MOBILITY SERVICES a STATISTA DOSSIER PLUS on MOBILITY SERVICES for PASSENGERS Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MOBILITY SERVICES a STATISTA DOSSIER PLUS on MOBILITY SERVICES for PASSENGERS Table of Contents MOBILITY SERVICES A STATISTA DOSSIER PLUS ON MOBILITY SERVICES FOR PASSENGERS Table of contents Terminology Competitive landscape ▪ Car-sharing ▪ Investments ▪ Ride-hailing ▪ Financial figures ▪ Transportation networks ▪ Implications Supply- and demand-side factors Market potential and outlook ▪ Vehicle miles traveled by mode ▪ Market size ▪ Impact on light vehicle sales ▪ Emerging markets ▪ Related costs ▪ Market outlook 2 Executive Summary The 2019 zeitgeist is revolving around the primacy of use over EBITDA of -1.8 billion U.S. dollars and -0.9 billion U.S. dollars ownership. There appears to be an underlying assumption that respectively (chapter 3), both companies have yet to prove their today's passengers have a desire to reach their destination fast, business models’ worth. Ultimately, TNCs will seek ways to take at low cost, and in a manner that is environmentally sustainable. the human driver out of the equation (chapter 2). The advent of As a result, Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) business models have autonomous vehicles is projected to transform mobility business begun to conquer the industry. The conventional taxi market is at models and make them more financially sustainable. risk of going extinct due to the emergence of ride-hailing Since they are home to offices, stores, and cultural venues, programs. Concurrently, the car rental market is facing stiff urban areas are forecast to spearhead the trend towards a new competition from innovative car-sharing companies. The breed of passenger vehicles that are autonomous, electric, combined market for ride-hailing, ride-sharing, car-sharing, and connected, and shared. It is projected that urban passenger smart parking is expected to exceed 400 million U.S. dollars by mobility demand will almost double from just under 26 trillion 2025 (chapter 4). passenger kilometers to almost 50 trillion in 2050 (chapter 2). In light of arising business opportunities, the number of startups Not only are travelers expected to become more mobile overall in the field continues to grow, and prices are unlikely to increase and expand the amount of vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) per in a highly competitive environment. It remains to be seen how person, but they are also projected to switch from more traditional many of the startups that have entered the scene will eventually transport modes, such as public transportation or private cars, to be financially sustainable. As of now, there is only a handful of shared mobility. If the industry continues to increase its focus on transportation network companies (TNCs) that are publicly electric drives, the use of car-sharing and ride-sharing vehicles traded, the most prominent ones being Uber and Lyft. With 2018 has the potential to drive down carbon dioxide emissions. 3 01 Terminology ▪ Car-sharing ▪ Ride-sharing ▪ Transportation networks The Mobility-as-a-Service terminology The Mobility-as-a-Service market connects regulators, ▪ Car-sharing programs enable motorists to borrow cars for a infrastructure providers, transport providers, platform short period of time and at low cost. Car-sharing is different providers, and IT service providers to customers. The latter from renting inasmuch as car rental customers keep demand a large number of vehicles they can summon or vehicles for a longer time period, and there is also typically a borrow, e.g. via apps provided by transportation network designated drop-off zone for rental cars. companies (TNCs). ▪ Ride-sharing: Vehicle owners and riders use personal If commuters and travelers changed their travel behavior and vehicles to share their trips. ditched their private cars in favor of sharing, this could ultimately lead to higher vehicle capacity utilization levels and ▪ Ride-hailing programs enable their users to summon a fewer automobile sales. A trend towards declining vehicle vehicle driven by a designated driver. sales growth rates can already be witnessed in several mature markets: North America and Western Europe expect to see ▪ Transportation network companies use technology to plateauing light vehicle sales in 2019 (chapter 2). connect passengers and vehicles. In this report, the terms car-sharing, ride-hailing, and ride- sharing will be used as follows: 5 Car-sharing providers and car rental Car-sharing: Tokyo and Moscow among leading cities companies serve people who require a vehicle temporarily. Car-sharing markets based on vehicles in fleet in 2018 Usually, car rental customers keep said Fleet size in thousands of vehicles in 2018 vehicle for longer time periods and return it 0 5 10 15 20 25 at designated zones, while shared cars are available for brief periods of time and at a Tokyo 19.8 cost that is economically viable for short journeys. Car-sharing programs enable motorists to rent cars either from a company (free-floating) or from private automobile Moscow 16.5 owners (peer-to-peer or P2P). Depending on the program, free-floating car-sharing customers may borrow and return vehicles either at designated pick-up and drop-off Beijing 15.4 zones or wherever it is convenient. P2 car- sharing is different insomuch as it enables automobile owners to rent their personal Shanghai 13.9 vehicles to peers. The top cities for car-sharing were mostly located in Asia in 2018, and no U.S. city Guangzhou 4.2 made the cut. Car-sharing programs in the United States have yet to gain the same popularity as rental cars or taxis. Note: Worldwide Source(s): Bloomberg; Government of Moscow; Frost & Sullivan 6 Russia’s car-sharing market grew by a factor of 2.5 Car-sharing market revenue in Russia between 2017 and 2018 14 13 Russia’s capital was the second biggest car-sharing market in 2018 with 16.5 12 million shared vehicles. According to PwC, car-sharing was available in 14 Russian cities as of August 2018, 10 including Moscow, Sochi, Saint Petersburg, and Krasnodar. 8 Many Russians, especially Moscovites, are turning to car-sharing and ride- hailing services in an effort to mitigate 6 5.1 the growing costs of car ownership and Revenue in billion Russian rublesbillionRussianinRevenue maintenance they face. +7.9 bn ₽ 4 =2.5x growth High costs in combination with a lack of infrastructure and affordable parking in 2 Russia’s cities seem to have translated into a rapid growth of the Russian car- sharing market. 0 2017 2018 Note: Russia 7 Source(s): TIARCENTER Car-sharing more popular among the young More than one third of under 30-year-old drivers were registered with at least one car-sharing program in 2018 Licensees worldwide who were registered with at least one car-sharing program in 2018 80% 74.8% Notwithstanding the fact that only about one third of under 30-year-old holders 70% 66.2% of driving licenses were registered users of at least one car-sharing 60% program in 2018, the younger generation seems to be the cohort that 50% is most receptive to sharing over owning. Under 30s All age groups 40% 30% 19.4% 20% 15.7% 10.8% 10% 7.4% 2.6% 0.5% 1.1% 1.6% 0% None Four programs Three programs Two programs One program Note: Worldwide Source(s): Arthur D. Little 8 Ride-hailing: Asia leads the market Contrary to car-sharing, members of ride-sharing programs keep out of the Global revenue comparison - ride-hailing market as of 2019 driver’s seat, unless they themselves own the vehicle and offer rides to others, which would make them members of peer-to-peer ride-sharing (P2P ride-sharing). P2P ride-sharing (or East Asia carpooling) enables vehicle owners and 56,813 riders to share personal vehicles. million U.S. dollars Ride-hailing programs enable their users to summon a vehicle driven by a designated driver. The ride-hailing market is very similar to the traditional taxi market, but connects passengers and drivers via technology, and sometimes lacks the type of regulation North America that typically puts a cap on the number 52,877 of vehicles in taxi fleets. Technology has million U.S. dollars South Asia given rise to the term e-hailing. 30,744 million Eastern Asia is expected to remain the U.S. dollars largest market globally. The Statista Mobility Market Outlook estimates that this market will grow from 56.8 billion to 105 billion U.S. dollars and serve some 45,000 50,000 55,000 700 million customers in 2023. Note: Worldwide Source(s): Statista Mobility Market Outlook 9 Singapore’s ride-hailing penetration rate among the highest worldwide Projected penetration rate in Singapore’s ride-hailing market between 2017 and 2023 45% Singapore has a population density of Penetration rate about 20,000 people per square mile. 40% 42.7% 41.2% Road taxes, parking fees, and vehicle 39.4% entry permit fees were introduced to 35% 37.0% mitigate congestion and air pollution. 34.2% As a result, the country’s ride-hailing 30% 30.8% penetration rate is expected to grow to almost 43 percent by 2023. 25% 27.2% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Note: Singapore Source(s): Statista Mobility Market Outlook 10 Ride-hailing companies continue to gain market share Trips per day taken in New York City with selected taxi/ridesharing services throughout April 2019 Yellow Cab Uber Lyft 600,000 521,912 Taxi operators serve people who need a ride but do not necessarily want to use car- 500,000 sharing because they either feel uncomfortable driving in an 376,509 unfamiliar environment or do 400,000 398,437 not hold a driver’s license. 347,726 Ride-hailing operators have 300,000 308,129 already begun to eat into the 249,579 taxi market. At approximately 28 264,822 billion U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Emerging Mobility Technologies and Trends
    Emerging Mobility Technologies and Trends And Their Role in Creating “Mobility-As-A-System” For the 21st Century and Beyond OWNERSHIP RIGHTS All reports are owned by Energy Systems Network (ESN) and protected by United States copyright and international copyright/intellectual property laws under applicable treaties and/or conventions. User agrees not to export any report into a country that does not have copyright/ intellectual property laws that will protect ESN’s rights therein. GRANT OF LICENSE RIGHTS ESN hereby grants user a non-exclusive, non-refundable, non- transferable Enterprise License, which allows you to (i) distribute the report within your organization across multiple locations to its representatives, employees or agents who are authorized by the organization to view the report in support of the organization’s internal business purposes; and (ii) display the report within your organization’s privately hosted internal intranet in support of your organization’s internal business purposes. Your right to distribute the report under an Enterprise License allows distribution among multiple locations or facilities to Authorized Users within your organization. ESN retains exclusive and sole ownership of this report. User agrees not to permit any unauthorized use, reproduction, distribution, publication or electronic transmission of any report or the information/forecasts therein without the express written permission of ESN. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY AND LIABILITY ESN has used its best efforts in collecting and preparing each report. ESN, its employees, affi liates, agents, and licensors do not warrant the accuracy, completeness, correctness, non-infringement, merchantability, or fi tness for a particular purpose of any reports covered by this agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • EN160706 BMW Group and Sixt SE Extend Car Sharing Programme
    Corporate Communications Media Information 6 July 2016 BMW Group and Sixt SE extend car sharing programme Brussels becomes 10th DriveNow city in Europe Five years of premium car sharing More than 600,000 customers Car sharing most important driving force of electric mobility More than three million electric kilometres since 2013 Consistent implementation of strategy NUMBER ONE > NEXT Munich - Brussels. As it celebrates its fifth anniversary, DriveNow is extending its service to Brussels. The Belgian capital is the tenth European city where the premium car sharing joint venture from BMW Group and Sixt SE will operate. Car sharing without a branch office has been allowed in Brussels since June and the service will offer a range of BMW and MINI models on the proven free-floating car sharing concept. Speaking on the occasion of DriveNow’s fifth anniversary, Peter Schwarzenbauer, BMW AG management board member responsible for MINI, BMW Motorrad, Rolls- Royce, Aftersales and Mobility Services said, “We are delighted to welcome Brussels as the tenth DriveNow city, a fitting way to celebrate five years of premium car sharing in Europe. In terms of customers, we already lead the car-sharing market in Germany and our aim is to achieve that across Europe. We are convinced that our premium individual mobility services will be a key factor for success in the future. Of course services will not replace the automotive sector, but they are an important additional area for our business. That’s why we are constantly looking at where we can take DriveNow next.” Following its launch in Munich in June 2011, DriveNow has constantly expanded its mobility services in Europe and now has more than 600,000 customers.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Shaping the Mobility of the Future, Annual Report 2017
    WE ARE SHAPING THE MOBILITY OF THE FUTURE ANNUAL REPORT 2017 The new era of electric mobility requires visionaries and people of action. Find out in our image brochure how BMW Group is shaping the mobility of the future. CONTENTS 1 4 TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS CORPORATE Page 4 BMW Group in Figures GOVERNANCE Page 8 Report of the Supervisory Board Page 198 Statement on Corporate Governance Page 18 Statement of the Chairman of the (Part of the Combined Management Report) Board of Management Page 198 Information on the Company’s Governing Constitution Page 199 Declaration of the Board of Management and of the Page 24 BMW Stock and Capital Markets in 2017 Supervisory Board pursuant to § 161 AktG Page 200 Members of the Board of Management Page 201 Members of the Supervisory Board Page 204 Composition and Work Procedures of the Board of 2 Management of BMW AG and its Committees Page 206 Composition and Work Procedures of the COMBINED Super visory Board of BMW AG and its Committees Page 213 Disclosures pursuant to the Act on Equal MANAGEMENT REPORT Gender Participation Page 214 Information on Corporate Governance Practices Applied Page 30 General Information and Group Profile beyond Mandatory Requirements Page 30 Organisation and Business Model Page 216 Compliance in the BMW Group Page 40 Management System Page 221 Compensation Report Page 44 Report on Economic Position (Part of the Combined Management Report) Page 44 General and Sector-specific Environment Page 239 Responsibility Statement by the Page 48 Overall Assessment by Management Company’s
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility Ecosystems Striving Towards a Seamless Interface for Customers
    May 2019 Digital Ecosystems Series Mobility ecosystems striving towards a seamless interface for customers 01 Executive summary 03 Trends reshaping the mobility landscape 08 New mobility business models are emerging 18 Contrasting perspectives on value within mobility ecosystems 25 Building blocks for integrated mobility 28 Implications for re/insurers 44 Conclusion The rapid growth of megacities and conurbations means that societies will need evermore sustainable and resilient mobility solutions to fulfil their potential. Evangelos Avramakis, Head Digital Ecosystems R&D Executive summary Mobility has been at the heart of insurance since merchants pooled their maritime risks in the 14th century. The automobile was the strongest growth engine for insurance in the 20th century, but mobility in the 21st could look very different. Urbanisation, changing demographics and greater environmental consciousness are putting pressure on existing mobility infrastructure. As the world looks for more sustainable means of moving goods and people, we all need to make better and more dynamic use of existing systems, as well as experiment with newer tech-enabled mobility platforms. Executive summary New mobility business models are Highly networked, data-driven mobility business models are emerging, led by a emerging and transforming the way variety of industry participants working closely with technology players. Automakers people and goods get around. have launched mobility services to remain relevant, and a new class of mobility companies are connecting multiple networks through GPS-enabled smart phones. The most advanced companies are simplifying the entire customer journey and have integrated payments across all modes of transportation. Insurers have key roles to play in de-risking Insurers have key roles to play within these new data-centric mobility models.
    [Show full text]
  • Momentum the Volkswagen Group Magazine
    momentum The Volkswagen Group magazine NEW BEGINNING A journey into the mobile future momentum New beginning – Journey into the mobile future 3 The Volkswagen Group is transforming itself from one of the largest car manufacturers into a globally leading provider of sustainable mobility. This metamorphosis is already visible in many areas today: new powertrains, strong partnerships for new forms of mobility, and new digital products and services. This issue of momentum brings you stories about people who have set out to drive this change. The journey into the mobile future has begun. 4 Destinations momentum This issue of momentum takes you to places where the Volkswagen Group is working on the future of mobility. The people our authors and photographers met reflect the many answers to one simple question: how will we move in tomorrow’s world? Hong Kong, Midlands, China ― 26 UK ― 32 London, UK ― 42 Mladá Boleslav, Czech Republic ― 80 Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen, Germany ― 70 Sant’Agata Bolognese, Italy ― 78 Bologna, Italy ― 82 Wolfsburg, Germany ― 86 Potsdam, Germany ― 14 Berlin, Germany ― 8, 76 momentum Destinations 5 Södertälje, Barcelona, Sweden Spain ― 48 ― 64 Molsheim, Reykjavík, France ― 52 Munich, Iceland ― 22 Germany ― 84 Bremen, Las Vegas, Germany ― 66 USA ― 38 Oslo, Norway ― 58 6 Contents momentum A question of values ― 8 New demands on mobility On tour with the Crafter ― 22 Anna María Karlsdóttir: through Iceland with the Crafter AILA and me ― 66 Robot lady AILA: real-life machine Symbiosis ― 52 Etienne Salomé, Bugatti: symbiosis between
    [Show full text]
  • On-Street Car Sharing Pilot Program Evaluation Report
    On-Street Car Sharing Pilot Evaluation On-Street Car Sharing Pilot Program Evaluation Report JANUARY 2017 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY | SUSTAINABLE STREETS DIVISION | PARKING 1 On-Street Car Sharing Pilot Evaluation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GOAL: “MAKE TRANSIT, WALKING, BICYCLING, TAXI, RIDE SHARING AND CARSHARING THE PREFERRED MEANS OF TRAVEL.” (SFMTA STRATEGIC PLAN) As part of SFpark and the San Francisco Findings Municipal Transportation Agency’s (SFMTA) effort to better manage parking demand, • On-street car share vehicles were in use an the SFMTA conducted a pilot of twelve on- average of six hours per day street car share spaces (pods) in 2011-2012. • 80% of vehicles were shared by at least ten The SFMTA then carried out a large-scale unique users pilot to test the use of on-street parking • An average of 19 unique users shared each spaces as pods for shared vehicles. The vehicle monthly On-Street Car Share Parking Permit Pilot (Pilot) was approved by the SFMTA’s Board • 17% of car share members reported selling of Directors in July 2013 and has been or donating a car due to car sharing operational since April 2014. This report presents an evaluation of the Pilot. Placing car share spaces on-street increases shared vehicle access, Data from participating car share convenience, and visibility. We estimate organizations show that the Pilot pods that car sharing as a whole has eliminated performed well, increased awareness of thousands of vehicles from San Francisco car sharing overall, and suggest demand streets. The Pilot showed promise as a tool for on-street spaces in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • 20-03 Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area
    Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report | Report Number 20-03 | February 2020 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Mission Statement: Advance innovative energy solutions in ways that improve New York’s economy and environment. Vision Statement: Serve as a catalyst – advancing energy innovation, technology, and investment; transforming New York’s economy; and empowering people to choose clean and efficient energy as part of their everyday lives. Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority New York, NY Robyn Marquis, PhD Project Manager, Clean Transportation Prepared by: WXY Architecture + Urban Design New York, NY Adam Lubinsky, PhD, AICP Managing Principal Amina Hassen Associate Raphael Laude Urban Planner with Barretto Bay Strategies New York, NY Paul Lipson Principal Luis Torres Senior Consultant and Empire Clean Cities NYSERDA Report 20-03 NYSERDA Contract 114627 February 2020 Notice This report was prepared by WXY Architecture + Urban Design, Barretto Bay Strategies, and Empire Clean Cities in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter the "Sponsors"). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Sponsors or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, the Sponsors, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Transportation Network Companies Policy Guide
    POLICY GUIDE Regulation of Transportation Network Companies January 2019 “Helping Communities and Organizations Create Their Best Futures” Founded in 1988, we are an interdisciplinary strategy and analysis firm 2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1000 providing integrated, creative and analytically rigorous approaches to Seattle, Washington 98121 complex policy and planning decisions. Our team of strategic planners, policy P (206) 324-8760 and financial analysts, economists, cartographers, information designers and www.berkconsulting.com facilitators work together to bring new ideas, clarity, and robust frameworks to the development of analytically-based and action-oriented plans. BERK Consulting Subconsultants Allegra Calder Robert Feldstein Kristin Maidt April Rinne Sherrie Hsu Emily Walton Percival Ben Silver Regulation of Transportation Network Companies: Policy Guide Washington State Joint Transportation Committee |January 2019 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Background ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 State TNC Laws ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Regulatory Authority ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quickar(PDF 8.49
    7 September 2017 The Secretary, Economy and Infrastructure Committee Parliament House, Spring Street EAST MELBOURNE VIC 3002 Dear Secretary, Please accept this cover letter and attached report as a submission to the Committee’s Inquiry into Electric Vehicles. A mushrooming of Melbourne’s population over the next 20 years combined with the phenomena of significant population detachment from economic hubs driven by growing rates of car ownership and burgeoning investment by government in private car driver-driven infrastructure is a looming urban mobility crisis. We risk sleepwalking into a situation where our once “world’s most livable city” has insufficient public transport, overloaded infrastructures, a default logarithmic expansion of motorised means of transport, a vast rise in air and noise pollution and CO2 emissions, a concomitant parking capacity problem and increasing disparity in the social equity standards between communities of very near proximity. What should the Victorian Government do? The attached report assesses the opportunity for Free Floating Car Sharing in Zero Emission urban transport. This report concludes that Free Floating Car Sharing is an innovative technology with a smart operating model that improves cities. It offers cities a no-cost, scaleable transport alternative to supplement existing transport systems and reduce inner urban vehicle congestion. Moreover, Free Floating Car Sharing offers Melbourne’s best opportunity for a definitive, practical and evolutionary pathway into a sustainable Zero Emission urban mobility future through the accelerated uptake of Electric Vehicles. Quickar Pty Ltd (ABN 99 611 879 513) Melbourne, 3000 Victoria, Australia Page 1 of 66 In light of these conclusions, the Victorian Government should: • Enable Free Floating Car Sharing.
    [Show full text]
  • How Uber Won the Rideshare Wars and What Comes Next
    2/18/2020 How Uber Won The Rideshare Wars and What Comes Next CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE | HOW UBER WON THE RIDESHARE WARS AND WHAT COMES NEXT How Uber Won The Rideshare Wars and What Comes Next How Uber won the first phase of the rideshare war and how cabs, competitors, and car companies are battling back. BY ELYSE DUPRE — AUGUST 29, 2016 VIEW GALLERY https://www.dmnews.com/customer-experience/article/13035536/how-uber-won-the-rideshare-wars-and-what-comes-next 1/18 2/18/2020 How Uber Won The Rideshare Wars and What Comes Next View Gallery In 2011, two University of Michigan alums Adrian Fortino and Jahan Khanna partnered with venture capitalist Sunil Paul to revolutionize how people got from point A to point B quickly without having to do much. The company was Sidecar, and the idea was simple: “We're going to replace your car with your iPhone,” Fortino explains. Sidecar did not lack competition. Around this time, the taxi industry was experimenting with new ways to make it easier for individuals to summon cars. And entrepreneurs, frustrated with wait times, imagined new ways to hire someone to drive them around. Multiple companies formed to solve this need, including one that is now considered a global powerhouse: Uber. By the time Sidecar went into beta testing in February 2012, Uber, or UberCab as it was originally known when it was founded in 2009, had raised at least $37.5 million at a $330 million post-money valuation, according to VentureBeat. Lyft followed shortly after when it went into beta in mid 2012, boasting more than $7 million in funding, according to TechCrunch's figures.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestones in Future Mobility, Annual Report 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 #Milestones in Future Mobility ANNUAL 2018 ANNUAL REPORT We are inventing the mobility of the future, in which we think and work in new ways. We invite you to learn more about how we see the future today. CONTENTS 1 4 TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS CORPORATE Page 4 BMW Group in Figures GOVERNANCE Page 8 Report of the Supervisory Board Page 200 Statement on Corporate Governance Page 16 Statement of the Chairman of the (Part of the Combined Management Report) Board of Management Page 200 Information on the Company’s Governing Constitution Page 201 Declaration of the Board of Management and of the Page 20 BMW AG Stock and Capital Markets in 2018 Supervisory Board Pursuant to § 161 AktG Page 202 Members of the Board of Management Page 203 Members of the Supervisory Board Page 206 Composition and Work Procedures of the Board of 2 Management of BMW AG and its Committees Page 208 Composition and Work Procedures of the COMBINED Super visory Board of BMW AG and its Committees Page 215 Disclosures Pursuant to the Act on Equal MANAGEMENT REPORT Gender Participation Page 216 Information on Corporate Governance Practices Applied Page 26 General Information and Group Profile beyond Mandatory Requirements Page 26 Organisation and Business Model Page 218 Compliance in the BMW Group Page 36 Management System Page 223 Compensation Report Page 40 Report on Economic Position (Part of the Combined Management Report) Page 40 General and Sector-specific Environment Page 239 Responsibility Statement by the Page 44 Overall Assessment by Management Company’s
    [Show full text]
  • New Mobility Playbook
    Seattle Department of Transportation NEW MOBILITY PLAYBOOK Version 1.0 September 2017 MORE MOBILITY MORE INFORMATION MORE SEATTLE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SDOT PROJECT TEAM INTERAGENCY PROJECT Evan Corey | Project Lead TEAM Andrew Glass Hastings | Division Director, Carol Cooper and Jean Paul Velez | Transit and Mobility King County Metro Tracy Krawczyk | Division Director, Policy Kara Main-Hester | Seattle Department of and Planning Finance and Administrative Services Benjamin de la Peña | Deputy Director for Policy, Sean Bouffiou | King County Records and Planning, Mobility and Right of Way Licensing Services Mayumi Thompson | Communications Mafara Hobson | Communications Director CONSULTANT SUPPORT Scott Kubly | Department of Transportation Joe Iacobucci and Ellen Gottschling | Director Sam Schwartz Engineering Leslie Carlson, Mike Westling, Heidi Nielsen, CITY OF SEATTLE and Erin Halasz | Brink Communications INTERDEPARTMENTAL TEAM Cristina Van Valkenburgh, Mike Estey, EXPERT REVIEWERS Mary Catherine Snyder, Candida Lorenzana, Mollie Pellon and Corinne Kisner | NACTO Ben Smith, Naomi Doerner, and Kyle Rowe | Russell Brooks and Rob Benner | SDOT Transit and Mobility Division Transportation for America Jonathan Lewis | SDOT Policy and Planning Greg Lindsay | New Cities Foundation Division Katja Schechtner | OECD/MIT Media Lab Mark Bandy and Adiam Emery | Stonly Baptiste | Urban.Us SDOT Transportation Operations Division Gabe Klein | CityFi Darby Watson | SDOT Project Development Division Kevin O’Neill | SDOT Street Use Division Michael Mattmiller
    [Show full text]