DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 68 / Monday, April 8, 1996 / Proposed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 68 / Monday, April 8, 1996 / Proposed 15446 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 68 / Monday, April 8, 1996 / Proposed Rules meanings unless otherwise defined in Nodak Mutual Insurance Company (North beginning of this notice and be paragraph (b) of this section. Dakota) 1 submitted to: Docket Section, Room Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Group * * * * * 5109, NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street, SW., (Arkansas, Mississippi) Washington, DC 20590. It is requested 4. Paragraph (a) of § 544.5 would be Tennessee Farmers Companies (Tennessee) that 10 copies of the comments be revised to read as follows: 7. Appendix C to Part 544 would be revised to read as follows: provided. The Docket Section is open 544.5 General requirements for reports. on weekdays from 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. Appendix CÐMotor Vehicle Rental and * * * * * FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Leasing Companies (Including technical issues: Mr. Richard Van (a) Each insurer to which this part Licensees and Franchisees) Subject to Iderstine, Office of Vehicle Safety applies shall submit a report annually the Reporting Requirements of Part 544 Standards, NPS±21, telephone (202) not later than October 25, beginning on Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. 366±5280, FAX (202) 366±4329. October 25, 1986. This report shall Avis, Inc. For legal issues: Ms. Dorothy Nakama, contain the information required by Office of Chief Counsel, NCC±20, § 544.6 of this part for the calendar year Budget Rent-A-Car Corporation 1 telephone (202) 366±2992, FAX (202) three years previous to the year in Citicorp Bankers Leasing Corporation Dollar Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. 366±3820. Both may be reached at the which the report is filed (e.g., the report Donlen Corporation 1 National Highway Traffic Safety due by October 25, 1996 shall contain Hertz Rent-A-Car Division (subsidiary of Administration, 400 Seventh Street, the required information for the 1993 Hertz Corporation) SW., Washington, DC 20590. Comments Lease Plan International 1 calendar year). should not be sent or faxed to these * * * * * National Car Rental System, Inc. Penske Truck Leasing Company persons, but should be sent to the 5. Appendix A to Part 544 would be Ryder System, Inc. (Both rental and leasing Docket Section. operations) revised to read as follows: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: U-Haul International, Inc. (Subsidiary of Appendix AÐInsurers of Motor Vehicle AMERCO) President's Regulatory Reinvention Insurance Policies Subject to the USL Capital Fleet Services 1 Initiative Reporting Requirements in Each State Issued on: April 1, 1996. in Which They Do Business Pursuant to the March 4, 1995 Barry Felrice, directive ``Regulatory Reinvention Aetna Life & Casualty Group Associate Administrator for Safety Initiative'' from the President to the Allmerica Property & Casualty Companies1 Performance Standards. heads of departments and agencies, Allstate Insurance Group [FR Doc. 96±8357 Filed 4±5±96; 8:45 am] NHTSA undertook a review of its American Family Group BILLING CODE 4910±59±P regulations and directives. During the American International Group California State Auto Association course of this review, NHTSA identified regulations that it could propose to CNA Insurance Companies 49 CFR Part 571 Farmers Insurance Group eliminate as unnecessary or to amend to Geico Corporation Group [Docket No. 96±30; Notice 1] improve their comprehensibility, application, or appropriateness. Among ITT Hartford Insurance Group RIN 2127±AF88 Liberty Mutual Group these regulations is Federal Motor Metropolitan Group1 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Vehicle Safety Standard No. 104, Nationwide Group Standards; Windshield Wiping and Windshield wiping and washing systems Progressive Group Washing Systems (49 CFR § 571.104). Based on its review Prudential of America Group of the standard, NHTSA is proposing Safeco Insurance Companies AGENCY: National Highway Traffic three alternative approaches to State Farm Group Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. amending Standard No. 104. Travelers Insurance Group ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. USAA Group Background of Standard No. 104 SUMMARY: In this document, NHTSA Standard No. 104 was issued in 1967 6. Appendix B to Part 544 would be proposes changes to the Federal Motor revised to read as follows: (32 FR 2408) as one of the initial Federal Vehicle Safety Standard on windshield Motor Vehicle Safety Standards Appendix BÐIssuers of Motor Vehicle wiping and washing systems. The (FMVSSs). At present, the standard Insurance Policies Subject to the proposals range from applying applies to passenger cars, multipurpose Reporting Requirements Only in performance requirements to the passenger vehicles (MPVs), trucks, and Designated States systems in light trucks and buses. Standard No. 104 specifies that multipurpose passenger vehicles to Alfa Insurance Group (Alabama) each vehicle shall have a power-driven Amica Mutual Insurance Company (Rhode rescinding the Standard. This proposed windshield wiping system that meets Island) action is part of NHTSA's efforts to S4.1.1's requirement that each system Arbella Mutual Insurance (Massachusetts) implement the President's Regulatory shall have at least two speeds, each of Auto Club of Michigan (Michigan) Reinvention Initiative. which wipes at a different number of Commerce Group, Inc. (Massachusetts) DATES: Comments must be received on cycles per minute. Commercial Union Insurance Companies or before May 23, 1996. Standard No. 104 specifies additional (Maine) ADDRESSES: Comments must refer to the wiping requirements for passenger cars, Concord Group Insurance Companies docket and notice numbers cited at the but not for the other vehicle types (Vermont) Erie Insurance Group (Pennsylvania) subject to the standard. The passenger 1 Kentucky Farm Bureau Group (Kentucky) Indicates a newly listed company which must car windshield areas to be wiped are file a report beginning with the report due October specified in paragraphs S4.1.2 and 25, 1996 1 Indicates a newly listed company which must 1 Indicates a newly listed company which must S4.1.2.1 of the standard. S4.1.2 specifies file a report beginning with the report due October file a report beginning with the report due October three areas for passenger car 25, 1996 25, 1996 windshields, designated as areas ``A'', Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 68 / Monday, April 8, 1996 / Proposed Rules 15447 ``B'', and ``C.'' A specified percentage of 1. Proposal OneÐRescind Standard No. State regulations, even ones differing the glazing in each area is required to be 104 from those of another State, on this wiped, as shown in Figures 1 and 2 of NHTSA's first alternative proposal is subject would conflict with Federal law SAE Recommended Practice J903a, May to rescind Standard No. 104. To adopt or have a deleterious effect on motor 1966, which the standard incorporates this proposal, NHTSA would conclude vehicle safety. by reference. The location of those areas that even if Standard No. 104 should be Finally, the agency notes that is determined using the angles specified rescinded, manufacturers would rescinding Standard No. 104 would also in Tables I, II, III, and IV of Standard No. continue to provide means to wipe and remove what may be unnecessarily 104, as applicable. Those tables apply to wash motor vehicle windshields. It is restrictive specifications for windshield passenger cars of varying overall widths, widely recognized that a motor vehicle wiping and washing systems. For namely, from less than 60 inches to must have some means for keeping the example, at present, S4.1 specifies that more than 68 inches. The angles set windshield wiped and washed so that a windshield wiping system must have forth in the tables vary according to the the driver can view the road ahead. at least two frequencies, one of which is at least 45 cycles per minute, and the overall width of the vehicle. Finally, More important, the fact that light other cycle must differ by at least 15 paragraph S4.1.2 provides that all of the trucks and MPVs apparently provide cycles per minute. Manufacturers might glazing counted toward meeting the wiping and washing performance comparable to that in passenger cars, develop means to clean windshields percentage of each area required to be that do not operate in cycles, or other wiped must lie within the area bounded despite the absence of performance requirements for light trucks and MPVs, means that do not involve the by a perimeter line on the glazing traditional two wiper blades rotating in surface one inch from the edge of the indicates that passenger cars would continue to provide that level of synchronization. daylight opening. performance in the absence of 2. Proposal TwoÐUpgrading the MPV Standard No. 104 also specifies performance requirements. and Light Truck Requirements to Make requirements for windshield washing In addition, market forces (in the form Them Equivalent to the Passenger Car systems on passenger cars, MPVs, of customer demand) would be highly Requirement trucks, and buses. Each of those vehicles likely to ensure that vehicle is required in S4.2.1 or S4.2.2 to have manufacturers continue to provide In the last decade, sales of light trucks a windshield washing system that meets windshield wiping and washing and multipurpose passenger vehicles the requirements of SAE Recommended systems in motor vehicles. Customer (MPVs) have increased substantially. In Practice J942 (SAE J942), ``Passenger Car magazines and consumers themselves addition, these vehicles have been Windshield Washing Systems,'' would be likely to react negatively to increasingly used to transport November 1965, with a few vehicles that do not have adequate passengers. As a result, the number of modifications. windshield wiping and washing deaths and injuries associated with systems. The agency notes that more those vehicles have substantially NHTSA's Review of Standard No. 104 than 93 percent of all cars and light increased. and Proposals for Change trucks have intermittent (i.e., variable In response, NHTSA has amended speed) wipers even though only two certain FMVSSs to ensure that In reviewing Standard No. 104 under wiper speeds are required by Standard passengers are afforded the same level the President's Regulatory Reinvention No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Issue 36C Remarketing Memorandum
    SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SECOND SERIES VARIABLE RATE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS ISSUE 36C Remarketing Memorandum Airport Commission of the City and County of San Francisco San Francisco International Airport Second Series Variable Rate Revenue Refunding Bonds Issue 36C REMARKETING—NOT A NEW ISSUE—BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Moody’s: Aa1/VMIG1 S&P: AAA/A-1 Fitch: AA/F1 (See “RATINGS” herein) On June 3, 2009, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP and Quateman LLP, Prior Co-Bond Counsel to the Commission, rendered their respective opinions to the effect that, based upon an analysis of then-existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions, and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Issue 36C Bonds was excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), except that no opinion was expressed as to the status of interest on any Issue 36C Bond for any period that such Issue 36C Bond was held by a “substantial user” of the facilities financed or refinanced by the Issue 36C Bonds or by a “related person” within the meaning of Section 147(a) of the Code. Prior Co-Bond Counsel further opined that interest on the Issue 36C Bonds was not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal individual or corporate alternative minimum taxes nor was it included in adjusted current earnings when calculating corporate alternative minimum taxable income. Prior Co-Bond Counsel also opined that interest on the Issue 36C Bonds was exempt from State of California personal income taxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Rent-A-Car and Europcar Expand Strategic Alliance to Create the World’S Largest Car Rental Network
    For more information, contact: Ned Maniscalco, Enterprise Rent-A-Car 314-512-5523, [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Enterprise Rent-A-Car and Europcar Expand Strategic Alliance To Create the World’s Largest Car Rental Network Partnership Expands Transatlantic Alliance Established in 2006 Between Europcar and National Car Rental and Alamo Rent A Car September 4, 2008 (St. Louis, Missouri) – Enterprise Rent-A-Car, North America’s largest car rental company, and Europcar, the number one car rental company in Europe, today announced they have enhanced their strategic alliance to include the Enterprise brand in North America, as well as the National Car Rental and Alamo Rent A Car brands that previously constituted the transatlantic partnership. Enterprise and Europcar have been working to formally expand the alliance ever since Enterprise’s purchase of the National and Alamo brands in North America in August 2007. With the addition to the new partnership of the Enterprise brand in North America, the alliance now offers a combined fleet of more than 1.2 million rental vehicles in more than 13,000 locations in 162 countries. The newly expanded partnership constitutes the largest car rental network in the world. The expanded alliance provides rental car coverage for customers traveling between each partner company’s areas of operations. Under the terms of the agreement, the partners will also take a coordinated approach to global corporate accounts, offering today’s companies and organizations the most extensive service provider network in the rental car industry anywhere in the world, complete with coordinated loyalty programs. The alliance is designed to leverage and develop traffic between North America and Europe: each year an estimated 12 million people travel across the Atlantic in either direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Aktueller Stand Des Car-Sharing in Europa
    more options for energy efficient mobility through Car-Sharing Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 Juni 2010 Bundesverband CarSharing e. V. Willi Loose momo Car-Sharing More options for energy efficient mobility through Car-Sharing Grant agreement No.: IEE/07/696/SI2.499387 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 I Inhaltsverzeichnis 0. Zusammenfassung 1 1. Einleitung und Übersicht 7 1.1 Das Projekt momo Car-Sharing 7 1.2 Inhalt des Berichts 9 2. Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa 11 2.1 Überblick 11 2.2 Stand des Car-Sharing in europäischen Ländern 13 2.2.1 Belgien 13 2.2.2 Dänemark 14 2.2.3 Deutschland 14 2.2.4 Finnland 15 2.2.5 Frankreich 16 2.2.6 Großbritannien 16 2.2.7 Irland 17 2.2.8 Italien 18 2.2.9 Niederlande 19 2.2.10 Österreich 19 2.2.11 Portugal 19 2.2.12 Schweden 20 2.2.13 Schweiz 20 2.2.14 Spanien 21 2.3 Vergleichende Einschätzung des Car-Sharing-Wachstums 21 3. Befragung der europäischen Car-Sharing-Anbieter 24 3.1 Methodik der Befragung 24 3.2 Rücklauf der Fragebögen 25 3.3 Ausgewählte Befragungsergebnisse 27 3.3.1 Erhebungsergebnisse zur Car-Sharing-Nutzung 27 3.3.2 Erhebungsergebnisse zu Kooperationen der Car-Sharing-Anbieter 39 3.3.3 Erhebungsergebnisse zur politischen Unterstützung 50 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 II 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    2018 ANNUAL REPORT The New NY Bridge Project serve customers in a growth environment. We Letter to our increased rental revenue across all our regions and verticals, and we continued to foster organic growth through cross-selling. This was aided by Stockholders the expansion of our specialty segment to 323 Our record performance in 2018 underscored locations. our ability to capitalize on demand through a combination of scale, technology and other Furthermore, while the U.S. equipment rental sustainable competitive advantages. This is industry grew by a solid 8% in 2018, we grew how we best serve our customers and create faster. Our rental revenue, pro-forma for 2017 value for our investors. acquisitions, increased 10.5% year-over-year. Growth is synergistic for us: it creates the We entered 2018 from a position of strength, with potential for greater efficiency and generates a large and diversified presence in North America. cash that we use to advance our strategy. During the year, we acquired BakerCorp, a fluid solutions specialist business, and BlueLine, a In 2018, in addition to allocating capital for national construction equipment rental company, M&A, rental fleet, technology and productivity as well as several smaller operations. These initiatives, we embarked on a $1.25 billion share transactions helped us reach a new milestone of repurchase program to provide further value for over $8 billion in annual revenue. our stockholders. We intend to complete the program in 2019. For the full year 2018, United Rentals delivered GAAP earnings per diluted share of $13.12, Value through Productivity compared with $15.73 for the full year 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Rental Security Contacts
    Car Rental Security Contacts www.carrentalsecurity.com This list is divided into three sections. The first is the Corporate Headquarters (HQ) information for each agency. In some cases there may also be listed a “Car Control” function normally responsible for overdue vehicles, vehicle impounds/towing, etc. Some may list toll-free after-hours numbers and/or Customer Service / Roadside Assistance numbers. After-hours information may be limited depending upon the agency. Vehicle registration information is also listed where provided. Keep in mind that most agencies have “floating” or “controlled” fleets so vehicles with out of state plates may have been rented locally. The second part of the list is a summary state-by-state listing of those security contacts located in the field. The last listing is a detailed list of all security contacts (HQ and Field) by rental agency name and then in alphabetical order. See www.carrentalsecurity.com for the most current list. Please note the footnote disclaimer. Current as of 03/25/2008 HQ SECURITY CONTACTS ADVANTAGE ALAMO AVIS AVIS BUDGET GROUP BUDGET CCRG CENDANT DOLLAR DTG/DTAG ENTERPRISE HERTZ NATIONAL PV HOLDING RENTAL CAR FINANCE VANGUARD FIELD SECURITY CONTACTS – by State AK AL AR AZ CA CO CT DC DE FL GA HI IA ID IL IN KS KY LA MA MD ME MI MN MO MS MT NC ND NE NH NJ NM NV NY OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VA VT WA WI WV WY ALL SECURITY CONTACTS – by Company ADVANTAGE ALAMO AVIS AVIS BUDGET GROUP BUDGET CCRG CENDANT DOLLAR DTG/DTAG ENTERPRISE HERTZ NATIONAL PV HOLDING RENTAL CAR FINANCE VANGUARD DISCLAIMER – This list is for the exclusive use of Car Rental Security, Law Enforcement, Bank Card Security and other Security related groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew C. Taylor Executive Chairman Enterprise Holdings Inc
    Andrew C. Taylor Executive Chairman Enterprise Holdings Inc. Andrew Taylor, who became involved in the automotive business more than 50 years ago, currently serves as Executive Chairman of Enterprise Holdings Inc., the privately held business founded in 1957 by his father, Jack Taylor. Enterprise Holdings operates – through an integrated global network of independent regional subsidiaries and franchises – the Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Alamo Rent A Car and National Car Rental brands, as well as more than 10,000 fully staffed neighborhood and airport locations in 100 countries and territories. Enterprise Holdings is the largest car rental company in the world, as measured by revenue and fleet. In addition, Enterprise Holdings is the most comprehensive service provider and only investment-grade company in the U.S. car rental industry. The company and its affiliate Enterprise Fleet Management together offer a total transportation solution, operating more than 2 million vehicles throughout the world. Combined, these businesses – accounting for $25.9 billion in revenue in fiscal year 2019 – include the Car Sales, Truck Rental, CarShare, Commute vanpooling, Zimride, Exotic Car Collection, Subscribe with Enterprise, Car Club (U.K.) and Flex-E-Rent (U.K.) services, all marketed under the Enterprise brand name. The annual revenues of Enterprise Holdings – one of America’s largest private companies – and Enterprise Fleet Management rank near the top of the global travel industry, exceeding many airlines and most cruise lines, hotels, tour operators, and online travel agencies. Taylor joined Enterprise at the age of 16 in one of the original St. Louis offices. He began his career by washing cars during summer and holiday vacations and learning the business from the ground up.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Dollar Rental Car Require Gas Receipts
    Does Dollar Rental Car Require Gas Receipts Unfaulty and rushiest Sloan circumnavigated some loup so narratively! Paul still inflaming slenderly while buskined Jordy offers that beekeeper. Lacklustre Osborne brook that pampas preplanning triumphantly and gnawn endemically. The election of any SLP coverage offered by Alamo might duplicate, void or cause your own policies to become excess coverage. Within State Sales Tax Base? The Tolls Will be Included in Your Bill. The percentage would be equal to the percentage of your home that you use for business purposes. In rental periods of rental receipts? Exceptions apply for any claims involving government entities. These are general rental requirements of Dollar Rent a Car. So I was able to make it across PR on my own with a tiny fold out map I got from a travel book from my local library. But Auto Europe and Hertz probably do, too. They offer car off fluids in car rental receipts; may be available in the insurance! Called them and did no good at all. We have deep values upon which our brand has been built and truly do not tolerate impropriety or unfair practices from our locations or representatives. Car rental companies are required by law to pay monthly assessments to the California Travel and Tourism Commission on revenue generated at either airport or hotel rental locations. All accidental injuries during which is a small business use a hard disk drive period, such a florist closer look at dlg lawyer, does dollar rental car require gas receipts is resulting from participating companies mentioned herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Charging: Charging up University Campuses
    Workplace Charging: Charging Up University Campuses Carrie Giles, ICF International Carrie Ryder, ICF International Stephen Lommele, National Renewable Energy Laboratory March 2016 DRAFT REPORT Workplace Workplace Charging: Charging Up University Campuses As leading regional employers, colleges and universities are on the front line of local- and national-level technology trends. To remain competitive, many schools are offering plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) charging to their faculty, staff, and students. While the installation and management of PEV charging stations requires planning, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Workplace Charging Challenge, launched in 2013, aims to support these charging efforts. This document highlights the experiences of university partners in the Top 5 Reasons for Campus Charging: Workplace Charging Challenge (Challenge) that demonstrate the many benefits charging - Reduce commuter emissions provides to higher education institutions. PEV - Offer research opportunities charging stations, known as electric vehicle - Provide employee and student benefits supply equipment (EVSE), provide a service to - Enable fleet charging employees and students, signal environmental - Signal environmental leadership. leadership, deliver educational and research opportunities, and play an important role in achieving greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction goals. Clean Commute Workplace charging at universities is an effective way to reduce a school’s Scope 31 emissions, which include emissions generated through employee commuting. Many universities have pledged to reduce GHG emissions either individually or through national pledges, such as the American College and University Presidents’ Climate Commitment (ACUPCC). PEV charging stations are effective tools to help achieve these goals. Reducing commuter emissions through workplace charging is particularly important on suburban, rural, and remote campuses with limited public transportation options.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquiring Zipcar: Brand Building in the Share Economy
    Boston University School of Management BU Case Study 12-010 Rev. December 12, 2012 Acquiring Zipcar Brand Building in the Share Economy By Susan Fournier, Giana Eckhardt and Fleura Bardhi Scott Griffith, CEO of Zipcar, languished over his stock charts. They had something here, everyone agreed about that. Zipcar had shaken up the car rental industry with a “new model” for people who wanted steady access to cars without the hassle of owning them. Sales had been phenomenal. Since its beginning in 2000, Zipcar had experienced 100%+ growth annually, with annual revenue in the previous year of $241.6 million. Zipcar now boasted more than 750,000 members and over 8,900 cars in urban areas and college campuses throughout the United States, Canada and the U.K. and claimed nearly half of all global car-sharing members. The company had continued international expansion by purchasing the largest car sharing company in Spain. The buzz had been wonderful. Still, Zipcar’s stock price was being beaten down, falling from a high of $31.50 to a current trade at $8 and change (See Exhibit 1). The company had failed to turn an annual profit since its founding in 2000 and held but two months’ of operating cash on hand as of September 2012. Critics wondered about the sustainability of the business model in the face of increased competition. There was no doubt: the “big guys” were circling. Enterprise Rent-a-Car Co. had entered car sharing with a model of its own (See Exhibit 2). The Enterprise network, which included almost 1 million vehicles and more than 5,500 offices located within 15 miles of 90 percent of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement+Agreement+Avis.Pdf
    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. In re: Investigative Subpoena Duces Tecum issued by the Florida Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, Consumer CASE NO. 2017 CA 000122 Protection Division, to AvisBudget Group, Inc. and Payless Car Rental System, Inc. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ("Settlement Agreement") is entered into by and between the Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs ("Attorney General"), on one hand, and Avis Budget Car Rental System, LLC, and Payless Car Rental, Inc., (collectively "ABCR"),1 on the other, and is effective as of the date of the last signature on the Settlement Agreement. RECITALS 1. Whereas, ABCR, through its subsidiary entities, is engaged in the car rental business throughout the State of Florida; 2. Whereas, there are toll roads, including many that are cashless, established and operated by the State of Florida or various political subdivisions of the State. On cashless toll roads, drivers are unable to pay for tolls with cash and are billed Avis Budget Car Rental System, LLC, and Payless Car Rental, Inc., are subsidiaries of AvisBudget Group, Inc., the petitioner in this action. The terms of this Settlement Agreement do not apply to: (a) Budget Truck rentals; (b) Zipcar rentals; or (c) rentals made by independently owned and operated Avis, Budget, or Payless licensees. EXHIBIT A for use of the toll road by either a transponder systemor a plate recognition system; 3. Whereas, all major car rental companies operating in Florida charge foruse of an electronic toll payment service.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Our Stockholders
    In 2020, we achieved a net income margin Letter to our of 10.4% and an adjusted EBITDA margin1 of 46.1% — within 220 and 50 basis points Stockholders of 2019, respectively, despite significantly lower demand. We also generated net cash provided by operating activities of We executed well in a difficult year, drawing $2.7 billion and record free cash flow1 of on the disciplines we’ve engineered into $2.4 billion, contributing to the $3.1 billion of our business for more than a decade. Most total liquidity we had at year-end. importantly, we delivered on our promises. These results reflect the considerable economic Nothing about 2020 was business as usual. The constraints of the pandemic, mitigated by the year began on a positive note that dissipated resilience of our business model. Beyond that, as the pandemic took root. We moved quickly our performance reflects the fierce determination to establish the priorities that would guide us of our team, strong capital management and in the coming months: protect our employees, rigorous cost discipline. provide continuity of service for our customers, maintain our service capacity and safeguard the A purposeful response interests of our investors. We’re proud that United To manage effectively through the pandemic, we Rentals met all of these objectives, while providing took a balanced short-term and long-term view. essential services to our communities. Each time we committed to a course of action, we considered all of the implications of that The trough for equipment rental came in April, decision. For instance, with capital expenditures, and demand stayed at low ebb for several weeks we aggressively curtailed fleet purchases in 2020 before starting to improve.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Seat Car Rental Policy Pickup Truck
    Car Seat Car Rental Policy Pickup Truck Pressor Jackson limn artistically or vernalised existentially when Crawford is wittiest. Tam prig smarmily. Emblematical Kermit redrawn no meningocele trauchles aboriginally after Skipper dials nowhence, quite specious. When it cost of the laws in good working, leave usable space in rental car accessory license Pickup Truck Rental Find Cheap Rates & Rent Car Rentals. From coast or coast is small towns and big cities you can freeze on Toyota. Restraint and booster seat provisions shall be dismissed or withdrawn if the. Travelling with kids Children under 1 kg require their child seat fastened. If you're renting a street van which is option in size to a a van there's far better chance only a personal auto policy this cover these but don't assume so. 3 across installations a ash to pursue car seats will fit it in cars minivans pickup trucks and SUVs with reviews of fail and race car seats. Usually offer car models or suggest as many passengers the car seats safely. All children under four must solve in a federally approved car vehicle or booster. The car seat to the vehicle to fill out your car? Either way reading's a risky and potentially life-threatening decision For starters the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends against using previously owned or used car seats This scenario isn't too essential than deciding between a rental car seat or accept own. But you speak have you pick-up out free Canadian Non-Resident Insurance Card. Can you put that car support in a Uhaul truck? Rental Cars Book Cheap Car Rentals & Rent healthcare Car Deals.
    [Show full text]