AVIS Ce Document a Été Numérisé Par La Division De La Gestion Des

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AVIS Ce Document a Été Numérisé Par La Division De La Gestion Des Direction des bibliothèques AVIS Ce document a été numérisé par la Division de la gestion des documents et des archives de l’Université de Montréal. L’auteur a autorisé l’Université de Montréal à reproduire et diffuser, en totalité ou en partie, par quelque moyen que ce soit et sur quelque support que ce soit, et exclusivement à des fins non lucratives d’enseignement et de recherche, des copies de ce mémoire ou de cette thèse. L’auteur et les coauteurs le cas échéant conservent la propriété du droit d’auteur et des droits moraux qui protègent ce document. Ni la thèse ou le mémoire, ni des extraits substantiels de ce document, ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement reproduits sans l’autorisation de l’auteur. Afin de se conformer à la Loi canadienne sur la protection des renseignements personnels, quelques formulaires secondaires, coordonnées ou signatures intégrées au texte ont pu être enlevés de ce document. Bien que cela ait pu affecter la pagination, il n’y a aucun contenu manquant. NOTICE This document was digitized by the Records Management & Archives Division of Université de Montréal. The author of this thesis or dissertation has granted a nonexclusive license allowing Université de Montréal to reproduce and publish the document, in part or in whole, and in any format, solely for noncommercial educational and research purposes. The author and co-authors if applicable retain copyright ownership and moral rights in this document. Neither the whole thesis or dissertation, nor substantial extracts from it, may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author’s permission. In compliance with the Canadian Privacy Act some supporting forms, contact information or signatures may have been removed from the document. While this may affect the document page count, it does not represent any loss of content from the document. Université de Montréal Origin of Symphyotricltum anticostense (Asteraceae: Astereae), an endemic species of the Gulf of St. Lawrence par Jami! Vaezi Département de Sciences biologiques Université de Montréal Thèse présentée à la Faculté des études supérieures en vue de l'obtention du grade de Ph.D. en Sciences biologiques Juillet 2008 © Jamit Vaezi, 2008 Université de Montréal Faculté des etudes supérieures Cette the se intitulée: Origin of Symphyotrichum altticosteltse (Asteraceae: Astereae), an endemic species of the Gulf of St. Lawrence présentée par: Jami! Vaezi a été évaluée par un jury composé des personnes suivantes: Anne Bruneau, Présidente rapporteuse Luc Brouillet, directeur de recherche Mohamed Rijri, membre du jury Geraldine A. Allen, examinatrice externe Représentant du doyen de la FES ii Abstract This thesis discusses the origin of Symphyotrichum anticostense, a decaploid species restricted to the Gulf of St. Lawrence region (Quebec, New Brunswick, and Maine). Two closely related species, S. novi-belgii, a hexaploid and S. boreale, a putatively tetraploid species have been proposed to be putative parents of S. anticostense. Symphyotrichum novi-belgii is distributed in the eastern coastal region of North America and S. boreale is widespread throughout the northern part of North America from west to east. These three species belong to the genus Symphyotrichum, which comprises ca. 91 species ofwhich more th an 50% are polyploids. The evolutionary history of the genus is poorly known even at the diploidy level. Before investigating the origin of S. anticostense, it seems necessary in the first step to elucidate phylogenetic relationships within the genus. The objectives ofthis thesis are therefore to delimit species boundaries excluding polyploid species and to investigate the origin of S. anticostense. The ITS data set nearly supports previous classifications based on morphological and cytological approaches, while the GAPDH nuclear gene is in poor agreement with the ITS results. Incomplete lineage sorting within Symphyotrichum is shown by stochastic sorting of ancestral polymorphisms among the GAPDH alleles. This evidence, in combination with the insufficient resolution among ribotypes, suggests recent evolutionary radiation of the genus. Univariate and multivariate morphological analyses as weil as the ITS results roughly support S. anticostense to be a hybrid derivative of S. novi-belgii and S. boreale. The ITS-based network analysis suggests three independent geographical origins for S. anticostellse: 1) Lake St. John; 2) Gaspé Peninsula- New Brunswick- Maine; 3) Anticosti Island. The results oftwo nuclear genes (GAPDH and MIPS) demonstrate relative incongruence between the phylogenetic trees. Although the results obtained from the 111 latter markers support those obtained from the morphological and ITS data sets, incomplete lineage sorting strongly affected the phylogenetic relationships among species. Key words: Asteraceae, Astereae, Symphyotrichum, Symphyotrichum anticostellse, polyploidy, hybridization, phylogeny, incongruence, incomplete lineage sorting, radiation. IV Résumé Cette thèse porte sur l'origine de Symphyotrichum anticostense, une espèce décaploïde de la région du golfe du Saint-Laurent (Québec, Nouveau Brunswick, et Maine). Il a été proposé que S. anticostense serait une allopolyploïde dérivée de l'hybride entre S. novi-belgii, une hexaploïde et S. boreale, une espèce putatifment tetraploïde. S. novi-belgii est distribuée dans la région côtière d'est d'Amérique du Nord et S. boreale est répandue à travers de la partie du nord d'Amérique du Nord de l'ouest à l'est. Ces trois espèces appartient au genre Symphyotrichum qui comprend 91 espèce. Plus que 50% de celles-ci sont polyploïdes. Les relations phylogénétiques au sein du genre sont aussi inconnues même au niveau diploïdie. Avant d'examiner l'origine de S. anticostense, il semble nécessaire dans la première étape d'expliquer les relations phylogénétiques du genre. Les objectifs de cette thèse sont donc de délimiter des espèces excluant des polyploïdes et examiner l'origine de S. anticostense. Le résultat d'analyse de donnée de l'ITS supporte presque des classifications auparavant basées sur les approches morphologiques et cytologiques. Le résultat du gène nucléaire GAPDH est faiblement en accord avec le résultat obtenu de l'ITS. Le triage des lignées incomplet dans Symphyotrichum est souligné par le triage au hasard des polymorphismes ancestraux parmi les alleles de GAPDH. Cette preuve ainsi que la résolution insuffisante parmi ribotypes, suggèrent une évolution récente du genre. Des analyses univariées et multivariées de données morphologiques ainsi que le résultat de marqueur d'ITS supportent la position taxonomique de S. anticostense comme un hybride dérivée de S. llovi-belgii et S. boreale. L'analyse basée sur réseau des ribtypes suggère trois origines géographiques pour S. anticostense: 1) Lac Saint-Jean; 2) Gaspèsie- Nouveau Brunswick- Maine; 3) l'Ile d'Anticosti. Les résultats de deux gènes nucléaires (GAPDH v et MIPS) démontrent relativement l'incongruence entre les arbres phylogenetiques. Bien que les résultats obtenus de ces marqueurs supportent ceux-là obtenus des données morphologiques et l'ITS, le triage des lignées incomplet a affecté extrêmement les relations phylogenetiques parmi des espèces. Mots clés: Asteraceae, Astereae, Symphyotrichum, Symphyotrichum Qnticostense, polyploïdie, hybridation, phylogénie, incongruence, triage des lignées incomplet, radiation. VI Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iii Résumé ................................................................................................................................ v Table of Contents .................................................................................................. ;........... vii List of tables ........................................................................................................................ x List of figures ..................................................................................................................... xi \ List of abbreviations ........................................................................................................ xiii Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ xiv CHAPTER 1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Taxonomic history of Symphyotrichum anticostense ................................................... 4 1.2 B iological characteristics .............................................................................................. 5 1.2.1 Taxonomy .......................................................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Distribution ...................................................................................................... 10 1.2.3 Ecology ............................................................................................................ 12 1.3 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 13 1.4 Polyploidy ................................................................................................................... 15 1.5 Hybridization .............................................................................................................. 16 1.5.l Detection ofhybrid speciation ........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List
    5/12/16 State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X http://wetland-plants.usace.army.mil/ Aquilegia caerulea James (Colorado Blue Columbine) Photo: William Gray List Counts: Wetland AW GP WMVC Total UPL 83 120 101 304 FACU 440 393 430 1263 FAC 333 292 355 980 FACW 342 329 333 1004 OBL 279 285 285 849 Rating 1477 1419 1504 1511 User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps Region. 3) Some state boundaries lie within two or more Corps Regions. If a species occurs in one region but not the other, its rating will be shown in one column and the other column will be BLANK. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1/22 5/12/16 Scientific Name Authorship AW GP WMVC Common Name Abies bifolia A. Murr. FACU FACU Rocky Mountain Alpine Fir Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL UPL FACU Velvetleaf Acalypha rhomboidea Raf. FACU FACU Common Three-Seed-Mercury Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FACU Rocky Mountain Maple Acer grandidentatum Nutt. FACU FAC FACU Canyon Maple Acer negundo L. FACW FAC FAC Ash-Leaf Maple Acer platanoides L. UPL UPL FACU Norw ay Maple Acer saccharinum L. FAC FAC FAC Silver Maple Achillea millefolium L. FACU FACU FACU Common Yarrow Achillea ptarmica L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plant Press the ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY
    The Plant Press THE ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY Volume 36, Number 1 Summer 2013 In this Issue: Plants of the Madrean Archipelago 1-4 Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Conference 5-8 Abstracts of Botanical Papers Presented in the Madrean Archipelago Conference Southwest Coralbean (Erythrina flabelliformis). Plus 11-19 Conservation Priority Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Setting for Arizona G1 Conference and G2 Plant Species: A Regional Assessment by Thomas R. Van Devender1. Photos courtesy the author. & Our Regular Features Today the term ‘bioblitz’ is popular, meaning an intensive effort in a short period to document the diversity of animals and plants in an area. The first bioblitz in the southwestern 2 President’s Note United States was the 1848-1855 survey of the new boundary between the United States and Mexico after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 ended the Mexican-American War. 8 Who’s Who at AZNPS The border between El Paso, Texas and the Colorado River in Arizona was surveyed in 1855- 9 & 17 Book Reviews 1856, following the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. Besides surveying and marking the border with monuments, these were expeditions that made extensive animal and plant collections, 10 Spotlight on a Native often by U.S. Army physicians. Botanists John M. Bigelow (Charphochaete bigelovii), Charles Plant C. Parry (Agave parryi), Arthur C. V. Schott (Stephanomeria schotti), Edmund K. Smith (Rhamnus smithii), George Thurber (Stenocereus thurberi), and Charles Wright (Cheilanthes wrightii) made the first systematic plant collection in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands. ©2013 Arizona Native Plant In 1892-94, Edgar A. Mearns collected 30,000 animal and plant specimens on the second Society.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Wisconsin Asterids
    Diversity of Wisconsin Asterids . bellflowers and asters . **Campanulaceae - bellflower family A family mostly of herbs, but some secondarily woody, widely distributed in the temperate regions and in the montane tropics. Contains 65 genera and over 2200 species, with half belonging to Campanula and Lobelia. • Family has alternate leaves and milky latex. • Flowers are 5 merous and inferior ovaried. **Campanulaceae - bellflower family The family is divided into two distinct subfamilies - Campanuloideae and Lobelioideae - distinguished by floral symmetry, staminal fusion, and carpel number. They were often considered as separate families. Campanulastrum - bellflower Lobelia - lobelia Subfamily Campanuloideae Subfamily Lobelioideae **Campanulaceae - bellflower family Subfamily Campanuloideae __ CA (5) CO (5) A 5 G (3-5) Campanula and relatives have actinomorphic flowers, stamens not fused, and 3-5 fused carpels. Note the 3 styles of Campanula to the left. **Campanulaceae - bellflower family Triodanis perfoliata - Venus looking glass Secondary pollen presentation **Campanulaceae - bellflower family Campanulastrum americana - tall bellflower **Campanulaceae - bellflower family Campanula rotundifolia Campanula rapunculoides Bluebell - circumboreal European bellflower **Campanulaceae - bellflower family Subfamily Lobelioideae Lobelia and relatives have __ zygomorphic flowers, stamens fused CA (5) CO (5) A (5) G (2) into a tube in which the pollen is shed, and 2 fused carpels. Style pushes pollen out through the tube. Style Staminal tube **Campanulaceae
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant Species Not Listed Are Considered UPL for Wetland Delineation Purposes
    GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps region.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date
    Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date EQUISETACEAE HORSETAIL FAMILY Equisetum arvense L. Field Horsetail FF Equisetum fluviatile L. Water Horsetail LRB Equisetum hyemale L. ssp. affine (Engelm.) Stone Common Scouring-rush BS Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun Smooth Scouring-rush WM Equisetum variegatum Scheich. ex Fried. ssp. Small Horsetail LRB Variegatum DENNSTAEDIACEAE BRACKEN FAMILY Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn Bracken-Fern COF DRYOPTERIDACEAE TRUE FERN FAMILILY Athyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth ssp. angustum (Willd.) Northeastern Lady Fern FF Clausen Cystopteris bulbifera (L.) Bernh. Bulblet Fern FF Dryopteris carthusiana (Villars) H.P. Fuchs Spinulose Woodfern FF Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. Ostrich Fern FF Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern FF Polystichum acrostichoides (Michaux) Schott Christmas Fern FF ADDER’S-TONGUE- OPHIOGLOSSACEAE FERN FAMILY Botrychium virginianum (L.) Sw. Rattlesnake Fern FF FLOWERING FERN OSMUNDACEAE FAMILY Osmunda regalis L. Royal Fern WM POLYPODIACEAE POLYPODY FAMILY Polypodium virginianum L. Rock Polypody FF MAIDENHAIR FERN PTERIDACEAE FAMILY Adiantum pedatum L. ssp. pedatum Northern Maidenhair Fern FF THELYPTERIDACEAE MARSH FERN FAMILY Thelypteris palustris (Salisb.) Schott Marsh Fern WM LYCOPODIACEAE CLUB MOSS FAMILY Lycopodium lucidulum Michaux Shining Clubmoss OF Lycopodium tristachyum Pursh Ground-cedar COF SELAGINELLACEAE SPIKEMOSS FAMILY Selaginella apoda (L.) Fern. Spikemoss LRB CUPRESSACEAE CYPRESS FAMILY Juniperus communis L. Common Juniper Jun-E DS Juniperus virginiana L. Red Cedar Jun-E SD Thuja occidentalis L. White Cedar LRB PINACEAE PINE FAMILY Larix laricina (Duroi) K. Koch Tamarack Jun LRB Pinus banksiana Lambert Jack Pine COF Pinus resinosa Sol. ex Aiton Red Pine Jun-M CF Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List 1 Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date Pinus strobus L.
    [Show full text]
  • Géologie Et Biodiversité Végétale Quelques Rappels
    Géologie et Biodiversité végétale Quelques rappels Modifications climatiques Isolement géographique génèrent de la biodiversité Rift Est-Africain : Longueur : 6000 km Ecartement : 1 cm/an Début : il y a 20 MA Sommets : Volcans sauf Rwenzori Ages : 2 à 3 Ma Kili : activité récente Meru : encore actif Petite parenthèse Cette région est considérée comme le berceau de l’humanité Théorie développée par Yves Coppens… Mais… Mais revenons à la botanique… avec les Seneçons géants Du genre Dendrosenecio Dendrosenecio adnivalis 11 espèces. erici-rosenii elgonensis Initialement comprises dans le genre Senecio cheranganensis Se rencontrent entre 2500 m et 4600 m sur brassiciformis les montagnes d’Afrique de l’Est. battiscombei keniodendron keniensis kilimandjari Senecio ovatus (Seneçon de Fuchs) johnstonii meruensis Dendrosenecio adnivalis Rwenzori erici-rosenii elgonensis Elgon cheranganensis Cherangani brassiciformis battiscombei Aderb . keniodendron Kenya keniensis kilimandjari Kilimandjaro johnstonii meruensis Meru Dendrosenecio adnivalis Rwenzori erici-rosenii elgonensis Elgon cheranganensis Cherangani brassiciformis battiscombei Aderb . keniodendron Kenya keniensis kilimandjari Kilimandjaro johnstonii meruensis Meru Mt Stanley 5109 m Rwenzori Lobelia 3500 m 3800 m Lobelia deckenii Dendrosenecio keniensis 4500 m Lobelia telekiii 4300 m Dendrosenecio keniodendron Kilimandjaro 4000 m Dendrosenecio kilimandjari Lien de parenté avec les genres proches: Euryops brownei Cineraria deltoidea Dendrosenecio Le genre Dendrosenecio est très isolé, les genres
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List for Scheier Natural Area - Fluvanna County Plant List Compiled by Glenn Metzler and Tom Dierauf in Late Summer 2001
    Plant List for Scheier Natural Area - Fluvanna County Plant list compiled by Glenn Metzler and Tom Dierauf in late summer 2001. This list is from a single season observation only and is not comprehensive. Club Mosses Lycopodiaceae Lycopodium digitatum running cedar Lycopodium obscurum ground pine Ferns and Fern Allies Ophioglossaceae Botrychium dissectum grapefern Osmundaceae Osmunda cinnamomea cinnamon fern Osmunda regalis fern, royal Polypodiaceae Asplenium platyneuron spleenwort, ebony Athyrium asplenioides southern lady fern Dryopteris cristata shield-fern,crested Woodwardia areolata netted chain fern Onoclea sensibilis sensitive fern Polystichum acrostichoides fern,christmas Pteridium aquilinum fern,bracken Thelypteris noveboracensis new york fern Dennstaedtia punctilobula hay-scented fern Conifers Cupressaceae Juniperus virginiana cedar,eastern red Pinaceae Pinus echinata short-leaved pine Pinus strobus white pine Pinus taeda loblolly pine Pinus virginiana Virginia pine Monocots Araceae Arisaema triphyllum jack-in-the-pulpit Commelinaceae Commelina diffusa dayflower,spreading Cyperaceae Carex crinita sedge Carex lurida sedge,shallow Carex intumescens sedge Carex plantaginea? sedge Cyperus strigosus sedge Rhynchospora capitellata? beak rush Scirpus atrovirens bulrush,green Scirpus cyperinus woolgrass Scirpus polyphyllus bulrush,leafy Dioscoreaceae Dioscorea villosa yam,yellow Juncaceae Juncus effusus common rush Juncus tenuis path rush Liliaceae Medeola virginiana indian cucumber root Polygonatum biflorum solomon's-seal,small Smilax
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Bryce
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 ON THE COVER Matted prickly-phlox (Leptodactylon caespitosum), Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]