Stage Three Pre-Application Consultation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stage Three Pre-Application Consultation The Sizewell C Project Consultation Report 5.1 Appendix E.3 Part E: Stage Three Pre-Application Consultation Revision: 1.0 Applicable Regulation: Regulation 5(2)(q) PINS Reference Number: EN010012 May 2020 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 SIZEWELL C PROJECT – CONSULTATION REPORT NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Appendix E.3 Stage 3 Pre-Application Consultation Document: Volume 2B – Preliminary Environmental Information (January 2019) NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Consultation Report | 4 2B Volume 2B Preliminary Environmental Information Contents 7. Two Village Bypass PEI 8. Northern Park and Ride PEI 9. Southern Park and Ride PEI 10. Freight Management Facility PEI 11. Yoxford Roundabout PEI 12. Highway Improvements PEI 13. Project Wide Cumulative PEI 14. Related Assessments and Approaches References Abbreviations Key Terms Volume 2B Preliminary Environmental Information 7. Two Village Bypass PEI 7.1. Introduction to PEI 7.1.4. The two village bypass would be open to public use alongside construction traffic associated with the project. 7.1.1. The route of the two village bypass would bypass the After completion of the power station, it would be retained villages of Farnham and Stratford St Andrew with a new as a lasting legacy of the project. There would be no single carriageway road to the south (see Volume 1 Figure decommissioning or ‘removal and reinstatement’ phase. 2.12). Once operational, the bypass would form a new section of the A12. 7.1.5. The preferred proposals are likely to have some effects on the environment during construction and 7.1.2. The proposed route runs approximately 2.4 operation. The likely significant adverse and beneficial kilometres (km) across predominantly agricultural land to the effects for the construction and operational phases are south of the existing A12, departing the A12 to the west of explained below. The scope of the preliminary assessment Stratford St Andrew via a new three arm roundabout near includes landscape and visual, terrestrial ecology and Parkgate Farm. It would bend south around Nuttery Belt ornithology, amenity and recreation, geology and soils, and continue around Pond Wood and Foxburrow Wood, land quality and agriculture, terrestrial historic environment, then continue north crossing local roads and a couple of noise and vibration, air quality, groundwater, surface water, Public Rights of Way (PRoWs), before re-joining the A12 flood risk, and traffic and transport and no topics have with a second roundabout to the east of Farnham at the been ‘scoped out’ of the assessment. The chapter concludes A12/A1094 Friday Street junction. The scheme proposed is with a short comparison between the road-led and rail-led described in further detail in Volume 1, Chapter 12. strategies as relevant to the two village bypass. 7.1.3. The road would be 7.3 metres (m) wide with 1m 7.1.6. This chapter presents each of the topics relevant hardstrips, 2.5m wide verges, earthworks where needed to the site in turn, under the following sub-headings: and a 5m berm. EDF Energy is consulting on a wider area (a) Baseline Environment, (b) Environmental Design and during this Stage 3 consultation including the buffer zone Embedded Mitigation, (c) Preliminary Assessment of Effects, shown on Volume 1, Figure 2.12, as the design and (d) Additional Mitigation and Monitoring, (e) Preliminary landscaping mitigation has yet to be fully finalised, and Assessment of Residual Effects and (f) Completing the in particular EDF Energy would wish to engage with land Assessment. owners in relation to works which might accommodate the access works for their retained land. Stage 3 - Volume 2 Preliminary Environmental Information | 375 Chapter 7 | Two Village Bypass PEI 7.2. Landscape and visual • Late enclosure with a pattern of tree belts and straight hedges; 7.2.1. The figure for landscape and visual is presented in • Landscape parklands; Volume 3 as Figure 7.2.1. • A focus of settlement in the Estate Sandlands landscape; a) Baseline environment • 19thC red brick buildings with black glazed pantiles in the 7.2.2. The proposed bypass route would be approximately east; 2.4km long and cover an area of approximately 61.1 hectares (ha). It would slope down from its western end • Lark valley buildings are frequently of brick or flint with where it would leave the A12 at a new roundabout, to a low tiled or slate roofs; point in the Alde valley. It would cross the River Alde on a • Tree belts and plantations throughout; bridge, before beginning to cut into the landscape and rising to a high point south-east of Farnham Hall. At the eastern • Occasional and significant semi-natural woodlands and end of the route, the bypass would tie back into the A12 at ribbons of wet woodland; and another new roundabout. • Complex and intimate landscape on valley sides”. 7.2.3. The land use within the study area is predominantly arable farmland, with well-defined hedgerow field 7.2.7. The valley of the River Alde, as shown on Figure boundaries and interspersed with scattered woodlands 7.2.1, is characterised as the ‘valley meadowlands’ landscape and copses. However, the valley of the River Alde is character type. The key characteristics are described in the predominantly pastoral with less hedgerows and more Landscape Character Assessment as: drainage ditches as field boundaries. The route would be largely at grade, within shallow cuttings or on low • “Flat landscapes of alluvium or peat on valley floors; embankments, except for the elevated section over the valley of the River Alde. • Grassland divided by a network of wet ditches; 7.2.4. The proposed bypass would cross predominately arable • Occasional Carr woodland and plantations of poplar; fields, with some pasture in the Alde valley, cutting across • Occasional small reedbeds; existing hedgerow field boundaries, local roads and public footpaths. There are also some areas of existing woodland • Unsettled; within the red line boundary for the proposed route. • Cattle grazed fields; and 7.2.5. At a national level, the site and much of the study • Fields converted to arable production”. area are situated within National Character Area 82 (NCA82): South Coast and Heaths (Ref. 7.2.1). NCA82 comprises low-lying gently undulating farmland with areas 7.2.8. A small section of the site to the west, shown on of woodland, heath and forest plantation. The valley of the Figure 7.2.1, can be characterised as the ‘rolling estate River Alde is typical of the transition between this character claylands’ landscape character type. This is a valley side area and the adjacent NCA83: South Norfolk and High landscape of clay loams with parklands and fragmented Suffolk Claylands to the west. NCA83 is a predominantly flat woodland. The key characteristics are described in the clay plateau incised by numerous small-scale wooded river Landscape Character Assessment as: valleys. • “Flat landscape of light loams and sandy soils; 7.2.6. At a local level, the site is predominantly located in the ‘rolling estate sandlands’ landscape character type • Rolling valley-side landscape; as identified in the Suffolk County Landscape Character • Medium clay and loamy soils; Assessment (Ref. 7.2.2) and shown on Figure 7.2.1. The key characteristics are described in the Landscape Character • Organic pattern of fields; Assessment as: • Occasional areas of more rational planned fields; • “Rolling river terraces and coastal slopes; • Numerous landscape parks; • Sandy and free draining soils with areas of heathland; 376 | Sizewell C • Substantial villages; 7.2.12. The western end of the route falls within a locally designated landscape that covers the River Alde valley. • Fragmented woodland cover, both ancient and This wraps around to the north of Farnham, immediately plantation; and adjacent to the eastern end of the proposed route, as well as along the valley of the River Fromus to the east. These are • Winding hedged and occasionally sunken lanes”. referred to as Special Landscape Areas (SLA), and cover a relatively large proportion of the study area. 7.2.9. The locations of different groups of people within the 2km study area (judged to be appropriate to cover b) Environmental design and embedded mitigation all potentially material impacts during construction and operation) who may experience views of the proposed i) Construction development are shown on Figure 7.2.1. The key visual receptors within the study area include the following: 7.2.13. During the construction of the road, mitigation to help to manage and reduce potential landscape and visual • The settlements of Stratford St Andrew, Farnham, Benhall effects would be difficult to achieve. However, potential Green and Little Glemham. mitigation measures during construction include providing localised screening and areas of new planting early on, • Transport routes including the existing A12 to the east allowing such screening and planting to become established and west, and the A1094 at the eastern end of the throughout construction and for the operational stage. Early proposed route. planting would be likely to include locations in the vicinity of • Recreational routes including four footpaths crossing the residential properties such as Farnham Hall. proposed route (E-243/001/0, E-243/003/0, E-243/004/0 7.2.14. In addition, where possible, the construction and E-243/006/0 as discussed in Section 7.4 of this compounds would be located in close proximity to existing chapter on amenity and recreation); further footpaths east road infrastructure, in areas already disturbed by roads and and west of the proposed route towards its eastern end; traffic. Existing vegetation would be retained around the and Sustrans Regional Cycle Route (41/42) and Suffolk compound areas to reduce visibility of the compound. Coastal Cycle Route following the same alignment, running in a north south direction along existing minor 7.2.15.
Recommended publications
  • 2796 This Is About Air Quality and Potential Related Health Hazards
    Submission ID: 2796 This is about air quality and potential related health hazards from increased traffic flow and standing vehicles at proposed Yoxford roundabout (A12/A1120/B1122 junction). People in Yoxford Survey 2017 expressed most concern about traffic in the village. The proposed roundabout will result in standing idling vehicles from the North, South and West with increased flow from N at Darsham P&R ( buses, workers' cars adding to daily load), returning traffic from site along B1122 and the arriving N bound load from Saxmundham and Wickham Market P&R being joined by stacking traffic along A1120 in Yoxford village waiting to turn N andS onto A12. 12-15 years of 700 HGV and 400 LGV movements will cause increased particulate matter from idling vehicles waiting at these junctions. The 2011 Suffolk CC report and the 2017 Suffolk Council reports both mention high rates of PM at queuing for the petrol station at Stratford St Andrew. This measured phenomenon will be apparent in increased severity and concentration at Yoxford if the roundabout is constructed. introducing this health hazard to the residents - some elderly, some children en route to school, will result over the years of the proposed construction in diminished lung health ( asthma, COPD) and brain and heart function. You will no doubt have read of the first recorded death from pollution being that of 9 year old Ella Kissidebra in London last year.. This is a canary in a coal mine moment fore us here. Introducing a 15 year long deliberate increase in PM without an EIA from the proposer of this build would seem to be a cruel and damaging step not only to us in Yoxford but also to people in the East Suffolk area.
    [Show full text]
  • SUFFOLK Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society
    Entries in red - require a SUFFOLK Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road Parish Location Position SU_BGIW00 TM 3372 8917 A144 BUNGAY Bungay Centre by the road SU_BGIW00A TM 351 881 A144 BUNGAY SE of Bungay on the verge SU_BGIW01 TM 3493 8814 A144 ST MARY SOUTH ELMHAM OTHERWISE HOMERSFIELD St Mary's Parish by the road SU_BGIW02 TM 3614 8724 A144 ST JOHN ILKETSHALL St John's by the road SU_BGIW04 TM 3739 8377 A144 ST LAWRENCE ILKETSHALL Ilketshall St Lawrence by the road SU_BGIW05 TM 3812 8269 A144 SPEXHALL Spexhall Hall by the road SU_BGIW06 TM 3850 8126 A144 SPEXHALL Spexhall by the road SU_BGIW07 TM 390 796 A144 HALESWORTH Bramfield Road by the road SU_BGIW08 TM 38964 78093 was A144 HALESWORTH Bungay Road, just before new bypass by lamp post SU_BGIW09 TM 3842 7682 A144 HALESWORTH Halesworth by the road SU_BGIW10 TM 397 756 A144 WENHASTON WITH MELLS HAMLET Mells by the road SU_BGIW11 TM 3982 7421 A144 BRAMFIELD Bramfield by the road SU_BGIW12 TM 4008 7268 A144 BRAMFIELD Bramfieldhall Wood by the road SU_BUCA10 TM 0054 5903 road ONEHOUSE Lower Road, 5m NW of Lodge Cottage by the road SU_BUSC03 TL 89291 67110 A143 GREAT BARTON E of The Forge, The Street on verge, back to high cut hedge SU_BUSC05 TL 91912 68913 A143 PAKENHAM E of Queach Farm by the road SU_BUSC07 TL 94258 71190 A143 IXWORTH THORPE N of roundabout with A1088 on open verge SU_BUSC08 TL 95393 72317 A143 STANTON Bury Road, Alecock's Grave on verge just W of crossroads SU_BUSC11 TL 9930 7420 A143 HEPWORTH Hepworth South Common by
    [Show full text]
  • PARISH COUNCIL MEETING ALDRINGHAM-CUM-THORPE HELD on 7TH JANUARY 2019 at 7.00Pm the TOWER ROOM THORPENESS DRAFT MINUTES
    PARISH COUNCIL MEETING ALDRINGHAM-CUM-THORPE HELD ON 7TH JANUARY 2019 at 7.00pm THE TOWER ROOM THORPENESS DRAFT MINUTES PRESENT: MR E ATKINSON, MR D MAYHEW, MR B DAVIES, MRS M JONES, MRS P MCLARDY, MR S SQUIRRELL, MR A WILLIAMS & 3 PARISHIONERS PARISHIONERS FORUM – 10 MINUTE ALLOCATION Mike Trapp raised concerns relating to SPR’s proposals. Funding for the Defibrillator will be covered under item 7. Finance on the Agenda. Bill Searle asked if a play space area on The Green, Mill Hill, Aldringham could be considered. 1. APOLOGIES Suffolk Coastal District Council - Councillor T.J. Haworth-Culf 2. DECLARATION OF INTEREST None 3. MINUTES Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held on 26th November 2018 were signed as a true record by the Chairman. 4. REPORTS a) SUFFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL – COUNCILLOR RUSS RAINGER Russ reported on the Sizewell C Consultation which is currently running from 4th January until Friday 29th March 2019. The Stage 3 Consultation - Suffolk Coastal District Council and Suffolk County Council are inviting representatives from Councils to attend a joint event on Tuesday 22nd January 2019 at High Lodge, Darsham. Russ has arranged for a site meeting this coming Wednesday 9th January at 10.00 am representatives from Anglian Water Company and SCC Highways will make further investigations on the flood problem on Aldringham Lane. The faulty Street Light in Thorpeness - UK Power Network has been and carried out repair work, unfortunately it is still out of action. Russ offered to look into this. SUFFOLK COASTAL DISTRICT COUNCIL – COUNCILLORS MAUREEN JONES & T.J. HAWORTH-CULF Suffolk Coastal Final Draft Local Plan The Suffolk Coastal Final Draft Local Plan is a comprehensive Local Plan for the District for the period 2018 to 2036.
    [Show full text]
  • Sizewell C Stage 3 Town and Parish Event 22 January 2018 Key Issue Design
    Sizewell C Stage 3 Town and Parish Event 22 January 2018 Key Issue Design Town/parish Comments from Table 1 Leiston cum Sizewell Town Pylons that have been added in this consultation are of a concern Council. from a visual basis. There should be no pylons. Design of the causeway for the beach landing stage and access to and along the beach when operational. Relocation of B car park is a concern along with Gabbard works and interconnectors, how will the C works impact be assessed in conjunction. Sandy colour of buildings preferred. Reduction in height of office blocks is good but location of training centre queried. General site layout queried on how it will work going forward, concern that too much is being built on the site footprint and that footprint is encroaching on the beach. 400 caravan spaces is of a concern. Comments from Table 2 Aldringham Parish Council Should be pressing exemplar design for AONB. Rendlesham Parish Council Nuclear regulator is driven by safety not interested in safety. Chillesford Parish meeting Report dismisses underground cables. Aldringham Parish Council Detrimental effect on the wildlife – AONB RSPB. Aldeburgh Town Council Generic design – hasn’t been designed for an AONB. Suffolk County Council Is Hinkley being built with pylons? Aldeburgh Town Council They’re not allowed to clad it or paint it. Aldringham Parish Council Sizewell B is an iconic building and looks good. This must be the same Southwold Town Council This design will be based on Hinkley. Aldringham Parish Council Why are they removing the mound? Chillesford Parish meeting Mission creep.
    [Show full text]
  • Yoxford Conservation Area Appraisal
    8 Yoxford Conservation Area Appraisal February 2020 0 Bibliography Bettley, James & Pevsner, Nikolaus. The Buildings of England, Suffolk: East (London, 2015) Delf, Charles Yoxford (Yoxford, 1971) Historic England. England’s Places – Yoxford https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/photos/englands- places/gallery/11297?place=Yoxford%2c+SUFFOLK+(Parish)&terms=Yoxford&searchtype=e nglandsplaces&i=1&wm=1&bc=16|17 Historic England. National Heritage List for England https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/advanced- search?searchType=nhleadvancedsearch Howard Jonathan A Thousand Fancies, The Collection of Charles Wade of Snowshill Manor (Stroud, 2016) Jessop, Michael Days Far Away, Memories of Charles Paget Wade 1883-1956 (Tewkesbury, 1996) Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government, National Planning Policy Framework (London, 2018) https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment _data/file/740441/National_Planning_Policy_Framework_web_accessible_version.pdf Spooner, Sarah. Regions and Designed Landscapes in Georgian England (Abingdon, 2016) Stell, Christopher. Nonconformist Chapels in Eastern England (London, 2002) Suffolk Coastal District Council. Supplementary Planning Guidance 6: Historic Parks and Gardens (Woodbridge 1995) http://www.eastsuffolk.gov.uk/assets/Planning/Suffolk- Coastal-Local-Plan/Supplementary-Planning-Guidance/SPG6-Historic-parks-and- gardens.pdf Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service. Report 2008/198 Cockfield Hall A Desk Based Assessment (Ipswich, 2008)
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Parish: Stratford St. Andrew
    1. Parish: Stratford St. Andrew Meaning: Ford by which Roman Road crossed river 2. Hundred: Plomesgate Deanery: Orford (−1914), Saxmundham (1914−) Union: Plomesgate RDC/UDC: (E. Suffolk) Plomesgate R.D. (1894−1934), Blyth R.D. (1934−1974), Suffolk Coastal D.C. (1974−) Other administrative details: Framlingham Petty Sessional Division Framlingham and Saxmundham County Court District 3. Area: 800 acres (1912) 4. Soils: Mixed: a. Deep well drained sandy soils, some very acid, risk wind erosion b. Slowly permeable, seasonally waterlogged, some calcareous, clay and fine loams over clay soils c. Deep fine loam soils with slowly permeable subsoils, slight seasonal waterlogging, similar fine/coarse loam over clay soils d. Some deep peat soils associated with clay over sandy soils, high groundwater levels, risk of flooding by river 5. Types of farming: 1086 8 acres meadow, 2 cattle, 15 pigs, 30 sheep, 27 goats, 1 mill 1500–1640 Thirsk: Sheep-corn region where sheep are main fertilizing agent, bred for fattening. Barley main cash crop. Also has similarities with wood−pasture region with pasture, meadow, dairying and some pig keeping 1818 Marshall: Wide variations of crop ad management techniques including summer fallow in preparation for corn and rotation of turnip, barley, clover, wheat on lighter lands 1937 Main crops: Wheat, roots, barley, hay 1969 Trist: More intensive cereal growing and sugar beet 6. Enclosure: 1 7. Settlement: 1975 River Alde forms natural boundary to NE. Small compact development around central church. Few scattered farms. Inhabited houses: 1674 – 14, 1801 – 21, 1851 – 44, 1871 – 45, 1901 – 41, 1951 – 58, 1981 – 58 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk Coastal Local Development Framework Core Strategy - Preferred Options
    Sustainability Appraisal of the Suffolk Coastal Local Development Framework Core Strategy - Preferred Options including Development Control Policies and Strategic Housing Locations also including Appropriate Assessment – screening & scoping December 2008 Suffolk Coastal District Council is grateful to the Research & Intelligence Group, Planning and Performance Improvement, Suffolk County Council, upon whose work this appraisal is based Sustainability Appraisal 1 CONTENTS Page Non-technical summary 4 1.1 Non-technical summary 1.2 Likely significant effects of core strategy policies 1.3 Likely significant effects of development control policies 1.4 Difference the process has made 1.5 How to comment on the report Introduction 6 2. Introduction 2.1 Purpose of the report 2.2 Compliance with SEA directive and regulations 3. Method of appraisal 3.1 Approach to sustainability appraisal 3.2 Who carried out the sustainability appraisal 3.3 Who was consulted, when and how 3.4 Difficulties encountered 4. State of the environment in Suffolk Coastal 4.1 description of baseline characteristics 4.2 Predicted future baseline 4.3 Main issues and problems identified 4.4 Assumptions and limitations on information 5. Sustainability objectives 5.1 Links to other policies, plans and programmes 5.2 The SA framework 5.3 Compatibility of SA and Plan objectives 5.4 Mitigation Core Strategy policies 22 6. Appraisal of core strategy 6.1 Statutory purpose 6.2 Links with national policy & other plans 6.3 Core strategy policies and options 6.4 Significant effects 6.5 Mitigation 6.6 Uncertainties and risks 6.7 Other observations 6.9 Implementation & proposals for monitoring Development Control policies 30 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Over 100 Rural Business Owners September 2020
    LETTER BY OVER 100 RURAL BUSINESS OWNERS to PM & SECRETARIES OF STATE 25 September 2020 The letter below is also signed by a further four businesses, represented by seven individuals, who requested their names be withheld from publication. It was published in the East Anglian Daily Times https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/sizewell-c-construction-opposed-by-suffolk-businesses-2700468 To: The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP, The Rt Hon Alok Sharma MP, The Rt Hon George Eustice MP, Minette Batters, President National Farmers’ Union Mark Bridgeman, President, Country Landowners’ Association Stephen Miles, President, Suffolk Agricultural Association cc Rt Hon Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park, Victoria Prentis MP, Lord Gardiner of Kimble, The Rt Hon Therese Coffey MP, Dr Dan Poulter MP, Peter Aldous MP, The Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP, James Cartlidge MP, Jo Churchill MP, Tom Hunt MP Cllrs Matthew Hicks and Richard Rout, Suffolk County Council. Cllrs Steve Gallant and Craig Rivett, East Suffolk Council We the undersigned, as rural business owners, farmers and landowners in Suffolk, write to express our opposition to EDF’s plans to build two new nuclear reactors at Sizewell. The threat of Sizewell C has been hanging over the heads of many of our number for at least eight years now with no immediate end in sight. This would be tolerable if the Sizewell C project was for the “greater good” but we have concluded that it is not necessary to meet the UK’s commitment to net zero, and would be a slow, risky and expensive waste of taxpayers’ money that removes opportunities to make use of alternative, green, deliverable and cost-effective energy solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • SZC Bk6 ES V5 Ch6 Landsca
    The Sizewell C Project 6.6 Volume 5 Two Village Bypass Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Revision: 1.0 Applicable Regulation: Regulation 5(2)(a) PINS Reference Number: EN010012 May 2020 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 SIZEWELL C PROJECT – ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Contents 6. Landscape and Visual .............................................................................................. 1 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 6.2 Legislation, policy and guidance ............................................................................... 1 6.3 Methodology ............................................................................................................. 4 6.4 Baseline environment ............................................................................................. 15 6.5 Environmental design and mitigation ...................................................................... 26 6.6 Assessment ............................................................................................................ 28 6.7 Mitigation and monitoring ........................................................................................ 51 6.8 Residual effects ...................................................................................................... 51 References .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Prospects’: the Siting and Construction of Sizewell a Power Station 1957-1966
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch ‘Nuclear prospects’: the siting and construction of Sizewell A power station 1957-1966. Wall, C. This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Contemporary British History. The final definitive version is available online: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13619462.2018.1519424 © 2018 Taylor & Francis The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] ‘Nuclear prospects’: the siting and construction of Sizewell A power station 1957-1966. Abstract This paper examines the siting and construction of a Magnox nuclear power station on the Suffolk coast. The station was initially welcomed by local politicians as a solution to unemployment but was criticised by an organised group of local communist activists who predicted how the restriction zone would restrict future development. Oral history interviews provide insights into conditions on the construction site and the social effects on the nearby town. Archive material reveals the spatial and development restrictions imposed with the building of the power station, which remains on the shoreline as a monument to the ‘atomic age’. This material is contextualised in the longer economic and social history of a town that moved from the shadow of nineteenth century paternalistic industry into the glare of the nuclear construction program and became an early example of the eclipsing of local democracy by the centralised nuclear state.
    [Show full text]
  • England Coast Path Report 2 Sizewell to Dunwich
    www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath England Coast Path Stretch: Aldeburgh to Hopton-on-Sea Report AHS 2: Sizewell to Dunwich Part 2.1: Introduction Start Point: Sizewell beach car park (grid reference: TM 4757 6300) End Point: Dingle Marshes south, Dunwich (grid reference: TM 4735 7074) Relevant Maps: AHS 2a to AHS 2e 2.1.1 This is one of a series of linked but legally separate reports published by Natural England under section 51 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, which make proposals to the Secretary of State for improved public access along and to this stretch of coast between Aldeburgh to Hopton-on-Sea. 2.1.2 This report covers length AHS 2 of the stretch, which is the coast between Sizewell and Dunwich. It makes free-standing statutory proposals for this part of the stretch, and seeks approval for them by the Secretary of State in their own right under section 52 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. 2.1.3 The report explains how we propose to implement the England Coast Path (“the trail”) on this part of the stretch, and details the likely consequences in terms of the wider ‘Coastal Margin’ that will be created if our proposals are approved by the Secretary of State. Our report also sets out: any proposals we think are necessary for restricting or excluding coastal access rights to address particular issues, in line with the powers in the legislation; and any proposed powers for the trail to be capable of being relocated on particular sections (“roll- back”), if this proves necessary in the future because of coastal change.
    [Show full text]
  • Lowestoft and Felixstowe to Ipswich 8
    "National Express Book 3" Page: 3 Thu Oct 18 10:33:45 BST 20 CyanMagentaYellowBlack Lowestoft and Felixstowe to Ipswich 8 Mondays to Fridays ! ! ! ! Norwich… … … … … … … … d 0536 0627 0800 0855 Lowestoft… … … …b … … … … d 0525 0616 0641 0727 0907 1007 Oulton… … …Broad … … South … … … d 0531 0622 0647 0733 0913 1013 Beccles… … … … … … … … a 0540 0631 0656 0742 0922 1022 Beccles… … … … … … … … d 0541 0632 0657 0743 0925 1025 Brampton… … … … … … … … d 05x49 06x40 07x05 07x51 09x33 10x33 … … … … … … … … Halesworth ■ d 0556 0647 0712 0758 0941 1041 … … … … … … … … Darsham ■ d 0605 0656 0721 0807 0949 1049 … … … … … … … … Saxmundham ■ a 0613 0704 0729 0815 0957 1057 … … … … … … … … Saxmundham ■ d 0613 0704 0729 0817 0957 1057 Wickham… … … Market … … … … … d 0623 0714 0739 0827 1007 1107 Melton… … … … … … … … d 0630 0721 0746 0834 1013 1113 Woodbridge… … … … … … … … d 0635 0726 0751 0839 1018 1118 … … … … … … … … L L L L L L Felixstowe ■ d 0534 0636 0747 0854 0928 1028 Trimley… … … … … … … … d 0537 L 0639 L L 0750 L 0857 0931 L 1031 L Derby… … …Road … … … … … d 0547 L 0649 L L 0800 L 0909 0941 L 1041 L Westerfield… … … … … … … … d 0552 L 0654 0737 0802 0806 L 0914 0946 L 1046 L Ipswich… … … b … … … … … a 0601 0653 0702 0744 0809 0814 0857 0924 0954 1036 1054 1136 Harwich… … … Int … f… b… … … a 0728 London… … … Liverpool … … … St. … U … a 0727 0823 0904 0924 1019 1044 1119 1155 1219 1255 ! ! ! Norwich… … … … … … … … d 1005 1058 1205 1258 1405 1458 Lowestoft… … … …b … … … … d 1107 1207 1307 1407 1507 1607 Oulton… … …Broad … … South … … … d 1113
    [Show full text]