DOCSLIB.ORG

The Solubility of Gases in Liquids

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE SOLUBILITY OF GASES IN LIQUIDS RUBIN BATTINO' Department of Chewistry, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616 AXD H. LAWRENCE CLEVER Department of Chemistry, Etnory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30392 Received October 2.5, 1965 CONTENTS I. Introduction ..........................................................395 11. Nomencl ...... .. ............ ....... ....... 396 111. Methods ratus. ........ ... ............................. 397 A. Manome&-Volumetric Methods. ....................................397 1. The Solubility of Oxygen in Rater as a Comparison Standard.. .............. 397 2. Degassing the Solvent ................................................ 398 3. The Effect of Temperature on Solubility Measurements .................. 399 4. The Apparatus of Cook and Hanson. ................ .............. 399 5. Saturation Metho ...... .............. 400 13. Mass Spectrometric b .......... ................. 402 ............................ 403 .......................... 404 ........... ....................... 406 ..........................406 ................ ...... 407 ................ ........ 407 ... ............. ....... 407 ............................... 407 s. .................. ...... 407 .............................408 ............................. 408 1. Regular Solution Theory ..................... ....... 408 2. Cell Potential and Cavity Models.. .. .................... 410 3. Ot,her Contributions to Theory. .... ........................ 411 4. Special Studies. .................... ..................... 411 B. Temperahre Coefficient of Gas Solubility. ...............................412 C. Partial Molal Volumes of Gases Dissolved in Liquids .............. 413 D. GM ,Solubilities in Mixed Nonelectrolyte Solvents. ........ .... ...... 413 E. Solvent Surface Tension and Gas Solubility ............. ....... 415 F. SaltEffects ............................................... .... 416 G. Solubility of Gases in Biological Fluids. .... ..................... 419 H. Effect, of Pressure on Gas Solubility. ......... .................... 421 I. Solubility of Gases in Molten Salts and Glasses. ...... .... ........ 424 J. The Solubility of Gases in Molten Metals and Alloys.. .......... ..... 426 VI. Solribilit,y Data. ........................................... ........ 453 VII. References.. .............. ..................... ..... 453 I. IKTRODUCTION the solubility of gases in hunian tissues to the solubility The solubility of gases in liquids has been under of gases in molten salts and metals. quantitative investigation since the beginning of the This review brings up to date the earlier comprehen- nineteenth century. The last decade has seen some sive review of Pllarkham and Kobe (393). An annotated remarkable advances in theory, empirical correlations, bibliography (1907-1941) on the solubility of Ar, COZ, systems studied, and apparatus. Much of the earlier He, and Nz in organic liquids was prepared by Croxton work was more qualitative than quantitative. Gas (115). The two books by Hildebrand and Scott solubilities have become increasingly more important (243, 244) contain chapters on gas solubility and many for both the theoretical understanding of the liquid references. There are other papers containing either state and solutions, and for practical applications from general correlations or many references (170, 206, 247, 248, 282, 353, 373, 485, 670). The review by Him- (1) Department of Chemistry. Wright State College. Dayton, Ohio 4j431. melblau (249) on the diffusion of dissolved gases in 395 396 RUBINBATTINO AND H. LAWRENCECLEVER liquids is of interest, and the review by Rowlinson and K Henry's law constant or Setschenow equation param- Richardson (509) on the solubility of solids in com- eter Henry's law constant (to fit Eq 5) pressed gases may interest some readers. The limited Ki KP Henry's law constant (to fit Eq 6) literature on the solubility of liquids in compressed KO Henry's law constant (to fit Eq 7) gases has yet to be reviewed. K' Henry's law constant, modified The literature since Varkham and Kobe was searched K, Henry's law constant, reduced and critically evaluated. The principal medium of the K", K." limiting Henry's law constants in water and in salt solution search was Chemical Abstracts through Vol. 59, or the L Ostwald coefficient (see section IVB) end of 1963. All pertinent articles abstracted through M molecular weight the end of 1963 were included, although many articles P pressure which were published in 1964 and 1965 were also included. P., Po solvent vapor pressure Where the original paper was not examined, a Chemical PT total pressure Pi partial pressure or vapor pressure Abstracts reference is supplied in the list of references. S Kuenen coefficient (see section IVA) The emphasis in this review was placed on physical Si", Si solubility of gas in pure solvent, or sdt solution methods of determining solubilities and on reporting 32 partial molar entropy of gas in solution and discussing only equilibrium or saturation solubili- S: molar entropy of gas in gas phase ties. Thus, the vast literature on the analysis of gases AS" molar entropy of solution T temperature, "K absorbed in liquids was ignored. Since most of these To critical temperature analyses involve Chemical methods, the latter was Ti reduced temperature also ignored except for oxygen in water. The extensive v, V volume, molar volume literature on the solubility of gases in ponds, streams, VS volume of solvent and ground waters was not included because of the volume of gas equilibrium criterion. molar volume of gas in cc/mole at 0' partial molar volume at infinite dilution of gas There is an almost nonexistent dividing line between partial molar volume at infinite dilution of electro- gas solubility (in liquids) and vapor-liquid equilibrium, lyte especially at elevated pressures. The solubility of the XP, XI mole fraction solubility of gas in solution vapors of some substances was included where the XPi ideal mole fraction solubility of gas in solution experimental conditions were such that the pressure Y vapor phase mole fraction was lower than the normal vapor pressure. Also in- Lower Case Symbols cluded are: (a) solubilities of gases in molten metals, arbitrary constants salt concentration, moles per liter alloys, salts, and glasses; (b) solubilities of gas mix- gas concentration, moles per liter tures; (c) solubility in tissues and some biological activity coefficient of dissolved gas in salt-free solu- systems; (d) solubility nomographs; and (e) partial tion molal volumes of gases in liquids. activity coefficient of dissolved gas in salt solution The large body of literature on the solubility of gases gravitational constant in plastic materials was excluded since much of this excess Gibbs free energy Boltzmann constant data is for plastic films. The solubility of gases in solids salting-out parameter and substances whose composition would tend to be salting-out parameter for salt x indeterminable (like molten slags) was also excluded. nonelectrolyte self-interaction parameter salt-effect parameter 11. NOMENCLATURE molality The system of notation used in this review follows. pressure Some specialized symbols which apply to a particular radius of spherical gas atom temperature, "C approach, and where we wished use the author's to decimal fraction of solute in solution own notation for clarity, are defined where they are volume used. Greek Letter Symbols Upper Case Symbols Bunsen coefficient (see section IVA) A arbitrary constant interaction parameters C1, Cd concentration of gas dissolved in the liquid phase absorption coefficient (see section IVB) c, concentration of gas dissolved in the gas phase compressibility of pure solvent CW weight solubility (see section IVD) activity coefficient heat capacity change on solution AC, Hildebrand solubility parameter AEV molar energy of vaporization Q molar Gibbs free energy LennardJones force constant Hz Henry's law constant (see section VD) volume fraction or vapor phase activity coefficient AH, AB" molar heat of solution density AHy molar heat, of vaporization surface tension SOLUBILITYOF GASESIN LIQUIDS 397 111. METHODSAND APPARATUS the physical properties of pressure, volume, and tem- The variety of approaches which have been used to perature are usually adequately determined. The determine the solubility of gases in liquids is an ade- discrepancies, often large, between published values quate testimonial to man’s ingenuity. The equipment which appear in the literature (for example, the solu- used ranges in complexity and cost from mass spec- bility of atmospheric gases in water and sea water con- trometers to the simple van Slyke apparatus, in time tinues to be measured and debated) are most probably from minutes to many hours, and in precision from the due to other factors. Cook and Hanson (104) list purely qualitative to the highly precise. these as being one or more of the folIowing: (a) failure Primarily physical methods will be discussed in to attain equilibrium; (b) failure to completely degas this section, although, in specific instances chemical the solvent; (c) failure to ascertain the true amount of methods are sometimes more precise. There are several gas dissolved; and (d) failure to make certain that the reasons for omitting chemical methods (except for transfer of gas from a primary container to the ap- oxygen in water). First, they are normally specific for paratus does not involve contamination. The last two a particular gas and thus do not
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Quality: in Situ Air Sparging

    Environmental Quality: in Situ Air Sparging

    EM 200-1-19 31 December 2013 Environmental Quality IN-SITU AIR SPARGING ENGINEER MANUAL AVAILABILITY Electronic copies of this and other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) publications are available on the Internet at http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/ This site is the only repository for all official USACE regulations, circulars, manuals, and other documents originating from HQUSACE. Publications are provided in portable document format (PDF). This document is intended solely as guidance. The statutory provisions and promulgated regulations described in this document contain legally binding requirements. This document is not a legally enforceable regulation itself, nor does it alter or substitute for those legal provisions and regulations it describes. Thus, it does not impose any legally binding requirements. This guidance does not confer legal rights or impose legal obligations upon any member of the public. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the discussion in this document, the obligations of the regulated community are determined by statutes, regulations, or other legally binding requirements. In the event of a conflict between the discussion in this document and any applicable statute or regulation, this document would not be controlling. This document may not apply to a particular situation based upon site- specific circumstances. USACE retains the discretion to adopt approaches on a case-by-case basis that differ from those described in this guidance where appropriate and legally consistent. This document may be revised periodically without public notice. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EM 200-1-19 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CEMP-CE Washington, D.C.
  • THE SOLUBILITY of GASES in LIQUIDS Introductory Information C

    THE SOLUBILITY of GASES in LIQUIDS Introductory Information C

    THE SOLUBILITY OF GASES IN LIQUIDS Introductory Information C. L. Young, R. Battino, and H. L. Clever INTRODUCTION The Solubility Data Project aims to make a comprehensive search of the literature for data on the solubility of gases, liquids and solids in liquids. Data of suitable accuracy are compiled into data sheets set out in a uniform format. The data for each system are evaluated and where data of sufficient accuracy are available values are recommended and in some cases a smoothing equation is given to represent the variation of solubility with pressure and/or temperature. A text giving an evaluation and recommended values and the compiled data sheets are published on consecutive pages. The following paper by E. Wilhelm gives a rigorous thermodynamic treatment on the solubility of gases in liquids. DEFINITION OF GAS SOLUBILITY The distinction between vapor-liquid equilibria and the solubility of gases in liquids is arbitrary. It is generally accepted that the equilibrium set up at 300K between a typical gas such as argon and a liquid such as water is gas-liquid solubility whereas the equilibrium set up between hexane and cyclohexane at 350K is an example of vapor-liquid equilibrium. However, the distinction between gas-liquid solubility and vapor-liquid equilibrium is often not so clear. The equilibria set up between methane and propane above the critical temperature of methane and below the criti­ cal temperature of propane may be classed as vapor-liquid equilibrium or as gas-liquid solubility depending on the particular range of pressure considered and the particular worker concerned.
  • Producing Nitrogen Via Pressure Swing Adsorption

    Producing Nitrogen Via Pressure Swing Adsorption

    Reactions and Separations Producing Nitrogen via Pressure Swing Adsorption Svetlana Ivanova Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) can be a Robert Lewis Air Products cost-effective method of onsite nitrogen generation for a wide range of purity and flow requirements. itrogen gas is a staple of the chemical industry. effective, and convenient for chemical processors. Multiple Because it is an inert gas, nitrogen is suitable for a nitrogen technologies and supply modes now exist to meet a Nwide range of applications covering various aspects range of specifications, including purity, usage pattern, por- of chemical manufacturing, processing, handling, and tability, footprint, and power consumption. Choosing among shipping. Due to its low reactivity, nitrogen is an excellent supply options can be a challenge. Onsite nitrogen genera- blanketing and purging gas that can be used to protect valu- tors, such as pressure swing adsorption (PSA) or membrane able products from harmful contaminants. It also enables the systems, can be more cost-effective than traditional cryo- safe storage and use of flammable compounds, and can help genic distillation or stored liquid nitrogen, particularly if an prevent combustible dust explosions. Nitrogen gas can be extremely high purity (e.g., 99.9999%) is not required. used to remove contaminants from process streams through methods such as stripping and sparging. Generating nitrogen gas Because of the widespread and growing use of nitrogen Industrial nitrogen gas can be produced by either in the chemical process industries (CPI), industrial gas com- cryogenic fractional distillation of liquefied air, or separa- panies have been continually improving methods of nitrogen tion of gaseous air using adsorption or permeation.
  • Application Note 160

    Application Note 160

    APPLICATION NOTE 160 Degas Options for Sample Preparation Introduction A degas study was conducted to determine the effectiveness 1. Inert environment – shift from of flow versus vacuum degas. An amorphous silica- adsorbed phase to inert. alumina and a microporous zeolite were prepared by both techniques and then nitrogen isotherms were collected 2. Heat – increase the rate. for both materials. The resulting isotherms established equivalence between vacuum versus flow degas. Vacuum versus Flowing Degas Methods In the present study we accept that temperature may be controlled by various methods and that commercial temperature controllers provide repeatable performance. Rather than studying temperature control, this document will evaluate the topic of vacuum versus flowing degas. 1. Vacuum degas utilizes mass action as the only method for shifting the chemical equilibrium. An adsorbed molecule has a concentration on the surface, C and a negligible pressure, P=0 in the vapor phase. The pressure is maintained near zero since the sample is in a vacuum. Heating the sample increases the rate of transfer from the adsorbed molecules to the inert environment. 2. Flowing degas also utilizes mass action Theory by constant inert purge. The desorbed molecules are swept from the system Typical degas options include vacuum or flowing degas. The via the continuous inert gas flow and the basic concept of degas is quite simple. The sample material partial pressure of the desorbed molecules is placed in an inert environment. This inert environment in an inert stream approaches zero in a exploits chemical potential and creates a favorable state for manner similar to the vacuum technique.
  • AP Chemistry Chapter 5 Gases Ch

    AP Chemistry Chapter 5 Gases Ch

    AP Chemistry Chapter 5 Gases Ch. 5 Gases Agenda 23 September 2017 Per 3 & 5 ○ 5.1 Pressure ○ 5.2 The Gas Laws ○ 5.3 The Ideal Gas Law ○ 5.4 Gas Stoichiometry ○ 5.5 Dalton’s Law of Partial Pressures ○ 5.6 The Kinetic Molecular Theory of Gases ○ 5.7 Effusion and Diffusion ○ 5.8 Real Gases ○ 5.9 Characteristics of Several Real Gases ○ 5.10 Chemistry in the Atmosphere 5.1 Units of Pressure 760 mm Hg = 760 Torr = 1 atm Pressure = Force = Newton = pascal (Pa) Area m2 5.2 Gas Laws of Boyle, Charles and Avogadro PV = k Slope = k V = k P y = k(1/P) + 0 5.2 Gas Laws of Boyle - use the actual data from Boyle’s Experiment Table 5.1 And Desmos to plot Volume vs. Pressure And then Pressure vs 1/V. And PV vs. V And PV vs. P Boyle’s Law 3 centuries later? Boyle’s law only holds precisely at very low pressures.Measurements at higher pressures reveal PV is not constant, but varies as pressure varies. Deviations slight at pressures close to 1 atm we assume gases obey Boyle’s law in our calcs. A gas that strictly obeys Boyle’s Law is called an Ideal gas. Extrapolate (extend the line beyond the experimental points) back to zero pressure to find “ideal” value for k, 22.41 L atm Look Extrapolatefamiliar? (extend the line beyond the experimental points) back to zero pressure to find “ideal” value for k, 22.41 L atm The volume of a gas at constant pressure increases linearly with the Charles’ Law temperature of the gas.
  • THE SOLUBILITY of GASES in LIQUIDS INTRODUCTION the Solubility Data Project Aims to Make a Comprehensive Search of the Lit- Erat

    THE SOLUBILITY of GASES in LIQUIDS INTRODUCTION the Solubility Data Project Aims to Make a Comprehensive Search of the Lit- Erat

    THE SOLUBILITY OF GASES IN LIQUIDS R. Battino, H. L. Clever and C. L. Young INTRODUCTION The Solubility Data Project aims to make a comprehensive search of the lit­ erature for data on the solubility of gases, liquids and solids in liquids. Data of suitable accuracy are compiled into data sheets set out in a uni­ form format. The data for each system are evaluated and where data of suf­ ficient accuracy are available values recommended and in some cases a smoothing equation suggested to represent the variation of solubility with pressure and/or temperature. A text giving an evaluation and recommended values and the compiled data sheets are pUblished on consecutive pages. DEFINITION OF GAS SOLUBILITY The distinction between vapor-liquid equilibria and the solUbility of gases in liquids is arbitrary. It is generally accepted that the equilibrium set up at 300K between a typical gas such as argon and a liquid such as water is gas liquid solubility whereas the equilibrium set up between hexane and cyclohexane at 350K is an example of vapor-liquid equilibrium. However, the distinction between gas-liquid solUbility and vapor-liquid equilibrium is often not so clear. The equilibria set up between methane and propane above the critical temperature of methane and below the critical temperature of propane may be classed as vapor-liquid equilibrium or as gas-liquid solu­ bility depending on the particular range of pressure considered and the par­ ticular worker concerned. The difficulty partly stems from our inability to rigorously distinguish between a gas, a vapor, and a liquid, which has been discussed in numerous textbooks.
  • Degas Backfill Gas Selection for Micromeritics Gas Adsorption Instruments

    Degas Backfill Gas Selection for Micromeritics Gas Adsorption Instruments

    Application Note 73 Degas Backfill Gas Selection for Micromeritics Gas Adsorption Instruments Introduction adsorbed gas is one type of contaminant that you Specific surface areas and pore volume distribu- wish to remove during degassing, using nitrogen tions are often determined using gas adsorption as the backfill gas partially defeats the purpose of techniques. Prior to analysis, any adsorbed gas or degassing. Obviously, nitrogen is not a true inert vapor phase (such as water or other volatiles) gas when it comes to microporous materials. should be removed from the sample. This process is often referred to as degassing the sample. Therefore, for materials which tend to adsorb nitrogen, helium is a better choice as the backfill Degassing usually involves either heating the gas. Helium adsorption at room temperature is sample or flowing an inert gas across the sample negligible, even in the high energy pores of most during evacuation. In either case, molecules being microporous samples. desorbed from the surface of the sample are removed from the sample tube. After degassing, There are some highly microporous materials in the sample tube can be sealed and removed in one which helium (if used as the backfill gas) is ex- of the following conditions: tremely difficult to remove due to diffusion. Complete removal requires great care as well as • Under vacuum using the TranSealTM, an appa- time-consuming tasks. Otherwise its presence can ratus which is inserted into the sample tube. It severely distort an adsorption isotherm. is designed to close when removed from the degassing port and open automatically when For samples where neither nitrogen nor helium are installed on the sample port, maintaining a ideal, a vacuum-sealed transfer is the most vacuum-tight seal.
  • Computer Simulation Applied to Studying Continuous Spirit Distillation and Product Quality Control

    Computer Simulation Applied to Studying Continuous Spirit Distillation and Product Quality Control

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Food Control 22 (2011) 1592e1603 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Food Control journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodcont Computer simulation applied to studying continuous spirit distillation and product quality control Fabio R.M. Batista, Antonio J.A. Meirelles* Laboratory EXTRAE, Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Food Engineering, University of Campinas e UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil article info abstract Article history: This work aims to study continuous spirit distillation by computational simulation, presenting some Received 7 June 2010 strategies of process control to regulate the volatile content. The commercial simulator Aspen (Plus and Received in revised form dynamics) was selected. A standard solution containing ethanol, water and 10 minor components rep- 2 March 2011 resented the wine to be distilled. A careful investigation of the vaporeliquid equilibrium was performed Accepted 8 March 2011 for the simulation of two different industrial plants. The simulation procedure was validated against experimental results collected from an industrial plant for bioethanol distillation. The simulations were Keywords: conducted with and without the presence of a degassing system, in order to evaluate the efficiency of Spirits fi Distillation this system in the control of the volatile content. To improve the ef ciency of the degassing system, fl Simulation a control loop based on a feedback controller was developed. The results showed that re ux ratio and Aspen Plus product flow rate have an important influence on the spirit composition. High reflux ratios and spirit Degassing flow rates allow for better control of spirit contamination.
  • Liquid Degassing and Gasification Solutions

    Liquid Degassing and Gasification Solutions

    CARBONATION NITROGENATION LIQUID DEGASSING AND DECARBONATION GASIFICATION SOLUTIONS Providing sanitary processing equipment and customized services Since 1885 CO2 Control of Beer Adjust the carbonation level in beer. Sometimes natural fermentation does not create enough CO2 for the end product which impacts taste and the head of a beer. On the same note, removal of excess CO2 in over-carbonated beer is also an easy process. Nitrogenation of Beer There is a niche market for stout beer where nitrogen is added to beer to improve the foam head on top of the beer. Liqui-Cel® Membranes Liqui-Cel membrane contactors are leading gas transfer devices, commonly used in carbon dioxide removal, deoxygenation, nitrogenation and carbonation. Capable of achieving <1 ppm CO2 and <1 ppb O2, they provide precision in gas control. Because of their cleanliness and predictability, Liqui-Cel membranes are the standard degassing technology in ultrapure water applications. Due to the small footprint, lower installation costs and modular nature of the system, they provide flexibility and can be readily expanded to meet growing capacity. Membranes come in multiple sizes so that you can maximize efficiency and performance while taking into account the desired flow rate and footprint requirements. Need more info? Contact your local sales representative or visit our website at www.mgnewell.com. CREATE A SMOOTH BEER—A “KEG” BEER HOW IT WORKS Liqui-Cel membranes use a microporous hollow fiber membrane to add and/or remove gases from liquids. The hollow fiber is knitted into an array and wrapped around a center tube inside of the membrane housing.
  • CEE 370 Environmental Engineering Principles Henry's

    CEE 370 Environmental Engineering Principles Henry's

    CEE 370 Lecture #7 9/18/2019 Updated: 18 September 2019 Print version CEE 370 Environmental Engineering Principles Lecture #7 Environmental Chemistry V: Thermodynamics, Henry’s Law, Acids-bases II Reading: Mihelcic & Zimmerman, Chapter 3 Davis & Masten, Chapter 2 Mihelcic, Chapt 3 David Reckhow CEE 370 L#7 1 Henry’s Law Henry's Law states that the amount of a gas that dissolves into a liquid is proportional to the partial pressure that gas exerts on the surface of the liquid. In equation form, that is: C AH = K p A where, CA = concentration of A, [mol/L] or [mg/L] KH = equilibrium constant (often called Henry's Law constant), [mol/L-atm] or [mg/L-atm] pA = partial pressure of A, [atm] David Reckhow CEE 370 L#7 2 Lecture #7 Dave Reckhow 1 CEE 370 Lecture #7 9/18/2019 Henry’s Law Constants Reaction Name Kh, mol/L-atm pKh = -log Kh -2 CO2(g) _ CO2(aq) Carbon 3.41 x 10 1.47 dioxide NH3(g) _ NH3(aq) Ammonia 57.6 -1.76 -1 H2S(g) _ H2S(aq) Hydrogen 1.02 x 10 0.99 sulfide -3 CH4(g) _ CH4(aq) Methane 1.50 x 10 2.82 -3 O2(g) _ O2(aq) Oxygen 1.26 x 10 2.90 David Reckhow CEE 370 L#7 3 Example: Solubility of O2 in Water Background Although the atmosphere we breathe is comprised of approximately 20.9 percent oxygen, oxygen is only slightly soluble in water. In addition, the solubility decreases as the temperature increases.
  • "Determination of Total Organic Carbon and Specific UV

    "Determination of Total Organic Carbon and Specific UV

    EPA Document #: EPA/600/R-05/055 METHOD 415.3 DETERMINATION OF TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON AND SPECIFIC UV ABSORBANCE AT 254 nm IN SOURCE WATER AND DRINKING WATER Revision 1.1 February, 2005 B. B. Potter, USEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory J. C. Wimsatt, The National Council On The Aging, Senior Environmental Employment Program NATIONAL EXPOSURE RESEARCH LABORATORY OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268 415.3 - 1 METHOD 415.3 DETERMINATION OF TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON AND SPECIFIC UV ABSORBANCE AT 254 nm IN SOURCE WATER AND DRINKING WATER 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1 This method provides procedures for the determination of total organic carbon (TOC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and UV absorption at 254 nm (UVA) in source waters and drinking waters. The DOC and UVA determinations are used in the calculation of the Specific UV Absorbance (SUVA). For TOC and DOC analysis, the sample is acidified and the inorganic carbon (IC) is removed prior to analysis for organic carbon (OC) content using a TOC instrument system. The measurements of TOC and DOC are based on calibration with potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP) standards. This method is not intended for use in the analysis of treated or untreated industrial wastewater discharges as those wastewater samples may damage or contaminate the instrument system(s). 1.2 The three (3) day, pooled organic carbon detection limit (OCDL) is based on the detection limit (DL) calculation.1 It is a statistical determination of precision, and may be below the level of quantitation.
  • Unit 5 Interactive Notebook Gas Laws and Kinetic Molecular Theory Grant Union High School January 6, 2014 – January 29, 2014

    Unit 5 Interactive Notebook Gas Laws and Kinetic Molecular Theory Grant Union High School January 6, 2014 – January 29, 2014

    Unit 5 Interactive Notebook Gas Laws and Kinetic Molecular Theory Grant Union High School January 6, 2014 – January 29, 2014 Student Mastery Scale of Learning Goals Date Page Std Learning Goal Homework Mastery 1/6/14 1/7/14 1/8/14 1/9/14 1/10/14 1/13/14 1/14/14 1/15/14 1 1/16/14 1/21/14 1/22/14 1/23/14 1/24/14 1/27/14 1/28/14 1/29/14 Unit 5 EXAM 2 California Standard Gas Laws 4. The kinetic molecular theory describes the motion of atoms and molecules and explains the properties of gases. As a basis for understanding this concept: a. Students know the random motion of molecules and their collisions with a surface create the observable pressure on that surface. Fluids, gases or liquids, consist of molecules that freely move past each other in random directions. Intermolecular forces hold the atoms or molecules in liquids close to each other. Gases consist of tiny particles, either atoms or molecules, spaced far apart from each other and free to move at high speeds. Pressure is defined as force per unit area. The force in fluids comes from collisions of atoms or molecules with the walls of a container. Air pressure is created by the weight of the gas in the atmosphere striking surfaces. Gravity pulls air molecules toward Earth, the surface that they strike. Water pressure can be understood in the same fashion, but the pressures are much greater because of the greater density of water.