DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:Physics/0002019 9 Feb 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:Physics/0002019 9 Feb 2000 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server ON M THEORY, QUANTUM PARADOXES AND THE NEW RELATIVITY Carlos Castro Center for Theoretical Studies of Physical Systems Clark Atlanta University Atlanta, GA. 30314 Alex Granik DepartmentofPhysics University of the Paci c Sto ckton, California 95211 January 2000 Dedicated to the memory of Leonard Ainsworth, a true pioneer and a scientist Abstract Recently a New Relativity Principle has b een prop osed by one of the authors as the underlying physical and geometrical foundations of String and M Theory. It is explicitly shown that within the framework of the New Relativity Theory, some Quantum Mechanical Paradoxes like the Einstein-Rosen Po dolsky and the Black Hole Information Loss, are easily resolved. Such New Relativity Theory requires the intro duction of an In nite Dimensional Quantum Spacetime as has b een shown recently by one of us. This can b e viewed as just another way of lo oking at Feynman's path integral formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Instead of having an in nite dimensional funcional integral over al l paths, smo oth, forwards and backwards in time, random and fractal, in a nite-dimensional spacetime, one has a nite numb er of paths in an In nite Dimensional Quantum Spacetime. We present a few-lines pro of why there is no such a thing as an EPR Paradoxin this New Relativity theory. The reason is not due to a sup erluminal information sp eed but to a divergent information charge density. In the in nite dimensional limit, due to the prop erties of gamma functions, the hyp ervolume enclosed byaD -dim hyp ersphere, of nite nonzero radius, shrinks to zero : to a hyp erp oint , the in nite-dimensional analog af a p oint. For this reason, Information ows through the in nite-dimensional hyp ersurface of nonzero radius, but zero size, the hyp erp oint, in an instant. In this fashion weimbue an abstract mathematical "p oint" with a true physical meaning : it is an entity in in nite dimensions that has zero hyp ervolume at nonzero radius . A plausible resolution of the Information Loss Paradox in Black Holes is prop osed. 1. Intro duction : Historical background arXiv:physics/0002019 9 Feb 2000 From the very b eginning the relativity principle has b een one of the cornerstones of mechanics. In 1686 , in the op ening pages of P r incipia, Newton wrote : " I do not de ne time, space, place, and motion, as b eing well known to all. Only I must observe, that the common p eople conceive those quantities under no other notions but from the relations they b ear to sensible ob jects ". Based on this preamble, Newton intro duced the absolute space, time, and motion which in his own words do not b ear " relation to anything external " . It is clear that such absolute space, time, motion, are purely metaphysical notions, stand outside the realm of physics, and serve the purp ose of " geometrization " of physical phenomena. Thus at the foundations of Newtonian mechanics lie the ab ove metaphyisical concepts. The very same Metaphysical concepts that so many memb ers of the scienti c community,by their own admission, are unwilling to accept. Much later, Mach rather broadly , and then Einstein de nitely, set Physics on physical ground by de ning measurements relative only to the physical phenomena, and not to the metaphysical entities. Instead of vaguely-de ned if at all metaphyiscal concepts of absolute space, time, and motion, new rather narrow but well de ned physical concepts of physical measurements had b een intro duced. The old "absolutes " had b een dismissed by Einstein's Theory of Relativity. Measurements required a universal standard which had b een furnished byaphysical quantity : the sp eed of light. Based on this historical p ersp ectiveweintro duce the New Relativity Principle [1] that rest on the four p ostulates presented in the next section. In the last sections an amazingly simple pro of is presented why there 1 is no EPR Paradox in such New Relativity Theory. In addition, a plausible resolution of the Information Loss in Black Holes is prop osed. 2. The Program of the New Relativity Principle : The Demolition of Today's Absolutes Recently one of the authors has prop osed that a New Relativity principle may b e op erating in Nature which could reveal imp ortant clues to nd the origins of M theory [1]. Wewere forced to intro duce this new Relativity principle, where all dimensions and signatures of spacetime are on the same fo oting, to nd a fully covariant formulation of the p-brane Quantum Mechanical Lo op Wave equations. This New Relativity Principle, or the principle of Polydimensional Covariance as has b een called byPezzaglia, has also b een crucial in the derivation of Papap etrou's equations of motion of a spinning particle in curved spaces that was a long standing problem which lasted almost 50 years [2]. A Cli ord calculus was used where all the equations were written in terms of Cli ord-valued multivector quantities; i.e one had to abandon the use of vectors and tensors and replace them by Cli ord-algebra valued quantities, matrices, for example . The New Relativity Theory [1] rests on four p ostulates : 1. The old Bo otstrap Idea of Chew : Each p-brane is made of all the others. To view a single p-brane as a fundamental identity is a meaningless concept. p-branes are de ned only in relation to others. This is Mach's principle once again. For this reason, one must include all dimensions and signatures on the same fo oting. Pezzaglia [2] has called this the principle of Polydimensional Covariance or Dimensional Demo cracy. The New Relativity theory reshues, for example, a string history for a 5-brane history; a 9-brane history for a membrane history; an 11-brane history for a history encompassing all other p-branes...and so forth. Point and extended instantons and tensionless p-branes are also inlcluded. The tensionless p-brane history excitations of the in nite dimensional Quantum Spacetime are the " photons " in this New Relativity Theory. We honestly b elieve that M Theory do es not stand for mystery, membrane, matrix, master, mother, murky,Moyal....it stands for Mach. The New Relativity theory is based on the ultimate Machian view of the Quantum Universe the Ultimate Machian " Quantum Computer " : Relationships among entities are the only meaningful statements one can make . A p erfect example of this are : spin-networks, quantum- networks, quantum sets, cellular networks, p-Adic Physics,...etc. Since it is undesirable to run o the letters of the alphab et, bykeep adding letters like M ; F ; S::: Theory,we gather courage to say that by abandoning the Ego centric Anthrop omorphic view of the Universe and, instead, embracing Mach's view that everything in the Quantum Universe is interconnected, one reaches the end of the alphab et at Z theory : Z stands for the ultimate Machian view of the Quantum Universe that dismisses the ego centric view of the Universe for a Z enthr opic Quantum Universe. Who are we to say that we knoweverything that an electron , a photon, a quark really " sees " ? Do electrons, quarks....p erform Feynman diagrams ? Has anyone seen a p oint? 2. Laurent Nottale's Scale-Relativity theory [3]. In the nal analysis, Physics involves, and is ab out, measurements. Physics is an exp erimental science. Physics deals with exp eriences. On the other hand to measure something one needs a standard of measure- ment to compare measurements with. It is essential , it is of prime imp ortance, to intro duce resolutions in Physics. It is meaningless to say that the one has a eld at x.Byx meaning : sp ecifying the value of the real number x to an in nite numb er of non-p erio dic decimal places. In mathematics we can in nitely increase the accuracy or degree of resolution at will of any real number by adding digits. However, in practice we cannot have such arbitrary accuracy provided by mathematical constructions. Even writing an in nite ap erio dic decimal fraction would require an in nite amount of memory. Therefore, in Physics, it is necessary to have a nite universal physical "yardstick" whichwould de ne the ultimate Physical Resolution. Nottale's Scale Realtivity takes the Planck scale as such Universal physical standard of measurement that is invariant, by de nition, under Scale Relativistic transformations of resolutions, like the sp eed of lightwas in Einstein's Relativity. p-adic numb ers and p-adic Physics is a nice attempt to eliminate the problem of having to sp ecify a real numb er up to in nite digits [11]. The Planck scale is therefore taken as that universal standard of measure invariant under Scale Relativistic transformations of resolutions . In the same vein that the sp eed of light was taken by Einstein as the maximum sp eed in Nature, the Planck scale is taken to b e the minimum length. The sp eed of light allowed Einstein to embrace space with time, since space and time have di erent units. 2 By the same token, to embrace all dimensions one needs a Universal length scale in all dimensions : the Planck Scale. As the years pass by, more and more planets have b een found con rming Nottale's predictions within his framework of Scale-Relativity. Instead of b eing prop erly rewarded with increased curiosity and interest in his remarkable theory, he has b een increasingly rewarded with insults and a su o cating censorship [12].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Atomic Physics Perspective on the New Kilogram Defined by Planck's Constant
    An atomic physics perspective on the new kilogram defined by Planck’s constant (Wolfgang Ketterle and Alan O. Jamison, MIT) (Manuscript submitted to Physics Today) On May 20, the kilogram will no longer be defined by the artefact in Paris, but through the definition1 of Planck’s constant h=6.626 070 15*10-34 kg m2/s. This is the result of advances in metrology: The best two measurements of h, the Watt balance and the silicon spheres, have now reached an accuracy similar to the mass drift of the ur-kilogram in Paris over 130 years. At this point, the General Conference on Weights and Measures decided to use the precisely measured numerical value of h as the definition of h, which then defines the unit of the kilogram. But how can we now explain in simple terms what exactly one kilogram is? How do fixed numerical values of h, the speed of light c and the Cs hyperfine frequency νCs define the kilogram? In this article we give a simple conceptual picture of the new kilogram and relate it to the practical realizations of the kilogram. A similar change occurred in 1983 for the definition of the meter when the speed of light was defined to be 299 792 458 m/s. Since the second was the time required for 9 192 631 770 oscillations of hyperfine radiation from a cesium atom, defining the speed of light defined the meter as the distance travelled by light in 1/9192631770 of a second, or equivalently, as 9192631770/299792458 times the wavelength of the cesium hyperfine radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Units and Magnitudes (Lecture Notes)
    physics 8.701 topic 2 Frank Wilczek Units and Magnitudes (lecture notes) This lecture has two parts. The first part is mainly a practical guide to the measurement units that dominate the particle physics literature, and culture. The second part is a quasi-philosophical discussion of deep issues around unit systems, including a comparison of atomic, particle ("strong") and Planck units. For a more extended, profound treatment of the second part issues, see arxiv.org/pdf/0708.4361v1.pdf . Because special relativity and quantum mechanics permeate modern particle physics, it is useful to employ units so that c = ħ = 1. In other words, we report velocities as multiples the speed of light c, and actions (or equivalently angular momenta) as multiples of the rationalized Planck's constant ħ, which is the original Planck constant h divided by 2π. 27 August 2013 physics 8.701 topic 2 Frank Wilczek In classical physics one usually keeps separate units for mass, length and time. I invite you to think about why! (I'll give you my take on it later.) To bring out the "dimensional" features of particle physics units without excess baggage, it is helpful to keep track of powers of mass M, length L, and time T without regard to magnitudes, in the form When these are both set equal to 1, the M, L, T system collapses to just one independent dimension. So we can - and usually do - consider everything as having the units of some power of mass. Thus for energy we have while for momentum 27 August 2013 physics 8.701 topic 2 Frank Wilczek and for length so that energy and momentum have the units of mass, while length has the units of inverse mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Forest Aboveground Biomass and Uncertainties By
    Urbazaev et al. Carbon Balance Manage (2018) 13:5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0093-5 RESEARCH Open Access Estimation of forest aboveground biomass and uncertainties by integration of feld measurements, airborne LiDAR, and SAR and optical satellite data in Mexico Mikhail Urbazaev1,2* , Christian Thiel1, Felix Cremer1, Ralph Dubayah3, Mirco Migliavacca4, Markus Reichstein4 and Christiane Schmullius1 Abstract Background: Information on the spatial distribution of aboveground biomass (AGB) over large areas is needed for understanding and managing processes involved in the carbon cycle and supporting international policies for climate change mitigation and adaption. Furthermore, these products provide important baseline data for the development of sustainable management strategies to local stakeholders. The use of remote sensing data can provide spatially explicit information of AGB from local to global scales. In this study, we mapped national Mexican forest AGB using satellite remote sensing data and a machine learning approach. We modelled AGB using two scenarios: (1) extensive national forest inventory (NFI), and (2) airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) as reference data. Finally, we propagated uncertainties from feld measurements to LiDAR-derived AGB and to the national wall-to-wall forest AGB map. Results: The estimated AGB maps (NFI- and LiDAR-calibrated) showed similar goodness-of-ft statistics (R­ 2, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)) at three diferent scales compared to the independent validation data set. We observed diferent spatial patterns of AGB in tropical dense forests, where no or limited number of NFI data were available, with higher AGB values in the LiDAR-calibrated map. We estimated much higher uncertainties in the AGB maps based on two-stage up-scaling method (i.e., from feld measurements to LiDAR and from LiDAR-based estimates to satel- lite imagery) compared to the traditional feld to satellite up-scaling.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Accuracy of the Numerical Values of the Estimates Some Fundamental Physical Constants
    Improving the accuracy of the numerical values of the estimates some fundamental physical constants. Valery Timkov, Serg Timkov, Vladimir Zhukov, Konstantin Afanasiev To cite this version: Valery Timkov, Serg Timkov, Vladimir Zhukov, Konstantin Afanasiev. Improving the accuracy of the numerical values of the estimates some fundamental physical constants.. Digital Technologies, Odessa National Academy of Telecommunications, 2019, 25, pp.23 - 39. hal-02117148 HAL Id: hal-02117148 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02117148 Submitted on 2 May 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Improving the accuracy of the numerical values of the estimates some fundamental physical constants. Valery F. Timkov1*, Serg V. Timkov2, Vladimir A. Zhukov2, Konstantin E. Afanasiev2 1Institute of Telecommunications and Global Geoinformation Space of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Senior Researcher, Ukraine. 2Research and Production Enterprise «TZHK», Researcher, Ukraine. *Email: [email protected] The list of designations in the text: l
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full-Text
    International Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2021, 11(1): 29-59 DOI: 10.5923/j.ijtmp.20211101.03 Measurement Quantization Describes the Physical Constants Jody A. Geiger 1Department of Research, Informativity Institute, Chicago, IL, USA Abstract It has been a long-standing goal in physics to present a physical model that may be used to describe and correlate the physical constants. We demonstrate, this is achieved by describing phenomena in terms of Planck Units and introducing a new concept, counts of Planck Units. Thus, we express the existing laws of classical mechanics in terms of units and counts of units to demonstrate that the physical constants may be expressed using only these terms. But this is not just a nomenclature substitution. With this approach we demonstrate that the constants and the laws of nature may be described with just the count terms or just the dimensional unit terms. Moreover, we demonstrate that there are three frames of reference important to observation. And with these principles we resolve the relation of the physical constants. And we resolve the SI values for the physical constants. Notably, we resolve the relation between gravitation and electromagnetism. Keywords Measurement Quantization, Physical Constants, Unification, Fine Structure Constant, Electric Constant, Magnetic Constant, Planck’s Constant, Gravitational Constant, Elementary Charge ground state orbital a0 and mass of an electron me – both 1. Introduction measures from the 2018 CODATA – we resolve fundamental length l . And we continue with the resolution of We present expressions, their calculation and the f the gravitational constant G, Planck’s reduced constant ħ corresponding CODATA [1,2] values in Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Rational Dimensia
    Rational Dimensia R. Hanush Physics Phor Phun, Paso Robles, CA 93446∗ (Received) Rational Dimensia is a comprehensive examination of three questions: What is a dimension? Does direction necessarily imply dimension? Can all physical law be derived from geometric principles? A dimension is any physical quantity that can be measured. If space is considered as a single dimension with a plurality of directions, then the spatial dimension forms the second of three axes in a Dimensional Coordinate System (DCS); geometric units normalize unit vectors of time, space, and mass. In the DCS all orders n of any type of motion are subject to geometric analysis in the space- time plane. An nth-order distance formula can be derived from geometric and physical principles using only algebra, geometry, and trigonometry; the concept of the derivative is invoked but not relied upon. Special relativity, general relativity, and perihelion precession are shown to be geometric functions of velocity, acceleration, and jerk (first-, second-, and third-order Lorentz transformations) with v2 coefficients of n! = 1, 2, and 6, respectively. An nth-order Lorentz transformation is extrapolated. An exponential scaling of all DCS coordinate axes results in an ordered Periodic Table of Dimensions, a periodic table of elements for physics. Over 1600 measurement units are fitted to 72 elements; a complete catalog is available online at EPAPS. All physical law can be derived from geometric principles considering only a single direction in space, and direction is unique to the physical quantity of space, so direction does not imply dimension. I. INTRODUCTION analysis can be applied to all.
    [Show full text]
  • The ST System of Units Leading the Way to Unification
    The ST system of units Leading the way to unification © Xavier Borg B.Eng.(Hons.) - Blaze Labs Research First electronic edition published as part of the Unified Theory Foundations (Feb 2005) [1] Abstract This paper shows that all measurable quantities in physics can be represented as nothing more than a number of spatial dimensions differentiated by a number of temporal dimensions and vice versa. To convert between the numerical values given by the space-time system of units and the conventional SI system, one simply multiplies the results by specific dimensionless constants. Once the ST system of units presented here is applied to any set of physics parameters, one is then able to derive all laws and equations without reference to the original theory which presented said relationship. In other words, all known principles and numerical constants which took hundreds of years to be discovered, like Ohm's Law, energy mass equivalence, Newton's Laws, etc.. would simply follow naturally from the spatial and temporal dimensions themselves, and can be derived without any reference to standard theoretical background. Hundreds of new equations can be derived using the ST table included in this paper. The relation between any combination of physical parameters, can be derived at any instant. Included is a step by step worked example showing how to derive any free space constant and quantum constant. 1 Dimensions and dimensional analysis One of the most powerful mathematical tools in science is dimensional analysis. Dimensional analysis is often applied in different scientific fields to simplify a problem by reducing the number of variables to the smallest number of "essential" parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Constants and Units and the Search for Temporal Variations
    Lecture Notes for the Schladming Winter School "Masses and Constants" 2010. Published in Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 203-204, 18 (2010) 1 Fundamental constants and units and the search for temporal variations Ekkehard Peika aPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany This article reviews two aspects of the present research on fundamental constants: their use in a universal and precisely realizable system of units for metrology and the search for a conceivable temporal drift of the constants that may open an experimental window to new physics. 1. INTRODUCTION mainly focus on two examples: the unit of mass that is presently realized via an artefact that shall These lectures attempt to cover two active top- be replaced by a quantum definition based on fun- ics of research in the field of the fundamental con- damental constants and the unit of time, which stants whose motivations may seem to be discon- is exceptional in the accuracy to which time and nected or even opposed. On one hand there is a frequencies can be measured with atomic clocks. successful program in metrology to link the real- The second part will give a brief motivation for ization of the base units as closely as possible to the search for variations of constants, will re- the values of fundamental constants like the speed view some observations in geophysics and in as- of light c, the elementary charge e etc., because trophysics and will finally describe laboratory ex- such an approach promises to provide a univer- periments that make use of a new generation of sal and precise system for all measurements of highly precise atomic clocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Planck Dimensional Analysis of Big G
    Planck Dimensional Analysis of Big G Espen Gaarder Haug⇤ Norwegian University of Life Sciences July 3, 2016 Abstract This is a short note to show how big G can be derived from dimensional analysis by assuming that the Planck length [1] is much more fundamental than Newton’s gravitational constant. Key words: Big G, Newton, Planck units, Dimensional analysis, Fundamental constants, Atomism. 1 Dimensional Analysis Haug [2, 3, 4] has suggested that Newton’s gravitational constant (Big G) [5] can be written as l2c3 G = p ¯h Writing the gravitational constant in this way helps us to simplify and quantify a long series of equations in gravitational theory without changing the value of G, see [3]. This also enables us simplify the Planck units. We can find this G by solving for the Planck mass or the Planck length with respect to G, as has already been done by Haug. We will claim that G is not anything physical or tangible and that the Planck length may be much more fundamental than the Newton’s gravitational constant. If we assume the Planck length is a more fundamental constant than G,thenwecanalsofindG through “traditional” dimensional analysis. Here we will assume that the speed of light c, the Planck length lp, and the reduced Planck constanth ¯ are the three fundamental constants. The dimensions of G and the three fundamental constants are L3 [G]= MT2 L2 [¯h]=M T L [c]= T [lp]=L Based on this, we have ↵ β γ G = lp c ¯h L3 L β L2 γ = L↵ M (1) MT2 T T ✓ ◆ ✓ ◆ Based on this, we obtain the following three equations Lenght : 3 = ↵ + β +2γ (2) Mass : 1=γ (3) − Time : 2= β γ (4) − − − ⇤e-mail [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Spaces Are Modular Arxiv:1606.01829V2 [Hep-Th]
    Quantum Spaces are Modular a b c Laurent Freidel, ∗ Robert G. Leigh y and Djordje Minic z a Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline St. N., Waterloo ON, N2L 2Y5, Canada b Department of Physics, University of Illinois, 1110 West Green St., Urbana IL 61801, U.S.A. c Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA 24061, U.S.A. November 7, 2016 Abstract At present, our notion of space is a classical concept. Taking the point of view that quantum theory is more fundamental than classical physics, and that space should be given a purely quantum definition, we revisit the notion of Euclidean space from the point of view of quantum mechanics. Since space appears in physics in the form of labels on relativistic fields or Schr¨odingerwave functionals, we propose to define Euclidean quantum space as a choice of polarization for the Heisenberg algebra of quantum theory. We show, following Mackey, that generically, such polarizations contain a fundamen- tal length scale and that contrary to what is implied by the Schr¨odingerpolarization, they possess topologically distinct spectra. These are the modular spaces. We show that they naturally come equipped with additional geometrical structures usually en- countered in the context of string theory or generalized geometry. Moreover, we show how modular space reconciles the presence of a fundamental scale with translation and rotation invariance. We also discuss how the usual classical notion of space comes out as a form of thermodynamical limit of modular space while the Schr¨odingerspace is a singular limit. The concept of classical space-time is one of the basic building blocks of physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclic Cosmology, Conformal Symmetry and the Metastability of the Higgs ∗ Itzhak Bars A, Paul J
    Physics Letters B 726 (2013) 50–55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Cyclic cosmology, conformal symmetry and the metastability of the Higgs ∗ Itzhak Bars a, Paul J. Steinhardt b,c, , Neil Turok d a Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0484, USA b California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA c Department of Physics and Princeton Center for Theoretical Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA d Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, ON N2L 2Y5, Canada article info abstract Article history: Recent measurements at the LHC suggest that the current Higgs vacuum could be metastable with a Received 31 July 2013 modest barrier (height (1010–12 GeV)4) separating it from a ground state with negative vacuum density Received in revised form 23 August 2013 of order the Planck scale. We note that metastability is problematic for standard bang cosmology but Accepted 26 August 2013 is essential for cyclic cosmology in order to end one cycle, bounce, and begin the next. In this Letter, Available online 2 September 2013 motivated by the approximate scaling symmetry of the standard model of particle physics and the Editor: M. Cveticˇ primordial large-scale structure of the universe, we use our recent formulation of the Weyl-invariant version of the standard model coupled to gravity to track the evolution of the Higgs in a regularly bouncing cosmology. We find a band of solutions in which the Higgs field escapes from the metastable phase during each big crunch, passes through the bang into an expanding phase, and returns to the metastable vacuum, cycle after cycle after cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics and Technology System of Units for Electrodynamics
    PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM OF UNITS FOR ELECTRODYNAMICS∗ M. G. Ivanov† Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology Dolgoprudny, Russia Abstract The contemporary practice is to favor the use of the SI units for electric circuits and the Gaussian CGS system for electromagnetic field. A modification of the Gaussian system of units (the Physics and Technology System) is suggested. In the Physics and Technology System the units of measurement for electrical circuits coincide with SI units, and the equations for the electromagnetic field are almost the same form as in the Gaussian system. The XXIV CGMP (2011) Resolution ¾On the possible future revision of the International System of Units, the SI¿ provides a chance to initiate gradual introduction of the Physics and Technology System as a new modification of the SI. Keywords: SI, International System of Units, electrodynamics, Physics and Technology System of units, special relativity. 1. Introduction. One and a half century dispute The problem of choice of units for electrodynamics dates back to the time of M. Faraday (1822–1831) and J. Maxwell (1861–1873). Electrodynamics acquired its final form only after geometrization of special relativity by H. Minkowski (1907–1909). The improvement of contemporary (4-dimentional relativistic covariant) formulation of electrodynamics and its implementation in practice of higher education stretched not less than a half of century. Overview of some systems of units, which are used in electrodynamics could be found, for example, in books [2, 3] and paper [4]. Legislation and standards of many countries recommend to use in science and education The International System of Units (SI).
    [Show full text]