DOCSLIB.ORG

What Is the “Acts 9/28 Hybrid System” of Theology? Is It Sound Bible Hermeneutics? Or the Traditions of Men with a “Grace Face?”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Is the “Acts 9/28 Hybrid System” of Theology? Is It Sound Bible Hermeneutics? Or the Traditions of Men with a “Grace Face?” What is the “Acts 9/28 hybrid system” of theology? Is it sound Bible hermeneutics? Or the traditions of men with a “grace face?” by Shawn Brasseaux arC Ministries [email protected] For What Saith the Scriptures? https://forwhatsaiththescriptures.wordpress.com SPECIAL EDITION BIBLE Q&A ARTICLE #200 27 OCTOBER 2015 VERSION 1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. FOUR BRIEF INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS ........................................................... 5 II. TERMS AND BACKGROUND, IN BRIEF .................................................................... 6 III. MY OWN BRIEF TESTIMONY CONCERNING ACTS 2, ACTS 9, AND ACTS 28 TEACHING .................................................................................................................... 8 IV. 15+ “PROOF TEXTS” OF “ACTS 9/28 HYBRID THEOLOGY” ......................... 10 1. Acts 22:21 associated fallacies – Was this Jesus Christ commissioning Paul a second time? ............................................................................................................................................. 10 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of Acts 22:21 ............................................................................................. 10 B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of Acts 22:21 ............................................................................. 10 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of Acts 22:21 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) . 11 2. Acts 26:16-18 associated fallacies – What are the “these things” and the “those things?” ......................................................................................................................................... 16 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of Acts 26:16-18 ........................................................................................ 16 B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of Acts 26:16-18 ....................................................................... 16 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of Acts 26:16-18 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 18 3. Acts 28:20 associated fallacies – What is the “hope of Israel?” ......................................... 20 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of Acts 28:20 ............................................................................................. 20 B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of Acts 28:20 ............................................................................. 20 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of Acts 28:20 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) . 21 4. Acts 28:28 associated fallacies – Israel’s fall? ....................................................................... 21 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of Acts 28:28 ............................................................................................. 21 B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of Acts 28:28 ............................................................................. 21 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of Acts 28:28 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) . 22 5. Romans 1:16 associated fallacies – “To the Jew first, and also to the Greek?” ............. 23 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of Romans 1:16 ........................................................................................ 23 B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of Romans 1:16 ........................................................................ 23 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of Romans 1:16 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 23 6. Romans 16:25-26 associated fallacies – Mystery hid in Old Testament? ...................... 27 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of Romans 16:25-26 ................................................................................ 27 A Refutation of Acts 9/28 Hybrid Theology 2 Shawn Brasseaux B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of Romans 16:25-26 ............................................................... 27 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of Romans 16:25-26 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) ....................................................................................................................................................... 28 7. 1 Corinthians 9:17 associated fallacies – “A dispensation of the gospel” ....................... 28 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of 1 Corinthians 9:17 .............................................................................. 29 B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of 1 Corinthians 9:17 ............................................................. 29 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of 1 Corinthians 9:17 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) ....................................................................................................................................................... 29 8. 1 Corinthians 15:3 associated fallacies – Whose “sins?” .................................................... 31 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of 1 Corinthians 15:3 .............................................................................. 31 B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of 1 Corinthians 15:3 ............................................................. 31 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of 1 Corinthians 15:3 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) ....................................................................................................................................................... 32 9. Galatians 3:29 & Galatians 4:28 associated fallacies – Did the “Acts” members of the Body of Christ inherit Israel’s covenants and promises? .................................................. 32 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of Galatians 3:29 & Galatians 4:28 ..................................................... 32 B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of Galatians 3:29 & Galatians 4:28 .................................... 32 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of Galatians 3:29 & Galatians 4:28 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) ..................................................................................................................................... 34 10. Ephesians 1:12 & Ephesians 2:11-13 associated fallacies – Who are those “who first trusted in Christ?” ..................................................................................................................... 38 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of Ephesians 1:12 .................................................................................... 38 B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of Ephesians 1:12 ................................................................... 38 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of Ephesians 1:12 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) ....................................................................................................................................................... 39 11. Ephesians 2:14-15 associated fallacies – When was “the middle wall of partition” broken down? .............................................................................................................................. 41 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of Ephesians 2:14-15 .............................................................................. 41 B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of Ephesians 2:14-15 .............................................................. 41 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of Ephesians 2:14-15 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) ....................................................................................................................................................... 41 12. Ephesians 3:2 associated fallacies – Did the Dispensation of Grace begin near or at the end of Acts? .......................................................................................................................... 42 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of Ephesians 3:2 ...................................................................................... 42 B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of Ephesians 3:2 ...................................................................... 43 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of Ephesians 3:2 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 43 13. Ephesians 3:6 associated fallacies – Were there two Bodies of Christ, one during Acts and another after Acts? ................................................................................................... 44 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of Ephesians 3:6 ...................................................................................... 44 A Refutation of Acts 9/28 Hybrid Theology 3 Shawn Brasseaux B. “Acts 9/28 hybrid” interpretation of Ephesians 3:6 ...................................................................... 44 C. “Acts 9” interpretation of Ephesians 3:2 (flaws of “Acts 9/28 hybrid” and “Acts 28” exposed) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 45 14. Philippians 4:15 associated fallacies – “The beginning of the gospel” .......................... 46 A. “Acts 28” interpretation of Philippians 4:15 .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hyperdispensationalism 7 Wikipedia Articles
    Hyperdispensationalism 7 Wikipedia Articles PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:24:24 UTC Contents Articles Hyperdispensationalism 1 E. W. Bullinger 5 John Darby (evangelist) 8 Charles Caldwell Ryrie 12 Charles Henry Welch 13 Pauline Christianity 16 Ultradispensationalism 23 References Article Sources and Contributors 25 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 26 Article Licenses License 27 Hyperdispensationalism 1 Hyperdispensationalism Part of a series on Christianity Christianity portal Grace Movement Dispensationalism (Hyper-dispensationalism, Mid-Acts Dispensationalism.,[1] ultra-dispensationalism,[2] or more rarely "Bullingerism"[3]) is a Protestant doctrine that views the teachings of the Apostle Paul both as unique from earlier apostles and as foundational for the church, a perspective sometimes characterized by proponents as the "Pauline Distinctive."[4] E. W. Bullinger (1837–1913), an Anglican clergyman and scholar, is the best known early expositor of Acts 28 hyper-dispensationalism, although the ideas trace back further to John Nelson Darby (1800–1882). Hyper-dispensationalism is rejected by mainstream dispensationalism, which holds that the Church began at Pentecost[5] long prior to Paul's conversion to Christianity as described early in the New Testament book entitled "Acts of the Apostles." Popular dispensationalist Harry A. Ironside (1876–1951) declared Bullingerism an "absolutely Satanic perversion of the truth." [6] Anti-dispensationalists simultaneously admire hyper-dispensationalism as a "consistent Dispensationalism" and condemn it as much like a "cult or sect."[7] Evangelicals reject adherents as "divisive."[8] Except for a few obscure dissertations, there has been no substantial investigation of the hyper-dispensational position and its strengths.
    [Show full text]
  • Ifs, Ands, and Buts: the Two Inheritance Controversy of Romans 8:17
    Ifs, Ands, and Buts: The Two Inheritance Controversy of Romans 8:17 By: Bryan C. Ross Revised 2nd Edition June, 2014 These are not the same: Joint-Heir (Rom. 8:17)—“A heir having a joint interest with another.” (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary) Reign (II Tim. 2:12)—“1) To possess or exercise sovereign power or authority; to rule; to exercise government, as a king or emperor; or to hold the supreme power. 2) To be predominant; to prevail. 3) To rule; to have superior or uncontrolled dominion (Rom. 6).” (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary) Preface to the Revised Second Edition At the end of the introduction to the first edition of this paper I stated the following, “. this paper should be viewed as a snapshot of our thinking at the present time. Further study may lead to refinements in the thinking expressed in this paper which may necessitate future revisions, updates, and editions.” In the process of time, further study has revealed the need for revision that has resulted in the release of this updated second edition. What is different? The last section of the Main Argument (“Difference Between Inheritance and Rewards”) has been shorted by the removal of any discussion of suffering and reigning in II Timothy 2. I removed the comparison of the two different Greek words translated “suffer with” in Romans 8:17 and “suffer” in II Timothy 2:12. This discussion was redundant within the framework of the current essay; it will be taken up again and elaborated upon in the publication and release of a yet future paper on II Timothy 2:11-13.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Theology Historical Theologyhistorical Vol
    Journal of Theology Southwestern Historical Theology SWJT Historical Theology Vol. 56 No. 2 • Spring 2015 HISTORICAL THEOLOGY Southwestern Journal of Theology EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Paige Patterson, President and Professor of Theology MANAGING EDITOR Terry L. Wilder, Professor and Wesley Harrison Chair of New Testament EDITORIAL BOARD Keith E. Eitel, Professor of Missions and World Christianity, Dean of the Roy Fish School of Evangelism and Missions, and Director of the World Missions Center Mark A. Howell, Senior Pastor, First Baptist Church Daytona Beach Evan Lenow, Assistant Professor of Ethics, Bobby L. and Janis Eklund Chair of Stewardship, and Director of the Richard Land Center for Cultural Engagement Miles S. Mullin II, Assistant Professor of Church History, J. Dalton Havard School for Theological Studies Steven W. Smith, Vice President of Student Services and Communications and Professor of Communication Jerry Vines, Jerry Vines Ministries Joshua E. Williams, Assistant Professor of Old Testament Malcolm B. Yarnell III, Professor of Systematic Theology, Director of the Oxford Study Program, and Director of the Center for Theological Research BOOK REVIEW EDITOR AND EDITORIAL ASSISTANT David G. Norman, Jr. The Southwestern Journal of Theology is indexed in the ATLA Religion Database, the Southern Baptist Periodical Index, and the Christian Periodical Index. Southwestern Journal of Theology invites English-language submissions of original research in biblical studies, historical theology, systematic theology, ethics, philosophy of religion, homiletics, pastoral ministry, evangelism, missiology, and related fields. Articles submitted for consideration should be neither published nor under review for publication elsewhere. The recommended length of articles is between 4000 and 8000 words. For information on editorial and stylistic requirements, please contact the journal’s Editorial Assistant at journal@ swbts.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of the Church
    1 TTHHEE NNAATTUURREE OOFF TTHHEE CCHHUURRCCHH THE DEFINITION OF THE CHURCH The English word church, the Scottish word kirk, and the German word kirche come from the Greek word kuriakon which means “a place belonging to the Lord, or the Lord’s house” The word ekklesia in classical Greek (i.e. pre New Testament times) meant “assembly” Before New Testament times, there was never any special religious significance to the word – it simply meant an assembly The Greek world uses ekklesia for a popular assembly “The NT reveals a development of the term ekklesia from the simple non-technical meaning of assembly to the full blown technical designation for the Christian people of God…Through use, it became so completely identified with the specific Christian assembly that the term took on that particular meaning itself and could stand for that assembly without being confused with others. The majority of the New Testament references have this technical meaning” (Robert Saucy, The Church in God’s Program, 15-16). ekklesia is most often used in a technical sense of believers who constitute a special group of God’s people ekklesia is never used int eh NT for a church building Before the church was born (Acts 2), the word ekklesia occurs only twice in the NT (Matt 16:18; 18:17) After the church was born, it occurs 112 times 1. Some of those uses do not necessarily refer to a gathering of God’s people, but rather simply an assembly Acts 7:38 ~ This is the one who was in the congregation (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Concerning Dispensational Bible Study Just Why Not?
    CONCERNING DISPENSATIONAL BIBLE STUDY JUST WHY NOT? HEART TO HEART QUESTIONS DISPENSATIONALISM AND ULTRADISPENSATIONALISM During the last few years Christians have been warned time and again against Ultradispensationalism’ . ‘Hyperdispensationalism’ . ‘Extreme Dispensationalism.’ Some ignorant, spiritual leaders have warned their followers against any and all ‘Dispensationalism.’ The word ‘Dispensation’ is used in Ephesians 1:10 . 3:2 and 3 . 3:9 . Colossians 1:24 to 26 and I Corinthians 9:17. The Greek word is ‘OIKONOMIA . ‘Oiko’ is ‘House’ . ‘Nomia’ is ‘Law.’ This word ‘OIKONOMIA’ is translated ‘Stewardship’ in Luke 16:2, 3 and 4. We get from this Greek word our word ‘Economy.’ You see the word has the meaning of ‘The ADMINISTRATION of a HOUSE or ‘HOUSE-HOLD.’ You have heard of ‘The Roosevelt ADMINISTRATION.’ In Ephesians 4:12 we read that God is ‘EDIFYING THE BODY OF CHRIST.’ ‘EDIFY,’ in the Greek, ‘OIKODOMEO’ . ‘OIKO’ . ‘House’ . ‘DONIEO’ . ‘Build.’ The House of God, which God is building in this age and DISPENSATION OF GRACE (Ephesians 3:1 to 4), is called ‘THE CHURCH OF THE LIVING GOD; Without controversy a GREAT MYSTERY. (I Timothy 3:15 and 16 . Ephesians 5:31 and 32). This HOUSE OF GOD, in Ephesians 3:6, is called ‘SUSSOMOS’ ‘SUS’ . ‘Joint’ . ‘SOMA’ . ‘Body’ . God is building a ‘JOINT-BODY.’ In the building of this ‘CHURCH OF THE MYSTERY’ (Colossians 1:24 to 26) unto Paul was committed ‘THE DISPENSATION OF GOD’ (Colossians 1:24 to 26), and he was ordered by the risen Christ to ‘MAKE ALL SEE WHAT IS THE DISPENSATION (not fellowship) OF THE MYSTERY’ (Ephesians 3:9).
    [Show full text]
  • The Apostle Paul Hyperdispensationalism
    The Apostle Paul Hyperdispensationalism PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:35:14 UTC Contents Articles Paul the Apostle 1 Hyperdispensationalism 19 E. W. Bullinger 23 John Nelson Darby 27 Dispensationalist theology 32 Dispensationalism 40 The Way International 50 American Christian Press 59 Victor Paul Wierwille 62 Way Productions 64 The Way College of Biblical Research – Indiana Campus 66 Pauline Christianity 67 Marcion of Sinope 72 Marcionism 75 References Article Sources and Contributors 82 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 84 Article Licenses License 85 Paul the Apostle 1 Paul the Apostle Paul the Apostle Ananias of Damascus restores the sight of Saint Paul. A 1631 painting by Pietro Cortona. Apostle to the Gentiles [1] Born ca. AD 5 in Tarsus, present-day Turkey [Acts 22:3] [2] [2] Died ca. AD 67 in Rome Honored in All Christianity Major shrine Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls Feast January 25 (The Conversion of Paul) February 10 (Feast of Saint Paul's Shipwreck in Malta) June 29 (Feast of Saints Peter and Paul) November 18 (Feast of the dedication of the basilicas of Saints Peter and Paul) Attributes sword Patronage Missions; Theologians; Gentile Christians; Paul the Apostle, also called the Apostle Paul, Saul of Tarsus, and Saint Paul (c. AD 5 – c. AD 67),[2] was one of the most influential early Christian missionaries, with his writings forming a considerable portion of the New Testament. His influence on Christian thinking has been of utmost significance[3] due to his role as a prominent apostle of Christianity during the spreading of the Gospel through early Christian communities across the Roman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • CONCERNING BULLINGERISM a REPLY to O. FULLER—HAGGAI—Dehann and COMPANY” 32 Pages 126 KB Date: Est
    INDEX “THE ACCUSER OF THE BRETHREN AND THE BRETHREN” “CONCERNING BULLINGERISM A REPLY TO O. FULLER—HAGGAI—DeHANN AND COMPANY” 32 pages 126 KB Date: est. 1945. The book is an answer to a pamphlet entitled “O’Hairism” by Dr. Otis Fuller and Pastor W. A. Hagaai. It contains letters from well-known Bible teachers and others both in defense of O’Hair and other against him. The charge against O’Hair was the common one, that of Bullingerism. There are a few pages of Pastor O’Hair’s personal history going back twenty years before he was called to North Shore church. “AFTER WE LEAVE THIS WORLD” 11 pages, 24 KB This pamphlet is basically a discussion of death. It is written from the Christian’s viewpoint. The Gospel is presented and an appeal is made to receive Christ. The pamphlet ends with O’Hair’s poem “When I Say Goodbye” It could be used as a tract to the unsaved, to awaken them to what is beyond the grave. “THE ALL-SUFFICIENT MUCH MORE ABOUNDING GRACE OF THE GOD OF ALL GRACE” 23 pages, 70 KB Date: 1955 This pamphlet is truly a thesis on Grace. Pastor O’Hair first treats the Grace of God doctrinally, as the most wonderful truth that has ever been proclaimed to condemned lost sinners. He then treats the Grace of God practically. Believers saved by the all-sufficient grace are given unlimited power and unlimited grace to every good work. He then treats Grace dispensationally, showing the Grace of God active throughout all the ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Time for Truth News!
    Time for Truth News! (Issue 1 – first sent out March 2001) Moreover as for me, God forbid that I should sin against the LORD in ceasing to pray for you: but I will Issue 83 – Oct 2017 – Mar 2018 teach you the good and the right way: Only fear the Time for Truth! LORD, and serve him in truth with all your heart: for PO BOX 1146 consider how great things he hath done for you. 1 Sam Kidderminster 12v23+24 Howbeit Jesus suffered him not, but saith Worcs. unto him, Go home to thy friends, and tell them how DY10 1WG great things the Lord hath done for thee, and hath had ENGLAND. UK compassion on thee. And he departed, and began to ([email protected]) publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done www.timefortruth.co.uk for him: and all men did marvel. Mark 5v19+20 shop.timefortruth.co.uk Summing up 2017 Well it’s been a great year for producing & distributing Christian literature. We have sent out more tracts, Bibles, CDs & books than ever before. Our Christian Soldier’s Battle Notes book (first edition), sold out, & we have now had to reprint a second edition (expanded version). I am now working on volume two of the Christian Soldier’s Battle Notes. This will be purely dispensational & very doctrinal. So what else has TfT! been up to during 2017… (Not in any order) TfT! Gospel Calendar – Our best & most challenging yet! 10,000 Gospel calendars are out there as little missionaries in places where you & I can’t get to, preaching 24/7 on walls in homes & offices etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Law, Grace, and Liberty in Christ: a Study in Galatians
    CHARLES N. MILLER Law, Grace, and Liberty in Christ: A Study in Galatians 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Galatians Chapter 1: "Not, Neither, But" ....................................................................................................................... 7 Apostle By Jesus Christ: Galatians 1:1–5 .................................................................................................................. 9 A Perverted Gospel: Galatians 1:6–9 ....................................................................................................................... 11 By Revelation of Jesus Christ: Galatians 1:10–12 ............................................................................................... 13 Worthless Religion: Galatians 1:13–14 .................................................................................................................. 15 Basic Training: Galatians 1:15–19 ............................................................................................................................ 18 And They Glorified God In Me: Galatians 1:20–24 ............................................................................................. 21 Galatians Chapter 2: A Tale of Two Cities................................................................................................................... 23 A Meeting By Revelation:
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis and Evaluation of the Interpretations of J.C. O'hair, Cornelius Stam, and Charles Baker
    AN ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF THE INTERPRETATIONS OF J. C. O’HAIR, CORNELIUS STAM, AND CHARLES BAKER CONCERNING THE ORIGIN OF THE CHURCH, WATER BAPTISM, AND THE COMMISSION OF THE CHURCH A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Piedmont Baptist College and Graduate School Winston Salem, North Carolina In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Adam O. Christmas May 2011 Copyright © 2011 Adam Orlando Christmas All rights reserved. Piedmont Baptist College and Graduate School has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. APPROVAL SHEET AN ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF THE INTERPRETATIONS OF J. C. O’HAIR, CORNELIUS STAM, AND CHARLES BAKER CONCERNING THE ORIGIN OF THE CHURCH, WATER BAPTISM, AND THE COMMISSION OF THE CHURCH Adam Orlando Christmas ______________________________________________________ Dr. Larry Tyler, Committee Chair, Dean of the Graduate School ______________________________________________________ Dr. Barkev Trachian, Director of Graduate School ______________________________________________________ Dr. Hoyle Bowman, Distinguished Professor of Systematic Theology Date __________________________ To my wife, Kristin for supporting me through everything And to my children, Emily and Ethan for motivating me to succeed And to my parents, Jesse and Betty for instilling in me the will to persevere And to my family, by my blood and His for encouraging me in word and deed Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, for all that He has done for me. Without Him, I would never have had the ability or opportunity to make it through this academic process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apostle Paul Dispensationalism
    The Apostle Paul Dispensationalism PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:01:00 UTC Contents Articles Paul the Apostle 1 Hyperdispensationalism 19 E. W. Bullinger 23 John Nelson Darby 27 Dispensationalist theology 32 Dispensationalism 40 The Way International 50 American Christian Press 59 Victor Paul Wierwille 62 Way Productions 64 The Way College of Biblical Research – Indiana Campus 66 References Article Sources and Contributors 67 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 69 Article Licenses License 70 Paul the Apostle 1 Paul the Apostle Paul the Apostle Ananias of Damascus restores the sight of Saint Paul. A 1631 painting by Pietro Cortona. Apostle to the Gentiles [1] Born ca. AD 5 in Tarsus, present-day Turkey [Acts 22:3] [2] [2] Died ca. AD 67 in Rome Honored in All Christianity Major shrine Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls Feast January 25 (The Conversion of Paul) February 10 (Feast of Saint Paul's Shipwreck in Malta) June 29 (Feast of Saints Peter and Paul) November 18 (Feast of the dedication of the basilicas of Saints Peter and Paul) Attributes sword Patronage Missions; Theologians; Gentile Christians; Paul the Apostle, also called the Apostle Paul, Saul of Tarsus, and Saint Paul (c. AD 5 – c. AD 67),[2] was one of the most influential early Christian missionaries, with his writings forming a considerable portion of the New Testament. His influence on Christian thinking has been of utmost significance[3] due to his role as a prominent apostle of Christianity during the spreading of the Gospel through early Christian communities across the Roman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Protestant Biblical .' Interpretation
    PROTESTANT BIBLICAL .’ INTERPRETATION A Textbook of He-tics BY BERNARD RAMM THIRD REVISED EDITION BAKER BOOK HOUSE Grand Rapids, Michigan DEDICATION This volume is dedicated with Christian affec- tion to Dean Earl Kalland of the Conservative Baptist Seminary of Denver, Colorado; a Copyright, 1970, by friend, scholar, and Christian. Baker Book House Company 1’1 IOTOI .ITf HY (:USflING - MAI. OY, INC. ANN AftHOH, IJNfTF:I) S’I‘A’I’F‘S Ok AMF:ftfCA ACKNOWLEDGMENTS FOREWORD The author wishes to express his gratitude to the follow- Protestant Biblical Znterpretation has set no publishing ing publishing houses for permission to quote from their records since its first edition. But it has evidently served a publications: need in the Church of Jesus Christ and went into a second edition and now a third edition. Both the first and second James Nisbet & Co.: Types of Modern Theology, by H. R. editions have been translated into Japanese. Mackintosh. We have not made a total rewriting of the book but The Macmillan Company: The Bible in the Church (copyright, added new matters that have come up in hermeneutics such 1948), by R. W. Grant. as the New Hermeneutic, and we have more vigorously re- The Presbyterian Guardian: The Infallible Word. organized our basic theory by rewriting Chapters 3, 4, Charles Scribner’s Sons: Faith and History, by R. Niebuhr. and 5. E. P. Dutton & Co.: Apologia pro vita ma, by Newman. A student of hermeneutics of the present faces two very cumberson problems. First, the amount of literature, direct- ly or indirectly, hearing on all topicsof hermeneutics is beyond any one man’s ability to read it all.
    [Show full text]