displacement analysis of the overall Syria crisis. While Part I Country page – Lebanon focuses on the situation within Syria, Part II Country page – Jordan covers the impact of the crisis on the Country page – Turkey neighbouring countries. The Syria Needs Analysis Project welcomes all information that Country page – Iraq could complement this report. For more Country page - Egypt information, comments or questions please Annex A – Definitions Humanitarian Profile email [email protected] Red flags indicate new information Regional Overview Over two years of fighting has forced more than 5% of the Syrian population to flee the country. By March, over one million Syrian refugees had registered or were awaiting registration with UNHCR and over half a million unregistered Syrians are estimated to be staying in Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt. In Lebanon alone an additional 300,000 Syrian migrants are in effect also displaced. This large-scale refugee influx continues apace outwitting humanitarian response Refugees living outside camps in all countries stay in rented apartments; with planning. While assessments are being host families; in vacant buildings or in temporary shelters. Across the region carried out and increasing knowledge their main challenges include inability to pay rent; difficulties in accessing exists on humanitarian needs, funding health care and a lack of employment.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Arab Emirates (UAE): Issues for U.S
    The United Arab Emirates (UAE): Issues for U.S. Policy Updated August 16, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS21852 The United Arab Emirates (UAE): Issues for U.S. Policy Summary The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been a significant U.S. partner in Gulf security, helping to address multiple regional threats by hosting U.S. military personnel at UAE military facilities and buying sophisticated U.S. military equipment, including missile defenses and combat aircraft. The alliance with the United States is expected to continue after UAE President Shaykh Khalifa bin Zayid Al Nuhayyan, who suffered an incapacitating stroke in January 2014, is succeeded by his younger brother and de-facto UAE leader Shaykh Muhammad bin Zayid Al Nuhayyan. With ample financial resources and a military that has long been advised and armed by the United States, the UAE has increasingly asserting itself in the region. The UAE has been part of a Saudi- led military effort to pressure the Iran-backed Zaidi Shia Houthi rebels in Yemen, an effort to which the United States provides logistical support but which has produced criticism over the effects of the war on Yemen’s civilians. That criticism has contributed to a July 2019 decision to remove most of the UAE’s ground forces from that conflict. UAE forces continue to support pro- UAE factions in southern Yemen and, alongside U.S. special operations forces, continue to combat Al Qaeda’s affiliate in that country. The UAE is supporting an anti-Islamist commander based in eastern Libya, Khalifa Hafter, who in April 2019 launched an assault to capture Tripoli from a U.N.-backed government based there.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq Situation
    Iraq Situation Working environment By September 2007, the number of internally displaced Iraqis was estimated at more than 2.2 million, with over a million of the total having been displaced since The context February 2006. The current rate of displacement is some 40,000 to 60,000 persons per month. The humanitarian The complexity of the operational, logistical and situation inside Iraq is dire and continues to deteriorate. political environment in Iraq affects UNHCR’s ability to implement its programmes for displaced Iraqis It is estimated that some two million Iraqis have sought both within and outside the country. The working refuge in neighbouring countries, mainly in Syria environment is further complicated by insecurity in (1.2 -1.4 million) and Jordan (500,000 - 750,000), Iraq, and the immense economic and social but also in Lebanon, Egypt and further afield. In challenges facing neighbouring countries hosting addition, there are more than 41,000 non-Iraqi refugees large numbers of Iraqi refugees. Most of the inside Iraq who have been equally affected by the countries affected by the Iraq situation have not violence and the deteriorating humanitarian situation. acceded to the 1951 Refugee Convention or its Palestinians, who comprise around 15,000 of the total 1967 Protocol. refugee population in Iraq, have been particularly hard hit. In neighbouring Jordan, 100 Palestinians, who fled Jordan and the Syrian Arab Republic are the countries Iraq and had lived in Ruweyshid camp for more than with the largest groups of Iraqi refugees and Palestinian four years, were resettled at the end of October 2007.
    [Show full text]