Economist Letter Against Raising the Minimum Wage

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Economist Letter Against Raising the Minimum Wage A Statement to Federal Policy Makers The “recovery” from the Great Recession has been anemic. Business growth, job creation, and consumer spending remain tenuous. Since the official trough in June 2009, median income has fallen, real wages have barely risen, unemployment remains elevated, and because so many Americans have left the workforce entirely, the fraction of the population working is below the pre-recession level. To address the very real concerns of out of work and low-wage workers, many of our nation’s policymakers point to raising the minimum wage as a “silver bullet” solution. Although increasing wages through legislative action may sound like a great idea, poverty is a serious, complex issue that demands a comprehensive and thoughtful solution that targets those Americans actually in need. As economists, we understand the fragile nature of this recovery and the dire financial realities of the nearly 50 million Americans living in poverty. To alleviate these burdens for families and improve our local, regional, and national economies, we need a mix of solutions that encourage employment, business creation, and boost earnings rather than across- the-board mandates that raise the cost of labor. One of the serious consequences of raising the minimum wage is that business owners saddled with a higher cost of labor will need to cut costs, or pass the increase to their consumers in order to make ends meet. Many of the businesses that pay their workers minimum wage operate on extremely tight profit margins, with any increase in the cost of labor threatening this delicate balance. The Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) most recent report underscores the damage that a federal minimum wage increase would have. According to CBO, raising the federal minimum wage to $10.10 per hour would cost the economy 500,000 jobs by 2016. Many of these jobs are held by entry-level workers with limited experience or vocational skills, the very employees meant to be helped. The minimum wage is also a poorly targeted anti-poverty measure. Extra earnings generated by such an increase in the minimum wage would not substantially help the poor. As CBO noted, “many low-wage workers are not members of low-income families.” In fact, CBO estimates that less than 20 percent of the workers who would see a wage increase to $10.10 actually live in households that earn less than the federal poverty line. For these reasons, we encourage federal policymakers to examine creative, comprehensive policy solutions that truly help address poverty, boost incomes from work, and increase upward mobility by fostering growth in our nation’s economy. Sincerely, Vernon Smith Edward Prescott Eugene Fama Robert Lucas Daniel Benjamin Seth Bied Nobel laureate Nobel laureate Nobel laureate Nobel laureate Clemson University New York State Department of Taxation Burton Abrams Donald Alexander Dick Armey John Barrett Michael Bennett and Finance University of Delaware Western Michigan Retired Majority Leader, University of North Curry College University U.S. House of Alabama Andrew Biggs Eric Abrams Representatives William Beranek American Enterprise McKendree University William Allen Lowell Bassett University of Georgia Institute UCLA Nathan Ashby University of Washington Richard Adams University of Texas El Roger Betancourt Bob Bise Oregon State University John Anderson Paso Robert Battalio University of Maryland, Orange Coast College University of Nebraska- University of Notre Dame College Park Doug Adie Lincoln Ban Banerjee Bob Blewett Ohio University University of Wisconsin- Stacie Beck Sanjai Bhagat St. Lawrence University Wayne Angell Platteville University of Delaware University of Colorado Francis, Ahking Former Member of the Cecil Bohanon University of Connecticut Board of Governors Chris Barnekov Robert Beekman Miles Bidwell Ball State University Federal Communications University of Tampa Bidwell Associates William Albrecht JJ Arias Commission, Retired Michael Bond University of Iowa Georgia College Donald Bellante University of Arizona University of South Florida Donald Booth Patrick Button Warren Coats Harold Demsetz John Estill John Garen Chapman University University of California- International Monetary UCLA San Jose State University University of Kentucky Irvine Fund, Retired Geoffrey Booth Joseph DeSalvo Ayse Evrensel Stanley Garthoff Michigan State University Per Bylund Peter Colwell University of South Southern Illinois University of Akron Baylor University University of Illinois Florida-Tampa University Edwardsville Donald Boudreaux Urbana-Champaign Ramya Ghosh George Washington Charles Calomiris William Dewald Hugo Eyzaguirre Drexel University University Columbia University Roger Congleton The Ohio State University Northern Michigan West Virginia University University Joseph Giacalone John Boyd Colin Campbell Bob DeYoung St. John's University Florida International Dartmouth College Robert Connolly University of Kansas Frank Falero University University of North CSU Adam Gifford Victor Canto Carolina Arthur Diamond Cal State Northridge John Boyd La Jolla Economics University of Nebraska at Liliana Fargo University of Minnesota Kathleen Cooper Omaha University of Chicago Ann Gillette Robert Carey Former Undersecretary, Alumna Kennesaw State Genevieve Briand Clemson University Department of Commerce John Diamond University Washington State Rice University Ken Farr University Richard Cebula Mike Cosgrove Georgia College and David Gillette Jacksonville University University of Dallas David Dittman State University Truman State University Alex Brill Cornell University American Enterprise Don Chance Tyler Cowen Joan Farre-Mensa Vance Ginn Institute Louisiana State University George Mason University Jeffrey Dorfman Harvard University Texas Public Policy University of Georgia Foundation James Brown Beryl Chang Steven Craig Susan Feigenbaum Retired Columbia University University of Houston LuAnn Duffus University of Missouri-St. Peter Gioia College of Wooster Louis Connecticut Business and Don Bruce Myong-Hun Chang Mark Crain Industry Association University of Tennessee Cleveland State Lafayette College Joseph Duncan Randall Filer University Chairman, Micro Mite Hunter College & the Fred Goddard Eric Brucker Nicole Crain Information Research CUNY Graduate Center University of Florida University of Delaware Barry Chiswick Lafayette College George Washington Jerry Dwyer Silverio Zebral Filho Charles Goetz Lawrence Brunner University David Cushman Clemson University Organization of American University of Virginia Central Michigan Westminster College States University Susan Christoffersen Richard Eastin John Goodman Philadelphia University Larry Dann University of Southern Garry Fleming National Center for M. Northrup Buechner University of Oregon California Roanoke College Policy Analysis St. John’s University Michael Clark Hillsdale College Minh Dao John Eckalbar R.N. Folsom Ed Graham Richard Burkhauser Eastern Illinois University Cal State University San Jose State University UNC Wilmington Cornell University Ken Clarkson Chico University of Miami J. Ronnie Davis Douglas Frechtling Phil Gramm James Butkiewicz University of New John Egger George Washington University of Delaware Richard Claycombe Orleans Towson University University Anthony Greco McDaniel College University of Louisiana- Bill Butos Steven Davis Kenneth Elzinga Diana Furchtgott-Roth Lafayette Trinity College David Cleeton University of Chicago University of Virginia Manhattan Institute for Illinois State University Policy Research William Green Juan Buttari Louis De Alessi Richard Ericson Sam Houston State USAID Marcelo Clerici-Arias University of Miami East Carolina University Delworth Gardner University Stanford University Brigham Young University Thomas Gresik John Haslem Rod Hewlett Jerry Johnson Daniel Klein Randy LaHote University of Notre Dame University of Maryland Bellevue University University of South George Mason University Washtenaw Community Dakota College Earl Grinols Rudolf Hauser P.J. Hill Donald Koch Baylor University Retired Wheaton College Shane Johnson Former Chief Economist, Deepak Lal Texas A&M University Barnett Banks of Florida UCLA Darrin Gulla Gary Hawkins Vivian Ho University of Kentucky Indiana University South Rice University Steven Jones James Koch Heather Lamoreux Bend Indiana University Old Dominion University University of Ottawa Tami Gurley-Calvez John Hoehn University of Kansas Joel Hay Michigan State University Jerry Jordan Meir Kohn William Landes Medical Center University of Southern Federal Reserve Bank of Dartmouth College University of Chicago California Arlene Holen Cleveland Rik Hafer Former Associate Aycan Koksal George Langelett Southern Illinois Thomas Hazlett Director, Congressional Richard Just Cleveland State South Dakota State University Edwardsville Clemson University Budget Office University of Maryland University University Colleen Haight Daniel Heath Douglas Holtz-Eakin Michael Kaganovich Roger Koppl Richard Langlois San Jose State University Georgetown University American Action Forum Indiana University Syracuse University University of Connecticut Institute of International Simon Hakim Economic Law John Howell Kathleen Kahle Marvin Kosters Nicholas Lash Temple University Retired University of Arizona American Enterprise Loyola University of Gilbert Heebner Institute Chicago Dan Hamilton Eastern University, St. Jason Hsu Joseph Kalt California Lutheran Davids UCLA Harvard University Robert Krol William Lastrapes University Cal State Northridge
Recommended publications
  • Is the United States an Outlier in Public Mass Shootings? a Comment on Adam Lankford
    Discuss this article at Journaltalk: https://journaltalk.net/articles/5980/ ECON JOURNAL WATCH 16(1) March 2019: 37–68 Is the United States an Outlier in Public Mass Shootings? A Comment on Adam Lankford John R. Lott, Jr.1 and Carlisle E. Moody2 LINK TO ABSTRACT In 2016, Adam Lankford published an article in Violence and Victims titled “Public Mass Shooters and Firearms: A Cross-National Study of 171 Countries.” In the article he concludes: “Despite having less than 5% of the global population (World Factbook, 2014), it [the United States] had 31% of global public mass shooters” (Lankford 2016, 195). Lankford claims to show that over the 47 years from 1966 to 2012, both in the United States and around the world there were 292 cases of “public mass shooters” of which 90, or 31 percent, were American. Lankford attributes America’s outsized percentage of international public mass shooters to widespread gun ownership. Besides doing so in the article, he has done so in public discourse (e.g., Lankford 2017). Lankford’s findings struck a chord with President Obama: “I say this every time we’ve got one of these mass shootings: This just doesn’t happen in other countries.” —President Obama, news conference at COP21 climate conference in Paris, Dec. 1, 2015 (link) 1. Crime Prevention Research Center, Alexandria, VA 22302. 2. College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187; Crime Prevention Research Center, Alexan- dria, VA 22302. We would like to thank Lloyd Cohen, James Alan Fox, Tim Groseclose, Robert Hansen, Gary Kleck, Tom Kovandzic, Joyce Lee Malcolm, Craig Newmark, Scott Masten, Paul Rubin, and Mike Weisser for providing helpful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current and Future State of Gun Policy in the United States, 104 J
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 104 Article 5 Issue 4 Symposium On Guns In America Fall 2015 The urC rent And Future State Of Gun Policy In The nitU ed States William J. Vizzard Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation William J. Vizzard, The Current And Future State Of Gun Policy In The United States, 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 879 (2015). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol104/iss4/5 This Criminology is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/15/10404-0879 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 104, No. 4 Copyright © 2015 by Northwestern University School of Law Printed in U.S.A. THE CURRENT AND FUTURE STATE OF GUN POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES WILLIAM J. VIZZARD* In spite of years of journalistic and public attention and debate, the United States has instituted few changes in firearms policy over the past century. Opposition diluted a brief push by the Roosevelt administration in the 1930s and resulted in two minimalist federal statutes. A second effort in the wake of the assassinations of John and Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King produced the Gun Control Act of 1968, which largely remains the primary federal law. Even this modest control effort was subsequently diluted by the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Skilled-Immigration-In-A-Global-Labor-Market.Pdf
    cover 11/19/10 1:37 PM Page 1 frontmatter 11/19/10 12:27 PM Page i High-Skilled Immigration in a Global Labor Market frontmatter 11/19/10 12:27 PM Page iii High-Skilled Immigration in a Global Labor Market Barry R. Chiswick, Editor The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. frontmatter 11/19/10 12:27 PM Page iv Distributed by arrangement with the Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706. To order, call toll free 1-800-462-6420 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries, please contact AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, or call 1-800-862-5801. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data High-skilled immigration in a global labor market / Barry R. Chiswick, editor. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8447-4385-1 (cloth) ISBN-10: 0-8447-4385-2 (cloth) ISBN-13: 978-0-8447-4387-5 (ebook) ISBN-10: 0-8447-4387-9 (ebook) 1. Foreign workers. 2. Skilled labor. 3. Professional employees. 4. Labor market. 5. Emigration and immigration—Economic aspects. I. Chiswick, Barry R. HD6300.H54 2010 331.6'2—dc22 © 2011 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Wash- ington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or repro- duced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Allied Social Science Associations Atlanta, GA January 3–5, 2010
    Allied Social Science Associations Atlanta, GA January 3–5, 2010 Contract negotiations, management and meeting arrangements for ASSA meetings are conducted by the American Economic Association. i ASSA_Program.indb 1 11/17/09 7:45 AM Thanks to the 2010 American Economic Association Program Committee Members Robert Hall, Chair Pol Antras Ravi Bansal Christian Broda Charles Calomiris David Card Raj Chetty Jonathan Eaton Jonathan Gruber Eric Hanushek Samuel Kortum Marc Melitz Dale Mortensen Aviv Nevo Valerie Ramey Dani Rodrik David Scharfstein Suzanne Scotchmer Fiona Scott-Morton Christopher Udry Kenneth West Cover Art is by Tracey Ashenfelter, daughter of Orley Ashenfelter, Princeton University, former editor of the American Economic Review and President-elect of the AEA for 2010. ii ASSA_Program.indb 2 11/17/09 7:45 AM Contents General Information . .iv Hotels and Meeting Rooms ......................... ix Listing of Advertisers and Exhibitors ................xxiv Allied Social Science Associations ................. xxvi Summary of Sessions by Organization .............. xxix Daily Program of Events ............................ 1 Program of Sessions Saturday, January 2 ......................... 25 Sunday, January 3 .......................... 26 Monday, January 4 . 122 Tuesday, January 5 . 227 Subject Area Index . 293 Index of Participants . 296 iii ASSA_Program.indb 3 11/17/09 7:45 AM General Information PROGRAM SCHEDULES A listing of sessions where papers will be presented and another covering activities such as business meetings and receptions are provided in this program. Admittance is limited to those wearing badges. Each listing is arranged chronologically by date and time of the activity; the hotel and room location for each session and function are indicated. CONVENTION FACILITIES Eighteen hotels are being used for all housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Gary Becker's Early Work on Human Capital: Collaborations and Distinctiveness
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Teixeira, Pedro Article Gary Becker's early work on human capital: Collaborations and distinctiveness IZA Journal of Labor Economics Provided in Cooperation with: IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Suggested Citation: Teixeira, Pedro (2014) : Gary Becker's early work on human capital: Collaborations and distinctiveness, IZA Journal of Labor Economics, ISSN 2193-8997, Springer, Heidelberg, Vol. 3, pp. 1-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40172-014-0012-2 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/152338 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence
    [Show full text]
  • Do Casinos Really Cause Crime? Douglas M
    Econ Journal Watch Scholarly Comments on Academic Economics Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2008 Editor’s Notes 1-3 COMMENTS Do Casinos Really Cause Crime? Douglas M. Walker 4-20 Correctly Critiquing Casino-Crime Causality, Earl L. Grinols and David B. Mustard 21-31 Highway Penetration of Central Cities: Not a Major Cause of Suburbanization, Wendell Cox, Peter Gordon, and Christian L. Redfearn 32-45 Reply to Cox, Gordon, and Redfearn’s Comment on “Did Highways Cause Suburbanization?” Nathaniel Baum-Snow 46-50 Growth Accelerations and Regime Changes: A Correction, Richard Jong-A-Pin and Jakob de Haan 51-58 The EITC Disincentive: A Reply to Dr. Hilary Hoynes, Paul Trampe 59-65 Gulphs in Mankind’s Career of Prosperity: A Critique of Adam Smith on Interest Rate Restrictions, Jeremy Bentham 66-77 EC ONOMI C S IN PRA C TI C E The Market for Lemmas: Evidence that Complex Models Rarely Operate in Our World, Philip R.P. Coelho and James E. McClure 78-90 “Theory” and “Models”: Terminology through the Looking Glass, Robert S. Goldfarb and Jonathan Ratner 91-108 CHARA C TER ISSUES Left Out: A Critique of Paul Krugman Based on a Comprehensive Account of His New York Times Columns, 1997 through 2006, Daniel B. Klein with Harika Anna Barlett 109-133 Appendix: Taking Stock of Paul Krugman’s 654 New York Times Columns, 1997 through 2006, Harika Anna Barlett and Daniel B. Klein I-XLV THE SOUNDS OF SILEN C E 134 Entire January 2008 Issue (1.6MB) 1-134 EDITOR ’S NOT E Econ Journal Watch, Volume 5, Number 1, January 2008, pp 1-3.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Emperical Evidence on the Civil Justice System Produce Or Resolve Conflict?
    DePaul Law Review Volume 65 Issue 2 Winter 2016 Twenty-First Annual Clifford Symposium on Tort Law and Social Article 13 Policy Does Emperical Evidence on the Civil Justice System Produce or Resolve Conflict? Jeffrey J. Rachlinksi Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey J. Rachlinksi, Does Emperical Evidence on the Civil Justice System Produce or Resolve Conflict?, 65 DePaul L. Rev. (2016) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol65/iss2/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\jciprod01\productn\D\DPL\65-2\DPL205.txt unknown Seq: 1 2-AUG-16 9:51 DOES EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON THE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM PRODUCE OR RESOLVE CONFLICT? Jeffrey J. Rachlinski* INTRODUCTION Is the current United States Supreme Court an excessively pro-busi- ness court? The case that it is can and has been made.1 Businesses complained about punitive damage awards and the Court created con- stitutional judicial review of jury awards.2 Businesses complained about pleading rules that make it easy for consumers to bring lawsuits against business practices and the Court created heightened pleading standards.3 Businesses complained about class actions and jury trials and the Court embraced arbitration clauses, even to the point of pre- empting state law.4 Business interests, indeed, seem to be on a roll in front of the Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining Gun Control in America: Understanding the Remainder Problem Article and Essay Nicholas J
    Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Faculty Scholarship 2008 Imagining Gun Control in America: Understanding the Remainder Problem Article and Essay Nicholas J. Johnson Fordham University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, and the Second Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Nicholas J. Johnson, Imagining Gun Control in America: Understanding the Remainder Problem Article and Essay, 43 Wake Forest L. Rev. 837 (2008) Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/439 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IMAGINING GUN CONTROL IN AMERICA: UNDERSTANDING THE REMAINDER PROBLEM Nicholas J. Johnson* INTRODUCTION Gun control in the United States generally has meant some type of supply regulation. Some rules are uncontroversial like user- targeted restrictions that define the untrustworthy and prohibit them from accessing the legitimate supply.' Some have been very controversial like the District of Columbia's recently overturned law prohibiting essentially the entire population from possessing firearms.! Other contentious restrictions have focused on particular types of guns-e.g., the now expired Federal Assault Weapons Ban.' Some laws, like one-gun-a-month,4 target straw purchases but also constrict overall supply. Various other supply restrictions operate at the state and local level.
    [Show full text]
  • Myths About Defensive Gun Use and Permissive Gun Carry Laws
    MEDIA BERKELEY STUDIES GROUP Myths about Defensive Gun Use and Permissive Gun Carry Laws Daniel Webster, ScD, MPH Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD Jens Ludwig, PhD Georgetown University, Washington, DC © 2000 Prepared for the "Strengthening the Public Health Debate on Handguns, Crime, and Safety" meeting, Berkeley Media October 14 & 15, 1999, Chicago, IL, with support from the Joyce Foundation Studies Group 2140 Shattuck Ave. Suite 804 Berkeley, CA 94704 510.204.9700 fax 510.204.9710 [email protected] 2 Myths about Defensive Gun Use and Permissive Gun Carry Laws Myths about Defensive Gun Use and Permissive Gun Carry Laws In 1998, economist John Lott, Jr. published a book with the provocative title More Guns, Less Crime1 in which he presents and interprets data to support his thesis that communities are safer when its residents are free of government restrictions on gun ownership and carrying. The book focuses primarily on two of his studies. The first, conducted with David Mustard, estimates the effects on crime attributable to state laws that allow virtually all eligible gun buyers to obtain a permit to carry a gun in public.2 The second, conducted with William Landes, examines the effects of permissive gun carrying laws on mass shootings.3 In each case, the authors conclude that permissive gun carrying laws result in substantial reductions in violent crime. Another study that examines the benefits of gun ownership and carrying was conducted by Florida State University criminologists Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz,4 and was designed to estimate the frequency with which would-be-victims of crime in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Over 350 Experts Call for Entitlement Reform Now
    Insight Over 350 Experts Call for Entitlement Reform Now APRIL 2, 2011 Download the letter April 4, 2011 The Honorable John Boehner The Honorable Harry Reid Speaker of the House Senate Majority Leader Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Mitch McConnell House Minority Leader Senate Minority Leader Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Speaker Boehner, Minority Leader Pelosi, Majority Leader Reid, and Minority Leader McConnell: The President’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform concluded that we are at a national “moment of truth,” saying: “We cannot play games or put off hard choices any longer. Without regard to party, we have a patriotic duty to keep the promise of America to give our children and grandchildren a better life.” AMERICANACTIONFORUM.ORG To this end, the undersigned implore the Congress to include fundamental entitlement reform in its Budget Resolution for Fiscal Year 2012. There can be no greater national priority than reducing the prospective explosion of federal debt. It threatens the economic prosperity of this great country and represents a betrayal of our national obligation to deliver a better future to the next generations. Military leaders have identified future federal red ink as a national security threat. The unabated sea of federal spending lies at the intersection of these budgetary, economic, and national security threats. Reforming entitlements must be at the top of the agenda for the 112th Congress. Such an act of Congressional leadership will promote job growth, support more rapid economic growth, and rekindle the American dream of upward mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • What Type of Gun Control Will Actually Make Us Safer? John R. Lott, Jr
    What type of gun control will actually make us safer? John R. Lott, Jr. President Crime Prevention Research Center Before the Pennsylvania State Senate Judiciary Committee September 24, 2019 It is important that something be done about mass public shootings, but much of the current public discussion isn’t very serious. Proposals are constantly being put forward that would do nothing to stop these attacks, and those that would make a difference, despite wide agreement by academics, are ignored. The focus on mental illness is understandable, but psychiatrists and phycologists have a very poor record in identifying people who are likely to engage in these types of attacks. As to Red Flag Laws/Extreme Risk Protection Orders, people ignore that we already have Baker Act laws that deal explicitly with mental illness. It is also a mistake to focus on guns when there are so many other ways for people to commit suicide. Universal background checks, meaning background checks on the private transfer of guns, have been mentioned for years by gun control advocates. It was by far the most frequently mentioned proposal by former President Obama.1 But there has not been a single mass public shooting this century that such a law would have stopped.2 These laws also have real costs. In Washington, DC, for example, it costs $125 to do a background check on a privately transferred gun. That may stop the people who are most likely to be victims of violent crimes, often poor blacks who live in high crime urban areas, from being able to legally obtain guns for self- defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Guns, Crime, and Punishment in America
    Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 2001 Guns, Crime, and Punishment in America Bernard Harcourt Columbia Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Bernard Harcourt, Guns, Crime, and Punishment in America, 43 ARIZ. L. REV. 261 (2001). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/648 This Introduction is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTRODUCTION: GUNs, CRIME, AND PUNISHMENT IN AMERICA Bernard E. Harcourt* There are over 200 million firearms in private hands in the United States, more than a third of which are handguns. In 1993 alone, it is estimated that 1.3 million victims of serious violent crime faced an offender with a gun. In 1999, there were approximately 563,000 such victims. Estimates of defensive uses of firearms-situations where individuals used a gun to protect themselves, someone else, or their property-range from 65,000 to 2.5 million per year. Punishments for crimes committed with a firearm are severe: under the federal firearms enhancement statute, the mandatory minimum sentence for use of a firearm in a predicate crime ranges from five years to life imprisonment. In state courts in the mid-1990s, the average maximum length of prison sentences for weapons offenses was almost four years.
    [Show full text]