UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Fractured Politics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Fractured Politics UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Fractured Politics: The Evolution of Oil and Gas Well Stimulation Regulation in California A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Planning by Adam John Dorr 2017 © Copyright by Adam John Dorr 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Fractured Politics: The Evolution of Oil and Gas Well Stimulation Regulation in California by Adam John Dorr Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Planning University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Susanna B. Hecht, Chair California has been an oil and gas state throughout its history. In the latter half of 19th Century and first half of the 20th Century, hydrocarbon extraction helped define both Californian prosperity and the early promise of the West. Many decades later, the Energy Act of 2005 helped to revitalize domestic oil and gas production by exempting a suite of new “enhanced recovery techniques” for well stimulation, commonly referred to as “fracking”, under major federal environmental regulations. This dissertation research engages the subsoil political ecology of California’s petroleum sector in order to explain how well stimulation regulation evolved in California following the rapid deployment of fracking technology across the country that ii triggered a decade of “Shale Revolution” beginning in 2006. Well stimulation in California represents a case study of the intensely politicized and contested evolution of extractive regimes and their environmental governance at subnational scales in the wake of disruptive technological change. The embedded single-case design employed in this research targets two units of analysis: regulation and frames. Regulation is analyzed using Governance and Political Economy Analysis to assess the structural, institutional, and stakeholder dynamics of California’s oil and gas sector, while frames are analyzed using Frame Analysis of news media and semi-structured open-ended interviews to examine how discourse coalitions construct narratives with which to advance their agendas. This dissertation research contributes to the academic literatures relating to energy systems and their sociotechnical transitions by situating the case of well stimulation regulation in California within the substantive, theoretical, and philosophical debates surrounding the environmental governance of extraction. iii The dissertation of Adam John Dorr is approved. Paul M. Ong Randall D. Crane Franklin D. Gilliam, Jr. Susanna B. Hecht, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2017 iv For my grandparents and parents who led the way, for my wife who travelled with me, and for my children so they may follow. v Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. x Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................... xiv Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Problem Statement ...................................................................................................................... 2 Research Questions ..................................................................................................................... 4 Dissertation Structure.................................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 2. Background ................................................................................................................... 7 The Shale Revolution .................................................................................................................. 7 Enhanced Recovery Techniques, Well Stimulation, and Fracking ........................................... 12 Perforating............................................................................................................................. 16 Waterflooding ....................................................................................................................... 24 Chemical Flooding ................................................................................................................ 26 Hydraulic Fracturing ............................................................................................................. 30 Acidizing ............................................................................................................................... 34 Thermal ................................................................................................................................. 35 Gas Injection ......................................................................................................................... 36 Directional Drilling ............................................................................................................... 36 Well Completion and Flowback ............................................................................................... 40 Environmental Impact ............................................................................................................... 42 Geographic Footprint ............................................................................................................ 43 Air Pollution.......................................................................................................................... 45 Water Pollution, Soil Contamination, and Waste Management ........................................... 46 Noise Pollution...................................................................................................................... 50 Water and Resource Use ....................................................................................................... 52 Induced Seismicity ................................................................................................................ 54 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change ................................................................. 56 Chapter 3. Literature Review ........................................................................................................ 59 Political Ecology ....................................................................................................................... 59 Political Ecology of the Subsurface ...................................................................................... 63 Political Ecology of Fracking ............................................................................................... 65 Adaptive Governance................................................................................................................ 69 Anticipatory Governance .......................................................................................................... 72 vi Sociotechnical Transitions ........................................................................................................ 74 Media Framing .......................................................................................................................... 77 Framing Fracking .................................................................................................................. 80 Chapter 4: California Historical Context ...................................................................................... 82 Pre-History and Early Years of Oil and Gas in California ....................................................... 82 Drilling for Oil .......................................................................................................................... 87 The Standard Model .................................................................................................................. 91 Natural Gas ............................................................................................................................... 94 California Begins Producing Oil ............................................................................................. 100 New Petroleum Products for New Markets ............................................................................ 107 The Los Angeles City Oil Field .............................................................................................. 108 Oil Beyond the Los Angeles and Ventura Fields .................................................................... 112 The Monterey Shale Formation .............................................................................................. 122 Tidelands and Offshore Oil ..................................................................................................... 126 The Santa Barbara Oil Spill of 1969 ....................................................................................... 131 Natural Gas in California ........................................................................................................ 138 Enhanced Recovery Techniques in California ........................................................................ 139 Property Rights and Taxation ................................................................................................. 142 Chapter 5. Methodology ............................................................................................................. 146 Rationale ................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Jurnal IAFMI 03 09 Lowres.Pdf
    << 1 JURNAL IAFMI 03 DESEMBER 2015 ISSN 2442 8515 JURNAL IAFMI 03 DESEMBER 2015 >> 2 Membangun knowledge database yang kedepannya diharapkan dapat menjadi referensi utama ilmu dan teknologi dibidang fasilitas produksi migas di Indonesia, serta referensi kondisi lokal untuk International Codes. Mendorong para professional dan akademisi dibidang fasilitas produksi migas untuk menerbitkan karya dan pemikirannya sehingga kompetensi dan keahliannya terangkat ke permukaan dunia industri migas. Menjalin jaringan keilmuan dan teknologi untuk mengembangkan industri nasional dibidang fasilitas produksi migas. JURNAL IAFMI Mengangkat aktifitas sumberdaya Misi pendukung industri infrastruktur migas ke permukaan. NEXT EDITION << 3 JURNAL IAFMI 03 DESEMBER 2015 TEMA Pengajuan makalah: 1 Januari 2016 - 31 Maret 2016 melalui email ke: [email protected] BERALIH KE ENERGI TERBARUKAN STRATEGI, PELUANG DAN TANTANGAN 1. Isi makalah dibuat dengan kategori sebagai berikut: a. Ringkasan Thesis / Skripsi S1/S2/S3, min 500 kata, maks 1500 kata atau maksimum 5 halaman termasuk gambar. b. Paparan / Analisa / Review Teknologi/Metoda/Teori/Aturan yang diterapkan dalam sebuah proyek/program yang sudah atau sedang dilaksanakan di Indonesia, min 1000 kata, maks 2500 kata atau maksimum 8 halaman termasuk gambar c. Paparan / Analisa / Review atas teknologi/Metoda/Teori/Aturan baru yang belum diterapkan di Indonesia (mungkin sudah diterapkan di luar negeri), min 1000 kata, maks 2500 kata atau maksimum 8 halaman termasuk gambar 2. Persyaratan jumlah kata di atas dihitung dalam ukurun kertas A4 dengan margin standar dengan font Calibri ukuran 12 dan spasi exact 17pt. 3. Tema makalah adalah Fasilitas Produksi Migas, Fasilitas Produksi Migas, Beralih ke Energi Terbarukan - Strategi, Peluang dan Tantangan. 4. Makalah dapat dibuat sendiri atau secara berkelompok.
    [Show full text]
  • Turning Green the Strategic
    Turning green the strategic way Turning green the strategic way The role and potential of strategic environmental assessment in securing a green economy Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is a powerful process for integrating environmental and linked social and economic concerns into policy-making, planning, programme development, mega projects and development decision-making. Over the last 20 years there has been increasing uptake of SEA around the world. More than 60 countries at all levels of development (including all 27 EU member states) now have legislation, policies, directives or regulations prescribing the application of SEA, and many more are introducing it as part of their policy toolkits – although it is not necessarily used effectively and many development actors are unaware of its function, value and potential. At the UN Rio+20 conference in 2012, the emergent green economy concept was a central theme, but it was agreed that nationally (as opposed to globally) driven approaches should be the way forward, so that green economy policies can be properly tailored. Attention has therefore turned to how SEA can help in promoting a transition to green economic development. This paper provides a preliminary exploration of the links between SEA and green economy, and the role of SEA in supporting decision-making for green growth in relation to a range of entry points: government policies, plans and programmes; climate change and low-carbon growth; sustainable transport; waste management, water and sanitation; ecosystems and sustainable use of biodiversity; sustainable agriculture/food production and supply; green energy and trade. It also discusses the use of indicators in monitoring SEA and the treatment of social concerns, particularly gender.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodturning Magazine Index 1
    Woodturning Magazine Index 1 Mag Page Woodturning Magazine - Index - Issues 1 - 271 No. No. TYPE TITLE AUTHOR Types of articles are grouped together in the following sequence: Feature, Projects, Regulars, Readers please note: Skills and Projects, Technical, Technique, Test, Test Report, Tool Talk Feature - Pages 1 - 32 Projects - Pages 32 - 56 Regulars - Pages 56 - 57 Skills and Projects - Pages 57 - 70 Technical - Pages 70 - 84 Technique - Pages 84 - 91 Test - Pages 91 - 97 Test Report - Pages 97 - 101 Tool Talk - Pages 101 - 103 1 36 Feature A review of the AWGB's Hay on Wye exhibition in 1990 Bert Marsh 1 38 Feature A light hearted look at the equipment required for turning Frank Sharman 1 28 Feature A review of Raffan's work in 1990 In house 1 30 Feature Making a reasonable living from woodturning Reg Sherwin 1 19 Feature Making bowls from Norfolk Pine with a fine lustre Ron Kent 1 4 Feature Large laminated turned and carved work Ted Hunter 2 59 Feature The first Swedish woodturning seminar Anders Mattsson 2 49 Feature A report on the AAW 4th annual symposium, Gatlinburg, 1990 Dick Gerard 2 40 Feature A review of the work of Stephen Hogbin In house 2 52 Feature A review of the Craft Supplies seminar at Buxton John Haywood 2 2 31 Feature A review of the Irish Woodturners' Seminar, Sligo, 1990 Merryll Saylan 2 24 Feature A review of the Rufford Centre woodturning exhibition Ray Key 2 19 Feature A report of the 1990 instructors' conference in Caithness Reg Sherwin 2 60 Feature Melbourne Wood Show, Melbourne October 1990 Tom Darby 3 58
    [Show full text]
  • 1981-04-15 EA Plan of Development Production
    United States Department of the Interior Office of the Secretary Minerals Management Service 1340 West Sixth Street Los Angeles, California 90017 OCS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT July 8, 1982 Operator Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Plan Type Development/Production Lease OCS-P 0296 Block 34 N., 37 W. Pl atfonn Edith Date Submitted April 15, 1981 Prepared by the Office of the Deputy Minerals Manager, Field Operations, Pacific OCS Region Related Environmental Documents U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Environmental Impact Report - Environmental Assessment, Shell OCS Beta Unit Development (prepared jointly with agencies of the State of California, 1978) 3 Volumes Environmental Assessment, Exploration, for Lease OCS-P 0296 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Proposed 1975 OCS Oil and Gas General Lease Sale Offshore Southern California (OCS Sale No. 35), 5 Volumes Proposed 1979 OCS Oil and Gas Lease Sale Offshore Southern California (OCS Sale No. 48), 5 Volumes Proposed 1982 OCS Oil and Gas General Lease Sale Offshore Southern California (OCS Sale No. 68), 2 Volumes u.c. Santa Cruz - BLM, Study of Marine Mammals and Seabirds of the Southern California Bight ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. OPERATOR PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT/PRODUCTION, PROPOSED PLATFORM EDITH, LEASE OCS-P 0296, BETA AREA, SAN PEDRO BAY, OFFSHORE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Table of Contents Page I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ••••••••••••••••••••• 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT •••••••••••••••••••• 12 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 29 IV. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION •••••••••••••••••••• 46 v. UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS •••••••••••••• 48 VI. CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 48 VII. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONS!) ••••••••••••••• 51 VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DETERMINATION ••••••••••••••••• 55 IX.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Concerns of Heavy Metals (Pb; Cd; Hg) and Metalloids (As)
    Health concerns of the heavy metals and metalloids Chris Cooksey • Toxicity - acute and chronic • Arsenic • Mercury • Lead • Cadmium Toxicity - acute and chronic Acute - LD50 Trevan, J. W., 'The error of determination of toxicity', Proc. Royal Soc., 1927, 101B, 483-514 LD50 (rat, oral) mg/kg CdS 7080 NaCl 3000 As 763 HgCl 210 NaF 52 Tl2SO4 16 NaCN 6.4 HgCl2 1 Hodge and Sterner Scale (1943) Toxicity Commonly used term LD50 (rat, oral) Rating 1 Extremely Toxic <=1 2 Highly Toxic 1 - 50 3 Moderately Toxic 50 - 500 4 Slightly Toxic 500 - 5000 5 Practically Non-toxic 5000 - 15000 6 Relatively Harmless >15000 GHS - CLP LD50 Category <=5 1 Danger 5 - 50 2 Danger 50 - 300 3 Danger 300 - 2000 4 Warning Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling and Packaging of Chemicals CLP-Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 Toxicity - acute and chronic Chronic The long-term effect of sub-lethal exposure • Toxicity - acute and chronic • Arsenic • Mercury • Lead • Cadmium Arsenic • Pesticide o Inheritance powder • Taxidermy • Herbicide o Agent Blue • Pigments • Therapeutic uses Inorganic arsenic poisoning kills by allosteric inhibition of essential metabolic enzymes, leading to death from multi- system organ failure. Arsenicosis - chronic arsenic poisoning. Arsenic LD50 rat oral mg/kg 10000 1000 LD50 100 10 1 Arsine Arsenic acid Trimethylarsine Emerald green ArsenicArsenious trisulfide oxideSodium arsenite MethanearsonicDimethylarsinic acid acid Arsenic poisoning by volatile arsenic compounds from mouldy wall paper in damp rooms • Gmelin (1839) toxic mould gas • Selmi (1874) AsH3 • Basedow (1846) cacodyl oxide • Gosio (1893) alkyl arsine • Biginelli (1893) Et2AsH • Klason (1914) Et2AsO • Challenger (1933) Me3As • McBride & Wolfe (1971) Me2AsH or is it really true ? William R.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Group
    Historical Group NEWSLETTER and SUMMARY OF PAPERS No. 61 Winter 2012 Registered Charity No. 207890 COMMITTEE Chairman: Prof A T Dronsfield, School of Education, | Prof J Betteridge (Twickenham, Middlesex) Health and Sciences, University of Derby, | Dr N G Coley (Open University) Derby, DE22 1GB [e-mail [email protected]] | Dr C J Cooksey (Watford, Hertfordshire) Secretary: | Prof E Homburg (University of Maastricht) Prof W P Griffith, Department of Chemistry, | Prof F James (Royal Institution) Imperial College, South Kensington, London, | Dr D Leaback (Biolink Technology) SW7 2AZ [e-mail [email protected]] | Dr P J T Morris (Science Museum) Treasurer; Membership Secretary: | Prof. J. W. Nicholson (University of Greenwich) Dr J A Hudson, Graythwaite, Loweswater, | Mr P N Reed (Steensbridge, Herefordshire) Cockermouth, Cumbria, CA13 0SU | Dr V Quirke (Oxford Brookes University) [e-mail [email protected]] | Dr S Robinson (Ham, Surrey) Newsletter Editor: | Prof. H. Rzepa (Imperial College) Dr A Simmons, Epsom Lodge, | Dr. A Sella (University College) La Grande Route de St Jean,St John, Jersey, JE3 4FL [e-mail [email protected]] Newsletter Production: Dr G P Moss, School of Biological and Chemical, Sciences Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS [e-mail [email protected]] http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/rschg/ http://www.rsc.org/membership/networking/interestgroups/historical/index.asp Contents From the Editor 2 RSC Historical Group News - Bill Griffith 3 Identification Query - W. H. Brock 4 Members’ Publications 5 NEWS AND UPDATES 6 USEFUL WEBSITES AND ADDRESSES 7 SHORT ESSAYS 9 The Copperas Works at Tankerton - Chris Cooksey 9 Mauveine - the final word? (3) - Chris Cooksey and H.
    [Show full text]
  • Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    ANNUAL 2017 REPORT Financial Highlights (Millions of dollars and shares, except per share data) 20171 20161 20151 Revenue Dividends to in billions Shareholders Revenue $ 20,620 $ 15,887 $ 23,633 in millions Operating Income (Loss) $ 1,362 $ (6,778) $ (165) Amounts Attributable to Company Shareholders: Loss from Continuing Operations $ (444) $ (5,761) $ (666) $614 $626 $620 $15.9 Net Loss $ (463) $ (5,763) $ (671) $20.6 $23.6 Diluted Income per Share Attributable to Company Shareholders: Loss from Continuing Operations $ (0.51) $ (6.69) $ (0.78) Net Loss $ (0.53) $ (6.69) $ (0.79) Cash Dividends per Share $ 0.72 $ 0.72 $ 0.72 Diluted Common Shares Outstanding 870 861 853 Working Capital2 $ 5,915 $ 7,654 $ 14,733 Capital Expenditures $ 1,373 $ 798 $ 2,184 Total Debt $ 10,942 $ 12,384 $ 15,355 17 16 15 17 16 15 Debt to Total Capitalization3 57% 57% 50% Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization $ 1,556 $ 1,503 $ 1,835 4 Total Capitalization $ 19,291 $ 21,832 $ 30,850 Capital Expenditures in billions 1 Reported results during these periods include impairments and other charges of $647 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, merger-related costs and termination fee of $4.1 billion and impairments and other charges of $3.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016, and impairments and other charges of $2.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015. 2 Working Capital is defined as total current assets less total current liabilities. $1.4 $0.8 $2.2 3 Debt to Total Capitalization is defined as total debt divided by the sum of total debt plus total shareholders’ equity.
    [Show full text]
  • JX Report for a Sustainable Future 2010 JX Report for a Sustainable Future 2010 the JX Group Was Formed in April 2010 in Quest of a Sustainable Future
    2010 Report for a Sustainable Future JX JX Holdings, Inc. JX Report for a Sustainable Future 2010 The JX Group was formed in April 2010 in quest of a sustainable future. Under our new mission statement, the JX Group aims to make major advances in the fields of energy, resources and materials. Guided by the slogan of “The Future of Energy, Resources and Materials,” the JX Group is determined to shape the future. JX Group Mission Statement JX Group Slogan JX Group Mission Statement JX Group will contribute to the development of a sustainable economy and society through innovation in the areas of energy, resources and materials. JX Group Values Our actions will respect the EARTH. Ethics Advanced ideas Relationship with society Trustworthy products/services Harmony with the environment About JX The name “JX” symbolizes the JX Group’s mission statement. The letter “J” represents our position as one of the world’s largest integrated energy, resources and materials business groups from Japan, while the letter “X” represents our willingness to pioneer new frontiers, our future growth and development potential and innovation. About the JX Corporate Brand Mark The JX corporate brand mark symbolizes the continuity of the global environment and the JX Group based on the JX Group’s mission statement. The design, in which the “JX” logo overlaps with a sphere, represents the JX Group’s commitment to a green earth—i.e., our contribution to the development of a sustainable economy and society, through innovation in the areas of energy, resources and materials. * The JX corporate brand mark is common to JX Holdings, Inc., JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation, JX Nippon Oil & Gas Exploration Corporation and JX Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Refugio Oil Spill Response & Recovery
    Refugio Oil Spill Response & Recovery Incident Summary • On 19 May 2015 at 1243, report to the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services • The report indicated a pipeline rupture had occurred near Refugio State Beach in Santa Barbara County, CA • The responsible party (Plains All American Pipeline) estimated the total release at 500 barrels (21,000 gallons) of crude oil on the shoreside of Hwy 101 which then flowed into the Pacific Ocean • 23x7 mile (138 square mile) fishery closure Incident Summary (con’t) • Initial reports estimated a sheen to be 3.5 NM along the beach and 50-100 yards into the water • Revised worst-case release: 101,000 gal (2,400 bbl) • On May 19, Governor Brown declared a State of Emergency for Santa Barbara County • On June 5, Governor Brown issued a subsequent Executive Order to Further Expedite Oil Spill Recovery Efforts in Santa Barbara County Location of Incident (Approximately 25 miles west of Santa Barbara) Incident Command Post Shoreline below the cliff Photo Courtesy of CDFW‐OSPR Refugio State Beach Photo Courtesy of NOAA Significant Environmental, Cultural, Historical & Social Concerns • 2 Marine Protected Areas (Kashtayit & Naples) • 23‐mile by 7‐mile mile fishery closure • Wildlife impacts – birds, mammals, Grunion Spawning • Chumash Indian Tribe – 2,000 ‐ 5,000 members coastal members – Inhabitants of SB Coast for over 13,000 years • Varied Beach composition & environments: – Cobble, Rock, Sand, Cliffs, Kelp, Marinas, Parks Areas of Special Interest/Concerns Volunteers Extensive Fisheries Closure Zone Cultural and Tribal Integration Wildlife Operation - marine mammals NGO and community involvement At Maximum Effort • Personnel – 1287 in field – 129 in ICP • Vessels on water – 21 skimmers – 2 support barges • 6,000 ft boom deployed • 5 SCAT teams deployed • 23 x 7 mile fishery closure • 1000‐ft temporary flight restriction within a 5‐mile radius of Refugio Beach – Daily responder overflights Unified Command Established USCG Sector LA‐LB Sector Commander, EPA Region 9, CA DFW, Santa Barbara Co OEM, Plains All American.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Pandemic Defeated America Spread
    neutered the nation’s ability to prevent the pathogen’s How the Pandemic Defeated America spread. A bloated, inefficient health-care system left hospitals ill-prepared for the ensuing wave of By Ed Yong sickness. Racist policies that have endured since the Updated at 1:12 p.m. ET on August 4, 2020. days of colonization and slavery left Indigenous and Black Americans especially vulnerable to COVID-19. {photo} The decades-long process of shredding the nation’s Caption: Image above: A masked worker cleans a social safety net forced millions of essential workers New York City subway entrance. in low-paying jobs to risk their life for their livelihood. The same social-media platforms that How did it come to this? A virus a thousand sowed partisanship and misinformation during the times smaller than a dust mote has humbled and 2014 Ebola outbreak in Africa and the 2016 U.S. humiliated the planet’s most powerful nation. America election became vectors for conspiracy theories during has failed to protect its people, leaving them with the 2020 pandemic. illness and financial ruin. It has lost its status as a The U.S. has little excuse for its inattention. In global leader. It has careened between inaction and recent decades, epidemics of SARS, MERS, Ebola, ineptitude. The breadth and magnitude of its errors are H1N1 flu, Zika, and monkeypox showed the havoc difficult, in the moment, to truly fathom. that new and re-emergent pathogens could wreak. In the first half of 2020, SARS-CoV-2—the Health experts, business leaders, and even middle new coronavirus behind the disease COVID-19— schoolers ran simulated exercises to game out the infected 10 million people around the world and killed spread of new diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE January 27-28, 2019
    ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE January 27-28, 2019 COMMUNITY COLLEGE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA We get the big picture. A Proven Leader in the Representation of California’s Community Colleges www.aalrr.com Cerritos | Fresno | Irvine | Marin | Pasadena Pleasanton | Riverside | Sacramento | San Diego TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE 2019 LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE HOTEL MAP ............................................................................................ 4 SCHEDULE-AT-A-GLANCE .................................................................... 6 PROGRAM SCHEDULE .......................................................................... 9 Sunday, January 27 .................................................................................... 9 Monday, January 28 .................................................................................. 18 PRESENTER INFORMATION ............................................................... 22 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATION ....................................... 28 LEAGUE STAFF .................................................................................... 29 CALENDAR OF EVENTS ...................................................................... 30 LEAGUE CORPORATE PARTNERS AND CONFERENCE SPONSORS ................................................................. 31 CONFERENCE EVALUATION .............................................................. 37 EXCELLENCE IN TRUSTEESHIP TRACKING FORM ......................... 39 NOTES ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]