Technology Square Atlanta, Georgia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Technology Square Atlanta, Georgia Technology Square Atlanta, Georgia Project Type: Mixed-Use/Multi-Use Case No: C035013 Year: 2005 SUMMARY Technology Square is a two-block-long complex of five four- to six-story buildings on eight acres (3.2 hectares) in the Midtown neighborhood of Atlanta developed by the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech). Although the structures maintain an outward focus on Midtown’s major streets (West Peachtree and Fifth streets, NW), the project also includes inner plazas and courtyards. The anchor tenant of the $180 million project is Georgia Tech’s College of Management, housed in a LEED-certified building. Also on site are continuing education facilities, a 250-room hotel, a 1,500-space parking garage, and 11 shops, including a campus bookstore managed by Barnes & Noble. Designed to look like a trolley, a shuttle runs along Fifth Street over 12 lanes of freeway, moving students to and from the main 450-acre (182.1-hectare) Georgia Tech campus. Technology Square is an example of university-sponsored development that has helped transform a run-down neighborhood into a vibrant district. FEATURES Mixed-Use Complex Trolley Infill Development Green Building Technology Square Atlanta, Georgia Project Type: Mixed Use/Multiuse Volume 35 Number 13 July–September 2005 Case Number: C035013 PROJECT TYPE Technology Square is a two-block-long complex of five four- to six-story buildings on eight acres (3.2 hectares) in the Midtown neighborhood of Atlanta developed by the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech). Although the structures maintain an outward focus on Midtown’s major streets (West Peachtree and Fifth streets, NW), the project also includes inner plazas and courtyards. The anchor tenant of the $180 million project is Georgia Tech’s College of Management, housed in a LEED-certified building. Also on site are continuing education facilities, a 250-room hotel, a 1,500-space parking garage, and 11 shops, including a campus bookstore managed by Barnes & Noble. Designed to look like a trolley, a shuttle runs along Fifth Street over 12 lanes of freeway, moving students to and from the main 450-acre (182.1-hectare) Georgia Tech campus. Technology Square is an example of university-sponsored development that has helped transform a run-down neighborhood into a vibrant district. LOCATION Central City SITE SIZE 8 acres/3.2 hectares LAND USES University, Downtown Hotel, Community Retail Center KEYWORDS/SPECIAL FEATURES Mixed-Use Complex Trolley Infill Development Green Building DEVELOPER Georgia Institute of Technology Division of Administration and Finance Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0325 404-894-3361 Fax: 404-894-1277 www.admin-fin.gatech.edu DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Jones Lang LaSalle 3500 Piedmont Road, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30305 404-995-6300 Fax: 404-995-2184 www.us.am.joneslanglasalle.com/en-US ARCHITECT Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates 1230 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30309 404-888-6600 Fax: 404-888-6700 www.tvsa.com GENERAL DESCRIPTION Technology Square is complex of five buildings on eight acres (3.2 hectares) in Midtown Atlanta developed by the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech). The anchor tenant of the $180 million project is the College of Management, housed in a LEED-certified building. Also on site are offices, continuing education facilities, a 250-room hotel, a plaza and quads, a 1,500-space parking garage, and retail businesses, including a campus bookstore managed by Barnes & Noble. These varied uses are spread among four- to six-story buildings that fuse traditional brick with modernist referents such as glass and steel. Wide sidewalks and double rows of trees line the perimeter. Designed to look like a trolley, a shuttle runs along Fifth Street, NW, over 12 lanes of freeway, moving students to and from the main 450-acre (182.1-hectare) Georgia Tech campus. Prior to the project’s completion in August 2003, most of the retail spaces in the square had been leased. When the fall semester started that year, hundreds of students and faculty plus alumni and businesspeople began to course through the square each day. From the outset, the hotel exceeded occupancy projections. Two years later, Technology Square has established itself as an example of a quickly completed, successful infill project—undertaken by a public developer. This achievement is largely the result of two converging visions: one for a university, the other for a neighborhood. THE SITE Encompassing two blocks, Technology Square is bounded by West Peachtree Street, NW, on the east and Interstate 75/Interstate 85 on the west, with Fifth and Fourth streets, NW, forming its north and south boundaries, respectively. The site lies immediately north of downtown in Midtown Atlanta. At the time when Georgia Tech began to assemble property for the project, residents of Atlanta often referred to Midtown as the city's armpit. Midtown residents felt the same way about the site, which included land that had sat vacant for five years and contained deserted buildings (previously a restaurant and Cadillac dealership) hosting prostitutes, vagrants, and drug dealers. The parcel did, however, have redeeming features. It was flat and offered good highway and subway access. The Biltmore Hotel, a city landmark, sat just across from it on West Peachtree Street. Running parallel to West Peachtree Street and just two blocks east of the site is the famous north-south corridor, Peachtree Street, as emblematic of Atlanta as the Braves. BACKGROUND AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS In 1978, with gunshots, sirens, and motorcycle engines setting the ambience of the neighborhood, area residents formed the Midtown Alliance. Initially focusing on grass-roots networking, the organization later expanded its goals to include beautification and cultural programming. In spite of these efforts, 66 percent of the neighborhood was vacant by 1996. If things were looking bad for Midtown, they were not looking much better across the interstate at Georgia Tech. The deteriorating campus was girded behind fences due to crime in adjacent neighborhoods. Moreover, a state audit had cited the administration for a number of irregularities. Out went the old president in 1995 and in came a new one, Wayne Clough from the University of Washington. From the start of his term, Clough was upfront about his vision for the school—putting Georgia Tech on the map as a major research university. And he realized that it would not happen without an upgrade to the surrounding community. To further these goals, he put Robert Thompson, a former colleague, in charge of a new administration and finance department. Soon thereafter, Thompson launched a master-planning processes, inviting the Midtown Alliance to participate. The nonprofit group in turn appointed him a board director. When Atlanta hosted the 1996 Summer Olympics, Georgia Tech served as the Olympic Village, housing 15,000 athletes. Afterward, the university had an extra 6,500 beds. These were filled without increasing enrollment so that, overnight, the campus became vastly more residential in nature. Suddenly, the need for safe streets (with entertainment, dining, and shopping options) became more urgent. The city of Atlanta had already demolished a dilapidated public housing project south of campus to improve conditions around Georgia Tech for the Olympics. Home Park, a residential neighborhood north of campus, was slowly renovating on its own; the administration abetted efforts by funding a daycare center. Pursuant to Georgia Tech’s master plan, Thompson shopped for bargains in an industrial tract west of campus. That left Midtown to the east, also viewed as an area for potential expansion. By that time, Susan Menheim, president of the Midtown Alliance, was conducting the visioning stage of an economic development initiative called “Blueprint Midtown.” At 50 varied settings ranging from corporate breakfasts to church suppers, the alliance asked area residents and stakeholders to visualize the neighborhood of their dreams. The consensus: people wanted lively streets—a smaller, southern version of midtown Manhattan. Thompson had his own convergent ideas but was holding his cards close. At a real estate conference, he had learned about a University of Pennsylvania project called “Sansom Common.” (Now named “University Square,” the project is a mixed-use district combining a university bookstore with hotel, conference, retail, and dining amenities.) Imagining an equivalent project, he hired the Philadelphia-based design firm of Wallace, Roberts & Todd to formulate a conceptual plan for the freeway tract. Meanwhile, the Atlanta office of Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL), a real estate consulting firm, executed a feasibility study. Two facts stood out: 1) the campus was severely under retailed, and 2) there was built-in demand for hotel/conference facilities. Because the regents of the University of Georgia system had made it clear they did not have the resources to finance Georgia Tech’s ambitious master plan, which called for the construction of one large new building each year for ten years, Thompson had already begun to court the Georgia Tech Foundation as an alternative funding source. Sitting on an endowment of roughly $300 million and with a capital campaign underway, the foundation seemed like a perfect solution to the administration’s financial predicament. There was, however, a small problem. Up until then, the foundation had focused on acquiring capital, preserving it, and using the interest generated to fund scholarships and professorships. Real estate entailed a huge conceptual stretch for the conservative institution. Thompson and Clough eventually persuaded the foundation to adopt their vision of Georgia Tech and assist with financial implementation. (The vision proved so compelling that the capital campaign raised $412 million more than originally targeted, with $180 million allocated for new buildings.) But later, when Thompson presented a specific request—Technology Square—the foundation again balked. Traditional academic buildings were one thing, but leveraging the endowment to finance the construction of a 250-room hotel/conference center off campus—in Midtown of all places—seemed like a very risky proposition.
Recommended publications
  • GRADUATE STUDY in CHEMISTRY Rice University Graduate Study At
    Graduate Study at The Department of Chemistry at Rice University provides a uniquely stimulating environ- GRADUATE STUDY ment for scientific research. In addition to the classical research areas of organic, inorganic, IN CHEMISTRY physical and theoretical chemistry, interdisciplinary research has long been a central focus at Rice University Rice. We have minimal barriers between departments, and work that spans science and engi- neering is particularly facile here. Most chemistry faculty members hold joint appointments with other departments, including bioengineering, biochemistry and cell biology, chemical engineering, electrical and computer engineering, physics and astronomy, computer science, and mechanical engineering and materials science. We have a close relationship with Baylor College of Medicine, and many of our labs address problems in bio-organic, bio-inorganic, bio-materials and bio-physical chemistry. The collaborative environment at Rice was critical to the development of nanotechnolgy, having facilitated the work of two of the first Nobel laureates in the area. Nanotechnology has blossomed into a major strength of the department, which houses one of only six National Science Foundation-funded centers for nanoscale sci- ence and engineering. Students are encouraged to visit the Department of Chemistry Web page for more detailed information about faculty research. Immersed in this environment of scientific discovery, the graduate program is designed to de- velop students’ ability to conduct independent, creative, scientific research and cultivate habits of inquiry that will ensure continued intellectual development throughout their careers. DEGREE REQUIREMENTS The degree requirements at Rice are designed to maximize the number and quality of doctoral Rice University students’ publications. Formal course requirements are unusually flexible: six one-semester Department of Chemistry courses in any relevant area of science or engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Kelechi Nmaobi Uzochukwu
    Kelechi N. Uzochukwu, PhD Assistant Professor www.kelechiuzo.webs.com | [email protected] | (410) 837-5061 U.S. Citizen EDUCATION 2014 PhD, Public Policy Atlanta, GA Georgia State University & Georgia Institute of Technology (Joint PhD Program) Specializations: Planning & Economic Development | Public & Nonprofit Management Dissertation: “Assessing the Prevalence, Participants, and Predictors of Coproduction: The Case of Atlanta, Georgia” – Advisor John Clayton Thomas 2007 MPA, Master of Public Administration Atlanta, GA Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University Specialization: Management & Finance 2004 BS, Civil & Environmental Engineering Greensboro, NC North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University Waste Management Certification RESEARCH & TEACHING INTERESTS . Urban/Community Planning . Politics & Policies . GIS Applications . Research Methods . Race/Gender/Class Issues . Public Participation . Policy Analysis . Program Evaluation PUBLICATIONS Uzochukwu, K. 2015. “Citizen Engagement in Community Development.” Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Partners Update (November/December 2015). Uzochukwu, K. 2014. “The Associations between Neighborhood Constructs and Physical Activity: Understanding Race & Income Disparities.” (revise & resubmit at Journal of Urban Affairs) 2014 Best Research Paper Award, Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts, Georgia Tech Uzochukwu, K. 2013. “Conjunction Junction, What’s Your Function? An Assessment of Coproduction in Atlanta, Georgia.” Public Administration Times. Hubsmith, D. and K. Uzochukwu. 2013. “Safe Routes to Schools.” In Encyclopedia of School Health (Vol. 1), eds. D.C. Wiley and A.C. Cory. Sage Publications, pp. 517-519. In Preparation Uzochukwu, K., Thomas, J.C. “Who Engages in the Co-production of Public Services and Why? The Case of Atlanta, Georgia” Uzochukwu, K. “Comparing the Effectiveness of Formal and Informal Coproduction in Engaging Underrepresented Groups in Public Service Delivery” Uzochukwu, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Making It LOUD
    Making it LOUD 2011 Annual Report WWW.USFIRST.ORG1 For over 20 years, FIRST® Founder Dean Kamen and everyone associated with FIRST have been on a mission to spread President Barack Obama, along with White House Technology Officer Aneesh Chopra, continued to feature FIRST teams as perfect examples of the president’s national White the word about the many educational, societal, economical, and House Science Fair initiative promoting STEM (science, technology, engineering, and Dean Kamen will.i.am planetary benefits of getting youth and adults alike involved in theFIRST math) education and celebrating science and math achievement in American schools. Morgan Freeman experience. Despite not having access to the millions of marketing Soledad O’Brien dollars required to make FIRST a household “brand,” the program has continued to grow each year at a blistering pace. …aND loudER Books, magazines, newspapers, cable TV, and the Web helped us create noise, too, with ongoing national coverage by Bloomberg, CNN, Popular Mechanics, In 2011, however, thanks to the fervent interest of major figures Popular Science, Wired, ESPN Magazine, WallStreetJournal.com, and more. Author Neal Bascomb brought the FIRST experience to life in his inspiring in government, the media, and mainstream entertainment, the book, The New Cool.Time Warner Cable incorporated “volume” of voices promoting FIRST... FIRST into its national “Connect A Million Minds™” initiative, featuring our FRC program in its TV show “It Ain’t Rocket Science.” The clamor of FIRST recognition continues to grow ...GOT TuRNED UP loud...VERY loud! louder every day. The continuing mainstream exposure is helping propel us toward our goal of making FIRST known and recognized around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariah M. Ramirez [email protected] College Station, TX
    Mariah M. Ramirez [email protected] College Station, TX. 77840 Citizenship: US Citizen Education Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. August 2017 – December 2022 Masters of Science in Nuclear Engineering Overall GPA: 3.88/4.00 Certificate from the Center for Nuclear Security Science & Policy Initiatives (NSSPI) Graduate Advisor: Dr. Sunil Chirayath & Dr. Charles M. Folden III The University of Texas (UT), Austin, TX. July 2013 – May 2017 Bachelor of Science in Physics Overall GPA: 3.43/4.00 Radiation Physics Option, six courses in Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Certificate in Forensic Science Research Experience Center for Nuclear Security Science and Policy Initiatives (NSSPI) June 2018 – Present Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Graduate Research Assistant Graduate Advisor: Dr. Sunil Chirayath, Director of NSSPI and Associate Professor Thesis Title: Safeguards Analysis for Neptunium-237 in High-Level Used Fuel Waste Through Computational and Radiochemical Methods • Conduct literary research and review on neptunium extraction and reprocessing work for safeguards • Analyze and quantify how much neptunium is produced from various reactor and fuel types • Conduct chemical separation processes to analyze separation methods for neptunium Undergraduate Research Assistant at the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL) University of Texas, Austin, TX. February 2016 – July 2017 Supervisor: Dr. Steven Biegalski, Former Director of NETL and Academic Program Professor Current Nuclear and Radiological Engineering and
    [Show full text]
  • Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University 1
    Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University 1 biomedical engineering. The program offers a unique means for U.S. and WALLACE H. COULTER Chinese students who want to learn and work in a global economy and in DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL global health settings. Minor ENGINEERING AT GEORGIA • Minor in Biomedical Engineering TECH AND EMORY Bachelor's Degree UNIVERSITY • Bachelor of Science in Biomedical Engineering Established in 1997 Master's Degree • Master of Biomedical Innovation and Development Biomedical engineering is a highly interdisciplinary field integrating • Master of Science in Robotics engineering and the life sciences to support the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of disease. The role of the biomedical engineer is to • Master of Biomedical Engineering (MS BMED) Program provide answers to problems arising from the study of living systems by employing the methodology and principles of engineering. Biomedical Doctoral Degree engineers often serve as integrators in multidisciplinary teams of • Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Bioengineering engineers, scientists, and healthcare professionals in the medical device • Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Bioinformatics and biotechnology industries as well as government regulatory agencies. • Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Biomedical Engineering Our program challenges students with practical, hands-on problem- solving and design experiences throughout the curriculum. Graduates of • Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Computational Science and our program have obtained the strong foundation necessary to address Engineering the complex healthcare challenges of the twenty-first century. • Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Machine Learning • Doctor of Philosophy with a Major in Robotics The Wallace H.
    [Show full text]
  • CLEAN WATER HEROES Georgia Tech TANYARD CREEK Georgia Tech Campus Captures Stormwater to Conserve Water and Protect Urban Stream
    Georgia’s 2017 CLEAN WATER HEROES Georgia Tech TANYARD CREEK Georgia Tech Campus Captures Stormwater to Conserve Water and Protect Urban Stream INTRODUCTION: When Chattahoochee Riverkeeper was looking for a way to show a group of intown Atlanta residents how to use green infrastructure to manage stormwater at a proposed neighborhood park, they had to look no further than the campus of the Georgia Institute of Technology. Georgia Tech has been a leader in green TANYARD infrastructure since it built its first LEED certified building in 2003. Since then, CREEK the Institute has taken on the challenge of managing the rain that falls on the campus. Now that rain is collected and conserved, and the campus has become a veritable zoo of green infrastructure projects that save water and keep pollution out of local streams. The campus’ green solutions to stormwater runoff are so numerous, faculty and students have even developed a smartphone app that allows anyone to take a virtual tour of Tech’s innovative approaches to managing stormwater. THE WATER BODY: In 1888, when Georgia Tech opened its doors, Tanyard Creek flowed through what was then undeveloped property west of Georgia Tech’s iconic Tech Tower building. When thunderstorms rattled over Tech students in those days, the rain hit the ground and seeped slowly into it and eventually to Tanyard Creek. Over the course of the next century as the Institute and Atlanta grew in unison, Tanyard was slowly piped and buried. Today, almost 70 percent of the land surrounding Tanyard Creek is covered in concrete, asphalt and buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • 06-07 WBB History
    History 31 SEASONS OF TRADITION 1. Georgia State has an all-time record of 444-408 (.521 winning percentage) over its 31-year history. The Lady Panthers have had 16 winning seasons, including the first six and eight of the last nine. 2. State’s first-ever women’s basketball game was in 1975, an 80-33 win at Georgia Tech. Georgia State would go on to finish with a 12-4 overall record (.750 winning percentage) during that inaugural season of 1975-76. 3. Terese Allen, who played for the Lady Panthers from 1977-81 and later came back as an assistant coach, is State’s all-time leading scorer with 2,074 points. Allen also holds the career records for scoring average (19.4 points per game) and field goals made (883). Her No. 34 is one of three former Georgia State women’s basketball jerseys to be retired. 4. Sheryl Martin, one of the three former State women’s basketball players to have her jersey retired (No. 24), pro- duced the top two single game scoring per- formances in the program’s history. Mar- tin scored 45 points in a game vs. Georgia Tech in 1983 before pouring in 52 against Stetson 11 days later. 5. Angela Gresham, a Georgia The retired jersey numbers of Terese Allen, Sheryl Martin and Evita Rogers State standout for four seasons during the 1980s, holds single game school records for rebounds and blocked shots. Gresham twice hauled down 24 boards in a game and also had seven blocked shots on two occasions.
    [Show full text]
  • Me07finalrevised.Pdf
    THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering 2006-2007 LETTER FROM talented and enthusiastic new faculty members, most of them at the assistant professor level. We lost some faculty to retirement, others to THE CHAIR resignations, and others were recruited to other institutions. Marc Levenston went to Stanford. Chris Lynch went to the University of This will be the last Annual Report California at Los Angeles. Bill King went to the University of Illinois. under my watch as chair of the Tom Kurfess went to Clemson. Dan Baldwin went to industry. So the Woodruff School of Mechanical new faculty not only replaced those who left, but allowed us to grow to Engineering. As most of you know, I help match our faculty size to our enrollment, which has continued to announced last November my grow. Based on enrollment, we still need additional faculty and hope to intention to retire at the end of May add them in the coming year. We also graduated a record number of 2007. In the spring, I was feted with bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral students. As you will see in the several very nice going away parties. statistics presented in this report, not only is enrollment up, but student Some of my former Ph.D. students quality continues to improve. We have a very talented group of under- came from across the country and graduate and graduate students. overseas to participate in the celebrations. I was humbled by the honors Another significant change was the loss of our long term presented to me.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 16/15 Virginia Tech Hokies Vs. Georgia Tech Postgame Notes Feb
    No. 16/15 Virginia Tech Hokies vs. Georgia Tech Postgame Notes Feb. 23, 2021 Cassell Coliseum | Blacksburg, Va. FINAL SCORE: Virginia Tech 53, Georgia Tech 69 RECORDS AND NOTABLES ● Virginia Tech falls to 14-5 overall and 8-4 in the ACC, while Georgia Tech improves to 12-8 overall and 8-6 in the league on the season. ● Mike Young is now 1-4 against Georgia Tech and Josh Pastner. ● UP NEXT: The Hokies will play to host Wake Forest (6-11, 3-11 ACC) on Saturday at noon inside Cassell Coliseum ​ on ACC Network. TEAM NOTES ● Virginia Tech went with the starting lineup of Nahiem Alleyne, Keve Aluma, Wabissa Bede, Justyn Mutts and Tyrece Radford for the 14th time this season, and the first since Jan 23. against Syracuse. ● KEY FIRST HALF RUN: Just above the 12-minute mark, the Hokies went on a five-point run to take a six- point ​ lead, the largest of the half. This run was contributed to by a jumper and free throw from Alleyne and another jumper from Bede. Georgia Tech answered with a six-point run to tie the game, the Hokies and Yellow Jackets went back and forth eventually tying the game for the fourth time to end the half 24-24 ● KEY SECOND HALF RUN: With just over seven minutes left in the game, the Hokies went on an eight-point run to ​ cut Georgia Tech’s lead to six. Mutts had a dunk and a 3 followed by a layup and a good free throw from Radford.
    [Show full text]
  • Stac.Pdf (6.097Mb)
    Postgraduate Education Ivan Allen College Because of STAC’s emphasis on research and writing, Literature, Communication, and Culture is one of six schools BACHELOR OFOF SCIENCESCIENCE ININ students are prepared to pursue advanced degrees. in the Ivan Allen College, which was established in 1990 as All STAC graduates complete a senior seminar or the liberal arts college of Georgia Tech. The others are SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, senior thesis, requirements that anticipate the work Economics; History, Technology, and Society; the Sam Nunn demanded of them in graduate school. Graduate School of International Affairs; Modern Languages; and programs in business, law, and medicine actively AND CULTURE Public Policy. recruit students with interdisciplinary training. Because STAC majors are interested in communication, Introspection STAC students have gone on to graduate programs science, and culture, many participate in campus in policy, law, journalism, medicine, education, and organizations, including: Atlanta Interaction literature at institutions including: Technique (Tech’s award-winning, student-run newspaper) A lively city with a population of more than 4 million, Boston University • Innovation Blueprint (yearbook staff) Atlanta offers many cultural and economic opportunities. Columbia University • DramaTech (the student-run theater) Georgia Tech’s 400-acre campus is located in the heart of University of California, Berkeley • Campus Life The STAC Society (a student-faculty group that the city, near the High Museum, the Carter Center, the King University of Chicago • organizes social events and professional development) Center, CNN, and Turner Field. Students are encouraged to University of Georgia Ivan Allen College Student Advisory Board supplement their academic education with the resources University of Tennessee • • Center for Study of Women, Science, and Technology (WST) available in this major urban center.
    [Show full text]
  • Tech Square Birth of an Innovation District
    Tech Square Birth of an Innovation District Chris Downing, P.E. Vice President Enterprise Innovation Institute Tech Square Today A uniform mix of economic, physical and networking assets Georgia Tech Square Tech Downtown Atlanta Georgia Tech Square Tech Tech Square TECH SQUARE TODAY • 1.4 million square feet of office, research, retail, and hotel space • Scheller Business School and GT Global Learning Center • 2014 Outstanding Research Park Award winner, Association of University Research Parks • 100+ technology startups and three accelerator programs • 20 Corporate Innovation Centers including Southern Company, Panasonic, and Home Depot BIRTH OF AN INNOVATION DISTRICT In 2000, the roughly 13-acre area now known as Tech Square and anchored by Spring and Fifth streets, was little more than a collection of surface lots. The Georgia Tech Foundation invested $180 million to create campus facilities and commercial space, and partnered with The University Financing Foundation, and Gateway Development Services to create the entrepreneurial and economic hub that is Tech Square. Tech Square An innovation district where new start-up ventures, large companies, and higher education collaborate to develop new technologies and impact economic development. Tech Square BREAKTHROUGH BREAKTHROUGH BREAKTHROUGH TALENT IDEAS COMPANIES Advanced Technology Development TechSquare Labs Center (ATDC) VentureLab Flashpoint Accelerator 100+ Technology Startup Companies The Garage 20 Corporate Innovation Centers, Georgia Tech Hotel and Conference including Anthem, Panasonic, Home Center Depot, AT&T Foundry, & Delta Air Lines Global Learning Center NCR Global Headquarters (under Georgia Tech Research Institute construction) Scheller College of Business Coda (under construction) Tech Square Research Building TECH SQUARE TIMELINE 1997 GT Foundation Purchases Land 2000 President Wayne Clough announces Technology Square project.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION, INC. Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2018 and 2017 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon) GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION, INC
    GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION, INC. Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2018 and 2017 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon) GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION, INC. Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Auditors’ Report 1 Consolidated Financial Statements: Consolidated Statements of Financial Position 2 Consolidated Statements of Activities 3 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 4 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 5–37 KPMG LLP Suite 2000 303 Peachtree Street, N.E. Atlanta, GA 30308-3210 Independent Auditors’ Report The Board of Trustees Georgia Tech Foundation, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Georgia Tech Foundation, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of activities and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements. Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditors’ Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
    [Show full text]