Correlation of Very Low and Low Frequency Signal Variations at Mid-Latitudes with Magnetic Activity and Outer-Zone Particles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Correlation of Very Low and Low Frequency Signal Variations at Mid-Latitudes with Magnetic Activity and Outer-Zone Particles Ann. Geophys., 32, 1455–1462, 2014 www.ann-geophys.net/32/1455/2014/ doi:10.5194/angeo-32-1455-2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Correlation of very low and low frequency signal variations at mid-latitudes with magnetic activity and outer-zone particles A. Rozhnoi1, M. Solovieva1, V. Fedun2, M. Hayakawa3, K. Schwingenschuh4, and B. Levin5 1Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, 10 B. Gruzinskaya, Moscow, 123995, Russia 2Space Systems Laboratory, Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK 3University of Electro-Communications, Advanced Wireless Communications Research Center, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu Tokyo, 182-8585, Japan 4Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, 6 Schmiedlstraße, 8042, Graz, Austria 5Institute of marine geology and geophysics Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 1B Nauki str., Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 693022, Russia Correspondence to: A. Rozhnoi ([email protected]) Received: 31 May 2014 – Revised: 28 October 2014 – Accepted: 31 October 2014 – Published: 4 December 2014 Abstract. The disturbances of very low and low frequency Hayakawa, 2008; Hayakawa et al., 2010; Hayakawa, 2011; signals in the lower mid-latitude ionosphere caused by mag- Biagi et al., 2004, 2007; Rozhnoi et al., 2004, 2009). This netic storms, proton bursts and relativistic electron fluxes band of electromagnetic waves is trapped between the lower are investigated on the basis of VLF–LF measurements ob- ionosphere and the surface of the Earth, and reflected from tained in the Far East and European networks. We have found the boundary between the upper atmosphere and lower iono- that magnetic storm (−150 < Dst < −100 nT) influence is sphere at altitudes of ≈ 70 km (daytime) and ≈ 90 km (night- not strong on variations of VLF–LF signals. The anoma- time). As a result, VLF–LF signals contain important infor- lies with negative amplitude were registered during the main mation about the physical processes in the reflection region and recovery phases for several magnetic storms (mainly for of the ionosphere and its variability. The selection and iden- three northernmost paths). The correlation between VLF– tification of the lower ionosphere perturbations, excited by LF signals and geomagnetic activity is rather weak even seismic activity, tsunamis or volcanic eruptions from other for these paths (≈ 12–18 %). Also, the correlation between possible external sources (e.g., planetary waves, cyclones magnetic activity and VLF signal variations recorded on- and typhoons), are difficult problems. Additionally, to the board the DEMETER satellite is not found. The significant Earth origin disturbances, the ionosphere could be forcing influence of outer-zone particles (energetic particle sensor from above by magnetic storms, solar X-ray flashes, proton on board/Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite bursts and electron fluxes. The study of the amplitude and (GOES) measurements) on the VLF–LF signal variations is phase of VLF–LF anomalies of non-seismic origin is neces- found for almost half of the sub-ionospheric paths. sary for the reliable identification of seismic anomalies. Keywords. Ionosphere (mid-latitude ionosphere) Previously, VLF phase and amplitude variations and their relationship with geomagnetic activity at mid-latitudes have been studied in the region 10.2–13.6 kHz of the global navigation system “Omega” (see, e.g., Belrose and 1 Introduction Thomas, 1968; Potemra and Rosenberg, 1973; Kikuchi, 1981; Sokolov, 2011). In general, the phase disturbances The measurements of sub-ionospheric very low and low fre- were registered during magnetic storms and the days follow- quency radio signals in the mid-latitude paths in the range ing the recovery of the geomagnetic field. It was found that of 15–50 kHz are broadly used for the identification of earth- quake electromagnetic precursors (see, e.g., Molchanov and Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 1456 A. Rozhnoi et al.: Correlation of very low and low frequency variations at mid-latitudes Figure 2. The same as in Fig.1 but for the European network. The position of the receivers in Moscow (MOS) and Graz (GRZ) and different transmitters in Europe is shown on the map. Sig- nals from six transmitters are analysed: NRK (37.5 kHz), ICV Figure 1. The map of the wave paths in the Far East network. The (20.27 kHz), ITS (45.9 kHz), TBB (26.7 kHz), DHO (23.4 kHz) and location of receivers in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky (PTK), Yuzhno- GBZ (19.58 kHz). Sakhalinsk (YSH) and Yuzhno-Kurilsk (YUK) together with the position of the transmitters JJI (22.2 kHz), JJY (40 kHz), NWC (19.8 kHz) and NPM (21.4 kHz) are shown. sub ionospheric VLF–LF signals propagation in various mid- latitude paths for the Far East region and European networks. Besides ground-based observations, the correlation method VLF anomalies can serve as an indirect indicator of energetic is used to analyse the VLF variations recorded onboard the electron injection into the ionosphere. DEMETER satellite. System Omega was terminated in 1997 and therefore in our analysis, we used another navigation, as well as time service transmitters with different frequencies. The appear- 2 Source data ance of anomalies in the VLF–LF signal varies for different wave paths. They strongly depend on path length and its ori- The analysed data were measured by the VLF–LF receivers entation relative to the magnetic field and signal frequency. settled in the Far East and European regions. Their loca- For example, the analysis of the LF signal (40 kHz) vari- tions are shown in Figs.1 and2, correspondingly. Receivers ations registered by the Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky station have been developed in New Zealand (http://ultramsk.com/) has shown (see, e.g., Rozhnoi et al., 2006): (i) that LF sig- and they are able to provide continuous monitoring of the nal anomalies are typical for the main phase of a magnetic amplitude and phase of MSK (minimum shift key) modu- storm in the night sector; (ii) the similarity of phase and am- lated signals in a frequency range of 10–50 kHz from several plitude anomalies of the LF signal to the structure of the si- VLF–LF transmitters, simultaneously. Each receiver is de- multaneously observed Pi3 geomagnetic pulsations; (iii) the signed to record signals with time resolutions in a range from moderate correlation between Dst index of magnetic activity 50 ms up to 60 s. For the present study, we used 20 s sam- and phase and amplitude anomalies of the LF signal; (iv) the pling frequency measurements obtained from three Far East strong correlation between proton bursts, fluxes of relativis- stations: Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky (PTK) (53:15◦ N; work tic electrons registered on the board of the GOES satellite since 2000), Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk (YSH) (46:96◦ N; work and characteristics of sub-ionospheric signal. Rozhnoi et al. since 2009) and Yuzhno-Kurilsk (YUK) (44:035◦ N; work (2006) have used another method, which was close to epoch since 2011). The PTK station registers signals from four analysis and gave several examples of case study analysis of transmitters: JJI (22.2 kHz, 32:08◦ N, Japan), JJY (40 kHz, the LF data during electron and proton fluxes. For further 37:37◦ N, Japan), NWC (19.8 kHz, 21:81◦ S, Australia) and investigation of the VLF–LF variations and their relation to NPM (21.4 kHz, 21:42◦ N, Hawaiian Islands). The YSH and the space weather, the existing VLF–LF network was signif- YUK receivers are able to register signals from eight trans- icantly extended in the Far East region and Europe. The new mitters simultaneously. The wave paths from the JJI and JJY receivers were installed in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk and Yuzhno- transmitters are at mid-latitudes; paths from the NPM trans- Kurilsk (Russia), Graz (Austria) and Sheffield (UK). This mitter are in mid- and low latitudes, and paths from the NWC improvement and the following study are essential for (i) a transmitter are in low and mid-latitudes and cross the Equa- better identification of electromagnetic precursors of earth- tor. Note, these paths are long and cross the regions in which quakes and (ii) for finding the lower ionosphere response to typhoons occur frequently. tsunamis and volcano eruptions. In this work, the case study To study the VLF–LF disturbances in the European re- and correlation analysis are applied for the investigation of gion, we used data from Moscow (MOS) (55:75◦ N; work Ann. Geophys., 32, 1455–1462, 2014 www.ann-geophys.net/32/1455/2014/ A. Rozhnoi et al.: Correlation of very low and low frequency variations at mid-latitudes 1457 Figure 3. An example of the anomalies observed at the amplitude and phase of the JJY (40 kHz) signal recorded in the PTK station during the magnetic storm on 9 March 2012. Three top panels show X-ray, outer-zone protons and electrons (GOES the satellite), and the next panel shows Dst index magnetic activity. In the two bottom panels, the amplitude and phase of the LF signal is shown. Red and black lines are the observed and monthly averaged signals, respectively. The circles highlight the anomalies in the amplitude and phase related to the magnetic storm. since 2009) and Graz (GRZ) (47:065◦ N; work since 2009) used amplitudes of the VLF–LF signals, which do not require stations. These stations can register signals from 12 trans- any additional preprocessing. Due to the complicity of VLF– mitters deployed in Europe, Asia and America. For analy- LF transmitter signal modulation, the phase identification re- sis, we selected the paths passing over seismo-active regions quires special processing. For example, only in one case (see of southern Europe; i.e. the signals from TBB (26.7 kHz, Fig.3) has the phase preprocessing been used to evaluate 37.4◦ N Turkey), ICV (20.27 kHz, 40:92◦ N, Sardinia) and phase anomalies.
Recommended publications
  • WWVB: a Half Century of Delivering Accurate Frequency and Time by Radio
    Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004 Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology WWVB: A Half Century of Delivering Accurate Frequency and Time by Radio Michael A. Lombardi and Glenn K. Nelson National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO 80305 [email protected] [email protected] In commemoration of its 50th anniversary of broadcasting from Fort Collins, Colorado, this paper provides a history of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) radio station WWVB. The narrative describes the evolution of the station, from its origins as a source of standard frequency, to its current role as the source of time-of-day synchronization for many millions of radio controlled clocks. Key words: broadcasting; frequency; radio; standards; time. Accepted: February 26, 2014 Published: March 12, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004 1. Introduction NIST radio station WWVB, which today serves as the synchronization source for tens of millions of radio controlled clocks, began operation from its present location near Fort Collins, Colorado at 0 hours, 0 minutes Universal Time on July 5, 1963. Thus, the year 2013 marked the station’s 50th anniversary, a half century of delivering frequency and time signals referenced to the national standard to the United States public. One of the best known and most widely used measurement services provided by the U. S. government, WWVB has spanned and survived numerous technological eras. Based on technology that was already mature and well established when the station began broadcasting in 1963, WWVB later benefitted from the miniaturization of electronics and the advent of the microprocessor, which made low cost radio controlled clocks possible that would work indoors.
    [Show full text]
  • Reception of Low Frequency Time Signals
    Reprinted from I-This reDort show: the Dossibilitks of clock svnchronization using time signals I 9 transmitted at low frequencies. The study was madr by obsirvins pulses Vol. 6, NO. 9, pp 13-21 emitted by HBC (75 kHr) in Switxerland and by WWVB (60 kHr) in tha United States. (September 1968), The results show that the low frequencies are preferable to the very low frequencies. Measurementi show that by carefully selecting a point on the decay curve of the pulse it is possible at distances from 100 to 1000 kilo- meters to obtain time measurements with an accuracy of +40 microseconds. A comparison of the theoretical and experimental reiulb permib the study of propagation conditions and, further, shows the drsirability of transmitting I seconds pulses with fixed envelope shape. RECEPTION OF LOW FREQUENCY TIME SIGNALS DAVID H. ANDREWS P. E., Electronics Consultant* C. CHASLAIN, J. DePRlNS University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium 1. INTRODUCTION parisons of atomic clocks, it does not suffice for clock For several years the phases of VLF and LF carriers synchronization (epoch setting). Presently, the most of standard frequency transmitters have been monitored accurate technique requires carrying portable atomic to compare atomic clock~.~,*,3 clocks between the laboratories to be synchronized. No matter what the accuracies of the various clocks may be, The 24-hour phase stability is excellent and allows periodic synchronization must be provided. Actually frequency calibrations to be made with an accuracy ap- the observed frequency deviation of 3 x 1o-l2 between proaching 1 x 10-11. It is well known that over a 24- cesium controlled oscillators amounts to a timing error hour period diurnal effects occur due to propagation of about 100T microseconds, where T, given in years, variations.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Years of VLF Worldwide Comparison of Atomic Frequency Standards
    RADIO SCIENCE, Vol. 2 (New Series), No. 6, June 1967 Five Years of VLF Worldwide Comparison of Atomic Frequency Standards B. E. Blair,' E. 1. Crow,2 and A. H. Morgan (Received January 19, 1967) The VLF radio broadcasts of GBR(16.0 kHz), NBA(18.0 or 24.0 kHz), and NSS(21.4 kHz) have enabled worldwide comparisons of atomic frequency standards to parts in 1O'O when received over varied paths and at distances up to 9000 or more kilometers. This paper summarizes a statistical analysis of such comparison data from laboratories in England, France, Switzerland, Sweden, Russia, Japan, Canada, and the United States during the 5-year period 1961-1965. The basic data are dif- ferences in 24-hr average frequencies between the local atomic standard and the received VLF radio signal expressed as parts in 10"'. The analysis of the more recent data finds the receiving laboratory standard deviations, &, and the transmission standard deviation, ?, to be a few parts in 10". Averag- ing frequencies over an increasing number of days has the effect of reducing iUi and ? to some extent. The variation of the & with propagation distance is studied. The VLF-LF long-term mean differences between standards are compared with the recent portable clock tests, and they agree to parts in IO". 1. Introduction points via satellites (Steele, Markowitz, and Lidback, 1964; Markowitz, Lidback, Uyeda, and Muramatsu, Six years ago in London, the XIIIth General Assem- 1966); improvements in the transmission of VLF and bly of URSI adopted a resolution (No. 2) which strongly LF radio signals (Milton, Fey, and Morgan, 1962; recommended continuous very-low-frequency (VLF) Barnes, Andrews, and Allan, 1965; Bonanomi, 1966; and low-frequency (LF) transmission monitoring US.
    [Show full text]
  • High Frequency (HF)
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1990-06 High Frequency (HF) radio signal amplitude characteristics, HF receiver site performance criteria, and expanding the dynamic range of HF digital new energy receivers by strong signal elimination Lott, Gus K., Jr. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/34806 NPS62-90-006 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, ,California DISSERTATION HIGH FREQUENCY (HF) RADIO SIGNAL AMPLITUDE CHARACTERISTICS, HF RECEIVER SITE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA, and EXPANDING THE DYNAMIC RANGE OF HF DIGITAL NEW ENERGY RECEIVERS BY STRONG SIGNAL ELIMINATION by Gus K. lott, Jr. June 1990 Dissertation Supervisor: Stephen Jauregui !)1!tmlmtmOlt tlMm!rJ to tJ.s. eave"ilIE'il Jlcg6iielw olil, 10 piolecl ailicallecl",olog't dU'ie 18S8. Btl,s, refttteste fer litis dOCdiii6i,1 i'lust be ,ele"ed to Sapeihil6iiddiil, 80de «Me, "aial Postg;aduulG Sclleel, MOli'CIG" S,e, 98918 &988 SF 8o'iUiid'ids" PM::; 'zt6lI44,Spawd"d t4aoal \\'&u 'al a a,Sloi,1S eai"i,al'~. 'Nsslal.;gtePl. Be 29S&B &198 .isthe 9aleMBe leclu,sicaf ,.,FO'iciaKe" 6alite., ea,.idiO'. Statio", AlexB •• d.is, VA. !!!eN 8'4!. ,;M.41148 'fl'is dUcO,.Mill W'ilai.,s aliilical data wlrose expo,l is idst,icted by tli6 Arlil! Eurse" SSPItial "at FRIis ee, 1:I.9.e. gec. ii'S1 sl. seq.) 01 tlls Exr;01l ftle!lIi"isllatioli Act 0' 19i'9, as 1tI'I'I0"e!ee!, "Filill ell, W.S.€'I ,0,,,,, 1i!4Q1, III: IIlIiI. 'o'iolatioils of ltrese expo,lla;;s ale subject to 960616 an.iudl pSiiaities.
    [Show full text]
  • NIST Time and Frequency Services (NIST Special Publication 432)
    Time & Freq Sp Publication A 2/13/02 5:24 PM Page 1 NIST Special Publication 432, 2002 Edition NIST Time and Frequency Services Michael A. Lombardi Time & Freq Sp Publication A 2/13/02 5:24 PM Page 2 Time & Freq Sp Publication A 4/22/03 1:32 PM Page 3 NIST Special Publication 432 (Minor text revisions made in April 2003) NIST Time and Frequency Services Michael A. Lombardi Time and Frequency Division Physics Laboratory (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 432, dated June 1991) January 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Donald L. Evans, Secretary TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION Phillip J. Bond, Under Secretary for Technology NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY Arden L. Bement, Jr., Director Time & Freq Sp Publication A 2/13/02 5:24 PM Page 4 Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY SPECIAL PUBLICATION 432 (SUPERSEDES NIST SPECIAL PUBLICATION 432, DATED JUNE 1991) NATL. INST.STAND.TECHNOL. SPEC. PUBL. 432, 76 PAGES (JANUARY 2002) CODEN: NSPUE2 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 2002 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Website: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202)
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying and Removing Tilt Noise from Low-Frequency (0.1
    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90, 4, pp. 952–963, August 2000 Identifying and Removing Tilt Noise from Low-Frequency (Ͻ0.1 Hz) Seafloor Vertical Seismic Data by Wayne C. Crawford and Spahr C. Webb Abstract Low-frequency (Ͻ0.1 Hz) vertical-component seismic noise can be re- duced by 25 dB or more at seafloor seismic stations by subtracting the coherent signals derived from (1) horizontal seismic observations associated with tilt noise, and (2) pressure measurements related to infragravity waves. The reduction in ef- fective noise levels is largest for the poorest stations: sites with soft sediments, high currents, shallow water, or a poorly leveled seismometer. The importance of precise leveling is evident in our measurements: low-frequency background vertical seismic radians 4מ10 ן spectra measured on a seafloor seismometer leveled to within 1 (0.006 degrees) are up to 20 dB quieter than on a nearby seismometer leveled to radians (0.2 degrees). The noise on the less precisely leveled sensor 3מ10 ן within 3 increases with decreasing frequency and is correlated with ocean tides, indicating that it is caused by tilting due to seafloor currents flowing across the instrument. At low frequencies, this tilting generates a seismic signal by changing the gravitational attraction on the geophones as they rotate with respect to the earth’s gravitational field. The effect is much stronger on the horizontal components than on the vertical, allowing significant reduction in vertical-component noise by subtracting the coher- ent horizontal component noise. This technique reduces the low-frequency vertical noise on the less-precisely leveled seismometer to below the noise level on the pre- cisely leveled seismometer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of the Ionosphere on Ultra-Low-Frequency Radio-Interferometric Observations? F
    A&A 615, A179 (2018) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833012 & © ESO 2018 Astrophysics The effect of the ionosphere on ultra-low-frequency radio-interferometric observations? F. de Gasperin1,2, M. Mevius3, D. A. Rafferty2, H. T. Intema1, and R. A. Fallows3 1 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 Hamburger Sternwarte, Universität Hamburg, Gojenbergsweg 112, 21029 Hamburg, Germany 3 ASTRON – the Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy, PO Box 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands Received 13 March 2018 / Accepted 19 April 2018 ABSTRACT Context. The ionosphere is the main driver of a series of systematic effects that limit our ability to explore the low-frequency (<1 GHz) sky with radio interferometers. Its effects become increasingly important towards lower frequencies and are particularly hard to calibrate in the low signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) regime in which low-frequency telescopes operate. Aims. In this paper we characterise and quantify the effect of ionospheric-induced systematic errors on astronomical interferometric radio observations at ultra-low frequencies (<100 MHz). We also provide guidelines for observations and data reduction at these frequencies with the LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR) and future instruments such as the Square Kilometre Array (SKA). Methods. We derive the expected systematic error induced by the ionosphere. We compare our predictions with data from the Low Band Antenna (LBA) system of LOFAR. Results. We show that we can isolate the ionospheric effect in LOFAR LBA data and that our results are compatible with satellite measurements, providing an independent way to measure the ionospheric total electron content (TEC).
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Low Frequency Active Acoustics As a Critical
    Low-Frequency Acoustics as an Antisubmarine Warfare Technology GORDON D. TYLER, JR. THE EMERGENCE OF LOW–FREQUENCY ACTIVE ACOUSTICS AS A CRITICAL ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE TECHNOLOGY For the three decades following World War II, the United States realized unparalleled success in strategic and tactical antisubmarine warfare operations by exploiting the high acoustic source levels of Soviet submarines to achieve long detection ranges. The emergence of the quiet Soviet submarine in the 1980s mandated that new and revolutionary approaches to submarine detection be developed if the United States was to continue to achieve its traditional antisubmarine warfare effectiveness. Since it is immune to sound-quieting efforts, low-frequency active acoustics has been proposed as a replacement for traditional passive acoustic sensor systems. The underlying science and physics behind this technology are currently being investigated as part of an urgent U.S. Navy initiative, but the United States and its NATO allies have already begun development programs for fielding sonars using low-frequency active acoustics. Although these first systems have yet to become operational in deep water, research is also under way to apply this technology to Third World shallow-water areas and to anticipate potential countermeasures that an adversary may develop. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE The nature of naval warfare changed dramatically capability of their submarine forces, and both countries following the conclusion of World War II when, in Jan- have come to regard these submarines as principal com- uary 1955, the USS Nautilus sent the message, “Under ponents of their tactical naval forces, as well as their way on nuclear power,” while running submerged from strategic arsenals.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular $2.50 Canada
    ICD-08635 JUNE 1986 $1.95 POPULAR $2.50 CANADA Now Incorporating SeSC011 Magazine The Official Publication of the Scanner Association of North America www.americanradiohistory.com ASLEEP...AWAY...ON-THE-JOB... DON'T MISS ANYTHING ON YOUR SCANNER Exclusive! Monitor volume Exclusive! Voice -tailored Exclusive! Delay time con- control is independent of speaker system for trol adjusts to hold for recording volume. listening clarity. reply messages. Exclusive! VOX level light Exclusive! Attractive assures perfect adjustment. molded high -impact cabinetry. A.do 11.,,_ 00e10110110) U.L. listed power supply ERTM included. TrJer:Activator A permanent record even when you're Hear while you record. not there! "What used to drive me crazy was that MONEY BACK GUARANTEE "Before I installed NiteLogger I always anytime the recorder was plugged into If you're dissatisfied in any way with seemed to miss the big stories'..." Now the scanner, the speaker was cut-off so Nitelogger, just return it to us prepaid solve the biggest frustration of scanner I couldn't hear what was going on!" within 25 days for a prompt, courteous enthusiasts: NiteLogger makes sure you'll NiteLogger's built-in monitor speaker and refund. For One Full Year NiteLogger hear it all, even if it happens at 3:47 a.m.! Monitor Level control solves the problem. is guaranteed to be free of defects in Foolproof operation...works every You control the volume from off to full on, workmanship and materials. Simply time! independent of recording levels. send prepaid to BMI for warranty repair. "I've tried rigging up recorders before only Buy with absolute confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Navigational Aids
    RADIO NAVIGATIONAL AIDS Publication No. 117 2014 Edition Prepared and published by the NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Springfield, VA © COPYRIGHT 2014 BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT NO COPYRIGHT CLAIMED UNDER TITLE 17 U.S.C. WARNING ON USE OF FLOATING AIDS TO NAVIGATION TO FIX A NAVIGATIONAL POSITION The aids to navigation depicted on charts comprise a system consisting of fixed and floating aids with varying degrees of reliability. Therefore, prudent mariners will not rely solely on any single aid to navigation, particularly a floating aid. The buoy symbol is used to indicate the approximate position of the buoy body and the sinker which secures the buoy to the seabed. The approximate position is used because of practical limitations in positioning and maintaining buoys and their sinkers in precise geographical locations. These limitations include, but are not limited to, inherent imprecisions in position fixing methods, prevailing atmospheric and sea conditions, the slope of and the material making up the seabed, the fact that buoys are moored to sinkers by varying lengths of chain, and the fact that buoy and/or sinker positions are not under continuous surveillance but are normally checked only during periodic maintenance visits which often occur more than a year apart. The position of the buoy body can be expected to shift inside and outside the charting symbol due to the forces of nature. The mariner is also cautioned that buoys are liable to be carried away, shifted, capsized, sunk, etc. Lighted buoys may be extinguished or sound signals may not function as the result of ice or other natural causes, collisions, or other accidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Time and Frequency Users' Manual
    ,>'.)*• r>rJfl HKra mitt* >\ « i If I * I IT I . Ip I * .aference nbs Publi- cations / % ^m \ NBS TECHNICAL NOTE 695 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/National Bureau of Standards Time and Frequency Users' Manual 100 .U5753 No. 695 1977 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 1 The National Bureau of Standards was established by an act of Congress March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is to strengthen and advance the Nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit To this end, the Bureau conducts research and provides: (1) a basis for the Nation's physical measurement system, (2) scientific and technological services for industry and government, a technical (3) basis for equity in trade, and (4) technical services to pro- mote public safety. The Bureau consists of the Institute for Basic Standards, the Institute for Materials Research the Institute for Applied Technology, the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology, the Office for Information Programs, and the Office of Experimental Technology Incentives Program. THE INSTITUTE FOR BASIC STANDARDS provides the central basis within the United States of a complete and consist- ent system of physical measurement; coordinates that system with measurement systems of other nations; and furnishes essen- tial services leading to accurate and uniform physical measurements throughout the Nation's scientific community, industry, and commerce. The Institute consists of the Office of Measurement Services, and the following center and divisions: Applied Mathematics
    [Show full text]
  • Low Frequency Machinery Monitoring: Measurement Considerations
    Low frequency machinery monitoring: measurement considerations Low frequency monitoring of industrial machinery requires specialized sensors, instrumentation and measurement techniques. The primary goal when measuring low frequency vibrations is to minimize electronic noise from the sensor and monitoring instrument. The sensor must contain low noise electronics to provide clean vibration signals and high output to overcome instrument noise. The impact of environmental and near machine electrical and mechanical noise can also affect low frequency measurements. In addition, sensor settling time, instrument setup and processing time must be considered. Finally, proper sensor handling and mounting techniques will help ensure quality measurements are made. 8435 Progress Drive Tel: +1 (301) 330 8811 wilcoxon.com Wilcoxon Sensing Technologies Frederick, MD 21701 [email protected] buy.wilcoxon.com Introduction to low frequency measurements Low frequency vibration monitoring is an integral part of the total predictive maintenance program. Failure of slow speed machinery can result in catastrophic machine damage, lost production, and worker safety hazards. New generations of sensors, instruments, and analysis techniques are available for measuring low frequency vibration. To be considered ‘low frequency’ condition monitoring, measurements generally must be within a 0.1 to 10 Hz (6 to 600 CPM) bandwidth. Applications include paper machines, cooling towers and slow speed agitators. Gearboxes, compressors and other higher speed machinery may also exhibit faults in this range. Many structural and geophysical measurements require very low frequency equipment and techniques. Low frequency applications are more complicated than general machinery monitoring. The relationship between acceleration, velocity and displacement with respect to vibration amplitude and machinery health redefines measurement technique and data analysis.
    [Show full text]