DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of the Prospects for Fusion Breeding of Fissile Material

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

< AECL-7259 ATOMIC ENERGY KS3Q L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE OF CANADA LIMITED \^^9 DU CANADA LIMITEE A REVIEW OF THE PROSPECTS FOR FUSION BREEDING OF FISSILE MATERIAL Obtention eventuelle de matieres fissiles provenant de reacteurs surgenerateurs a fusion J.S. GEIGER and G.A. BARTHOLOMEW Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories Laboratoires nucle'aires de Chalk River Chalk River, Ontario October 1981 octobre ATOMIC ENERGY OF CANADA LIMITED A REVIEW OF THE PROSPECTS FOR FUSION BREEDING OF FISSILE MATERIAL J.S. Geiger and G.A. Bartholomew, Editors Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories Chalk River, Ontario, KOJ 1JO 1981 October AECL-7259 L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE DU CANADA, LIMITEE Obtention éventuelle de matières fissiles provenant de réacteurs surgénérateurs à fusion J.S. Geiger et G.A. Bartholomew, Editeurs Résumé Ce rapport est le résultat d'une étude de huit mois effectuée par le groupe de l'EACL qui suit l'évolution des recherches en fusion, qui évalue la performance neutronique des divers systèmes de surgënération par fusion et qui estime les perspectives technologiques et économiques des réacteurs surgénérateurs à fusion comme source de matières fissiles pour les réacteurs CANDU fonctionnant au cycle de combustible à base de thorium. Laboratoires nucléaires de Chalk River Chalk River, Ontario, 30J 1J0 Octobre 1981 AECL-7259 ATOMIC ENERGY OF CANADA LIMITED A REVIEW OF THE PROSPECTS FOR FUSION BREEDING OF FISSILE MATERIAL J.S. Geiger and G.A. Bartholomew, Editors ABSTRACT This report is the result of an eight month study by the AECL Fusion Status Study Group. Ths objectives of this study were to review the current stat;is of fusion research, to evaluate the neutronic performance of various fusion-breeder systems, and to assess the economic and technological outlook for the fusion breeder as a source of fissile material to support CANDU reactors operating on the thorium fuel cycle. Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories Chalk River, Ontario, KOJ UO 1981 October AECL-7259 (i) CONTENTS Page 1. PREFACE i 2. INTRODUCTION (G.A. Bartholomew) 1 3. BASIC CONSIDERATIONS (J.5. Geiger and L.W. Funk) 5 3.1 Introduction 5 3.2 Conditions Required for Energy Generation from Fusion 7 3.3 Engineering Problems of Fusion 11 3.4 Fusion-Fission Hybrid Systems - Fissile Fuel Breeding 14 4. MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT (G.E. Lee-Whiting, C.R. Hoffmann, 17 F.C. Khanna, M.R. Shubaly, I.S. Towner and K.B. Winterbon) 4.1 Introduction 17 4.2 Mirror Fusion Devices 19 4.2.1 Simple Mirrors 19 4.2.2 Mim'mum-B Mirrors 20 4.2.-2.1 End Losses or Loss Cone 20 4.2.2.2 Instabilities 21 4.2.3 Tandem Mi rror System 22 4.2.3.1 End Cells or Plugs 23 4.2.3.2 The Central Cell 25 4.2.3.3 Thermal Barrier 26 4.2.3.4 Impurities 27 4.2.3.5 Instabilities 27 4.2.3.6 Experiments 28 4.2.4 Reactor Design 28 4.3 Tokamaks 32 4.3.1 The Tokamak Concept 32 4.3.2 Equilibrium 37 4.3.3 Stability 39 4.3.4 Particle and Energy Transport 43 4.3.5 Effects on Neutral Beams 45 4.3.6 Some Recent Experimental Results 47 4.3.7 Future Tokamak Experiments 50 4.3.8 Tokamak Reactors in General 55 4.3.9 Sjrtie Tokamak Hybrid Reactor Designs 58 4.3.9.1 Uestinghouse CTHR 58 4.3.9.2 An EPRI Tokamak 59 4.3.9.3 An Oak Ridge Symbiotic System 60 4.3.9.4 A Princeton Design 60 4.3.9.5 A Counterstreaming-Ion Tokamak Breeder 61 4.3.9.6 TORFA 62 4.3.9.7 Candidates for Economic Assessment 63 4.3.10 The Stellarator 63 (11) CONTENTS (Continued) Page 4.4 Other Magnetic-Confinement Devices 65 4.4.1 Tori 66 4.4.1.,1 ELMO Bumpy Torus 66 4.4.1. 2 Reversed Field Pinch 67 4.4.1. 3 Tormak 67 4.4.1. 4 Compact Tori 67 4.4.1. 5 Ion Ring Compressor 68 4.4.2 linear Systems 69 4.4.2. 1 Linear Theta Pinch 69 4.4.2. 2 Externally Heated Long Linear Systems S9 4.4.2. 3 Reversed-Field Mirror 70 4.4.2. 4 Dense Z-Pinch 70 4.4.3 Othar Systems 71 4.4.3. 1 Flux Compression 71 4.4.3. 2 Surface Confinement 71 4.4.4 Conclusion 71 4.5 Heating of Magnetically Confined Plasmas 72 4.5.1 Ohmic Heating 72 4.5.2 Neutral-Beam Heating 73 4.5.3 Heating by Magnetic Compression 75 4.5.4 Radiofrequency Heating 76 4.5.5 Comparison of Heating Techniques 78 4.6 Conclusions 79 5. INERTIAL CONFINEMENT - LASER BEAMS (U.S. Geiger, F.C. Khanna, 87 V.F. Sears and W. Selander) 5.1 Introduction 87 5.2 The Laser Driven Inertial Confinement Fusion Process 87 5.3 The Present Status of LICF 90 5.3.1 National Programs in LICF 90 5.3.2 Laser Facilities for LICF Studies 92 5.3.3 Experimental Status of LICF 94 5.3.4 Status of Pellet Fabrication Technology 99 5.3.5 Summary of the Present Status of LICF 100 5.4 Near-Term Outlook for LICF Studies 102 5.5 LICF Reactor Design 104 5.6 Representative Parameters for Laser Driven ICF Systems 105 5.7 Progress Status and Schedule (U.S.) 105 5.8 Concluding Remarks 107 6. INERTIAL CONFINEMENT - PARTICLE BEAMS (L.W. Funk, H.R. Andrews, HI E.D. Earle, J.A. Hulbert, and P.H.C. Lee) 6.1 Introduction 111 6.2 Common Principles 113 (111) CONTENTS (Continued) Page 6.3 Electron Beams 116 6.4 Light Ion Beams 122 6.5 Heavy Ion Beams 125 6.5.1 RF Linacs 131 6.5.2 Induction Linacs 137 6.6 Overall Assessment 139 6.7 Representative Parameters for Beam Driven ICF Systems 140 7. THE FIRST-WALL PROBLEM (D.P. Jackson) 147 7.1 Introduction 147 7.2 Mechanisms of Plasma Interaction with the Wa 1 149 7.2.1 Reflection 149 7.2.2 Reemission 150 7.2.3 Blistering 150 7.2.4 Evaporation 152 7.2.5 Sputtering 152 7.2.6 Arcing 153 7.2.7 Desorption 153 7.3 Effects of the First-Wall Behaviour on the Plasma 154 7.3.1 Recycling 155 7.3.2 Low Z Impurities 156 7.3.3 Medium to High Z Impurities 157 7.4 Summa ry 159 8. TRITIUM RECOVERY TECHNOLOGY (T.M. Holden, C.R. Hoffmann, 161 S.A. Kushneriuk and P.Y. Wong) 8.1 Introduction 161 8.2 Solid Lithium Compounds 162 8.2.1 Tightly Bound Tritium 163 8.2.2 Continuous Recovery 163 8.3 Liquid Lithium 165 8.3.1 Liquid Lithium - Molten Salt Process 165 8.3.2 Liquid Lithium Solid Yttrium Metal Getter 166 9. BREEDING BLANKET DESIGN (S.A. Kushneriuk, P.Y. Wong, 171 C.R. Hoffmann and T.M. Holden) 9.1 Introduction 171 9.2 Chalk River Blanket Evaluations 177 9.3 The Reference Breeding Blankets 181 (tv) CONTENTS (Continued) Page 10. ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT - ALLOWED CAPITAL COST 193 (C.R. Hoffmann, T.M. Holden, S.A. Kushneriuk and P.Y. Wong) 10.1 Introduction 193 10.2 Reactor Breeder Model 195 10.3 Allowed Capital Costs 200 11. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 213 (v) PREFACE This study was undertaken by the Fusion Status Study (FUSS) Group, a working group of the Physics Advanced Systems Study Committee, to assess the potential of current concepts in fusion as practical elactronuclear breeder options. As with an earlier study restricted to laser fusion (A Review of the Prospects for Laser Induced Thermonuclear Fusion, AECL-484O (1974)) the underlying objective was to establish a basis for future program direction of the AECL RC Advanced Systems program. The long term goal of that program is to keep open the option of electronuclear breeding in support of thorium advanced cycles for the CANDU reactor. While this study may impinne upon the related problem of select- ing stand-alone fusion systems suitable for Canada, no attempt is made here to identify such systems nor to address the question of what effort would be appropriate under Canada's National Fusion Program toward realization of such systems. The FUSS Membership is as follows: Members G.A. Bartholomew Study Chairman J.S. Geiger Alternate Study Chairman (vi) G.E. Lee-Whiting(C) Magnetic Confinement C.R. Hoffmann F.C. Khanna M.R. Shubaly I.S< Towner B. Uinterbon J.S. Geiger(C) Inertial Confinement, Laser F.C. Khanna V.F. Sears W. Selander L.W. Funk(C) Inertial Confinement, Particle Beams H.R. Andrews E.D. Earle J.A. Hulbert P.H.C. Lee C.R. Hoffmann(C) System Optimization and Breeding Economics T.M. Hoi den S.A. Kushneriuk P.Y. Wong Observers and Advisers G.C. Hanna G. Dolling J.S. Fraser D. McPherson JcC.D. Milton D.P. Jackson (C) - Working party chairman This study benefited from contacts which exist between members of the study group and experts in fusion, fusion breeding, and related fields. Direct consultations occurred at conferences and during visits to other laboratories. The following, scientists visited CRNL during the course of the study; A.J. Alcock A.W. Maschke M. Bachynski R. Martin R. Bol ton A.H. Morton T. Brown M.G.R. Phillips B. Gregory T. Teichmann D.L. Jassby W.B. Thompson J.D. Lee (vi 1] We are especially indebted to these people for addressing the staff on various aspects of the fusion-breeder problem and for participating in round table discussions with the FUSS group.
Recommended publications
  • OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Engineering Physics

    OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Engineering Physics

    oml ORNL-6868 OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Engineering Physics LOCK H * M D NJA Jt rim Or" and Mathematics Division ^ Progress Report for Period Ending December 31,1994 R. F. Sincovec, Director MANAGED BY LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY UCI*13673 {36 W5) This report has been reproduced directly from the ilabie copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Scientific and Techni- cal Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37> s available from (615) 576-8401, FTS 626-8401. Available to the public from the National Teci rmation Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd.,; d, VA 22161. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, com• pleteness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process dis• closed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily consti• tute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. ORNL-6868 Engineering Physics and Mathematics Division ENGINEERING PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS DIVISION PROGRESS REPORT FOR PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1994 R.
  • Historical Perspective on the United States Fusion Program

    Historical Perspective on the United States Fusion Program

    Historical Perspective on the United States Fusion Program Invited paper presented at American Nuclear Society 16th Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy 14-16 September, 2004 in Madison, WI Stephen O. Dean Fusion Power Associates, 2 Professional Drive, Suite 249, Gaithersburg, MD 20879 [email protected] A variety of methods to heat the nuclei to the Progress and Policy is traced over the approximately high speeds (kinetic energies) required to penetrate the 55 year history of the U. S. Fusion Program. The Coulomb barrier have been successfully utilized, classified beginnings of the effort in the 1950s ended with including running a high current through an ionized declassification in 1958. The effort struggled during the hydrogen gas ("ohmic heating"), accelerating beams of 1960s, but ended on a positive note with the emergence of nuclei, and using radio-frequency power. Temperatures the tokamak and the promise of laser fusion. The decade well in excess of the 50 million degrees needed for fusion of the 1970s was the “Golden Age” of fusion, with large are now routinely achieved. budget increases and the construction of many new facilities, including the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor II. THE 1960s AND 1970s (TFTR) and the Shiva laser. The decade ended on a high note with the passage of the Magnetic Fusion Energy During the decade of the 1960s, and continuing Engineering Act of 1980, overwhelming approved by to the present, scientists developed a whole new branch of Congress and signed by President Carter. The Act called physics, called plasma physics [3], to describe the for a “$20 billion, 20-year” effort aimed at construction behavior of these plasmas in various magnetic of a fusion Demonstration Power Plant around the end of configurations, and sophisticated theories, models and the century.
  • Article Thermonuclear Bomb 5 7 12

    Article Thermonuclear Bomb 5 7 12

    1 Inexpensive Mini Thermonuclear Reactor By Alexander Bolonkin [email protected] New York, April 2012 2 Article Thermonuclear Reactor 1 26 13 Inexpensive Mini Thermonuclear Reactor By Alexander Bolonkin C&R Co., [email protected] Abstract This proposed design for a mini thermonuclear reactor uses a method based upon a series of important innovations. A cumulative explosion presses a capsule with nuclear fuel up to 100 thousands of atmospheres, the explosive electric generator heats the capsule/pellet up to 100 million degrees and a special capsule and a special cover which keeps these pressure and temperature in capsule up to 0.001 sec. which is sufficient for Lawson criteria for ignition of thermonuclear fuel. Major advantages of these reactors/bombs is its very low cost, dimension, weight and easy production, which does not require a complex industry. The mini thermonuclear bomb can be delivered as a shell by conventional gun (from 155 mm), small civil aircraft, boat or even by an individual. The same method may be used for thermonuclear engine for electric energy plants, ships, aircrafts, tracks and rockets. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Key words: Thermonuclear mini bomb, thermonuclear reactor, nuclear energy, nuclear engine, nuclear space propulsion. Introduction It is common knowledge that thermonuclear bombs are extremely powerful but very expensive and difficult to produce as it requires a conventional nuclear bomb for ignition. In stark contrast, the Mini Thermonuclear Bomb is very inexpensive. Moreover, in contrast to conventional dangerous radioactive or neutron bombs which generates enormous power, the Mini Thermonuclear Bomb does not have gamma or neutron radiation which, in effect, makes it a ―clean‖ bomb having only the flash and shock wave of a conventional explosive but much more powerful (from 1 ton of TNT and more, for example 100 tons).
  • Nova Laser Technology

    Nova Laser Technology

    Nova Laser Technology In building the Nova laser, we have significantly advanced many technologies, including the generation and propagation of laser beams. We have also developed innovations in the fields of alignment, diagnostics, computer control, and image processIng.• For further information contact Nova is the world's most powerful at least 10 to 30 times more energetic John F. Holzrichter (415) 423-7454. laser system. It is designed to heat and than Shiva would be needed to compress small targets, typically 0.1 cm investigate ignition conditions and in size, to conditions otherwise produced possibly to reach gains near unity. only in nuclear weapons or in the Because of the importance of such a interior of stars. Its beams can facility to the progress of inertial fusion concentrate 80 to 120 kJ of energy (in research and because of the construction 3 ns) or 80 to 120 TW of power (in time entailed (at least five to seven 100 ps) on such targets. To couple energy years), the Nova project was proposed to more favorably with the target, Nova's the Energy Research and Development laser light will be harmonically converted Administration and to Congress. It was with greater than 50% efficiency from its decided to base this system on the near-infrared fundamental wavelength proven master-oscillator, linear-amplifier­ (1.05-,um wavelength) to green (0.525- chain laser system used on the Argus ,um) or blue (0.35-,um) wavelengths. The and Shiva systems. We had great goals of our experiments with Nova are confidence in extending this to make accurate measurements of high­ neodymium-glass laser technology to the temperature and high-pressure states of 200- to 300-kJ level.
  • 1 Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research Association Euratom-CEA, Centre De

    1 Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research Association Euratom-CEA, Centre De

    Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research P. STOTT Association Euratom-CEA, Centre de Cadarache, 13108 Saint Paul lez Durance, France. This article gives a short overview of the origins of nuclear fusion and of its development as a potential source of terrestrial energy. 1 Introduction A hundred years ago, at the dawn of the twentieth century, physicists did not understand the source of the Sun‘s energy. Although classical physics had made major advances during the nineteenth century and many people thought that there was little of the physical sciences left to be discovered, they could not explain how the Sun could continue to radiate energy, apparently indefinitely. The law of energy conservation required that there must be an internal energy source equal to that radiated from the Sun‘s surface but the only substantial sources of energy known at that time were wood or coal. The mass of the Sun and the rate at which it radiated energy were known and it was easy to show that if the Sun had started off as a solid lump of coal it would have burnt out in a few thousand years. It was clear that this was much too shortœœthe Sun had to be older than the Earth and, although there was much controversy about the age of the Earth, it was clear that it had to be older than a few thousand years. The realization that the source of energy in the Sun and stars is due to nuclear fusion followed three main steps in the development of science.
  • ENGINEERING DESIGN of the NOVA LASER FACILITY for By

    ENGINEERING DESIGN of the NOVA LASER FACILITY for By

    ENGINEERING DESIGN OF THE NOVA LASER FACILITY FOR INERTIAL-CONFINEMENT FUSION* by W. W. Simmons, R. 0. Godwin, C. A. Hurley, E. P. Wallerstein, K. Whitham, J. E. Murray, E. S. Bliss, R. G. Ozarski. M. A. Summers, F. Rienecker, D. G. Gritton, F. W. Holloway, G. J. Suski, J. R. Severyn, and the Nova Engineering Team. Abstract The design of the Nova Laser Facility for inertia! confinement fusion experiments at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is presented from an engineering perspective. Emphasis is placed upon design-to- performance requirements as they impact the various subsystems that comprise this complex experimental facility. - DISCLAIMER - CO;.T-CI104n--17D DEf;2 013.375 *Research performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract number W-7405-ENG-48. Foreword The Nova Laser System for Inertial Confinement Fusion studies at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories represents a sophisticated engineering challenge to the national scientific and industrial community, embodying many disciplines - optical, mechanical, power and controls engineering for examples - employing state-of-the-art components and techniques. The papers collected here form a systematic, comprehensive presentation of the system engineering involved in the design, construction and operation of the Nova Facility, presently under construction at LLNL and scheduled for first operations in 1985. The 1st and 2nd Chapters present laser design and performance, as well as an introductory overview of the entire system; Chapters 3, 4 and 5 describe the major engineering subsystems; Chapters 6, 7, 8 and 9 document laser and target systems technology, including optical harmonic frequency conversion, its ramifications, and its impact upon other subsystems; and Chapters 10, 11, and 12 present an extensive discussion of our integrated approach to command, control and communications for the entire system.
  • Nuclear Weapons Databook

    Nuclear Weapons Databook

    Nuclear Weapons Databook Volume I11 U.S. Nuclear Warhead Facility Profiles Nuclear Weapons Databook Volume I11 U.S. Nuclear Warhead Facility Profiles Thomas B. Cochran, William M. Arkin, Robert S. Morris, and Milton M. Hoenig A book by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. BALUNGER PUBLISHING COMPANY Cambridge, Massachusetts A Subsidiary of Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. Copyright a 1987 by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or trans- mitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the publisher. International Standard Book Number: 0-88730-126-6 (CL) 0-88730-146-0 (PB) Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 82-24376 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress CataloGng-iii-PublicationData U.S. nuclear warhead facility profiles. (Nuclear weapons databook ;v. 3) "A book by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc." Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Nuclear weapons-United States. 2. Munitions-United States. I. Cochran, Thomas B. 11. Natural Resources Defense Council. 111. Title: US nuclear warhead facility profiles. IV. Title: United States nuclear warhead facility profiles. V. Series: Cochran, Thomas B. Nuclear weapons databook ;v. 3. U264.C6 1984 vol. 3 355.8'25119'0973 87-14552 [U264] ISBN 0-88410-172-X (v. 1) ISBN 0-88410-173-8 (pbk. : v. 1) ISBN 0-88730-124-X (v. 2) ISBN 0-88730-125-8 (pbk. : v. 2) ISBN 0-88730-126-6 (v. 3) ISBN 0-88730-146-0 (pbk.
  • Lasers Join the Quest for Fusion Energy

    Lasers Join the Quest for Fusion Energy

    1974 Lasers and ICF Lasers Join the Quest to gain a better understanding of laser plasma physics and thermonuclear physics and to demonstrate for Fusion Energy laser-induced compression and thermonuclear burn of deuterium–tritium. It was also used to improve the LASNEX computer code developed for laser With the goal of achieving energy gain fusion predictions. Janus was just the In 1975, the one-beam Cyclops laser through inertial confinement fusion beginning of the development, in quick began operation, performing important (ICF) as its mission, the Laser Program succession, of a series of lasers, each target experiments and testing optical constructed its first laser for ICF building on the knowledge gained from designs for future lasers. The next year, experiments in 1974. Named Janus, the last, leading to the National Ignition the two-beam Argus was built. Use of the two-beam laser was built with about Facility (NIF), currently performing Argus increased knowledge about laser– 100 pounds of laser glass. experiments. The pace of laser target interactions and laser propagation The first Livermore laser for construction matched the growth limits, and it helped the ICF program prepared the Laboratory to take the With the 20-beam ICF research, Janus, had Under the leadership of John Emmett, in ICF diagnostics capabilities, develop technologies needed for the next major step, construction of the Shiva laser in 1977, the two beams and produced who headed the Laser Program from computer simulation tools, and next generation of laser fusion systems. 192-beam NIF (see Year 1997), where Laboratory established 10 joules of energy.
  • Starpower: the US and the International Quest for Fusion Energy

    Starpower: the US and the International Quest for Fusion Energy

    Appendix B Other Approaches to Fusion The main body of this report has discussed magnetic The issues addressed by inertial confinement fusion confinement fusion, the approach to controlled fusion research in the United States concern the individual that the worldwide programs emphasize most heav- targets containing the fusion fuel; the input energy ily. However, two other approaches to fusion are also sources, called drivers, that heat and compress these being investigated. All three approaches are based on targets; and the mechanism by which energy from the the same fundamental physical process, in which the driver is delivered–or coupled–into the target. Due nuclei of light isotopes, typically deuterium and tri- to the close relationship between inertial confinement tium, release energy by fusing together to form heav- fusion target design and thermonuclear weapon de- ier isotopes. Some of the technical issues are similar sign, inertial confinement fusion research is funded among all the fusion approaches, such as mechanisms by the nuclear weapons activities portion of the De- for recovering energy and breeding tritium fuel. How- partment of Energy’s (DOE’s) budget. Inertial confine- ever, compared to magnetic confinement, the two ap- ment research is conducted largely at nuclear weap- proaches discussed below create the conditions nec- ons laboratories; its near-term goals are dedicated essary for fusion to occur in very different ways, and largely to military, rather than energy applications, and some substantially different science and technology a substantial portion of this research is classified. issues emerge in each case. There are two near-term military applications of in- ertial confinement fusion—one actual and one not yet Inertial Confinement Fusion1 realized.
  • Fusion-The-Energy-Of-The-Universe

    Fusion-The-Energy-Of-The-Universe

    Fusion The Energy of the Universe WHAT IS THE COMPLEMENTARY SCIENCE SERIES? We hope you enjoy this book. If you would like to read other quality science books with a similar orientation see the order form and reproductions of the front and back covers of other books in the series at the end of this book. The Complementary Science Series is an introductory, interdisciplinary, and relatively inexpensive series of paperbacks for science enthusiasts. The series covers core subjects in chemistry, physics, and biological sciences but often from an interdisciplinary perspective. They are deliberately unburdened by excessive pedagogy, which is distracting to many readers, and avoid the often plodding treatment in many textbooks. These titles cover topics that are particularly appropriate for self-study although they are often used as complementary texts to supplement standard discussion in textbooks. Many are available as examination copies to professors teaching appropriate courses. The series was conceived to fill the gaps in the literature between conventional textbooks and monographs by providing real science at an accessible level, with minimal prerequisites so that students at all stages can have expert insight into important and foundational aspects of current scientific thinking. Many of these titles have strong interdisciplinary appeal and all have a place on the bookshelves of literate laypersons. Potentialauthorsareinvitedtocontactoureditorialoffice: [email protected]. Feedback on the titles is welcome. Titles in the Complementary Science Series are detailed at the end of these pages. A 15% discount is available (to owners of this edition) on other books in this series—see order form at the back of this book.
  • 1 Distant Nuclear Fusion 1. Introduction 2. ITER

    1 Distant Nuclear Fusion 1. Introduction 2. ITER

    Distant Nuclear Fusion By John Benson January 2021 1. Introduction When we look up at night and view the stars, everything we see is shining because of distant nuclear fusion. — Carl Sagan, Cosmos (1980, p. 238) I have been posting papers to Energy Central since 2017, and weekly posts since 2018. During this time, I have occasionally come across a subject and considered writing a post on it. The reason I haven’t is because, even though it is an advanced technology for producing energy, it will not produce any usable electric power for decades. There are currently two experiments that are designed to reach “break-even” fusion within the next several years, but this means that the experiment will inject as much energy into the inner, or core process as comes out in the form of high energy neutrons. Forget any energy-conversion efficiencies outside of the core – no electric energy will come out of these initial facilities in spite of huge amounts going in. One of these two projects, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is in Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France. The other, the National Ignition Facility (NIF) is here in my home town of Livermore, California. ITER is scheduled to turn on in 2025, and reach full power by 2035. NEF has been running for over a decade. ITER cost $25 billion. The cost of NIF is a bit difficult to parse. The official cost is $3.5 billion, but there were several earlier experiments that led up to NIF, and NIF has been expanded and modified since it was commissioned in 2009.
  • Simulation of a High Speed Counting System for Sic Neutron

    Simulation of a High Speed Counting System for Sic Neutron

    Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting Jeju, Korea, May 17-18, 2018 Analysis of Technical Issues for Development of Fusion-Fission Hybrid Reactor (FFHR) Doo-Hee Chang Nuclear Fusion Technology Development Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Korea *Corresponding author: [email protected] 1. Introduction • ~100 tokamaks in the worldwide since 1957 • Physics performance parameters achieved at or near The nuclear fission reactors remain public concerns lower limit of reactor relevance about the safety, waste and decommissioning • Large, world‐wide physics and technology (afterwards) that they produce. The most optimistic programs supporting ITER (initial operation in assessment predicts that fusion technology will not be 2025, but possible delay again) able to produce electricity on a commercial scale for at • ITER will achieve reactor‐relevant physics and least another four decades. There is a third nuclear technology parameters simultaneously, produce option led to a resurgence of interest, which combines 500 MWth and investigate very long‐pulse the aspects of fission and fusion technologies in the operation form of the fusion-fission hybrid reactor (FFHR) [1]. An (b) Many other confinement concepts (e.g. mirror, FFHR is a fusion reactor surrounded by a fission bumpy torus) have fallen by the wayside or remain blanket, containing the thorium, uranium, and on the backburner transuranic (TRU) elements, to increase output power, (c) A few other confinement concepts (e.g. stellarator, to breed