DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic Sustainability Plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic Sustainability Plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Economic Sustainability Plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Delta Protection Commission Economic Sustainability Plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Prepared for: Delta Protection Commission January 19, 2012 Prepared by: Business Forecasting Center, Eberhardt School of Business, University of the Pacific The Dangermond Group Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Sapper West, Inc. Garcia DeCredico Studio Natural Resources Institute, University of the Pacific Peterson Brustad, Inc. © Delta Protection Commission, 2012 Licensed Under the Creative Commons Deed: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) Table of Contents List of Figures.......................................................................................................................... 7 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... 8 List of Boxes............................................................................................................................ 9 Acronyms & Abbreviations .................................................................................................... 10 Glossary of Key Terms .......................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 1: Introduction .......................................................................................................... 17 Part One: Background and Context for the Economic Sustainability Plan ............................ 23 Chapter 2: Overview of the People and Economy of the Delta ............................................. 24 2.1 Overview and Key Findings ...................................................................................... 24 2.2 The People of the Delta ............................................................................................ 25 2.2.1 Demographic Conditions and Trends .................................................................... 25 2.2.2 Housing Trends ..................................................................................................... 29 2.2.3 Labor Force Participation and Commute Patterns ................................................ 29 2.3 Baseline Economic Conditions and Trends in the Delta ........................................... 30 2.3.1 Employment by Sector .......................................................................................... 30 2.3.2 Location Quotient Analysis .................................................................................... 31 2.3.3 Export Orientation ................................................................................................. 34 Chapter 3: The Delta Ecosystem and Economic Sustainability ............................................ 35 3.1 Brief Background ...................................................................................................... 35 3.2 Stressors ................................................................................................................... 36 3.3 Possible conservation and ecosystem restoration measures ................................... 37 3.4 Potential Impacts of Ecosystem Restoration on the Delta Economy ........................ 39 3.5 Ranking Delta Ecosystem Restoration Proposals for Economic Sustainability ........ 39 Chapter 4: Review of Key Policies and Planning Processes ................................................ 41 4.1 County General Plans and the Delta ........................................................................ 42 4.1.1 Contra Costa County ............................................................................................. 43 4.1.2 Sacramento County ............................................................................................... 44 4.1.3 San Joaquin County .............................................................................................. 46 4.1.4 Solano County ....................................................................................................... 47 4.1.5 Yolo County ........................................................................................................... 48 4.2 Delta Protection Commission Land Use and Resource Management Plan .............. 49 4.3 State of California Planning for the Delta .................................................................. 50 4.3.1 Delta Vision ........................................................................................................... 50 4.3.2 Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy ...................................................... 51 Economic Sustainability Plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta 4.3.3 Delta Reform Act of 2009 ...................................................................................... 52 4.3.4 Delta Stewardship Council Delta Plan ................................................................... 52 4.4 Bay Delta Conservation Plan .................................................................................... 53 4.5 Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 55 Chapter 5: Flood, Earthquake and Sea-Level Rise Risk Management ................................. 56 5.1 Overview and Key Findings ...................................................................................... 56 5.2 Background ............................................................................................................... 57 5.3 Status of Delta Levees .............................................................................................. 66 5.3.1 Categories of Levees ............................................................................................ 66 5.3.2 Levee Standards ................................................................................................... 71 5.3.3 Previous Studies of Delta Levees ......................................................................... 76 5.4 Risk Reduction Strategies ......................................................................................... 83 5.4.1 Improve the robustness of the existing levees ...................................................... 83 5.4.2 Improve inspections, maintenance, and emergency preparedness and response to prevent failures .................................................................................................................... 85 5.4.3 Improve both immediate response and longer-term recovery after failures .......... 86 5.4.4 Current planning efforts ......................................................................................... 86 5.4.5 Discussion of Alternate Risk Reduction Strategies ............................................... 88 5.4.6 Economics of Risk Reduction Strategies .............................................................. 88 5.5 Levee Improvement Strategies and Funding ............................................................ 93 5.6 Periodic Update of the Flood Management Plan for the Delta .................................. 99 5.7 Responses to Independent Review Panel .............................................................. 100 Part Two: Analysis of Key Economic Sectors in the Delta .................................................. 104 Chapter 6: Framework for Analysis ..................................................................................... 105 6.1 Baseline Scenario ................................................................................................... 105 6.2 Isolated Conveyance Scenario ............................................................................... 106 6.3 Habitat Conservation Scenarios ............................................................................. 108 6.4 Levee Scenarios ..................................................................................................... 109 6.5 Regulatory Scenarios .............................................................................................. 110 6.6 Delta Vision Strategies ............................................................................................ 111 Chapter 7: Agriculture ......................................................................................................... 112 7.1 Overview and Key findings ..................................................................................... 112 7.2 Current Status and Trends ...................................................................................... 113 7.2.1 Mapping Delta Agriculture ................................................................................... 113 7.2.2 Crop Categories .................................................................................................. 114 7.2.3 Delta Agricultural Acreage ................................................................................... 115 7.2.4 Delta Agricultural Revenues ................................................................................ 119 Economic Sustainability Plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Page 2 7.3 Economic Impact of Delta Agriculture ..................................................................... 121 7.3.1 Animal Production in the Delta ............................................................................ 121 7.3.2 Value Added Processing: Food and Beverage Manufacturing ............................ 121 7.3.3 Economic Impact Estimates ...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office
    Woodland RD Name RD Number Atlas Tract 2126 5 !"#$ Bacon Island 2028 !"#$80 Bethel Island BIMID Bishop Tract 2042 16 ·|}þ Bixler Tract 2121 Lovdal Boggs Tract 0404 ·|}þ113 District Sacramento River at I Street Bridge Bouldin Island 0756 80 Gaging Station )*+,- Brack Tract 2033 Bradford Island 2059 ·|}þ160 Brannan-Andrus BALMD Lovdal 50 Byron Tract 0800 Sacramento Weir District ¤£ r Cache Haas Area 2098 Y o l o ive Canal Ranch 2086 R Mather Can-Can/Greenhead 2139 Sacramento ican mer Air Force Chadbourne 2034 A Base Coney Island 2117 Port of Dead Horse Island 2111 Sacramento ¤£50 Davis !"#$80 Denverton Slough 2134 West Sacramento Drexler Tract Drexler Dutch Slough 2137 West Egbert Tract 0536 Winters Sacramento Ehrheardt Club 0813 Putah Creek ·|}þ160 ·|}þ16 Empire Tract 2029 ·|}þ84 Fabian Tract 0773 Sacramento Fay Island 2113 ·|}þ128 South Fork Putah Creek Executive Airport Frost Lake 2129 haven s Lake Green d n Glanville 1002 a l r Florin e h Glide District 0765 t S a c r a m e n t o e N Glide EBMUD Grand Island 0003 District Pocket Freeport Grizzly West 2136 Lake Intake Hastings Tract 2060 l Holland Tract 2025 Berryessa e n Holt Station 2116 n Freeport 505 h Honker Bay 2130 %&'( a g strict Elk Grove u Lisbon Di Hotchkiss Tract 0799 h lo S C Jersey Island 0830 Babe l Dixon p s i Kasson District 2085 s h a King Island 2044 S p Libby Mcneil 0369 y r !"#$5 ·|}þ99 B e !"#$80 t Liberty Island 2093 o l a Lisbon District 0307 o Clarksburg Y W l a Little Egbert Tract 2084 S o l a n o n p a r C Little Holland Tract 2120 e in e a e M Little Mandeville
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for the Shiloh Iii Wind Plant Project Habitat Conservation Plan
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE SHILOH III WIND PLANT PROJECT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN P REPARED BY: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2800 Cottage Way, W-2650 Sacramento, CA 95825 Contact: Mike Thomas, Chief Habitat Conservation Planning Branch W ITH TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FROM: ICF International 630 K Street, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95814 Contact: Brad Schafer 916.737.3000 February 2011 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Draft Environmental Assessment for the Shiloh III Wind Plant Project Habitat Conservation Plan. February. (ICF 00263.09). Sacramento, CA. With technical assistance from ICF International, Sacramento, CA. Contents Chapter 1 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 1‐1 1.2 Species Covered by the HCP ...................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.3 Proposed Action Addressed in this EA ....................................................................................... 1‐2 1.4 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action .......................................................................... 1‐2 Chapter 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives .................................................................................. 2‐1 2.1 Alternative 1: Proposed Action .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Building Communities – Economics & Ethnicity
    Building Communities – Economics & Ethnicity Jennifer Helzer, California State University, Stanislaus Helzer, 1 Delta Protection Commission Delta Narratives (Revision Final) June 11, 2015 Building Communities – Economics & Ethnicity Jennifer Helzer, California State University, Stanislaus INTRODUCTION Approaching the Delta from the east, off of Interstate 5, the hurried and harried pace of life gives way to a gradual western sloping landscape of manicured fields. As the morning fog burns away, glimpses of old barns, field equipment, and neatly stacked fruit crates appear alongside the road. As one approaches town, heavy‐duty pick‐up trucks meet at the four‐way stop with their driver motioning for visitors to take the right‐of‐way. The post office and local coffee shop buzz with morning routines. A tour through the Delta carries visitors along levee roads, across iconic bridges and into culturally rich historic towns. Orchards and row crops expand from levee roads; and farmsteads and stately homes exist alongside ethnic heritage landscapes and new commercial developments. The communities of the Delta are places of the present and the past that are stitched together by a network of railroads, canals and levees, and by the open spaces that link them together. These are the first impressions of the Delta as a place and the start of many questions. What is the meaning of this place, who made this place and how has it changed through time? In the 1850s, powerful economic, political and social forces precipitated momentous change in the Delta region of California: 1) the California Gold Rush, 2) levee construction and agricultural development, and 3) the migration and settlement of domestic, European and Asian cultural groups.
    [Show full text]
  • California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Karl E
    California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Karl E. Longley, ScD, P.E., Chair Linda S. Adams Arnold 11020 Sun Center Drive #200, Rancho Cordova, California 95670-6114 Secretary for Phone (916) 464-3291 • FAX (916) 464-4645 Schwarzenegger Environmental http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley Governor Protection 18 August 2008 See attached distribution list DELTA REGIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM STAKEHOLDER PANEL KICKOFF MEETING This is an invitation to participate as a stakeholder in the development and implementation of a critical and important project, the Delta Regional Monitoring Program (Delta RMP), being developed jointly by the State and Regional Boards’ Bay-Delta Team. The Delta RMP stakeholder panel kickoff meeting is scheduled for 30 September 2008 and we respectfully request your attendance at the meeting. The meeting will consist of two sessions (see attached draft agenda). During the first session, Water Board staff will provide an overview of the impetus for the Delta RMP and initial planning efforts. The purpose of the first session is to gain management-level stakeholder input and, if possible, endorsement of and commitment to the Delta RMP planning effort. We request that you and your designee attend the first session together. The second session will be a working meeting for the designees to discuss the details of how to proceed with the planning process. A brief discussion of the purpose and background of the project is provided below. In December 2007 and January 2008 the State Water Board, Central Valley Regional Water Board, and San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board (collectively Water Boards) adopted a joint resolution (2007-0079, R5-2007-0161, and R2-2008-0009, respectively) committing the Water Boards to take several actions to protect beneficial uses in the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary (Bay-Delta).
    [Show full text]
  • Down-Select Report for Task 7: the King Island Characterization Well at King Island, San Joaquin County, California
    West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB) Down-Select Report for Task 7: The King Island Characterization Well at King Island, San Joaquin County, California Lead Author: Elizabeth Burton, WESTCARB Technical Advisor, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Contributing Authors: John Henry Beyer, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Niall Mateer, California Institute for Energy & Environment, University of California Larry Myer, Leonardo Technologies, Inc. Robert Trautz, Electric Power Research Institute Jeffrey Wagoner, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Draft DOE Contract No.: DE-FC26-05NT42593 1 Draft 2 Contents 1.0 Definition and Objectives of the Characterization Study ............................................... 6 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 7 3.0 Down-Select Results ....................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Geologic and Geographic Criteria ................................................................................. 10 3.2 Nontechnical/Logistical Criteria .................................................................................... 21 4.0 Scientific Objectives .......................................................................................................... 24 5.0 Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 26 6.0 References ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 CENSUS - CENSUS TRACT REFERENCE MAP: Sacramento County, CA 121.448951W
    38.371223N 38.381801N 121.978996W 2010 CENSUS - CENSUS TRACT REFERENCE MAP: Sacramento County, CA 121.448951W l 96.30 n n 96.35 h h LEGEND C g k Slou p l Elk Grove 22020 i E Rd h nklin S Fra 80 ood r H SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL LABEL STYLE e Hood 34484 v 80 i Union Pacific RR R o Elmira 22146 t Federal American Indian n e L'ANSE RES 1880 m Reservation a r c a S Off-Reservation Trust Land, 7 6 Franklin Blvd Hawaiian Home Land T1880 3 0 1 1 O Oklahoma Tribal Statistical Area, LO T O EN Alaska Native Village Statistical Area, KAW OTSA 5340 Y M Tribal Designated Statistical Area A R Sprock Rd C Union Pacific RR Vacaville 81554 A State American Indian S Franklin 25506 Reservation Tama Res 4125 State Designated Tribal 96.38 84 d R Lumbee STSA 9815 r Statistical Area d e nd R v ll Isla Ri Randa Ston Stone Lk e L k Sn Alaska Native Regional od g NANA ANRC 52120 r Rd Fogg d Corporation h a nt R g s asa s Kestrel Lake Rd Ple u int o S Po l l 113 S o u k g State (or statistically l h E Wilson Rd Wilson Rd equivalent entity) NEW YORK 36 tter S u lo u S g h County (or statistically ERIE 029 0 equivalent entity) 6 1 Courtland 16714 Korn Rd Hwy t s / Minor Civil Division d d R R 1,2 r e (MCD) Bristol town 07485 e Lambert Rd g v d i i H r R B a s h s g S YOLO 113 u o l l o S u g r Consolidated City h e t MILFORD 47500 t u SOLANO 095 S L ev d 5 e R e e R ve 1,3 d e Incorporated Place Vouvray Ln L 5 Davis 18100 Russel Rd Census Designated Place Toe Drn 3 Incline Village 35100 h (CDP) g u o l S Herzog Rd r e Alfalfa Plant Rd t t Census Tract Dierssen Rd gh W Sut u 33.07 u ter Islan S Slo d Cross R Ca che d Dierssen Rd DESCRIPTION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL M i n Water Body e Interstate 3 Pleasant Lake r S lo u Vorden Rd gh Richards U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Certification Framework: Leakage Risk Assessment for Co2 Injection at the Montezuma Hills Site, Solano County, California
    CERTIFICATION FRAMEWORK: LEAKAGE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CO2 INJECTION AT THE MONTEZUMA HILLS SITE, SOLANO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Curtis M. Oldenburg1, Preston Jordan1, Alberto Mazzoldi1, Jeff Wagoner4, Steven L. Bryant2, Jean-Philippe Nicot3 1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2 University of Texas, Austin, 3 Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas, 4 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DOE Contract No.: DE-FC26-05NT42593 Contract Period: October 1, 2005 - May 11, 2011 Certification Framework: Leakage Risk Assessment for CO2 Injection at the Montezuma Hills Site, Solano County, California Curtis M. Oldenburg1, Preston Jordan1, Alberto Mazzoldi1, Jeff Wagoner4, Steven L. Bryant2, Jean-Philippe Nicot3 1Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2CPGE, University of Texas, Austin, 3Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas, 4Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 1 Introduction WESTCARB and C6 Resources are partners in a CO2 injection project in the Montezuma Hills, 80 km (50 mi) northeast of San Francisco, CA. Through a phased process that involves drilling an appraisal well and injecting CO2 on a small-scale, along with thorough analysis of data and modeling of the system, the goal of the project is to assess the deep geologic formations in the area for Geologic Carbon Sequestration (GCS), and if favorable, inject CO2 currently emitted to the atmosphere from nearby refinery facilities at industrial scales on the order of 1 million tons of CO2 per year. The deep geology at the site is considered very favorable for GCS by virtue of the numerous sandstone formations which are potentially capable of storing large amounts of CO2 and which are vertically separated by thick shale formations that prevent CO2 from migrating upward.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Maps of the Sacramento - San Joaquin Delta, California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP MF-1401 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAPS OF THE SACRAMENTO - SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA By Brian F. Atwater INTRODUCTION The Sac ramen to - San Joaquin Delta, the arm of Helley, and W. R. Lettis improved the manuscript with the San Francisco Bay estuary that reaches into the critical reviews, and Faith Dunham, J. R. Le Compte, Central 'valley of California, differs from typical J. B. Pinkerton, N. J. Tamamian, J. A. Thomas, and coastal-plain deltas in three important respects. Natalie Weiskal helped prepare the maps and text for First, rather than meeting the ocean individually and publication. directly, all major waterways of this delta discharge via a single constricted outlet into a chain of estuarine bays and straits. Second, in the most SKETCH OF DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY common vertical sequence of deposits, peat and mud deposited in tidal marshes and swamps (tidal wetlands) The Sacramento - San Joaquin Delta overlies 5-10 directly overlie alluvium or eolian sand, a sequence km of sedimentary deposits. Most of this material, recording a landward spread of tidal environment~ including sources and reservoirs of the Delta's rather than the seaward migration of fluvial natural gas, accumulated in marine environments about environments that is typical of coastal-plain deltas 175 million to 25 million years ago (Burroughs, (Cosby, 1941, p. 43; Thompson, 1957, p. 12; Shlemon 1967). Younger deposits are generally described as and Begg, 1975, p. 259; Atwater and Belknap, 1980). nonmarine (Burroughs, 1967), but some must have formed Finally, intensive human use has led to a peculiar set in shallow seas and estuaries (see maps by C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rooster Tails Fishing Club of Northern California, Inc. Educate ~ Entertain ~ Enhance
    The Rooster Tails Fishing Club of Northern California, Inc. Educate ~ Entertain ~ Enhance Volume 7, Issue 6 — June 2017 Rooster Tails Fishing Club of Northern California, Inc. PO Box 7441 Fishing the Klamath River with Jerry Lampkin Auburn, CA 95604 The multi-talented Rooster Tail Fishing Club The Klamath is special among many rivers in 530-887-0479 member and Pro River Guide, Jerry Lampkin California. It is only second by out-flow to the www.roostertailsfishingclub.org invites all members and their guests to a spe- Sacramento River and flows 263 miles cial presentation at the third Friday breakfast through Oregon and northern California emp- Fishing the meeting on June 16th to share his experi- tying into the Pacific Ocean. It drains an ex- Klamath River for ences on the Klamath River. Jerry has been tensive watershed of almost 16,000 square fishing the Klamath for salmon and steel- miles from both states. salmon and head for over 25 years and brings with him a steelhead unique perspective about the river you will Unlike most rivers, the Klamath begins in the want to hear. Jerry and his wife Sherry will be high desert and flows toward the mountains July 12th— available to fisher men and women inter- carving a path through the rugged Cascade ested in fishing the ‘Springer Salmon Run’ and Klamath mountains before reaching the Rooster Tail Day during the week of July 10 – 14. Jerry has sea. The scenery and wild life are varied and spectacular. The area is a nature lover’s on the Klamath set aside Wednesday, July 12th, as Rooster dream and a panacea for photographers.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Sherman Island Wildlife Area Land Management Plan EDAW California Department of Fish and Game I Table of Contents TABLE of CONTENTS
    LOWER SHERMAN ISLAND WILDLIFE AREA LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL APRIL 2007 iÿPWA EDAW ranr HILLIJVIbJMKWII LOWER SHERMAN ISLAND WILDLIFE AREA LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL PREPARED FOR: CAUFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME SACRAMENTO VALLEY CENTRAL SIERRA REGION 1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SUITE A RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 CONTACT; SARAHDLM AREA MANAGER 916/353-2881 PREPARED BY: EDAW 2022 J STREET SACRAMENTO, CAUFORNIA 95814 CONTACT; JOHN HUNTER 916/414-5800 APRIL 2007 EDAW ig/PWA FINAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE LOWER SHERMAN ISLAND WILDLIFE AREA PREPARED FOR: California Department of Fish and Game Sacramento Valley Central Sierra Region 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 PREPARED BY: EDAW, Inc. 2022 J Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916)414-5800 APPROVED BY: Acting Regional Manager, Bay-Delta Region Date Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... ES-1 Purpose and History of Acquisition ........................................................................................................ES-2 Property Description and Management Setting.......................................................................................ES-2 Environmental Setting.............................................................................................................................ES-2 Management Goals................................................................................................................................ES-13
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento San Joaquin Delta Atlas
    State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA ATLAS August 1987 FOREWORD The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta was originally a tidal marsh formed at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers and Suisun Bay. More than 80 percent of this former marsh was leveed and developed for agriculture from the mid-1800s to the early 1900s. Today the Delta islands and levees are of statewide importance for agriculture, water quality, flood control, recreation, fish and wildlife, water supply, commercial shipping, transportation, and other benefits. This Atlas is the result of information gathered during Department of Water Resources studies on Delta programs and, in particular, the recent studies for Delta levee improvements. The Atlas provides background information that should be helpful for people trying to understand and address complex problems of this estuary. The information is presented in a series of figures, photographs, and tables for easy reference. David N. Kennedy, Director Department of Water Resources The Resources Agency State of California iii CONTENTS FOREWORD iii INTRODUCTION 1 Tables 1 Improvements on Delta Islands 2 2 Emergency Work Expenditures on Nonproject Levees, 1980-1986, Ranked by Total Cost Expended 44 3 Emergency Work Expenditures on Nonproject Levees, 1980-1986, Ranked by Cost per Acre 45 4 Annual Levee Maintenance, 1981-1986, Ranked by Total Cost per Mile 46 5 Delta Statistics 60 Figures 1 Fresh Water Tidelands, 1872 4 2 Delta Waterways, 1987 5 3 Waterways
    [Show full text]