DOCSLIB.ORG

Lok Sabha Debates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lok Sabha Debates )LIWK6HULHV9RO;9,,,1R 7KXUVGD\$XJXVW 6UDYDQD 6DND /2.6$%+$'(%$7(6 )LIWK6HVVLRQ )LIWK/RN6DEKD /2.6$%+$6(&5(7$5,$7 1(:'(/+, CONTENTS Ato. 13— Thursday, August 17, im/Sravana 26,1894 (Saka) Columns O n! Answers to Questions-* ♦Stsit'd Question* Nos. 241 to 245, 248,250 and 251 1—40 Short Notice Question No. 2 30—41 Written Answen to Questions— Staffed Questions Not. 246. 247, 249 and 252 to * 0 . m ~ $ 2 Unstarred Questions Nos. 2380 to 2392, 2394 to 2412, 2415 to 2444, 2446 to 2456, 2458 to 2494, 2496 to 1510. 2512 to 2521, 2523 to 2&I* 2540 to 2546 and 2548 to 2579. 51—1*8 Calling Attention to Matter of Urgent Public Importance—* Reported Smuggling of foreign watches etc. by scare European Consular officials in Calcutta. 189—92 Laid on the Table : 1&—94 m ag es from Rajya Sabha 194 jcioria Memorial (Amendment) Bill— Aa passed fay Rajya Sabha 194 Central Sales Tax 'Amendment) BID— Report of Sclect Committee and Evidence 194— 5 Bills Introduced »— fl) Wiki Utp (Protection) Bill 195 (ii) Seeds (Amendment) Bill 195 Constitution (Thirtieth Amendment) Bill— 196-27 ShrifrJLGofcbale 196-98, 224 -32 . 199—204 niastga-hmwted q u ts tia n ^ itlnMMh Wat yk>i / " m i R. V, _ _ _ .2074-#"; Shri A. K. Spn ). K. Panda ri R. 0 . Bhandare ' I f 6*—18 v Sj|ri Shyamnandan Mishra Shri Dinesh Chandra Goswami 2 2 1 ^ 3 , J$hri G, Viswanathan 2fi&~24 Clauses 2, 3 and 1 m—ioj Motion to Pass 262 j lncoire Tax (Amendment) Bill. 1972- Motion to consider 270—76 Shri K. Baladhandayutham ZHk-72 Shri K. ft. Ganesh m * Clauses 2 to 6 and 1 27 ^ • -1 Motion to Pass 274 Shri Shivnath Singh 274—-75^ Shri K. R. Ganesh 276 public Debt (Amendment) Bill— Motion to consider M! '■i'-.swhflk Shri K. R. Ganesh . vv ' - • ** v, Shri Dasaratha Deb , ■ ;.’ > % . J ShH K. M. Madhukar ■/, |?;'y:y Shri JL Narayana Rao ■ Shri C. T. Dhandapani Clauses 2 to 5 and 1 ,v;. ........... Vi- ■■■ ?** <«?) ooua*N* Shri K. R. Ganesh ... ... 282 Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill— Motion to consider, as reported by Select Committee ................ 282—316 Shu Yeshwantrao Chavan .............. 2ft?— ftfl Shri Virendra Aggarwal .............. , 288—91 Shri B. R. Shukla ... ... 291*-$!$ Shn Dasaratha Deb ............... 295—98 Shri G Viswanathan ................ 299—301 Shri K. Baladhandayutham ... ... 301—06 Shri K. Natayana Rao ............... 307— 10 S htlC M. Stephen ................ 310—14 Shri Satpal Kapur ... ... 314—1$ LOK SABHA DEBATES I « 2 LOK SABHA THE MINISTER OF LABOUR AND REHABILITATION (SHRIR.JC. KHADIL- Thursday, August 17 . I9?2]Sravana 26 * / M KAR): The question is about industrial rein* (JkoM tions law and we contemplate bringing for ward a Bill on the basis of the recommend** tions of the National Labour Commission. We placed it before the tripartite body, the TV LoAr SaMa met at Eleven of the last national labour conference. The three Clock national trade un4ons met together as a group and they have submitted their agree­ fMR SPFAKtR in the Chair} ment On (hat basts we are bringing for* ward that legislation. As for the second part, we are in consulation with the State ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS Labour Ministers and 1 think I should be able to introduce legislation m the next Bill on Industrial Relations session. *241. SHRI C. T. DHANDAPANI ; SHRI B. V. NAItC : Is that Bill going Will the Minister of LABOUR AND to be only bilateral relationship between REHABILITATION be pleased to state : labour and capital or between labour and management ? Are you alto going to consider (a) whether all the Labour Trade Union's the points of view of the consumers whe­ have been consulted with regard to the ther individual or collective or group 9 introduction of the Industrial Relations Will lhe consumers’ point of view be taktn Bill; and up as part of the industrial relationship ? (b) if so, what were their views ? SHRI R. K, KHADILKAR: Every time we take up this question of industrial THE DEPUTY MINISTER IN THE relationship, we keep in ntmd the probable MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND RFHA effect that it will have on the consumers. BILITATION (SHRI BALOOVIND Beyond that there is no special organisation VERMA) ; (a) and (b). The proposed whom we could consult. comprehensive Industrial Relations law Will take into account the various views sft JV l <Wf VWW t expressed during protracted consultations, witfe the trade unions and others, that have w w t I Pit * r $ n «t*t «rr<flro art taken place since the Government received farcaW f | & n firtrc v x n r * the report of the National Commission on *ftr jrwrro aw* t«w *r «rf fin* w* Labour. « rw f t f mprt Wffm f aft SHRI C t . DHANDAPANI : Every tmVnW W\ f ft flWfi WmW body knows the slat* of industrial rela* tfems *nd the number of man-day* lost due Ww?w w wfpc wt f i to lack of understanding between she management and t^ n y s c * . What Irw ?fW tnY|t fW l TfF VT at*c#teactton b t y m m & b t y I M l j w f t . w i f f 1 1 *ir*f m A intnnd ^hen nr# they goh* to implement Hm mun^inrti I qp*» nQ+'tit # mftarftow .3 Ore&Atmten Orai Ammrs '"4'. : orgamsBtkffls . with eertata j»o* ■ ■ ■ blems ■; '4ft ■. becausethere' is': < |o iiit;;W»! £*.■' ■ ■ m r . s p e a k e r i ■ make a speech. :.'■ So far as '. tta imposed legislation is concerned* we SHRI R. K. KHADILKAR : T!w tWce Consult the three national trade union national trade union centres have formed a eeritres along with the employees’ organise* Council of Trade U*ioas. Through that, ■ ' Govts. About the first they can take i^ 'M rm te ,.. ■; jMdt'' I would assure him approach the Government. So far * i rising %ihat:;Wr-aire consulting the State Labour prices and other causes for industrial ^ l ^ t e r s and all the recommendations, as discontent are concerned, we deal with them ' made by the National separately. This is not a form for dealing Lab^ur Gommission will be given effect to* with individual problems. ’■''lusejping' in view the general consensus that we have arrived at. SHRI S. M. BANERJEE : What about the demand for wage rise and bonus ? : (t j w w WWW : ,5ft TOT VT SHRI A. P. SHARMA : Industrial arm i ^«r® «p» % relations do not deal with wages and bonus. '■■m. wm w*r? *t % fiwrcf m w SHRI R. K. KHADILKAR : That is ';fo s 3 ?WI%W>r 5i ? right. Industrial relations law does not deal with wage structure and bojius. SHRI R .K . KHADILKAR : That is not one of the three national trade union MR. SPEAKER : You do not recognise centres. Certainly I talk with their leaders the Chair. He does not recognise the but not as an organisation. Chair. What am I to do ? Kindly have a took at sie also; SHRI A. P. SHARMA : It is gratifying to note that the minister has consulted the SHRI R.K. KHADILKAR : Y*s, Sis, three; national trade union centres* as he calls them. May I know whether this SHRI M. RAM GOPAL REDDY : It Industrial Relations Bill is also going to is gratifying that the Labour Minister is affect the lakhs of Central Government consulting the labour organisations before employees and may I know whom he is enacting laws. Will he advise the other going toconsult about them. ministries also to consult the otl^ker interests at the time of enacting laws ? SHRI R. K. KHADILKAR : Central Government employees are governed ' MR. SPEAKER : Please be relevant to separately under the JCM. ThHr machinery this question. ■■■. a/: ly for Consultation is different. They are by convention not governed by industrial law. ' taftf yfr ftmfrrw i * ' f ir t• f ■ “wertt I : Wijtnt • "ztnt ( * 15 ;J . : It appears' W ?fhr 9WF#«r from the answcr tha he will ba able to intro* ?TT*T $ «WrytT V? WmTO $ fWJ Wf* ■V; 1811; ,' next' session. In . the v t o going to -be- » fast f t wm r 9 hft | ? trfir ft, «ft w ft w detcmration Industrial; relations in fWfir t w w wr swif ( .? the country because of the rising prices and: : f ' wage1 rise . .SHRI a . i t . JLHAJMLitAR and bopus. In the intervening period* is Mwdoor Santh h u Mw l<wlBri «aN»»*B« he going to convene any meeting of the t a s m i ^..Tbv; *m. central trade union organisations atid other strength. ■'■■■*' S th t tM n m * SRAVANA Z6.1894 (SAXA) Onl AMwert $ .;Wt;: b ea sk e d in ■ provocative manner, t h i t : ■ fceift. ;■ i Is aotgood. Do not provoke. them. Then it will be a headache which is transferred C&romcTce has made a quietly tit down and I have ment that the «treochment hw been m«ch : ;; ^'■■■; :^v:v,;; o. ; biggerbecause o fth e - ways for the last .to'ijN ^^:-'- P* M. MEHTA : As*mic*bte ore from .mine: site; for ■■■ exjxwt ■ * i a ■: relationship between the management and and the shortfail "wgsC one ; in the puWic aestor: during 1970*71 and 1971-72 1 If undertakings of this country, dothe govern* far this statemcnt is true ? i^p» raent propose to have strict application of have been taken - in- this regard ? thiskjpWatfc» to the public sector under­ takings? ' / :;. SHRI SHAHNAWAZ fli;1 i ■ true that the raU ways had ha vesomedifficul- SHRI R.K , fcHAmtKAR : Industial ty in moving the iron ore from thearea for law wit) Apply topublic sector undertakings export vig Paradip.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mark Davies Editor
    Mark Davies Editor Agents Alice Dunne Assistant +44 (0) 20 3214 0949 Flora Line [email protected] Credits Film Production Company Notes HOME ALONE 20th Century Studios / Dir: Dan Mazer 2021 Disney+ Prod: Hutch Parker, Jeremiah Samuels, Dan Wilson with Rob Delaney, Aisling Bea, Kenan Thompson THE EXCHANGE Who's On First Films Dir: Dan Mazer 2021 Prod: Simon Horsman, Jeffrey Soros, Dan Hine (with Ed Oxenbould) BORAT SUBSEQUENT Four by Two Films / Amazon Dir: Jason Woliner MOVIEFILM Prod: Sacha Baron Cohen, Monica 2020 Levinson, Anthony Hines EVERYBODY'S TALKING Warp / Film 4 / New Regency / Additonal editing ABOUT JAMIE 20th Century Studios Dir: Jonathan Butterell 2020 Prod: Barry Ryan, Mark Herbert, Peter Carlton (with Max Harwood, Lauren Patel, Richard E. Grant, Sharon Horgan, Sarah Lancashire) United Agents | 12-26 Lexington Street London W1F OLE | T +44 (0) 20 3214 0800 | F +44 (0) 20 3214 0801 | E [email protected] Production Company Notes SUPERVIZED Merlin Films Dir: Steve Barron 2019 Prods: Steve Barron & Kieran Corrigan (with Hiran Abeysekera, Elya Baskin & Tom Berenger) DORA AND THE LOST Paramount Pictures Additional editing CITY OF GOLD Dir: James Bobin Prod: Kristin Burr (with 2019 Isabela Moner, Benicio Del Toro, Michael Peña, Eva Longoria) LONDON FIELDS Muse Films / Hero Films As Consultant Editor 2015 Dir: Matthew Cullen Prods:Jordan Gertner & Chris Hanley (with Billy Bob Thornton, Amber Heard and Johnny Depp) MAY THE BEST MAN What If It Barks Dir:Andrew O’Connor WIN Films/MGM/Orion Pictures Prods:Lee Hupfield, Ray Marshall, 2014 Andrew O'Connor and Matthew Robinson (with Rosa Salazar, Whitmer Thomas and Drew Tarver) **Official Selection SXSW Film Festival Austin Tx** ALAN PARTRIDGE: Baby Cow Films Additional editing ALPHA PAPA Dir: Declan Lowney 2013 Prods: Kevin Loader and Henry Normal (with Steve Coogan, Nigel Lindsay, Colm Meaney and Karl Theobald) Television Production Company Notes MAN VS.
    [Show full text]
  • Karas Admits Plot to Kill Wife on Tape Husband: 'We Did It
    Co-defendant cops plea in city murder case, B1 GREATER RED BANK EATONTOWN No goose eggs Three for the arts LONG BRANCH Gossage loses lead: Red Bank Regional .hires Yanks lose in 14. dance, drama teachers. Today's Forecast: Sunny, cooler by tomorrow Page B3 Page B1 Complete wathor on A2 KtJH The Daily Register VOL. 106 NO. 44 YOUR HOMETOWN NEWSPAPER . SINCE 1878 TUESDAY, AUGUST 23,1983 . 25 CENTS Karas admits plot to kill wife on tape Husband: 'We did it. We both did it.' By JO ASTRID GLADING terday, Karas listened and followed the dialogue in a transcript supplied FREEHOLD - Walter Karas by Chaiet. admitted to plotting his wife's During the taped meeting, Wil- murder in a tape-recorded meeting liams shunned Karas' efforts to with his ex-girlfriend in late May, touch her and said, "Yeah, Walter, and a Superior Court judge ruled I mean, you says to me the only way yesterday that most of the tape can I can marry you is if Anne's dead. be used as evidence in the couple's You lied to me." Karas retorted, October trial. "No, I'd never lie to you. Don't "We. We did it. We both did it. ever say that." We both actively (expletive deleted) Superior Court Judge John A. did it, you know," Karas says on the Ricciardi ruled that the tapes meet tape to his former lover, Mary the criteria of audibility and con- Claire Williams, referring to the tinuity, despite several inaudible 1982 murder of Anne S. Karas. portions.
    [Show full text]
  • News Clips for Marie Colvin
    News Clips For Marie Colvin TRIBUTES ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 New York Times Blog: Tributes for Journalists Killed in Syrian Conflict ........................................................... 2 The Guardian: David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Rupert Murdoch pay tribute to Marie Colvin ....................... 3 The Guardian: Sunday Times editor pays tribute to Marie Colvin .................................................................... 4 Huffington Post: Marie Colvin Dead: Rupert Murdoch Pays Tribute To Veteran War Reporter ....................... 5 CNN.com: Amanpour: Marie Colvin shone light on victims .............................................................................. 6 BBC News: Jim Muir's tribute to Marie Colvin .................................................................................................. 8 The New Age: British PM pays tribute to journalist slain in Syria ................................................................... 10 The Telegraph: Marie Colvin killed in Homs: tributes to Sunday Times journalist .......................................... 10 The Daily Beast: Marie Colvin, My Courageous Friend .................................................................................. 12 The New Yorker: Postscript: Marie Colvin, 1956-2012 ................................................................................... 12 The Times: Marie Colvin: Resourceful and courageous
    [Show full text]
  • Made Outside of London Programme Titles Register 2013
    Made Outside of London programme titles register 2013 Publication date: 22th October 2014 1 Background 1.1 Section 286 of the Communications Act 2003 requires that Channels 3 and 5 each produce a suitable proportion, range and value of programmes outside of the M25. Channel 4 faces a similar obligation under Section 288. 1.2 This document sets out the titles of programmes that the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5 certified were ‘Made outside of London’ (MOL) productions broadcast during 2013. The name of the production company responsible for the programme is also included where relevant. Wherever this column is empty the programme was produced in-house by the broadcaster. 1.3 Further information from Ofcom on how it monitors regional production can be found here. 1.4 The three criteria under which a programme can qualify as MOL are: 1.4.1 The production company must have a substantive business and production base in the UK outside the M25. A base will be taken to be substantive if it is the usual place of employment of executives managing the regional business, of senior personnel involved in the production in question, and of senior personnel involved in seeking programme commissions – ‘Location’ in the data set out in this register below; 1.4.2 At least 70% of the production budget (excluding the cost of on-screen talent, archive material, sports rights, competition prize-money and copyright costs) must be spent in the UK outside the M25 – ‘Spend’ in the data set out in this register below; and 1.4.3 At least 50% of the production talent (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Media in Public Interest Litigation the PILS Project the Clayton Hotel, 22 Ormeau Avenue, Belfast
    25th May 2017 Niall Murphy The role of the Media in Public Interest Litigation The PILS Project The Clayton Hotel, 22 Ormeau Avenue, Belfast INTRODUCTION I am a partner in KRW Law LLP, a mixed legal practice whose portfolio includes criminal defence work and public law with an emphasis on human rights specifically in relation to the Legacy of the Conflict through challenges to the decisions of public authorities and through civil litigation. We consider that our work in this regard, although motivated by private instructions is overwhelmingly in the public interest, on behalf of a society emerging from an entrenched and generational conflict. We also conduct extensive engagements on behalf of our clients with those mechanisms currently constituting the Package of Measures, as agreed with the Committee of Ministers of the European Union (CoM) following the McKerr groups of judgments of the ECtHR, including Police Ombudsman, the PSNI HET, PSNI LIB and the Legacy inquest system. The persistent recognition/perception of our jurisdiction as ‘a state of exception’ demands that access to justice be secured and that legal challenges to public authority decisions, expressed through powers and policies, and through civil litigation private law claims, be pursued as a right, in the absence of a human rights compliant mechanism to satisfactorily investigate the Legacy of the Conflict on behalf of the relatives of the victims and those who survived. We are approached and instructed because litigation and the judgments and orders of the judiciary serve to fill the void in the absence of human right compliant mechanism to investigate the Legacy of the Conflict and to deliver truth, justice and accountability out-with any particular narrative endorsement from a political constituency and out-with a hierarchy of victims or hierarchy of perpetrators.
    [Show full text]