DOCSLIB.ORG

Overview and Scrutiny: Waste Task and Finish Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Overview and Scrutiny: Waste Task and Finish Group Democratic Services Overview and Scrutiny: Waste Task and Finish Group Wednesday, 26 October 2016 18:00 Milton Keynes Waste Recovery Park, 9 Dickens Road, Old Wolverton, MK12 5QF McCall (Chair) Hopkins Hosking McPake Petchey and Webb If you have any enquires about this agenda please contact: Clerk Name: Dwight McKenzie Page 1 of 64 Clerk Telephone: 01908 252177 Clerk Email: [email protected] Page 2 of 64 Health and Safety Please take a few moments to familiarise yourself with the nearest available fire exit, indicated by the fire evacuation signs. In the event of an alarm sounding during the meeting you must evacuate the building immediately and follow all instructions provided by the fire evacuation officer who will identify him/herself should the alarm sound. You will be assisted to the nearest designated assembly point until it is safe to return to the building. Mobile Phones Please ensure that your mobile phone is switched to silent or is switched off completely during the meeting. Agenda Agendas and reports for the majority of the Council’s public meetings can be accessed via the Internet at: http://milton-keynes.cmis.uk.com/milton-keynes/ Wi Fi access is available in the Council’s meeting rooms. Users of Windows 7 and above can simply click the link to any documents you wish to see. Users of Windows XP will need to right click on the link and select ‘open in browser’. Recording of Meetings The proceedings at this meeting may be recorded for the purpose of preparing the minutes of the meeting. In accordance with the Openness of Local Government Bodies Regulations 2014, you can film, photograph, record or use social media at any Council meetings that are open to the public. If you are reporting the proceedings, please respect other members of the public at the meeting who do not want to be filmed. You should also not conduct the reporting so that it disrupts the good order and conduct of the meeting. While you do not need permission, you can contact the Council’s staff in advance of the meeting to discuss facilities for reporting the proceedings and a contact is included on the front of the agenda, or you can liaise with staff at the meeting. Guidance from the Department for Communities and local government can be viewed at the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/34318 2/140812_Openness_Guide.pdf Comments, Complaints and Compliments Milton Keynes Council welcomes comments, complaints and compliments from members of the public in order to make its services as efficient and effective as possible. We would appreciate any suggestions regarding the usefulness of the paperwork for this meeting, or the conduct of the meeting you have attended. Please e-mail your comments to [email protected] If you require a response please leave contact details, ideally including an e-mail address. A formal complaints / compliments form is available online at http://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/complaints/ Page 3 of 64 A G E N D A 1 Welcome and Introductions The Chair to welcome Members and officers to the meeting and introduce Members and officers who are present. 2 Apologies 3 Disclosures of Interest Councillors to declare any disclosable pecuniary interests, or personal interests (including other pecuniary interests) they may have in the business to be transacted, and officers to declare any interests they may have in any contract to be considered. 4 Minutes 7 - 12 To approve, and the Chair to sign as a correct record, the Notes of the meeting held on 28 September 2016 (Item 4) 5 Site Tour Members to be given a tour of the Milton Keynes Waste Residual Waste Treatment Facility (Item 5) by Waste Service officers 6 Report - Review of Future Trends/Demand Predictability 13 - 64 (What Will Waste Look Like in 5 years), and What Happens Elsewhere in Waste Service Management such as with other Local Authorities To consider trends and demand for waste services in the future, and local authority practices in waste service management and provision (Item 6) 7 Notice of Intention to Hold the Meeting in Private The public and press may be excluded from the remainder of the meeting by virtue of Paragraph 3 (Information Relating to the Financial or Business Affairs of the Authority) of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972, in order that the meeting may consider the following: Annex 14 of Item 6 The Proper Officer of the Council has determined that the annex should be considered in the absence of the public and press as disclosure would not be in the public interest. No representations have been received about why those matters referred to above should be considered with the public and press present. 8 Exclusion of Public and Press To consider excluding the publicPage and4 of press64 from the meeting by virtue of Paragraph 3 (Information Relating to the Financial or Business Affairs of the Authority) of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972, in order that the meeting may consider the following: Annex 14 of Item 6 9 Proposed Work Programme • November 2016- Review of shortlist with the varied options/pilots considered in development of the new Waste Strategy broken down into costs, benefits, medium term financial plans/projections. • December 2016- Review of Strategy direction based on evidence gathered and particular option(s) chosen. Page 5 of 64 Page 6 of 64 ITEM 4 Notes of the Waste Strategy Task and Finish Group meeting held on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 Present: Councillors D McCall, D Hopkins, V McPake, and M Petchey Officers: D McKenzie (Overview and Scrutiny Officer) A Hudson (Head- Environment and Waste) D Proctor (Waste Contracts Manager) D Carr (Operational Customer Service Manager) Apologies: Councillors D Hosking and A Webb Welcome & Introductions Councillor D McCall welcomed Members and officers to the meeting. Disclosure of Interest None Minutes The Minutes of the meeting of the Task and Finish Group held on 6 September was approved with the below amendments: - Page 3 “Serco has the existing contract for the Council’s collection, cleansing and grounds maintenance” replace “Serco has the existing contract for the management of waste”. “Serco has the existing contract for the Council’s management of waste” replace “This contract is also currently up for renewal and the contractor’s performance will be reviewed by the service” Page 4 “Members” be added to Community views to be taken into account. Scoping Document Page 4 “Development of the Strategy will also incorporate any potential for the Council to sell waste services to other local authorities so as to generate income” be added to the Background. Page 6 “Review of the Council’s potential capacity to sell waste services to other local authorities and generate income” be added to the Proposed Terms of Reference. Page 7 of 64 1 Report- What customers want and think of waste services (Evidence of a pilot and satisfaction surveys) The Chair outlined that the focus of this meeting was to identify what customers in Milton Keynes wanted of waste services. Also outlined was that data possessed and provided by the Council’s waste service contractor; Serco, Customer Services and feedback from a pilot would be useful in the meeting’s discussion. Dwight McKenzie introduced the Report, and provided Members with a broad overview of its contents. He pointed out:- Achieving customer satisfaction in waste service provision had always been important to the Council as evidenced by the Zero Waste Strategy Refresh 2013. Waste service provision was strongly guided by legislation, and development of a new Waste Strategy should help in ensuring that the Council’s actions are in keeping with legislative changes and developments. Following this overview, Members queried of officers whether waste was separated upon collection as required by the Waste (England and Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2012. Particular concern was raised as regards the collection of glass items. Officers informed that the regulation obliged this to be done by the Council when it was technically and economically practical (TEP). In applying the TEP test, the Council was meeting its legal obligations in waste collection. Members were also informed that to make possible the easier separation of waste, waste service providers had together launched a campaign for waste recycling which encourages the public to recycle items, including separating items being disposed. RESOLVED: That the Waste Service’s separation of waste when collected be monitored by the Council. Members also queried whether legislation guiding waste collection was underpinned by Europe Union (EU) regulations and the potential impact of Brexit on the current and future mode of operation for the Waste Service. Officers advised that UK legislation for waste recycling was influenced by many EU regulations and laws which the government would have to unpick in going forward with Brexit. However, as the UK was currently a member of the EU, the Waste Service would remain guided by current legislation and its underpinnings. Members asked of officers for an explanation of the apparent contradiction in the use of pink sacks in the Report. It was pointed out that page 18 of the Report had indicated households were not putting out pink sacks and instead putting out many black sacks, whereas on page 19 of the Report reference was made to a “decline in the number of black sacks put out” in the pilot. Officers explained that their efforts in encouraging recycling was not restricted to the use of pink sacks, and so other things such as the use of green bins was also taken into account in reporting household behaviour and whether there was a decrease or increase in recycling rates.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How to Avoid Another Plaster on a Wooden Leg
    HOW TO AVOID ANOTHER PLASTER ON A WOODEN LEG PUBLIC INQUIRY TESTMONY Exhibition Hall Kingsley Village Penhale Fraddon MARCH-APRIL-MAY 2010 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Appeal by SITA CORNWALL LTD against the decision of the former Cornwall County Council (now Cornwall Council) to refuse Planning Permission for the erection of an Energy-from-Waste plant and ancillary development, including a bottom ash facility, bulking up facility, chimney stack, administrative and visitor facilities, gatehouse and weighbridge, vehicle efuelling area, cooling units, parking and circulation areas, security fencing, drainage and landscape woks, pipework for heat transfer to existing china clay dryers, and other ancillary works, togetther with site access road, private haul road and bridged river crossing, junctions with the existing public highway and diversion of footpath at Rostowrack Farm and land at Wheal Remfry, and Goosevean and Parkadillick dryers, Saint Dennis, Saint Austell Cornwall (Cf. Procedural Note : 14 JANUARY 2010 APPEAL REF : APP/D0840/A/09/2113075) RESEARCHER : PAUL MATTHEWS courriel : [email protected] CERC - PREAMBLE TO A HEAVY METAL AND DIOXIN READERS DIGEST “It is a popular misconception that the weight and volume of the raw waste are reduced during incineration. It is often quoted that the volume of waste is reduced by about 90% during incineration. Even if only the residual ashes are considered, however, the actual figure is closer to 45%. The weight of waste is supposedly reduced to about one third during incineration. However this once again refers only to ashes and ignores other incineration emissions in the form of gases, which result in an increased output in weight.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire County Council Page 1 of 150
    Gloucestershire County Council Page 1 of 150 Gloucestershire County Council Page 2 of 150 Abbreviations and Glossary AD Anaerobic Digestion. A process where biodegradable material is encouraged to break down in the absence of oxygen. Material is placed in to an enclosed vessel and in controlled conditions the waste breaks down typically into a digestate, liquor and biogas. AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. ATT Advanced Thermal Treatment. Waste treatment technologies that involve the heating of waste in a reduced oxygen environment to produce a combination of char, synthetic gas and oils that can be used as fuel. These technologies include Pyrolysis and Gasification. Autoclave Autoclave is a form of mechanical heat treatment where waste is subjected to steam under pressure. Generally this process is followed by mechanical sorting and separation of the sterilised waste. The autoclave process produces cleaned glass and metal that is unchanged and that can be recovered. Plastics form mixed lumps/pellets that can be recovered easily and organics form consistent fibres/floc material. BaFO Best and Final Offer. Base The Base Payment is payment calculated on a rate per tonne which is Payment applied to the total tonnage of waste accepted by the contractor in a contract year. BMW Biodegradable Municipal Waste. The component of Municipal Solid Waste capable of being degraded by plants and animals. Biodegradable Municipal Waste includes paper and card, food and garden waste, and a proportion of other wastes, such as textiles. Bottom Ash The ash that arises from a combustion process in a furnace. BRE Building Research Establishment. BREEAM Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Together Building a Successful Joint Venture Company Contents
    ALTERNATIVE SERVICE DELIVERY MODELS IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT Better together Building a successful joint venture company Contents Executive summary 1 Deciding to set up a JV 6 Setting up the JV 16 Making the JV successful 23 About us 29 Executive summary Local government is continuing to innovate and change as it looks for ways to protect front line services. The changes are picking up pace as more local government bodies innovate by introducing alternative delivery models to generate additional income and save costs. While these new models are not a There are well-publicised cautionary solution by themselves they do add to tales of public-private JVs that have Overall, JVs remain a viable ADM for local authorities. We have set the wider solutions being explored by attracted attention and debate; some out below our insight, based on our local government such as devolution, have ended earlier than planned research, that councils may wish to or have not delivered the intended collaboration and integration. take into account when setting up benefits. While this can detract from In September 2014 we published their own JVs. our first report on alternative delivery their potential as a viable model, many models (ADMs), ‘Responding to the councils are continuing to use this Our research indicates that the number of JVs will continue to rise, in challenge’, which examined a variety type of JV because they recognise that particular public-public partnerships of models that local councils were experienced commercial partners bring cost effective solutions. We agree with as proven models are replicated. JVs looking at to tackle the financial offer great opportunities for savings this, but only if the JV moves away challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Waste Management Facilities: a Research Study Issues Arising from the Provision of Waste Management Facilities
    The report is the product of an in-depth consideration of the planning Study Management Facilities: A Research Planning for Waste ODPM issues arising from the provision of waste management facilities. A wide consultation with professionals and operators in the field was carried out for this study which focuses on site-level planning. It sets out the research team's views on the planning considerations raised by a broad range of waste management facilities and identifies the information likely to be required by planning authorities in determining planning applications. The report provides profiles for each type of waste management facility, including a scoping matrix to facilitate the identification of potential impacts. Planning for Waste Management Facilities A Research Study ISBN 1-85112-714-3 ISBN 1 85112 714 3 £18 9 781851 127146 Planning for Waste Management Facilities: A Research Study August 2004 Enviros Consulting Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: London The findings and recommendations in this report are those of the consultant authors and do not necessarily represent the views or proposed policies of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Following the reorganisation of the government in May 2002, the responsibilities of the former Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) and latterly Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR) in this area were transferred to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone 020 7944 4400 Web site www.odpm.gov.uk © Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2004 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown.
    [Show full text]
  • Annualreport & Accounts
    annual report & accounts 06 PENNON GROUP PLC OPERATES AND INVESTS IN THE AREAS OF WATER AND SEWERAGE SERVICES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT. IT HAS ASSETS OF £2.7 BILLION AND EMPLOYS AROUND 3,000 PEOPLE. There are two main subsidiaries – South West Water Limited and Viridor Waste Limited. South West Water Limited holds the water and sewerage appointments for Devon, Cornwall and parts of Dorset and Somerset. Viridor Waste Limited is one of the leading waste treatment and disposal businesses in the United Kingdom. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE YEAR REVENUE UP 17.1% TO £645.7 MILLION OPERATING PROFIT UP 16.0% TO £175.1 MILLION(1) PROFIT BEFORE TAX UP 24.6% TO £110.9 MILLION(2) EARNINGS PER SHARE UP 17.4% TO 75.5p(3) DIVIDEND PER SHARE UP 20.0% TO 51.6p (1) Before exceptional items of £14.5 million (2004/05 £4.9 million). Statutory result £160.6 million (2004/05 £146.0 million) (2) Before exceptional items of £56.8 million (2004/05 £4.9 million). Statutory result £54.1 million (2004/05 £84.1 million) (3) Before exceptional items and deferred tax. Basic earnings per share are 29.7p CONTENTS Chairman’s statement . 2 Chief Executives’ overviews . 4 Business review . 8 Board of Directors . 28 Directors’ remuneration report . 29 Corporate governance and internal control . 36 Directors’ report . 39 Independent auditors’ report on Group financial statements . 41 Group financial statements . 42 Explanation of transition to International Financial Reporting Standards . 84 Five year financial summary . 92 Independent auditors’ report on Pennon Group Plc financial statements . 93 Pennon Group Plc financial statements .
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Waste Growth at Local Authority Level FINAL REPORT ADDENDUM
    Resource Futures WRO121 – Understanding Waste Growth at Local Authority Level FINAL REPORT ADDENDUM RF Project no: 506 Resource Futures WRO121 – Understanding Waste Growth at Local Authority Level ADDENDUM Prepared for Defra Client Project no: WR0121 RF project no: 506 October 2009 Resource Futures Create Centre, Smeaton Road, Bristol, BS16XN Tel: 0117 930 4355 www.resourcefutures.co.uk Quality control sheet RF 506 Report prepared for: Waste and Resources Evidence Programme Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Area 5D Ergon House Horseferry Road London SW1P 2AP Report prepared by: Ashley Robb and Dr Julian Parfitt and Ashley Robb Director and Principal Consultant Resource Futures First Floor Royal House 28 Sovereign Street Leeds LS1 4BJ E-mail: [email protected] Report approved by: Dr Julian Parfitt Research and Technical Director File name: WR0121 addendum FINAL Version: FINAL Date: October 2009 Contents 1. Addendum ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Case Study 1: Ribble Valley Borough Council ................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Local authority profile .................................................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Waste collection arrangements ................................................................................... 1 1.1.3 Summary of waste trends...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 74Bed764-59F1-4A11-Acf6-B5887a093dd0 Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2008 WorldReginfo - 74bed764-59f1-4a11-acf6-b5887a093dd0 Contents Financial highlights and Group strategy ................................................1 Directors’ report Business review: Chairman’s statement........................................................................2 South West Water: Overview....................................................................................................4 Regulatory and competitive environment...............................7 Key Performance Indicators .........................................................10 Customers, community and employees..................................13 Key relationships ...............................................................................14 Risks and uncertainties ..................................................................14 Viridor: Overview.................................................................................................16 Key Performance Indicators .........................................................19 Main trends...........................................................................................20 Business and strategy .....................................................................20 Regulatory and competitive environment ............................22 Corporate responsibility/relationships..................................24 Risks and uncertainties ..................................................................24 Pennon Group: Key Performance Indicators .........................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • ND136 Planning for Waste Management Facilities
    The report is the product of an in-depth consideration of the planning Study Management Facilities: A Research Planning for Waste ODPM issues arising from the provision of waste management facilities. A wide consultation with professionals and operators in the field was carried out for this study which focuses on site-level planning. It sets out the research team's views on the planning considerations raised by a broad range of waste management facilities and identifies the information likely to be required by planning authorities in determining planning applications. The report provides profiles for each type of waste management facility, including a scoping matrix to facilitate the identification of potential impacts. Planning for Waste Management Facilities A Research Study ISBN 1-85112-714-3 ISBN 1 85112 714 3 £18 9 781851 127146 Planning for Waste Management Facilities: A Research Study August 2004 Enviros Consulting Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: London The findings and recommendations in this report are those of the consultant authors and do not necessarily represent the views or proposed policies of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Following the reorganisation of the government in May 2002, the responsibilities of the former Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) and latterly Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR) in this area were transferred to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone 020 7944 4400 Web site www.odpm.gov.uk © Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2004 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown.
    [Show full text]
  • The List of Waste (Wales) Regulations 2005
    REGULATORY APPRAISAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, WALES THE LIST OF WASTES (WALES) REGULATIONS 2005 Background 1. Hazardous waste is essentially waste that contains hazardous properties that may render it harmful to human health or the environment. Given the risks that it may pose to human health and the environment it is especially important that hazardous waste is managed properly. At present there are around five million tonnes of special1 waste generated annually in England and Wales, and around 500,000 consignments of this waste. The Hazardous Waste Directive sets out provisions to ensure the controlled management of such waste, and is transposed and implemented in Great Britain through the Special Waste Regulations 1996. 2. The scope of the Directive is defined by the Hazardous Waste List. This list was revised, and incorporated into the European Waste Catalogue in 2000, with the changes taking effect on 1 January 2002. The UK Government is obliged to transpose the revised list into UK law. In Wales this will be done through the List of Wastes (Wales) Regulations 2005. 3. The List of Wastes (Wales) Regulations 2005 contain nothing other than a revision of the hazardous wastes list covered by the hazardous waste Directive and are to be read in conjunction with the Hazardous Waste (Wales) Regulations 2005. Implementing the revised Hazardous Waste List 4. The revision of the Hazardous Waste List has resulted in an expanded list of wastes now classified as hazardous within the EU. While more than 200 additional waste streams have been added to the list many of these are already controlled as hazardous wastes within Great Britain, through the Special Waste Regulations, because of their hazardous properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report 2005
    INTERIM REPORT 2005 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS I Operating profit up 14.8% to £93.7 million* – up 15.4% to £77.8 million – up 15.1% to £16.8 million before amortisation of intangibles I Profit before tax up 21.6% to £60.8 million* I Earnings per share (before deferred tax) up 13.5% to 41.3p* * Before exceptional item in 2004/05 of £2.0 million for costs incurred relating to abortive acquisition in 2003/04. PROPOSED RETURN OF CAPITAL AND DIVIDEND POLICY I Proposed capital return of £200 million through: I B Share scheme of approximately £145 million, equivalent to 110p per share – with income or capital alternatives – associated ordinary share consolidation I Share buyback of approximately £55 million I Proposed rebased dividend per share post consolidation I 20% increase in full year dividend per share reflected in: – 20% increase in interim dividend per share to 16.5p – 3% per annum real dividend increases thereafter until 2009/10 I £20 per South West Water customer one-off payment from balance sheet restructuring PENNON GROUP PLC OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS I Delivery under way of 2005 – 2010 regulatory contract I Profit increase reflecting strong growth in Regulatory Asset Value (RAV) in 2005 I Length of water mains renovated up 17% I Highest increase in Overall Performance Assessment (OPA) score of any of the water and sewerage companies in England and Wales in 2004/05 I Record 2005 bathing water compliance I Continued strong growth in profits, particularly from landfill and power generation I Brett Waste acquired in June 2005 – now successfully
    [Show full text]
  • Flintshire County Council Waste Management Strategy 2009–2025
    Flintshire County Council Waste Management Strategy 2009–2025 November 2009 Flintshire County Council Waste Management Strategy 2009–2025 January 2010 Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 | Purpose & Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 | Flintshire’s commitments ........................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 | Flintshire Profile ......................................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 | Flintshire Collection Service ...................................................................................................................... 8 5.0 | Achievements & performance ................................................................................................................. 11 6.0 | Effecting Change ..................................................................................................................................... 14 7.0 | Delivering and Reviewing the Strategy.................................................................................................... 20 Glossary..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Incineration Campaign Guide the Incineration Campaign Guide
    The Incineration Campaign Guide The Incineration Campaign Guide Introduction 1 Section 1 - Campaigning 7 Section 2 - Overview of Incineration Campaigns 11 Section 3 - Incineration Policies 15 Section 4 - The Environmental Problems of Waste Incineration 21 Section 5 - Campaigning on Waste Plans 29 Section 6 - Establishing the Facts About a Proposal 39 Section 7 - Who Gives Planning Permission? 43 Section 8 - Objecting to the PlanningApplication 49 Section 9 - The Local Planning Authority and How to Lobby Them 63 Section 10 - Who Gives Incinerators Licences to Operate ? 69 Section 11 - Campaigning Against the Licence Application 73 Section 12 - The Environmental Statement 77 Section 13 - Campaign Case Histories 83 Section 14 - Northern Ireland - Planning and Waste Disposal Licensing 91 Annexes 1. The Arguments 95 2. Air Pollution and Health 99 3. Municipal Waste Incinerator Emission Limits (to Air) 104 4. Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases 107 5. Some Planning Decisions 117 6. How Incinerators Work 125 7. Reading List 129 8. Abbreviations and Units 135 Appendices 1. Don’t Burn it or Bury it - alternatives to landfill and incineration 2. Up in Smoke...why Friends of the Earth opposes incineration. Friends of the Earth’s Incineration Campaign Guide, December 1997 Introduction This introduction explains C why Friends of the Earth has produced this guide C how the guide can best be used C why there are separate references to Northern Ireland. Here we present a summary of our arguments, some ideas for finding your way around this book, and an overview of each separate section. Why an incinerator campaign guide? C Incinerators rely on landfill sites to dispose of Incinerators present serious environmental threats.
    [Show full text]