The Effect of the Triple Tibial Osteotomy Procedure on Cranial Tibial Subluxation and Internal Tibial Rotation: a Radiographic Cadaver Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Effect of the Triple Tibial Osteotomy Procedure on Cranial Tibial Subluxation and Internal Tibial Rotation: a Radiographic Cadaver Study THE EFFECT OF THE TRIPLE TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY PROCEDURE ON CRANIAL TIBIAL SUBLUXATION AND INTERNAL TIBIAL ROTATION: A RADIOGRAPHIC CADAVER STUDY Angus McMillan Bachelor of Veterinary Science A thesis submitted to Charles Sturt University of the Degree of Master of Veterinary Studies School of Animal and Veterinary Science Charles Sturt University NSW, Australia March 2020 1 Table of Contents Certificate of Authorship ......................................................................................................4 Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................5 Abstract ................................................................................................................................6 List of Figures .......................................................................................................................7 List of Tables .........................................................................................................................9 List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................9 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................10 2. Literature Review ..........................................................................................................13 2.1 Introduction to Cruciate Disease .............................................................................13 2.2 Anatomy of the Canine Stifle ...................................................................................14 2.3 Epidemiology of Cruciate Disease ............................................................................17 2.4 Non-surgical Management of CCL Rupture ..............................................................20 2.5 Surgical Management of CCL Rupture ......................................................................21 2.6 Outcomes and Comparisons of TPLO, TTA and LFTS ................................................26 2.7 Popularity of Tibial Osteotomy Procedures .............................................................27 2.8 Concurrent Meniscal Injury ......................................................................................27 2.9 Use of Loading Studies to Evaluate Proximal Tibial Osteotomy Techniques ...........28 2.10 Triple Tibial Osteotomy ..........................................................................................30 2.11 Conclusions .............................................................................................................34 2.12 Study Objectives .....................................................................................................35 3. Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................36 3.1 Study Design .............................................................................................................36 3.2 Limb Harvesting ........................................................................................................36 3.3 Loading Frame ..........................................................................................................37 3.4 Limb Preparation ......................................................................................................38 3.5 Limb Testing ..............................................................................................................41 3.6 Triple Tibial Osteotomy Procedure ...........................................................................43 3.7 Statistics Recording ..................................................................................................45 3.8 Statistics ....................................................................................................................45 4. Results ............................................................................................................................46 4.1 Sample and Limb Exclusions .....................................................................................46 4.2 Pre-operative Investigation ......................................................................................48 4.3 Effect of Transection of the Cranial Cruciate Ligament (CCL) ..................................48 2 4.4 Effect of the Triple Tibial Osteotomy Procedure (TTO) ............................................48 4.5 Wedge Accuracy .......................................................................................................51 4.6 Intraoperative Complications ...................................................................................51 5. Discussion .......................................................................................................................54 5.1 Sample Population and Exclusions ...........................................................................54 5.3 Effect of CCL Transection ..........................................................................................57 5.4 Effect of the TTO on the CCL deficient stifle ............................................................58 5.5 Wedge Osteotomy Assessment ................................................................................61 5.6 Persistence of CTS after Proximal Tibial Osteotomies .............................................61 5.7 Intraoperative Complications ...................................................................................64 5.8 Limitation and Future Directions ..............................................................................65 5.9 Conclusions ...............................................................................................................68 6. General Discussion .........................................................................................................69 6.1 Radiographic Cadaver Studies ..................................................................................70 6.2 The TTO as a Proximal Tibial Osteotomy ..................................................................71 6.3 Conclusions ...............................................................................................................72 6. References ......................................................................................................................73 3 Certificate of Authorship I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at Charles Sturt University or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgment is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by colleagues with whom I have worked at Charles Sturt University or elsewhere during my candidature is fully acknowledged. I agree that this thesis be accessible for the purpose of study and research in accordance with the normal conditions established by the Executive Director, Division of Library Services or nominee, for the care, loan and reproduction of theses. Date: Angus McMillan BVSc 4 Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge and thank the following people for their support and involvement during the course of my Masters candidature. Most of all I am grateful for Dr. Randi Rotne, Dr. Kieri Jermyn and Dr. Tania Banks for their encouragement, guidance and time in all aspects of the project from initial design through to the limb testing, assistance with statistics and multiple revision of drafts. Assoc. Prof. Kristopher Hughes my principal supervisor who helped navigate much of the bureaucracy of University research and for generally providing guidance and review throughout the project. Frances Paterson at the VCC who in addition to assistance with imaging was present for almost all the limb testing which was a morbid and thankless task. The staff at the SARH who always went above and beyond to help in whatever way was required – Nat McCraig, Leanne Barnett, Stephanie Browning, Jess Griffith and Kate Whalan especially. Thanks to Felicity Stanley and Tim Headon at the anatomy labs for their assistance with limb harvesting and storage. Dr. Jane Lord, Dr. Ali Montgomery and Dr. Martin Combs for their collegial support and friendship during my time at CSU. Finally my parents, Ian and Kate. Both endlessly supportive of anything I’ve ever done. 5 Abstract Cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture is a common cause of pelvic limb lameness in the dog. There are a multitude of techniques to address the instability associated with CCL rupture however recently the proximal tibial osteotomy techniques whereby the anatomy of the proximal tibia is changed to create an environment where an intact CCL is not required for stability have become generally favoured by specialist surgeons and the scientific literature. The Triple Tibial Osteotomy (TTO) is one such of these techniques however relative to its contemporaries, the Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy and the Tibial Tuberosity Advancement, there is scant literature published on the technique. A radiographic cadaver study was performed to assess the effect of the TTO procedure on the cranial tibial subluxation (CTS) and internal tibial rotation (ITR) that occurs in a cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifle. The study confirmed and quantified
Recommended publications
  • Effect of Proximal Translation of the Osteotomized Tibial Tuberosity During Tibial Tuberosity Advancement on Patellar Position and Patellar Ligament Angle Jack D
    Neville-Towle et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2017) 13:18 DOI 10.1186/s12917-017-0942-6 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Effect of proximal translation of the osteotomized tibial tuberosity during tibial tuberosity advancement on patellar position and patellar ligament angle Jack D. Neville-Towle*, Mariano Makara, Kenneth A. Johnson and Katja Voss Abstract Background: Cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency is a common orthopaedic problem in canine patients. This cadaveric and radiographic study was performed with the aim of determining the effect of proximal translation of the tibial tuberosity during tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA) on patellar position (PP) and patellar ligament angle (PLA). Results: Disarticulated left hind limb specimens harvested from medium to large breed canine cadavers (n =6)were used for this study. Limbs were mounted to Plexiglass sheets with the stifle joint fixed in 135° of extension. The quadriceps mechanism was mimicked using an elastic band. Medio-lateral radiographs were obtained pre-osteotomy, after performing TTA without proximal translation of the tibial tuberosity, and after proximal translation of the tibial tuberosity by 3mm and 6mm. Radiographs were blinded to the observer for distance of tibial tuberosity proximalization following radiograph acquisition. Three independent observers recorded PP and PLA (tibial plateau method and common tangent method). Comparisons were made between the stages of proximalization using repeated measures ANOVA. Patellar position was found to be significantly more distal than pre-osteotomy, if the tibial tuberosity was not translated proximally (P = 0.001) and if it was translated proximally by 3mm (P = 0.005). The difference between pre-osteotomy PP and 6mm proximalization was not significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Medial Patellar Luxation
    Allen L. Johnson, DVM, DACVS Alexander Z. Aguila, DVM, DACVS Russell L. Bennett, DVM, DACVS Kristin K. Shaw, DVM, PhD, DACVS, DACVSMR MEDIAL PATELLAR LUXATION WHAT IS MEDIAL PATELLAR LUXATION (MPL)? Patellar luxation is a condition in which the patella (kneecap) slips out of its normal location within the stifle (knee). It has been described as the most common congenital malformation in dogs, diagnosed in 7% of puppies, and can manifest in different types of luxation and varying grades of severity. In about half the cases, luxation occurs in both knees. Small-breed dogs are affected at 10 times the rate found in large breed dogs. In a normal stifle, the patella rides inside a groove located toward the bottom end of the femur (thigh bone). It is held in place by the patellar tendon, which attaches at the top to the quadriceps (thigh muscle) and at the bottom to Normal stifle (knee) in left image the upper end of the tibia (shin bone). The quadriceps, patella and patellar and stifle with luxation in right tendon are normally well-aligned and act to extend the lower leg. A dog with image. a patellar luxation generally has an abnormally shallow femoral groove and 1 – Patella in normal position there is a malformation of the system that extends the leg. 2 – Femur 3 – Patellar tendon This allows the patella to slip toward the inside of the stifle (medial patellar 4 – Tibia luxation) or toward the outside of the stifle (lateral patellar luxation). 5 – Luxated patella WHAT ARE THE COMMON SYMPTOMS OF MPL? The clinical signs of MPL vary greatly with the severity of the disease, ranging from non-symptomatic to complete lameness in the affected leg.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruciate Ligament Disease in Dogs Advice Sheet
    Cruciate Ligament Disease in Dogs Advice Sheet What is it? How is cranial cruciate ligament The canine stifle (knee) joint consists of disease diagnosed? an articulation between the femur (thigh Your dog will have an orthopaedic bone) and tibia (shin bone). There are two examination, which usually reveal signs of cruciate ligaments within the stifle joint a joint effusion (an increase in the amount called the cranial and caudal cruciate of fluid within the stifle), thickening of the ligaments which are fibrous bands that joint and muscle wastage. Manipulation provide stability to the joint during weight of the joint also allows the identification bearing and twisting movements, and of instability. Following orthopaedic resisting movement between the femur assessment, your dog will need to have and tibia during weight bearing. Cranial a sedation or short general anaesthetic cruciate ligament disease is a common for examination of the stifle joint to further condition that affects dogs. This ligament assess joint instability and for x-rays to be may degenerate with age, weaken and performed of the stifle joint, which can then then eventually rupture. Once stretched or be used to plan surgery. ruptured (torn) the stifle becomes painful and unstable for the dog. Sometimes we What are the treatment options for see traumatic ruptures, but in most dogs Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease? the rupture occurs in a ligament with pre- existing degenerative changes, often Surgical Treatment following minimal trauma. Surgical treatment for cruciate rupture is We see complete or partial ruptures. Partial commonly recommended as it typically cruciate ruptures are unlikely to heal and offers a superior outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture on Range of Motion in Dogs
    veterinary sciences Article The Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture on Range of Motion in Dogs Stefania Pinna * , Francesco Lanzi and Chiara Tassani Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064 Ozzano dell’Emilia (BO), Italy; [email protected] (F.L.); [email protected] (C.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-051-2097535 Abstract: Range of motion (ROM) is a measure often reported as an indicator of joint functionality. Both the angle of extension and that of flexion were measured in 234 stifle joints of dogs with cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture. The aims of this study were to investigate the correlation between CCL rupture and alterations in the range of stifle joint motion and to determine whether there was a prevalence modification of one of the two angles. All the extension and flexion angles were obtained from clinical records and were analysed in various combinations. A significant relationship was found between normal angles and abnormal angles; concerning the reduction in the ROM, a significant prevalence in the alteration extension angle was found. Of the 234 stifles, 33 (13.7%) were normal in both angles. These results could offer important insights regarding the influence of CCL rupture on compromising the ROM. This awareness could be a baseline for understanding the ability of surgical treatment to restore one angle rather than another angle, to address the choice of treatment and to help physiotherapists in their rehabilitation program. Keywords: range of motion; cranial cruciate ligament; extension angle; flexion angle; dog Citation: Pinna, S.; Lanzi, F.; Tassani, C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stifle Joint Is a Complex Joint in the Hind Limbs of Quadruped Animals. It Is the Equivalent Joint to the Human Knee
    Rachel Watkins, Meadow Farm Hydrotherapy, North Common, Hepworth, Diss, IP22 2PR The stifle joint is a complex joint in the hind limbs of quadruped animals. It is the equivalent joint to the human knee. Although the primary movement is like a hinge, the menisci (cartilaginous spacers) allow a gliding action during movement so that the axis of rotation of the femur relative to the tibia varies according to the degree of flexion. Medial and lateral rotation of the tibia is also possible. The stifle consists of three interrelated joints; the femorotibial, the femoropatellar and the proximal tibiofibular. There are four sesamoid bones: the patella, medial and lateral fabellae and the popliteal sesamoid. These sesamoid bones assist with the smooth movement of a tendon/muscle over the joint. The most well- known sesamoid bone is the patella, more commonly known as the 'knee cap' and is associated with the patella ligament. It is located cranially to the joint and sits in the trochlear groove of the femur. The joint is stabilised by paired collateral ligaments (which act to prevent abduction and adduction of the joint) and paired cruciate ligaments. The cruciate and patella ligament are articular ligaments which join bone to bone at the stifle joint. These ligaments are not a single structure but are made up of a bundle of individual collagenous fibres and spindle-shaped cells known as fibrocytes, with little ground substance (an amorphous gel-like substance present in the composition of the various connective tissues). These fibres are tightly bound together to form the ligament. In a healthy ligament the fibres are all intact with no indication of inflammation or degeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruciate Ligament Tears
    Cruciate Ligament Tears Anatomy The canine knee joint, known as the stifle joint, is similar to a human’s knee in many regards. The joint is made up of the femur (thigh bone), tibia (shin bone), and the patella (kneecap) that are firmly held together by ligaments. Ligaments are strong, dense structures consisting of connective tissue that join the ends of two bones across a joint. The function of ligaments is to stabilize the joint, like a hinge on a door. The stifle has two very important ligaments called the cranial (CrCL) and caudal (CaCL) cruciate ligaments (cruciate means a cross or crucifix) that cross in the center of the joint. The CrCL (known as the ACL in humans) restrains the backward and forward motion of the joint, in addition to inward twisting and hyperextension of the joint. CrCL is most commonly injured in dogs. In fact, more than 600,000 dogs in the U.S. have surgery for this problem every year. The stifle also has two half-moon shaped cartilage structures between the weight-bearing bone ends called the menisci. There are two menisci in each stifle, one on the inner side of the joint called the medial meniscus and one on the outer side of the joint called the lateral meniscus. The menisci add support to the stifle and also serve as shock absorbers by spreading the weight load. Effects of CrCL tear The top of the tibia bone, called the tibial plateau is angled downward. When the CCL is torn, weight-bearing forces causes the femur bone to slide down this slope.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Tibial Tuberosity Advancement and Meniscal Release on Kinematics of the Canine Cranial Cruciate Deficient Stifle During Early, Middle, and Late Stance
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 5-1-2011 Effects of tibial tuberosity advancement and meniscal release on kinematics of the canine cranial cruciate deficient stifle during early, middle, and late stance James Ryan Butler Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Butler, James Ryan, "Effects of tibial tuberosity advancement and meniscal release on kinematics of the canine cranial cruciate deficient stifle during early, middle, and late stance" (2011). Theses and Dissertations. 1812. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/1812 This Graduate Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EFFECTS OF TIBIAL TUBEROSITY ADVANCEMENT AND MENISCAL RELEASE ON KINEMATICS OF THE CANINE CRANIAL CRUCIATE DEFICIENT STIFLE DURING EARLY, MIDDLE, AND LATE STANCE By James Ryan Butler A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Veterinary Medical Science in the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine Mississippi State, Mississippi April 2011 Copyright by James Ryan Butler 2011 EFFECTS OF TIBIAL TUBEROSITY ADVANCEMENT AND MENISCAL RELEASE ON KINEMATICS OF THE
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Treatment of Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
    Licentiate’s thesis Surgical treatment of canine cranial cruciate ligament deficiency A literature review University of Helsinki, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 2012 Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Small Animal Surgery Jan Mattila, MSc Econ, BSc Vet Med Tiedekunta–Fakultet–Faculty Osasto–Avdelning–Department Eläinlääketieteellinen tiedekunta Kliinisen hevos- ja pieneläinlääketieteen osasto Tekijä–Författare–Author Jan Mattila Työn nimi–Arbetets titel–Title Surgical treatment of canine cranial cruciate ligament deficiency – A literature review Oppiaine–Läroämne–Subject Pieneläinkirurgia Työn laji–Arbetets art–Level Aika–Datum–Month and year Sivumäärä–Sidoantal–Number of pages lisensiaatintutkielma huhtikuu 2012 49 Tiivistelmä–Referat–Abstract Cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) deficiency is the leading cause of degenerative joint disease (DJD) in the canine stifle. The anatomy of the canine stifle is complex and the pathogenesis of CrCL rupture is not fully understood. Several competing theories on the pathogenesis and several techniques based on these theories have been presented mostly during the last 40 years. The main categories of techniques are intra- articular, extracapsular and osteotomy, of which techniques of the two latter categories are still widely in use. The uncertainty about the pathogenesis and thus the correct technique of repair may be a reason for the multitude of proposed surgical techniques and the lack of preventive measures. This literature review attempts to cover the main surgical techniques from the three categories of techniques which are currently or have lately been in use and to determine if a preferred method exists. Approximately half of the literature is from 2000–2012 and half from 1926–2000. The literature encompasses both the original publications of each technique as well as studies on the outcomes and complications of follow-up studies using larger populations of patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Patellar Luxation This Information Is Provided to Help You Understand the Condition That Has Been Diagnosed in Your Pet
    220 High House Rd. Cary NC 27513 Phone (919) 380-9494 www.vsrp.net [email protected] Patellar Luxation This information is provided to help you understand the condition that has been diagnosed in your pet. We find that many of the details that come up during the office visit can be overwhelming. By reading this at your leisure, we hope you will better understand the problem and be aware of how it might affect your pet, treatment alternatives, the care you will need to provide during recovery, and the expected prognosis. Please feel free to ask one of our VSRP team members if what is presented here is not clear. Anatomy, Function, and Dysfunction What is the patella and where is it found? The patella is also known as the knee cap. It is a large sesamoid bone that normally can be found within a groove, called the trochlear groove, at the lower end of the thigh bone, or femur, where it makes up a part of the knee, also called the stifle joint. A stout, broad tendon attaches the quadriceps muscle group to the top end of the patella. The straight patellar ligament joins the bottom end of the patella to the tibial tuberosity below the stifle joint. The patella has hyaline cartilage on its deep face where it forms a true joint with the surface of trochlear groove of the femur. The patella has fibrocartilage “wings” on both sides that rest on raised ridges on either side of the trochlear groove; the medial (inner) and lateral (outer) trochlear ridges.
    [Show full text]
  • ANATOMICAL, RADIOLOGICAL and MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING on the NORMAL STIFLE JOINT in RED FOX (VULPES VULPES) Samah
    International Journal of Anatomy and Research, Int J Anat Res 2017, Vol 5(4.3):4760-69. ISSN 2321-4287 Original Research Article DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.465 ANATOMICAL, RADIOLOGICAL AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING ON THE NORMAL STIFLE JOINT IN RED FOX (VULPES VULPES) Samah. H. El-Bably *, Nawal. A. Noor Department of Anatomy & Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt. ABSTRACT Background and Aim: Our study was an attempt to study the normal anatomy of stifle joint in the fox, that’s not recorded in any of available works of literature. Material and Methods: using dissection of the stifle, latex injection for its arterial supply as well as studying the normal Radiology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technique were adopted. The obtained results were photographed using Nikon digital camera 20 megapixels, 16X and discussed with their corresponding features of authors who performed earlier studies in other species, especially canine. Results: The articular surfaces, capsule, ligaments, and menisci of the stifle were described. The arterial blood supply of the joint also studied and mainly achieved through the descending genicular and popliteal arteries. Conclusion: this study was an attempt to help the anatomists in comparative studies and surgeons in surgical operations. KEY WORDS: Anatomy, Fox, Joints, Stifle. Address for Correspondence: Dr. Samah Elbably Assistant professor, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt. E-Mail: [email protected] Access this Article online Quick Response code Web site: International Journal of Anatomy and Research ISSN 2321-4287 www.ijmhr.org/ijar.htm Received: 28 Sep 2017 Accepted: 20 Oct 2017 Peer Review: 28 Sep 2017 Published (O): 01 Dec 2017 DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2017.465 Revised: None Published (P): 01 Dec 2017 INTRODUCTION allowed movement in three planes.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment Options for Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Dog–A Literature Review
    Scientific Works. Series C. Veterinary Medicine. Vol. LXIII (2) ISSN 2065-1295;Scientific ISSN 2343-9394 Works. Series (CD-ROM); C. Veterinary ISSN Medicine.2067-3663 Vol. (Online); LXIII (2) ISSN-L 2065-1295 ISSN 2065-1295; ISSN 2343-9394 (CD-ROM); ISSN 2067-3663 (Online); ISSN-L 2065-1295 TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR CRANIAL CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RUPTURE IN DOG – A LITERATURE REVIEW Cornel IGNA 1, Larisa SCHUSZLER 1 1Banat’s University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Timisoara, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 119 Calea Aradului, 300645, Timisoara, Romania Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract Cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) breaks in dogs can be treated by surgical and non-surgical methods. Choice of the treatment method of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dog continues to constitute a real problem for veterinarian clinicians. This topic has been the subject of many studies. The investigation of the speciality literature data concerning the surgical treatment options in the management of cranial cruciate ligament breaks in dog, remains in the conditions of an informational avalanche a present concern. The purpose of this study was to analyze additional evidence which have appeared in the literature in the period of 2006 - January 2017 and which advocate with concrete evidences in the favour or disfavour of a particular method of dog’s cranial cruciate ligament breaks treatment. Analysis of online searches using PubMed engine in 403 articles suggest that the data analyzed do not allow accurate comparisons between different treatment procedures of cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs and did not show significant differences and major changes compared to previous reports (from 1963 to 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Tibial Tuberosity Advancement For
    Veterinary Surgery 36:573–586, 2007 Tibial Tuberosity Advancement for Stabilization of the Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Stifle Joint: Surgical Technique, Early Results, and Complications in 101 Dogs SARAH LAFAVER, DVM,NATHANA.MILLER,DVM, Diplomate ACVS, W. PRESTON STUBBS, DVM, Diplomate ACVS, ROBERT A. TAYLOR, DVM, Diplomate ACVS, and RANDY J. BOUDRIEAU, DVM, Diplomate ACVS & ECVS Objective—To describe the surgical technique, early results and complications of tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA) for treatment for cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL)-deficient stifle joints in dogs. Study Design—Retrospective clinical study. Animals—Dogs (n ¼ 101) with CrCL-deficient stifles (114). Methods—Medical records of 101 dogs that had TTA were reviewed. Complications were recorded and separated into either major or minor complications based on the need for additional surgery. In-hospital re-evaluation of limb function and time to radiographic healing were reviewed. Further follow-up was obtained by telephone interview of owners. Results—Complications occurred in 31.5% of the dogs (12.3% major, 19.3% minor). Major com- plications included subsequent meniscal tear, tibial fracture, implant failure, infection, lick granuloma, incisional trauma, and medial patellar luxation; all major complications were treated with successful outcomes. All but 2 minor complications resolved. The mean time to documented radiographic healing was 11.3 weeks. Final in-hospital re-evaluation of limb function (mean, 13.5 weeks), was recorded for 93 dogs with lameness categorized as none (74.5%), mild (23.5%), mod- erate (2%), and severe (1%). All but 2 owners interviewed were satisfied with outcome and 83.1% reported a marked improvement or a return to pre-injury status.
    [Show full text]