PCT Gazette, Special Issue No. 2, 2001

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PCT Gazette, Special Issue No. 2, 2001 12 July 2001 S-02/2001 (E) PCT GAZETTE SPECIAL ISSUE General Information (Contracting States, National and Regional Offices, International Authorities) CONTENTS Page Section IV Notices and Information of a General Character Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Index to Annexes......................................................................................................................................... 3 ANNEX A List of Contracting States ..................................................................................................... 6 ANNEX B1 Information on Contracting States ....................................................................................... 8 ANNEX B2 Information on Intergovernmental Organizations ................................................................ 200 ANNEX C Receiving Offices ................................................................................................................. 210 ANNEX D International Searching Authorities ...................................................................................... 305 ANNEX E International Preliminary Examining Authorities ................................................................. 316 ANNEX L Deposits of Microorganisms and Other Biologicial Material: Requirements of Designated and Elected Offices ........................................................... 326 List of Depositary Institutions ........................................................................................ 341 SUMMARY Designated (or Elected) Offices ........................................................................................... 344 © WIPO 2001 ISSN 0250-7757 S-02/2001 (E) 2 PCT Gazette – Section IV 12 July 2001 SECTION IV NOTICES AND INFORMATION OF A GENERAL CHARACTER _________________________________________________________ Introduction This Special Issue of the PCT Gazette compiles the essence of various notifications under the PCT received from the PCT Contracting States, from the PCT Authorities and from national Offices, as well as general information on those States, Authorities and Offices. It replaces the issue published on January 4, 2001 (PCT Gazette No. S-01/2001 (E)) and includes all information published after that date in Section IV of the PCT Gazette. The information concerning the international phase of the PCT procedure is presented in several parts called “ANNEXES” (Annexes A, B1, B2, C, D, E and L). Those parts are identical to the corresponding Annexes of the PCT Applicant’s Guide, Volume I, bearing the same letter. Therefore, the denomination “Annex” has been maintained for the publication in this Special Issue of the PCT Gazette since it has the advantage of uniformity of presentation of information in both the PCT Gazette and the Guide. This will facilitate the retrieval of information for the reader of both publications. The information concerning the national phase is presented in the last part of this issue of the PCT Gazette, called “SUMMARY.” For the reasons indicated above with respect to the Annexes, the “Summary” sheets are identical to the sheets with the same denomination contained in Volume II of the PCT Applicant’s Guide. They give, in summarized form, information on the requirements to be complied with by the applicant upon entry into the national phase before each designated (or elected) Office. Each of Annexes B1, B2, C, D and E as well as the “Summary” part is subdivided according to the alphabetical order of the two-letter country codes. The code used for a Contracting State is also used for the national Office of that State in its capacity as receiving Office, International Searching Authority, International Preliminary Examining Authority and designated (or elected) Office. The two-letter code for each Contracting State is indicated in the index which follows and in Annex A. For intergovernmental organizations, the following codes are used: “AP” for the African Regional Industrial Property Organization, “EA” for the Eurasian Patent Organization, “EP” for the European Patent Organisation, “OA” for the African Intellectual Property Organization and “IB” for the International Bureau of WIPO. Any reference to “Volume I” or to “Volume II” in the Annexes or in the “Summary” sheets is a reference to Volume I or Volume II, respectively, of the PCT Applicant’s Guide. S-02/2001 (E) 12 July 2001 PCT Gazette – Section IV 3 INDEX TO ANNEXES Contracting State or ANNEX B ANNEX C ANNEX D ANNEX E ANNEX L SUMMARY Intergovernmental Information on Receiving International International Deposits of National Phase Organization Contracting States Offices Searching Preliminary Micro- in Designated (B1) and Authorities Examining organisms and (or Elected) Intergovernmental Authorities Other Offices Organizations (B2) Biological Material Code Name Page Page Page Page Page Page United Arab AE 8 210 – – 326 344 Emirates AL Albania 10 211 – – – 345 AM Armenia 12 212 305 316 326 347 AT Austria 14 214 306 317 326 349 AU Australia 16 216 – – – 350 AZ Azerbaijan 18 218 – – – 351 Bosnia and BA 20 219 – – – 352 Herzegovina BBBarbados22––––353 BE Belgium 24 220 – – – – BFBurkina Faso26–––– – BG Bulgaria 27 221 – – 327 354 BJBenin29–––– – BR Brazil 30 222 – – – 356 BY Belarus 32 224 – – – 358 BZ Belize 34 225 – – – 360 CA Canada 36 226 – – 327 361 CF Centr. Afric.CFCentr.Rep.38–––– – CGCongo39–––– – CH Switzerland 40 227 – – 336 363 CICôte d’Ivoire42–––– – CMCameroon43–––– – CN China 44 228 307 318 327 365 CR Costa Rica 46 229 – – – 367 CU Cuba 48 230 – – 328 368 CY Cyprus 50 231 – – – – CZ Czech Republic 51 232 – – 328 370 DE Germany 53 234 – – 329 372 DK Denmark 55 235 – – 328 374 DZ Algeria 57 236 – – – 376 EE Estonia 59 238 – – – 379 ES Spain 61 241 310 – 336 383 FI Finland 63 242 – – 329 384 FR France 65 243 – – – – GAGabon67–––– – GB United Kingdom 68 244 – – 338 386 GE Georgia 70 246 – – 329 388 [Continued on next page] S-02/2001 (E) 4 PCT Gazette – Section IV 12 July 2001 INDEX TO ANNEXES [Cont’d] Contracting State or ANNEX B ANNEX C ANNEX D ANNEX E ANNEX L SUMMARY Intergovernmental Information on Receiving International International Deposits of National Phase Organization Contracting States Offices Searching Preliminary Micro- in Designated (B1) and Authorities Examining organisms and (or Elected) Intergovernmental Authorities Other Offices Organizations (B2) Biological Material Code Name Page Page Page Page Page Page GH Ghana 72 246 – – – 390 GMGambia74––––392 GNGuinea76–––– – GR Greece 77 248 – – – – GWGuinea-Bissau79–––– – HR Croatia 80 249 – – 328 – HU Hungary 82 250 – – 330 393 ID Indonesia 84 254 – – 330 394 IE Ireland 86 255 – – – – IL Israel 87 256 – – 331 396 IN India 89 258 – – – 397 IS Iceland 91 260 – – 330 398 IT Italy 93 261 – – – – JP Japan 95 263 311 321 331 400 KE Kenya 97 264 – – 331 402 KG Kyrgyzstan 99 265 – – – 403 KP D.P.R. Korea 101 266 – – – 404 KR Rep. of Korea 103 267 312 322 334 406 KZ Kazakhstan 105 268 – – 331 408 LCSaint Lucia107–––– – LILiechtenstein109–––– – LKSri Lanka111––––409 LR Liberia 113 269 – – – 410 LS Lesotho 115 270 – – – 411 LT Lithuania 117 271 – – 332 412 LU Luxembourg 119 272 – – 332 413 LV Latvia 121 273 – – 332 414 MA Morocco 123 274 – – – 415 MC Monaco 125 275 – – – – MD Rep. of Moldova 127 276 – – 334 417 MGMadagascar129––––418 The form. Yugoslav MK 131 277 – – 337 420 Rep. Macedonia MLMali133–––– – MN Mongolia 134 278 – – – 422 MRMauritania136–––– – MW Malawi 137 279 – – – 423 MX Mexico 139 280 – – 332 424 [Continued on next page] S-02/2001 (E) 12 July 2001 PCT Gazette – Section IV 5 INDEX TO ANNEXES [Cont’d] Contracting State or ANNEX B ANNEX C ANNEX D ANNEX E ANNEX L SUMMARY Intergovernmental Information on Receiving International International Deposits of National Phase Organization Contracting States Offices Searching Preliminary Micro- in Designated (B1) and Authorities Examining organisms and (or Elected) Intergovernmental Authorities Other Offices Organizations (B2) Biological Material Code Name Page Page Page Page Page Page MZMozambique141––––426 NENiger143–––– – NL Netherlands 144 281 – – – – NO Norway 146 282 – – 333 427 NZ New Zealand 148 283 – – – 429 PL Poland 150 284 – – 333 433 PT Portugal 152 285 – – 333 434 RO Romania 154 286 – – 334 435 RU Russian Federation 156 287 313 323 334 437 SD Sudan 158 288 – – – 438 SE Sweden 160 290 314 324 336 439 SG Singapore 162 291 – – 335 441 SI Slovenia 164 292 – – 335 443 SK Slovakia 166 293 – – 335 444 SLSierra Leone168––––445 SNSenegal170–––– – SZSwaziland171–––– – TDChad172–––– – TGTogo173–––– – TJ Tajikistan 174 294 – – 337 446 TM Turkmenistan 176 295 – – 338 448 TR Turkey 178 296 – – 337 449 Trinidad and TT 180 297 – – – 451 Tobago United Republic TZ 182–––– – of Tanzania UA Ukraine 184 298 – – 338 452 UGUganda186––––453 US U.S. of America 188 299 315 325 339 454 UZ Uzbekistan 190 300 – – – 457 VN Viet Nam 192 301 – – – 459 YU Yugoslavia 194 302 – – 339 461 ZA South Africa 196 303 – – 335 463 ZW Zimbabwe 198 304 – – – 464 AP ARIPO 200 213 – – 339 348 EA EAPO 202 237 – – 340 378 EP EPO 204 239 308 319 340 381 IB WIPO 206 251 – – – – OAOAPI208––––431 S-02/2001 (E) 6PCT PCT Applicant’s Gazette Guide - Section – Volume IV - Annex I – Annex A A 12 July 2001 A PCT Contracting States* A Name of State Date on which State Name of State Date on which State followed by became bound followed by became bound country code by the PCT* country code by the PCT* Albania AL ......................
Recommended publications
  • License Agreement for Panasonic Mobile Softphone
    Either of the following agreements shall apply depending on the user’s residence. Refer and agree to the applicable agreement. (1) END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT For the users located anywhere other than the countries listed in the (2) “Mobile Application End-User Licence Agreement for European Residents”. (2) Mobile Application End-User Licence Agreement for European Residents For the users in Austria, Bulgaria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, Turkey or Republic of Ireland. (1) END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT IMPORTANT-READ CAREFULLY: This End User License Agreement (“Agreement”) is a legal agreement between you (either as a natural or legal person) and Panasonic Corporation (hereinafter called the “Company") for use of the mobile softphone software (“SOFTWARE”). By accepting the terms and conditions of this Agreement and installing the Software or exercising your rights to make and use copies of the SOFTWARE (as may be provided for below), you agree to be bound by terms of this Agreement. If you do not agree to the terms of this Agreement, do not accept these terms and conditions and delete the SOFTWARE. For the limited warranty pertaining to your jurisdiction, please refer to the section LIMITED WARRANTY. You represent that you have full power, capacity and authority to enter into and accept the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If you are accepting on behalf of your employer, company or another entity, you warrant and represent that you have full legal authority to bind your employer, company or such entity to this Agreement, or that a person with such authority has accepted the terms and conditions of this Agreement prior to using the SOFTWARE as described in this paragraph.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Committee on the Law of Patents
    E SCP/ 20 /3 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: NOVEMBER 15 , 201 3 Standing Committee on the Law of Patents Twentieth Session Geneva, January 27 to 31, 2014 EXCEPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS TO PATENT RIGHTS: PRIVATE AND/OR NON-COMMERCIAL USE Document prepared by the Secretariat INTRODUCTION 1. At its nineteenth session, held from February 25 to 28, 2013, the Standing Committee on the Law of Patents (SCP) agreed that, in relation to the topic “exceptions and limitations to patent rights”, the Secretariat would prepare, inter alia , a document, based on input received from Member States, on how the following five exceptions and limitations were implemented in Member States, without evaluating the effectiveness of those exceptions and limitations: private and/or non-commercial use; experimental use and/or scientific research; preparation of medicines; prior use; use of articles on foreign vessels, aircrafts and land vehicles. The document should also cover practical challenges encountered by Member States in implementing them. 2. Pursuant to the above decision, the Secretariat invited Member States and Reg ional Patent Offices, through Note C.8076, to submit information to the Internat ional Bureau add itional to , or updat ing, the information contained in their responses to the questionnaire on exceptions and limitations to patent rights on the above five exceptions and limitations. In addition, Member States and Regional Patent Offices which had not yet submitted their responses to the quest ionnaire were inv ited to do so . 3. Accordingly, this document provides information on how exceptions and limitations regarding private and/or non-commercial use have been implemented in Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development
    IUFRO Division 6: Social, Economic, Information and Policy Sciences Research Group 6.13.00: Forest Law and Environmental Legislation Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development Proceedings of the 11 th International Symposium Zvolen, Slovakia Editors Rastislav Šulek, Peter Herbst and Franz Schmithüsen Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Economics and Management Technical University in Zvolen 2010 IMPRESSUM Rastislav Šulek, Peter Herbst, Franz Schmithüsen (Editors) Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development Proceedings of the 11 th International Symposium, Zvolen, Slovakia The authors are fully responsible for the content of their articles included in the proceedings Published by: Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Economics and Management, Technical University in Zvolen, Slovak Republic Layout and design by: Rastislav Šulek Copy Right: Editors and Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen ISBN: 978-80-228-2210-7 2 PREFACE 6.13.00 - the forest law and environmental legislation research group in IUFRO (International Union of Forest Research Organizations (cf. www.iufro.org)) has been operating world-wide over decades now. Main emphasis has been on documentation, dissemination and critical analysis of developments in forest law and environmental legislation, foremost in Central and Eastern European countries, not only, but in particular such with economies in transition. This within the unit's general and foremost objective, i. e. to foster exchange of information amongst researchers and practitioners active in the domain of forest law and environmental legislation, and to permanently review the state of the subject, thereby setting priorities concerning research and practice. A number of publications have been produced, proving how this unit meets its high standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2. Initiatives for the Adoption of the Special Law on Religion – History, Political Contexts, and Critics
    Chapter 2. Initiatives for the adoption of the Special Law on Religion – History, Political Contexts, and Critics Research objectives and methodology In recent years, discussions concerning the adoption of a special law on religion and religious organizations have been activated in public and political fields. Since 2014, this initiative is openly supported by the State Agency on Religious Affairs (hereinafter “SARI) which operates under the Prime Minister apparatus. This issue was also actively discussed by the Human Rights and Civic Integration Committee of the Parliament in 2018-2019 within the working group on the issues of religious freedom. It should be mentioned that, the adoption of the special law on religion is part of the political agenda since the 90s and was subject to political discussions in various periods. In all cases, initiatives for the adoption of such law was taken by the lobbyists of dominant religious organization and conservative groups and revealed interests of hierarchizing and controlling of religious organizations. However, as adoption of special law creates high risks of interference in religious freedom, of hierarchizing religious organizations and discrimination of small religious groups, initiatives were always followed by the strong criticism from civil and religious organizations. It is noteworthy, that none of the authoritative international organizations which have a mandate of monitoring and protection of religious freedom in member states, recommended the adoption of such law. The below document studies international practice related to the laws on religious organizations in light of the international standards of freedom of religion. The given chapter of the report reviews and analysis special laws on freedom of religion and religious organizations in Europe and Post-Soviet states and examines them within the international standards of freedom of religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Pct/S/2003/3
    3 July 2003 S-03/2003 (E) PCT GAZETTE SPECIAL ISSUE General Information (Contracting States, National and Regional Offices, International Authorities) CONTENTS Page Section IV Notices and Information of a General Character Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Index to Annexes......................................................................................................................................... 3 ANNEX A List of Contracting States ..................................................................................................... 8 ANNEX B1 Information on Contracting States ....................................................................................... 10 ANNEX B2 Information on Intergovernmental Organizations ................................................................ 221 ANNEX C Receiving Offices ................................................................................................................. 231 ANNEX D International Searching Authorities ...................................................................................... 342 ANNEX E International Preliminary Examining Authorities ................................................................. 353 ANNEX L Deposits of Microorganisms and Other Biologicial Material: Requirements of Designated and Elected Offices ........................................................... 363 List of Depositary Institutions .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transfer Pricing in V4 Countries (PDF Format)
    Transfer Pricing in V4Countries Karel Brychta Michal Ištok Aleksandra Sulik-Górecka Veronika Poreisz Transfer Pricing in V4 Countries Karel Brychta Michal Ištok Aleksandra Sulik-Górecka Veronika Poreisz Reviewers Ing. Veronika Solilová, Ph.D. (Czech Republic) prof. Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala, Ph.D. (Poland) Acknowledgement This scientific monography is a part of the project Transfer Pricing in V4 Countries which was co-financed by the Governments of Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia through Visegrad Grants from International Visegrad Fund. The mission of the fund is to advance ideas for sustainable regional cooperation in Central Europe. © Karel Brychta, Michal Ištok, Aleksandra Sulik-Górecka, Veronika Poreisz 2020 Cover © Jan Janák 2020 © VUTIUM 2020 ISBN 978-80-214-5873-4 Karel Brychta, Michal Ištok, Aleksandra Sulik-Górecka, Veronika Poreisz Transfer Pricing in V4 Countries Lektorovali / Rewievers Ing. Veronika Solilová, Ph.D., prof. Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala, Ph.D. V roce 2020 vydalo Nakladatelství VUTIUM Vysokého učení technického v Brně / Published by VUTIUM Press of Brno University of Technology in 2020 www.vutbr.cz/vutium Obálku navrhl / Cover by Jan Janák Elektronické formáty zpracoval / Electronic formats processed by Michal Kaláb První vydání / First edition Vydáno v režimu open access / Released in open access mode This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCo- mmercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). htt- ps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13164/9788021458734 ISBN 978-80-214-5873-4 PREFACE In recent years transfer pricing has been one of the major topics of international tax discourse. Again, this was well demonstrated by the outcomes of the OECD BEPS Project, for which transfer pricing became one of the building blocks in combatting base erosion and profit shifting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evidentiary Effects of Authentic Acts in the Member States of the European Union, in the Context of Successions
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS LEGAL AFFAIRS The evidentiary effects of authentic acts in the Member States of the European Union, in the context of successions STUDY Abstract The EU Succession Regulation (Regulation 650/2012) allows for cross-border circulation of authentic instruments in a matter of succession. Authentic instruments are documents created by authorised authorities which benefit from certain evidential advantages. As this Regulation does not harmonise Member State substantive laws or procedures concerning succession the laws relating to the domestic evidentiary effects of succession authentic instruments remain diverse. Article 59 of the Succession Regulation requires the Member States party to the Regulation to give succession authentic instruments the evidentiary effects they would enjoy in their Member State of origin. The only limits on this obligation being public policy or the irreconcilability of the authentic instrument with a court decision, court settlement or another authentic instrument. This study, which was commissioned by the Policy Department for Citizen's Rights and Constitutional Affairs of the European Parliament upon request of the Committee on Legal Affairs, provides an information resource for legal practitioners concerning the evidentiary effects of succession authentic instruments in the 25 Member States bound by the Succession Regulation. It also makes recommendations for best practice. PE 556.935 EN ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This research paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs and commissioned, supervised and published by the Policy Department for Citizen's Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Policy departments provide independent expertise, both in-house and externally, to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU external and internal policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyrozumska Transnational Jud
    Anna Wyrozumska – University of Łódź, Faculty of Law and Administration Department of European Constitutional Law, 90-232 Łódź, 8/12 Kopcińskiego St. INITIATING EDITOR Monika Borowczyk REVIEWER Bartłomiej Krzan LINGUISTIC EDITOR Karolina Podstawa PROOFREADING Aneta Tkaczyk TYPESETTING AGENT PR TECHNICAL EDITOR Leonora Wojciechowska COVER DESIGN Stämpfli Polska Sp. z o.o. Cover Image: © Shutterstock.com The monograph is a result of the project nr 10-ECRP-028 International Law through the National Prism: the Impact of Judicial Dialogue The research is based on laws being in force on nd2 August 2016 Publication distributed free of charge © Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017 © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017 Published by Łódź University Press First edition. W.07527.16.0.K ISBN 978-83-8088-707-7 e-ISBN 978-83-8088-708-4 Publisher’s sheets 36.0; printing sheets 31.5 Łódź University Press 90-131 Łódź, 8 Lindleya St. www.wydawnictwo.uni.lodz.pl e-mail: [email protected] tel. (42) 665 58 63 Table of contents Introduction 11 Anna Wyrozumska I. The Central and Eastern European Judiciary and Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law 15 1. Judicial Dialogue as a Means of Application of International Law 15 2. Poland 18 2.1. The Legal Setting for Judicial Dialogue 18 2.2. Deference to International and Foreign Courts Decisions 23 2.2.1. References Prompted by Applicants or Made Proprio Motu 23 2.2.2. Identification of Customary International Law – Skrzypek, Natoniewski and Nigerian Embassy 26 3. The Czech Republic 29 3.1. The Legal Setting for Judicial Dialogue 29 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Courts and European Integration Les Cours
    Kosice, 19 septembre/September 2002 Restricted CDL-STD(2002) 036 Or. Arc en ciel. Science and technique of democracy, No. 36 Science et technique de la démocratie N° 36 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) COMMISSION EUROPEENNE POUR LA DEMOCRATIE PAR LE DROIT (COMMISSION DE VENISE) Constitutional Courts and European Integration Les Cours constitutionnelles et l’intégration européenne CDL-STD(2002)036 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS / TABLE DES MATIERES page REPORTS AND REPLIES TO QUESTIONNAIRE INTRODUCTION - M. Dominique ROUSSEAU.......................................................................4 QUESTIONNAIRE ON CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION...............................................................................................................................9 QUESTIONNAIRE SUR LES COURS CONSTITUTIONNELLES ET L’INTEGRATION EUROPEENNE...........................................................................................14 BULGARIA - Mr Hristo DANOV...............................................................................................19 REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE - M. Jiří MALENOVSKÝ ..........................................................24 ESTONIA - Mr Uno LÖHMUS...................................................................................................35 FINLAND - Justice Pauline KOSKELO ....................................................................................45 FINLAND - Justice Heikki KANNINEN....................................................................................55
    [Show full text]