DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 115/Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules 34077 14620; telephone number: (202) 554– DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ADDRESSES: You may submit 1404; e-mail address: TSCA- information by one of the following [email protected]. Fish and Wildlife Service methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 50 CFR Part 17 www.regulations.gov. In the box that document extends the public comment reads ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID,’’ enter the [Docket No. FWS-R1-ES-2010–0012] period established in the Federal Docket number for this finding, which Register of April 7, 2010 (75 FR 17645) [MO 92210-0-0008-B2] is FWS-R1-ES-2010-0012. Check the box (FRL–8811–7). In that document, EPA ‘‘ Endangered and Threatened Wildlife that reads Open for Comment/ ’’ seeks information about the use and Plants; 90-Day Finding on Five Submission, and then click the Search authorizations for PCBs. EPA is hereby Petitions to List Seven Species of button. You should then see an icon that ‘‘ ’’ extending the comment period, which Hawaiian Yellow-faced Bees as reads Submit a Comment. Please was set to end on July 6, 2010, to August Endangered ensure that you have found the correct 20, 2010. rulemaking before submitting your comment. The additional meeting in New York, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, • U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public NY will be held in the evening at the Interior. Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-R1- request of New York City parents who ACTION: Notice of 90–day petition finding and initiation of status review. ES-2010-0012; Division of Policy and would like to attend to comment on our Directives Management; U.S. Fish and request for comments on the excluded SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, products provisions, e.g., caulk, of the Wildlife Service (Service), announce a Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203. current PCB regulations. The additional 90–day finding on five petitions to list FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: meeting in San Francisco, CA will be seven species of Hawaiian yellow-faced Loyal Mehrhoff, Field Supervisor, held to accommodate West Coast bees (Hylaeus anthracinus, H. Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, stakeholders. In San Francisco, the assimulans, H. facilis, H. hilaris, H. 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122, meeting attendees will need photo kuakea, H. longiceps, and H. mana) as Honolulu, HI 96850; by telephone (808– identification. endangered and designate critical 792–9400); or by facsimile (808–792– You may submit a request to habitat under the Endangered Species 9581). Persons who use a participate in the public meeting as a Act of 1973, as amended (Act). telecommunications device for the deaf speaker or observer either in person or We find that the petitions present (TTD) may call the Federal Information as an observer only by teleconference. substantial scientific or commercial Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. Do not submit any information in your information indicating that listing these SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: request to participate that is considered seven species of Hawaiian yellow-faced bees may be warranted. Therefore, with Request for Information Confidential Business Information (CBI). the publication of this notice we are When we make a finding that a To access the docket, please follow initiating a status review of these petition presents substantial the detailed instructions as provided species and will issue 12–month information indicating that listing a under ADDRESSES in the April 7, 2010 findings on our determination as to species may be warranted, we are Federal Register document. If you have whether the petitioned actions are required to promptly review the status questions, consult the technical person warranted. To ensure that the status of the species (status review). For the listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION reviews are comprehensive, we are status review to be complete and based CONTACT. soliciting scientific and commercial data on the best available scientific and and other information regarding these commercial information, we request List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 761 species. We will make a determination information on the seven species of on critical habitat for these species if, Hawaiian yellow-faced bees (H. Environmental protection, Hazardous and when, we initiate a listing action. anthracinus, H. assimulans, H. facilis, substances, Labeling, Polychlorinated DATES: To allow us adequate time to H. hilaris, H. kuakea, H. longiceps, and biphenyls (PCBs), Reporting and conduct this review, we request that H. mana) from governmental agencies, recordkeeping requirements. information you submit be received by Native American Tribes, the scientific us on or before August 16, 2010. Please Dated: June 9, 2010. community, industry, or any other note that if you are using the Federal interested parties. We seek information Stephen A. Owens, eRulemaking Portal (see ‘‘ADDRESSES’’ on: Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical section, below), the deadline for (1) The species’ biology, range, and Safety and Pollution Prevention. submitting an electronic comment is population trends, including: [FR Doc. 2010–14522 Filed 6–15–10; 8:45 am] Eastern Standard Time on this date. (a) Habitat requirements for feeding, BILLING CODE 6560–50–S We will post all information received breeding, and sheltering; on http://www.regulations.gov. This (b) Genetics and taxonomy; generally means that we will post any (c) Historical and current range personal information you provide us including distribution patterns; (see the Request for Information section (d) Historical and current population below for more details). levels, and current and projected trends; After August 16, 2010, you must and submit information directly to the Field (e) Past and ongoing conservation Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION measures for the species, its habitat or CONTACT section below). Please note that both. we might not be able to address or (2) Information about the seven incorporate information that we receive Hawaiian yellow-faced bees relevant to after the above requested date. the factors that are the basis for making VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:22 Jun 15, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM 16JNP1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS 34078 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules a listing determination for a species in making a determination, as section Society (hereafter, ‘‘the petitioner’’). The under section 4(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et petitioner requested that we list seven 1531 et seq.), which are: seq.) directs that determinations as to species of Hawaiian yellow-faced bees (a) The present or threatened whether any species is a threatened or as endangered and that critical habitat destruction, modification, or endangered species must be made be designated under the Act. The curtailment of the species’ habitat or ‘‘solely on the basis of the best scientific petitions were clearly identified as range; and commercial data available.’’ petitions and included the requisite (b) Overutilization for commercial, You may submit your information identification of addresses and recreational, scientific, or educational concerning this status review by one of telephone numbers, but did not include purposes; the methods listed in the ADDRESSES the signature of the petitioner, as (c) Disease or predation; section. If you submit information via stipulated in 50 CFR 424.14(a). (d) The inadequacy of existing http://www.regulations.gov, your entire Nevertheless, we recognize the five regulatory mechanisms; or submission—including any personal documents as petitions. Each petition (e) Other natural or manmade factors identifying information—will be posted affecting its continued existence. contained information regarding the on the website. If your submission is species’ taxonomy and ecology, (3) Whether insect collecting presents made via a hardcopy that includes historical and current distribution, a threat to any of the seven Hawaiian personal identifying information, you present status, and potential causes of yellow-faced bee species. may request at the top of your document decline and current and potential (4) The potential cumulative effects of that we withhold this personal imminent threats. these factors that may threaten or identifying information from public endanger the seven Hawaiian yellow- review. However, we cannot guarantee On May 8, 2009, we sent a letter to the faced bee species. that we will be able to do so. We will petitioner acknowledging our receipt of (5) Management programs for the post all hardcopy submissions on http:// the petitions and explaining that we conservation of the seven Hawaiian www.regulations.gov. reviewed the information presented in yellow-faced bee species. Information and materials we receive, the petition and determined that issuing (6) The potential effects of climate as well as supporting documentation we an emergency regulation temporarily change on the seven Hawaiian yellow- used in preparing this finding, is listing the species under section 4(b)(7) faced bee species and their habitat. available for you to review at http:// of the Act was not warranted at that If, after the status reviews, we www.regulations.gov, or you may make time. This notice constitutes our 90–day determine that listing any of the seven an appointment during normal business finding for the petitions to list seven Hawaiian yellow-faced bees is hours at the Pacific Islands Fish and species of Hawaiian yellow-faced bees warranted, we will propose critical Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER (Hylaeus anthracinus, H. assimulans, H. habitat (see definition in section 3(5)(A) INFORMATION CONTACT). facilis, H. hilaris, H. kuakea, H. of the Act) under section 4 of the Act, longiceps, and H. mana). to the maximum extent prudent and Background determinable at the time we propose to Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act (16 Species Information list the species.
Recommended publications
  • Assessing the Presence and Distribution of 23 Hawaiian Yellow-Faced Bee Species on Lands Adjacent to Military Installations on O‘Ahu and Hawai‘I Island

    Assessing the Presence and Distribution of 23 Hawaiian Yellow-Faced Bee Species on Lands Adjacent to Military Installations on O‘Ahu and Hawai‘I Island

    The Hawai`i-Pacific Islands Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit & Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I AT MĀNOA Dr. David C. Duffy, Unit Leader Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way, St. John #408 Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 Technical Report 185 Assessing the presence and distribution of 23 Hawaiian yellow-faced bee species on lands adjacent to military installations on O‘ahu and Hawai‘i Island September 2013 Karl N. Magnacca1 and Cynthia B. K. King 2 1 Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Department of Botany, 3190 Maile Way Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822 2 Hawaii Division of Forestry & Wildlife Native Invertebrate Program 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 325 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 PCSU is a cooperative program between the University of Hawai`i and U.S. National Park Service, Cooperative Ecological Studies Unit. Author Contact Information: Karl N. Magnacca. Phone: 808-554-5637 Email: [email protected] Hawaii Division of Forestry & Wildlife Native Invertebrate Program 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 325 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813. Recommended Citation: Magnacca, K.N. and C.B.K. King. 2013. Assessing the presence and distribution of 23 Hawaiian yellow- faced bee species on lands adjacent to military installations on O‘ahu and Hawai‘i Island. Technical Report No. 185. Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, Hawai‘i. 39 pp. Key words: Hylaeus, Colletidae, Apoidea, Hymenoptera, bees, insect conservation Place key words: Oahu, Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, Puu Waawaa, Mauna Kea, Pohakuloa, North Kona Editor: David C. Duffy, PCSU Unit Leader (Email: [email protected]) Series Editor: Clifford W. Morden, PCSU Deputy Director (Email: [email protected]) About this technical report series: This technical report series began in 1973 with the formation of the Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa.
  • 25 Using Community Group Monitoring Data to Measure The

    25 Using Community Group Monitoring Data to Measure The

    25 Using Community Group Monitoring Data To Measure The Effectiveness Of Restoration Actions For Australia's Woodland Birds Michelle Gibson1, Jessica Walsh1,2, Nicki Taws5, Martine Maron1 1Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, 4072, Queensland, Australia, 2School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, 3800, Victoria, Australia, 3Greening Australia, Aranda, Canberra, 2614 Australian Capital Territory, Australia, 4BirdLife Australia, Carlton, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia, 5Greening Australia, PO Box 538 Jamison Centre, Macquarie, Australian Capital Territory 2614, Australia Before conservation actions are implemented, they should be evaluated for their effectiveness to ensure the best possible outcomes. However, many conservation actions are not implemented under an experimental framework, making it difficult to measure their effectiveness. Ecological monitoring datasets provide useful opportunities for measuring the effect of conservation actions and a baseline upon which adaptive management can be built. We measure the effect of conservation actions on Australian woodland ecosystems using two community group-led bird monitoring datasets. Australia’s temperate woodlands have been largely cleared for agricultural production and their bird communities are in decline. To reverse these declines, a suite of conservation actions has been implemented by government and non- government agencies, and private landholders. We analysed the response of total woodland bird abundance, species richness, and community condition, to two widely-used actions — grazing exclusion and replanting. We recorded 139 species from 134 sites and 1,389 surveys over a 20-year period. Grazing exclusion and replanting combined had strong positive effects on all three bird community metrics over time relative to control sites, where no actions had occurred.
  • US Air Force Pollinator Conservation

    US Air Force Pollinator Conservation

    U.S. Air Force Pollinator Conservation Reference Guide - Appendix A: Species maps and profiles Photo: Jim Hudgins/USFWS CC BY 2.0 2017 U.S. Air Force Pollinator Conservation Reference Guide Appendix A: Species maps and profiles Prepared for U.S. Air Force Civil Engineer Center Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Recommended citation: USFWS. 2017. U.S. Air Force Pollinator Conservation Reference Guide, Appendix A: Species information maps and profiles, Air Force Civil Engineer Center, San Antonio, TX, 88 pp. Page i ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMINOLOGY AFB = Air Force Base AFR = Air Force Range AGFD = Arizona Game and Fish Department ATV = all-terrain vehicle Bivoltine = two generations per year BLM = Bureau of Land Management BoR = Bureau of Reclamation CABI = Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International Caterpillar = larva of a butterfly, skipper or moth Chrysalis = pupa of a butterfly, skipper or moth Diapause = a dormant phase DoD = Department of Defense Eclose = emerge from a pupa ECOS = Environmental Conservation Online System ESBB = El Segundo blue butterfly FR = Federal Register FS (in text) or USFS(on maps)= Forest Service Gynes = reproductive females Half-life = estimated number of years until an additional 50% of the population is lost Host plant = food plant for larval butterflies, skippers and moths Instar = time between larval molts (larval stage) LLNB = lesser long-nosed bat NPS = National Park Service Oviposit = lay an egg or multiple eggs PIF = Partners in Flight PIF Yellow Watch List = Bird species that have restricted ranges and small populations. These species require constant care and long-term assessment to prevent population declines. Senesce = age and wither Univoltine = one generation per year USDA = U.S.
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Species Assessment and Listing Priority Assignment Form

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Species Assessment and Listing Priority Assignment Form

    U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SPECIES ASSESSMENT AND LISTING PRIORITY ASSIGNMENT FORM Scientific Name: Hylaeus facilis Common Name: easy yellow-faced bee Lead region: Region 1 (Pacific Region) Information current as of: 06/19/2014 Status/Action ___ Funding provided for a proposed rule. Assessment not updated. ___ Species Assessment - determined species did not meet the definition of the endangered or threatened under the Act and, therefore, was not elevated to the Candidate status. ___ New Candidate _X_ Continuing Candidate ___ Candidate Removal ___ Taxon is more abundant or widespread than previously believed or not subject to the degree of threats sufficient to warrant issuance of a proposed listing or continuance of candidate status ___ Taxon not subject to the degree of threats sufficient to warrant issuance of a proposed listing or continuance of candidate status due, in part or totally, to conservation efforts that remove or reduce the threats to the species ___ Range is no longer a U.S. territory ___ Insufficient information exists on biological vulnerability and threats to support listing ___ Taxon mistakenly included in past notice of review ___ Taxon does not meet the definition of "species" ___ Taxon believed to be extinct ___ Conservation efforts have removed or reduced threats ___ More abundant than believed, diminished threats, or threats eliminated. Petition Information ___ Non-Petitioned _X_ Petitioned - Date petition received: 03/23/2009 90-Day Positive:06/16/2010 12 Month Positive:09/06/2011 Did the Petition request a reclassification? No For Petitioned Candidate species: Is the listing warranted(if yes, see summary threats below) Yes To Date, has publication of the proposal to list been precluded by other higher priority listing? Yes Explanation of why precluded: We find that the immediate issuance of a proposed rule and timely promulgation of a final rule for this species has been, for the preceding 12 months, and continues to be, precluded by higher priority listing actions (including candidate species with lower LPNs).
  • Is Recovery Outline For

    Is Recovery Outline For

    ______________________________________________________________________ U.S.Is Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Outline for the Island of Oʻahu July 2018 Scientific Name/ Common Name PLANTS ANIMALS Bidens amplectens/ Ko‘oko‘olau Hylaeus kuakea/ Hawaiian yellow-faced bee Cyanea calycina/ Hāhā Hylaeus mana/ Hawaiian yellow-faced bee Cyanea lanceolata/ Hāhā Megalagrion nigrohamatum nigrolineatum/ Cyanea purpurellifolia/ Hāhā Blackline Hawaiian damselfly Cyrtandra gracilis/ Ha‘iwale Megalagrion leptodemas/ Crimson Hawaiian Cyrtandra kaulantha/ Ha‘iwale damselfly Cyrtandra sessilis/ Ha‘iwale Megalagrion oceanicum/ Oceanic Hawaiian Cyrtandra waiolani/ Ha‘iwale damselfly Doryopteris takeuchii/ No common name Korthalsella degeneri/ Hulumoa Melicope christophersenii/ Alani Melicope hiiakae/ Alani Melicope makahae/ Alani Platydesma cornuta var. cornuta/ No common name Platydesma cornuta var. decurrens/ No common name Pleomele forbesii/ Hala pepe Polyscias lydgatei/ No common name Pritchardia bakeri/ Baker’s Loulu Psychotria hexandra subsp. oahuensis/ Kōpiko Pteralyxia macrocarpa/ Kaulu Stenogyne kaalae subsp. sherffii/ No common name Zanthoxylum oahuense/ Mānele Recovery Outline for the Island of Oʻahu • 2018 Listing Status and Date Endangered; September 18, 2012 (77 FR 57648) and September 30, 2015 (80 FR 58820) Lead Agency/Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1 Lead Field Office Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122, Honolulu, Hawaiʻi 96850, (808) 792–9400 Purpose of the Recovery Outline: This document lays out a preliminary course of action for the survival and recovery of 20 plants and 3 damselflies endemic to the island of Oʻahu, all of which were listed endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 2012; and 2 plants and 2 Hawaiian yellow-faced bees also endemic to the island of Oʻahu, listed as endangered under the ESA in 2016 (USFWS 2012b, 2016b).
  • Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)

    Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)

    INSECTS OF HAWAII INSECTS OF HAWAII A Manual of the Insects of the Hawaiian Islands, including an Enumeration of the Species and Notes on Their Origin, Distribution, Hosts, Parasites, etc. VOLUME 17 HAWAIIAN HYLAEUS (NESOPROSOPIS) BEES (HYMENOPTERA: APOIDEA) by HOWELL V. DALY Professor Emeritus of Entomology University of California Berkeley, CA and KARL N. MAGNACCA Department of Entomology Cornell University Ithaca, NY University of Hawai‘i Press Honolulu CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3 THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS ............................................................................... 3 HISTORY OF COLLECTIONS AND TAXONOMY ........................................ 3 DISPERSAL AND EVOLUTION OF HYLAEUS SPECIES IN HAWAII ........ 7 BIOLOGY OF HYLAEUS ................................................................................... 9 NATIVE AND ADVENTIVE ENEMIES .......................................................... 9 ECOLOGY OF HYLAEUS IN HAWAII ........................................................... 11 NATIVE AND ADVENTIVE BEES OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS .......... 12 DESCRIPTIVE TERMINOLOGY .......................................................................... 14 KEYS TO SPECIES................................................................................................... 24 KEY TO MALES.............................................................................................
  • The Importance of Insect Monitoring to Conservation Actions in Hawaii

    The Importance of Insect Monitoring to Conservation Actions in Hawaii

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa CProceedingsonservation of relevan the hawaiianCe of inse entomologicalCt monitoring s ociety (2013) 45:149–166 149 The Importance of Insect Monitoring to Conservation Actions in Hawaii Matthew J. Medeiros1, 2*, Jesse A. Eiben3, William P. Haines4, Raina L. Kaholoaa5, Cynthia B.A. King6, Paul D. Krushelnycky4, Karl N. Magnacca7, Daniel Rubinoff4, Forest Starr8, and Kim Starr8 1Urban School of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117. 2University of California, Department of Integrative Biology, Berkeley, CA 94720. 3University of Hawaii at Hilo, College of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resource Management, Hilo, HI 96720. 4University of Hawaii at Manoa, Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, Honolulu, HI 96822. 5Haleakala National Park, Makawao, HI 96768. 6Hawaii Division of Forestry and Wildlife Native Invertebrate Program, 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 325, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813. 7Oahu Army Natural Resources Program, PCSU, Schofield Barracks, HI 96857. 8Starr Environmental, Makawao, HI 96768. *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected] Abstract. Endemic insect species make up the overwhelming majority of Hawaii’s native fauna, and play many important ecological roles. Despite this, insects receive low levels of conservation funding, likely due to their small size, fluctuating popula- tion sizes, and lack of baseline data necessary to determine if they are threatened with extinction. To determine which insects are at risk, how insect populations fluctuate in natural areas, and which management actions are most beneficial to Hawaiian ecosystems, we propose that insects be monitored whenever possible.
  • Profile for Hylaeus Assimulans

    Profile for Hylaeus Assimulans

    Magnacca, K. N. 2005. Species Profile: Hylaeus assimulans. In Shepherd, M. D., D. M. Vaughan, and S. H. Black (Eds). Red List of Pollinator Insects of North America. CD-ROM Version 1 (May 2005). Portland, OR: The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. ________________________________________________________________________ Hylaeus assimulans (Perkins, 1899) (Hymenoptera: Colletidae: Hylaeinae) ________________________________________________________________________ Profile Prepared by Karl Magnacca, USGS-BRD, Kilauea Field Station. ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY Hylaeus assimulans is a coastal and dry forest bee endemic to the islands of Oahu, Maui, Kahoolawe, and probably formerly Molokai in Hawaii. It is distinguished by its large size compared to other coastal species, and large facial marks. It is typically found as scattered individuals, and habitat destruction has caused its range to contract significantly. CONSERVATION STATUS Xerces Red List Status: Critically Imperiled Other Rankings: Canada – Species at Risk Act: N/A Canada – provincial status: N/A Mexico: N/A USA – Endangered Species Act: Species of Concern USA – state status: HI: Species of Concern NatureServe: GNR IUCN Red List: N/A ________________________________________________________________________ SPECIES PROFILE DESCRIPTION Males: Black, face marks yellow, the clypeus nearly entirely yellow and with dorsally narrowing marks laterally. Process of the eighth sternum narrowly dilated. Hairs of abdominal apex brown, appressed. Females: Entirely black, lacking coloration. Large, but without distinct punctation on the abdomen. Hylaeus assimulans is sister to H. ombrias in the flavipes species group; males can be told apart by the greater facial markings of H. assimulans, but females cannot be reliably distinguished except by distribution. The two species are considerably larger (especially in the females) than any other Hawaiian species except those in the pubescens group, RED LIST OF POLLINATOR INSECTS.
  • Profile for Hylaeus Facilis

    Profile for Hylaeus Facilis

    Magnacca, K. N. 2005. Species Profile: Hylaeus facilis. In Shepherd, M. D., D. M. Vaughan, and S. H. Black (Eds). Red List of Pollinator Insects of North America. CD-ROM Version 1 (May 2005). Portland, OR: The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. ________________________________________________________________________ Hylaeus facilis (F. Smith, 1879) (Hymenoptera: Colletidae: Hylaeinae) ________________________________________________________________________ Profile Prepared by Karl Magnacca, USGS-BRD, Kilauea Field Station. ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY Hylaeus facilis is a formerly widespread bee endemic to the islands of Oahu, Molokai, Lanai, and Maui in Hawaii. It is distinguished by its single, central face mark and unusually large gonoforceps. One of the most common species collected in the early 1900’s, it has been found very rarely in recent decades. CONSERVATION STATUS Xerces Red List Status: Critically Imperiled Other Rankings: Canada – Species at Risk Act: N/A Canada – provincial status: N/A Mexico: N/A USA – Endangered Species Act: Species of Concern USA – state status: HI: Species of Concern NatureServe: GNR IUCN Red List: N/A ________________________________________________________________________ SPECIES PROFILE DESCRIPTION Males: Face marks yellow, consisting of a single large spot covering the entire clypeus and a narrow stripe in the paraocular area; otherwise unmarked. Process of the eighth sternum thin, not dilated; apices of gonoforceps very long, visible in situ. Hairs of abdominal apex brown, appressed. Females: Entirely black, lacking coloration. Indistinguishable from females of H. difficilis and H. simplex. Hylaeus facilis is a member of the difficilis species group, possessing the characteristic facial marks and 8th sternum of that group. The large gonoforceps are unmistakable; its sister species, H. simplex, also has them enlarged, but they are not visible externally.
  • Invasive Ants Reduce Nesting Success of an Endangered Hawaiian Yellow-Faced Bee, Hylaeus Anthracinus

    Invasive Ants Reduce Nesting Success of an Endangered Hawaiian Yellow-Faced Bee, Hylaeus Anthracinus

    NeoBiota 64: 137–154 (2021) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/neobiota.64.58670 RESEARCH ARTICLE NeoBiota https://neobiota.pensoft.net Advancing research on alien species and biological invasions Invasive ants reduce nesting success of an endangered Hawaiian yellow-faced bee, Hylaeus anthracinus Sheldon Plentovich1, Jason R. Graham2, William P. Haines3, Cynthia B.A. King3 1 Pacific Islands Coastal Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Ala Moana Blvd, Rm 3-122, Honolulu, HI 96750, USA 2 Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, HI 96817, USA 3 Hawai‘i Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife, 1151 Punchbowl St. Rm. 325, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA Corresponding author: Sheldon Plentovich ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Sun | Received 23 September 2020 | Accepted 21 December 2020 | Published 28 January 2021 Citation: Plentovich S, Graham JR, Haines WP, King CBA (2021) Invasive ants reduce nesting success of an endangered Hawaiian yellow-faced bee, Hylaeus anthracinus. NeoBiota 64: 137–154. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.64.58670 Abstract Hawaii has a single group of native bees belonging to the genus Hylaeus (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) and known collectively as Hawaiian yellow-faced bees. The majority of the 63 species have experienced sig- nificant declines in range and population. In 2016, seven species received federal protection under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Competitors and predators, such as invasive bees, wasps and ants, are thought to be important drivers of range reductions and population declines, especially at lower elevations where more non-native species occur. We evaluated the effects of invasive ants on nesting Hylaeus anthra- cinus using artificial nest blocks that allowed us to track nest construction and development.
  • Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief (PDF)

    Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief (PDF)

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE ) COUNCIL, ) 40 West 20th Street, 11th Floor ) New York, NY 10011-4231 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) E. SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity ) 17-cv-2034 as the Administrator of the U.S. ) ECF Case Environmental Protection Agency ) William Jefferson Clinton Building ) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. ) Washington, DC 20460 ) and ) ) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, ) William Jefferson Clinton Building ) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. ) Washington, DC 20460 ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________________ COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF INTRODUCTION 1. This action challenges the failure of the federal government to evaluate the impacts of neonicotinoid pesticides (“neonics”) on threatened and endangered species, like the rusty patched bumble bee, the black-capped vireo, and the San Bruno elfin butterfly. 1 2. Neonics are “systemic” pesticides. When a plant is treated with a neonic, it absorbs the pesticide, making the tissues of the plant itself—including its pollen, fruit, and nectar—toxic to pests and other wildlife. 3. Neonics are insecticides, which kill insects by design. Neonics also harm birds, fish, amphibians, and invertebrate species, such as crustaceans, mollusks, and spiders. Because neonics can persist in the soil and water for several years and are used in high volumes for agriculture and gardening, they are ubiquitous in the environment throughout most of the country. 4. The widespread presence of neonics in the environment presents serious risks to wildlife across large portions of the country. The collapse of bee and other pollinator populations in the last decade, like that of the endangered rusty patched bumble bee, is one consequence of this contamination.
  • &lt;PRORULE&gt; &lt;PREAMB&gt; DEPARTMENT

    <PRORULE> <PREAMB> DEPARTMENT

    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/05/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-28536, and on FDsys.gov <PRORULE> <PREAMB> DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2014–0032; FF09E21000 FXES11190900000 145] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of review. SUMMARY: In this Candidate Notice of Review (CNOR), we, the U.S. Fish and 2 Wildlife Service (Service), present an updated list of plant and animal species native to the United States that we regard as candidates for or have proposed for addition to the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Identification of candidate species can assist environmental planning efforts by providing advance notice of potential listings, allowing landowners and resource managers to alleviate threats and thereby possibly remove the need to list species as endangered or threatened. Even if we subsequently list a candidate species, the early notice provided here could result in more options for species management and recovery by prompting candidate conservation measures to alleviate threats to the species. The CNOR summarizes the status and threats that we evaluated in order to determine that species qualify as candidates, to assign a listing priority number (LPN) to each species, and to determine whether a species should be removed from candidate status.