"Questions and Discussion, Part 2" in "Music Librarianship in America, Part 2: Music Librarians and Music Scholarship"

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

"Questions and discussion, part 2" in "Music librarianship in America, Part 2: Music librarians and music scholarship" The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Wolff, Christoph. 1991. "Questions and discussion, part 2" in "Music librarianship in America, Part 2: Music librarians and music scholarship". Harvard Library Bulletin 2 (1), Spring 1991: 70-76. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42661664 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP 70 Questions and Discussion, Part 2 ChristophWolff, Chair WOLFF:Our topic, "Music Librarians and Music Scholarship," is as important as it is sensitive, and it's very good that not just this session but the entire symposium is largely devoted to this central aspect. Aren't we all, in fact, sitting in the same boat? Professional, organizational, even philosophical trends have unfortunately created some boundaries. As Harold Samuel pointed out, fewer and fewer musicologists attend Music Library Association meetings because those meetings have become concerned primarily with technical matters. There is also the arrogant scholar who looks down on the library as a service department. But sitting in the same boat means serving one another in the best possible way. Consider the universal phenomenon of stuff-in-a-box, as Suki Sommer referred to it earlier. There is ample opportunity for hands-on cooperation between librarians and scholars, especially in this area, as two recent examples will demonstrate. In April 1989 I was asked to survey the Philip Spitta estate in the university library ofI,6dz in Poland. The material had been sit- Christoph Wolff is William ting in boxes for forty-six years and had not been accessible to scholarship. I will Powell Mason Professor of not belabor the point here; the discoveries are described in the December 1989 issue Music, Curator of the Isham of Notes.1 Memorial Library, and Acting Closer to home and only one week before this symposium, Peter Wollny, a Director of the University Library at Harvard University. graduate student in musicology at Harvard, telephoned me at home to ask whether He is the author, with Hans- I knew a cantata, "Merk auf, mein Herz." I replied that I didn't, but I had seen a Joachim Schulze, of the multi- reference to it and an incipit of the music. It is listed in Wolfgang Schmieder' s Bach- volume Bach Compendium: Werk- Verzeichnis under Anhang 163. Wollny, who is working on a Wilhelm ana lytisch-b i bl i ograph isches Friedemann Bach project, informed me that the piece, which is identified in the Repertorium der Werke Johann Schmieder catalog and the Bach-Gesellschaft edition as lost, was here at Harvard. SebastianBachs. How did he locate the work, which does not show up in any Harvard catalog? It happened to have been among some stuff-in-a-box. The box contained uncataloged materials that came to the library from George Benson Weston, a Harvard profes- sor ofltalian language and literature, who left his music collection to the Univer- sity in the 1950s. The collection contains very important materials, particularly some related to Wilhelm Friedemann Bach, and therefore W ollny had every reason to take a closer look at the papers. From a pile of late nineteenth-century transcrip- tions he pulled out some eighteenth-century manuscripts, among them a score and a complete set of parts for the eight-part Christmas motet, "Merk auf, mein Herz," by Johann Christoph Bach (1642-1703; figure 1). The manuscripts had never been described because they had not been accessible to scholarly investigation. We established quickly-in fact, in less than five minutes' time-that the copyist was 1 Christoph Wolff, "From Berlin to l.6di: The Spitta Collection Resurfaces," Notes,46 (1989), 3n-327. Questions and Discussion, Part 2 71 Figure 1. First page of Johann Christoph Bach's Merk auf, mein Herz, in a manuscript score by Johann Christoph Altnikol, a copyist for ]. S. Bach. 72 HARVARD LIBRARY BULLETIN Johann Christoph Altnikol,J. S. Bach's principal copyist in the 1740s and later his son-in-law, and that the paper is the same as that used for the second half of the score of Bach's B-minor Mass and for some other Bach pieces. It could then be readily determined that these were performing materials used in Leipzig by the Thomaner Choir in the mid-174os, and that the piece was actually part of the Altbachisches Archiv, a collection of music by Bach's ancestors in which the composer became particularly interested during that time. So, what do we learn from this? Stuff-in-a-box is useful to musicologists only if librarians keep it in the first place, and then only if we know of its existence. At the same time, librarians need scholars to help identify the stuff-in-a-box. We are indeed sitting in the same boat. LEONARDBURKAT (Danbury, Conn.): When I was a librarian at the Boston Public Library, it was common knowledge that Professor Weston had a number of music manuscripts by members of the Bach family, including obscure works, not well cataloged, of Wilhelm Friedemann Bach. I cannot imagine how that box of music from Weston's collection could have gotten into the hands of any librarian in any library who knew anything about Weston without being opened and carefully examined upon receipt, even if the library couldn't afford to process the contents and make them available. I wonder if there is a reason, if not an excuse, that the box just sat there. OcHS: While I don't know the answer, I can guess: this material came to Harvard at a time when there was no music librarian-there were just generallibrarians, and they could not deal with it properly and adequately. This incident proves how urgently we need music librarians in our libraries. PRUETT:Coming from the Library of Congress, I am a bit reluctant to comment on unopened boxes! As I have told many people since joining that institution, the magnitude of the problem is simply enorn1ous: we keep discovering stuff in boxes, not only in the buildings on Capitol Hill, but also in various warehouses that we have. I would, however, make one slight plea to those who discover great trea- sures in boxes, that they temper their reactions and not readily assume that the material discovered has been scandalously neglected by ignorant library staff. Although such may be the case, there are very good reasons in many instances why things have stayed in boxes. ALEJANDROPLANCHART (University of California at Santa Barbara): Since we are continuing our discussion of boxes, I will relate one story from south of the bor- der. In 1925 when the Escuela Superior de Musica in Caracas was being remodeled, a trunk that had been sitting in a space underneath a staircase was moved and opened. The trunk had apparently been sitting there since r 800-the Escuela had been in the same building since the eighteenth century. In that trunk was found what is now the entire surviving corpus ofVenezuelan colonial music, including the Mass of Jose Angel Lamas and all the music we have of Cayetano Carrefio- Masses and motets. It had literally been hidden there, apparently during the War of Independence, by blocking and plastering the stairs. When the plaster was removed during the remodeling, the trunk was found. So there are reasons that things like this happen. Questions and Discussion, Part 2 73 A different issue is the one raised by Professor Slim and exemplified by the loss of this painting for seventy-odd years. We desperately need to encourage auction houses and those who cater to private collectors (who tend to be very secretive) to do very careful cataloging. And unless auction houses and private collectors make materials available to responsible scholarship for a certain amount of time, we will constantly be saddled with the problem of primary source materials remaining improperly identified and inaccessible to scholars. One of the most painful cases involved a private collection that contained the central sources of old Roman chant at Santa Cecilia, to which scholars were denied access with the excuse that the material was about to appear in facsimile. Completion of the facsimile edition took over a quarter of a century. In the meantime, however, thanks to John Connolly, who managed to get a bootleg microfilm, a number of people could have access. One mission of music librarians should be to preach to private collectors on the morality of denying access to crucial information to responsible scholarship. Paul Henry Lang, in a r 9 50s editorial, castigates an unknown New York collector who had refused access to a Mozart autograph for work on the Neue Mozart Ausgabe.2 That sort of practice is still very much with us. It is an area in which music librar- ians, and librarians in general, can have a positive effect in creating a different cul- tural atmosphere. MAURICEPRESS (London): I am not utterly convinced by Leo Balk that publishers have as a real goal getting information to musicologists. Doesn't profit come first? BALK:In planning publishing projects we have to consider their usefulness, and if there is some financial gain to be derived, then they are worth doing. If projects are not well received they aren't done again.
Recommended publications
  • Early Music Review EDITIONS of MUSIC a Study That Is Complex, Detailed and Seems to Me to Reach Pretty Plausible Insights
    Early Music Review EDITIONS OF MUSIC a study that is complex, detailed and seems to me to reach pretty plausible insights. His thesis in brief is ‘that the nativity of Christ is BOOKS represented in the first sonata in G minor while the juxtaposed D minor partita and C major sonata are the Ben Shute: Sei Solo: Symbolum? locus of passion-resurrection imagery.’ He acknowledges The Theology of J. S. Bach’s solo violin works that there have been both numerological and emotion- Pickwick Publications, Eugene, Oregon based interpretations in these areas, but none relying ISBN 978-1-4982-3941-7 on firm musicological bases. These he begins to lay out, xxvii+267pp, $28.00 undergirding his research with a sketch of the shift from thinking of music as en expression of the divine wisdom, his is not the first monograph to employ a variety an essentially Aristotelian absolute, towards music as a of disciplines to delve beneath the surface of a more subjective expression of human feeling, revealing the Tgroup of surviving compositions by Bach in the drama and rhetoric of the ‘seconda prattica.’ In Germany hope of finding a hidden key to their understanding and these two traditions – ratio and sensus – remained side by interpretation: nor will it be the last. But what is unusual side until the 18th century, and the struggle to balance the about Benjamin Shute is that he does not go overboard two is evident in Bach’s work. So stand-alone instrumental for the one-and-only solution, instead adopting a multi- music has a theological proclamation in its conviction faceted approach to unearthing the composer’s intentions.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Copyright © Thomas Braatz, 20071 Introduction This paper proposes to trace the origin and rather quick demise of the Andreas Stübel Theory, a theory which purportedly attempted to designate a librettist who supplied Johann Sebastian Bach with texts and worked with him when the latter composed the greater portion of the 2nd ‘chorale-cantata’ cycle in Leipzig from 1724 to early 1725. It was Hans- Joachim Schulze who first proposed this theory in 1998 after which it encountered a mixed reception with Christoph Wolff lending it some support in his Bach biography2 and in his notes for the Koopman Bach-Cantata recording series3, but with Martin Geck4 viewing it rather less enthusiastically as a theory that resembled a ball thrown onto the roulette wheel and having the same chance of winning a jackpot. 1 This document may be freely copied and distributed providing that distribution is made in full and the author’s copyright notice is retained. 2 Christoph Wolff, Johann Sebastian Bach: The Learned Musician (Norton, 2000), (first published as a paperback in 2001), p. 278. 3 Christoph Wolff, ‘The Leipzig church cantatas: the chorale cantata cycle (II:1724-1725)’ in The Complete Cantatas volumes 10 and 11 as recorded by Ton Koopman and published by Erato Disques (Paris, France, 2001). 4 Martin Geck, Bach: Leben und Werk, (Hamburg, 2000), p. 400. 1 Andreas Stübel Andreas Stübel (also known as Stiefel = ‘boot’) was born as the son of an innkeeper in Dresden on December 15, 1653. In Dresden he first attended the Latin School located there. Then, in 1668, he attended the Prince’s School (“Fürstenschule”) in Meißen.
    [Show full text]
  • MTO 19.3: Brody, Review of Matthew Dirst, Engaging Bach
    Volume 19, Number 3, September 2013 Copyright © 2013 Society for Music Theory Review of Matthew Dirst, Engaging Bach: The Keyboard Legacy from Marpurg to Mendelssohn (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Christopher Brody KEYWORDS: Bach, Bach reception, Mozart, fugue, chorale, Well-Tempered Clavier Received July 2013 [1] Historical research on Johann Sebastian Bach entered its modern era in the late 1950s with the development, spearheaded by Alfred Dürr, Georg von Dadelsen, and Wisso Weiss, of the so-called “new chronology” of his works.(1) In parallel with this revolution, the history of the dissemination and reception of Bach was also being rewritten. Whereas Hans T. David and Arthur Mendel wrote, in 1945, that “Bach and his works ... [were] practically forgotten by the generations following his” (358), by 1998 Christoph Wolff could describe the far more nuanced understanding of Bach reception that had arisen in the intervening years in terms of “two complementary aspects”: on the one hand, the beginning of a more broadly based public reception of Bach’s music in the early nineteenth century, for which Mendelssohn’s 1829 performance of the St. Matthew Passion represents a decisive milestone; on the other hand, the uninterrupted reception of a more private kind, largely confined to circles of professional musicians, who regarded Bach’s fugues and chorales in particular as a continuing challenge, a source of inspiration, and a yardstick for measuring compositional quality. (485–86) [2] In most respects it is with the latter (though chronologically earlier) aspect that Matthew Dirst’s survey Engaging Bach: The Keyboard Legacy from Marpurg to Mendelssohn concerns itself, serving as a fine single-volume introduction to the “private” side of Bach reception up to about 1850.
    [Show full text]
  • Motetten Und Orchesterwerke Der Familie Bach Die Familie Bach Von Angela Gehann-Dernbach
    Einführung – Motetten und Orchesterwerke der Familie Bach Die Familie Bach von Angela Gehann-Dernbach Die Familie Bach war ein weit verzweigtes Musikergeschlecht, aus dem von der zweiten Hälfte des 16. Jahrhunderts bis zur Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts in Mitteldeutschland zahlreiche Stadtmusiker, Organisten und Komponisten entstammten. Man unterscheidet für diese Künstlerfamilie die beiden Hauptlinien: Erfurter Linie Arnstädter Linie Die Familie Bach beherrschte in Erfurt über ein ganzes Jahrhundert das musikalische Leben derart, dass noch 1793 alle Stadtpfeifer „Bache“ genannt wurden, obwohl längst keiner dieses Namens mehr unter ihnen lebte. Der erste Musiker dieser Familie war Hans Bach (1580-1626), der Urgroßvater von Johann Sebastian Bach, der zwar das Handwerk des Bäckers gelernt hat, jedoch als Spielmann zwischen Gotha, Eisenach und Arnstadt seinen Lebensunterhalt verdient hat und auch von weiter außerhalb geholt wurde. Johann Bach (1604-1673) ist der älteste als Komponist beglaubigte Vertreter der Musikerfamilie Bach und ältester Sohn von Hans Bach. Er gilt als der Begründer der Erfurter Linie der Familie und war ein Großonkel von Johann Sebastian Bach. Er arbeitet als Spielmann in verschiedenen thüringischen Städten, übernimmt dann die Stadtpfeiferstelle in Suhl und wird Organist in Arnstadt und ab 1628 in Schweinfurt. 1634 wird er in Wechmar Organist und 1635 Direktor der Erfurter Ratsmusik. Christoph Bach (1613-1661) war der zweite Sohn von Hans Bach sowie Großvater von Johann Sebastian Bach. Nach seinen musikalischen Ausbildungsjahren – sicher zunächst beim Vater und möglicherweise auch beim Suhler Stadtpfeifer Hoffmann – ist er um 1633 wieder in Wechmar als Stadtmusikant und „fürstlicher Bedienter“. Christoph Bach war von 1642 bis 1652 Ratsmusikant in Erfurt. 1654 ging er nach Arnstadt als „gräflicher Hof- und Stadtmusikus“.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into J.S. Bach's Method of Reworking in His Composition of the Concerto for Keyboard, Flute and Violin, Bwv 1044, and Its
    INQUIRY INTO J.S. BACH'S METHOD OF REWORKING IN HIS COMPOSITION OF THE CONCERTO FOR KEYBOARD, FLUTE AND VIOLIN, BWV 1044, AND ITS CHRONOLOGY by DAVID JAMES DOUGLAS B.A., The University of British Columbia, 1994 A THESIS IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES School of Music We accept this thesis as conforming tjjfe required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA October 1997 © David James Douglas, 1997 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of ZH t/S fC The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date . DE-6 (2788) Abstract Bach's Concerto for Keyboard, Flute, and Violin with Orchestra in A minor, BWV 1044, is a very interesting and unprecedented case of Bach reworking pre-existing keyboard works into three concerto movements. There are several examples of Bach carrying out the reverse process with his keyboard arrangements of Vivaldi, and other composers' concertos, but the reworking of the Prelude and Fugue in A minor, BWV 894, into the outer movements of BWV 1044, and the second movement of the Organ Sonata in F major, BWV 527, into the middle movement, appears to be unique among Bach's compositional activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalbaßlehre of 1738” by Thomas Braatz © 2012
    The Problematical Origins of the “Generalbaßlehre of 1738” by Thomas Braatz © 2012 Near the end of 2011 a new volume of the NBA was released by Bärenreiter. It is called a supplement and includes notes and studies on thorough-bass, composition and counterpoint along with a section of Bach’s sketches and drafts and finally in the appendix the more recently discovered aria, BWV 1127. In addition to the well- researched and documented rules on thorough-bass found in the Anna Magdalena Bach’s notebooks, there is a presentation and critical discussion of the recently discovered (1999) counterpoint studies in the form of an exchange between Wilhelm Friedemann Bach and his father, all in autograph documents from the period 1736 to1739 when W. F. Bach was an organist in Dresden. Of great interest is the analysis and discussion of the Precepts and Principles for Playing the Thorough-Bass along with the complete text and musical examples. Below I will present the original German (Appendix 1) along with my English translation (Appendix 2) of the pertinent sections from the NBA editor’s introduction and the critical report covering this document. From this the reader will be able ascertain the spurious1 nature of its origin and claims of authenticity. The Precepts and Principles for Playing Four-Part Thorough-Bass or Accompaniment, or more commonly referred to in its short form as the “Generalbaßlehre of 1738”, has attained a false aura of authenticity since the appearance of Philipp Spitta’s monumental Bach biography in which Spitta printed the entire text of this document that he also analyzed and discussed in greater detail in a music journal in 1882.2 Spitta was the first Bach scholar to recognize the connection between this document and certain paragraphs contained in a treatise by Friedrich Erhard Niedt.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking J.S. Bach's Musical Offering
    Rethinking J.S. Bach’s Musical Offering Rethinking J.S. Bach’s Musical Offering By Anatoly Milka Translated from Russian by Marina Ritzarev Rethinking J.S. Bach’s Musical Offering By Anatoly Milka Translated from Russian by Marina Ritzarev This book first published 2019 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2019 by Anatoly Milka All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-3706-4 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-3706-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures........................................................................................... vii List of Schemes ....................................................................................... viii List of Music Examples .............................................................................. x List of Tables ............................................................................................ xii List of Abbreviations ............................................................................... xiii Preface ...................................................................................................... xv Introduction ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The American Bach Society the Westfield Center
    The Eastman School of Music is grateful to our festival sponsors: The American Bach Society • The Westfield Center Christ Church • Memorial Art Gallery • Sacred Heart Cathedral • Third Presbyterian Church • Rochester Chapter of the American Guild of Organists • Encore Music Creations The American Bach Society The American Bach Society was founded in 1972 to support the study, performance, and appreciation of the music of Johann Sebastian Bach in the United States and Canada. The ABS produces Bach Notes and Bach Perspectives, sponsors a biennial meeting and conference, and offers grants and prizes for research on Bach. For more information about the Society, please visit www.americanbachsociety.org. The Westfield Center The Westfield Center was founded in 1979 by Lynn Edwards and Edward Pepe to fill a need for information about keyboard performance practice and instrument building in historical styles. In pursuing its mission to promote the study and appreciation of the organ and other keyboard instruments, the Westfield Center has become a vital public advocate for keyboard instruments and music. By bringing together professionals and an increasingly diverse music audience, the Center has inspired collaborations among organizations nationally and internationally. In 1999 Roger Sherman became Executive Director and developed several new projects for the Westfield Center, including a radio program, The Organ Loft, which is heard by 30,000 listeners in the Pacific 2 Northwest; and a Westfield Concert Scholar program that promotes young keyboard artists with awareness of historical keyboard performance practice through mentorship and concert opportunities. In addition to these programs, the Westfield Center sponsors an annual conference about significant topics in keyboard performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Autoren Der Beiträge
    Die Autoren der Beiträge Objekttyp: Index Zeitschrift: Basler Jahrbuch für historische Musikpraxis : eine Veröffentlichung der Schola Cantorum Basiliensis, Lehr- und Forschungsinstitut für Alte Musik an der Musik-Akademie der Stadt Basel Band (Jahr): 22 (1998) PDF erstellt am: 02.10.2021 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Die Autoren 221 Die Autoren der Beiträge Michael Belotti (geb. 1957 in Tettnang/Württ.) studierte Kirchenmusik, Musiktheorie und Musikwissenschaft in Freiburg/Br. und promovierte 1993 bei Christoph Wolff mit einer quellen- und stilkritischen Untersuchung zu Buxtehudes Orgelmusik. Er ist Mitarbeiter an der Buxtehude-Gesamtausgabe (die Edition der freien Orgelwerke erschien 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • 75Thary 1935 - 2010
    ANNIVERS75thARY 1935 - 2010 Bach Festival of Winter Park The Mission of the Bach Festival Society of Winter Park, Inc. is to enrich the Central Florida community through presentation of exceptionally high-quality performances of the finest classical music in the repertoire, with special emphasis on oratorio and large choral works, world-class visiting artists, and the sacred and secular music of Johann Sebastian Bach and his contemporaries in the High Baroque and Early Classical periods. This Mission shall be achieved through presentation of: • the Annual Bach Festival, • the Visiting Artists Series, and • the Choral Masterworks Series. In addition, the Bach Festival Society of Winter Park, Inc. shall present a variety of educational and community outreach programs to encourage youth participation in music at all levels, to provide access to constituencies with special needs, and to participate with the community in celebrations or memorials at times of significant special occasions. Adopted by a Resolution of the Bach Festival Society Board of Trustees The Bach Festival Society of Winter Park, Inc. is a private non-profit foundation as defined under Section 509(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code and is exempt from federal income taxes under IRC Section 501(c)(3). Gifts and contributions are deductible for federal income tax purposes as provided by law. A copy of the Bach Festival Society official registration (CH 1655) and financial information may be obtained from the Florida Division of Consumer Services by calling toll-free 1-800-435-7352 within the State. Registration does not imply endorsement, approval, or recommendation by the State.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bach Family There Has Never Been a Dynasty Like It! We Have
    The Bach Family There has never been a dynasty like it! We have Johann Sebastian Bach to thank for much of the Genealogy as well. In the region of Thuringia, the name of Bach was synonymous with music, but they were also a 'family' experiencing the ups and downs of 17th & 18th century life, from happy marriages and joyful family music-making in this devoutly Lutheran community to coping with infant mortality and dysfunctional behaviour. The Bach Family encountered the lot. In this page, we visit the lives of key members of this remarkable family, a family that was humble in its intent, served the community, were appropriately deferential to their various patrons or princes, and whose music lives on through our performances today. Joh. Seb. Bach's ancestors set the tone and musical direction, but this particular family member raised the bar higher in scale and invention. Sebastian taught his own sons too, plus many of the offspring of his relatives. His eldest sons Wilhelm Friedemann and Carl Philipp Emanuel certainly held their Father in high regard, but also wanted to plough their own furrow - not easy even then. Others either held church or court positions and one travelled first to Italy and then to Georgian London in order to ply his trade - Johann Christian Bach, the youngest son. The family's ancestry goes back to the late 16th/early 17th centuries to a certain Vitus (Veit) Bach (d.1619) who left his native Hungary and came to live in Wechmar, near Gotha in Thuringia. He was a baker by trade.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Early Years, 1685–1703
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-13925-1 — Bach Peter Williams Excerpt More Information – 1 Early years, 1685 1703: background, family, studies The Obituary is headed ‘the Honourable Johann Sebastian Bach, world- famous in organ-playing, Royal Polish and Electoral Saxon Court Com- poser and Music Director in Leipzig’, and begins Johann Sebastian Bach belongs to a family in all of whose members equally a love for and skill in music seem, as a common gift, to have been imparted by nature. Emanuel Bach, presumably responsible for these words, was familiar with the outlines of his family’s musical history, since quite apart from any anecdotes about it that circulated in the family, his father had spent time around the age of fifty compiling on paper a selective genealogy. This is the ‘Origin of the musical-Bach family’, Ursprung der musicalisch-Bachischen Familie (Dok. I, pp. 255–61), a Genealogy known to Emanuel in whose household it was later copied: a unique source of information about the family tree and, in the sparseness of other evidence, used ever since in all kinds of connections. This is a document, often since referred to as a ‘table’, into which something can be read about the composer, his interests, his industry, even now and then his opinions. Although for reasons that can only be guessed Bach contributed little to the published biographies and autobiographies of the day, he did compile a genealogical list either from scratch after many time-consuming enquiries or, more likely, by revising and enlarging an older document begun by a previous member of this large family.
    [Show full text]