Hydrogeologic Data for the Big River–Mishnock River Stream-Aquifer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hydrogeologic Data for the Big River–Mishnock River Stream-Aquifer Hydrogeologic Data for the Big River–Mishnock River Stream-Aquifer System, Central Rhode Island By Patrick A. Craft Abstract from aquifer tests, and water-quality data. Histori- cal water-level data from other wells within the Hydrogeology, ground-water development study area also are presented in this report. alternatives, and water quality in the Big–Mish- nock stream-aquifer system in central Rhode Surface-water data were obtained from a Island are being investigated as part of a long-term network consisting of surface-water impound- cooperative program between the Rhode Island ments, such as ponds and reservoirs, existing and Water Resources Board and the U.S. Geological newly established partial-record stream-discharge Survey to evaluate the ground-water resources sites, and synoptic surface-water-quality sites. throughout Rhode Island. The study area includes Water levels were collected monthly from the the Big River drainage basin and that portion of surface-water impoundments. Stream-discharge the Mishnock River drainage basin upstream from measurements were made at partial-record sites to the Mishnock River at State Route 3. This report provide measurements of inflow, outflow, and presents geologic data and hydrologic and water- internal flow throughout the study area. Specific quality data for ground and surface water. conductance was measured monthly at partial- Ground-water data were collected from July record sites during the study, and also during the 1996 through September 1998 from a network of fall and spring of 1997 and 1998 at 41 synoptic observation wells consisting of existing wells and sites throughout the study area. wells installed for this study, which provided a General geologic data, such as estimates of broad distribution of data-collection sites through- out the study area. Streambed piezometers were depth to bedrock and depth to water table, as well used to obtain differences in head data between as indications of underlying geologic structure, surface-water levels and ground-water levels to were obtained from geophysical surveys. Site- help evaluate stream-aquifer interactions through- specific geologic data were collected during the out the study area. The types of data presented drilling of observation wells and test holes. These include monthly ground-water levels, average data include depth to bedrock or refusal, depth to daily ground-water withdrawals, drawdown data water table, and lithologic information. Abstract 1 INTRODUCTION Since the mid-1950s, the USGS has investigated the ground-water conditions and examined the bedrock In 1995, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in and surficial geology of the study area shown on the cooperation with the Rhode Island Water Resources four topographic quadrangles (Coventry Center, Board (RIWRB) initiated a hydrogeologic investiga- Crompton, Hope Valley, and Slocum topographic tion in the Big–Mishnock stream-aquifer system quadrangles). These studies were published as a series (fig. 1). This investigation was designed to assess the of ground-water maps, bedrock-geology maps, and hydrogeologic setting and water resources within the surficial-geology maps. Ground-water maps have been study area. This report contains data collected as part published for all four quadrangles, bedrock-geology of this study. maps have been published for three quadrangles, and This report provides regulators, scientists, and three quadrangles have surficial-geology maps (Allen managers with the data needed to understand and eval- and Johnson, 1959; Bierschenk and Hahn, 1959; uate the hydrogeologic factors that affect ground-water Feininger, 1962; Hahn, 1959; Mason and Hahn, 1960; development in the Big–Mishnock stream-aquifer Moore, 1963; Power, 1959; Power, 1957; Quinn, 1963; system. This report presents data on ground-water and and Smith, 1956). surface-water levels within the study area from July In the 1960s, the State proposed to construct 1996 through September 1998. Descriptions of subsur- a reservoir in the study area to meet growing water face conditions, aquifer lithology from samples col- needs. This proposal initiated a number of studies in lected during drilling, stream-discharge measurements, the study area, including a preliminary geotechnical and ground-water-quality data are also included. investigation and a feasibility study (Keyes and The 32-mi2 study area includes the Big River Associates and Metcalf and Eddy Inc., 1977; United drainage basin and that portion of the Mishnock River States Army Corps of Engineers, 1979a, 1979b, 1979c, drainage basin upstream from the Mishnock River at 1980a, 1980b, 1980c; Maguire and Goldberg, Zoino, State Route 3. The Big River portion is about 29 mi2, and Associates, Inc., 1984; A.D. Little, Inc., 1989). The and the Mishnock River portion is about 3 mi2. Both 1989 report by A.D. Little, Inc., states that “the central basins contain stratified-deposit aquifers overlying region is the area of the State with the most critical cur- granite of the Scituate Igneous Suite (Hermes and oth- rent water-supply deficit,” which led to further studies ers, 1994). The study area overlaps Coventry Center, of the Big–Mishnock stream-aquifer system. Crompton, Hope Valley, and Slocum topographic quad- On behalf of the Rhode Island Water Resources rangles. The Big River portion is sparsely populated, Board and the USGS, the author wishes to thank with most of the population living along the upper Scott Michaud, Jennifer Sandorf, Bill Abrahams- reaches of the tributaries to the Big River. Most of the Dematte, Dennis Orlowski, and Dr. Anne Veeger Big River area is woodlands and meadows. The Mish- from the Department of Geosciences at the University nock River portion is moderately to heavily populated of Rhode Island (URI), who volunteered many and the predominant features are Mishnock Lake and hours during the geophysical and water-quality-data Mishnock Swamp. collection efforts. Additionally, the author wishes to Both areas are sub-basins to the South Branch thank Mr. Timothy Brown, General Manager, Kent of the Pawtuxet River Basin. Additional data are in a County Water Authority, for providing public-water- hydrologic data report for the South Branch of the supply-well withdrawal and aquifer-test data associated Pawtuxet River Basin (Gonthier, 1966). with the Mishnock River portion of the study area. 2 Hydrogeologic Data for the Big River–Mishnock River Stream-Aquifer System, Central Rhode Island Wallum Lake Woonsocket Slatersville MASSACHUSETTS Reservoir B Pawtucket l a Reservoir er c v k i st R o n h e c Pascoag n R a i W v Reservoir r e r B oo na s Glocester q u a t Ponaganset u Reservoir c k Pawtucket P e t o James V. Turner n R Reservoir a i v ga Providence n e r s Scituate e Ten Mile R. t Foster R i v e r er Riv Scituate t Reservoir e Pawtucket x u t w a Warren CONNECTICUT RHODE ISLANDP Flat River Reservoir Bristol Mishnock Swamp East Greenwich er r iv BIG–MISHNOCK e R v t i n R u ig H STUDY AREA B iver r e Wickford et R v i R Belleville n r e e Pond v Narragansett Bay Pachet Brook Sakom e i u R Reservoir Q r t - t e g u u v i Little Compton a c R s r p e e t m u e v Indian i x r q e s u Lake Newport R v p qua i U i a d h R t o C t y o e a Great Swamp P w W a r Rive Wakefield h uck Narragansett s t ca Worden A w a Pond P r e v i Watchaug R Pond k Westerly c Point Judith u t a c w 0 a 10 20 MILES P 0 10 20 KILOMETERS Figure 1. Location of the Big–Mishnock stream-aquifer system, central Rhode Island. Introduction 3 SITE-IDENTIFICATION In assigning site-identification numbers to NUMBERS surface-water sites, no distinction is made between continuous-record sites and other types of sites such All data-collection sites associated with this as partial-record sites; therefore, the site number for study, including wells, piezometers, ponds, reservoirs, a continuous-record site indicates downstream-order and streams were assigned identification numbers position in a list made up of all types of sites. Gaps are (pl. 1). The USGS uses two methods to assign identifi- left in the series of numbers to allow for new sites that cation numbers to ground-water sites and surface- may be established; hence, the numbers are not always water sites; both are based on location. The “latitude- consecutive. The first two digits indicate the Part longitude” system is used for ground-water sites, number (formerly used in USGS Water-Supply Papers such as wells, springs, piezometers, and for pond to designate major river systems) and the last six or and reservoir sites. In addition, each ground-water more digits indicate the downstream order within the site is assigned a local well number from the “well- Part. For example, in the site number 01115630, “01” numbering” system. Surface-water sites are assigned a is the Part number for the “North Atlantic Slope number based on the “downstream-order” system. Basins” and the “115630” is the downstream order The 15-digit identification numbers for ground- number. water, pond, or reservoir sites are assigned according to the latitude and longitude at the site. The first six digits HYDROLOGIC DATA denote the degrees, minutes, and seconds of latitude; the next seven digits denote degrees, minutes, and sec- The hydrologic data are divided into ground- onds of longitude; and the last two digits (assigned water data and surface-water data. Within the stream- sequentially) distinguish between data-collection aquifer system there is usually continual interaction sites within a 1-second grid. Once assigned, this site- between ground water and surface water, as in the rela- identification number no longer has locational signifi- tion between decreased streamflow and increased with- cance.
Recommended publications
  • Geological Survey
    imiF.NT OF Tim BULLETIN UN ITKI) STATKS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 115 A (lECKJKAPHIC DKTIOXARY OF KHODK ISLAM; WASHINGTON GOVKRNMKNT PRINTING OFF1OK 181)4 LIBRARY CATALOGUE SLIPS. i United States. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Department of the interior | | Bulletin | of the | United States | geological survey | no. 115 | [Seal of the department] | Washington | government printing office | 1894 Second title: United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | A | geographic dictionary | of | Rhode Island | by | Henry Gannett | [Vignette] | Washington | government printing office 11894 8°. 31 pp. Gannett (Henry). United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | A | geographic dictionary | of | Khode Island | hy | Henry Gannett | [Vignette] Washington | government printing office | 1894 8°. 31 pp. [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Bulletin 115]. 8 United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | * A | geographic dictionary | of | Ehode Island | by | Henry -| Gannett | [Vignette] | . g Washington | government printing office | 1894 JS 8°. 31pp. a* [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (Z7. S. geological survey). ~ . Bulletin 115]. ADVERTISEMENT. [Bulletin No. 115.] The publications of the United States Geological Survey are issued in accordance with the statute approved March 3, 1879, which declares that "The publications of the Geological Survey shall consist of the annual report of operations, geological and economic maps illustrating the resources and classification of the lands, and reports upon general and economic geology and paleontology. The annual report of operations of the Geological Survey shall accompany the annual report of the Secretary of the Interior. All special memoirs and reports of said Survey shall be issued in uniform quarto series if deemed necessary by tlie Director, but other­ wise in ordinary octavos.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-2020 Category 5 Waters 303(D) List of Impaired Waters
    2018-2020 Category 5 Waters 303(d) List of Impaired Waters Blackstone River Basin Wilson Reservoir RI0001002L-01 109.31 Acres CLASS B Wilson Reservoir. Burrillville TMDL TMDL Use Description Use Attainment Status Cause/Impairment Schedule Approval Comment Fish and Wildlife habitat Not Supporting NON-NATIVE AQUATIC PLANTS None No TMDL required. Impairment is not a pollutant. Fish Consumption Not Supporting MERCURY IN FISH TISSUE 2025 None Primary Contact Recreation Not Assessed Secondary Contact Recreation Not Assessed Echo Lake (Pascoag RI0001002L-03 349.07 Acres CLASS B Reservoir) Echo Lake (Pascoag Reservoir). Burrillville, Glocester TMDL TMDL Use Description Use Attainment Status Cause/Impairment Schedule Approval Comment Fish and Wildlife habitat Not Supporting NON-NATIVE AQUATIC PLANTS None No TMDL required. Impairment is not a pollutant. Fish Consumption Not Supporting MERCURY IN FISH TISSUE 2025 None Primary Contact Recreation Fully Supporting Secondary Contact Recreation Fully Supporting Draft September 2020 Page 1 of 79 Category 5 Waters Blackstone River Basin Smith & Sayles Reservoir RI0001002L-07 172.74 Acres CLASS B Smith & Sayles Reservoir. Glocester TMDL TMDL Use Description Use Attainment Status Cause/Impairment Schedule Approval Comment Fish and Wildlife habitat Not Supporting NON-NATIVE AQUATIC PLANTS None No TMDL required. Impairment is not a pollutant. Fish Consumption Not Supporting MERCURY IN FISH TISSUE 2025 None Primary Contact Recreation Fully Supporting Secondary Contact Recreation Fully Supporting Slatersville Reservoir RI0001002L-09 218.87 Acres CLASS B Slatersville Reservoir. Burrillville, North Smithfield TMDL TMDL Use Description Use Attainment Status Cause/Impairment Schedule Approval Comment Fish and Wildlife habitat Not Supporting COPPER 2026 None Not Supporting LEAD 2026 None Not Supporting NON-NATIVE AQUATIC PLANTS None No TMDL required.
    [Show full text]
  • RI DEM/Water Resources
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Water Resources WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS July 2006 AUTHORITY: These regulations are adopted in accordance with Chapter 42-35 pursuant to Chapters 46-12 and 42-17.1 of the Rhode Island General Laws of 1956, as amended STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Water Resources WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS RULE 1. PURPOSE............................................................................................................ 1 RULE 2. LEGAL AUTHORITY ........................................................................................ 1 RULE 3. SUPERSEDED RULES ...................................................................................... 1 RULE 4. LIBERAL APPLICATION ................................................................................. 1 RULE 5. SEVERABILITY................................................................................................. 1 RULE 6. APPLICATION OF THESE REGULATIONS .................................................. 2 RULE 7. DEFINITIONS....................................................................................................... 2 RULE 8. SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS............................................... 10 RULE 9. EFFECT OF ACTIVITIES ON WATER QUALITY STANDARDS .............. 23 RULE 10. PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS, TREATMENT AND PRETREATMENT........... 24 RULE 11. PROHIBITED
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Water Use and Availability in the Pawtucket and Quinebaug
    Estimated Water Use and Availability in the Pawtuxet and Quinebaug River Basins, Rhode Island, 1995–99 By Emily C. Wild and Mark T. Nimiroski Prepared in cooperation with the Rhode Island Water Resources Board Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5154 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Wild, E.C., and Nimiroski, M.T., 2007, Estimated water use and availability in the Pawtuxet and Quinebaug River Basins, Rhode Island, 1995–99: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5154, 68 p. iii Contents Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Purpose and Scope . 2 Previous Investigations . 2 Climatological Setting . 6 The Pawtuxet River Basin . 6 Land Use . 7 Pawtuxet River Subbasins . 7 Minor Civil Divisions . 17 The Quinebaug River Basin . 20 Estimated Water Use . 20 New England Water-Use Data System .
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Geology and Aquifer Characteristics of the Big River Area, Central Rhode Island
    U.S. Department of the Interior Stone and Dickerman U.S. Geological Survey Glacial Geology and Aquifer — Characteristics of the GLACIAL Big River Area, Central GEOLOGY Rhode Island AND AQUIFER CHARACTERISTICS OF By JANET RADWAY STONE and DAVID C. DICKERMAN Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4169 MASSACHUSETTS RHODE ISLAND CONNECTICUT THE BIG RIVER Big River Study Area AREA, CENTRAL RHODE ISLAND Prepared in cooperation with the RHODE ISLAND WATER RESOURCES BOARD — WRIR 01-4169 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Glacial Geology and Aquifer Characteristics of the Big River Area, Central Rhode Island By JANET RADWAY STONE and DAVID C. DICKERMAN Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4169 Prepared in cooperation with the RHODE ISLAND WATER RESOURCES BOARD Northborough, Massachusetts 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Subdistrict Chief U.S. Geological Survey Massachusetts-Rhode Island District Branch of Information Services U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286 Water Resources Division Denver, CO 80225-0286 10 Bearfoot Road Northborough, MA 01532 or visit our Web site at http://ma.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Impoundment
    FINAL DETERMINATION OF THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR WATER PURSUANT TO SECI'ION 404(c) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT CONCERNING THE PROPOSED BIG RIVER WATER SUPPLY IMPOUNDMENT KENT COUNTY, RHODE ISLAND March 1, 1990 d section m(cj of the lean Water ~ct(33 U.S.C.Section IZSI et seq.) provider that, if the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determines, after notice and opportunity for public hearing, that unacceptable adverse effects on municipal water supplies, shellfish beds, fishery areas (including spawning and breeding areas), wildlife, or recreational areas will result from the discharge of dredged or £illmaterial, he may exercise his authority to withdraw or prohibit the specification, or deny, restrict or withdraw the use for spec~ficatian,of any defined area as a disposal site for dredged or fill material. The Section 404(c) regulations state that, before making such a determination, the Administrator must consult with the Chief of the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), the property owner(,), and the applicant where there has been an application for a Section 404 permit. The procedures for - implementation of Section 404(c) are set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR Part 231. EPA's regulations for implementing Section 404(c) establish procedures to be followed in exercising the Administrator's authority pursuant to that Section. Three major steps in the process are: 1) the Regional Administrator's proposed decision to withdraw, deny, restrict or prohibit the use of a site (Proposed Determination); 2) the Regional Administrator's recommendation to the Administrator towithdraw, deny, restrict or prohiit the use of a site (Recommended Determination); and 3) the Administrator's final decision to affirm, mod@, or rescind the Regional recommendation (Final Determination).
    [Show full text]
  • West Greenwich, Rhode Island: a Preliminary Report
    Historic and Architectural Resources of West Greenwich, Rhode Island: A Preliminary Report RIHPC LIBRARY -- STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS * PRELIMINARY SURVEY REPORT TOWN OF WEST GREENWICH * OCTOBER 1978 RHODE ISLAND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMISSION 150 BENEFIT STREET, PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND 02903 I. un. I I PREFACE The Rhode Island Historical Preservation Commission, established by the General Assembly in 1968, is charged with the reponsibi1ity of safeguarding Rhode Island’s cultural heritage. In order to provide an overview of the physical record of this heritage, the Commission has initiated a "broadbrush" or preliminary planning survey of the rural and suburban towns of the state. The purpose of this initial inventory is to identify and record properties ofhistoric and architectural significance in each town. Presently, archeological resources are treated through a separate survey effort being conducted by the Commission. The preliminary surveys are designed to provide a catalogue of non-renewable cultural resources needed for a variety of planning purposes at the local, state and national levels. They identify sites, districts and structures eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places Wand they become the basis for establishing preservation planning priorities basedon problems and po.tentials.discovéred as part of the survey process. * The preliminary surveys are accomplished by driving all public rights-of-way in a given town and noting on large-scale United States Geological Survey maps or other maps that may he more appropriate each building or ite of particulEr architectural, visual, cultural or historic significance. Each property is photographed and recorded on a standard data * *u .* 11.11: sheet which includes a physical description and notations con cerning history, use, condition and architectural ‘style or period.
    [Show full text]
  • Dam Safety Program
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND 2009 Annual Report to the Governor on the Activities of the DAM SAFETY PROGRAM Overtopping earthen embankment of Creamer Dam (No. 742), Tiverton Department of Environmental Management Prepared by the Office of Compliance and Inspection TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORY OF RHODE ISLAND’S DAM SAFETY PROGRAM....................................................................3 STATUTES................................................................................................................................................3 GOVERNOR’S TASK FORCE ON DAM SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE .................................................3 DAM SAFETY REGULATIONS .................................................................................................................4 DAM CLASSIFICATIONS..........................................................................................................................5 INSPECTION PROGRAM ............................................................................................................................7 ACTIVITIES IN 2009.....................................................................................................................................8 UNSAFE DAMS.........................................................................................................................................8 INSPECTIONS ........................................................................................................................................10 High Hazard Dam Inspections .............................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment and Field Testing of a Rapid Bioassessment Screening of Rhode Island Freshwater Benthic Macroinvertebrates
    SDMS DOCID 283293 Establishment and Field Testing of a Rapid Bioassessment Screening of Rhode Island Freshwater Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Completion of a Research Project for Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management by Mark Gould College of Arts and Sciences Roger Williams University Bristol, RI 02809 December 1994 INTRODUCTION Previous studies by the author (Gould 1991, 1992, 1993) resulted in the enumeration of the freshwater macroinvertebrates in Rhode Island over a period of three years. These studies, along with the present study, provide a baseline for further studies and the documentation of freshwater macrofauna present within the state. The 1990 to 1991 sampling of the Rhode Island streams yielded significant information concerning the distribution of the macrofauna. The methodology provided a fast collection and data interpretation device once proper identification in the field was obtained. The 1991 to 1992 study confirmed the methodology, and began to develop trends within the macrofauna populations. The 1992 to 1993 study further refined the collection and analytical techniques and reports on longer term population structures within the streams of Rhode Island. In this study, the fourth year of data enumeration has resulted in an analysis of the data over the four year time frame to determine trends within the macroinvertebrate population. Stream invertebrates are well-adapted to their environment. Many species exist in the larval stage for a year or more; the adult often emerges for one or two days, mates, and dies. The survival of the species is dependent upon favorable environmental conditions in the water column. If conditions are not conducive at any time for the survival of a particular species, the stream will not support such a population.
    [Show full text]
  • RI 2008 Integrated Report
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS 2008 INTEGRATED WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT REPORT SECTION 305(b) STATE OF THE STATE’S WATERS REPORT And SECTION 303(d) LIST OF IMPAIRED WATERS FINAL APRIL 1, 2008 RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES www.dem.ri.gov STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS 2008 INTEGRATED WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT REPORT Section 305(b) State of the State’s Waters Report And Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waters FINAL April 1, 2008 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES 235 Promenade Street Providence, RI 02908 (401) 222-4700 www.dem.ri.gov Table of Contents List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................iii List of Figures............................................................................................................................................iii Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 Integrated Report Overview.................................................................................................... 7 A. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 7 B. Background ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State of Rhode Island
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND 2001 Annual Report to the Governor on the Activities of the DAM SAFETY PROGRAM Dam No. 161 - Spillway at Gainer Memorial Dam, Scituate Department of Environmental Management Prepared by the Office of Compliance and Inspection TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORY OF RHODE ISLAND’S DAM SAFETY PROGRAM....................................................................1 DAM CLASSIFICATIONS......................................................................................................................................1 STATUTES ..............................................................................................................................................................2 GOVERNOR’S TASK FORCE ON DAM SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE.....................................................2 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS .............................................................................................................4 INSPECTION PROGRAM ............................................................................................................................4 ACTIVITIES IN 2001.....................................................................................................................................5 HIGH HAZARD DAM INSPECTIONS..................................................................................................................5 SIGNIFICANT HAZARD DAM INSPECTIONS ..................................................................................................6 LOW HAZARD DAM INSPECTIONS...................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Connecticut Streamflow and Sustainable Water Use Estimator: a Decision-Support Tool to Estimate Water Availability at Ungaged Stream Locations in Connecticut
    Prepared in cooperation with the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection The Connecticut Streamflow and Sustainable Water Use Estimator: A Decision-Support Tool To Estimate Water Availability at Ungaged Stream Locations in Connecticut Scientific Investigations Report 2018–5135 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. West Cornwall Covered Bridge spanning the Housatonic River near Cornwall, Connecticut. Photograph by Tracey Thayer, used with permission. The Connecticut Streamflow and Sustainable Water Use Estimator: A Decision-Support Tool To Estimate Water Availability at Ungaged Stream Locations in Connecticut By Sara B. Levin, Scott A. Olson, Martha G. Nielsen, and Gregory E. Granato Prepared in cooperation with the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Scientific Investigations Report 2018–5135 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]