DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Notes Calculating the Human Development Indices—Graphical Presentation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Notes Calculating the Human Development Indices—Graphical Presentation HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2019 Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequalities in human development in the 21st century Technical notes Calculating the human development indices—graphical presentation Human Development DIMENSIONS Long and healthy life Knowledge A decent standard of living Index (HDI) INDICATORS Life expectancy at birth Expected years Mean years GNI per capita (PPP $) of schooling of schooling DIMENSION Life expectancy index Education index GNI index INDEX Human Development Index (HDI) Inequality-adjusted DIMENSIONS Long and healthy life Knowledge A decent standard of living Human Development Index (IHDI) INDICATORS Life expectancy at birth Expected years Mean years GNI per capita (PPP $) of schooling of schooling DIMENSION Life expectancy Years of schooling Income/consumption INDEX INEQUALITY- Inequality-adjusted Inequality-adjusted Inequality-adjusted ADJUSTED life expectancy index education index income index INDEX Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI) Gender Development Female Male Index (GDI) DIMENSIONS Long and Standard Long and Standard healthy life Knowledge of living healthy life Knowledge of living INDICATORS Life expectancy Expected Mean GNI per capita Life expectancy Expected Mean GNI per capita years of years of (PPP $) years of years of (PPP $) schooling schooling schooling schooling DIMENSION INDEX Life expectancy index Education index GNI index Life expectancy index Education index GNI index Human Development Index (female) Human Development Index (male) Gender Development Index (GDI) Gender Inequality DIMENSIONS Health Empowerment Labour market Index (GII) INDICATORS Maternal Adolescent Female and male population Female and male shares of Female and male mortality birth with at least parliamentary seats labour force ratio rate secondary education participation rates DIMENSION Female reproductive Female empowerment Female labour Male empowerment Male labour INDEX health index index market index index market index Female gender index Male gender index Gender Inequality Index (GII) Multidimensional DIMENSIONS Health Education Standard of living Poverty Index (MPI) INDICATORS Nutrition Child mortality Years Children Cooking fuel Toilet Water Electricity Floor Assets of schooling enrolled POVERTY Intensity Headcount MEASURES of poverty ratio Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) Technical notes | 1 Technical note 1. Human Development Index The Human Development Index (HDI) is a summary measure expectancy has already come very close to 85 years in several of achievements in three key dimensions of human develop- economies: 84.7 years in Hong Kong, China (Special Adminis- ment: a long and healthy life, access to knowledge and a decent trative Region) and 84.5 years in Japan. standard of living. The HDI is the geometric mean of normal- Societies can subsist without formal education, justifying the ized indices for each of the three dimensions. education minimum of 0 years. The maximum for expected years of schooling, 18, is equivalent to achieving a master’s degree in most countries. The maximum for mean years of Data sources schooling, 15, is the projected maximum of this indicator for 2025. • Life expectancy at birth: UNDESA (2019). The low minimum value for gross national income (GNI) • Expected years of schooling: UNESCO Institute for Statis- per capita, $100, is justified by the considerable amount of tics (2019), ICF Macro Demographic and Health Surveys, unmeasured subsistence and nonmarket production in econo- United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Multiple Indi- mies close to the minimum, which is not captured in the official cator Cluster Surveys and OECD (2018). data. The maximum is set at $75,000 per capita. Kahneman • Mean years of schooling: UNESCO Institute for Statistics and Deaton (2010) have shown that there is virtually no gain (2019), Barro and Lee (2018), ICF Macro Demographic and in human development and well-being from annual income per Health Surveys, UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Sur- capita above $75,000. Currently, only four countries (Brunei veys and OECD (2018). Darussalam, Liechtenstein, Qatar and Singapore) exceed the • GNI per capita: World Bank (2019), IMF (2019) and United $75,000 income per capita ceiling. Nations Statistics Division (2019). Having defined the minimum and maximum values, the dimension indices are calculated as: actual value – minimum value Steps to calculate the Human Development Index Dimension index = . (1) maximum value – minimum value There are two steps to calculating the HDI. For the education dimension, equation 1 is first applied to each of the two indicators, and then the arithmetic mean of the Step 1. Creating the dimension indices two resulting indices is taken. Using the arithmetic mean of two education indices allows perfect substitutability between Minimum and maximum values (goalposts) are set in order to mean years of schooling and expected years of schooling, which transform the indicators expressed in different units into indi- seems to be right given that many developing countries have low ces between 0 and 1. These goalposts act as the “natural zeros” school attainment among adults but are eager to achieve univer- and “aspirational targets,” respectively, from which component sal primary and secondary school enrolment among school-age indicators are standardized (see equation 1 below). They are set children. at the following values: Because each dimension index is a proxy for capabilities in the corresponding dimension, the transformation function from Dimension Indicator Minimum Maximum income to capabilities is likely to be concave (Anand and Sen Health Life expectancy (years) 20 85 Expected years of schooling (years) 0 18 2000)—that is, each additional dollar of income has a smaller Education Mean years of schooling (years) 0 15 effect on expanding capabilities. Thus for income, the natural Standard of living Gross national income per capita (2011 PPP $) 100 75,000 logarithm of the actual, minimum and maximum values is used. The justification for placing the natural zero for life expec- Step 2. Aggregating the dimensional indices to produce the tancy at 20 years is based on historical evidence that no country Human Development Index in the 20th century had a life expectancy of less than 20 years (Maddison, 2010; Oeppen and Vaupel, 2002; Riley, 2005). The HDI is the geometric mean of the three dimensional Maximum life expectancy is set at 85, a realistic aspirational indices: target for many countries over the last 30 years. Due to con- HDI = (I . I . I ) 1/3 stantly improving living conditions and medical advances, life Health Education Income 2 | HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2019 HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2019 Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequalities in human development in the 21st century Example: Bangladesh Official PPP conversion rates are produced by the Interna- Indicator Value tional Comparison Program, whose surveys periodically collect Life expectancy at birth (years) 72.3 thousands of prices of matched goods and services in many Expected years of schooling (years) 11.2 countries. The last round of this exercise refers to 2011 and Mean years of schooling (years) 6.1 covered 199 countries. Gross national income per capita (2011 PPP $) 4,057 Note: Values are rounded. 72.32 – 20 Estimating missing values Health index = = 0.8049 85 – 20 For a small number of countries missing one of the four indi- cators, the HDRO estimated the missing values using cross- Expected years of schooling index = 11.20449 – 0 = 0.62247 18 – 0 country regression models. In this Report expected years of schooling were estimated for Mean years of schooling index = 6.06183 – 0 = 0.40412 Bahamas, Dominica, Equatorial Guinea, Haiti, Libya, Papua 15 – 0 New Guinea, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, and Vanuatu. Mean years of schooling were estimated for Eritrea, Grenada and Saint 0.62247 + 0.40412 Education index = = 0.5133 Kitts and Nevis. 2 Income index = ln(4,057.25) – ln(100) = 0.5594 ln(75,000) – ln(100) Human development categories Human Development Index = (0.8049 . 0.5133 . 0.5594)1/3 = 0.614 The 2014 Human Development Report introduced fixed cutoff points for four categories of human development achievements. The cutoff pointsCOP ( ) are the HDI values calculated using the quartiles (q) from the distributions of the component indi- Methodology used to express income cators averaged over 2004–2013: COP = HDI (LE , EYS , MYS , GNIpc ), q = 1,2,3. The World Bank’s 2019 World Development Indicators data- q q q q q base contains estimates of GNI per capita in constant 2011 For example, LE1, LE2 and LE3 denote three quartiles of the purchasing power parity (PPP) terms for many countries. distribution of life expectancy across countries. For countries missing this indicator (entirely or partly), the This Report keeps the same cutoff points of the HDI for Human Development Report Office (HDRO) calculates it by grouping countries that were introduced in the 2014 Report: converting GNI per capita in local currency from current to Very high human development 0.800 and above constant terms using two steps. First, the value of GNI per High human development 0.700–0.799 capita in current terms is converted into PPP terms for the Medium human development 0.550–0.699 base year (2011). Second, a time series of GNI per capita in Low human development Below 0.550 constant 2011 PPP terms is constructed by applying the real growth rates to the GNI per capita in PPP terms for the base year. The real growth rate is implied
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unescap Working Paper Filling Gaps in the Human Development Index
    WP/09/02 UNESCAP WORKING PAPER FILLING GAPS IN THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX: FINDINGS FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC David A. Hastings Filling Gaps in the Human Development Index: Findings from Asia and the Pacific David A. Hastings Series Editor: Amarakoon Bandara Economic Affairs Officer Macroeconomic Policy and Development Division Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific United Nations Building, Rajadamnern Nok Avenue Bangkok 10200, Thailand Email: [email protected] WP/09/02 UNESCAP Working Paper Macroeconomic Policy and Development Division Filling Gaps in the Human Development Index: Findings for Asia and the Pacific Prepared by David A. Hastings∗ Authorized for distribution by Aynul Hasan February 2009 Abstract The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or carrying the endorsement of the United Nations. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate. This publication has been issued without formal editing. This paper reports on the geographic extension of the Human Development Index from 177 (a several-year plateau in the United Nations Development Programme's HDI) to over 230 economies, including all members and associate members of ESCAP. This increase in geographic coverage makes the HDI more useful for assessing the situations of all economies – including small economies traditionally omitted by UNDP's Human Development Reports. The components of the HDI are assessed to see which economies in the region display relatively strong performance, or may exhibit weaknesses, in those components.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard of Living in America Today
    STANDARD OF LIVING IN AMERICA TODAY Standard of Living is one of the three areas measured by the American Human Development Index, along with health and education. Standard of living is measured using median personal earnings, the wages and salaries of all workers 16 and over. While policymakers and the media closely track Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and judge America’s progress by it, the American Human Development Index tracks median personal earnings, a better gauge of ordinary Americans’ standard of living. The graph below chronicles two stories of American economic history over the past 35 years. One is the story of extraordinary economic growth as told by GDP; the other is a story of economic stagnation as told by earnings, which have barely budged since 1974 (both in constant dollars). GDP vs. Median Earnings: Change Since 1974 STRIKING FINDINGS IN STANDARD OF LIVING FROM THE MEASURE OF AMERICA 2010-2011: The Measure of America 2010-2011 explores the median personal earnings of various groups—by state, congressional district, metro area, racial/ethnic groups, and for men and women—and reveals alarming gaps that threaten the long-term well-being of our nation: American women today have higher overall levels of educational attainment than men. Yet men earn an average of $11,000 more. In no U.S. states do African Americans, Latinos, or Native Americans earn more than Asian Americans or whites. By the end of the 2007-9 recession, unemployment among the bottom tenth of U.S. households, those with incomes below $12,500, was 31 percent, a rate higher than unemployment in the worst year of the Great Depression; for households with incomes of $150,000 and over, unemployment was just over 3 percent, generally considered as full employment.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Poverty Prevalence in China: New Evidence from Four
    An Evaluation of Poverty Prevalence in China: New Evidence from Four Recent Surveys Chunni ZHANG, Qi XU, Xiang ZHOU, Xiaobo ZHANG, Yu XIE Abstract In this paper, we calculate and compare the poverty incidence rate in China using four nationally representative surveys: the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS, 2010), the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS, 2010), the Chinese Household Finance Survey (CHFS, 2011), and the Chinese Household Income Project (CHIP, 2007). Using both international and official domestic poverty standards, we show that poverty prevalence at the national, rural, and urban levels based on the CFPS, CGSS and CHFS are much higher than official estimation and those based on the CHIP. The study highlights the importance of using independent datasets to validate official statistics of public and policy concern in contemporary China. 1 An Evaluation of Poverty Prevalence in China: New Evidence from Four Recent Surveys Since the economic reform began in 1978, China’s economic growth has not only greatly improved the average standard of living in China but also been credited with lifting hundreds of millions of Chinese out of poverty. According to one report (Ravallion and Chen, 2007), the poverty rate dropped from 53% in 1981 to 8% in 2001. Because of the vast size of the Chinese population, even a seemingly low poverty rate of 8% implies that there were still more than 100 million Chinese people living in poverty, a sizable subpopulation exceeding the national population of the Philippines and falling slightly short of the total population of Mexico. Hence, China still faces an enormous task in eradicating poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Development Index: Measuring the Quality of Life
    Student Resource XIV The Human Development Index: Measuring the Quality of Life The ‘Human Development Index (HDI) is a summary measure of average achievement in key dimensions of human development’ (UNDP). It is a measure closely related to quality of life, and is used to compare two or more countries. The United Nations developed the HDI based on three main dimensions: long and healthy life, knowledge, and a decent standard of living (see Image below). Figure 1: Indicators of HDI Source: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi In 2015, the United States ranked 8th among all countries in Human Development, ranking behind countries like Norway, Australia, Switzerland, Denmark, Netherlands, Germany and Ireland (UNDP, 2015). The closer a country is to 1.0 on the HDI index, the better its standing in regards to human development. Maps of HDI ranking reveal regional patterns, such as the low HDI in Sub-Saharan Africa (Figure 2). Figure 2. The United Nations Human Development Index (HDI) rankings for 2014 17 Use Student Resource XIII, Measuring Quality of Life Country Statistics to answer the following questions: 1. Categorize the countries into three groups based on their GNI PPP (US$), which relates to their income. List them here. High Income: Medium Income: Low Income: 2. Is there a relationship between income and any of the other statistics listed in the table, such as access to electricity, undernourishment, or access to physicians (or others)? Describe at least two patterns here. 3. There are several factors we can look at to measure a country's quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Connenction Between Global Innovation Index and Economic Well-Being Indexes
    Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce – APSTRACT University of Debrecen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Debrecen SCIENTIFIC PAPER DOI: 10.19041/APSTRACT/2019/3-4/11 THE CONNENCTION BETWEEN GLOBAL INNOVATION INDEX AND ECONOMIC WELL-BEING INDEXES Szlobodan Vukoszavlyev University of Debrecen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Hungary [email protected] Abstract: We study the connection of innovation in 126 countries by different well-being indicators and whether there are differences among geographical regions with respect to innovation index score. We approach and define innovation based on Global Innovation Index (GII). The following well-being indicators were emphasized in the research: GDP per capita measured at purchasing power parity, unemployment rate, life expectancy, crude mortality rate, human development index (HDI). Innovation index score was downloaded from the joint publication of 2018 of Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO, HDI from the website of the UN while we obtained other well-being indicators from the database of the World Bank. Non-parametric hypothesis testing, post-hoc tests and linear regression were used in the study. We concluded that there are differences among regions/continents based on GII. It is scarcely surprising that North America is the best performer followed by Europe (with significant differences among countries). Central and South Asia scored the next places with high standard deviation. The following regions with significant backwardness include North Africa, West Asia, Latin America, the Caribbean Area, Central and South Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. Regions lagging behind have lower standard deviation, that is, they are more homogeneous therefore there are no significant differences among countries in the particular region.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience
    Human Development Report 2014 Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience Explanatory note on the 2014 Human Development Report composite indices Oman HDI values and rank changes in the 2014 Human Development Report Introduction The 2014 Human Development Report (HDR) presents the 2014 Human Development Index (HDI) (values and ranks) for 187 countries and UN-recognized territories, along with the Inequality-adjusted HDI for 145 countries, the Gender Development Index for 148 countries, the Gender Inequality Index for 149 countries, and the Multidimensional Poverty Index for 91 countries. Country rankings and values of the annual Human Development Index (HDI) are kept under strict embargo until the global launch and worldwide electronic release of the Human Development Report. It is misleading to compare values and rankings with those of previously published reports, because of revisions and updates of the underlying data and adjustments to goalposts. Readers are advised to assess progress in HDI values by referring to table 2 (‘Human Development Index Trends’) in the Statistical Annex of the report. Table 2 is based on consistent indicators, methodology and time-series data and thus shows real changes in values and ranks over time, reflecting the actual progress countries have made. Small changes in values should be interpreted with caution as they may not be statistically significant due to sampling variation. Generally speaking, changes at the level of the third decimal place in any of the composite indices
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Development Index (HDI)
    Contribution to Beyond Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Name of the indicator/method: The Human Development Index (HDI) Summary prepared by Amie Gaye: UNDP Human Development Report Office Date: August, 2011 Why an alternative measure to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) The limitation of GDP as a measure of a country’s economic performance and social progress has been a subject of considerable debate over the past two decades. Well-being is a multidimensional concept which cannot be measured by market production or GDP alone. The need to improve data and indicators to complement GDP is the focus of a number of international initiatives. The Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Commission1 identifies at least eight dimensions of well-being—material living standards (income, consumption and wealth), health, education, personal activities, political voice and governance, social connections and relationships, environment (sustainability) and security (economic and physical). This is consistent with the concept of human development, which focuses on opportunities and freedoms people have to choose the lives they value. While growth oriented policies may increase a nation’s total wealth, the translation into ‘functionings and freedoms’ is not automatic. Inequalities in the distribution of income and wealth, unemployment, and disparities in access to public goods and services such as health and education; are all important aspects of well-being assessment. What is the Human Development Index (HDI)? The HDI serves as a frame of reference for both social and economic development. It is a summary measure for monitoring long-term progress in a country’s average level of human development in three basic dimensions: a long and healthy life, access to knowledge and a decent standard of living.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina and the United Nations Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework
    Bosnia and Herzegovina and the United Nations 2021- Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework 2025 A Partnership for Sustainable Development Declaration of commitment The authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and the United Nations (UN) are committed to working together to achieve priorities in BiH. These are expressed by: ` The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and selected Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets1 as expressed in the emerging SDG Framework in BiH and domesticated SDG targets2; ` Future accession to the European Union, as expressed in the Action Plan for implementation of priorities from the European Commission Opinion and Analytical Report3; ` The Joint Socio-Economic Reforms (‘Reform Agenda’), 2019-20224; and ` The human rights commitments of BiH and other agreed international and regional development goals and treaty obligations5 and conventions. This Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework (CF), adopted by the BiH Council of Ministers at its 22nd Session on 16 December 2020 and reconfrmed by the BiH Presidency at its 114th Extraordinary Session on 5 March 2021, will guide the work of authorities in BiH and the UN system until 2025. This framework builds on the successes of our past cooperation and it represents a joint commitment to work in close partnership for results as defned in this Cooperation Framework that will help all people in BiH to live longer, healthier and more prosperous and secure lives. In signing hereafter, the cooperating partners endorse this Cooperation Framework and underscore their joint commitments toward the achievement of its results. Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina United Nations Country Team H.E. Dr. Zoran Tegeltija Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • EPAU HDI Comparative Assessment Technical Note December 2011 Docx
    Economic and Policy Analysis Unit UNDP Maputo December 2011 Mozambique’s Performance in the HDI . A comparative Assessment Author: Thomas Kring Technical Note Mozambique’s Performance in the HDI Published by The Economic and Policy Analysis Unit (EPAU) UNDP Mozambique Av. Kenneth Kaunda 931 Maputo, Mozambique Technical Notes from EPAU are intended to be informal notes on economic and technical issues relevant for the work of the UNDP in Mozambique. The views expressed are those of the author and may not be attributed to the UNDP. 1 Technical Note Mozambique’s Performance in the HDI Introduction Since 1990 the UNDP has published the Human Development Report (HDR) on an annual basis. One significant component of the HDR has traditionally been advanced statistics seeking to measure economic and human development in more comprehensive and informative ways. One of the best known measures in the HDR is the Human Development Index (HDI). The HDI provides a broad overview of human progress and the complex relationship between income and well-being. The HDI looks beyond the GDP to a broader definition of well-being by including health and knowledge. By doing so it corrects, to some extent, for the inherent weaknesses in traditional measurements of growth and wealth (see Annex 2 for more detail). The recently released Global HDR 2011 provides, as in previous years, a HDI value for a 187 countries in the world. Mozambique’s performance this year, as in previous years, continues to baffle observers. The country has made significant progress in the past ten years or more. It is among the five highest performers in the world measured in terms of average annual increase in the HDI since 2000 in relative terms, and among the top 25 in absolute terms (see Annex 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Foundations of Authoritarian Rule
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2017 The conomicE Foundations of Authoritarian Rule Clay Robert Fuller University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Fuller, C. R.(2017). The Economic Foundations of Authoritarian Rule. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4202 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF AUTHORITARIAN RULE by Clay Robert Fuller Bachelor of Arts West Virginia State University, 2008 Master of Arts Texas State University, 2010 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2014 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2017 Accepted by: John Hsieh, Major Professor Harvey Starr, Committee Member Timothy Peterson, Committee Member Gerald McDermott, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright Clay Robert Fuller, 2017 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION for Henry, Shannon, Mom & Dad iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks goes to God, the unconditional love and support of my wife, parents and extended family, my dissertation committee, Alex, the institutions of the United States of America, the State of South Carolina, the University of South Carolina, the Department of Political Science faculty and staff, the Walker Institute of International and Area Studies faculty and staff, the Center for Teaching Excellence, undergraduate political science majors at South Carolina who helped along the way, and the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Central African Republic
    Human Development Report 2014 Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience Explanatory note on the 2014 Human Development Report composite indices Central African Republic HDI values and rank changes in the 2014 Human Development Report Introduction The 2014 Human Development Report (HDR) presents the 2014 Human Development Index (HDI) (values and ranks) for 187 countries and UN-recognized territories, along with the Inequality-adjusted HDI for 145 countries, the Gender Development Index for 148 countries, the Gender Inequality Index for 149 countries, and the Multidimensional Poverty Index for 91 countries. Country rankings and values of the annual Human Development Index (HDI) are kept under strict embargo until the global launch and worldwide electronic release of the Human Development Report. It is misleading to compare values and rankings with those of previously published reports, because of revisions and updates of the underlying data and adjustments to goalposts. Readers are advised to assess progress in HDI values by referring to table 2 (‘Human Development Index Trends’) in the Statistical Annex of the report. Table 2 is based on consistent indicators, methodology and time-series data and thus shows real changes in values and ranks over time, reflecting the actual progress countries have made. Small changes in values should be interpreted with caution as they may not be statistically significant due to sampling variation. Generally speaking, changes at the level of the third decimal place in any of the composite indices are considered insignificant. Unless otherwise specified in the source, tables use data available to the HDRO as of 15 November 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnolinguistic Diversity and Education. a Successful Pairing
    sustainability Article Ethnolinguistic Diversity and Education. A Successful Pairing Mª Ángeles Caraballo 1,* and Eva Mª Buitrago 2 1 Dpto. Economía e Historia Económica and IUSEN, Universidad de Sevilla, 41018 Sevilla, Spain 2 Dpto. Economía Aplicada III and IAIIT, Universidad de Sevilla, 41018 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-954-557-535 Received: 22 October 2019; Accepted: 19 November 2019; Published: 23 November 2019 Abstract: The many growing migratory flows render our societies increasingly heterogeneous. From the point of view of social welfare, achieving all the positive effects of diversity appears as a challenge for our societies. Nevertheless, while it is true that ethnolinguistic diversity involves costs and benefits, at a country level it seems that the former are greater than the latter, even more so when income inequality between ethnic groups is taken into account. In this respect, there is a vast literature at a macro level that shows that ethnolinguistic fragmentation induces lower income, which leads to the conclusion that part of the difference in income observed between countries can be attributed to their different levels of fragmentation. This paper presents primary evidence of the role of education in mitigating the adverse effects of ethnolinguistic fractionalization on the level of income. While the results show a negative association between fragmentation and income for all indices of diversity, the attainment of a certain level of education, especially secondary and tertiary, manages to reverse the sign of the marginal effect of ethnolinguistic fractionalization on income level. Since current societies are increasingly diverse, these results could have major economic policy implications.
    [Show full text]