View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server ON M THEORY, QUANTUM PARADOXES AND THE NEW RELATIVITY Carlos Castro Center for Theoretical Studies of Physical Systems Clark Atlanta University Atlanta, GA. 30314 Alex Granik DepartmentofPhysics University of the Paci c Sto ckton, California 95211 January 2000 Dedicated to the memory of Leonard Ainsworth, a true pioneer and a scientist Abstract Recently a New Relativity Principle has b een prop osed by one of the authors as the underlying physical and geometrical foundations of String and M Theory. It is explicitly shown that within the framework of the New Relativity Theory, some Quantum Mechanical Paradoxes like the Einstein-Rosen Po dolsky and the Black Hole Information Loss, are easily resolved. Such New Relativity Theory requires the intro duction of an In nite Dimensional Quantum Spacetime as has b een shown recently by one of us. This can b e viewed as just another way of lo oking at Feynman's path integral formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Instead of having an in nite dimensional funcional integral over al l paths, smo oth, forwards and backwards in time, random and fractal, in a nite-dimensional spacetime, one has a nite numb er of paths in an In nite Dimensional Quantum Spacetime. We present a few-lines pro of why there is no such a thing as an EPR Paradoxin this New Relativity theory. The reason is not due to a sup erluminal information sp eed but to a divergent information charge density. In the in nite dimensional limit, due to the prop erties of gamma functions, the hyp ervolume enclosed byaD -dim hyp ersphere, of nite nonzero radius, shrinks to zero : to a hyp erp oint , the in nite-dimensional analog af a p oint. For this reason, Information ows through the in nite-dimensional hyp ersurface of nonzero radius, but zero size, the hyp erp oint, in an instant. In this fashion weimbue an abstract mathematical "p oint" with a true physical meaning : it is an entity in in nite dimensions that has zero hyp ervolume at nonzero radius . A plausible resolution of the Information Loss Paradox in Black Holes is prop osed. 1. Intro duction : Historical background arXiv:physics/0002019 9 Feb 2000 From the very b eginning the relativity principle has b een one of the cornerstones of mechanics. In 1686 , in the op ening pages of P r incipia, Newton wrote : " I do not de ne time, space, place, and motion, as b eing well known to all. Only I must observe, that the common p eople conceive those quantities under no other notions but from the relations they b ear to sensible ob jects ". Based on this preamble, Newton intro duced the absolute space, time, and motion which in his own words do not b ear " relation to anything external " . It is clear that such absolute space, time, motion, are purely metaphysical notions, stand outside the realm of physics, and serve the purp ose of " geometrization " of physical phenomena. Thus at the foundations of Newtonian mechanics lie the ab ove metaphyisical concepts. The very same Metaphysical concepts that so many memb ers of the scienti c community,by their own admission, are unwilling to accept. Much later, Mach rather broadly , and then Einstein de nitely, set Physics on physical ground by de ning measurements relative only to the physical phenomena, and not to the metaphysical entities. Instead of vaguely-de ned if at all metaphyiscal concepts of absolute space, time, and motion, new rather narrow but well de ned physical concepts of physical measurements had b een intro duced. The old "absolutes " had b een dismissed by Einstein's Theory of Relativity. Measurements required a universal standard which had b een furnished byaphysical quantity : the sp eed of light. Based on this historical p ersp ectiveweintro duce the New Relativity Principle [1] that rest on the four p ostulates presented in the next section. In the last sections an amazingly simple pro of is presented why there 1 is no EPR Paradox in such New Relativity Theory. In addition, a plausible resolution of the Information Loss in Black Holes is prop osed. 2. The Program of the New Relativity Principle : The Demolition of Today's Absolutes Recently one of the authors has prop osed that a New Relativity principle may b e op erating in Nature which could reveal imp ortant clues to nd the origins of M theory [1]. Wewere forced to intro duce this new Relativity principle, where all dimensions and signatures of spacetime are on the same fo oting, to nd a fully covariant formulation of the p-brane Quantum Mechanical Lo op Wave equations. This New Relativity Principle, or the principle of Polydimensional Covariance as has b een called byPezzaglia, has also b een crucial in the derivation of Papap etrou's equations of motion of a spinning particle in curved spaces that was a long standing problem which lasted almost 50 years [2]. A Cli ord calculus was used where all the equations were written in terms of Cli ord-valued multivector quantities; i.e one had to abandon the use of vectors and tensors and replace them by Cli ord-algebra valued quantities, matrices, for example . The New Relativity Theory [1] rests on four p ostulates : 1. The old Bo otstrap Idea of Chew : Each p-brane is made of all the others. To view a single p-brane as a fundamental identity is a meaningless concept. p-branes are de ned only in relation to others. This is Mach's principle once again. For this reason, one must include all dimensions and signatures on the same fo oting. Pezzaglia [2] has called this the principle of Polydimensional Covariance or Dimensional Demo cracy. The New Relativity theory reshues, for example, a string history for a 5-brane history; a 9-brane history for a membrane history; an 11-brane history for a history encompassing all other p-branes...and so forth. Point and extended instantons and tensionless p-branes are also inlcluded. The tensionless p-brane history excitations of the in nite dimensional Quantum Spacetime are the " photons " in this New Relativity Theory. We honestly b elieve that M Theory do es not stand for mystery, membrane, matrix, master, mother, murky,Moyal....it stands for Mach. The New Relativity theory is based on the ultimate Machian view of the Quantum Universe the Ultimate Machian " Quantum Computer " : Relationships among entities are the only meaningful statements one can make . A p erfect example of this are : spin-networks, quantum- networks, quantum sets, cellular networks, p-Adic Physics,...etc. Since it is undesirable to run o the letters of the alphab et, bykeep adding letters like M ; F ; S::: Theory,we gather courage to say that by abandoning the Ego centric Anthrop omorphic view of the Universe and, instead, embracing Mach's view that everything in the Quantum Universe is interconnected, one reaches the end of the alphab et at Z theory : Z stands for the ultimate Machian view of the Quantum Universe that dismisses the ego centric view of the Universe for a Z enthr opic Quantum Universe. Who are we to say that we knoweverything that an electron , a photon, a quark really " sees " ? Do electrons, quarks....p erform Feynman diagrams ? Has anyone seen a p oint? 2. Laurent Nottale's Scale-Relativity theory [3]. In the nal analysis, Physics involves, and is ab out, measurements. Physics is an exp erimental science. Physics deals with exp eriences. On the other hand to measure something one needs a standard of measure- ment to compare measurements with. It is essential , it is of prime imp ortance, to intro duce resolutions in Physics. It is meaningless to say that the one has a eld at x.Byx meaning : sp ecifying the value of the real number x to an in nite numb er of non-p erio dic decimal places. In mathematics we can in nitely increase the accuracy or degree of resolution at will of any real number by adding digits. However, in practice we cannot have such arbitrary accuracy provided by mathematical constructions. Even writing an in nite ap erio dic decimal fraction would require an in nite amount of memory. Therefore, in Physics, it is necessary to have a nite universal physical "yardstick" whichwould de ne the ultimate Physical Resolution. Nottale's Scale Realtivity takes the Planck scale as such Universal physical standard of measurement that is invariant, by de nition, under Scale Relativistic transformations of resolutions, like the sp eed of lightwas in Einstein's Relativity. p-adic numb ers and p-adic Physics is a nice attempt to eliminate the problem of having to sp ecify a real numb er up to in nite digits [11]. The Planck scale is therefore taken as that universal standard of measure invariant under Scale Relativistic transformations of resolutions . In the same vein that the sp eed of light was taken by Einstein as the maximum sp eed in Nature, the Planck scale is taken to b e the minimum length. The sp eed of light allowed Einstein to embrace space with time, since space and time have di erent units. 2 By the same token, to embrace all dimensions one needs a Universal length scale in all dimensions : the Planck Scale. As the years pass by, more and more planets have b een found con rming Nottale's predictions within his framework of Scale-Relativity. Instead of b eing prop erly rewarded with increased curiosity and interest in his remarkable theory, he has b een increasingly rewarded with insults and a su o cating censorship [12].