DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/19524 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-30 and may be subject to change. PREPARATION TO THE QUESTION OF THE SENSE OF BEING IN MARTIN HEIDEGGER’S THOUGHT. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE “EXISTENTIAL ANALYTIC” OF DASEIN: SEIN UND ZEIT (1927) - WAS IST METAPHYSIK? (1929) - REKTORATSREDE (1933) (Philosophy, Science, and Politics) een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van de Filosofie Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. dr. C.W.P.M. Blom, volgens besluit van het College van Decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 8 November 2004 des namiddags om 1.30 uur precies door Stefano Andrea Esengrini geboren op 30 juli 1969 te Milaan (Italie) Promotores: Prof. Dr. Ph. Van Haute Prof. Dr. M. Carbone (Università degli Studi di Milano, Italia) Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. Dr. B. Vedder Prof. Dr. P. Cobben (Universiteit van Tilburg) Dr. C. Bremmers 2 To my mother 3 INDEX NOTE ON ABBREVIATIONS p. 7 INTRODUCTION Heidegger’s “enormity” and the question of Being § 1. The sense of the relation between philosophy and science 9 a) The Greek beginning of thought 9 b) The main consequence of the “return to the Greeks”: putting into question the positivistic interpretation of the world 10 c) The difference between Being and being: world and language 11 d) The new determination of man’s essence: alèthéia, Dasein, stay 13 § 2. Plan of the dissertation 15 a) Overall outlook 15 b) The circular structure of the thesis 21 c) Methodological note on the circular structure of the thesis: the relation between philosophy and politics 31 CHAPTER ONE Reflections on the difference between philosophy and science based on the phenomenon of the forgetfulness of Being: the ontological difference § 1. Preliminary interpretation of man’s essence: the “existential analytic” of Dasein and the forgetfulness of Being 34 a) Remarks on the preparatory character of the research 34 b) The ground of Sein und Zeit: the need of reawakening an understanding for the sense of Being 37 c) The forgetfulness of Being as the ground of the age of science and technology 42 d) The sense for Being as preparation to the transformation of an experience of time and history 46 § 2. Determination of the essence of philosophy in comparison with positive sciences (sciences of beings): philosophy as critical science (science of Being) 50 a) Preliminary clarification of the question of the sense for Being, on the grounds of the repetition of the guiding-question of Metaphysics: “what is a being?” 50 b) Positive sciences as sciences of beings 54 c) Philosophy as critical science: the difference between Being and being 56 § 3. Note on time: “time” and “ontological difference” in the lightofthe “topology ofBeing” 61 a) Being, time and temporality 61 b) Time as locality of the manifestation of Being: Anwesenheit as Gegen-wart 63 c) Time and Heidegger’s “reversal”: the difference between Being and being 69 d) Note on the temporality of Dasein in Sein und Zeit 74 § 4. Remarks on the essence of science and its positivistic interpretation 78 a) Introduction: the crisis of the sciences as the “expression of the radical life- crisis of European humanity” (E. Husserl) 78 b) Notes on M. Heidegger, Die Bedrohung der Wissenschaft (1937) 81 4 c) Note on the essence of the “world view”, on the ground of Nihilism as accomplished unfolding of the forgetfulness of Being 84 d) Notes on H. Hahn-O. Neurath-R. Carnap, Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung (1929) 86 § 5. Conclusive reflections: on the need of interpreting man’s essence as Dasein in the light of the sense of the expression “everything functions” 89 § 6. Recapitulation and link to the second chapter 92 CHAPTER TWO The question o f the sense fo r Being in Sein und Zeit, §§ 1-44: Dasein, disclosedness, and truth (existence - Being in the world - disposition) § 1. Methodological considerations: Being and Dasein 94 a) The circular nature of man’s relation to Being and its implications with regard to history and politics (Löwith and Lukács) 94 b) The forgetfulness of Being and the de-obstruction of the history ofMetaphysics 97 c) Plan of the chapter 99 § 2. Dasein as “existence” and the phenomenon of the “understanding of Being” 101 a) The priority of Dasein inside the question of Being 101 b) Existence as comportment (posture) towards Being on the ground of the difference between Being and being 103 c) The existential analytic as “fundamental ontology”: the sense of “existence” (Heidegger, Sartre and Lukács) 106 d) Authenticity and inauthenticity as D asein s ways of Being 111 § 3. Dasein ’s “Being in the world” as its fundamental existential constitution 113 a) “Being in the world” in the light of the phenomenon of “transcendence” (Vom Wesen des Grundes, 1929) 114 b) Elucidation of the structure of the basic state of D asein on the grounds of its decisive moment: “Being-in” 117 § 4. “Being-in” as “disposition (attunement)”: Dasein ’s disclosedness to Being 119 § 5. The disposition o f angst as Dasein ’s distinctive disclosedness 125 a) The question of angst in Sein und Zeit 125 b) The question ofangst in Was ist Metaphysik?: philosophy, science and the Nothing 127 § 6. The scientific-positivistic interpretation o f truth as derived mode o f the philosophical one 128 a) Foreword: Being and truth 128 b) The reduction of Being to “Reality” 129 c) Dasein and its disclosure to the truth of Being 130 d) The truth of Being as “native harmony” 131 e) Towards the transformation of modern man’s stay: Being, world and labour (Heidegger and Adorno) 133 § 7. Perspectives: truth, history, and politics on the ground of the ontological difference 135 § 8. Recapitulation and link to the third chapter 137 5 CHAPTER THREE The Rektoratsrede: exposition of the essence of knowledge and science on which the University has to be founded § 1. Heidegger and politics: preliminary considerations 140 § 2. Heidegger and politics: methodological and bibliographical remarks 144 a) The Heidegger-Forschung on Heidegger’s political involvement 144 b) In-depth analyses of Habermas’, Pöggeler’s and Rockmore’s positions 147 c) Fédier’s contributions to an understanding of the “Heidegger affaire” 152 d) Interpreting Heidegger’s rectorate on the ground of Fédier’s theses: Sein und Zeit - Was ist Metaphysik? - Rektoratsrede 159 § 3. The “cultural debate” in Italy during the twenty-year period fascist Regime: the figure of Elio Vittorini (1908-1966) 164 § 4. Introduction to Rektoratsrede. The University and the destiny of the German people: the essence of knowledge and man’s Being in the world 173 § 5. Notes for a comment on Rektoratsrede. A four-stage appeal to Germany: “Intention to found the essence of the university in a primordial manner” (A 17) 178 a) The revolution of the essence of knowledge as re-establishment of an immediate relation with the (Greek) question of Being 178 b) Structure of the following parts of the chapter 184 c) Comment on the first stage. The University: the essence of knowledge and the destiny of a people 186 d) Comment on the second stage. The question of Being as ground of the spiritual world of a people 189 e) Comment on the third stage. The strife for the essence of knowledge 192 f) Comment on the fourth stage. The urgency of a decision in favour of the essence of the University 195 g) Comment on Heidegger’s subtitle of his Rektoratsrede 196 § 6. Education as decision infavour of a strife between “those who lead” and“those whofollow” 200 § 7. Labour as educational power within a real human community 205 CONCLUSION The new future of knowledge (thought and art) on the ground of the ontological difference 214 BIBLIOGRAPHY 220 6 NOTE ON ABBREVIATIONS In case of quotations from Works that have been countermarked with an abbreviation: 1) The abbreviation is immediately followed by the number of the page of the original edition; 2) In case there is an English translation of the same Work, the number of the page refers to its English edition - see “Abbreviations” of Works by Martin Heidegger (A) and by other authors (B). A) WORKS BY MARTIN HEIDEGGER N.B. The Abbreviation HGA stands for Heideggers Gesamtausgabe, Klostermann, Frankfurt a. M. 1975 ff. QA Antwort. Martin Heidegger im Gespräch, Neske, Pfullingen 1988; Engl. Trans. Martin Heidegger and National Socialism: Questions and Answers, Paragon House, New York 1990 EP Écrites politiques, Gallimard, Paris 1995 BT Sein und Zeit (1927), HGA 2, Klostermann, Frankfurt a. M. 1977; Engl. Trans. Being and Time, Blackwell, Oxford 1987 PM Wegmarken (1919-1961), HGA 9, Klostermann, Frankfurt a. M. 1976; Engl. Trans. Pathmarks, Cambridge University Press, New York 1998 B) WORKS BY OTHER AUTHORS DH 1 Jean Beaufret, Dialogue avec Heidegger. Philosophie grecque, t. 1, Minuit, Paris 1973 DQ Eryck de Rubercy-Dominique Le Buhan, Douze questions posées à Jean Beaufret à propos de Martin Heidegger, Aubier, Paris 1975 (1983) E Jean Beaufret, Entretiens avec Frédéric de Towarnicki, PUF, Paris 1984 H François Fédier, Heidegger: anatomie d ’un scandale, Laffont, Paris 1988 RV François Fédier, Regarder voir, Les Belles Lettres/Archimbaud, Paris 1995 WW Hans Hahn-Otto Neurath-Rudolf Carnap, Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis, «Veröffentlichungen des Vereins Ernst Mach», Artur Wolf Verlag, Wien 1929 7 CES Edmund Husserl, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie, hrsg. von W. Biemel, Husserliana Band VI, Nijhoff, Haag 1954; Engl.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Èthos and Ek-Sistence Humanism As an Explicitly Ethical Preoccupation in Heidegger’S Letter on Humanism
    Èthos and ek-sistence Humanism as an explicitly ethical preoccupation in Heidegger’s Letter on Humanism Thesis for obtaining a “Master of Arts” degree in philosophy Radboud University Nijmegen Name: Senne van den Berg Student number: s4433068 Supervisor: prof. dr. G. J. van der Heiden Second examiner: dr. V.L.M. Vasterling Date: 30-09-2020 I hereby declare and assure that I, Senne van den Berg, have drafted this thesis independently, that no other sources and/or means other than those mentioned have been used and that the passages of which the text content or meaning originates in other works - including electronic media - have been identified and the sources clearly stated. Place: Nijmegen, date: 30-09-2020. 2 Èthos and ek-sistence Humanism as an explicitly ethical preoccupation in Heidegger’s Letter on Humanism To stand under the claim of presence is the greatest claim made upon the human being. It is “ethics." 1 – Martin Heidegger Senne van den Berg Abstract: Martin Heidegger’s 1947 Letter on Humanism takes up a significant place in the oeuvre of the German philosopher. This important text is often discussed for two topics: Heidegger’s discussion of humanism, and his discussion of ethics as ‘abode.’ However, these two topics are being discussed isolated from each other, which obscures the inherent relation there is between the two for Heidegger. This paper will show that Heidegger’s discussion of humanism in the Letter is decisively shaped by his ethical preoccupations. I. Heidegger, humanism and ethics Martin Heidegger’s 19472 Letter on Humanism takes up a significant place in the oeuvre of the German philosopher.
    [Show full text]
  • Derrida and Heidegger in France
    Derrida and Heidegger in France TOM ROCKMORE, Duquesne University For a long period after the war, roughly from the rise of structuralism in the 1950s until the publication of Victor FarIas's Heideggerand Nazism in 1987, Martin Heidegger played a crucial role as the single most important thinker of "French" philosophy.1 In recent years, Jacques Derrida, in some ways a quintessentially French thinker, has become, with Hans-Georg Gadamer, one of Heidegger's two most important exponents. Heidegger's special role in French philosophy is attributable to a number of circumstances, including the tireless advocacy of Jean Beaufret, who, more than any other person, promoted Heidegger's position and defended it against criticism, especially against criticism motivated by Heidegger's turn toward Nazism. After Beaufret's death in 1982, Derrida increasingly assumed Beaufret's mantle as Heidegger's most important French proponent. Derrida's theory emerged within a generally Heideggerian atmosphere. Although never wholly uncritical, he has contributed in important ways to maintaining a French reading of Heidegger. Since the resurgence of interest in Heidegger's Nazism and the subsequent, rapid decline of Heidegger in France, Derrida has assumed a double role as both critic and staunch defender of a certain French view of Heidegger. This paper considers the complex interaction between Denida and Heidegger in France. Heidegger's effect on his students takes different forms. Many limit themselves to exegesis of the master's thought, while others develop ideas that are often influenced, even strongly influenced, by Heidegger's position. Gadamer, who attended Heidegger's lectures as a student, was unable to break free from his master's influence for many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Journal of French Philosophy Volume 17, Number 1, Spring 2007 Slaughterbench of Humanisms: The 1987 Heidegger Affair in Intellectual-Historical Perspective Stefanos Geroulanos In the fall of 1987, one of the most significant affairs in recent intellectual history erupted in France when the unknown Chilean writer Victor Farias published a well-researched but philosophically unimpressive book on Martin Heidegger’s Nazism. To publishers abroad, notably in Germany, the volume rang a hollow bell, and remained unprinted, as debates on existentialism, Heidegger’s engagement with the Nazi party, and his continuing political position in the fifties lay in the past.1 But in France, despite a certain academic awareness of Heidegger’s Nazi engagement, the effect was very different:2 Farias struck a nerve, and suddenly the intellectual milieu erupted into furious polemics. This 1987 Heidegger Affair has long been read as the final curtain for a movement that lent support to several epistemological ruptures in French philosophy (according to some of the more positive accounts) or flourished as an uncritical and pretentious audience for Heidegger (in the less generous ones). Yet although it provided a number of signs indicating shifts in intellectual tendencies, the affair has never been seriously treated as a barometer for the recent past of French thought.3 The present essay attempts to offer a necessarily schematic intellectual- historical description of the 1987 affair as an intellectual event emerging with the rise of a neo-humanist politics that
    [Show full text]
  • I Letter on Humanism
    i i I I I i v LETTER ON HUMANISM ~ To think is to confine yourself to a single thought that one day stands still like a star in the world's sky. Letter on Humanism 191 nature that would guarantee the rightness of his choice and the efficacy of his action. "There is reality only in action," Sartre in­ sists (p. 55), and existentialism "defines man by action" (p. 62), which is to say, "in connection with an engagement" (p. 78). Nevertheless, Sartre reaffirms (pp. 64 ff.) that man's freedom to act is rooted in subjectivity, which alone grants man his dignity, so that the Cartesian cogito becomes the only possible In Brussels during the spring of 1845, not long after his expul­ point de depart for existentialism and the only possible basis for sion from Paris, Karl Marx jotted down several notes on the a humanism (p. 93). German philosopher Ludwig Feuerbach. The second of these Heidegger responds by keeping open the question of action reads: "The question whether human thought achieves objective but strongly criticizing the tradition of subjectivity, which cele­ truth is not a question of theory but a practical question.... Dis­ brates the "I think" as the font of liberty. Much of the "Letter" pute over the actuality or nonactuality of any thinking that is taken up with renewed insistence that Dasein or existence is isolates itself from praxis is a purely scholastic question." Ever and remains beyond the pale of Cartesian subjectivism. Again since that time-especially in France, which Marx exalted as the Heidegger writes Existenz as Ek-sistenz in order to stress man's heart of the Revolution-the relation of philosophy to political "standing out" into the "truth of Being." Humanism underes­ practice has been a burning issue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unfolding of Language and Being in Heidegger's Later Work, 1949-1976
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fall 2009 Sprache als Be-wëgen: The nfoldinU g of Language and Being in Heidegger's Later Work, 1949-1976 Douglas F. Peduti Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Peduti, D. (2009). Sprache als Be-wëgen: The nfoU lding of Language and Being in Heidegger's Later Work, 1949-1976 (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1033 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPRACHE ALS BE-WËGEN: THE UNFOLDING OF LANGUAGE AND BEING IN HEIDEGGER’S LATER WORK, 1949-1976 A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Douglas Francis Peduti, S.J. December 2009 Copyright by Douglas F. Peduti, S.J. 2009 SPRACHE ALS BE-WËGEN: THE UNFOLDING OF LANGUAGE AND BEING IN HEIDEGGER’S LATER WORK, 1949-1976 By Douglas F. Peduti, S.J. Approved August 28, 2009 __________________________________ __________________________________ James Swindal, Ph.D. Richard Rojcewicz, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Philosophy Associate Professor of Philosophy (Dissertation Director) Point Park University (Reader) In memoriam, 27 February 2009 __________________________________ Wilhelm Wurzer, Ph.D. Andrew Cutrofello, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy Professor and Graduate Program Director (Reader) Loyola University Chicago (Outside Reader) _________________________________ __________________________________ Christopher M.
    [Show full text]
  • Heidegger on Truth (Aletheia). a Bibliography
    Heidegger on Truth (Aletheia). A Bibliography https://www.ontology.co/biblio/heidegger-aletheia-biblio.htm Theory and History of Ontology by Raul Corazzon | e-mail: [email protected] Selected Bibliography on Heidegger's Interpretation of Aletheia as Unconcealment HEIDEGGER'S MAIN TEXTS ON Aletheia AND VERITAS Abbreviations: GA = Gesamtausgabe (Collected works); SS = Summer semester (from May to July); WS = Winter semester (from November to February) In his work Besinnung (GA 67 p. 107), Heidegger give a list of nine texts where he examines the question of truth (I cite from the English translation, Mindfulness, translated by Parvis Emad and Thomas Kalary, New York, Continuum, 2006, pp. 89-90: "Question of Truth: A directive. 1. Vom Wesen der Wahrheit (lecture of 1930) (1); in addition, interpretation of the simile of the cave in the lecture-course of 1931/32 (2) 2. Vom Ursprung des Kunstwerks (Freiburg lecture of 1935) (3) 3. Vom Ursprung des Kunstwerks (Frankfurt lectures of 1936) (4) 4. Vom Wesen der Wahrheit (lecture of 1937/38) (5) 5. Die Grundlegung des neuzeitlichen Weltbildes durch die Metaphysik (lecture of 1938) (6) 6. Anmerkungen zu Nietzsches II. Unzeitgemässe Betrachtung, Abschnitt VI Wahrheit und Gerechtigkeit, lecture-seminar of 1938/39 (7) 7. Lecture course of summer semester of 1939 (Nietzsche, Wille zur Macht, III. Buch, Der Wille zur Macht als Erkenntnis) (8) 8. Beiträge zur Philosophie, 1936, section: Gründung (9) 9. Zu Aristoteles, Physik B 1 (physis), third term of 1940, pp. 22 ff. (10)" Notes: (1) To appear in Vorträge, GA 80. (2) See Vom Wesen der Wahrheit: Zu Platons Hölengleichnis und Theätet, lecture in the summer semester of 1931/32, GA 34, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • © 2008 State University of New York Press, Albany David Pettigrew and François Raffoul and a Thought Marked by the German Phenomenological Tradition
    Introduction David Pettigrew and François Raffoul In May 2002, the annual meeting of the North American Heidegger Confer- ence took place at Southern Connecticut State University in New Haven.The conference, entitled “Heidegger and France,” was inspired by Dominique Jani- caud’s opus magnum Heidegger en France, a remarkable work that chronicles the reception of Heidegger over the course of more than seven decades. Dominique Janicaud was one of two invited keynote speakers at the confer- ence. Tragically, he was to die unexpectedly in August of the same year. This book, drawn from many of the papers presented at the Heidegger conference along with other invited contributions, is dedicated to his memory. While Dominique Janicaud’s book Heidegger en France is a groundbreak- ing intellectual history of that reception, a radical and bold intertwining of Historie and Geschichte (much of Janicaud’s book is a reconstruction of the his- tory of the reception of Heidegger’s work, following a chronological order from the late twenties and early thirties until the end of the century1), French Interpretations of Heidegger: An Exceptional Reception undertakes a philosophical engagement of the work of a number of the most significant and most cre- ative figures of that reception. Dominique Janicaud’s own essay,“Toward the End of the ‘French Exception’?,” delivered at the Heidegger Conference, serves as an introduction to this volume. Janicaud’s essay is then followed by chapters that address the work of the thinkers who have engaged Heidegger’s work, including Jean Beaufret, Jean-Paul Sartre, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Emmanuel Levinas, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, Gilles Deleuze, Jean- Luc Nancy, Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, Luce Irigaray, Marlène Zarader, Jean Greisch, and Françoise Dastur.
    [Show full text]
  • Being at the Beginning: Heidegger's Interpretation of Heraclitus Daniel O
    Being at the Beginning: Heidegger's Interpretation of Heraclitus Daniel O. Dahlstrom Herr Schulz, wenn ich nachdenke, dann ist es manchmal so, als ob Heraklit danebensteht. – Heidegger to Walter Schulz1 In Heidegger's lexicon 'being' usually designates what, in this or that historical epoch, it means for any entity to be. Hence, it is not to be confused with a term designating any entity or set of entities, though it necessarily stands in an essential relation to human beings, as creatures uniquely capable of differentiating beings from what gives them meaning. But the meaning of being, so construed, must also be distinguished from what grounds or constitutes its essential correlation with human beings. Heidegger labels this ground the Ereignis.2 He also refers to it as Seynsgeschichte to signal the fact that, as part of this Ereignis, the history of interpretations of being constitutes and, in that sense, underlies our way of being and understanding being. In the process, this still-unfolding history takes hold of us in the ways we make this destiny our own, mindlessly or not. Indeed, in our preoccupation with particular beings (including the metaphysical preoccupation with them insofar as they exist, i.e., with the being of beings), this history easily escapes our notice. In the period from 1935 to 1945 Heidegger attempts to develop a kind of thinking that could become mindful of this history and thereby free from it (a 3/24/10 Being at the Beginning 2 freedom, it bears adding, that calls, by no means for forgetting or dismissing it, but for paying final respects to it).3 Essential to this history and no less party to it are salient ways of thinking that privilege some entity or another (God, nature, matter, humans, scientifically determined reality) as the key to the meaning of 'being.' By thus obscuring the difference between being and beings, these ways of thinking unknowingly contribute to concealing – and waylaying any concern for – the grounds of that difference.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bataillean Answer to the Heidegger Controversy
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School March 2020 Nostalgia and (In)authentic Community: A Bataillean Answer to the Heidegger Controversy Patrick Miller University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Scholar Commons Citation Miller, Patrick, "Nostalgia and (In)authentic Community: A Bataillean Answer to the Heidegger Controversy" (2020). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/8256 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nostalgia and (In)authentic Community: A Bataillean Answer to the Heidegger Controversy by Patrick Miller A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Joshua Rayman, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Stephen Turner, Ph.D. Lee Braver, Ph.D. Douglas Jesseph, Ph.D. Alphonso Lingis, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March, 26, 2020 Keywords: Bataille, Heidegger, Fascism, Community, Authenticity Copyright © 2020, Patrick Miller Table of Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/19524 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-25 and may be subject to change. PREPARATION TO THE QUESTION OF THE SENSE OF BEING IN MARTIN HEIDEGGER’S THOUGHT. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE “EXISTENTIAL ANALYTIC” OF DASEIN: SEIN UND ZEIT (1927) - WAS IST METAPHYSIK? (1929) - REKTORATSREDE (1933) (Philosophy, Science, and Politics) een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van de Filosofie Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. dr. C.W.P.M. Blom, volgens besluit van het College van Decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 8 November 2004 des namiddags om 1.30 uur precies door Stefano Andrea Esengrini geboren op 30 juli 1969 te Milaan (Italie) Promotores: Prof. Dr. Ph. Van Haute Prof. Dr. M. Carbone (Università degli Studi di Milano, Italia) Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. Dr. B. Vedder Prof. Dr. P. Cobben (Universiteit van Tilburg) Dr. C. Bremmers 2 To my mother 3 INDEX NOTE ON ABBREVIATIONS p. 7 INTRODUCTION Heidegger’s “enormity” and the question of Being § 1. The sense of the relation between philosophy and science 9 a) The Greek beginning of thought 9 b) The main consequence of the “return to the Greeks”: putting into question the positivistic interpretation of the world 10 c) The difference between Being and being: world and language 11 d) The new determination of man’s essence: alèthéia, Dasein, stay 13 § 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Solicitude: Towards a Heideggerian Care Ethics-Of-Assistance" (2018)
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Philosophy Collections Fall 9-2018 Solicitude: Towards a Heideggerian Care Ethics-of- Assistance Babette Babich Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/phil_babich Part of the Applied Ethics Commons, Continental Philosophy Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Other Nursing Commons Recommended Citation Babich, Babette, "Solicitude: Towards a Heideggerian Care Ethics-of-Assistance" (2018). Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections. 91. https://fordham.bepress.com/phil_babich/91 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Solicitude: Towards a Heideggerian Care Ethics-of-Assistance Babette Babich What is the orientation of care if not to reinstate the human in his/her essence? - Heidegger, Letter on Humanism Friends and enemies Heidegger has been criticized for lacking an ethics, a point of view Heidegger himself highlights as perhaps the key to his well-known but elusive Letter on Humanism, a response offered in reply to a letter written to him after the war by Jean Beaufret, a scholar of ancient philosophy. Certainly, in this post-war era (where Sartre’s 1945 Paris lecture ‘Existentialism Is a Humanism’ sought to defend the ethical credentials of existentialism in the face of the charge of nihihsm) and more so today in the wake of the Black Notebooks scandal, Heidegger’s philosophy falters on ethical grounds as on political complications.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Heidegger: “The Letter on Humanism” a Series of Lectures by Paul Livingston, Villanova University March 2, 2005
    Martin Heidegger: “The Letter on Humanism” A series of lectures by Paul Livingston, Villanova University March 2, 2005 The Letter on Humanism, written in 1947 in response to questions circulating about the relationship of Heidegger’s philosophy of Being to humanism, Christianity, Marxism, and the new “philosophy of existence” expounded by Sartre, Jaspers, and others, has been called Heidegger’s “greatest effort.” It was written at a time of great personal struggle for Heidegger: he had just been indefinitely banned from teaching following the Nazi war-crimes hearings, and he had undergone a kind of emotional breakdown as a result. Nevertheless, the Letter on Humanism virtually catalogues the most important strands of Heidegger’s entire later philosophy – the meaning of the history of Being, the way Heidegger sees to the re-awakening of that history, its relation to the philosophical tradition, the meaning of action, the role of technology, art, and language in the historical destiny of Being, and above all the need of a new thinking to prepare that destiny. The essay contains some of Heidegger’s most memorable language. In it, we can see especially clearly the role of reflection about language in preparing a new consideration of Being that will make the leap outside the tradition of metaphysics, which has hitherto determined all of our language. The quest for a new language will be so important to Heidegger that he will even spell important words, like Being, in antiquated and strange ways, to show that he uses them outside the closure of metaphysics. “Thinking accomplishes the relation of Being to the essence of man.
    [Show full text]