DOCSLIB.ORG

Bp Energy Outlook: 2020 Edition 4 |

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bp Energy Outlook: 2020 Edition 4 | Energy Outlook 2020 edition 2 | The Energy Outlook The Energy Outlook considers a number of different scenarios. These scenarios are not predictions of what is likely to happen or what bp explores the forces would like to happen. Rather they explore the possible implications of different judgements and assumptions concerning the nature of the shaping the global energy transition. The scenarios are based on existing and developing energy transition technologies which are known about today and do not consider the out to 2050 and the possibility of entirely new or unknown technologies emerging. Much of the analysis in the Outlook is focussed around three key uncertainties scenarios: Rapid, Net Zero and Business-as-usual. The multitude of surrounding that uncertainties means that the probability of any one of these scenarios materializing exactly as described is negligible. Moreover, the three transition scenarios do not provide a comprehensive description of all possible outcomes. However, the scenarios do span a wide range of possible outcomes and so might help to inform a judgement about the uncertainty surrounding energy markets out to 2050. The Energy Outlook is produced to inform bp’s analysis and strategy and is published as a contribution to the wider debate. But the Outlook is only one source among many when considering the future of global energy markets and bp considers a wide range of other analysis and information when forming its long-term strategy. 3 | bp Energy Outlook: 2020 edition 4 | In February of this year, bp In August, we set out a new strategy announced a new purpose – to in support of this purpose and reimagine energy for people and our ambition. It will see bp transform planet. This purpose was supported from an International Oil Company by a new ambition, to be a net-zero focused on producing resources to an company by 2050 or sooner and to Integrated Energy Company focused help get the world to net zero. on delivering solutions for customers. From IOC to IEC. And while the Our new purpose and ambition are Covid-19 pandemic has had a huge underpinned by four fundamental impact on the global economy and judgements about the future. That energy markets, it has not affected the world is on an unsustainable path our belief in and commitment to our Welcome to the and its carbon budget is running out. purpose, ambition and strategy. 2020 edition of That energy markets will undergo lasting change, shifting towards That belief and commitment is in bp’s Energy Outlook renewable and other forms of zero- no small part down to the objective or low-carbon energy. That demand analysis that goes into every edition for oil and gas will be increasingly of the Energy Outlook. It does not to challenged. And that, alongside many try to predict precise future outcomes others, bp can contribute to the – any attempt to do that is doomed to energy transition that the world wants fail. Instead, it helps us to understand and needs, and create value doing so. the many uncertainties ahead – in the near and longer term – by considering Customers will continue to Countries, cities and industries will a range of possible pathways the redefine mobility and convenience, increasing want their decarbonized energy transition may take over the underpinned by the mobility energy and mobility needs met next 30 years. This year’s Outlook revolution that is already underway with bespoke solutions, shifting the explores three main scenarios – combining electric vehicles, shared centre of gravity of energy markets Rapid, Net Zero and Business-as- mobility and autonomy. towards consumers and away from traditional upstream producers. usual – which span a wide range Oil and gas – while remaining of possible outcomes. Those three needed for decades – will be The Energy Outlook has been tracking scenarios have helped us to develop increasingly challenged as society and analysing the trajectory of the a strategy that we think is robust to shifts away from its reliance on fossil world’s energy system for the past the uncertainty around the pace and fuels 10 years. This year’s Outlook has nature of the energy transition. been instrumental in the development And those core beliefs lead us to of the new strategy we announced in three more about how the energy Three features are common across August. I hope it is useful to everyone system will change out to 2050: those scenarios and they form a set else seeking ways to accelerate the of core beliefs as to how energy energy transition and get to net zero. The energy mix will become demand is likely to change over the We welcome any feedback on the next three decades: more diverse, driven increasingly by customer choice rather than content and how we can improve. resource availability. Renewable energy will play an increasingly important role in meeting Markets will need more integration the world’s growing energy needs. to accommodate this more diverse supply and will become more localized as the world electrifies Bernard Looney and the role of hydrogen expands. chief executive officer 5 | bp Energy Outlook: 2020 edition Executive summary 6 | Key messages Global energy demand continues levels of integration and competition. to grow, at least for a period, driven These changes underpin core beliefs by increasing prosperity and living about how the global energy system standards in the emerging world. may restructure in a low-carbon Significant inequalities in energy transition. consumption and access to energy persist. Demand for oil falls over the next 30 years. The scale and pace of this The structure of energy demand decline is driven by the increasing is likely to change over time: efficiency and electrification of road declining role of fossil fuels, offset transportation. by an increasing share of renewable energy and a growing role for The outlook for natural gas is more electricity. These changes underpin resilient than for oil, underpinned by core beliefs about how the structure the role of natural gas in supporting of energy demand may change. fast growing developing economies as they decarbonized and reduce A transition to a lower carbon their reliance on coal, and as a energy system is likely to lead source of near-zero carbon energy to fundamental restructuring of when combined with carbon capture the global energy system, with a use and storage (CCUS). more diverse energy mix, greater consumer choice, more localized energy markets, and increasing Renewable energy, led by wind and The use of hydrogen increases as solar power, is the fastest growing the energy system progressively source of energy over the next 30 decarbonizes, carrying energy years, supported by a significant to activities which are difficult or increase in the development of – and costly to electrify. The production of investment in – new wind and solar hydrogen is dominated by a mix of capacity. blue and green hydrogen. The importance of electricity in The importance of bioenergy – final energy consumption increases biofuels, biomethane and biomass materially over the next 30 years. – increases as consumption shifts The carbon intensity of power away from fossil fuels. generation falls markedly, driven by renewables gaining share relative to The world is on an unsustainable coal. path. A rapid and sustained fall in carbon emissions is likely to require The intermittency associated with a series of policy measures, led the growing use of wind and solar by a significant increase in carbon power means a variety of different prices. These policies may need to technologies and solutions are be reinforced by shifts in societal needed to balance the energy behaviours and preferences. system and ensure the availability of Delaying these policies measures firm power. and societal shifts may lead to significant economic costs and disruption. 7 | bp Energy Outlook: 2020 edition Contents 8 | Overview 10 Regions 50 Three scenarios: Rapid, Net Zero and Summary 52 Business-as-usual 12 Regional energy demand and carbon emissions 54 Changing nature of global energy system 16 Fuel mix across key countries and regions 56 Global energy trade and energy imbalances 58 Global backdrop 18 Alternative scenario: Deglobalization 60 Total greenhouse gases 20 Global GDP 22 Demand and supply of energy sources 62 Climate impacts on GDP growth 24 Summary 64 Energy demand 26 Oil and liquid fuels 66 Impact of Covid-19 28 Gas 76 Energy access and economic development 30 Renewable energy in power 84 Coal 88 Energy use by sector 32 Nuclear power 90 Summary 34 Hydroelectricity 92 Industry 36 Non-combusted 38 Buildings 40 Transport 42 Other energy carriers 94 Investment 132 Electricity and power generation 96 Summary 134 Hydrogen 102 Upstream oil and gas investment 136 Carbon emissions from energy use 106 Comparisons 138 Summary 108 Revisions to Rapid 140 Carbon pathways 110 Comparing Rapid with external Outlooks 142 Alternative scenario: Delayed and Disorderly 112 Annex 144 Global energy system at net zero 118 Key figures, definitions, Summary 120 methodology and data sources 146 Energy demand 122 Electrification and the power sector 124 Oil and natural gas 126 Bioenergy and hydrogen 128 CCUS and negative emission technologies 130 9 | bp Energy Outlook: 2020 edition 10 | Overview Three scenarios: Rapid, Net Zero and Business-as-usual Changing nature of global energy system 11 | bp Energy Outlook: 2020 edition Overview 12 | Three scenarios to explore the energy transition to 2050 CO2 emissions from energy use Gt of CO2 40 Rapid Net Zero 35 Business-as-usual 30 25 20 5 0 5 0 2000 200 2020 2030 2040 2050 Key points This year’s Energy Outlook considers with limiting the rise in global that progress, albeit relatively slow, three main scenarios which explore temperatures by 2100 to well below means carbon emissions peak in the different pathways for the global 2-degrees Celsius above pre- mid-2020s.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Working Paper
    WORKING PAPER The Value of Oil Price Projectiom Nebojsa Nakinnovic Leo SchrattenhoLzer October 1935 IQ-85-68 lnternrtionrl Institute tor -lid System, Anrlyth NOT FOR QUOTATION WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE AUTHORS The Value of Oil Price Projections Nebo jsa Nakicenovic Leo SchrattenhoLzer October 1935 TW-85-68 Working Papers are interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute or of its National Member Organizations. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS 2361 Laxenburg, Austria -ABSTRACT AND SUBXAXY The central theme of this paper is the development of the international price of crude oil. A short overview of oil price his6ry is followed by a discussion of the factors that were responsible for previous, sometimes erratic, changes. We con- clude that these factors are likely to maintain their influence in the future, thus giving the forecasts of oil prices a high uncertainty. This uncertainty is reflected in several reports containing oil price proje[ctions. We argue, therefore, that a question soieiy about future oil prices must remain unanswered. Tnis does not render the efforts to examine the future futile; it simpiy means that the question shouid be rephrased. We offer one possible problem formulation that explicitly accounts for the high uncertainty. This formulation requires that specific policy probiems and options for solving them be specified before oil prices are projected - a condition that does not always hold or, at least, that does not seem to be regarded as important enougn to be described in many reports on oil price studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Net Zero by 2050 a Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050
    Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050 Interactive iea.li/nzeroadmap Net Zero by 2050 Data iea.li/nzedata INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines the IEA member IEA association full spectrum countries: countries: of energy issues including oil, gas and Australia Brazil coal supply and Austria China demand, renewable Belgium India energy technologies, Canada Indonesia electricity markets, Czech Republic Morocco energy efficiency, Denmark Singapore access to energy, Estonia South Africa demand side Finland Thailand management and France much more. Through Germany its work, the IEA Greece advocates policies Hungary that will enhance the Ireland reliability, affordability Italy and sustainability of Japan energy in its Korea 30 member Luxembourg countries, Mexico 8 association Netherlands countries and New Zealand beyond. Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Spain Sweden Please note that this publication is subject to Switzerland specific restrictions that limit Turkey its use and distribution. The United Kingdom terms and conditions are available online at United States www.iea.org/t&c/ This publication and any The European map included herein are without prejudice to the Commission also status of or sovereignty over participates in the any territory, to the work of the IEA delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Foreword We are approaching a decisive moment for international efforts to tackle the climate crisis – a great challenge of our times.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer
    U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46723 SUMMARY R46723 U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S. energy system has changed tremendously. Technological advances in energy production have driven changes in energy consumption, and Melissa N. Diaz, the United States has moved from being a net importer of most forms of energy to a declining Coordinator importer—and a net exporter in 2019. The United States remains the second largest producer and Analyst in Energy Policy consumer of energy in the world, behind China. Overall energy consumption in the United States has held relatively steady since 2000, while the mix of energy sources has changed. Between 2000 and 2019, consumption of natural gas and renewable energy increased, while oil and nuclear power were relatively flat and coal decreased. In the same period, production of oil, natural gas, and renewables increased, while nuclear power was relatively flat and coal decreased. Overall energy production increased by 42% over the same period. Increases in the production of oil and natural gas are due in part to technological improvements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have facilitated access to resources in unconventional formations (e.g., shale). U.S. oil production (including natural gas liquids and crude oil) and natural gas production hit record highs in 2019. The United States is the largest producer of natural gas, a net exporter, and the largest consumer. Oil, natural gas, and other liquid fuels depend on a network of over three million miles of pipeline infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Consumption by Source and Sector, 2019 (Quadrillion Btu)
    U.S. energy consumption by source and sector, 2019 (Quadrillion Btu) Sourcea End-use sectorc Percent of sources Percent of sectors 70 91 Transportation Petroleum 24 3 28.2 36.7 3 5 2 <1 (37%) (37%) 1 34 40 9 Industrial 4 3 26.3 Natural gas 12 33 (35%) 32.1 16 11 (32%) 36 8 44 7 Residential 41 11.9 (16%) 12 9 22 39 Renewable energy 7 3 Commercial 11.5 (11%) 2 <1 9.4 (12%) 56 49 10 Total = 75.9 Coal <1 11.3 (11%) 90 Electric power sectorb Nuclear 100 8.5 (8%) Electricity retail sales 12.8 (35%) Total = 100.2 Electrical system energy losses 24.3 (65%) Total = 37.1 a Primary energy consumption. Each energy source is measured in different physical content of electricity retail sales. See Note 1, "Electrical System Energy Losses," at the end of units and converted to common British thermal units (Btu). See U.S. Energy Information EIA’s Monthly Energy Review, Section 2. Administration (EIA), Monthly Energy Review, Appendix A. Noncombustible renewable c End-use sector consumption of primary energy and electricity retail sales, excluding electrical energy sources are converted to Btu using the “Fossil Fuel Equivalency Approach”, see system energy losses from electricity retail sales. Industrial and commercial sectors EIA’s Monthly Energy Review, Appendix E. consumption includes primary energy consumption by combined-heat-and-power (CHP) and b The electric power sector includes electricity-only and combined-heat-and-power (CHP) electricity-only plants contained within the sector. plants whose primary business is to sell electricity, or electricity and heat, to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • WTI Crude Oil West Texas Intermediate
    WTI Crude Oil West Texas Intermediate Alexander Filitz Minh Khoa Nguyen Outline • Crude Oil • Value Chain • Politics • Market • Demand • Facts & Figures • Discussion Crude Oil • Flammable liquid consisting of a complex mixture of hydrocarbons of various molecular weights and other liquid organic compounds • Is recovered mostly through oil drilling • In its strictest sense, petroleum includes only crude oil, but in common usage it includes all liquid, gaseous, and solid hydrocarbons. • An oil well produces predominantly crude oil, with some natural gas dissolved in it Classification • By the geographic location it is produced in • Its API gravity (an oil industry measure of density) • Its sulfur content • Some of the common reference crudes are: • West Texas Intermediate (WTI), a very high-quality, sweet, light oil delivered at Cushing, Oklahoma for North American oil. • Brent Blend, comprising 15 oils from fields in the North Sea. • Dubai-Oman, used as benchmark for Middle East sour crude oil flowing to the Asia-Pacific region • The OPEC Reference Basket, a weighted average of oil blends from various OPEC (The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) countries West Texas Intermediate • Also known as Texas light sweet, used as a benchmark in oil pricing • API gravity of around 39.6 and specific gravity of 0.827 and 0.24% sulfur • WTI is refined mostly in the Midwest and Gulf Coast regions in the U.S • It is the underlying commodity of New York Mercantile Exchange's (NYMEX) oil futures contracts • Often referenced in news reports
    [Show full text]
  • ARIZONA ENERGY FACT SHEET Energy Efficiency & Energy Consumption April 2016
    ARIZONA ENERGY FACT SHEET Energy Efficiency & Energy Consumption April 2016 An Overview of Energy Efficiency Quick Facts: Energy efficiency means reducing the amount of energy Population, 2014: 6,731,484 that you need to perform a particular task. When you Population growth rate, 2006-2014: 0.79% per year practice energy efficiency, you increase or maintain your Number of households, 2014: 2,387,246 level of service, but you decrease the energy used to Source: United States Census Bureau. provide that service through efficient technologies. Examples include ENERGY STAR appliances, compact fluorescent and LED light bulbs, better insulation for Primary Energy Consumption (2013) buildings, more efficient windows, high efficiency air Primary energy consumption: 1,415 trillion Btu conditioning equipment, and vehicles with higher miles Growth rate, 2006-2013: -0.57% per year per gallon (mpg). Another distinct strategy is energy con- servation, which means that you change your behavior or Primary energy consumption per capita: 213 million Btu lifestyle to reduce energy use. Examples include carpool- Ranking, energy consumption per capita: 43 ing, using mass transit, turning thermostats down in the Ranking, total energy consumption: 27 winter and up in summer, and other behavioral changes. Ratio of consumption to production: 2.38 Improving energy efficiency is a “win-win” strategy — Energy Expenditures (2013) it saves money for consumers and businesses, reduces the need for costly and controversial new power plants, Total energy expenditures: $ 22.8 billion increases the reliability of energy supply, cuts pollution Ranking, energy expenditures: 23 and greenhouse gas emissions, and lowers energy Energy expenditures per capita: $ 3,434 imports.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Insights Report
    Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Insights Report Partners XxxxContents Introduction 3 Five key findings 5 Key finding 1: Staying within 1.5°C means companies must 6 keep oil and gas in the ground Key finding 2: Smoke and mirrors: companies are deflecting 8 attention from their inaction and ineffective climate strategies Key finding 3: Greatest contributors to climate change show 11 limited recognition of emissions responsibility through targets and planning Key finding 4: Empty promises: companies’ capital 12 expenditure in low-carbon technologies not nearly enough Key finding 5:National oil companies: big emissions, 16 little transparency, virtually no accountability Ranking 19 Module Summaries 25 Module 1: Targets 25 Module 2: Material Investment 28 Module 3: Intangible Investment 31 Module 4: Sold Products 32 Module 5: Management 34 Module 6: Supplier Engagement 37 Module 7: Client Engagement 39 Module 8: Policy Engagement 41 Module 9: Business Model 43 CLIMATE AND ENERGY BENCHMARK IN OIL AND GAS - INSIGHTS REPORT 2 Introduction Our world needs a major decarbonisation and energy transformation to WBA’s Climate and Energy Benchmark measures and ranks the world’s prevent the climate crisis we’re facing and meet the Paris Agreement goal 100 most influential oil and gas companies on their low-carbon transition. of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Without urgent climate action, we will The Oil and Gas Benchmark is the first comprehensive assessment experience more extreme weather events, rising sea levels and immense of companies in the oil and gas sector using the International Energy negative impacts on ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Propositions About Property Rights and Environmental Protection*
    COLE_FINAL_PAGEPROOF2 09/13/00 8:56 AM View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Duke Law Scholarship Repository CLEARING THE AIR: FOUR PROPOSITIONS ABOUT PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION* DANIEL H. COLE** INTRODUCTION Privatization is sweeping the globe.1 Since the Reagan-Thatcher revolution of the 1980s, governments around the world have been selling off public assets to private owners in order to improve effi- ciency and increase production. Between 1985 and 1994, $468 billion worth of state enterprises were sold off to private investors.2 But pri- vatization so far has been limited to state enterprises. Governments have not, with a few notable and highly controversial exceptions,3 be- * This article combines and elaborates on ideas developed in two previous works: Daniel H. Cole, Property Rights on Environmental Goods, in 1 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LAW AND ECONOMICS (Boudewijn Bouckaert & Gerrit de Geest eds., forthcoming Sept. 2000); and DANIEL H. COLE, INSTITUTING ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: FROM RED TO GREEN IN POLAND (1998). ** M. Dale Palmer Professor of Law, Indiana University School of Law—Indianapolis. J.S.D., Stanford Law School; J.D., Northwestern School of Law, Lewis & Clark College; A.M., University of Chicago; A.B., Occidental College. Please direct questions or comments to [email protected]. This article is also available at <http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/10DELPFCole>. 1. The term “privatization,” as used throughout the law and economics literature, encom- passes a wide variety of activities by which some public entity conveys property rights to some private entity or entities—everything from outright giveaways or sales of public lands to the granting of licenses or concessions under which private firms finance, construct, or manage ho- tels, airports, wastewater treatment plants, highways, prisons, and schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Dealer Supplemental Application
    FUEL DEALER SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION Applicant: Address: Owner and/or Manager responsible for daily operations: Website: FEIN: US DOT #: Date established: Proposed policy effective date: Business type: Sole Proprietor C-Corporation S-Corporation Partnership Current Carrier Line of Coverage Current Premiums Business Operations (check all that apply) Auto Service & Repair Convenience Stores HVAC Installation or Repair Bulk Oil Sales Fuel Distributor/Dealer LP Bulk Storage Bulk Storage (gas, diesel) Home Heating Fuel Propane Distributor Common Carrier Other: 1. Any other entities, subsidiaries, joint ventures or partnerships associated with applicant? Yes No 2. What is the name and title of individual responsible for safety program? How many years of experience in this role? Contact information: SECTION I – FUEL DEALER GENERAL INFORMATION 1. How many years has current management been in place? 2. Has there been a merger or acquisition with another business entity within the past 3 years? Yes No 3. Does the Applicant have formal hiring practices to include: a. Documented interviews? Yes No b. Formal background checks? Yes No c. Reference checks? Yes No 4. Does the Applicant business include any of the following: a. Any fuel brought in by or delivered to boats or barges? Yes No b. Any hauling, storage, and/or disposal of waste oil, pool water, or asphalt? Yes No c. Any sale of racing fuel? Yes No If Yes: % d. Any direct fueling of aircraft? Yes No e. Any direct fueling of watercraft? Yes No f. Any direct fueling of locomotives? Yes No g. Any operations involving anhydrous ammonia? Yes No h. Any operations related to converting vehicles to propane power for Applicant’s use or other’s? Yes No i.
    [Show full text]
  • BP Code of Conduct – English
    Our Code Our responsibility Code of Conduct Guiding you to make the right decisions Our values and behaviours are the foundation of our Code What we value Safety Safety is good business. Everything we do relies upon the safety of our workforce and the communities around us. We care about the safe management of the environment. We are committed to safely delivering energy to the world. Respect We respect the world in which we operate. It begins with compliance with laws and regulations. We hold ourselves to the highest ethical standards and behave in ways that earn the trust of others. We depend on the relationships we have and respect each other and those we work with. We value diversity of people and thought. We care about the consequences of our decisions, large and small, on those around us. Excellence We are in a hazardous business and are committed to excellence through the systematic and disciplined management of our operations. We follow and uphold the rules and standards we set for our company. We commit to quality outcomes, have a thirst to learn and to improve. If something is not right, we correct it. Courage What we do is rarely easy. Achieving the best outcomes often requires the courage to face difficulty, to speak up and stand by what we believe. We always strive to do the right thing. We explore new ways of thinking and are unafraid to ask for help. We are honest with ourselves and actively seek feedback from others. We aim for an enduring legacy, despite the short-term priorities of our world.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil & Gas Risk Service
    IHS ENERGY Oil & Gas Risk Service Why IHS Energy Oil and Gas Providing a global view of Risk Service? comparative investment risks in • An oil & gas industry - focused approach to risk assessment across the upstream oil and gas sector 130 producing and frontier territories. Analysis and monitoring of above-ground • Created and produced by petroleum factors that affect the profitability of E&P capital sector experts. investments and continuing operations. • Designed specifically for use in oil & gas industry workflows The Oil and Gas Risk Service (OGRS) provides executives in corporate strategy - from new business and risk management, business development and new ventures, and corporate to strategy to portfolio security with forward-looking analysis on above-ground petroleum sector risks in and risk evaluation. hydrocarbon producing and frontier countries. OGRS analysis is built around our proprietary risk methodology, which evaluates 130 countries and territories against 21 factors to offer clients an objective and systematic way to compare risk between Clients Receive: countries and at different stages of the investment cycle. • Timely, essential OGRS clients receive timely briefs and research notes on current events and expert analysis, developments influencing the above-ground upstream risk environment, incorporating IHS as well as in-depth special reports and quarterly presentations. These features Energy data, work together to create a comprehensive view enabling clients to understand, forecasts and mapping tools. manage and mitigate risk in new country entry, project assessment, portfolio evaluation, and strategic planning. • Insight into the dynamics shaping policy choices in producing countries and emerging exploration frontiers. • Identification of future points of risk and the impact on upstream investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Packaging Machinery in China
    INDUSTRY MARKET RESEARCH FOR BUSINESS LEADERS, STRATEGISTS, DECISION MAKERS CLICK TO VIEW Table of Contents 2 List of Tables & Charts 3 Study Overview 4 Sample Text, Table & Chart 5 Sample Profile, Table & Forecast 6 Order Form 7 photo courtesy of Ciba About Freedonia, Custom Research, Related Studies, Corporate Use License 8 Packaging Machinery in China Industry Study with Forecasts for 2014 & 2019 Study #2638 | May 2010 | $5300 | 211 pages The Freedonia Group 767 Beta Drive www.freedoniagroup.com Cleveland, OH • 44143-2326 • USA Toll Free US Tel: 800.927.5900 or +1 440.684.9600 Fax: +1 440.646.0484 E-mail: [email protected] Study #2638 May 2010 Packaging Machinery in China $5300 211 Pages Industry Study with Forecasts for 2014 & 2019 Table of Contents Food ..................................................... 73 Northwest ......................................... 131 Fruits & Vegetables .............................. 75 Overview ....................................... 131 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Bakery & Confectionery ......................... 76 Packaging Machinery Demand ........... 133 Meat Products ..................................... 77 MARKET ENVIRONMENT Other Food Products ............................. 77 INDUSTRY STRUCTURE Beverages .............................................. 78 General ...................................................4 Beer & Alcohol .................................... 80 General ............................................... 136 Economic Overview ....................................4 Milk ..................................................
    [Show full text]