Political Economy and Colonial Ireland: the Propagation and Ideological Function of Economic Discourse in the Nineteenth Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Political Economy and Colonial Ireland: the Propagation and Ideological Function of Economic Discourse in the Nineteenth Century POLITICAL ECONOMY AND COLONIAL IRELAND POLITICAL ECONOMY AND COLONIAL IRELAND The propagation and ideological function of economic discourse in the nineteenth century Thomas A.Boylan and Timothy P.Foley London and New York First published 1992 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge a division of Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc. 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 © 1992 Thomas A.Boylan and Timothy P.Foley All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Boylan, Thomas A. Political economy and colonial Ireland: the propagation and ideological function of economic discourse in the nineteenth century. 1. Ireland. Economics. Related to politics. History I. Title II. Foley, Timothy P. 330. 941509034 ISBN 0-203-98129-4 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-415-06628-X (Print Edition) Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Boylan, Thomas A. Political economy and colonial Ireland: the propagation and ideological function of economic discourse in the nineteenth century Thomas A.Boylan and Timothy P.Foley Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-415-06628-X 1. Economics—Ireland—History—19th century. 2. Economics—Study and teaching (Higher)—Ireland— History—19th century. I. Foley, Timothy P., II. Title. HB104.B69 1992 330'. 09415' 09034–dc20 To Noeleen and Molly ‘I believe that, next to good Religious Education, a sound Knowledge of Political Economy would tend as much to tranquillize this Country, if not more, than any other Branch of Knowledge that can be taught in Schools.’ (Hugh Hamill, Schools’ Inspector, Cork, 1833) ‘[Political economy was] the only means which existed of rescuing the country from convulsion.’ (Richard Whately, 1848) ‘Political Economy is…a science at the same time dangerous and leading to occasions of sin.’ (John Henry Newman, 1852) ‘Modern Anglicanism, i.e., Utilitarianism, the creed of Russell and Peel as well as of the Radicals, this thing, call it Yankeeism or Englishism, which measure prosperity by exchangeable value, measures duty by gain, and limits desire to clothes, food, and respectability; this damned thing has come into Ireland under the Whigs, and is equally the favourite of the Peel Tories. It is believed in the political assemblies in our cities, preached from our pulpits (always Utilitarian or persecuting); it is the very apostles’ creed of the professions, and threatens to corrupt the lower classes, who are still faithful and romantic. To use every literary and political engine against this seems to me the first duty of an Irish patriot who can forsee consequences. Believe me, this is a greater though no so obvious danger as Papal supremacy.’ (Thomas Davis, 1840s) CONTENTS Preface vii Acknowledgements ix 1 POLITICAL ECONOMY: ‘A SCIENCE UNKNOWN 1 IN IRELAND’ 2 THE WHATELY CHAIR OF POLITICAL 17 ECONOMY AT TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN, 1832–1900 3 POLITICAL ECONOMY AT THE QUEEN’S 43 COLLEGES IN IRELAND (BELFAST, CORK, GALWAY), 1845–1900 4 EASY LESSONS ON MONEY MATTERS: POLITICAL 65 ECONOMY IN THE NATIONAL SCHOOLS 5 ‘TO THE POOR THE GOSPEL ITS PREACHED’: 97 THE DUBLIN STATISTICAL SOCIETY AND THE BARRINGTON LECTURES 6 ‘NEXT TO GODLINESS’: POLITICAL ECONOMY, 113 IRELAND, AND IDEOLOGY APPENDIX: BIOGRAPHICAL DETAILS OF 157 PROFESSORS OF POLITICAL ECONOMY AT TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN AND THE QUEEN’S COLLEGES (BELFAST, CORK, GALWAY) IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY Notes and references 171 Index 201 PREFACE This book developed from our ongoing study of Irish political economy, especially of the contributions of John Elliot Cairnes, and our involvement in the international research project ‘The Institutionalization of Political Economy: Its Introduction and Acceptance into European, North American and Japanese Universities’. Versions of chapters two and three will be included in the forthcoming volume for Great Britain and Ireland, edited by Istvan Hont and Keith Tribe, entitled Trade, Politics, and Letters: The Rise of Economics in British University Culture, 1755–1905, and published by Routledge. We decided to attempt a comprehensive coverage of the propagation of political economy in Ireland at popular as well as at university level. With the exception of the pioneering work of Professor R.D.Collison Black on political economy at Trinity College Dublin and on the Dublin Statistical Society (later to become the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland), not only is the field untilled, the very territory is uncharted. This is especially true of what is perhaps the most intriguing area of all, the teaching of political economy to children in the national schools in Ireland in the nineteenth century. As political economy was especially aimed at the lower classes we have addressed the activities of the Statistical Society, in particular its administration of the Barrington Lectures. Central to our study is the role of Richard Whately, Anglican Archbishop of Dublin (1831–63) and former Drummond Professor of Political Economy at Oxford. He founded the Whately Chair at Trinity, he was instrumental in establishing the Statistical Society of which he was president, and, as a commissioner of national education, he introduced political economy into the school curriculum, as well as writing the textbook Easy Lessons on Money Matters. Whately was the great evangelist of political economy in nineteenth-century Ireland. viii There was a widespread view that political economy was both little known and little respected in Ireland. Indeed this was seen as yet another explanation for Irish economic backwardness. We argue that in an Ireland divided socially, economically, politically, and denominationally, consensus was sought in the new discipline of political economy, claiming to be scientifically impartial and to be an incontrovertible form of knowledge which transcended all divisions. But political economy was ideological, performing the crucial function of defending the socio-economic status quo and, in the words of a schools’ inspector in 1833, tranquillising the country. It was a central part of the educational system, formal and informal, and a powerful instrument of social control, achieved not through coercion, but through the intellectual hegemony of a master science. The Great Famine of the mid-1840s was a critical turning point in the reign of political economy and its then inseparable companion, the doctrine of laissez-faire. There were vitriolic popular attacks on the discipline, both moral and nationalist. There was increased scepticism concerning both the validity and universality of its laws, and even calls to establish an Irish political economy. There was a concerted attempt by the authorities to defend the honour of political economy, but within a decade there was an increasing awareness that a political economy generated out of English ideas and experiences was unsuitable to Ireland. In the face of an unsparing moral critique, the prestige of political economy faded, its absolutist reign over. Irish resistance, especially to the doctrines of absolute private property in land and the sacredness of contract, was such that various Irish Land Acts had to, in effect, abandon them as the price to be paid for tranquillity. Political economy’s mission of assimilating Ireland to England failed; concomitant with its decline was an increased emphasis on Ireland’s difference from England. Political economy was unsuccessful as an instrument of empire, and Ireland was to be governed by ‘Irish ideas’. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We have incurred many debts of gratitude over several years in our reasearch for this book and a perfunctory mention here will scarcely serve to discharge them. We want to thank the James Hardiman Library, University College Galway (the Acting Librarian, Ms Pat O’Connell, and especially Ms Maeve Doyle), the National Library of Ireland, the Library of Trinity College Dublin, the British Library, the Bodleian Library, Oxford, the Marshall Library, Cambridge, and the Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. We are also pleased to acknowledge the facilities afforded us by the Research Centre, King’s College, Cambridge, the University of San Francisco, and San José State University. We are particularly grateful to the Development Fund in UCG, without whose financial support this project would have been impossible. We are also grateful to the Presidential Research Committee for financial services rendered and to the Social Science Research Centre, also in UCG. Both of us wish to express our gratitude for the Senior Fulbright Fellowships, which eased our paths financially and academically. We also want to thank the Royal Irish Academy and the British Academy for one of their Exchange Fellowships. We want especially to thank Professor R.D.Collison Black of Queen’s University Belfast for his generosity, his encouragement, and his scholarship. Dr Istvan Hont of King’s College, Cambridge has been very supportive, as has Dr Keith Tribe of the University of Keele. We are also grateful to Professor Dermot McAleese and Mr Antoin Murphy of Trinity College Dublin, to Professor, and Professor A.W.Coats of Duke University. Gearóid Ó Tuathaigh and Michael Cuddy, Mr Alf MacLochlainn, and Mr P.J.Lawless of UCG, and Professor James Walsh, Dean of the School of Social Sciences, San José State University. x We salute Ciara Boylan, age 9, for her heroic services to scholarship in reading Whately’s Easy Lessons on Money Matters and finding it ‘dry’. John Boylan and Jane Foley have yet to manifest an interest in political economy. Most of all we want to thank Noeleen Boylan and Molly Fogarty.
Recommended publications
  • Steven CA Pincus James A. Robinson Working Pape
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHAT REALLY HAPPENED DURING THE GLORIOUS REVOLUTION? Steven C.A. Pincus James A. Robinson Working Paper 17206 http://www.nber.org/papers/w17206 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 July 2011 This paper was written for Douglass North’s 90th Birthday celebration. We would like to thank Doug, Daron Acemoglu, Stanley Engerman, Joel Mokyr and Barry Weingast for their comments and suggestions. We are grateful to Dan Bogart, Julian Hoppit and David Stasavage for providing us with their data and to María Angélica Bautista and Leslie Thiebert for their superb research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2011 by Steven C.A. Pincus and James A. Robinson. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. What Really Happened During the Glorious Revolution? Steven C.A. Pincus and James A. Robinson NBER Working Paper No. 17206 July 2011 JEL No. D78,N13,N43 ABSTRACT The English Glorious Revolution of 1688-89 is one of the most famous instances of ‘institutional’ change in world history which has fascinated scholars because of the role it may have played in creating an environment conducive to making England the first industrial nation.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Economics in Great Britain : Development Outlook After Technological Revolution the 17Th Century
    History of economics in Great Britain : development outlook after technological revolution the 17th century Zhuravlev Andrey, teacher of history Yadrin Alexander, M.S., teacher of economics Karinskaya school, Moscow region, Russia The economic history of the United Kingdom deals with the economic history of England and Great Britain from 1500 to the early 21st century. (For earlier periods see Economy of England in the Middle Ages and Economic history of Scotland). After becoming one of the most prosperous economic regions in Europe between 1600 and 1700,[2] Britain led the industrial revolution and dominated the European and world economy during the 19th century. It was the major innovator in machinery such as steam engines (for pumps, factories, railway locomotives and steamships), textile equipment, and tool-making. It invented the railway system and built much of the equipment used by other nations. As well it was a leader in international and domestic banking, entrepreneurship, and trade. It built a global British Empire. After 1840 it abandoned mercantilism and practised "free trade," with no tariffs or quotas or restrictions. The powerful Royal Navy protected its global holdings, while its legal system provided a system for resolving disputes inexpensively. Between 1870 and 1900, economic output per head of population in Britain and Ireland rose by 500 percent, generating a significant rise in living standards. However, from the late 19th century onwards Britain experienced a relative economic decline as other nations such as the United States and Germany caught up. In 1870, Britain's output per head was the second highest in the world after Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • George Unwin: a Manchester Economic Historian Extraordinary
    gareth.jones Section name George Unwin: a Manchester economic historian extraordinary by T A B Corley 2002 435 Henley Business School University of Reading Whiteknights Reading RG6 6AA United Kingdom www.henley.reading.ac.uk - 1 - [SECOND DRAFT] George Unwin: A Manchester Economic Historian Extraordinary T.A.B. Corley University of Reading I George Unwin held the prestigious chair of economic history at Manchester from 1910 until he died in 1925. During that decade and a half, he built up the reputation of economic history in Britain by a unique combination of two distinct qualities. He is credited as having had one of the most penetrating and philosophical minds ever to be attracted to this discipline.1 He also brought to his research an intellectual rigour, involving a scientific approach through intensive study of original sources. His influence over the development of economic and social history was thus a far- reaching one. Even so, Unwin has been to some extent overlooked. He failed to be included among the worthies in the Dictionary of National Biography’s supplement for 1922- 30 (1937): an omission to be rectified in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (2004).2 However, he was given a two-page entry in the International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences in 19683, and all his four books were reprinted during that decade. A more extended treatment of his career, as the ‘Founder of the Manchester school of economic history’, by D.A. Farnie, was published in 2001.4 The present, somewhat broader, account of his life and professional achievements therefore seeks to demonstrate that Unwin is well worth recalling in a new century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the English Civil War on the Economy of London, 1642-1650, by Ben Coates
    The Impact of the English Civil War on the Economy of London, 1642-1650, by Ben Coates. Abstract. The purpose of this thesis is to ask to what extent and in what ways the economy of London was affected by the English Civil War. This w ill be placed in the context of the evolution o f London’s economy and society in the 16th and 17th centuries. Comparisons with the impact of the C ivil War on the economy of other parts of England will be made. The focus w ill be on the short term effects of the C ivil War. In the first part of thesis the impact on the economy of London of Parliamentary taxation, loans and contracts for Parliament’s war effort w ill be assessed, as well as the policies of economic blockade pursued by the belligerents. Subsequently the impact of disruption brought about by the English C ivil War on the major props of the London economy w ill be examined, namely London’s role in the internal and external trades of England, and manufacturing in London. It w ill be argued that the C ivil War caused a major economic crisis in London partly because the economy of the metropolis rested on its interrelationship with the test of England, and also because of its function as the capital as the centre for the social and economic networks of the kingdom. The Civil War disrupted those networks. However the impact of the war was limited because the disruption of the national economic networks was partial, and because different aspects were disrupted at different times.
    [Show full text]
  • Coffey & Chenevix Trench
    Leabharlann Náisiúnta na hÉireann National Library of Ireland Collection List No. 153 Coffey & Chenevix Trench Papers (MSS 46,290 – 46,337) (Accession No. 6669) Papers relating to the Coffey and Chenevix Trench families, 1868 – 2007. Includes correspondence, diaries, notebooks, pamphlets, leaflets, writings, personal papers, photographs, and some papers relating to the Trench family. Compiled by Avice-Claire McGovern, October 2009 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction....................................................................................................................... 4 I. Coffey Family............................................................................................................... 16 I.i. Papers of George Coffey........................................................................................... 16 I.i.1 Personal correspondence ....................................................................................... 16 I.i.1.A. Letters to Jane Coffey (née L’Estrange)....................................................... 16 I.i.1.B. Other correspondence ................................................................................... 17 I.i.2. Academia & career............................................................................................... 18 I.i.3 Politics ................................................................................................................... 22 I.i.3.A. Correspondence ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Governing England: Devolution and Funding 1 Governing England: Devolution and Funding About Governing England
    Governing England: Devolution and funding 1 Governing England: Devolution and funding About Governing England Contents Foreword 2 Akash Paun About Governing England 3 1. Funding England: a review of the issues 4 Iain McLean 2. How England is funded 11 Martin Rogers and Alun Evans 3. Equalisation, incentives and discretion in English local public service provision 35 David Phillips 4. An exploration of the issues raised by the move towards to 100% Business Rate Retention 53 Aileen Murphie 5. Funding combined authorities and city regions 63 Tony Travers About the authors 72 Acknowledgements 73 2 Governing England: Devolution and funding Foreword By Akash Paun Foreword The British Academy’s Governing England programme was established in 2016 to explore questions about England’s governance, institutions and identity. One central focus of this work has been the English devolution agenda, looking at how successive governments have tried (occasionally successfully) to devolve power to England’s cities, towns and regions. During the course of the programme, the Academy has hosted a series of events across England, which have informed the production of two previous reports. The first, Governing England: Devolution and mayors in England (2017), examined the ‘devolution deals’ negotiated between central government and local authorities since 2015, leading to the election of ‘metro mayors’ in seven English city-regions. The second, Governing England: Devolution and public services (2018), investigated the impact (actual and potential) of devolution in three important areas of public policy: health and social care, skills, and infrastructure. A common theme emerging from this past work is that devolution cannot achieve its full potential as a mechanism for transforming the governance of England so long as the system for funding public services and local government remains unreformed and highly centralised.
    [Show full text]
  • The Devlinite Irish News, Northern Ireland's "Trapped" Nationalist Minority, and the Irish Boundary Question, 1921-1925
    WITHOUT A "DOG'S CHANCE:" THE DEVLINITE IRISH NEWS, NORTHERN IRELAND'S "TRAPPED" NATIONALIST MINORITY, AND THE IRISH BOUNDARY QUESTION, 1921-1925 by James A. Cousins Master ofArts, Acadia University 2000 Bachelor ofArts, Acadia University 1997 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Department ofHistory © James A. Cousins 2008 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2008 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission ofthe author. APPROVAL Name: James A. Cousins Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title ofProject: Without a "Dog's Chance:" The Devlinite Irish News, Northern Ireland's "Trapped" Nationalist Minority, and the Irish Boundary Question, 1921-1925 Examining Committee: Chair Dr. Alexander Dawson, Associate Professor Department ofHistory Dr. John Stubbs, Professor Senior Supervisor Department ofHistory Dr. Wil1een Keough, Assistant Professor Supervisor Department ofHistory Dr. Leith Davis, Professor Supervisor Department ofEnglish Dr. John Craig, Professor Internal Examiner Department ofHistory Dr. Peter Hart, Professor External Examiner Department ofHistory, Memorial University of Newfoundland Date Approved: 11 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Declaration of Partial Copyright Licence The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 589 3 December 2014 No. 73 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 3 December 2014 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2014 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 283 3 DECEMBER 2014 284 Government’s £2,000 tax-free child care account will House of Commons create greater flexibility, provide more choice to parents and hopefully contribute to driving down costs. Wednesday 3 December 2014 Mr Llwyd: That is a step forward, but the Minister The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock will be aware that good, affordable child care is key to economic development. He is probably also aware that PRAYERS in the UK we pay far more for child care than most other OECD countries—40.9% of the average wage compared with 18%. In Sweden, by contrast, the figure [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] is 7.1%. Does he think that we have anything to learn from the Nordic countries in that regard? Oral Answers to Questions Alun Cairns: It is important that we learn from wherever good practice is in place. The greater choice will help to drive down costs, but it is important that we provide the WALES right level of care, and the quality of care is important. I have no doubt that the stronger role that parents have The Secretary of State was asked— to play in exercising that choice will also drive up the quality of care.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture in the UK 2019
    Agriculture in the United Kingdom 2019 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Northern Ireland) Welsh Government, Knowledge and Analytical Services The Scottish Government, Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services AGRICULTURE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM 2019 Agriculture in the United Kingdom 2019 Produced by: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Northern Ireland) Welsh Government, Knowledge and Analytical Services The Scottish Government, Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services © Crown copyright 2020 Cover image supplied by Remus86 via iStock by Getty Images 2 Contents Preface 8 Legal Basis Revisions National Statistics status Content of document Summary 10 Farm Structures Incomes and productivity Commodities Environment Trade Organics Food chain Chapter 1 Key events 12 Government and policy Global factors Animal Health Chapter 2 Structure of Industry 15 Summary Introduction Land use, crop areas and livestock numbers Numbers and sizes of holdings and enterprises (Tables 2.3 and 2.4) Age of holders Chapter 3 Farming Income 24 Summary Introduction Real term trends and summary measures in agricultural income (Table 3.1 and Figure 3.1) Summary measures by country (Table 3.2) Comparison of income measures in EU member states (Figure 3.2) Farm business incomes by farm type (Table 3.3) Distribution of farm incomes and performance (Table 3.4 and Figure 3.3) Definitions and explanatory
    [Show full text]
  • Navigable Waterways and the Economy of England and Wales: 1600-1835
    Navigable waterways and the economy of England and Wales: 1600-1835 Max Satchell1 1. Introduction “The advantages resulting from canals, as they open an easy and cheap communication between distant parts of a country, will be ultimately experienced by persons of various descriptions: and more especially by the manufacturer, the occupier or owner of land, and the merchant. The manufacturer will thus be enabled to collect his materials, his fuel, and the means of subsistence, from remote districts, with less labour and expense; and to convey his goods to a profitable market. As canals multiply, old manufactures revive and flourish, new ones are established, and the adjoining country is rendered populous and productive.”2 In a single paragraph, this anonymous contribution to an encyclopaedia published when canal building was at its height (circa 1806) encapsulates the interrelated benefits of navigable waterways. Numerous scholarly attempts have been made to specify the relationship between navigable waterways and economic growth in England and Wales. Typically, these have focused on the period between 1600 and 1835, when the network expanded most. However, with some notable exceptions, these studies are insufficiently grounded in the changing geographical and material realities of the time. To help fill that gap, this paper uses a new technology, GIS (Geographical Information Systems) Modelling, to lay foundations and explore more rigorously the relationship between navigable waterways, demography and economic growth in England and Wales. The paper proceeds as follows. The next section relates the expansion of the navigable waterways network in England and Wales to population growth and urbanisation. Then, the GIS Waterways model developed by the Cambridge Group for the History of Population and 1 Social Structure is described.
    [Show full text]
  • Phemister2017.Pdf
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. ‘Our American Aristotle’ Henry George and the Republican Tradition during the Transatlantic Irish Land War, 1877-1887 Andrew Phemister PhD University of Edinburgh 2016 Abstract This thesis examines the relationship between Henry George and the Irish on both sides of the Atlantic and, detailing the ideological interaction between George’s republicanism and Irish nationalism, argues that his uneven appeal reveals the contours of the construction of Gilded Age Irish-America. The work assesses the functionality and operation, in both Ireland and the US, of Irish culture as a dynamic but discordant friction within the Anglophone world. Ireland’s unique geopolitical position and its religious constitution nurtured an agrarianism that shared its intellectual roots with American republicanism. This study details how the crisis of Irish land invigorated both traditions as an effective oppositional culture to the processes of modernity.
    [Show full text]
  • The First 14 Items Are Volumes in the Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press/Routledge and Kegan Paul)
    Notes I have used the following abbreviations in the notes; the first 14 items are volumes in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press/Routledge and Kegan Paul). CW 1: J. Robson and J. Stillinger (eds), Autobiography and Literary Essays (1981) CW 2, 3: J. Robson (ed.), Principles of Political Economy (1965) CW 4, 5: J. Robson (ed.), Essays on Economics and Society (1967) CW 6: J. Robson (ed.), Essays on England, Ireland, and the Empire (1982) CW 8: J. Robson (ed.),^4 System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive (1974) CW 9: J. Robson (ed.), An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy (1979) CW 10: J. M. Robson (ed.), Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (1969) CW 12, 13: F. Mineka (ed.), The Earlier Letters of John Stuart Mill, 1812-1848 (1963) CW 14-17: F. Mineka and D. Lindley (eds), The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill, 1849 to 1873 (1972) CW 18, 19: J. Robson (ed.), Essays on Politics and Society (1977) CW 21: J. Robson (ed.), Essays on Equality, Law, and Education (1984) CW 28: J. Robson and B. Kinzer (eds), Public and Parliamentary Speeches (1988) CW 30: J. Robson, M. Moir, Z. Moir (eds), Writings on India (1990) HOPE: (C. Goodwin, ed.), History of Political Economy (Durham: Duke Uni­ versity Press, 1971-) JHET: (D. Walker, ed.), Journal of the History of Economic Thought (1978-) Wood: (J. Wood, ed.), John Stuart Mill: Critical Assessments (vols 1-4) (Lon­ don: Croom Helm, 1987) Hayek: F. A. Hayek, John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor, Their Friendship and Subsequent Marriage (London:
    [Show full text]