DOCSLIB.ORG

Buffalo Avenue Heritage District Revitalization Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Buffalo Avenue Heritage District Revitalization Strategy Buffalo Avenue Heritage District Revitalization Strategy August, 2009 Prepared for: Prepared by: USA Niagara City of Development Niagara Falls Corporation REVITALIZATION STRATEGY TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ v Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 WHY BUFFALO AVENUE? ITS HERITAGE ............................................................................................................................. 2 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3 GUIDING PRINCIPLES ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 ISSUES FACING THE DISTRICT ............................................................................................................................................ 6 The Vision ........................................................................................................................................... 8 20-YEAR ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN .............................................................................................................. 9 Elements of the Vision ....................................................................................................................... 11 DISTRICT CHARACTER AND AMBIENCE ........................................................................................................................... 12 ▪ DISTRICT THEME ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 ▪ HERITAGE TOURISM .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Cultural Interpretation .............................................................................................................................................................. 14 District Branding ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Interpretive Elements ............................................................................................................................................................... 15 Tourist Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................................... 15 ▪ HISTORIC DESIGNATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 State and National Register ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 Individual Nominations ............................................................................................................................................................ 18 Local Historic Designation ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 ▪ AUTHENTIC MATERIALS ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 Structure Relocation ................................................................................................................................................................ 20 Structure Deconstruction ......................................................................................................................................................... 20 ▪ NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP ................................................................................................................................................... 21 STREETSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................................................... 22 ▪ CIRCULATION .................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Circulation Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Paths/Trails .............................................................................................................................................................................. 25 Roundabouts ........................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Gateway Treatments ............................................................................................................................................................... 25 i BUFFALO AVENUE HERITAGE DISTRICT Alley System ............................................................................................................................................................................ 26 Private Roads .......................................................................................................................................................................... 27 ▪ STREET CONFIGURATION .................................................................................................................................................... 28 ▪ STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS .................................................................................................................................................... 30 ▪ STREETSCAPE DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 31 ▪ STREETSCAPE COST ESTIMATES .......................................................................................................................................... 32 ▪ STREETSCAPE PHASING ...................................................................................................................................................... 32 ▪ POTENTIAL STREETSCAPE FUNDING SOURCES ..................................................................................................................... 34 DEVELOPMENT PATTERN .................................................................................................................................................... 36 ▪ HISTORIC .......................................................................................................................................................................... 36 ▪ EXISTING ........................................................................................................................................................................... 38 ▪ FUTURE ............................................................................................................................................................................. 40 ▪ DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS ................................................................................................................................................. 42 ▪ LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT—RAINBOW BOULEVARD ......................................................................................................... 44 ▪ ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS ................................................................................................................................. 45 ▪ FINANCIAL ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................................................................... 46 ▪ TARGETED FINANCIAL INCENTIVES ....................................................................................................................................... 48 Proposed Technical Assistance Program ............................................................................................................................... 48 Proposed Permit Fee Program ................................................................................................................................................ 49 Proposed Exterior Improvement Program ............................................................................................................................... 49 Proposed Micro-Grant Program .............................................................................................................................................. 50 Property Tax Abatements ........................................................................................................................................................ 50 ▪ IMPACT OF INCENTIVE PROGRAMS ....................................................................................................................................... 51 ▪ ADDRESSING VACANT PARCELS .........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Downtown Neighborhood City of Niagara Falls: Phase I
    Intensive Level Survey Historic Resources – Downtown Neighborhood City of Niagara Falls: Phase I 3.0 Historical Overview This section provides a narrative history of the City of Niagara Falls with specific emphasis on the Downtown neighborhood. The overview addresses significant trends and themes associated with the city’s historic context. The Downtown neighborhood’s period of significance is identified and examined in this chapter. Martin Wachadlo, architectural historian, conducted the background historic research. 3.1 Niagara County: Physiology and Geology Figure 3-1. Niagara Falls, Niagara Falls, New York Niagara County borders the southern shore of Lake Ontario in the extreme northwestern corner of New York State, and occupies part of the Huron and Ontario Plains. The Ontario Plain comprises part of Lake Ontario to the foot of the Niagara Escarpment1, and the Huron plain extends from the crest of the escarpment southward beyond the county line. The Niagara Escarpment begins in Watertown, New York, USA and extends westerly along the Manitoulin Island in the Province of Ontario, Canada. The escarpment continues through Wisconsin and Illinois. With geological material measuring 64-ft thick, the stratigraphy at Niagara Falls provides a glimpse into the overall rock types comprising the Niagara Escarpment (Figure 3-1). The top layer is Lockport Dolomite, a hard rock referred to as the "Lower Silurian Group." Below the top layer is Rochester Shale, which is much softer and wears away easily with the effects of erosion. Under the shale are harder strata of limestone and dolostone known as the "Clinton Group." Below the harder strata is Grimsby sandstone.
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara National Heritage Area Study
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Niagara National Heritage Area Study Study Report 2005 Contents Executive Summaryr .................................................................................................. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................5 Part 1: Study Purpose and Backgroundr Project History ....................................................................................................................11 Legislation ..........................................................................................................................11 Study Process ......................................................................................................................12 Planning Context ................................................................................................................15 The Potential for Heritage Tourism ..................................................................................20 Part 2: Affected Environmentr .............................................................................. Description of the Study Area ..........................................................................................23 Natural Resources ..............................................................................................................24 Cultural Resources ..............................................................................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara Falls National Heritage Area Commission
    Niagara Falls National Heritage Area Part II – Management Plan Niagara Falls National Heritage Area Commission July 2012 NIAGARA FALLS NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA Part II - Management Plan Submitted to: The Niagara Falls National Heritage Area Commission U.S. National Park Service and Ken Salazar U.S. Secretary of the Interior Consulting team: John Milner Associates, Inc. Heritage Strategies, LLC National Trust for Historic Preservation Bergmann Associates July 2012 NIAGARA FALLS NATIONAL HERITAGE A REA MANAGEMENT PLAN Part II – Implementation Plan ii NIAGARA FALLS NATIONAL HERITAGE A REA MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents PART II ─ MANAGEMENT PLAN CHAPTER 1 ─ CONCEPT AND APPROACH 1.1 What is a National Heritage Area? ................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Designation of the Niagara Falls National Heritage Area ................................ 1-2 1.3 Vision, Mission, and Goals of the National Heritage Area .............................. 1-3 1.4 The Heritage Area’s Preferred Alternative ....................................................... 1-4 1.5 National Signifi cance of the Heritage Area ......................................................1-6 1.6 The National Heritage Area Concept ............................................................... 1-8 1.6.1 Guiding Principles................................................................................... 1-8 1.6.2 Using the Management Plan ................................................................... 1-9 1.6.3 Terminology ............................................................................................1-9
    [Show full text]
  • City of Niagara Falls Comprehensive Plan to Focus New Development in the Core City and Along Existing Nodes and Corridors
    COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, USA 2009 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, NEW YORK Mayor Paul A. Dyster, Chief Executive Officer Donna Owens, City Administrator Niagara Falls City Council Mr. Samuel Fruscione - City Council Chair Mr. Robert Anderson Jr - Council Member Mr. Steven Fournier - Council Member Mr. Chris Robins - Council Member Mr. Charles Walker - Council Member N IAGARA F ALLS COMPREHENSIVE P LAN CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS PLANNING BOARD 2008 MEMBERS Angelo D’Aloise, Chairperson Richard Smith, Vice-Chairperson Geraldine Donovan Harold (Hal) Faba Marjorie Gillies Mark Grozio Michael Lewis Timothy Polka Zebedee Turk CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS PLANNING STAFF Peter Kay, Director of Planning and Economic Development Thomas J. DeSantis, AICP, Senior Planner Joseph Collura, Economic Development Professional Derek Waltho, Planner II/HPS Alan Nusbaum, Environmental Assistant/GIS Coordinator Bonnie Smith, Recording Secretary N IAGARA F ALLS COMPREHENSIVE P LAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Niagara Falls Strategic and Comprehensive Plans are the result of the efforts of many individuals, members of the community who shared their thoughts and comments concerning the future of the city most intently throughout the period from 2001-04, including the Planning, Economic and Community Development, and Inspections. The ideas and thoughts expressed by those who have taken an active interest in the planning process resulted in an inspiring and compelling Strategic Master Plan, which was publicly released in the Fall of 2004 to great acclaim and broad community support. We would like to acknowledge and thank the following people for sharing their input through meetings and stakeholder interviews, participation in the Stakeholder Workshop, or simply by taking the time to engage the project team in a conversation about their ideas or activities.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 City of Niagara Falls, New York: Architectural Overview1
    Intensive Level Historic Resources Survey – Downtown Neighborhood City of Niagara Falls: Phase I 4.0 CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, NEW YORK: ARCHITECTURAL OVERVIEW1 This section provides a general context for architectural styles represented in the neighborhood, a detailed narrative of the architectural development, and existing conditions of the neighborhood. Frank R. Kowsky authored the Architectural Overview (Sections 4.1-4.6). The results and recommendations are presented in the last section (Section 4.7) 4.1 City of Niagara Falls: Before 1800 4.1.1 French and English Colonization The modern city of Niagara Falls, New York, occupies land that entered European consciousness in the 1530s with the arrival in the New World of French explorer Jacques Cartier. While Cartier, who discovered the St. Lawrence River and founded the city of Montreal, heard reports about the Falls, but never saw them. In 1608, another French explorer, Samuel de Champlain, published a description of the Cataract, although he himself had apparently not seen it either. Both Champlain and Cartier had based their written accounts of the Falls on the word of Native Americans they had encountered on their travels. French missionaries were the first Europeans to see the Falls and to have contact with the Iroquois, the native peoples who, since the 1650s, controlled the Niagara area. In 1678, Father Louis Hennepin, a Belgian Franciscan in the entourage of Sieur de la Salle, the explorer of the Great Lakes, gave the oldest surviving European written and visual account of the Falls. During the following year, LaSalle himself visited the area and became the first European recorded to have walked the portage trail that Indians used to skirt the Falls.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (Ceds)
    NIAGARA COUNTY, NEW YORK COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (CEDS) SUBMITTED TO UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION JUNE 2010 Prepared by: NIAGARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 6311 Inducon Corporate Drive Sanborn, New York 14132 www.nccedev.com Samuel M. Ferraro, Commissioner NIAGARA COUNTY LEGISLATURE www.niagaracounty.com William L. Ross, Chair Marasco, Richard A. Kimble, Renae Cafarella, Jason J. Virtuoso, Dennis F., Minority Leader Sandonato, Vincent M. Sklarski, Danny W. Farnham, Gerald K. Burmaster, Clyde L., Vice-Chair Rizzo, Phillip “Russ” Smolinski, Peter E. Paul B. Wojtaszek Ceretto, John D. Godfrey, David E. Nemi, Anthony McNall, W. Keith Updegrove, Richard E., Majority Leader Syracuse, John Michael A. Hill Gregory D. Lewis, Niagara County Manager ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Richard E. Updegrove, Chair Ceretto, John D., Vice Chair Cafarella, Jason J. Rizzo, Phillip “Russ” Ross, William L. Sandonato, Vincent M. Sklarski, Danny Virtuoso, Dennis F. 2010 COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY COMMITTEE (CEDS) Ross, William L. Updegrove, Richard E. Ferraro, Samuel M. Alterio Brennen, Deanna Bittner, James Butcher, John Cliffe, Robert Collura, Joseph DeSantis, Tom Dunn, Clara Dyster, Paul A. Ellis, Wright H. Evert, William J. Helfrich, George Lehman, Paul MacDonald, Kevin Meyerhofer, Mark A. Oswald, Lynn M. Parise, Paul Redman, Michael Restaino, Anthony Richards, Steven C. Roma, Frank Santiago, Joyce Solomon, Erik M. Sullivan, James B. Weeks, Thomas Wolfgang, Jerald Lewis, Gregory D.* Orsi, Christina * Thompson, Honorable Antoine M.* Maziarz, Honorable George D. * DelMonte, Honorable Francine * Corwin, Honorable Jane * Hawley, Honorable Stephen Hayes, Honorable James P. * Schimminger, Honorable Robin * Slaughter, Honorable Louise M. * Lee, Honorable Christopher A.* * Ex-Officio TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I.
    [Show full text]
  • Ellicott Development Company: a Family Enterprise Case Study of Uncommon Vision and Relentless Execution
    Ellicott Development Case Study Wittmeyer and Watson Ellicott Development Company: A Family Enterprise Case Study of Uncommon Vision and Relentless Execution By Carol B. Wittmeyer Ed.D. and John G. Watson Ph.D. (1943-2011) Dedication This paper is dedicated to my esteemed mentor and colleague, Dr. John G. Watson, who helped develop the concept for this case study and conducted early research. It also honors the memory of Patrick J. Paladino, whose early assistance with interviews, tours and photos gave momentum to this project. His tragic death in 2009 at age 29 inspired his father, Carl P. Paladino, to pursue his passions for public service. Background Business students at St. Bonaventure University complete their coursework with an interdisciplinary capstone project. Drawing from their analyses of business cases, they synthesize what they have learned about developing business strategies and execution tactics. Most often, the companies studied are public, as extensive information about such companies is readily available. However, public companies do not represent the primary engine of business; most of the world’s enterprises are in fact private and family-controlled. To reflect this reality, we set out to write case studies for St. Bonaventure students that focus on family- controlled firms. We also looked to study local enterprises that had special relationships with the university. We were delighted when Carl Paladino ’68, family business executive in residence, agreed to assist us in writing a case study on his firm: Ellicott Development Co. A real estate leasing, management and development firm, EDC manages more than 5 million square feet of office, retail, hotel and residential space, and is the largest private landlord in downtown Buffalo.
    [Show full text]
  • A ULI Advisory Services Panel Report Niagara Falls September 23–28,2012 New York
    Niagara Falls New York September 23–28, 2012 Advisory ServicesReport Panel A ULI Niagara Falls New York Strategies for Reimagining the Former Rainbow Centre Mall and Downtown Niagara Falls September 23–28, 2012 Funded in part through generous grants from: Advisory Services Panel Report National Grid and Urban Land Institute Foundation A ULI A ULI About the Urban Land Institute THE MISSION OF THE URBAN LAND INSTItute is ■■ Sharing knowledge through education, applied research, to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in publishing, and electronic media; and creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. ■■ Sustaining a diverse global network of local practice ULI is committed to and advisory efforts that address current and future ■■ Bringing together leaders from across the fields of real challenges. estate and land use policy to exchange best practices Established in 1936, the Institute today has nearly 30,000 and serve community needs; members worldwide, representing the entire spectrum ■■ Fostering collaboration within and beyond ULI’s of the land use and development disciplines. ULI relies membership through mentoring, dialogue, and problem heavily on the experience of its members. It is through solving; member involvement and information resources that ULI has been able to set standards of excellence in develop- ■■ Exploring issues of urbanization, conservation, regen- ment practice. The Institute has long been recognized eration, land use, capital formation, and sustainable as one of the world’s most respected and widely quoted development; sources of objective information on urban planning, ■■ Advancing land use policies and design practices growth, and development. that respect the uniqueness of both built and natural environments; Cover photo: USA Niagara Development Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-NRHC-Program-Draft-Niagara
    Standing on the Edge: Challenging Boundaries and Power 2014 Northeast Regional Honors Council Conference Statement he history of the city and region of Niagara Falls is as rich and as a honeymoon destination, popularized by the 1953 film “Niagara” Tdramatic as the natural wonders that form the boundary between starring Marilyn Monroe. the United States and Canada. For centuries, the thundering waters have lured settlers and visitors. In the 1800s, the falls began to serve In the 1950s and early 1960s the area witnessed an economic boom as a major source of industrial power. Today they again drive the as several industries moved into the city to take advantage of the hy- tourism industry that is the city’s and region’s major revenue source, droelectric power and the higher demand for household and industrial attracting an annual 10 million visitors who want to see those thun- products. The city’s population rose to more than 100,000. This pe- dering waters. After surviving severe economic decline triggered by riod of prosperity ended in the mid-1960s, marked by the collapse of the collapse of its heavy industry and environmental disasters, the the locally owned Schoellkopf Power Project into the Niagara River. city’s and region’s leaders, economic planners and developers see themselves on the edge of a brighter future, just like the success their The heavy industry in the city of Niagara Falls included Hooker Canadian counterparts enjoy a short walk away across the border in Electrochemical Company, which used a small body of water, Love Ontario. The interplay of power and beauty places Niagara Falls at Canal, for disposal of its toxic chemical waste.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Weekly Lists for 2006
    National Register of Historic Places 2006 Weekly Lists January 6, 2006 ............................................................................................................................................. 3 January 13, 2006 ......................................................................................................................................... 13 January 20, 2006 ......................................................................................................................................... 16 January 27, 2006 ......................................................................................................................................... 22 February 3, 2006 ......................................................................................................................................... 27 February 10, 2006 ....................................................................................................................................... 33 February 17, 2006 ....................................................................................................................................... 47 February 24, 2006 ....................................................................................................................................... 57 March 3, 2006 ............................................................................................................................................. 63 March 10, 2006 ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 247/Tuesday, December 27, 2005
    76466 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 27, 2005 / Notices comments. The Draft Plan/DEIS made available for public inspection in acres); Moonshine Ridge ACEC (9,231 addresses management on their entirety. acres); Shinarump ACEC (3,619 acres); approximately 3,322,960 acres of public FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Virgin River Corridor ACEC (2,063 land. Issues addressed in the Draft Plan/ Diana Hawks, Bureau of Land acres); and Virgin Slope ACEC (40,206 DEIS include access, wilderness, Management, 345 East Riverside Drive, acres). Nine of these ACECs (127,193 protection of resources including St. George, Utah 84790, telephone (435) acres) are carried forward from the monument objects, livestock grazing 688–3266; or Darla Sidles, National Park Arizona Strip RMP (1992), five are new management, and recreation Service, Grand Canyon-Parashant ACECs. There are up to six additional management. The range of alternatives National Monument, 345 East Riverside potential ACECs in one or more of the was prepared in accordance with Drive, St. George, Utah 84790, telephone other alternatives: Buckskin ACEC (160 applicable BLM and NPS planning (435) 688–3226. acres); Clayhole ACEC (7,362 acres); procedures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Grand Gray Points ACEC (12,881 acres); Canyon-Parashant National Monument Hurricane Cliffs ACEC (23,464 acres); DATES: Written comments on the Draft Lime Kiln/Hatchett Canyon ACEC Plan/DEIS will be accepted for 90 days (Parashant) was established by Presidential Proclamation on January (11,731 acres); and, Twist Hills ACEC following the date the Environmental (1,255 acres). The following types of Protection Agency (EPA) publishes its 11, 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (Ceds)
    NIAGARA COUNTY, NEW YORK COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (CEDS) SUBMITTED TO UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION JUNE 2012 Prepared by: NIAGARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 6311 Inducon Corporate Drive Sanborn, New York 14132 www.nccedev.com Samuel M. Ferraro, Commissioner NIAGARA COUNTY LEGISLATURE www.niagaracounty.com William L. Ross, Chair Clyde L. Burmaster, Vice-Chair Chereé J. Copelin Owen T. Steed Jason A. Zona Dennis F. Virtuoso, Minority Leader Kathryn L. Lance Peter E. Smolinski Paul B. Wojtaszek David E. Godfrey Anthony J. Nemi Wm. Keith McNall Richard E. Updegrove, Majority Leader Dr. John Syracuse Michael A. Hill Jeffrey M. Glatz, Niagara County Manager ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Legislator Richard E. Updegrove, Chair Legislators Michael A. Hill, Vice Chair Chereé J. Copelin David E. Godfrey Kathryn L. Lance William L. Ross Owen T. Steed 2012 COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY COMMITTEE (CEDS) Ross, William L. Updegrove, Richard E. Ferraro, Samuel M. Alterio Brennen, Deanna Bell, R. Charles Bittner, James Butcher, John Cliffe, Robert Collura, Joseph DeSantis, Thomas Dyster, Paul A. Dunn, Clara Ellis, Wright H. Helfrich, George Lovejoy Maloney, Cathy Oswald, Lynn M. Redman, Michael Restaino, Anthony Richards, Steven C. Roma, Frank Santiago, Joyce See, David Solomon, Erik M. Sullivan, James B. Weeks, Thomas Wolfgang, Jerald Glatz, Jeffrey M. * Orsi, Christina * Maziarz, Honorable George D. * Grisanti, Honorable Mark * Ceretto, Honorable John D. * Corwin, Honorable Jane L.* Hawley, Honorable Stephen Walter, Honorable Raymond * Schimminger, Honorable Robin * Slaughter, Honorable Louise M. * Hochul, Honorable Kathleen C.* * Ex-Officio TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 II. ORGANIZATION 2 III. WHERE WE ARE NOW 3 A.
    [Show full text]