New Zealand Skeptic Skeptical Thinking About Charity Effective Vs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Discursive Construction of Cultural Diversity by the Flag Consideration Panel
Flagging diversity: The discursive construction of cultural diversity by the Flag Consideration Panel Taylor Annabell, Auckland University of Technology, [email protected] Angelique Nairn, Auckland University of Technology, [email protected] Abstract The Flag Consideration Project invited New Zealanders to change the New Zealand flag, and in doing so provided an opportunity for public discussion about what it means to belong to a nation. This article examines the contemporary conceptualisations of New Zealand offered in the 5 Alternatives text that accompanied the first flag consideration referendum. Given the increasing levels of cultural diversity and the historical difficulty faced in ensuring that multiple cultures contribute to the construction of New Zealand, the analysis focuses on constructions of cultural diversity. We used Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis to consider ideologies of nationhood prevalent in the text; in particular, we were interested in insights pertaining to bicultural and multicultural constructions of New Zealand. As it happens, the attempts made by the Flag Participation Panel to construct cultural diversity through asserting that New Zealand is inclusive and multicultural, and by referring to Māori culture as well as Chinese. On a surface level, it appears that the constructions address the limitations attached to the current flag, and specifically its Pākehā symbolism. However, the language used by the Panel indicates a continued reliance on a Pākehā perspective of New Zealand and the positioning of Māori as outside the mainstream. Therefore, although the text may have attempted to emphasise commonality and unity regardless of cultural affiliations, it inevitably tokenises cultural difference and offers a seemingly shallow notion of New Zealand as inclusive. -
Meagher Ices the Competition Over 30 Seasons Sitting at 495 Career Wins, New Members for Fall 2013 Coach Terry Meagher Has
T!" U.S. MAIL 1st CLASS Postage PAID Bowdoin College BRUNSWICK, MAINE B !"#!$% THE NATION’S OLDEST CONTINUOUSLY PUBLISHEDO COLLEGE&$'%( WEEKLY VOLUME 142, NUMBER 18 MARCH 1, 2013 DEER FRIENDS LePage cuts Medicaid budget; 20,000 Mainers to be affected Cuts save Maine $4 million and reduce MaineCare’s eligibility threshold to 133 of the federal poverty line, down from 150%. BY MARISA MCGARRY ORIENT STAFF A series of cuts to MaineCare— Maine’s Medicaid program—will go into e* ect today , a* ecting the health- care coverage of nearly 20,000 people statewide. Governor Paul LePage pro- posed the cuts late last year. Early this year the Department of COURTESY OF THE STATE OF MAINE Health and Human Services (HHS) approved cuts for “the optional group of the few states to provide Medicaid of parents and caretakers” previously bene+ ts for impoverished childless HY KHONG, THE BOWDOIN ORIENT covered. It also approved reducing the adults. ) is will no longer be the case The Antlers, an indie rock group based in Brooklyn, New York, headlined last weekend’s WBOR spring concert. MaineCare eligibity threshold of poor come January 2014, when another se- Mainers from 150 percent of the fed- ries of cuts go into e* ect. eral poverty level to 133 percent. In ad- Maine Equal Justice Partners dition, the new cuts reduce bene+ ts for (MEJP), an Augusta-based + rm, an- Colm Tóibín speaks on silence and storytelling elderly Mainers who are otherwise able nounced on February 21 that it would to recieve coverage through Medicare. be suing HHS, on behalf of + ve plan- BY LINDA KINSTLER Sons” (2006), and “New Ways to Kill slowly blanketing the city: “Yes, “) ese cuts are not easy decisions ti* s, arguing that these cuts are illegal. -
Here Are Many Heroes of the Skeptical Movement, Past and Present
THE COMMITTEE FOR THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION OF CLAIMS OF THE PARANORMAL AT THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY-INTERNATIONA! (ADJACENT TO THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO) • AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy. State University of New York at Buffalo Barry Karr, Executive Director Joe Nickell, Senior Research Fellow Lee Nisbet, Special Projects Director FELLOWS James E. Alcock,* psychologist. York Univ., Thomas Gilovich, psychologist, Cornell Univ. Dorothy Nelkin, sociologist, New York Univ. Toronto Henry Gordon, magician, columnist, Joe Nickell,* senior research fellow, CSICOP Steve Allen, comedian, author, composer, Toronto Lee Nisbet* philosopher, Medaille College pianist Stephen Jay Gould, Museum of Bill Nye, science educator and television Jerry Andrus, magician and inventor, Comparative Zoology, Harvard Univ. host, Nye Labs Albany, Oregon Susan Haack, Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts James E. Oberg, science writer Robert A. Baker, psychologist, Univ. of and Sciences, prof, of philosophy, Loren Pankratz, psychologist Oregon Kentucky University of Miami Stephen Barrett, M.D., psychiatrist, author, C. E. M. Hansel, psychologist Univ. of Wales Health Sciences Univ. consumer advocate, Allentown, Pa. Al Hibbs, scientist. Jet Propulsion Laboratory John Paulos, mathematician. Temple Univ. Barry Beyerstein, * biopsychologist, Simon Douglas Hofstadter, professor of human W. V. Quine, philosopher, Harvard Univ. Fraser Univ., Vancouver, B.C., Canada understanding and cognitive science, Milton Rosenberg, psychologist. Univ. of Irving Biederman, psychologist, Univ. of Indiana Univ. Chicago Southern California Gerald Holton, Mallinckrodt Professor of Wallace Sampson, M.D., clinical professor Susan Blackmore, psychologist, Univ. of the Physics and professor of history of science, of medicine, Stanford Univ. West of England, Bristol Harvard Univ. -
Actor and Berkshire Parent Sydney Greenstreet's Letters from the Road
Fall 2011/ Winter 2012 BERKSHIRE BULLETIN Actor and Berkshire Parent Sydney Greenstreet’s Letters From the Road OPENING SHOT Big Buss for Brett MARLEE WALLINGFORD ’76 and BESS MALTZ ANDREWS ’81 welcomed BRETT PUTNAM ’81 to his thirtieth reunion last May. Brett is the son of the ever legendary Em Putnam, a former longtime administrator here. Berkshire Bulletin Fall 2011/Winter 2012 BERKSHIRE BULLETIN 2 Reaction 5 Under the Dome 24 College Essays 26 Alumni Events 28 Reunion Weekend 37 Alumni Authors 38 Our Man in Mexico During Reunion Weekend last spring, LUKE HARAN, president of “The Great Class of 1961,” presented Head of School Mike Maher with a plaque 44 As ever — Sydney formally naming the Great Room in Berkshire Hall, representing a fiftieth-reunion gift of $370,462. A great class, indeed: its members also established two scholar- 55 From Students to Heads ship funds: the Class of 1961 John F. Godman Fund in 1985 and the Class of 1961 Edward H. Hunt Scholarship Fund in 2006. 57 Class Notes 74 In Memoriam Cover: Sydney Greenstreet’s correspondence to Seaver Buck came from whichever city he happened to be appearing in at the time. 80 Of Rogers and Heart Rooted in an inspiring natural setting, Berkshire School instills the highest standards of character and citizenship and a commitment to academic, artistic, and athletic excellence. Our community fosters diversity, a dedication to environmental stewardship, and an enduring love for learning. STEPHEN P. NORMAN ’60, President, Board of Trustees DESIGN: Julie Hammill, Hammill Design Michael J. Maher, Head of School PRINTING: Quality Printing Company, Pittsfield, Mass. -
Environmental Pseudoscience
SKEPTICISM . SCIENCE . SOCIETY Vol 38, No 4. December 2018 Green Meanies? Environmental Pseudoscience +Phrenology, Hoaxes Energy & Skepticon 2018 Australian Skeptics . www.skeptics.com.au Skeptic_Cover_Dec18.indd 1 3/12/2018 8:19 pm The Skeptic December 18 Skeptical Groups in Australia NSW VIC Australian Skeptics Inc – Eran Segev Australian Skeptics (Vic) Inc – Chris Guest www.skeptics.com.au PO Box 5166, Melbourne VIC 3001 PO Box 20, Beecroft, NSW 2119 Tel: 0403 837 339 [email protected] Tel: 02 8094 1894; Mob: 0432 713 195; Fax: (02) 8088 4735 [email protected] Skeptics’ Café – Third Monday of every month, with guest speaker. Meal from 6pm, speaker at 8pm sharp. More details on Sydney Skeptics in the Pub – 6pm first Thursday of each our web site www.skeptics.com.au/vic month at the Occidental Hotel, York Street in the city, near Wynyard Park (meeting second floor) Dinner meetings are held on a regular basis. Ballarat Skeptics in the Pub http://facebook.com/groups/3978112230309544 Hunter Skeptics – John Turner Tel: (02) 4959 6286 [email protected] Geelong Skeptics Society Contact: James Rolton [email protected] Occasional social meetings at the Cricketers Arms Hotel, Cooks Online group: See Facebook for details. Hill. Those on the contact list will be sent details in advance. Hosting the Annual Surf Coast Summer Skepticamp (February) Currently meeting at 12.30 on third Sunday of each odd-numbered month. Gippsland Skeptics in the Pub Interested parties contact Mark Guerin or Martin Christian Power Blue Mountains Skeptics via the Gippsland Skeptics page: https://www.facebook.com/gr See Facebook for details. -
Results Crankworx Rotorua Downhill Final Place: Rotorua Date: 3/25/2018
Results Crankworx Rotorua Downhill Final Place: Rotorua Date: 3/25/2018 # Bib Name Nation Hometown Sponsors Time Diff MEN | Elite (53) 1. 2 Samuel BLENKINSOP NZL Wanganui Norco Factory Racing Team, 100%3:13.10 2. 3 Mick HANNAH AUS Yorkeys Knob Polygon UR 3:18.24 +5.14 3. 9 Finn ILES CAN Whistler Specialized Gravity Team, 100%3:28.96 +15.86 4. 5 Dean LUCAS AUS Wooragee Intense Factory Racing, SRAM3:30.40 +17.30 5. 8 Brook MACDONALD NZL Hawkes Bay MS Mondraker 3:35.01 +21.91 6. 10 Eliot JACKSON USA Westlake Village Giant Factory Racing, SRAM 3:37.98 +24.88 7. 1 Loic BRUNI FRA Nice Specialized Gravity Team, 100%3:38.09 +24.99 8. 7 Charlie HARRISON USA Mission Viejo Intense Factory Racing, SRAM3:39.86 +26.76 9. 14 George BRANNIGAN NZL Queenstown GT Factory Racing 3:39.95 +26.85 10. 17 Jackson FREW AUS Canberra Commencal, Leatt, Sram, Oakley,3:41.28 enve, Thredbo+28.18 mtb 11. 6 Alexandre FAYOLLE FRA Marignane Polygon UR 3:47.67 +34.57 12. 33 Louis HAMILTON NZL Rotorua Commencal Bikes, Troy Lee Design,3:47.91 Oakley,+34.81 Spank, Ethika, Fiveten 13. 4 Rupert CHAPMAN NZL Christchurch Pivot Factory Racing 3:48.21 +35.11 14. 20 Austin WARREN USA Alpine YT Industries 3:54.88 +41.78 15. 13 Yuki KUSHIMA JPN Kawasaki GENBU/MONDRAKER 3:54.97 +41.87 16. 21 Bas VAN-STEENBERGENCAN Kelowna Hyper Bikes, Fox 3:56.11 +43.01 17. 55 Sean MCCARROLL AUS Cairns Arron Alta bike?s Mondraker 3:56.61 +43.51 18. -
Physiology of the Placebo Effect, and the Evidence for Changes in Brain Metabolism
THE NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association Physiology of the placebo effect, and the evidence for changes in brain metabolism Martin Wallace (This paper is based on a presentation to the NZ Skeptics’ Conference, 2008) Abstract Placebo effects are accompanied by localised changes in brain physiology. Variation between individuals in the extent of a placebo effect is due to genetic variation in brain enzyme activity. Some of the effect of any active drug is a placebo effect, and this should be considered in the evaluation of overall action. Early in 2008, Dr Tipu Aamir of the Auckland Pain Management Service drew my attention to the following. In a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of morphine after a standard knee operation, 30% of those receiving a placebo get pain relief. When those people are given a specific morphine antagonist (“antidote”), their pain comes back! My excited reaction had all the hallmarks of an epiphany. I needed to know more. After all, how could something that was “all in the mind” be changed predictably by a substance with a known pharmacological action? Any study of homeopathy raises the issue of the placebo effect. As a result of a meta- analysis of a number of studies comparing homeopathic remedies with orthodox treatment, it was concluded that the effect of homeopathic remedies was no greater than that of a placebo. 1 Not that they had no effect, but that it was no greater than that of a placebo. Sceptical thinkers are often happy to accept the explanation that if a response to some arcane practice is a placebo response, then that settles the issue. -
The Development of a Natural Health Products Bill Summary of Submissions Ministry of Health
The Development of a Natural Health Products Bill Summary of Submissions Ministry of Health. 2011. The Development of a Natural Health Products Bill: Summary of Submissions. Wellington: Ministry of Health. Published in June 2011 by the Ministry of Health PO Box 5013, Wellington 6145, New Zealand ISBN 978-0-478-36665-5 (online) HP 5230 This document is available on the Ministry of Health’s website: http://www.moh.govt.nz Contents Introduction 1 Overall Support for, and Opposition to, the Proposal 3 Responses to Specific Questions 5 Question 1: Do you support the proposed scope, purpose and principles for natural health product legislation? If not, what other suggestions do you have? 5 Question 2: Do you think the scope proposed for the definition of natural health product is appropriate? 6 Question 3: Are there products that would fall outside the definition that you think should be included? Conversely, are there products that fall within the definition that should be excluded? 7 Question 4: Are there any other functions that you consider the advisory committee should have? 8 Question 5: Do you agree with the concept of a consultative body and its possible role? 9 Question 6: Do you agree with the proposed self-certification scheme for product approval? If not, what would you like to see instead? 9 Question 7: Should an exemption from product approval apply to any particular types of natural health products (eg, certain homoeopathic preparations or aromatherapy products)? If so, please specify which types of products and indicate why you consider an exemption should apply. -
Volume 14 AJHR 50 Parliament.Pdf
APPENDIX TO THE JOURNALS OF THE House of Representatives OF NEW ZEALAND 2011–2014 VOL. 14 I—REPORTS AND PROCEEDINGS OF SELECT COMMITTEES IN THE REIGN OF HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND Being the Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand 0110–3407 WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND: Published under the authority of the House of Representatives—2015 ARRANGEMENT OF THE PAPERS _______________ I—Reports and proceedings of select committees VOL. 1 Reports of the Education and Science Committee Reports of the Finance and Expenditure Committee Reports of the Government Administration Committee VOL. 2 Reports of the Health Committee Report of the Justice and Electoral Committee Reports of the Māori Affairs Committee Reports of the Social Services Committee Reports of the Officers of Parliament Committee Reports of the Regulations Review Committee VOL. 3 Reports of the Regulations Review Committee Reports of the Privileges Committee Report of the Standing Orders Committee VOL. 4 Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 Estimates VOL. 5 Reports of select committees on the 2013/14 Estimates VOL. 6 Reports of select committees on the 2014/15 Estimates Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 7 Reports of select committees on the 2011/12 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 8 Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Crown entities, public organisations, and State enterprises VOL. -
The Ten Most Asked Questions About the New Zealand Flag
THE TEN MOST ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE NEW ZEALAND FLAG REFERENDUM PROCESS Palmerston North Rotary Club November 2nd 2015 Malcolm Mulholland Massey University New Zealand Flag Consideration Panel Member Tēnā koutou katoa. Many thanks for inviting me here today to address you regarding the New Zealand Flag Referendum Process. As a member of the panel it is our job to be neutral, not to promote any particular design, and to provide information where and when required and as such I welcome this opportunity to address you here today. As we embark upon the first referendum to rank the five alternative designs, I think it is important to address the ten most commonly asked questions in the hope of dispelling some of the myths so that people can make an informed and educated decision for the two referendums. 1. Are you worried about the level of feeling in the debate? No. In fact I’ve been encouraged by the amount of passionate responses. Why? Because it shows me that we care deeply about what is arguably our most prominent symbol of nationhood. Whether we stay with what we have or we decide upon a new ensign, it is vitally important that we get it right and that above all else that we have an emotional connection to our flag. We need to remember that the purpose of a flag is to incite a strong sense of patriotism. A flag that fulfils its purpose needs to summon every ounce of pride your being can feel. Call it making the hairs on the back of your neck stand on end, your heart beating twelve to the dozen, or not being able to swallow without detecting your Adam’s apple, this is the very purpose of a flag. -
New Zealand Skeptic 2015 Code of Ethics Consultation Submission to the Pharmacy Council
Number 117 Spring 2015 New Zealand Skeptic 2015 Code of Ethics Consultation Submission to the Pharmacy Council A Quiet Rebel An Interview with Sir John Scott Apocalypse How Armaggedon Anxiety at the NZ Skeptics Conference 2015 skeptics.nz ARTICLE CONTRIBUTIONS Contributions are welcome and should be sent to: CONTENTS P.O. Box 30501 3 Editorial Lower Hutt 5040 email: [email protected] 4 Letters to the Forum Deadline for next issue: 15 January 2016 Cartoon by Nick Kim Letters for the Forum may be edited as space requires – up to 7 Newsfront 250 words is preferred. Please indicate the publication and date of all clippings for Newsfront. 8 Submission to the Pharmacy Council by NZ Skeptics Committee Material supplied by email or web document is appreciated. Permission is given to other non-profit skeptical organisations 12 A Quiet Rebel: Sir John Scott to reprint material from this publication, provided the author and NZ Skeptic are acknowledged. by Robert Woolf and Steven Galbraith Opinions expressed in the NZ Skeptic are those of individual 15 Making Sense of Fluoride authors and do not necessarily represent the views of NZ by Luke Oldfield Skeptics or its officers. All references and citations for this issue can be found at 16 Apocalypse How skeptics.nz/journal/117 by Vicki Hyde 19 BioBlog NZ Skeptics Committee by Alison Campbell CHAIR Mark Honeychurch Barry Lennox SECRETARY Craig Shearer Steven Galbraith 20 Science-Based Medicine TREASURER Matt Beavan Brad MacClure by Steven Novella MEDIA Vicki Hyde Robert Woolf OUTREACH Lisa Taylor Clive -
John Shelby Spong : Courtesy of the Evening Post, 8 October 1997 L
THE JOU APOLOGIA RNAL OFTH jOHN SHELBY Photo ofBishopJ Retired Episcopalian Bishop diocese o Fides qua E WELLINGTO ohn Shelby Focus On Spong:Cour erens intel N CHR f newark,nj. tesy ISTIAN APOLOGE of The E vening P lect SPONG ost um , 8Oc TICS SOCIETY( tober 1997 © Inc.) V O L U M E 7 (2/3) - 2 0 0 0 The Wellington Christian Apologetics Society (Inc.) Statement of Belief We believe in: • The divine inspiration, infallibility and inerrancy of the Bible as originally given and its supreme authority in all matters of faith and conduct. The Bible comprises the 39 books of the Old Testament and 27 books of the New Testament. • The eternal, everlasting, self-existing nature of the Godhead, Who is the Maker of the universe, which is separate from, but being finite is completely dependent on Him; Who is both transcendent of and immanent within His creation; Who is the great I AM and Immanuel of the Christian Scriptures; Who is Creator and Saviour, Judge and Lover of humankind. • The unity of the individual Persons of the Holy Trinity: the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit in the Godhead; and the full divinity and humanity of the Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, Who was conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary. • The universal sinfulness of human nature and the universal guilt of mankind since the Fall, rendering all humanity subject to God’s wrath and condemnation. • Redemption from the guilt, penalty and power of sin only through the sacrificial death on the Cross (as Representative, Substitute, Victor etc.) of the Lord Jesus Christ, the incarnate Son of God.