Natural Disaster Incidents Overview
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Afghanistan: Extreme Weather Regional Overview (As of 11 March 2015)
Afghanistan: Extreme Weather Regional Overview (as of 11 March 2015) Key Highlights: Since 1 February 2015, an estimated 6,181 families have been affected by floods, rain, heavy snow and avalanches in 120 districts in 22 provinces. A total of 224 people were killed and 74 people1 were injured. 1,381 houses were completely destroyed and 4,632 houses were damaged2. The government has declared a phase out of the emergency response in Panjsher. 160 families were reportedly displaced by heavy snowfall in four districts of Faryab province. 300 families are at risk of possible landslides in Kaledi Qashlaq village of Shal district in Takhar province. Meetings and Coordination: National Security Council technical working group As the situation has now stabilized and all provinces are in response mode. Therefore, the frequency of the Working Group meetings is now twice a week, every Sunday and Wednesday. Overview of assessment status: Number of villages yet to be assessed (based on initial unverified reports) Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of material on this map, and all other maps contained herein, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. The final status of Jammu and Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. Data sources: AGCHO, OCHA field offices. -
Transitioning Afghanistan in the Post-Withdrawal Era: Setting the Stage for a Stable Political Order
Transitioning Afghanistan in the Post-Withdrawal Era: Setting the Stage for a Stable Political Order Reza Sanati * Abstract : Within the coming year, the American led-NATO mission will begin withdrawing troops from Afghanistan. Though the decrease in troop levels in the short-term has been expected, the final date wherein all American and NATO troops leave the country is still a matter of heated debate, primarily for two reasons: the inconclusive steadiness of the present Afghan regime and the uncertainty of what a post-withdrawal Afghanistan would like. With this in mind, this article intends to explore both the logic of NATO intervention and the subsequent occupation of that war-torn country. It examines the primary reasons why stability and progress within Afghanistan have been elusive, the current debate amongst policy makers regarding the steps ahead, and finally proposing an alternative model that proposes a new US and NATO regional strategy that places the burden on Afghanistan stability and reconstruction on neighbors who share the larger NATO goal of a self-sufficient and stable Afghan government. Accordingly, the most potentially successful NATO approach towards Afghan stability would adopt the proven economic, social, political, infrastructural, and local governance models of regional states, and honing and adopting those models into the broader Afghan domestic theatre. For this to happen, a new plan of cooperation from both NATO and American policy makers with regional states and their respective civil societies needs to be -
Men, Masculinities, Conflict and Peacebuilding in Afghanistan
Navigating norms and insecurity: Men, masculinities, conflict and peacebuilding in Afghanistan WORKING PAPER | NOVEMBER 2018 Henri Myrttinen European Union initiative CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 2 GENDER, CONFLICT AND PEACEBUILDING .............................................................................................. 3 Why masculinities? ............................................................................................................................. 4 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Project background ............................................................................................................................. 5 Women, peace and security in Afghanistan ....................................................................................... 6 Background to the target provinces ................................................................................................... 7 RESEARCH FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................. 11 Gender norms .................................................................................................................................. -
Afghanistan: Floods
P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Afghanistan: Floods DREF Operation n° MDRAF008 Glide n°: FL-2021-000050-AFG Expected timeframe: 6 months For DREF; Date of issue: 16/05/2021 Expected end date: 30/11/2021 Category allocated to the disaster or crisis: Yellow EPoA Appeal / One International Appeal Funding Requirements: - DREF allocated: CHF 497,700 Total number of people affected: 30,800 (4,400 Number of people to be 14,000 (2,000 households) assisted: households) 6 provinces (Bamyan, Provinces affected: 16 provinces1 Provinces targeted: Herat, Panjshir, Sar-i-Pul, Takhar, Wardak) Host National Society(ies) presence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): Afghan Red Crescent Society (ARCS) has around 2,027 staff and 30,000 volunteers, 34 provincial branches and seven regional offices all over the country. There will be four regional Offices and six provincial branches involved in this operation. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: ARCS is working with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC) and International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) with presence in Afghanistan. Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: (i) Government ministries and agencies, Afghan National Disaster Management Authority (ANDMA), Provincial Disaster Management Committees (PDMCs), Department of Refugees and Repatriation, and Department for Rural Rehabilitation and Development. (ii) UN agencies; OCHA, UNICEF, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), International Organization for Migration (IOM) and World Food Programme (WFP). (iii) International NGOs: some of the international NGOs, which have been active in the affected areas are including, Danish Committee for Aid to Afghan Refugees (DACAAR), Danish Refugee Council (DRC), International Rescue Committee, and Care International. -
Global Environment Facility
Naoko Ishii, PhD Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 USA INVESTING IN OUR PlANET Tel: 202.473.3202 Fax: 202.522.3240/3245 E-mail: [email protected] www.TheGEF.org March 07,2014 Dear LDCF /SCCF Council Member, UNDP as the Implementing Agency for the project entitled: Afghanistan: Strengthening the Resilience of Rural Livelihood Options for Afghan Communities in Panjshir, Balkh, Uruzgan and Herat Provinces to Manage Climate change-induced Disaster Risks.. has submitted the attached proposed project document for CEO endorsement prior to final approval of the project document in accordance with UNDP procedures. The Secretariat has reviewed the project document. It is consistent with the proposal approved by the LDCF/SCCF Council in March 2013 and the proposed project remains consistent with the Instrument and LDCF /GEF policies and procedures. The attached explanation prepared by UNDP satisfactorily details how Council's comments have been addressed. We have today posted the proposed project document on the GEF website at www.TheGEF.org for your information. We would welcome any comments you may wish to provide by April 04,2014 before I endorse the project. You may send your comments to [email protected]. If you do not have access to the Web, you may request the local field office ofUNDP or the World Bank to download the document for you. Alternatively, you may request a copy of the document from the Secretariat. If you make such a request, please confirm for us -
Ethnicity, Space, and Politics in Afghanistan
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Urban Studies Senior Seminar Papers Urban Studies Program 11-2009 Ethnicity, Space, and Politics in Afghanistan Benjamin Dubow University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/senior_seminar Dubow, Benjamin, "Ethnicity, Space, and Politics in Afghanistan" (2009). Urban Studies Senior Seminar Papers. 13. https://repository.upenn.edu/senior_seminar/13 Suggested Citation: Benjamin Dubow. "Ethnicity, Space, and Politics in Afghanistan." University of Pennsylvania, Urban Studies Program. 2009. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/senior_seminar/13 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ethnicity, Space, and Politics in Afghanistan Abstract The 2004 election was a disaster. For all the unity that could have come from 2001, the election results shattered any hope that the country had overcome its fractures. The winner needed to find a way to unite a country that could not be more divided. In Afghanistan’s Panjshir Province, runner-up Yunis Qanooni received 95.0% of the vote. In Paktia Province, incumbent Hamid Karzai received 95.9%. Those were only two of the seven provinces where more than 90% or more of the vote went to a single candidate. Two minor candidates who received less than a tenth of the total won 83% and 78% of the vote in their home provinces. For comparison, the most lopsided state in the 2004 United States was Wyoming, with 69% of the vote going to Bush. This means Wyoming voters were 1.8 times as likely to vote for Bush as were Massachusetts voters. Paktia voters were 120 times as likely to vote for Karzai as were Panjshir voters. -
A Summary of Jihadi Progress in Panjsher Province | Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
8/3/2019 A summary of Jihadi progress in Panjsher province | Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan A summary of Jihadi progress in Panjsher province Panjsher province is situated in the north of our beloved homeland, at the distance of 120 km from capital city Kabul. This strategic province shares its boundaries with six other provinces of the country, i.e. Kapisa, Parwan, Baghlan, Takhar, Badakhshan and Nuristan provinces. ‘Shatal’ district of this province has joining boundary with Parwan province. The strategic ‘Salang’ pass and the historic and the magnificent chain of ‘Hindu Kush’ mountains traverse through these two provinces (i.e. Parwan and Panjsher) by connecting north of the country with its center and southern parts. During the Soviet invasion of eighties, these strategic places were turned into burning points and it was quite difficult for the then foreign invaders as well as for their internal communist stooges to cross the area peacefully without suffering heavy casualties and significant financial losses. The same is the case today, as the American invaders and their internal mercenaries are deeply troubled and concerned about the huge and active presence of the heroic Mujahidin of the Islamic Emirate in the above-mentioned two provinces. ‘Paryan’ district of ‘Panjsher’ province is connected with ‘Kiraan & Manjan’ district of the northern most Badakhshan province. During the reign of the Islamic Emirate, this route remained opened as a main supply line from the north for the then warlords of the area. By the grace of Allah Almighty, now this strategic pass is completely controlled by the courageous Mujahidin of the Islamic Emirate and all kinds of enemy’s movements are ceased in the area. -
Länderinformationen Afghanistan Country
Staatendokumentation Country of Origin Information Afghanistan Country Report Security Situation (EN) from the COI-CMS Country of Origin Information – Content Management System Compiled on: 17.12.2020, version 3 This project was co-financed by the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund Disclaimer This product of the Country of Origin Information Department of the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum was prepared in conformity with the standards adopted by the Advisory Council of the COI Department and the methodology developed by the COI Department. A Country of Origin Information - Content Management System (COI-CMS) entry is a COI product drawn up in conformity with COI standards to satisfy the requirements of immigration and asylum procedures (regional directorates, initial reception centres, Federal Administrative Court) based on research of existing, credible and primarily publicly accessible information. The content of the COI-CMS provides a general view of the situation with respect to relevant facts in countries of origin or in EU Member States, independent of any given individual case. The content of the COI-CMS includes working translations of foreign-language sources. The content of the COI-CMS is intended for use by the target audience in the institutions tasked with asylum and immigration matters. Section 5, para 5, last sentence of the Act on the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum (BFA-G) applies to them, i.e. it is as such not part of the country of origin information accessible to the general public. However, it becomes accessible to the party in question by being used in proceedings (party’s right to be heard, use in the decision letter) and to the general public by being used in the decision. -
Executive Summary
global witness “We are at risk of the curse of plenty, [the] curse of resources.” Ashraf Ghani, President of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan1 “The mine belongs to the whole nation. It is for all of us.” ‘Haji Anwar’, a miner from Badakhshan2 “This mine is itself a general (…) It will make people fight.” ‘Haji Bashir’, an elder from the district of Kuran wa Munjan3 WAR IN THE TREASURY OF THE PEOPLE | JUNE 2016 3 70°30'0"E 71°0'0"E Kokcha River Faizabad District Arghanjkhwa R Faizabad District RAryan Baharak RArgo Shuhada Argo District Baharak District N N " " 0 0 ' District R ' 0 M 0 ° Khash ° 7 7 3 R 3 Deodarra n a l h Ì M Pul e Ali Mughul g Darayem a Teshkan R Khash B R Darayem Jurm & District Keb z R ( u District d n u Keshem K R a i v l Warduj u Pul e Such M b Teshkan a Keshem Firgamiru Jurm District K District ( District Ob e Roghak M District Teer Garan Khostak valley R Ob e Khestak M Ob e Djokham M Yamgan N N " M R " 0 0 ' ' 0 0 3 Tagab 3 ° ° 6 Mir Kan Kokcha River 6 3 R District Yamgan 3 District B a d a k h s h a n Zebak B a d a k h s h a n District Farkhar P r o v ii n c e District Robat e Bolo ( Jangalak block Sar e Sang Junduk and Petawuk M Ì block T a k h a r P r o v ii n c e ( Lajwardshoh Ì Chelemuk block Warsaj PAKISTAN Kuran wa Munjan Chitral District District Skazer( N R N " " 0 0 ' ' 0 0 ° ° 6 6 3 3 ( Anjuman Kuran wa Munjan Anjuman Pass District N u r ii s tt a n P a n jj s h ii r P r o v ii n c e Barg e Matal r e P r o v ii n c e h s District j n a P a i Paryan District v l Mandol District u b a K 70°30'0"E 71°0'0"E Legend 0 10 20 30 40 50 Km M Checkpoints/incidents (2014) Primary road network ° Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 Ì Mining sites Major rivers/water R District Center Rivers/streams Date Created: 27 April 2015 Data Source(s): ( Town/village mentioned in text Provincial boundaries UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN OCHA), Lajwardeen contract concession blocks District boundaries AGCHO, CSO, AIMS, MISTI. -
Transition to Afghan Lead: Inteqal
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Media Backgrounder Transition to Afghan lead: Inteqal Inteqal - the Dari and Pashtu word for Transition – is the process by which security responsibility for Afghanistan is gradually transitioned from NATO/ISAF to Afghan leadership. Key dates: 28 August 2008: Lead security responsibility for Kabul city transferred to Afghan Forces 19 November 2009: President Karzai, having won a second Presidential term, expresses his ambition to see the Afghan National Security Forces take the lead security responsibility across Afghanistan by the end of 2014 20 July 2010: Kabul Conference. The Joint Afghan-NATO Inteqal Board (JANIB) is established as the mechanism to assess districts and provinces for transition 20 November 2010: NATO Lisbon Summit. The Inteqal process is agreed between the Afghan Government and NATO Bamyan Provincial Governor Dr. Sarabi 22 March 2011: Afghan New Year. President Karzai announces the first set of Afghan districts and provinces to start the addresses attendees during the Transition ceremony in Bamyan Province. Transition process 17 July 2011: First Transition ceremony takes place, in Bamyan province October 2011: Afghan Government to announce the second tranche of Transition “Afghanistan’s Transition Tranche 1 On 22 March 2011, President Karzai announced the first set of Afghan districts and provinces to start Transition. This decision drew future is clear: on the assessment and recommendations of the Afghan Government and NATO/ISAF through the Joint Afghan-NATO Inteqal a country led Board (JANIB). Based upon operational, political and economic considerations, the following areas were identified for inclusion in the first ‘tranche’ by Afghans, of Transition: Bamyan province (all districts), Panjshir province (all districts), Kabul province (all districts except Surobi), as well as the municipalities of Mazar-e-Sharif (Balkh province), Herat (Herat province), Lashkar Gah (Helmand province) and Mehtar Lam defended by (Laghman province). -
Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance
Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs November 8, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21922 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Summary The limited capacity and widespread corruption of all levels of Afghan governance are factors in debate over the effectiveness of U.S. policy in Afghanistan and in implementing a transition to Afghan security leadership by the end of 2014. The capacity of the formal Afghan governing structure has increased significantly since the Taliban regime fell in late 2001, but many positions, particularly at the local level, are unfilled. Widespread illiteracy limits expansion of a competent bureaucracy. A dispute over the results of the 2010 parliamentary elections paralyzed governance for nearly a year and was resolved in September 2011 with the unseating on the grounds of fraud of nine winners of the elected lower house of parliament. Karzai also has tried, through direct denials, to quell assertions by his critics that he wants to stay in office beyond the 2014 expiration of his second term, the limits under the constitution. While trying, with mixed success, to build the formal governing structure, Afghan President Hamid Karzai also works through an informal power structure centered around his close ethnic Pashtun allies as well as other ethnic and political faction leaders. Some faction leaders oppose Karzai on the grounds that he is too willing to make concessions to insurgent leaders in search of a settlement—a criticism that grew following the September 20 assassination of the most senior Tajik leader, former President Burhanuddin Rabbani. -
End of Year Report (2018) About Mujahideen Progress and Territory Control
End of year report (2018) about Mujahideen progress and territory control: The Year of Collapse of Trump’s Strategy 2018 was a year that began with intense bombardments, military operations and propaganda by the American invaders but all praise belongs to Allah, it ended with the neutralization of another enemy strategy. The Mujahideen defended valiantly, used their chests as shields against enemy onslaughts and in the end due to divine assistance, the invaders were forced to review their war strategy. This report is based on precise data collected from concerned areas and verified by primary sources, leaving no room for suspicious or inaccurate information. In the year 2018, a total of 10638 attacks were carried out by Mujahideen against invaders and their hirelings from which 31 were martyr operations which resulted in the death of 249 US and other invading troops and injuries to 153 along with death toll of 22594 inflicted on Kabul administration troops, intelligence operatives, commandos, police and Arbakis with a further 14063 sustaining injuries. Among the fatalities 514 were enemy commanders killed and eliminated in various attacks across the country. During 2018 a total of 3613 vehicles including APCs, pickup trucks and other variants were destroyed along with 26 aircrafts including 8 UAVs, 17 helicopters of foreign and internal forces and 1 cargo plane shot down. Moreover, a total of 29 district administration centers were liberated by the Mujahideen of Islamic Emirate over the course of last year, among which some were retained