DOCSLIB.ORG

Royal Charters and Parliamentary Scrutiny

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Library Note Royal Charters and Parliamentary Scrutiny This Library briefing provides information on royal charters, outlining the Sovereign’s prerogative power to grant them, and briefly describing their function. It also provides an overview of two examples of royal charters—the self-regulation of the press and the BBC—and discusses Parliament’s role in their scrutiny. Royal Charters: Overview Royal charters incorporate a body, turning it from a collection of individuals into a single legal entity. They are granted by the Sovereign on the advice of the Privy Council and are within the royal prerogative. They are legally binding documents, and do not require parliamentary approval. Royal charters and the affairs of chartered bodies are not generally debated in Parliament. The Privy Council advises the Monarch on the exercise of prerogative powers. Those appointed to the Privy Council mostly comprise ministers, other parliamentarians and members of the judiciary. However, its day-to-day business is transacted by those of Her Majesty’s ministers who are Privy Counsellors; that is all cabinet ministers and a number of junior ministers. The Lord President of the Council is the head of the Privy Council Office. The current Lord President is Chris Grayling, the Leader of the House of Commons. Royal Charter of the Self-regulation of the Press On 30 October 2013, a Royal Charter on press regulation was granted, which established the Press Recognition Panel (PRP). The PRP is responsible for certifying applications for recognition from press regulators, and to oversee any such body. The drafting of the royal charter was subject to cross-party talks between the three largest political parties at the time. The Charter stipulates that amendment to its provisions is subject to parliamentary approval. This requirement is set out in the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, which specifically states that the Royal Charter cannot be altered unless the changes are in accordance with the terms of the Charter. BBC Royal Charter The BBC was established by Royal Charter in 1927, and is subject to periodic reviews. The current Charter expires on 31 December 2016. The Government published its white paper, A BBC for the Future: a Broadcaster of Distinction, in May 2016, which set out its proposals for the new Royal Charter. There has been debate during the renewal process with regard to parliamentary scrutiny of the Charter. There have been calls for Parliament to have an increased role, with suggestions that the draft charter should be subject to parliamentary debate and to a vote, as well as calls for the BBC’s mandate and governance structure to be defined in statute. Sarah Tudor 23 May 2016 LLN 2016/027 Table of Contents 1. Royal Charters: Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Granting Royal Charters: Role of the Sovereign and Privy Council ...................................... 1 1.2 Bodies Constituted by Royal Charter .......................................................................................... 2 2. Royal Charters and Parliamentary Approval: Press Regulation ........................................................ 3 2.1 Leveson Report: Recommendations for Legislation .................................................................. 3 2.2 Proposals for a Royal Charter ........................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Royal Charter on Self-regulation of the Press ............................................................................ 6 3. Royal Charters and Parliamentary Scrutiny: BBC ................................................................................ 7 3.1 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Royal Charter Review: Progress and Developments in 2016 ................................................. 8 3.3 BBC Royal Charter and Debate on Parliamentary Scrutiny .................................................. 13 House of Lords Library Note I Royal Charters and Parliamentary Scrutiny 1 1. Royal Charters: Background Royal charters are granted by the Sovereign on the advice of the Privy Council.1 A royal charter is a way of incorporating a body, turning it from a collection of individuals into a single legal entity. They are legally binding documents, and do not require parliamentary approval.2 Royal charters can be dated back to the 13th century.3 1.1 Granting Royal Charters: Role of the Sovereign and Privy Council The grant of a royal charter to any organisation is an act of grace entirely within the royal prerogative.4 However, the prerogative power of the Crown to grant charters is limited in that it cannot be exercised contrary to the public good or in violation of the common law, and it must not infringe the rights of a subject. The Privy Council advises the Monarch on the exercise of prerogative powers and certain other functions assigned to the Sovereign by acts of parliament.5 Its origins can be dated back to at least the 13th century.6 Those appointed to the Privy Council mostly comprise ministers, other parliamentarians and members of the judiciary.7 However, its day-to-day business is transacted by those of Her Majesty’s ministers who are Privy Counsellors; that is all cabinet ministers and a number of junior ministers.8 The Lord President of the Council is the head of the Privy Council Office. The Lord President is always a cabinet minister and is often the Leader of the House of Commons or House of Lords.9 The current Lord President is Chris Grayling, the Leader of the House of Commons. Privy Council Orders The decisions of the Privy Council are recorded as ‘Orders’, which are usually Government decisions that have been drawn up by ministers and civil servants.10 These are then approved by the Monarch as a matter of course, and have the force of law.11 Orders come in a number of different forms, but the main distinction is between orders in council and orders of council.12 Orders in Council are Orders that have been approved personally by the Monarch at a meeting of the Privy Council. They fall into two broad categories, statutory and prerogative. The Privy Council states that statutory orders are “made under any of the numerous powers contained in acts of parliament which give Her Majesty a power to make orders”. However, prerogative orders are made “under the inherent power of the Crown to act on matters for which Parliament has not legislated”. Orders of council do not require personal approval by the Monarch. These can also be these can be statutory or prerogative. 1 Privy Council, ‘Royal Charters’, accessed 12 May 2016. 2 Department for Culture, Media and Sport, Information Note on the Draft Royal Charter, 12 February 2013, p 2. 3 Privy Council, ‘Royal Charters’, accessed 12 May 2016. 4 Robert Bulling, ‘Royal Charters’, Encyclopaedia of Forms and Precedents, August 2013, vol 33; and Daniel Greenberg, ‘Royal Charters’, Westlaw Insight, 26 February 2016. 5 Privy Council, ‘Privy Council: Overview’, accessed 12 May 2016. 6 House of Commons Library, The Privy Council, 8 February 2016, p 4. 7 Department for Culture, Media and Sport, Information Note on the Draft Royal Charter, 12 February 2013, p 2. 8 Privy Council, ‘Privy Council Members’, accessed 12 May 2016. 9 House of Commons Library, The Privy Council, 8 February 2016, p 4. 10 ibid, p 5. 11 Privy Council, ‘Orders’, accessed 12 May 2016. 12 ibid. 2 House of Lords Library Note I Royal Charters and Parliamentary Scrutiny Prerogative orders are often used to dispatch business, such as the granting of royal charters and the affairs of chartered bodies, which is not thought to be of particular concern to Parliament, and to avoid its time being used to debate such issues.13 For instance, in 2009, the then Lord President of the Council, Baroness Royall of Blaisdon, stated in the House of Lords that: The vast majority of the prerogative business done by the Privy Council is not significant enough for Parliament to want to take it over—for example, the affairs of chartered bodies.14 However, there are instances when matters relating to royal charters and chartered bodies have been debated in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Sections two and three of this paper each briefly describe a high-profile example where a royal charter has been debated in Parliament. 1.2 Bodies Constituted by Royal Charter Charters were formerly used to grant the right to hold markets or fairs, for promoting trade by the incorporation by charter of trading companies, and to establish organisations such as universities and cities.15 Royal charters were at one time the only means of incorporating a body.16 However, bodies can now become incorporated through other methods, such as by becoming a registered body. This has meant that new grants of royal charters are normally reserved for bodies that work in the public interest such as professional, charitable, scientific, and educational or learned non-profit-making institutions or societies.17 The Privy Council states that these bodies need to “demonstrate pre-eminence, stability and permanence in that particular field”.18 The initiation of a royal charter can take place in a number of different ways.19 In most cases an existing organisation can petition the Privy Council to acquire chartered status. However, the state can also sponsor a charter,
Recommended publications
  • To Download Magna Carta FAQ Answers .PDF

    To Download Magna Carta FAQ Answers .PDF

    Magna Carta FAQ: Answers Produced with the support of the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEX) Answers provided by: Professor Nigel Saul Magna Carta FAQ: Answers Q1) WHAT’S MAGNA CARTA DONE FOR ME? Quite simple - it’s because of Magna Carta that we well whatever he liked – and did. After the making of the live in a free country today. Magna Carta affirmed the Charter he was subject to the law like everyone else. In vital principle of freedom under the law. Clause 39 of the mid thirteenth century the lawyer Henry Bracton was the Charter said: ‘no free man shall be imprisoned or to write, ‘in England the king is below God and below the deprived of his lands except by judgement of his peers or law’. by the law of the land’. Clause 40 said: ‘To no one shall we sell, delay or deny right or justice’. Before the making of Magna Carta the king had been able to do pretty Q2) HOW MUCH OF MAGNA CARTA IS STILL ON THE STATUTE BOOK? Very little, in fact. To be precise, just four clauses of the matters? Most definitely not. All great documents are the original 1215 version of the Charter. These are: clause product of specific historical circumstances and lose their 1, guaranteeing the liberties of the Church; clause 13, immediate relevance over time. But that does not mean guaranteeing the liberties of the City of London; and that they can be forgotten or consigned to the historical the famous clauses 39 and 40, guaranteeing due legal waste paper bin.
  • Introduction, the Constitution of the State of Connecticut

    Introduction, the Constitution of the State of Connecticut

    Sacred Heart University DigitalCommons@SHU Government, Politics & Global Studies Faculty Government, Politics & Global Studies Publications 2011 Introduction, The onsC titution of the State of Connecticut Gary L. Rose Sacred Heart University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/gov_fac Part of the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Rose, Gary L., "Introduction, The onC stitution of the State of Connecticut" (2011). Government, Politics & Global Studies Faculty Publications. Paper 2. http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/gov_fac/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Government, Politics & Global Studies at DigitalCommons@SHU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Government, Politics & Global Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SHU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Connecticut license plates boldly bear the inscription, “the Constitution State.” This is due to Connecticut’s long and proud tradition of self-government under the protection of a written constitution. Connecticut’s constitutional tradition can be traced to the Fundamental Orders of 1639. Drafted by repre- sentatives from the three Connecticut River towns of Hartford, Wethersfi eld and Windsor, the Fundamental Orders were the very fi rst constitution known to humankind. The Orders were drafted completely free of British infl uence and established what can be considered as the fi rst self-governing colony in North America. Moreover, Connecticut’s Fundamental Orders can be viewed as the foundation for constitutional government in the western world. In 1662, the Fundamental Orders were replaced by a Royal Charter. Granted to Connecticut by King Charles II, the Royal Charter not only embraced the principles of the Fundamental Orders, but also formally recognized Connecticut’s system of self-government.
  • Category a Death Advice for Arts and Culture

    Category a Death Advice for Arts and Culture

    Advice and guidance: Category A death Advice for arts and culture organisations Introduction This document offers advice and guidance for artists and organisations in the event of the death of a senior member of the Royal Family. You may also wish to follow this guidance following the death of a notable person who has a close and special relationship with your organisation, and/or in the event of a major incident that causes loss of life. For the Royal Household, ‘Category A’ is a term used to describe the most senior members of the Royal Family – The Queen, Prince Philip, Prince Charles, the Duchess of Cornwall and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. It does not apply to other members of the Royal Family. We have not experienced the death of the monarch for over sixty years and most people in the UK have known Queen Elizabeth as the monarch for all of their lives. For your own organisation, you should consider who you should classify as a Category A person, whose death you may wish to mark. In addition to senior members of the Royal Family, it could also be your patrons, artistic leaders, artists or people with particular relevance to the work you do. Examples over recent years of this might be the Duchess of Devonshire for Chatsworth House, Laurence Olivier for the National Theatre. You may also wish to follow or adapt this guidance in the event of a major incident that causes loss of life, in which case this guidance may support your organisation’s Major Incident Plan.
  • Reforming Public Enterprises: Australia

    Reforming Public Enterprises: Australia

    Reforming Public Enterprises: Australia REFORMING PUBLIC ENTERPRISES -- CASE STUDIES AUSTRALIA by John Marsden, Marsden, Jacob and Associates Overview of Public Enterprise Prior to Reform 1. Government business enterprises (GBEs) were a dominant part of Australian life until the late 1980s. At that time, GBEs accounted for almost 10 per cent of gross domestic product, and 16 per cent of net capital stock and were the sole suppliers of electricity, water, gas and communication services for most Australians. In addition, all State and territory governments were involved in banking, finance and transport. While the Commonwealth owned and operated Australia Post, Telecom and two airlines, the majority of GBEs were then, and remain now, under State and territory government ownership and management. 2. Distinguishing features of State and territory GBEs were their limitation to within State boundaries, and specialisation within sectors. 3. GBE reform in Australia was essentially a private and individual matter for each government until 1990 when Prime Minister Hawke and New South Wales Premier Greiner combined to establish the Special Premier’s Conference (SPC) process. Prior to 1990, each government had adopted and pursued their own agenda of reform and there was little or no interchange or discussion between the various governments. The assembling of all Australian governments to address issues of micro-economic policy under the SPCs and the subsequent meetings of the Council of Australian Government (COAG) has co- ordinated, extended and documented GBE reform. However, observations of key events and drivers in the process of GBE reform prior to 1990 are necessarily personal and selective. Figure 1.1.
  • Royal Charter and By-Laws

    Royal Charter and By-Laws

    Royal Charter and By-Laws About APM Association for Project Management (APM) is the only chartered body for the project profession, with over 30,000 individual members and more than 500 organisations participating in our Corporate Partnership Programme. As a registered educational charity, we are committed to developing and promoting the value of project management in order to deliver improved project outcomes for the benefi t of society. 2 Contents Page 4 Royal Charter Page 4 Association for Project Management 2 OBJECT 3 POWERS Page 5 4 MATTERS RELATED TO PROPERTY Page 6 5 BENEFITS TO MEMBERS AND TRUSTEES Page 7 6 CHARTER CHANGES 7 BY-LAW CHANGES Page 8 8 SURRENDER OF CHARTER 9 CONCLUSION Page 9 By-Laws Page 9 INTERPRETATION Page 10 MEMBERSHIP Page 11 THE REGISTER OF CHARTERED PROJECT PROFESSIONALS IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUBSCRIPTION THE BOARD Page 12 THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE Page 13 THE CONDUCT OF GENERAL MEETINGS Page 14 ACCOUNTS AUDIT OR EXAMINATION Page 15 NOTICES Note: APM's Royal Charter was sealed on 25 November 2016. This version incorporates changes approved by the Privy Council on 12 February 2020. 3 ELIZABETH THE SECOND by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Our other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith: TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME, GREETING! WHEREAS the incorporated organisation commonly known as the Association for Project Management has petitioned Us for a Charter of Incorporation, AND WHEREAS We have taken the said Petition
  • English Settlement and Local Governance Mary Sarah Bilder Boston College Law School, Bilder@Bc.Edu

    English Settlement and Local Governance Mary Sarah Bilder Boston College Law School, [email protected]

    Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers 11-2008 English Settlement and Local Governance Mary Sarah Bilder Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Mary Sarah Bilder. "English Settlement and Local Governance." The Cambridge History of Law in America Volume 1: Early America (1580–1815), Cambridge University Press (2008): 63-103. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge Histories Online http://universitypublishingonline.org/cambridge/histories/ The Cambridge History of Law in America Edited by Michael Grossberg, Christopher Tomlins Book DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521803052 Online ISBN: 9781139054171 Hardback ISBN: 9780521803052 Paperback ISBN: 9781107605053 Chapter 3 - English Settlement and Local Governance pp. 63-103 Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521803052.004 Cambridge University Press P1:JZP 9780521803052c03 CUFX175/Grossberg 978 0 521 80305 2 August 31, 2007 3:30 3 english settlement and local governance mary sarah bilder In late 1584, as Sir Walter Raleigh began to organize an effort to send settlers to Roanoke Island, an anonymous author asked, “What manner of geouernement is to be vsed and what offics to geouerne?”1 The mysterious end to the Roanoke settlement offers no answer.
  • National Citizen Service Trust Draft Royal Charter

    National Citizen Service Trust Draft Royal Charter

    National Citizen Service Trust Draft Royal Charter Presented to Parliament by the Minister for Civil Society by Command of Her Majesty January 2017 Cm 9393 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474139854 PDF ISBN 9781474139861 ID 06011708 01/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office CONTENTS 4. Introduction 8. Draft Royal Charter for the National Citizen Service Trust 3 INTRODUCTION The National Citizen Service Trust Draft Royal Charter accompanies the National Citizen Service Bill (NCS Bill), introduced in the House of Lords on 11th October 2016. This draft has been updated to accompany the Bill in the House of Commons. National Citizen Service (NCS) has been available since 2011 and exists to promote social cohesion, social engagement and social mobility. It is a once- in-a-lifetime opportunity that helps young people build skills for work and life, while taking on new challenges and meeting new friends.
  • Nber Working Paper Series the East Indian Monopoly

    Nber Working Paper Series the East Indian Monopoly

    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE EAST INDIAN MONOPOLY AND THE TRANSITION FROM LIMITED ACCESS IN ENGLAND, 1600-1813 Dan Bogart Working Paper 21536 http://www.nber.org/papers/w21536 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 September 2015 I would like to thank conference and seminar participants at Yale University and Colby College. I would also like to thank Richard Grossman, Stergios Skaperdas, John Wallis, Naomi Lamoreaux, Barry Weingast, Sandra Bogart, and Jean Laurent Rosenthal for valuable comments on earlier drafts. I would like to thank Mark Dincecco for kindly providing data, and I would also like to thank Kara Dimitruk for valuable research assistance. All errors are my own. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2015 by Dan Bogart. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The East Indian Monopoly and the Transition from Limited Access in England, 1600-1813 Dan Bogart NBER Working Paper No. 21536 September 2015 JEL No. N00,N13,N43,N73 ABSTRACT Many markets are limited by laws and customs enforced by political and religious authorities. North, Wallis, and Weingast (2009) argue that the transition from limited access requires a series of steps like rule of law for elites and the creation of perpetually lived organizations.
  • The University of Victoria Undergraduate Journal of History

    The University of Victoria Undergraduate Journal of History

    The University of Victoria Undergraduate Journal of History VOLUME 1, NO. 1 2013 Philip of Spain, English King? The Iconography of an English Royal Charter CARLEIGH NICHOLLS In 1553, Mary Tudor came to the throne of England after years of personal, political and religious turmoil. Her father, King Henry VIII, had broken from the Roman Catholic Church in order to divorce her mother, the Spanish Catherine of Aragon, and marry Anne Boleyn. He had himself proclaimed the Head of the newly created Church of England. When Mary became queen, her personal mission was to restore England to the ‘true faith’: Catholicism. As she was England’s first regnant queen, she had to contend with preconceived notions that a woman was not fit to rule. In 1554, she married Philip II of Spain, which only served to increase agitation about female authority. Philip was a member of the great Hapsburg dynasty which ruled over much of Europe. Would Mary’s Hapsburg husband be willing to take on the role of king consort, or would England be absorbed into the Spanish empire? These were problematic questions that the union brought on. After the marriage, Philip’s image became synonymous with Mary’s throughout England. The couple was presented together on numerous documents and paintings as co- monarchs. This paper examines a Marian Royal Letters Patent and utilizes it as a case study for analyzing the larger historical issues of the reign through an examination of the iconography which decorates the charter and the attached Great Seal. The charter in question grants to William Babington lordship over the Manor of Broadway in Worcestershire (Figure 1).
  • Charter'' for the Empire, Resurrecting the Myth of Magna Carta During The

    Charter'' for the Empire, Resurrecting the Myth of Magna Carta During The

    A Magna ”Charter” for the Empire, resurrecting the myth of Magna Carta during the American revolution Françoise Le Jeune To cite this version: Françoise Le Jeune. A Magna ”Charter” for the Empire, resurrecting the myth of Magna Carta during the American revolution. Magna Carta Trust„ Nov 2015, Amiens, France. hal-03298925 HAL Id: hal-03298925 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03298925 Submitted on 25 Jul 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A Magna “Charter” for the Empire, resurrecting the myth of Magna Carta during the American revolution Françoise Le Jeune (Université de Nantes – CRHIA) In this article I will argue that between 1765 and 1772, the myth of the English Magna Carta was resurrected with patriotic emotion, by some Anglo-American colonists who identified the so-called intent, solemnity, contractual form and political content of the original Magna “Charter” with their colonial charters. I will show that Samuel Adams and other patriots began to see their Royal charters, particularly the 1691 Massachusetts Bay charter, as a Magna “Charter” for the Empire. In doing so, in claiming some palimpsestic approach between the centuries’ old Charta and late 17th century colonial charters, patriots displayed an early American example of “constitutional patriotism”, by which they invested a lot of emotion in the original constitution, be it their own or the original Magna Carta.
  • Ofcom Annual Report 2018/19

    Ofcom Annual Report 2018/19

    The Office of Communications Annual Report & Accounts For the period 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019 The Office of Communications Annual Report & Accounts For the period 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Paragraphs 11 and 12 of Schedule 1 of the Office of Communications Act 2002 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 10 July 2019 HC 2321 Ofcom is the UK regulator for the communications services that we use and rely on each day. Our vision is to make communications work for everyone. We regulate broadband and mobile telecoms, TV, radio, video-on-demand services, post, and the airwaves used by wireless devices. Our work benefits consumers and UK businesses to get the best from communications services. We ensure consumer fairness and protection from sharp practices and we actively support competition where appropriate to deliver good outcomes. Ofcom is an independent public authority, funded by fees paid to us by the companies we regulate. Our duties come from Parliament. © Ofcom Copyright 2019 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Ofcom copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] This publication is available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications Ofcom ARA 2018-2019 ISBN 978-1-5286-1216-6 CCS0419980080 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum.
  • Royal Charter, Byelaws and Regulations

    Royal Charter, Byelaws and Regulations

    Royal Charter Bye-laws and Regulations 150219 Signed Minutes.pdf ` Contents Royal Charter …………………………………………………..……………….……… 1 Bye-laws ……………………………………………………….………………………... 8 Regulations …………………………………………………………………………….. 18 Appendix 1 ……………………………………………………………………………… 37 Index …………………………………………………………..………………………… 40 ROYAL CHARTER ELIZABETH THE SECOND By the grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Our other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith: TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME, GREETING! WHEREAS an humble Petition has been presented unto Us by the company incorporated in the year of our Lord One thousand nine hundred and nineteen under the Companies Acts 1908 to 1917 and now known as ‘The Institute of Cost and Management Accountants’ (hereinafter called ‘the Company’) praying for the grant of a Charter of Incorporation: AND WHEREAS We have taken the said Petition into Our Royal Consideration and are minded to accede thereto: NOW KNOW YE that We by virtue of Our Prerogative Royal and of Our especial grace, certain knowledge and mere motion have willed and ordained and by these Presents for Us, Our Heirs and Successors do will and ordain as follows: 1 The persons who are now the members of the Company and all such persons as shall hereafter pursuant to this Our Charter and the Bye-laws become Members of the Body Corporate hereby constituted and their successors, shall forever hereafter be by virtue of these Presents one Body Corporate and Politic by the name of ‘The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants,’ (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Institute’) and by the same name shall have perpetual succession and a Common Seal, with power to break, alter and make anew the said Seal from time to time at their will and pleasure, and by the same name shall and may sue, and be sued in all Courts, and in all manner of actions and suits, and shall have power to do all other matters and things incidental or appertaining to a Body Corporate.