MMR Vaccine, Thimerosal and Regressive Or Late Onset Autism (“Autistic Enterocolitis”) a Review of the Evidence for a Link Between Vaccination and Regressive Autism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MMR Vaccine, Thimerosal and Regressive or Late Onset Autism (“Autistic Enterocolitis”) A Review of the Evidence for a Link Between Vaccination and Regressive Autism David Thrower, 49, Ackers Road, Stockton Heath, Warrington, England June 2005 email [email protected] Contents Executive Summary Part A: A Novel Syndrome 1. What Is Acquired Autism/Autistic Enterocolitis 2. The New Syndrome Part B: The Scale of the Autism Problem 3. The Financial Costs - Autism Is Costing The Taxpayer £$Billions 4. Overall Cost Estimates 5. Failure to Monitor Increases In UK Autism Numbers 6. “Now Almost Everyone Knows Someone Who’s Autistic” 7. Is Autism Increasing Due To Changes In Criteria? 8. Autistic Disorder 9. Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified 10. Asperger’s 11. Paper by Mark Blaxill, June 2001 12. University of Cambridge Research 13. University of Sunderland Research 14. UK National Autistic Society Estimates 15. Report by Fiona Loynes, UK All Party Parliamentary Group, Dec. 2001 16. Report, “Autism In Schools”, UK National Autistic Society May 2002 17. Autism in Scottish Schools 18. Is Autism Increasing? - Some Official UK Pronouncements 19. Autism In The USA 20. The US Amish Community 21. Autism Elsewhere Part C: MMR 22. The Introduction of MMR 23. Recognised Adverse Reactions to MMR 24. US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) 25. Contraindications To Receiving MMR 26. The UK Department of Health’s Position over MMR and Autism 27. Single Vaccines In The UK 28. Measles In The UK and US 29. Promotion of MMR In The UK After Wakefield “Early Report” 30. Position of the US Centers For Disease Control on MMR/Autism 31. The Parents Have Seen What They’ve Seen..... Part D: The Thimerosal/Thiomersal* Issue (*the two terms are interchangeable) 32. Thimerosal’s Possible Role 33. Joint Statement by American Acad. Of Ped./PH Service, July 1999 34. Removal of Thimerosal 35. Interview With Neal Halsey, Johns Hopkins University, Nov 2002 36. Waters & Kraus Press Release, 2002 37. Statement by Safe Minds group, US 38. US Use of Thimerosal - Statement by Dr. Geier, 2004 39. Thimerosal’s Use in the US 40. UK Vaccines With Thimerosal 41. UK Med. and Healthcare Regulatory Agency Position on Thimerosal 42. UK Joint C’ttee on Vaccin & Immunisation Position on Thimerosal 43. UK Department of Health’s Position on Thimerosal 44. US CDC Thimerosal Studies 45. Report, “Mercury In Medicines”, US C’ttee on Govt. Reform 2003 46. Letter to Congress by the US Office of Special Counsel, 2004 47. California Votes To Ban Thimerosal, June 2004 48. US CDC’s Current Position on Thimerosal 49. Memo by Merck Part E: Evidence That Autism Increases Are Real 50. Paper by Mark Blaxill, The Rising Incidence of Autism 51. Close-Up On California 52. The MIND Study, California 53. Close-Up On New Jersey 54. Atlanta Study, 2003 55. Paper by Gurney, Fritz et al, Trends on ASD In Minnesota, 2003 56. Paper by Yazbak, Autism In The US, J of A Phs & Surg 2003 57. Paper by Yazbak, Autism In Quebec, 2004 Part F: Reviews Questioning the Autism Epidemic 58. Paper by Fombonne, UK Med Research Council, Pediatrics, Jan 2001 59. Paper by Wing, Centre for Social & Commun. Disorders, London 2002 60. Position of Dr. B. S. Siegal, University of California, 2002 61. Study by Croen et al, July 2002 62. Editorial by Fombonne, J of the American Medical Asscn., January 2003 63. Paper by Jick et al, Boston Un Sch of Med, Pharmacotherapy, Dec 2003 64. Study by Smeeth, Fombonne et al, November 2004 65. Study by Barbarisi et al, January 2005 Part G: The MMR Original Safety Trials Debate 66. Wakefield & Montgomery “Through A Glass Darkly” (MMR safety) 67. Dr. Peter Fletcher Commentary, J of Adverse Drug Reactions, 2001 68. Dr. Stephen Dealler Commentary, J. of Adverse Drug Reactions, 2001 69. Dr. F. E. Yazbak Commentary, J of Adverse Drug Reaction, 2001 70. The Wakefield/Watson/Shattock Rebuttals 71. The UK Dept of Health’s Repudiation of “Through A Glass Darkly”. Part H: Studies and Papers That Point Towards The Plausibility Of Gut/Autism, MMR/Gut/Autism, Thimerosal/Autism and Autoimmunity/Autism Links 72. Paper by Nelson & Gottshall, Applied Microbiology, May 1967 73. Paper by Eggers, Klinical Paediatrics, March 1976 74 Weizman, Weizmann et al Study, Am. J of Psychiatry, Nov. 1982 75. Delgiudice-Asch and Hollander Study 76. Paper by Dr. H. Fudenberg 77. Paper by Dr. Reed Warren 78. Warren and Singh Study, Immunogenetics, 1992 79. Singh, Warren, Odell, Warren and Cole Paper, March 1993 80. Singh, Warren, Odell et al Study, Brain Behaviour, March 1993 81. Oleske and Zecca paper 82. Binstock paper 83. Anne-Marie Plesner Letter, Lancet, February 1995 84. Paper by Thompson, Montgomery et al, Lancet, April 1995 85. Gupta, Aggarwal & Heads Study, J of Autism and Dev Disorders, 1996 86. Montinari, Favoino and Roberto paper, Naples conference May 1996 87. Auwaerter & Griffin paper, Clin Immunol & Immunopath, May 1996 88. Cook, Courchesne et al Paper, Molecular Psychiatry, May 1996 89. Griffin and Hussy Study, Journal of Infectious Diseases, June 1996 90. Martinez et al Study, Proceedings of National Acad of Sciences, 1997 91. Paper by Zecca, Graffino et al, Meeting of Nat Inst of Health, Sept. 1997 92. Weibel, Caserta and Evans Study, March 1998 93. Wakefield et al “Early Report”, Lancet, February 1998 94. Paper by Montgomery, Morris et al (pub. date/details not yet known) 95. Sabra, Bellanti and Colon letter, Lancet, July 1998 96. Further Paper by Singh and Yang, Pharmaceutical Jnl, October 1998 97. Uhlmann, Sheils et al Paper 98. Bitnun et al Study, Clinical Infectious Diseases Journal, October 1999 99. Paper by Horvath, Papadimitriou et al, Journal of Pediatrics Nov 1999 100. Paper by Singh to the US Committee on Govt Reform, April 2000 101. O’Leary Paper Presented to Congressional Oversight C’ttee, April 2000 102. Kawashima, Takayuki et al Study, Digestive Dis and Sciences, Apr 2000 103. Confidential Review, US CDC, Simpsonwood, June 2000 104. Hagenbuch, Kullak-Ublick et al Study, J of Pharm Exp Ther, July 2000 105. Wakefield et al Paper, American J. of Gastroenterology, September 2000 106. Statement by Professor Walter O. Spitzer, December 2000 107. Furlano, Anthony et al Study, Journal of Pediatrics, 2001 108. Paper by Enayati et al, Medical Hypotheses, 2001 109. Study by Jyonouchi, Sun and Le, J. of Allergy & Clin. Immun., Feb. 2001 110. Study by Jyonouchi, Sun and Le, J of Neuroimmunology, 2001 111. Paper by Spitzer, Aitken et al, J of Adverse Drug Reactions & Tox., 2001 112. Study by Holmes, Cave et al, June 2001 113. Paper by Blaxill, Institute of Medicine, July 2004 114. Paper by Dr. Ken Aitken to the Scottish Society for Autism, 2001 115. Paper by Imani and Kehoe, Clinical Immunology, September 2001 116. Paper by Redwood, Bernard et al, Neurotoxicology, October 2001 117. Paper by Buie, Oasis 2001 Conference for Autism, Portland, US 118. Paper by Uhlmann, Wakefield et al, J. of Clinical Pathology, Feb. 2002 119. Paper by Singh and Nelson, February 2002 120. Review by Wakefield, Pulestone et al, Aliment Pharm. Ther. 2002 121. Report of Study, Comi et al, Johns Hopkins Hosp, Baltimore, Apr 2002 122. Paper by Torrente, Ashwood, Day et al, Lancet, May 2002. 123. Paper to 102nd GM of Am. Soc for Microbiology, Singh et al, May 2002 124. Study by O’Leary et al to Path Soc of GB and Ireland July 2002 125. Wakefield Paper Presented to US Govt Reform Committee, June 2002 126. Paper to US Government Reform C’ttee by Dr Krigsman, June 2002 127. Unpublished Research by Shattock, Un. of Sunderland, June 2002 128. Paper by Sheils, Smyth, Martin & O’Leary, Trinity Coll Dublin, 2002 129. Paper by Dr. Vijendra Singh, Utah State University, August 2002 130. Paper by Finegold, Molitoris, Song, J. Of Clin. Infect. Dis., Sept 2002 131. Further paper, Jyonouchi, Sun & Itokazu, Un. of Minnesota, Oct 2002 132. Paper, Treat. of Late Onset Autism, Matarazzo, U.S-Paulo, Nov 2002 133. Paper by Makani, Gollapudi et al, Genes & Immunity, 2002 134. Paper by Westphal, Asgari et al, Arch of Toxicology, August 2002 135. Unpublished letter by Wakefield to New Eng. J. of Medicine, Nov 2002 136. Study by Croonenberghs et al, University of Antwerp, December 2002 137. Paper by Holmes, Blaxill & Haley, Internat J of Toxicology 2003 138. Paper by Singh and Jensen, Pediatric Neurology 2003 139. Paper by Geier & Geier, Soc. for Experimental Biology & Med. 2003 140. Study by Geier and Geier, International Pediatrics, May 2003 141. Further Paper by Geier & Geier, Ped. Rehabilitation, Apr-June 2003 142. Further Paper by Geier & Geier, J of Am Phys and Surg, Spring 2003 143. Paper by Blaxill, Redwood & Bernard, Safe Minds 144. Paper by Bradstreet, Geier et al, J of Am Phy and Surg Summer 2003 145. Letter by Geier & Geier, J of Am Phys. & Surgeons, Summer 2003 146. Paper by Baskin, Ngo et al, Toxicology Science Aug 2003 147. Paper by Via, Nguyen et al, Envir. Health Perspectives August 2003 148. Paper by Sweeten, Bowyer et al, Pediatrics, November 2003 149. Paper by Ashwood, Murch et al, J of Clinical Immunology, Nov 2003 150. Study by Ueha-Ashibishi, Oyama et al, Toxicology, Jan 2004 151. Paper by Jyonouchi, Geng et al, Jan 2004 152. Paper by Singh, presented to the Inst. of Med, Washington, Feb 2004 153. Paper by Bradstreet, Inst of Medicine, Washington, Feb 2004 154. Paper by Bradstreet, O’Leary et al, Inst of Medicine, Feb 2004 155. Further Paper by Bradstreet, Institute of Medicine, Feb 2004 156. Presentation by Geier and Geier to the Institute of Medicine, Feb 2004 157.