sign in sign up
<<
Home , Hereditary monarchy, Monarch, Monarchy, Royal Family, The Crown

Topic: Should the British be abolished? Facts:  The is the Head of and has many representational or ceremonial functions, e.g. the State Opening of .  However, the power to make and pass resides with Parliament as the elected legislative.  The monarch is, among other functions, the Head of the Church of , the Head of the Armed Forces and the Fountain of Justice. However, in these functions (s)he always has to act on the advice of e.g. the Prime , other ministers or a church commission.  The monarch gives a weekly audience to the Prime Minister in which (s)he has the right and the duty to discuss current matters.

Data extracted from: https://www.royal.uk/, The Independent; ; The Independent (2) pro con o All the Prime Ministers since the 1950s have valued the weekly audiences with the Queen o The monarch does not really have any real as a unique opportunity to discuss political power. Her/his functions are mainly government matters outside a party formal and could easily be taken over by environment with a person who can draw on other political bodies or an elected president. a wealth of experience and political knowledge. o The monarch is seen as someone who o Britain is a , which stands above party and can thus act means that the successor to the will as a real representative of the take the regardless of his/her regardless of short-term political interests suitability, character, previous scandals etc. and strategies. o In a modern democratic state the should also be able to exercise democratic control of the head of the . This o As a consequence, the monarch is seen as includes both electing the as a nonpolitical figure symbolizing Britishness well as instruments to check or even and national values. impeach him/her. None of this applies if the head of state is a hereditary monarch. o The monarchy would not work as a kind of o The British monarchy has shown that it is constitutional barrier against a . able to reform itself and adapt to modern The monarchy simply would not have (e.g. the Queen and Charles political power to stop a potential dictator (or have been paying de-facto since 1993; may not even want to – it is a fact that Prince Charles was allowed to marry a Edward VIII was sympathetic to Hitler and divorced woman etc.) National ). o The Queen may be the most expensive o The British is the most expensive monarch in , but this does not mean monarch in Europe (£40m per year). In that a president would come any cheaper. comparison, the Spanish monarchy costs The most expensive head of state in Europe £6.15m. pays £11.6m for their is the French president with £103.5m – more monarchy. than twice as expensive as the British monarchy! o The per capita cost of the monarchy rises dramatically if you include "hidden costs" (like £100m for Royal security) recorded in other parts of the budget. Everything o The positive image of the British monarchy included, the cost of the monarchy would around the world helps to secure trade come out at £11.24 per year and per deals, especially when they are made in the taxpayer. Now that the government has wake of a Royal visit. agreed to foot the bill for a £396m renovation of Buckingham , the taxpayer funding of the is set to soar by up to 66%. o Although the Queen is the third wealthiest o With the new of Prince William, monarch in Europe the monarchy still Kate and babies George and Charlotte, the receives public funding. Public funding also monarchy has gathered new momentum and includes less important relatives of the enjoys widespread sympathy in Britain. Queen. o Although many members of the Royal o The members of the Royal Family have Family head charities they do not really important functions heading all kinds of engage in practical work for those charities charities. Their image and popularity help but rather serve as a kind of . charities to continue their good work. www.englisch-bw.de – Sprechen – Kommunikationsprüfung – Themen für die Kommunikationsprüfung