اجلمهورية العربية السورية وزارة التعليم العالي جامعة دمشق -كلية الزراعة قسم علوم البستنة
تأثري طول الفرتة الضوئية على إزهار نبات األضاليا Dahlia white perfection وتشكل درناته اجلذرية
Effect of photoperiod on flowering and tuberous root formation in dahlia pinnata (white perfection)
رسالة أعدت لنيل درجة املاجستري يف اهلندسة الزراعية
)) قسم علوم البستنة ((
إعداد
املهندسة ديانا محد القنطار
بإشراف األستاذ الدكتور نبيل البطل
6102-6101 م
شكر وتقدير
في البداية ال يسعني إال أن أرفع آيات التقدير واالحترام ألستاذي
الدكتور نبيل البطل الذي أمدني بالتوجييات العلمية الواسعة
والمعاملة األخالقية واإلنسانية المميزة والذي رافقني وساعدني بكل
رحابة صدر وكرم أخالق في إنجاز ىذا العمل .
وأتقدم بالشكر واالحترام لجامعة دمشق لتبنييا الموضوع وتمويليا لو.
كما أتوجو بالشكر إلى قسم علوم البستنة في كلية الزراعة لما قدمو من
دعم ومساعدات جمة.
وكل الشكر واالمتنان إلى كلية الزراعة الثانية في السويداء وكل
العاملين فييا لما قدموه من تسييالت مادية ومعنوية إلنجاز ىذا العمل
وأخص بالشكر المكتب اليندسي .
شكر خاص و تقدير لزوجي وأىلي وأصدق ائي و لألخت والصديقة
الميندسة عال العيسى على جيودىا المبذولة . Index
0 Introduction 0 9 Literature review 6 09 Research objectives 3 61 Materials and methods 4 61 0 4
60 6 4
65 Results 5 65 Flowering time 0 5 65 Flower number 6 5 62 Tuberous dry weight 3 5 62 4 5 61 tuberous number 5 5 62 Plant lenghth ) 2 5 31 total Leaf area 6 1 5 specific Leaf 6 2 5 31 weight 36 Discussion 2 32 Conclusion Suggestions 1 31 References : 2 0 0 2 6 61 2 3 63 Alaska fort 4 64 5 62 2 61 1 30 8 2 2 0 2 6 69 3 2102 2102 Dahlia pinnata white perfection
T1
T2
T3 28.70 022.2
013.2 71.8 90.3 28.80
02 88 03
98.2 92 03.2 28.9 88.8 T3 72.19 T2 019.2 T1 371 7 T1 022.7 0831 232.9 T3 281.8 T2
Summary The Experiment was conducted in the glasshouse of the second Faculty of Agriculture, Swieda ,during the seasons of 2015 – 2016. The objectives were to study the effect of photo period on the flowering of Dahlia pinnata (white flower) and tubers formation. The first treatment was the control where plants put to grow under natural light condition. Second treatment, which have been cut natural photoperiod in one hour (T1). Third treatment, which have been cut natural photoperiod in two hours (T2). Fourth treatment which have been cut natural photoperiod in three hours (T3). The results showed significant superiority of the treatment two hours and treatment three hours with values 57.81 % and 152.5% respectively in relation to the tuberous production and tubers dry weight in comparison to the control. . Also it was an increase in wet weight of tubers in all transactions by 31.9%, 80.4%, 109.2%. the results also showed a decrease in the number of tubers in the treatment of three hours by 27.41% while the results did not show a significant difference in the number of tubers between the one hour and two hours comparison to the control. The results also showed significant delay in flowering dates in the three treatments in comparison to the control. It was (15 days -19 days) in one hour and two hours respectively. While the plant in three hours showed the most significant delay (44 days) in comparison to the control. It was also noted that the photoperiod affect in the average number of flowers formed, Where no significant difference observed between the control and the treatment of one hour, where the average number of flowers 34.6 and 35 respectively. The number of flowers is significantly decreased in the two treatments two and three houer to (27.3,19.5) flowers respectively. Plant hight and leaf area were decreased in studied cultivar in all treatments. Average Plant hights in all treatments (103.6 cm, 85.03 cm,74.4 cm) respectively, while it was 126.8 cm in the control plants. Total Leaf areas of plant were (980.8 cm²) in T1 and (670.7 cm²) in T2 and (296.3 cm²) in T3 in comparison to the control (1490 cm²). Introduction 0
Tuberous roots
91 2
Vernon,2013
Asteraceae 0 Hansen, 2004
Kingdom Plantae
Order Asterales Family Asteraceae
Subfamily Asteroideae Genus Dahlia Species Pinnata
1
0
D.pinnata-D.imperialis- 9811 0211 D.coccinea
0329
2
Kral,2014 0782
28111 .RHS(Royal Horticultural Society)
Anders Dahli Cavillis
Kral,2014 Sorensen,1990
9 0.2
Cranshaw,2009
3
2 2
1.2 91 22
(Weland,2007
Single
Cactus
021 021 Semi Cactus
:Collerette
4
011 31 Anemone
021 021 Pompom
Decorative 97 2 Fimbriated
Waterlily
Black.2005 22 21 22 01 02 2 01
5
6
R = AN = AA = 25 W = BA = A = 2 5 20 Y = CO = B = 20 15 PR = SC = BB = 1 5 1 0 OR = S = M = 10 DR = FD = BA = 9 P = POM= MB = 9 - 5 BR = PE = P = 5 [email protected]
2112
2118
211111 99 0392 (Jobson,2015)
6
07 02 28 07
09 02 91 21 00 7 2 9 2112
7
0 0 0 0 0 2118 Kiran D.pinnata
2100 Khan
EC PH Ph 8 2.2 2112 Gorman 2102 blodnick
EC 0 (0.80-0.75)EC 2.2)EC 0.2 (EC
6
8
6
Photoperiodism
HA. WW .Garner 0321 Nicotiana tabacum Allard Maryland Mammoth Smith,2000
08
2112 critical 08 09 photoperiod
9
Runkle,2002 02
Mattson,Erwin.2005 Erwin,Warner.2002
Vince,1969
daylenghth
Waide,2010
Pfr Pr 221 Pr Pfr 891 Pr ( Fankhauser,2004 Jarillo,2001
chromoproteins tetrapyrrol
11
Andel et al,1996 Parks and Quail,1991
Tepperman and Quail,1998
221 Pr 0 8 Pr Pfr 2 Quail,1997
Pfr Pfr Pr Pfr
Pfr Pr
0378
Pfr Pr Pr 7 Pfr 7 Pr Pfr Pfr Pr
11
Pr Pfr 09 Pfr Pr
digana et al ,2011
Pfr
Pr
0328 Siegelman Firir
Phy A,B,C,D,E Sharrock PhyA ,PhyB and Clach ,2002 PhyC ,PhyE and Quail, 1989 Franklin and Lin,2000 Pfr Sharrock Quail,2010 0 Cryptochromes 2
Smith,2000 Phototropins 9
Somwrs et al,1998
12
Chrysanthemum ramat Pfr morifolium
0 Pr 91 02 Borthwick 02 21 and Cathey,2016 Chrysanthemum yellow
King and Bagnall,1994) Lolium temulentum 02
King and Evans,1991
13
Pfr
Shalit et 2 8 al,2008 Juliusvon sachs 0722
Kroeze ,2015 1936 Chailakhyan
2112 Putterill RNAm FT and Gasic,2008
14
Hanlon,2016 Xanthium strumarium Pharbitis nil
Valverde,2000
Runkle,2002
2112 (02
Biran,Halevy.2006
15
0323 Hess Moser 00 20 02
(0322 konishi Inaba
0387 Payne Halburton
0388 Hertogh Durso D.Kolchelsee 08 01 D.Parkprincess
0339 Heins Brondum
Royal dahlitta yellow 82 91 21 01 02 01 02 22 02 91 21 21 08 02
16
D.Sanny 2110 Legnani Millar 3 D.Sanny yellow rose 02 21 3
29 22
2.8 21
0323 Hitchcock Zimmerman
2113 Hasegawa D. imperialis
91 21
17
92 89
18
Research objectives 3
Dahlia white perfection 0 2
19
Materials & Methods 4 0 4
Dahlia pinnata( white perfection
Dinnerplat Decorative 22 21 021 011
21 81 81
0:0:0 2 TS2 Peatmoss 6 3 211 2.2 2.2 PH 1.2 32 72 2 221 221 2108
21
6 4
27 22
21
2 01
21
2102 0
09 02 T1
08 02 T2
02 02 T3
91
8 Alaska fort 011 011
22
Alaska fort 4
0. 005%(FE EDTA) 18%(n) 0.01%(ZN EDTA) 07%(p205) 0.03%(MN EDTA) 07%(k2o) 0.05%(CU EDTA) 0 Mgo 0.02%(B EDTA) 0.03%(MO EDTA)
Methonyl90 Admix
6 Leaf area A4
01 A4 2 011 01
011
23
Tuberous dry weight
87 012
SLW 6
2
2101 Open Flowers number flowering time
5
8 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 8 2 8 8 8 8 9
24
Results 5 0 5
2
98 2
03 78 02 23
6 5
2 98.2 92
88.9 22 2
25
2 LSD SD Mean N
2.2 92.1 02 1.21 2.2 98.2 02 1.117 0.2 28.9 02 1.118 0.9 03.2 02
2.2 23.08 87 Total
0.3 39.30 02 1.118 0.1 013.21 02 1.112 0.9 009.82 02 1.118 0.8 027.22 02 02.2 009.32 87 Total
LSD SD Mean N 2 3 5
8
013.2 71.8 90.3
4 5
8
26
2 5 5
28.80
7
1 LSD SD Mean N 1.19 7.88 02 1.21 1.18 7.27 02 1.117 1.88 09.92 02 1.112 1.31 20.90 02 2.9 02.31 87 Total
02.3 81.2 02 1.117 29.2 39.1 02 1.118 02.2 028.2 02 1.112 29.7 088.2 02 92.2 013.2 87 Total
0.8 2.2 02 1.2 0.9 2.2 02 1.3 2.1 2.9 02 1.10 0.3 8.2 02 0.7 2.2 87 Total LSD SD Mean N 2
27
2 5
LSD 8 SPSS 2
81.92 28.30 82.22 27.82 80.37 22.22 80.92 92.22 9 2
28
3
29
1 5 7
2 LSD
2 0831 2 281.88 2 371.79 2 232.99 71.00 82.12 98.08
2 5 7
2
07
31
8
LSD SD Mean N
982.12 0831.1 02
1.113 72.18 371.79 02
1.117 70.33 281.88 02
1.112 89.22 232.99 02
70.22 312.28 87 Total
1.10 1.198 02
1.2 1.119 1.197 02
1.8 1.112 1.197 02
1.102 1.118 1.188 02
1.1182 1.193 87 Total
LSD SD Mean N 2
31
Discussion 2
Dahlia white perfection
Pfr
Pr Pfr
Pr
Pr Pfr
02 2000 Weaver (D.pinnata
32
22
0323 Hess Moser
20 02 00
0323 Hitchcock Zimmerman
2112 Millar fructan
33
2006 Halevy Biran
Inaba (0322 konishi
Brondum
34
Royal dahlitta yellow 82 0339 Heins 21 02 02 Hasegawa 2113 D. imperialis
0387 Payne Halburton
35
Conclusion Suggestions 1
0
2 02
9
0
2
9
36
Referances 2
2112 0 008 002 2112 2 81 2 9 0378 8 972 972 2101 1. Andel , F., J.C. Lagarias, R.A. Mathies. 1996.Resonance raman analysis of chromophore structure in the lumi-R photoproduct of phytochrome. Biochemistry. 35:15997–16008. 2. Biran, I., A. H. Halevy. 1973 .The Relationship Between Rooting of Dahlia Cuttings and the Presence and Type of Bud. Department of Ornamental Horticulture. The Hebrew University. 28 :244-247. 3. Brondum, J.J., R. D. Heins.1993. Modeling Temperature and Photoperiod Effects on Growth and Development of Dahlia. Department of Horticulture. Michigan State University.vol:118 (1):36- 42. 4. Burgess, C . 2013. Cultivation of the Dahlia. London: 6-35.8 5. Blair,A. 2011.The Delight of Indoor Dahlias.Grow blooming plants indoors. March.12-18. 6. Black ,D. 2005.Dahlias.washington state university.5:26-30.2 7. Borthwick, H. A., H. M. Cathey.2016. Role of Phytochrome in Control of Flowering of Chrysanthemum . The Pennsylvania State University.123:1-5. 8. Cranshaw,W. 2009.Relative ranking of ornamental flower plants to foraging honey bees.22-35. 9. Clack ,T., S.Mathews, R.A. Sharrock. 1994.The phytochrome apoprotein family in Arabidopsis is encoded by five genes: the
37
sequences and expression of PHYD and PHYE. Plant Mol. Biol. 25:413–427. 10. Claren,B. 2004.Success With Cuttings. March. American Dahlia Society.220-300. 11. Clack ,T., S.Mathews, R.A. Sharrock. 1994.The phytochrome apoprotein family in Arabidopsis is encoded by five genes: the sequences and expression of PHYD and PHYE. Plant Mol. Biol. 25:413–427. 12. Davis, S.J., J.Kurepa, R.D. Vierstra . 1999.The Arabidopsis thaliana HY1 locus, required for phytochrome-chromophore biosynthesis, encodes a protein related to heme oxygenases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:6541–6546. 13. Deng, X.W., P.H. Quail . 1999.Signalling in light-controlled development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:121–129. 14. Erwin,J.E., R.M. Warner.2002.Determination of photoperiodic response group and effect of supplemental irradiance on flowering of several bedding plant species. Acta Hort 580:95-99. 15. Fankhauser, C. 2001.The phytochromes, a family of red/far-red absorbing photoreceptors. J. Biol. Chem. 276:11453–11456. 16. Franklin, K.A., P.H.Quail. 2010.Phytochrome functions in Arabidopsis development .61:11–24. 17. Gorman, R. 2005.Natural Resources and Community Development, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Alaska Fairbanks.pp:83- 84. 18. Hansen, H. V. 2004. Simplified keys to four sections with 34 species in the genus Dahlia (Asteraceae-Coreopsideae). 24:549-553. 19. Hankins,A. 2005.Production of dahlia as cut flowers.virginia state agriculture university.125-135. 20. Hong,L .2010.Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer on the morphological indexes and physiological characteristics of Dahlia pinnata.452-511. 21. Hasegawa, A., N. Kobayashi, C . Muraki, T. Takagi, T. Koutaka . 2009. Effect of Planting Time and Short-Day Treatment on Growth and Flowering of Dahlia imperialis. Acta hort.ISHS.:587-592. 22. Halburton,M.A ., R.N. Payne. 1978. Effects of photoperiod on growth and flowering of Dahlia pinnata Redskin pot plants. 735:1-19.
38
23. Hanlon,V.2016.Florigen:The Hidden Hormone.the science creative quarterly.5-10. 24. Jarillo,J.A., J. Capel, R. Tang, H. Yang, J. M. Alonso, J. R. Ecker , A.R. Cashmore. 2001. Plants use a phytochrome system to sense the level, intensity, duration, and color of environmental light to adjust their physiology. 410: 487 - 490 . 25. King, R.W., D.J. Bagnall .phytochrome plant grwoth and flowring.1994.95:1-10. 26. King, R.W., L.T. Evans. 1991. Shoot apex sugars in relation to long- day reduction of flowering in Lolium temulentum. Plant Physiol. 18:121-135. 27. Kroeze,D. 2015.Florigen, the flowering hormone.2015.1-5. 28. Konishi,K., K.Inaba.1966. Studies on flowering control of dahlia. Effects of day-length on initiation and development of flower buds. Hort. 35:73-79. 29. Kral,M. Dahlia Maythes and Aztec mythology the dahlia in history.2- 30. 30. Khan ,M., M. Ahsan. 2011. Agricultural and municipal waste as potting media components for the growth and fl owering of Dahlia hortensis Figaro. 378-385. 31. Khan,M.Q., M. Kiran, and J. Baloch.2007. Effect of different growing media on the growth and development of Dahlia(Dahlia pinnata)under-climatic.:22-25. 32. Legnani,G ., W. B. Miller. 2001. Using Photoperiod to Manipulate Flowering and Tuberous Root Formation in Seed Dahlias .Department of Horticulture Cornell University. 11(13):36-40. 33. Lin,Ch. Photoreceptors and Regulation of Flowering Time.2000. University of California.123:39-50. 34. Moore,B. 2008.Culture Information for the Dahlietta Dahlia Series.224-352. www.billmooreco.com 35. Millar,L. 2002.Short photoperiod induce fructan accumulation and tuberous root development in Dahlia seedlings plant science. 149(3) 449-454. 36. Mancinelli , A.L. 1994.The physiology of phytochrome action, Photomorpho genesis in plants. Kluwer Academic. 211–269.
39
37. Mattson,N.S .,and J.E. Erwin .2005.The impact of photoperiod and irradiance on flowering of several herbaceous ornamentals.Sci.Hort.104:275-292. 38. Putterill,J.,E.V.Gasic.2008. FT and florigen long-distance flowering control in plants.10:325-361. 39. Park, DH., D.E. Somers, Y.S. Kim, Y.H. Choy, H.K. Lim, M.S. Soh, H.J. Kim, S.A. Kay, H.G. Nam. 1999. Control of circadian rhythms and photoperiodic flowering by the Arabidopsis GIGANTEA gene. Science 285: 1579–1582. 40. Parks, B.M., P.H. Quail. 1991.Phytochrome- deficient hy1 and hy2 long hypocotyl mutants of Arabidopsis are defective in phytochrome chromophore biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 3:1177–1186. 41. Quail, P.H. 1997.The phytochromes: a biochemical mechanism of signaling in sight. BioEssays. 19:571–579. 42. Dahlia myths.2009. Mid Island Dahlia Society.623-650. Pryor,M.82 43. Runkle, E . 2002 .Crop cultivation Controlling Photoperiod. October 90-93. 44. Shalit , A., A. Rozman, A. Goldshmidt, J. P. Alvarez, J. L.Bowman, Y.Eshed and E. Lifschitz.2009. The flowering hormone florigen functions as a general systemic regulator of growth and termination.18:287-294. 45. Souza,J. 2011.Effect of the irrigation with residual wastewaters on microbial soil activity of the ornamental flowers ( Dahlia pinnata) cultures monitored by isothermal calorimetry.142-235. 46. Sardoie,A., S. Fahraji, and H. Ghasemi.2014.Effects of different growing media on growth and flowing of Zinnia.2:874-895. 47. Sorensen,P. 1990.the dahlia An Early History. 1-18. 48. Smith,H.2000. Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants— an emerging synthesis.407:585-591. 49. Sharrock ,R.A., T. Clack . 2002.Patterns of expression and normalized levels of the five Arabidopsis phytochromes. Plant Physiol.130:442– 456. 50. Sharrock, R.A., P.H.Quail. 1989.Novel phytochrome sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana: structure, evolution, and differential expression of a plant regulatory photoreceptor family. Genes Dev. 3:1745–1757.
41
51. Somers, D.E., W.Y. Kim. 2004 .Geng R. The F-box protein ZEITLUPE confers dosage-dependent control on the circadian clock, photomorphogenesis, and flowering time. Plant Cell. 16:769–782 52. Tepperman, Ni M., JM. Quail.1998. Phytochrome 22 Light Regulates Plant Growth and Development .95(5):657-671. 53. Taylor,D.M. 2013.The Effect of Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilization on Growth and Nutrient Content of Container Grown Dahlia Magic. ASHS Annual conference.456-469. 54. Vernon,A. 2014 .The plant lover's to Dahlia. London.book . 6-193 55. Vince,D.1969.The regulation of flowering in long-day plants. Acta. Hort. 14:91-95. 56. Valverde, F., A. Mouradov, W. Soppe, D. Ravenscroft, A. Samach, G. Coupland, 2004. Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering. Science. 303 (5660): 1003. 57. Waide,P.2010.phase out of incandescent lamps.11-25. 58. Weland,G.the alpha-omega of dahlia.American dahlia society.:1-45. 59. Weaver, J. E., W. J. Himmel. 1929. Relation between the development of Root system and Shoot under Long -and Short-Day Illumination.University of Nebraska. Agronomy and Horticulture Department. Plant Physiology. 4: 435-457. 60. Zimmerman, P. W., A. E. Hitchcock. 1929. Root Formation and Flowering of Dahlia Cuttings When Subjected to Different Day Lengths . The University of Chicago Press . 87(1): 1-13.
41