DOCSLIB.ORG

Habitat Conservation Plan for Elk Hills Oil & Gas Field

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Habitat Conservation Plan for Elk Hills Oil & Gas Field INITIAL STUDY / ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Habitat Conservation Plan For Elk Hills Oil & Gas Field Kern County, CA LEAD AGENCY: Department of Fish and Game 1234 East Shaw Avenue Fresno, CA 93710 Contact: Julie Vance (559) 243-4005 (Ext. 141) CONSULTANT: 5080 California Ave., Suite 400 Bakersfield, CA 93309-1697 Contact: Nina Hostmark (661) 616-2600 June 2009 INITIAL STUDY / ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Habitat Conservation Plan For Elk Hills Oil & Gas Field Kern County, CA LEAD AGENCY: Department of Fish and Game 1234 East Shaw Avenue Fresno, CA 93710 Contact: Julie Vance (559) 243-4014 (Ext. 222) CONSULTANT: 5080 California Ave., Suite 400 Bakersfield, CA 93309-1697 Contact: Nina Hostmark (661) 616-2600 June 2009 Initial Study Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents........................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. iii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations............................................................................................. iv Section 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose .............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Background .......................................................................................................1-3 1.3 Regulatory Setting .............................................................................................1-5 1.4 Program EIR and Subsequent Environmental Review......................................1-8 1.5 Previous Environmental Documents .................................................................1-9 Section 2.0 Project Description ........................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Project Location..................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................2-2 2.4 Description of Project Analyzed in 1997 SEIS/PEIR ..........................................2-5 2.4.1 1997 SEIS/PEIR and Associated Impacts................................................2-6 2.4.2 1997 SEIS/PEIR Mitigation Monitoring Program ......................................2-7 2.5 Description of the New Project (Proposed ITP)................................................2-10 2.5.1 Covered Activities...................................................................................2-10 2.5.2 Covered Lands .......................................................................................2-12 2.5.3 Covered Species ....................................................................................2-13 2.5.4 ITP Permittee..........................................................................................2-16 2.5.5 Habitat Disturbance Envelope ................................................................2-17 2.6 Gap Analysis....................................................................................................2-17 2.6.1 Projected Oil Field Activities ...................................................................2-18 2.6.2 Habitat Disturbance Envelope ................................................................2-19 2.7 Intended Uses of This Document .....................................................................2-21 Section 3.0 Environmental Checklist .................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected........................................................3-1 3.2 Environmental Determination.............................................................................3-1 3.3 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts .................................................................3-2 Notice of Preparation for i June 2009 The Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field HCP Initial Study Table of Contents Section 4.0 Discussion of Environmental Evaluation........................................ 4-1 4.1 Aesthetics...........................................................................................................4-3 4.2 Agricultural Resources.......................................................................................4-6 4.3 Air Quality.........................................................................................................4-23 4.4 Biological Resources ........................................................................................4-48 4.5 Cultural Resources...........................................................................................4-75 4.6 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................4-89 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions...........................................................................4-104 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................4-108 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality..........................................................................4-137 4.10 Land Use and Planning ..................................................................................4-157 4.11 Mineral Resources..........................................................................................4-162 4.12 Noise..............................................................................................................4-166 4.13 Population and Housing .................................................................................4-177 4.14 Public Services...............................................................................................4-181 4.15 Recreation......................................................................................................4-190 4.16 Transportation/Traffic.....................................................................................4-192 4.17 Utilities and Service Systems .........................................................................4-205 4.18 Energy Conservation ......................................................................................4-217 4.19 Mandatory Findings of Significance................................................................4-224 References ........................................................................................................... 4-225 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 EHOF Unit Land Map....................................................................................1-12 Figure 2.2 EHOF Site Vicinity Map ................................................................................2-22 Figure 2.3 EHOF Legal Land Description ......................................................................2-23 Figure 2.4a EHOF Conservation Lands ...........................................................................2-24 Figure 2.4b EHOF Regional Context Map ..…………………………………….….............2-25 Figure 4.2a EHOF Kern County Important Farmland.......................................................4-17 Figure 4.2b EHOF Kern County General Plan Land Use Map.........................................4-18 Figure 4.2b-1 EHOF Kern County General Plan Land Use Elk Hills...................................4-19 Figure 4.2c EHOF Kern County Zoning Map ...................................................................4-20 Figure 4.2c-1 EHOF Kern County Zoning Map Elk Hills......................................................4-21 Figure 4.2d EHOF Williamson Act Lands Map.................................................................4-22 Figure 4.3 EHOF Elk Hills Historical Production and Case Projection...........................4-47 Figure 4.4a EHOF Utilities Map .......................................................................................4-73 Figure 4.4b EHOF CNDDB Sensitive Natural Community Observations.........................4-74 Figure 4.8a EHOF Public Facilities Map ........................................................................4-118 Figure 4.8b EHOF Airport Compatibility Land Use Map.................................................4-129 Figure 4.9 EHOF Floodplain Map ................................................................................4-156 Notice of Preparation for ii June 2009 The Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field HCP Initial Study Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES Table 2.5-1 Covered Special Status Species, Potential to Occur .......................................2-15 Table 2.5-2 Covered Special Status Plants, Potential to Occur ..........................................2-16 Table 2.6-1 Total Acreage Disturbance Envelopes: 1997 SEIS/PEIR versus Elk Hills Oil field Proposed ITP ...........................................................................................2-19 Table 2.6-2 Pre-Sale and Future Conditions For EHOF (Developed/Undisturbed Acres) . 2-20 Table 4.2-1 Williamson Act Lands .......................................................................................4-12 Table 4.3-1 Stationary Source Emissions............................................................................4-34 Table 4.3-2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PACIFIC PETROLEUM CEOLOCIST NEWSLETTER of the Pacific Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists JANUARY 1997 NO.7
    Page 1 1997 No.7 PACIFIC PETROLEUM CEOLOCIST NEWSLETTER of the Pacific Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists JANUARY 1997 NO.7 IAMESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT I In my last two columns I acquainted you with two and Texas. We appreciate his long and continued in­ thirds of the Pacific Section Executive Committee and volvement in the Pacific Section. the work they are doing for our professional society. The remainder of the Executive Committee will be the JackWest (Epoch) is a past President of the Pacific Sec­ grist for this column. tion (1988-89). In addition to working on convention committees, he recently was ourliaison to the National Vic Church (Consultant) has been active in the local AAPG Advisory Council and is currently the represen­ and National AAPG since long before I met him. His tative on the Executive Committee for the California interest in the preservation of cores caused him to be in Well Sample Repository. on the planning and opening of the California Well Sample Repository at Cal State Bakersfield. He has As you hopefully have noticed in reading mylast three championed the cause of core preservation at the Na­ columns, there are many geologists in the Pacific Sec­ tional AAPG level as well and keptus apprised oftheir tion AAPG who feel it is worth while to spendsome of efforts. Hehas most recently been the chair ofthe Hon­ their time keeping ourprofessional society intact. These ors and Awards Committee for the Pacific Section, a people are some of the hardest working andmost gen­ position he resigned as I was writing this column.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithologic Characteristics of Pliocene Rocks Cored at Elk Hills, Kern County, California
    Lithologic Characteristics of Pliocene Rocks Cored at Elk Hills, Kern County, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1332-D Lithologic Characteristics of Pliocene Rocks Cored at Elk Hills, Kern County, California By WILLIAM M. BERRYMAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1332-D A complete sequence of Pliocene rocks cored in Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 1 well324-19R is established as a reference section for subsurface Pliocene rocks in the Elk Hills oil field UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-600064 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. 20402 Stock Number 2401-00317 CONTENTS Page Abstract...................................................................................................................... Dl Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Purpose of report ............................................................................................ 2 Drilling summary ............................................................................................ 4 Methods of investigation ................................................................................ 4 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................ 5 Stratigraphy
    [Show full text]
  • OIL and GAS PRODUCTION History in California
    OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION History in California OIL California oil was always a valued commodity. When the Spanish explorers landed in California in the 1500s, they found Indians gathering asphaltum (very thick oil) from natural seeps. The asphaltum was used for many purposes, including waterproof- ing baskets, making wooden canoes, called “tomols,” fastening arrowheads to shafts, and decorating objects—usually with shells affixed to the asphaltum. The explorers, in turn, used asphaltum to seal seams in their ships. Later settlers also used the thick asphaltum in many ways, including sealing the roofs of their houses. As pioneers continued to arrive and settle, the number of oil seeps they discovered in California naturally increased. In Northern California, people were interested in the oil seeps in Humboldt, Colusa, Santa Clara, and San Mateo Counties, and in the asphaltum seeps and bituminous residues in A natural tar seep in Ventura County. Seeps are ephemeral, Mendocino, Marin, Contra Costa, Santa Clara, and transitory features appearing and disappearing through the Santa Cruz Counties. Oil from a Humboldt County years on no apparent schedule. Over 500 onshore seeps are seep was sold in 1855, four years before Colonel documented in the division publication Onshore Oil and Gas Seeps in California. Additional information is on the Drake drilled America’s first oil well in Pennsylva- Internet at http://seeps.wr.usgs.gov/ nia.4 In Southern California, large seeps in Ventura, Santa a number of California settlers probably collected oil Barbara, Kern, and Los Angeles Counties received from seeps and distilled it into lamp oil. The first the most attention.
    [Show full text]
  • October 1994 U.S. Department of Energy Naval Petroleum
    DOEEA-(0962) BLM EA # CA-016-93-140 BLM R/W SEWNO. CA 31330 JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND ROUTINE OPERATION OF A 12-KILOVOLT (KV) OVERHEAD POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND FORMAL AUTHORIZATION FOR A 10-INCH AND 8-INCH FRESH WATER PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY, NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVE NO. 1, KERN COUNTY, CALFORNIA OCTOBER 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES IN CALIFORNIA U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT CALIENTE RESOURCE AREA . DISCLAIMER This report was .prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. .i DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. TABLEOF CONTENTS TABLEOFCONTENTS ............................................... i LISTOFFIGURES ................................................. ii INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1 1. 0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION .................... 4 2.0 ALTEFOJATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION .................
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Fractured Politics: The Evolution of Oil and Gas Well Stimulation Regulation in California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9jz0q3zj Author Dorr, Adam John Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Fractured Politics: The Evolution of Oil and Gas Well Stimulation Regulation in California A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Planning by Adam John Dorr 2017 © Copyright by Adam John Dorr 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Fractured Politics: The Evolution of Oil and Gas Well Stimulation Regulation in California by Adam John Dorr Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Planning University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Susanna B. Hecht, Chair California has been an oil and gas state throughout its history. In the latter half of 19th Century and first half of the 20th Century, hydrocarbon extraction helped define both Californian prosperity and the early promise of the West. Many decades later, the Energy Act of 2005 helped to revitalize domestic oil and gas production by exempting a suite of new “enhanced recovery techniques” for well stimulation, commonly referred to as “fracking”, under major federal environmental regulations. This dissertation research engages the subsoil political ecology of California’s petroleum sector in order to explain how well stimulation regulation evolved in California following the rapid deployment of fracking technology across the country that ii triggered a decade of “Shale Revolution” beginning in 2006. Well stimulation in California represents a case study of the intensely politicized and contested evolution of extractive regimes and their environmental governance at subnational scales in the wake of disruptive technological change.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 CCST Report
    California Council on Science and Technology Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Pacific Institute August 28, 2014 Advanced Well Stimulation Technologies in California An Independent Review of Scientific and Technical Information California Council on Science and Technology Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Pacific Institute August 28, 2014 Acknowledgments This report has been prepared for the California Council on Science and Technology (CCST) with funding from the United States Bureau of Land Management. Copyright Copyright 2014 by the California Council on Science and Technology ISBN number: 978-1-930117-93-8 Advanced Well Stimulation Technologies in California: An Independent Review of Scientific and Technical Information About CCST CCST is a non-profit organization established in 1988 at the request of the California State Government and sponsored by the major public and private postsecondary institutions of California and affiliate federal laboratories in conjunction with leading private-sector firms. CCST’s mission is to improve science and technology policy and application in California by proposing programs, conducting analyses, and recommending public policies and initiatives that will maintain California’s technological leadership and a vigorous economy. Note The California Council on Science and Technology (CCST) has made every reasonable effort to assure the accuracy of the information in this publication. However, the contents of this publication are subject to changes, omissions, and errors, and CCST does not accept
    [Show full text]
  • 2020.11.09 BLM Protest Letter FINAL
    XAVIER BECERRA State of California Attorney General DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1515 CLAY STREET, 20TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 70550 OAKLAND, CA 94612-0550 Public: (510) 879-1300 Telephone: (510) 879-1002 Facsimile: (510) 622-2270 E-Mail: [email protected] November 9, 2020 Via ePlanning Website Submission Karen Mouritsen Bureau of Land Management California State Office ATTN: Oil and Gas Lease Sale 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-1623 Sacramento, CA 95825 RE: Protest of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, California State Office, December 2020 Oil and Gas Lease Sale Dear Ms. Mouritsen: On behalf of the Attorney General of California, Xavier Becerra, the Governor of California, Gavin Newsom, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”), we submit the following protest of the Bureau of Land Management’s (“BLM”) proposed December 2020 Oil and Gas Lease Sale (“Lease Sale”) involving seven parcels totaling 4,133.58 acres of Federal public lands and mineral estate within the Bakersfield Field Office in Kern County, California. BLM is proposing to make these parcels available for sale via an online open auction on December 10, 2020, and announced a 30- day public protest period ending on November 9, 2020. Pursuant to 43 C.F.R. § 3120.1-3, we protest the inclusion of all seven parcels proposed for sale: CACA Serial Number Corresponding Parcel ID Acreage CACA 059099 CA-2020-12-0001 538.06 CACA 059101 CA-2020-12-0002 160.00 CACA 059103 CA-2020-12-0003 920.00 CACA 059102 CA-2020-12-0004 957.24 CACA 059105 CA-2020-12-0005 680.00 CACA 059104 CA-2020-12-0006 600.00 CACA 059100 CA-2020-12-0007 278.28 Protest of BLM Oil and Gas Lease Sale November 9, 2020 Page 2 The mailing addresses to which correspondence regarding this protest should be directed are: California Attorney General’s Office ATTN: George Torgun 1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Fractured Politics
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Fractured Politics: The Evolution of Oil and Gas Well Stimulation Regulation in California A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Planning by Adam John Dorr 2017 © Copyright by Adam John Dorr 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Fractured Politics: The Evolution of Oil and Gas Well Stimulation Regulation in California by Adam John Dorr Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Planning University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Susanna B. Hecht, Chair California has been an oil and gas state throughout its history. In the latter half of 19th Century and first half of the 20th Century, hydrocarbon extraction helped define both Californian prosperity and the early promise of the West. Many decades later, the Energy Act of 2005 helped to revitalize domestic oil and gas production by exempting a suite of new “enhanced recovery techniques” for well stimulation, commonly referred to as “fracking”, under major federal environmental regulations. This dissertation research engages the subsoil political ecology of California’s petroleum sector in order to explain how well stimulation regulation evolved in California following the rapid deployment of fracking technology across the country that ii triggered a decade of “Shale Revolution” beginning in 2006. Well stimulation in California represents a case study of the intensely politicized and contested evolution of extractive regimes and their environmental governance at subnational scales in the wake of disruptive technological change. The embedded single-case design employed in this research targets two units of analysis: regulation and frames. Regulation is analyzed using Governance and Political Economy Analysis to assess the structural, institutional, and stakeholder dynamics of California’s oil and gas sector, while frames are analyzed using Frame Analysis of news media and semi-structured open-ended interviews to examine how discourse coalitions construct narratives with which to advance their agendas.
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquin Kit Fox (Vulpes Macrotis Mutica) 5-Year Review
    San Joaquin Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo: Joseph Terry, USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office Sacramento, California Date Signed at Sacramento FWO 5-YEAR REVIEW San Joaquin Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotis ssp. mutica) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. The San Joaquin kit fox (kit fox) was listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Preservation Act in 1967, so was not subject to the current listing processes and, therefore, did not include an analysis of threats to the kit fox. However, a review of Federal and State agency materials written at the time of listing indicates that listing was in fact based on the existence of threats that are attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospective Application of Well Stimulation Technologies in California
    Chapter 4: Prospective Application of Well Stimulation Technologies in California Prospective Application of Well Stimulation Technologies in California Authored by Patrick Dobson (LBNL) This section provides a brief introduction to petroleum systems, followed by a review of key hydrocarbon source rocks (typically shales) associated with petroleum systems found within onshore California sedimentary basins. Key aspects of the geology will also be discussed, such as the tectonic and structural features that have affected basin development and diagenetic processes impacting the types of minerals formed and rock properties. Where available, data describing the rock properties will be summarized. This is followed by a brief description of the Bakken Formation in the Williston Basin, from which significant unconventional shale oil production is occurring in North Dakota, along with a comparison with the Monterey Formation in California. This is followed by descriptions of the major sedimentary basins in California, along with a discussion of the results of exploration activities in deep portions of these basins, where hydrocarbon source rocks are within the oil window. The section concludes with some general observations regarding the potential application of unconventional techniques to oil-bearing shales in California. 4.1 Overview of Significant Findings Oil-bearing sedimentary basins in California are relatively young in geologic time, but are structurally complex due to the presence of a very dynamic transform plate boundary, currently represented by the San Andreas Fault System. The dominant source rock for hydrocarbon generation in many of these basins is the Monterey Formation, a thick Miocene age sequence of marine sediments consisting of siliceous, phosphatic, organic, and clay-rich shales and mudstones, dolomites, and intercalated turbiditic sandstones.
    [Show full text]
  • Depositional Environment of the Basal Etchegoin Formation
    Copyright By Carol Leigh Beahm 2015 Depositional Environment of the Basal Etchegoin Formation within the Poso Creek Oil Field, Kern County, California A Thesis By Carol Beahm Submitted to the Department of Geological Sciences, California State University Bakersfield In partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Masters of Geology Fall 2015 Depositional Environment of the Basal Etchegoin Formation within the Poso Creek Oil Field, Kern County, California By Carol Beahm This thesis has been accepted on behalf of the Department of Geological Science by the members of the supervisory committee: ' ' Dr. Janice Gillespie Committee Chair J Committee Kenneth Frost, Linn Energy Committee Member Acknowledgements I owe much to Linn Energy (formerly Berry Petroleum) for allowing me the use of their data, resources, and time for the completion of this paper. In particular, I would like to thank my Asset Manager, Greg Wagner, for not becoming entirely too impatient during the course of time spent on this project and for encouraging me and directing me all the way through. I would also like to thank Ken Frost for acting as a geologic mentor and thesis advisor for these many years. I would like to thank my professors Jan Gillespie and Rob Negrini. Not only for serving as committee members, but for being my advisors and mentors for over a decade now and for giving me much of the geologic knowledge I have today. The Well Repository at CSUB provided the core data necessary for this project. This is a wonderful source for any local geologic study. And a special dedication to my family.
    [Show full text]