Obama for America December 31, 2007 Obama for America

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Obama for America December 31, 2007 Obama for America ObamaObama forfor AmericaAmerica DecemberDecember 31,31, 20072007 DavidDavid PlouffePlouffe CampaignCampaign ManagerManager Iowa – Crowd Size Comparisons All are post-Christmas, 2007 120 Nevada, IA 500 225 Davenport, IA 950 Webster City, IA 200 Edwards 330 Clinton Caroll, IA 400 600 Obama 200 Mason City, IA 400 650 100 Clinton, IA 200 365 0 200 400 600 800 1000 IOWAIOWA ••StrongestStrongest OrganizationOrganization inin thethe state.state. •• 3737 fieldfield officesoffices state-wide;state-wide; overover 200200 fieldfield staffers;staffers; thousandsthousands ofof activeactive volunteersvolunteers Iowa • Obama is positioned to be a strong second choice candidate. • Obama is strongest amongst those planning to attend the caucuses. • Obama is expanding into new universes throughout Iowa. Special Interest Spending on behalf of Edwards and Clinton $3,000,000 $2,618,852.98 $2,500,000 $2,086,039.53 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 $0 Obama Clinton Edwards On behalf of Clinton: AFSCME: $1,333,456.96; AFT: $799,618.59; Emily’s List: $485,777.43 On behalf of Edwards: Working for Working Americans/Carpenters: $526,440.76; Alliance for a New America (SEIU): $1,559,598.77; NewNew Hampshire:Hampshire: ●● FirstFirst TVTV adsads beganbegan SeptemberSeptember 25th25th ●● LargestLargest fieldfield operationoperation inin statstatee withwith 1616 fieldfield offices,offices, mostmost aggressiveaggressive door-to-doordoor-to-door operationoperation andand overover 100100 staffstaff • Nearly 1.6 million calls made • Over 330,000 doors knocked ● Strong volunteer base actively signing up thousands of supporters throughout New England ● Strong help from Governor Patrick in neighboring MA ● Big Independent voter block (at least 44%) that can vote in Primary and are more favorable to Obama. Obama has Closed the Gap with Clinton in New Hampshire, latest polls show Obama leading SOUTHSOUTH CAROLINA:CAROLINA: •African American voters could make up as much as 55% of the primary electorate. •First candidate to run ads on all 36 African American radio stations • Went on the air with state-wide television ads on December 18th. •Obama leads overall and with African American voters in South Carolina and wins more than 20% of white voters •Obama’s field operation is considered the best in the history of South Carolina with 11 field offices across the state and over 50 field staff •Even political veterans are impressed with what they are seeing of Obama's operation on the ground. In South Carolina, an early- primary state where 30% of the population is black, his young volunteers are out knocking on doors every weekend. "It is a new crowd," says former South Carolina Democratic chairman Donald Fowler, "and it is the most methodical voter-canvassing project I have ever seen in South Carolina." (Time Magazine, 9/27/2007) Obama has Taken Lead in South Carolina 45% 45% Obama 40% Clinton 35% 35%34% Edwards 30% 27% 25% 20% 15% 13% 10% 7% 5% 0% 9/6-9/10; LA 12/13-12/17, CBS Times/Bloomberg News NEVADANEVADA •Most offices open of any candidate, with 11 offices across the state •Largest field operation with over 50 field staffers •First candidate on TV, airing first commercial December 11th •First candidate to run state-wide Spanish language ads NEVADA: Obama Gaining Strength as Jan. 19th approaches 39% 40% Obama -18% 34% 35% -8% Clinton 30% Edwards 26% 25% 21% 20% 15% 10% 9% 9% 5% 0% 10/9-10/11 12/3-12/5 Source: Mason Dixon Polling Barack Obama Has Developed an Unprecedented National Grassroots Campaign Record Breaking Number of New Donors • 472,630 = total number of unique donors **(as of 6:30 pm, 12/30/2007) • 757,565 = total number of contributions • A total of 16,110 maxed our contributors, only 3.4% of all donors • Average of 1.6 donations per contributor • Senator Obama is the one candidate in this race who’s not getting any help from Washington lobbyists, special interest PACs, or the shadowy Washington-based organizations called 527s. He’s getting his support from ordinary Americans. February 5th 22 States have primaries or caucuses •At least $100 million will be necessary to fully compete in first 26 states. Obama will have the financial resources. •The Obama campaign currently has 32 offices open in 17 of the February 5 states. •Candidates need to start now to build organizations in the caucus states – MN-CO-KS-ID-AK-ND. We have offices open in all of the caucus states and are actively engaging our grassroots support. •Obama is first candidate to open offices and staff a majority of the Feb. 5 states. Accepting Public Funds Limits Capabilities Total Amount John Edwards Can Spend between January 3rd and the Democratic National Convention, August 25, 2008: $50,000,000 = Estimated Total Limit* - $32,745,299.97 = estimated Expenditures through Jan 3rd** = $17,254,700.03 *National spending cap through the convention: $50 million [CNN, 9/27/07]; Estimated Total Raised by Edwards = total raised through Q3, $30,121,494.26 + $10 million in matching funds + $7 million in estimated 4th quarter funds raised = $47,121,494.26 **total spent through Q3, $17,745,299.97 + estimated $15 million spent in Q4 GEORGIA: Latest Polling Shows Obama in the Lead 35% 33% 31% 30% 25% 20% 16% Obama 15% Clinton Edwards 10% 5% 0% 12/21/2007 Source: Atlanta Journal Constitution Poll, 12/21/2007 CALIFORNIA: Obama Gaining Momentum 60% 57% 50% 50% 49% 40% Obama 30% 30% 24% Clinton 20% 20% Edwards 16% 13% 14% 10% 0% Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Source: Survey USA in CA Electability •Barack Obama is the Democratic candidate with the most support amongst Republicans and Independents •A recent (12/12/2007) Zogby poll demonstrates that Barack Obama is the most likely to win next November: Obama is the only Democrat to Beat Every Republican in a Head to Head Obama Republican Thompson Huckabee Romney Giuliani McCain 0% 20% 40% 60% Source: (12/12/2007) Zogby poll Clinton Loses to 3 out of 5 Leading Republicans in a Head to Head Clinton Republican Thompson Huckabee Romney Giuliani McCain 35% 40% 45% 50% Source: (12/12/2007) Zogby poll Half Dislike Clinton; Obama Most Liked Among General Election Voters: Clinton already has higher unfavorables than Gore or Kerry at any point in their losing campaigns Candidate Favorability Favorable Unfavorable 60% 57% 54% 52% 51% 48% 45% 42% 40% 30% 20% 0% Gore 10/10/99 Kerry 10/16/04 Hillary Clinton Obama 12/14/2007 12/14/2007 SOURCE: All numbers from Gallup polling Independents Amongst the Democratic candidates Obama appeals most to Independent voters • Obama’s advantages over other Democratic candidates among Independents nationally demonstrate that he has the strongest change of winning in the general election. • Recent elections show that without winning a majority of Independent votes Democrats do not win. • John Kerry only won 49% of Independents and lost the general election in 2004. Obama Has Highest Favorability Among Independent Voters -9% + 22% 50% +16% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% Fav 20% Unfav 15% 10% 5% 0% Obama Clinton Edwards Source: Fox News Poll, 12/14/2007.
Recommended publications
  • Democratic Planning Group
    Correspondence – Democratic Planning Group Folder Citation: Collection: Records of the 1976 Campaign Committee to Elect Jimmy Carter; Series: Noel Sterrett Subject File; Folder: Correspondence – Democratic Planning Group; Container 77 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Carter-Mondale%20Campaign_1976.pdf DPG 11/1/74 "Advice to Democrats" from Lawrence F. O'Brien NY Times, 10/19/74 "Although party reform has not been a bed of roses for the Democrats, the Republican party has failed to engage in a comparable effort to achieve openness and to democratize its procedures. To date, there is no discernible element of reform within the Republican party and, in the political climate of Watergate, to maintain an attitude of politics-as­ usual is to court disaster ... "As a result of the (Democratic) party's new nominating procedures, we are now reasonably assured that our national convention will be truly democratic. I am inclined to believe that its very openness wi'll be extremely helpful in achieving the unity vital to success in 1976." "The Parties May Be Over" by David Broder Washington Pos�l0/74 " ... a series of studies by Jack Dennis, a political science professor at the University of Wisconsin, indicates... the ·erosion of popular support for the two-party system ... " ... three-fourths or more of the Wisconsin residents agreed that 'the parties do more to confuse the issues than to provide a clear choice on the issues' ... four out of five Wisconsin voters agreed that 'more often than not, the political parties create conflicts where none really exist' ... " ...When asked in 1964 if they believed 'it would be better if, in all elections, we put no party labels on the ballot,' 67% of Wisconsin voters disagreed ..
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Party of South Carolina Records, 1924-2008 Bulk, 1966-2008
    South Carolina Political Collections University of South Carolina Libraries Democratic Party of South Carolina Records, 1924-2008 Bulk, 1966-2008 Volume: 85 linear feet Processed: Originally processed by multiple staff members, c. 1988-1992; additions processed by Stephanie Stewart, 2004; reprocessed and significant additions added by Laura Litwer and Caitlin Mans, 2011-2012 Provenance: Donated by the Democratic Party of South Carolina Citation Form: Democratic Party of South Carolina Records, South Carolina Political Collections, The University of South Carolina Copyright: Copyright of the Democratic Party of South Carolina Records has been transferred to the University of South Carolina 1 Organizational History With roots dating back to the 18th century, the Democratic Party is the oldest continuously operational political party in South Carolina. However, the modern iteration of the party is frequently dated to 1876, when the election of Wade Hampton III as governor brought an end to the state’s Republican Reconstruction government and ushered in an era of almost absolute Democratic dominance in the state. As Don Fowler writes in the South Carolina Encyclopedia: Although there were vast differences of ideology, style, and sophistication among state Democrats, one overriding, enduring value and purpose held it together: maintaining a segregated party and society and ‘keeping the Negro population in their place,’ as well as an intense aversion to the Republican Party. Conflicts within the Democratic Party included elites versus populists, lowcountry versus upstate, mill workers versus mill owners, and conflicts of personality among political leaders. Without question, the dominant, controlling influence in South Carolina politics (and therefore the Democratic Party) was the established, conservative economic and social order.1 The Democratic Party of South Carolina (DPSC) exercised near-complete control over the state’s political scene through World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • A TEN YEAR REPORT the Institute of Politics
    A TEN YEAR REPORT 1966-1967 to 1976-1977 The Institute of Politics John Fitzgerald Kennedy School of Government Harvard University A TEN YEAR REPORT 1966-1967 to 1976-1977 The Institute of Politics John Fitzgerald Kennedy School of Government Harvard University 1 The Institute of Politics Richard E. Neustadt, Director, 1966-1971 The urge to found an Institute of Politics had little to do with Harvard. It came, rather, from a natural concern of President Kennedy's family and friends after his death. The JFK library, al­ ready planned to house his presidential papers, was also to have been a headquarters for him when he retired from the Presidency. Now it would be not a living center focussed on him, active in the present, facing the future, but instead only an archive and museum faced to­ ward the past. The Institute was somehow to provide the living ele­ ment in what might otherwise soon turn into a "dead" memorial. Nathan Pusey, at the time Harvard's President, then took an initiative with Robert Kennedy, proposing that the Institute be made a permanent part of Harvard's Graduate School of Public Administra­ tion. The School—uniquely among Harvard's several parts—would be named for an individual, John F. Kennedy. Robert Kennedy ac­ cepted; these two things were done. The Kennedy Library Corpora­ tion, a fund-raising body charged to build the Library, contributed endowment for an Institute at Harvard. The University renamed its School the John Fitzgerald Kennedy School of Government, and created within it the Institute of Politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Calendar No. 471 105Th Congress, 2D Session –––––––––– House Report 105–829
    Union Calendar No. 471 105th Congress, 2d Session ±±±±±±±±±± House Report 105±829 INVESTIGATION OF POLITICAL FUNDRAISING IMPROPRIETIES AND POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS OF LAW INTERIM REPORT SIXTH REPORT BY THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT together with ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS Volume 1 of 4 NOVEMBER 5, 1998.ÐCommitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed INVESTIGATION OF POLITICAL FUND-RAISING IMPROPRIETIES AND POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS OF LAWÐ VOLUME 1 OF 4 1 Union Calendar No. 471 105th Congress, 2d Session ±±±±±±±±±± House Report 105±829 INVESTIGATION OF POLITICAL FUNDRAISING IMPROPRIETIES AND POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS OF LAW INTERIM REPORT SIXTH REPORT BY THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT together with ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS Volume 1 of 4 NOVEMBER 5, 1998.ÐCommitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 51±332 WASHINGTON : 1998 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT DAN BURTON, Indiana, Chairman BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York HENRY A. WAXMAN, California J. DENNIS HASTERT, Illinois TOM LANTOS, California CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland ROBERT E. WISE, JR., West Virginia CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut MAJOR R. OWENS, New York CHRISTOPHER COX, California EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York GARY A. CONDIT, California STEPHEN HORN, California CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York JOHN L. MICA, Florida THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin THOMAS M. DAVIS, Virginia ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Washington, DAVID M. MCINTOSH, Indiana DC MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana CHAKA FATTAH, Pennsylvania JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida ELIJAH E.
    [Show full text]
  • Former DNC Chairs Urge Fellow Democrats to Support Trade Promotion Authority
    Former DNC Chairs Urge Fellow Democrats to Support Trade Promotion Authority March 26, 2015 To Fellow Members of the Democratic Party, As former DNC Chairs, we are proud to be leaders in a Party that seeks to strengthen the middle class and ensure America’s safety and security. To that end, we support granting Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) to President Obama. TPA originates from the earliest trade negotiating authority, passed by the New Deal Congress in 1934 and signed into law by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. During the last four decades Congress has granted every President, Democrat and Republican alike, some version of trade promotion authority. To continue this bipartisan tradition, we stand behind the head of our Party, President Obama, in his quest for long-standing negotiating authority that allows Congress and the Executive branch to work together to pursue trade agreements that benefit Americans across the country. Moreover, TPA will clear a path for the President to pursue his pro-growth trade agenda—an agenda that will move America forward. As Democrats, we believe in rebuilding middle class security by putting Americans back to work. America's trade agreements are delivering for middle class families and our economic security. Our seventeen most recent trade agreements have improved the goods trade balance by $30 billion every year—that is some serious progress. The United States exported $2.35 trillion in Made-in-America goods and services in 2014, our fifth record-breaking year in a row. The increase in U.S. exports has contributed one-third of our economic growth and added $760 billion to our economy between 2009-2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Files; Folder: 11/1/79; Container 138
    11/1/79 Folder Citation: Collection: Office of Staff Secretary; Series: Presidential Files; Folder: 11/1/79; Container 138 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Staff_Secretary.pdf WITHDRAWAL SHEET (PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES) FOR�M OF', DOCUMENT CORRESPONDENTS OR TITLE DATE RESTRICTION ,...� � ... telegr c:.-FiPln.. ,... IT1h ..... \ ........... am PrPRident (nn ...-- J • 10/31/79 A IJ./J./IJ· memo w/ P-t:om Brzezinski to 'f'he l!'Les±dent;(4 pp )--re-:"' 10/29/79 A att:.. Arig'OT;:r-tenc losed in 'tra tcfieson to�r:z:ezin!lki: '. � /lie �,_#{ r" tJLC- 12t- 11- .r .J...- � j ' FILE LOCATION Carter Pres:ide(Jial- Papers- Staff. Offices,. Office of the Staff Sec .. - Pres. Hand­ writing File 11/1/79 BOX 1:54 " RESTRICTioN <:ODES (A) Closed b� Executi�e Order 12356"governing access to national security information. (B) Closed by' statute or by the agency which originated the'document: (C) Closed in accordance with' restrictions contained in the donor's deed of gift. --�----�----------------- ��----��--------------�-----------------�-------�---���� NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATJbN NA FORM 1429 (6-85) THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON 11/1/79 Frank Moore/Ev Small The attached was returned in the President's outbox today and is forwarded to you for appropriate handling -- delivery. - _-... -- - �:'-" �- Rick Hutcheson ,--------- ---- -�--------- .· ·.:··- --- -- J - .. ...-:;·--·.:.. '·-: _ -:.-::--· _;___ _ .. ... --·�· ----··:--;-:: ___ _ ..:...= - . ..... ;-· . · ... .· ....::·. : •. :� .: -.: - .... .. - . I FOR STAFFING ,. FOR INFORMATION FROM PRESIDENT'S OUTBOX LOG IN/TO PRESIDENT TODAY IMMEDIATE TURNAROUND NO DEADLINE FOR APPROPRIATE HANDLING LAST DAY FOR ACTION - ADMIN CONFID CONFIDENTIAL SECRET EYES ONLY VICE PRESIDENT MILLER JORDAN �· VANCE CUTLER DONOVAN EIZENSTAT BUTLER MCDONALD CAMPBELL )< MOORE H.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Democratic Party Reform 1972 - 2008
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College 5-2012 The Democratization of the Democratic Party: An Analysis of Democratic Party Reform 1972 - 2008 Benjamin D. Goodman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Goodman, Benjamin D., "The Democratization of the Democratic Party: An Analysis of Democratic Party Reform 1972 - 2008" (2012). Honors College. 51. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/51 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY: AN ANALYSIS OF DEMOCRATIC PARTY REFORM 1972 – 2008 by Benjamin D. Goodman A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for a Degree with Honors (Political Science) The Honors College University of Maine May 2012 Advisory Committee: Mark Brewer, Associate Professor of Political Science, Advisor Rosemary Baldacci, Consultant, Phil Johnston & Associates Emily Cain, Maine House Democratic Leader and Honors College Coordinator of Advancement Amy Fried, Professor of Political Science Nathan Godfried, Professor of History Richard Powell, Associate Professor of Political Science Abstract Frustration over the undemocratic nature of the 1968 Democratic Party presidential nominating contest set forth a reform movement that forever changed the Democratic Party and America’s political system. The resulting Committee on Party Structure and Delegate Selection (better known as the McGovern-Fraser Commission), at the direction of the 1968 convention, opened the Democratic Party to those outside of the Democratic establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitutional Basis for a Ban on Soft Money
    Fordham Law Review Volume 67 Issue 3 Article 7 1998 The Constitutional Basis for a Ban on Soft Money Daniel M. Yarmish Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Daniel M. Yarmish, The Constitutional Basis for a Ban on Soft Money, 67 Fordham L. Rev. 1257 (1998). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol67/iss3/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Constitutional Basis for a Ban on Soft Money Cover Page Footnote I wish to thank my parents for their continuous support and for always being there for me. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol67/iss3/7 THE CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS FOR A BAN ON SOFr MONEY Daniel M. Yarrnish* "Judges and officers shalt thou make thee ....[Tey shall not] take a gift; for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous."' -Deuteronomy INTRODUCTION During President Clinton's 1996 re-election campaign, Democratic fund-raiser Johnny Chung funneled nearly $100,000 to the Democrats from a Chinese military officer named Liu Chao-ying.2 Ms. Liu was a lieutenant colonel in China's military and a senior executive of a Chi- nese aerospace company.
    [Show full text]
  • ! A^J.4R^%^Y Dean of the Graduate School AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION DURING CRISES in JAPANESE-AMERICAN RELATIONS in the EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY
    AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION DURING CRISES IN JAPANESE-AMERICAN RELATIONS IN THE EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY APPROVED: Major Professor Minor Professor rector of the Departm#n History ! a^J.4r^%^Y Dean of the Graduate School AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION DURING CRISES IN JAPANESE-AMERICAN RELATIONS IN THE EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Donald Fowler Nelson, B. A. Denton, Texas August, 1968 TABLE OP CONTENTS Page PREFACE , iV Chapter I. ORIGINS OP THE CALIFORNIA ANTI-JAPANESE AGITATION . 1 II. THE SCHOOL BOARD CRISIS DIVIDES AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION 39 III. FROM THE ALIEN LAND LAW TO EXCLUSION 70 IV. THE AMERICANS REMAIN DIVIDED ON THE ALIEN LAND QUESTION 92 V. WORLD WAR II: THE CLIMAX OF ANTI-JAPANESE SENTIMENT IN THE UNITED STATES 109 APPENDIX 115 A. The Japanese Question from Chicago Daily Tribune, December 6, 1906 B. The Japanese Adjustment from Saint Louis Globe-Democrat, February 14, 1907 C. Opinion of Newspapers Regarding San Francisco School Board Crisis and California Allen Land Law BIBLIOGRAPHY 123 iil PREFACE In 1910 the American humorist Finley Peter Dunne fore- cast that one day there would be war over Pacific supremacy between the United States and Japan, Although Dunne died in 1936, his prognostication proved to be correct. Japanese- American relations were extremely cordial before the Russo- Japanese War. After Theodore Roosevelt mediated the war, however, the Japanese were very disappointed in the results. In the fall of the following year, a conflict over the ad- mission of Japanese pupils to the schools of San Francisco incurred the wrath of the Japanese government, and many in America believed that war between the two countries was imminent.
    [Show full text]
  • 67 2D Session SENATE Vol
    105TH CONGRESS REPT. 105±167 2d Session SENATE Vol. 6 "! INVESTIGATION OF ILLEGAL OR IMPROPER ACTIVITIES IN CONNECTION WITH 1996 FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS FINAL REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS Volume 6 of 6 MARCH 10, 1998.ÐOrdered to be printed INVESTIGATION OF ILLEGAL OR IMPROPER ACTIVITIES IN CONNECTION WITH 1996 FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNSÐVOLUME 6 1 105TH CONGRESS REPT. 105±167 2d Session SENATE Vol. 6 "! INVESTIGATION OF ILLEGAL OR IMPROPER ACTIVITIES IN CONNECTION WITH 1996 FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS FINAL REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS Volume 6 of 6 MARCH 10, 1998.ÐOrdered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 47±006 WASHINGTON : 1998 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS FRED THOMPSON, Tennessee, Chairman SUSAN COLLINS, Maine JOHN GLENN, Ohio SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas CARL LEVIN, Michigan PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii DON NICKLES, Oklahoma RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey BOB SMITH, New Hampshire MAX CLELAND, Georgia ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah HANNAH S. SISTARE, Staff Director and Chief Counsel LEONARD WEISS, Minority Staff Director LYNN L. BAKER, Chief Clerk MAJORITY STAFF MICHAEL J. MADIGAN, Chief Counsel J. MARK TIPPS, Deputy Chief Counsel DONALD T. BUCKLIN, Senior Counsel HAROLD DAMELIN, Senior Counsel HARRY S. MATTICE, Jr., Senior Counsel JOHN H. COBB, Staff Director/Counsel K. LEE BLALACK, Counsel MICHAEL BOPP, Counsel JAMES A. BROWN, Counsel BRIAN CONNELLY, Counsel CHRISTOPHER FORD, Counsel ALLISON HAYWARD, Counsel MATTHEW HERRINGTON, Counsel MARGARET HICKEY, Counsel DAVE KULLY, Counsel JEFFREY KUPFER, Counsel JOHN LOESCH, Counsel WILLIAM ``BILL'' OUTHIER, Counsel GLYNNA PARDE, Counsel PHIL PERRY, Counsel GUS PURYEAR, Counsel MARY KATHRYN (``KATIE'') QUINN, Counsel PAUL ROBINSON, Counsel JOHN S.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoner's Lake
    Bulletin of the Kenton County Historical Society Website: www.kenton.lib.ky.us/~histsoc Email: [email protected] P.O. Box 641, Covington, Kentucky 41012-0641 (859) 431-2666 May / June 2008 I Bet You Didn’t Know Upcoming Programs Tidbits of Northern Kentucky History I bet you didn’t know for whose May 18, 2008 and June 8, 2008 funeral did Covington’s Reverend Morris Coers preside early in his The Northern Kentucky History, Art and Lecture Series continues career. with this season’s “Living Together In The Tri-State” theme. The May installment will be presented by Judge Ronald A. Panioto and Phil Coers, minister at Immanuel Ciafardini and will cover Italian emigration and influence to the area. Baptist Church in Covington from The program will begin at 2pm at Baker Hunt Art and Culture Center, 1945 until his death in 1960, is 640 Greenup Street, Covington. The June session will be held on the better known locally as the founder 8th, when Irish emigration will be discussed by David Schroeder. For of the Garden of Hope in Coving- additional information, contact Baker Hunt at (859) 431-0020. ton. Coers was born in Shelbyville, Indiana in 1909 and was educated The remaining schedule for the series is as follows: at the Moody Bible Institute in September 14th — African-American — Dr. Prince Brown, Jr. Chicago. After ordination, he was October 12th — Appalachian — Dr. Andrea Watkins pastor of various churches in Indi- November 9th — Latino — Sr. Juana Mendez ana and Michigan before coming to Covington, Kentucky. While in Indiana, Coers pre- Behringer--Crawford Museum — “Tot Tuesdays” sided at the funeral of famed gang- “Tot Tuesdays” is a fun-filled program geared towards preschool ster, John Dillinger, who had been aged children.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Course: Reversing the Organizational Trajectory of the Democratic Party from Bill Clinton to Barack Obama
    The Forum Volume 6, Issue 2 2008 Article 3 Changing Course: Reversing the Organizational Trajectory of the Democratic Party from Bill Clinton to Barack Obama Daniel J. Galvin∗ ∗Northwestern University, [email protected] Copyright c 2008 The Berkeley Electronic Press. All rights reserved. Changing Course: Reversing the Organizational Trajectory of the Democratic Party from Bill Clinton to Barack Obama∗ Daniel J. Galvin Abstract The enthusiasm for organization-building we observe today in the Democratic Party finds its roots in the 1990s. As the Democrats’ competitive standing declined, their approach to their party organization began to change. With a newfound desire to recapture the majority, Democratic Party leaders began to make sustained investments in their party organization for the first time in over forty years. However, while new electoral uncertainties created new incentives for party building, translating those incentives into change at an organizational level happened only gradually, in a piecemeal fashion. Tracing the efforts of Democratic Party leaders from Bill Clinton to Barack Obama, this article argues that party building is a collective, cumulative process that takes time, resources, and persistent attention. KEYWORDS: political parties, Democratic Party, party building, organizational change, Bill Clinton, Terry McAuliffe, Howard Dean, Barack Obama ∗Daniel J. Galvin is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Northwestern University. His re- search focuses on the American presidency, political parties, and American political development. He is the author of Presidential Party Building (Princeton University Press, forthcoming) and co- editor of Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State (NYU Press, 2006). The author wishes to thank Katherine Glassmyer and those who agreed to be interviewed for this project.
    [Show full text]