DOCSLIB.ORG

'A Principled and Pragmatic Approach to Cases of Negligently Inflicted

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'A Principled and Pragmatic Approach to Cases of Negligently Inflicted ‘A Principled and Pragmatic Approach to Cases of Negligently Inflicted Psychiatric Injury Based on Corrective Justice and Kantian Right’ Martin Alan James Allcock LLB(Hons)/BBSc Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Law Queensland University of Technology April 2018 1 Keywords Negligence – Australia Negligently inflicted psychiatric injury Personal injuries -- Australia Liability – Australia Corrective justice Interpretive legal theory 2 Abstract This thesis considers a particularly challenging area of law, namely, negligence involving pure psychiatric damage. The courts have traditionally struggled to find an approach to the duty of care in this area of law which is able to set clear rules of liability which are not arbitrary or unfair. This is primarily because of the intangible nature of the injury suffered, complexity of causal mechanisms involved, and limitations in relevant scientific knowledge. The courts have for these reasons commonly treated such claims with suspicion and have adopted strict controls on the ambit of liability. Underlying the fears expressed by the courts has been the view that it has been particularly difficult to develop principles of liability of general application which will not result in indeterminate liability and an opening of the floodgates of litigation. Orthodox understandings of this area of law suggest that there are two broad solutions to this problem. The first is a generalised test of reasonable foreseeability as the only duty test, advanced on the basis that this is a principled approach which does not set arbitrary and unjust rules of liability. Whilst having the advantage of flexibility, this approach risks leaving liability too wide. The second proposes clear and predictable rules of liability in addition to a test of reasonable foreseeability. This approach regards the imposition of arbitrary rules of liability as a regrettable necessity in order to ensure that the cause of action is kept within manageable limits. Importantly, orthodox understandings do not regard the ideals of principle and real- world manageability to be concurrently achievable. It is argued in this thesis that when applied to claims of negligently inflicted psychiatric injury, Ernest Weinrib’s and Allan Beever’s corrective justice theories of negligence suggest an approach to the duty of care which represents a distinct approach to the duty of care in this area of law. Being based solely on matters relevant to the interpersonal morality between the parties involved, this approach is based on principle. At the same time, this approach has the advantage of clarity and predictability, and is able to respond to fears of indeterminate liability, an opening of the floodgates of litigation, and an undue burden being placed on defendants. As such, this approach challenges orthodox understandings with respect to this area of law that principle on the one hand, and pragmatism on the other, are fundamentally inconsistent goals of the law. 3 It is further demonstrated in this thesis that this corrective justice approach is grounded in the institutional history of the common law in this area. This approach provides a basis to understand and explain each significant expansion of liability seen in this area of law between Dulieu v White & Sons (1900) and the current leading Australian common law cases of Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2002) and Gifford v Strang Patrick Stevedoring Pty Ltd (2003). It is argued that not only is this approach consistent with the current common law position, but also that it represents an improvement on the current common law as it provides appropriate guidance for future applications of the law in novel situations. The civil liability legislation passed in the wake of Tame; Annetts and Gifford is also analysed from this perspective, and is shown to be arbitrary and unprincipled from this perspective. 4 Table of Contents Keywords ................................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... 5 Statement of Original Authorship ............................................................................................ 10 Acknowledgments.................................................................................................................... 11 Publications .............................................................................................................................. 12 PART I INTRODUCTION 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Introduction to this thesis ............................................................................................. 13 1.2 The law with respect to negligently inflicted psychiatric injury: an apparent trade-off between principle and pragmatism............................................................................... 16 1.3 An approach to cases of negligently inflicted psychiatric injury which is both principled and pragmatic .............................................................................................. 27 1.3.1 Why a theory based on corrective justice? ....................................................... 29 1.3.2 Why Beever’s corrective justice theory? ......................................................... 31 1.4 Research hypothesis ..................................................................................................... 35 1.5 Selection of cases for analysis...................................................................................... 38 1.6 Framework of this thesis .............................................................................................. 41 1.7 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 43 PART II THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 2 WEINRIB’S AND BEEVER’S CORRECTIVE JUSTICE THEORIES OF NEGLIGENCE .......................................................................................................... 45 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 45 2.2 Beever’s principled approach to the law of negligence ............................................... 45 2.3 Implications for cases where the risk of particular injuries as a result of particular actions may not be appreciable in the general community ......................................... 57 2.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 59 5 3 CRITIQUE AND DEFENCE OF WEINRIB’S AND BEEVER’S CORRECTIVE JUSTICE THEORIES ............................................................................................... 60 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 60 3.2 Common criticisms of Weinrib’s and Beever’s theories ............................................. 61 3.2.1 Theory does not reflect law as it actually exists – interpretive theory tautological .......................................................................................................................... 62 3.2.2 No meaningful distinction between principle and policy ................................. 66 3.2.3 Rights analysis ambiguous ............................................................................... 72 3.2.4 Rights analysis external to the law ................................................................... 74 3.2.5 Rights analysis not apolitical ............................................................................ 76 3.3 Disagreement about the conditions of legal validity – the argument from theoretical disagreement ................................................................................................................ 78 3.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 82 4 AN APPROACH TO CASES OF NEGLIGENTLY INFLICTED PSYCHIATRIC INJURY WHICH IS BOTH PRINCIPLED AND PRAGMATIC ........................ 84 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 84 4.2 Existence of a right to psychological integrity ............................................................. 85 4.3 Normative limits of a right to psychological integrity ................................................. 90 4.3.1 The ability to appreciate risk ............................................................................ 93 4.3.1.1 Changes in brain physiology not necessarily ‘injuries’ ..................... 94 4.3.1.2 No unequivocal medical tests indicating cause ................................. 95 4.3.1.3 Range of responses to trauma ............................................................ 96 4.3.1.4 Causal explanations differ between disorders ................................... 98 4.3.1.5 A larger combined right to physical and psychological integrity ………….………………………………………………………….... 98 4.3.2 Common perceptions of risk relevant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inaugural Speeches in the NSW Parliament Briefing Paper No 4/2013 by Gareth Griffith
    Inaugural speeches in the NSW Parliament Briefing Paper No 4/2013 by Gareth Griffith ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The author would like to thank officers from both Houses for their comments on a draft of this paper, in particular Stephanie Hesford and Jonathan Elliott from the Legislative Assembly and Stephen Frappell and Samuel Griffith from the Legislative Council. Thanks, too, to Lenny Roth and Greig Tillotson for their comments and advice. Any errors are the author’s responsibility. ISSN 1325-5142 ISBN 978 0 7313 1900 8 May 2013 © 2013 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior consent from the Manager, NSW Parliamentary Research Service, other than by Members of the New South Wales Parliament in the course of their official duties. Inaugural speeches in the NSW Parliament by Gareth Griffith NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Gareth Griffith (BSc (Econ) (Hons), LLB (Hons), PhD), Manager, Politics & Government/Law .......................................... (02) 9230 2356 Lenny Roth (BCom, LLB), Acting Senior Research Officer, Law ............................................ (02) 9230 3085 Lynsey Blayden (BA, LLB (Hons)), Research Officer, Law ................................................................. (02) 9230 3085 Talina Drabsch (BA, LLB (Hons)), Research Officer, Social Issues/Law ........................................... (02) 9230 2484 Jack Finegan (BA (Hons), MSc), Research Officer, Environment/Planning..................................... (02) 9230 2906 Daniel Montoya (BEnvSc (Hons), PhD), Research Officer, Environment/Planning ..................................... (02) 9230 2003 John Wilkinson (MA, PhD), Research Officer, Economics ...................................................... (02) 9230 2006 Should Members or their staff require further information about this publication please contact the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Situating Women Judges on the High Court of Australia: Not Just Men in Skirts?
    Situating Women Judges on the High Court of Australia: Not Just Men in Skirts? Kcasey McLoughlin BA (Hons) LLB (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, the University of Newcastle January 2016 Statement of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University's Digital Repository, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Kcasey McLoughlin ii Acknowledgments I am most grateful to my principal supervisor, Jim Jose, for his unswerving patience, willingness to share his expertise and for the care and respect he has shown for my ideas. His belief in challenging disciplinary boundaries, and seemingly limitless generosity in mentoring others to do so has sustained me and this thesis. I am honoured to have been in receipt of his friendship, and owe him an enormous debt of gratitude for his unstinting support, assistance and encouragement. I am also grateful to my co-supervisor, Katherine Lindsay, for generously sharing her expertise in Constitutional Law and for fostering my interest in the High Court of Australia and the judges who sit on it. Her enthusiasm, very helpful advice and intellectual guidance were instrumental motivators in completing the thesis. The Faculty of Business and Law at the University of Newcastle has provided a supportive, collaborative and intellectual space to share and debate my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Leadership—Perspectives and Practices
    Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Edited by Paul ‘t Hart and John Uhr Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/public_leadership _citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Public leadership pespectives and practices [electronic resource] / editors, Paul ‘t Hart, John Uhr. ISBN: 9781921536304 (pbk.) 9781921536311 (pdf) Series: ANZSOG series Subjects: Leadership Political leadership Civic leaders. Community leadership Other Authors/Contributors: Hart, Paul ‘t. Uhr, John, 1951- Dewey Number: 303.34 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by John Butcher Images comprising the cover graphic used by permission of: Victorian Department of Planning and Community Development Australian Associated Press Australian Broadcasting Corporation Scoop Media Group (www.scoop.co.nz) Cover graphic based on M. C. Escher’s Hand with Reflecting Sphere, 1935 (Lithograph). Printed by University Printing Services, ANU Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2008 ANU E Press John Wanna, Series Editor Professor John Wanna is the Sir John Bunting Chair of Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences at The Australian National University. He is the director of research for the Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG).
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Journeys to Cameron's Farm
    Ten Journeys to Cameron’s Farm An Australian Tragedy Ten Journeys to Cameron’s Farm An Australian Tragedy Cameron Hazlehurst Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Hazlehurst, Cameron, 1941- author. Title: Ten Journeys to Cameron’s Farm / Cameron Hazlehurst. ISBN: 9781925021004 (paperback) 9781925021011 (ebook) Subjects: Menzies, Robert, Sir, 1894-1978. Aircraft accidents--Australian Capital Territory--Canberra. World War, 1939-1945--Australia--History. Australia--Politics and government--1901-1945. Australia--Biography. Australia--History--1901-1945. Dewey Number: 320.994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press Printed by Griffin Press © Flaxton Mill House Pty Ltd 2013 and 2015 Cover design and layout © 2013 ANU E Press Cover design and layout © 2015 ANU Press Contents Part 1 Prologue 13 August 1940 . ix 1 . Augury . 1 2 . Leadership, politics, and war . 3 Part 2 The Journeys 3 . A crew assembles: Charlie Crosdale and Jack Palmer . 29 4 . Second seat: Dick Wiesener . 53 5 . His father’s son: Bob Hitchcock . 71 6 . ‘A very sound pilot’?: Bob Hitchcock (II) . 99 7 . Passenger complement . 131 8 . The General: Brudenell White (I) . 139 9 . Call and recall: Brudenell White (II) . 161 10 . The Brigadier: Geoff Street . 187 11 .
    [Show full text]
  • P~~Ielnfiiw &Eeemhlg
    p~~ielnfiiw&eeemhlg Wednesday, 8 September, 1976 Petitions-Questions without Notice-Precedence of Business--Governor's Speech: Address in Reply (Eighth Day's Debate)-Ombudsman (Amendment) Bill (Int.) -Public Works and Other Acts (Interest Rates) Amendment Bill (Int.)-Cen- tenary Celebration (Amendment) Bill (1nt.)-Young Men's Christian Association of Sydney Incorporation (Amendment) Bill (1nt.)-Church of England Trust Property (Amendment) Bill (1nt.)-Statute Law Revision Bill (1nt.)-Interpre- tation (Amendment) Bill (1nt.)-Administrative Changes Bill (1nt.)-Youth and Community Services (Amendment) Bill (1nt.)-Technical and Further Education (Amendment) Bill (Int. )- Department of Agriculture (Repeal) Bill (Int.) -Mis- cellaneous Acts (Transport Legislation) Amendment Bill (1nt.)-Constitution (Ministers of the Crown) Amendment Bill (1nt.)-Ministers of the Crown (Amendment) Bill (1nt.)-Acts Reprinting (Amendment) Bill (1nt.)-Restraints of Trade Bill (1nt.)-Industrial Arbitration (Amendment) Bill (1nt.)-Miscel- laneous Acts (Insp~tors)Amendment Bill (1nt.)-Wheat Industw Stabilisation (Amendment) Bill (1nt.)-Teaching Service (Amendment) Bill (1nt.)-Federa- tion of Parents and Citizens Associations of N.S.W. Incorporation Bill (1nt.)- Friendly Societies (Amendment) Bill (1nt.)-Prices Regulations (Amendment) Bill (1nt.)-Allocation of Time for Discussion-Adjournment (Lyne Park, Rose Bay)-Questions upon Notice. Mr Speaker (The Hon. Lawrence Borthwick Kelly) took the chair at 2.15 p.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. PETITIONS The Clerk announced that the following petitions had been lodged for presenta- tion and that copies would be referred to' the appropriate Ministers: Sunday Hotel Trading The Petition of the undersigned Electors in the State of New South Wales respectfully sheweth: (1) A referendum on Sunday Trading in hotels was held in New South Wales in the year 1969 which showed an overwhelming majority voting against Sunday Trading in hotels.
    [Show full text]
  • Nothing Is Impossible
    Nothing Is Impossible Adventures in cerebral palsy By Neil McLeod www.thespasticcentre.com.au © The Spastic Centre, 2007 From an unpublished manuscript, 1986 Our gratitude to Jan Bradbury for her work in the preparation of this book. Cover photograph: Image from early brochure of The Spastic Centre ISBN 1876564091 The Spastic Centre 189 Allambie Road Allambie Heights NSW 2100 T 02 9451 9022 F 02 9451 4877 E [email protected] W www.thespasticcentre.com.au 2 Foreword This is the story of two unique people, Audrie and Neil McLeod, who struggled against the prevailing beliefs of a particular time in Australian history to find causes and solutions for cerebral palsy. It documents the growth of an organisation that would provide the template for so many families also facing the issues resulting from the disabilities of their children. It shows what can happen when the community understands and responds to a call for justice for some of its most vulnerable members. The Spastic Centre of New South Wales could never have come into existence without the collective power of parents who challenged the status quo which treated them as victims and who were determined that the needs of their child would not be dismissed nor neglected. It is also an Australian expression of the story of mateship, of a ‘fair go’, of people supporting and nurturing each other, of community development, of conflict, turbulence and change. This is the story of my family – particularly my sister, Jennifer, who started my parents on their life pathways. Robin Way 2006 Acknowledgement The first version of this book was published by the Simul Press in Japan in 1994 as a consequence of the deep and enduring ties formed between The Spastic Centre of NSW and the McLeod Society of Japan, in particular the late Mr Takeo Noda, Dr Takahashi, and Professor Ohtsuka.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Negligence and Mental Harm: Practitioner Perspectives on Challenges in Litigation and Mediation
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RMIT Research Repository Medical Negligence and Mental Harm: Practitioner Perspectives on Challenges in Litigation and Mediation A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Martina Popa LLB (Hons) (VU), GDLP (LCI), LLM (Melb) Australian Lawyer, Supreme Court of Victoria Graduate School of Business and Law College of Business RMIT University January 2018 i DECLARATION I certify that except where due acknowledgement has been made, the work is that of the author alone; the work has not been submitted previously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award; the content of the thesis/project is the result of work which has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved research program; any editorial work, paid or unpaid, carried out by a third party is acknowledged; and, ethics procedures and guidelines have been followed. I acknowledge the support I have received for my research through the provision of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Martina Popa January 2018 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Researching and writing this thesis has been a challenging and rewarding three year journey, and there are many people I would like to thank for their support and assistance. Thank you to my senior supervisor Associate Professor Kathy Douglas and my associate supervisor Dr Andrew Vaitiekunas for your guidance, feedback, support and mentorship. Your knowledge and experience has been invaluable in assisting me throughout my candidature. Thank you to my research participants who took time out of their busy schedules to speak to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Law in Theory and Practice
    Private Law in Theory and Practice Private Law in Theory and Practice explores important theoretical issues in tort law, the law of contract and the law of unjust enrichment, and relates the theory to judicial decision making in these areas of private law. Topics covered include the politics and philosophy of tort law reform, the role of good faith in contract law, comparative perspectives on setting aside con- tracts for mistake, and the theory and practice of proprietary remedies in the law of unjust enrichment. Contributors to the book bring a variety of theoretical perspectives to bear on the analysis of private law. They include: economic analysis, corrective justice theory, comparative analysis of law, socio-legal inquiry, social history, political theory as well as doctrinal analysis of the law. In all cases the theor- etical approaches are applied to recent case law developments in England, Australia and Canada, and, in the case of tort law, proposals in all these jurisdictions to reform the law. The book aims to present the theory of private law, and the application of theory to practical legal problems in an accessible form to teachers and students of tort, contract and the law of unjust enrichment, legal researchers and law reformers. Michael Bryan is Professor of Law at the University of Melbourne. He has researched and published extensively in the areas of equity, trusts and restitu- tion, including The Law of Non-Disclosure (with A. Duggan and F. Hanks: Longman, 1995) and contributed a chapter to The Law of Obligations: Connections and Boundaries (UCL Press, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • State Council Council Regional CSC Platform
    History | Beliefs | Structure | Leaders | Getting Involved Welcome to the Liberal Party of Australia New South Wales Division The History of the Party Our Beliefs We Believe What we must look for, in the inalienable rights and freedoms of all people: we work towards a lean government that minimises and it is a matter of desperate interference in our daily lives and maximises individual and private-sector initiative; in government that nurtures and encourages its citizens through initiative, rather than putting limits on importance to our society, people through the punishing disincentive of burdensome taxes and the stifling structures of Labor’s is a true revival of liberal corporate state and bureaucratic red tape; in those most basic freedoms of parliamentary democracy – the freedom of thought, worship, speech and thought which will work for association; social justice and security, for in a just and humane society in which the importance of the family and the role of law and justice are maintained; national power and national in equal opportunity and tolerance for all Australians; progress, and for the full in the encouragement and the facilitation of wealth so that all may enjoy the highest possible standards of development of the individual living, health, education and social justice; citizen, though not through the that, wherever possible, government should not compete with an efficient private sector, and that businesses and individuals – not government – are the true creators of wealth and employment; dull and deadening process in the Australian Constitution; of socialism. in preserving Australia’s natural beauty and environment for future generations; and that our nation has a constructive role to play in maintaining world peace and democracy through alliances Sir Robert Gordon Menzies with other free nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Alj @ 80: Past, Present & Future*
    ALJ @ 80: PAST, PRESENT & FUTURE* The Hon Justice Michael Kirby AC CMG** PAST & PRESENT National journal of record: The ALJ is 80. The British Empire was at its zenith in 1927 when the first issue was published. The Empire packed its colonial judges off home at 65, doubtless fearing that the midday sun would addle older brains. To this day, judges in most parts of the Commonwealth of Nations must retire at 65, or even 62. In Australia, the Constitution was changed to ensure that federal judges do not serve beyond 70. By such standards, the ALJ is getting long in the tooth. Yet we all know people who are as sharp as a tack at 80 and much older. And as I get older I tell myself that it is all relative It falls to me to lead this celebration. And to reflect on the changing perspectives of the law and of its profession over the past 80 years. In the law, we participate in such jubilees partly for reasons of * Paper delivered to a conference to celebrate the 80th anniversary of the ALJ, Sydney, 16 March 2007. ** Acting Chief Justice of Australia. The author acknowledges the assistance of Mr Adam Sharpe, Legal Research Officer in the High Court Library, in collecting statistical and other materials used in this article. 2. nostalgia; partly to get our bearings for the present; and partly to grasp the gossamer-thin portents that suggest where we may be going. There is nothing quite like the ALJ in most other common law jurisdictions. England has the Law Quarterly Review and the Modern Law Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Pegislafibe $Eeembly
    Petitions-12 October, 1976 1641 pegislafibe $eeembly Tuesday, 12 October, 1976 P&"tions-Printing Committee (Sixth Report)-Questions without Notice-Joint Com- mittee upon Drugs-Local Government (Elections) Amendment Bill (Corn.)- Prim Regulation (Amendment) Bill (second reading)-General Loan Account Appropriation Bill (second reading)-Prices Regulation (Amendment) Bill (Com.) ---Allocation of Time for Discussion-Adjournment (Women Prisoners)- Question upon Notice. Mr Speaker (The Hon. Lawrence Borthwick Kelly) took the chair at 2.15 p.m. Mr Speaker offered the prayer. PETITIONS The Clerk announced that the following petitions had been lodged for presenta- tion and that copies would be referred to the appropriate Ministers: Sunday Hotel Trading The Petition of the undersigned Electors in the State of New South Wales respectfully sheweth: (1) A referendum on Sunday Trading in hotels was held in New South Wales in the year 1969 which showed an overwhelming majority voting against Sunday Trading in hotels. (2) It is considered by the undersigned that any changes in the law allowing extension of Sunday Trading in liquor in hotels or in any shop selling liquor will increase the acknowledged evils associated with the consumption of liquor including particularly danger in road travel and in crime, and in damage done to domestic life of wife husband and children in many cases. Your Petitioners therefore humbly pray that your Honourable House: (1) Will not pass any legislation which will allow any extension of Sunday Trading in liquor in hotels or in any other place where the sale of liquor is permitted. (2) If nevertheless it is intended to submit legislation to the House this should not be done until a further Referendum is held to ascertain the wishes of the people as was previously held and which as stated showed an overwhelming majority against such legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership in the Liberal Party: Bolte, Askin and the Post-War Ascendancy
    Leadership in the Liberal Party: Bolte, Askin and the Post-War Ascendancy Norman Abjorensen December 2004 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University Declaration I hereby declare that the work presented in this thesis is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, original, except as acknowledged in the text, and that the material has not been submitted in whole or in part, for a degree at this or any other university. Norman Abjorensen 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Tables…..5 Acknowledgements…..6 Abstract…..7 Introduction: Getting Dinkum…..8 (i) The Nature of State Politics…..9 (ii) The Post-War World …..13 (iii) The Liberal Party in State Politics…….14 (iv) Defining a Political Era…..21 (v) Parallel Lives?…..24 (vi) Structure, Sources and Methodology…..29 1. The Origins of Liberal Revival….35 1.1 Conflicting Narratives of the 1940s: Golden Age or Crisis…..36 1.2 Towards a Liberal Revival…..45 1.3 Failure of Leadership (1): Victoria: Revival Then Chaos…..51 1.4 Failure of Leadership (2): NSW: The Seeds of Liberal Despair…..64 1.5 ‘Dinkum’ Leadership and the Post-War Zeitgeist…..71 (a) A Sceptical Electorate…..71 (b) Leadership and the Liberal Party…..74 2. Leadership and the Post-War Ascendancy: The New Rhetoric of Prosperity …..91 2.1 The Background…..92 2.2 The Liberals’ King Tide…..100 2.3 Emancipation of the Catholic Vote…..116 2.4 Liberal Resurgence in the West…..122 2.5 South Australia and the Playford Era…..127 2.6 A Liberal Australia…130 3.
    [Show full text]