Europe and Social Democracy SOCIAL DEMOCRACY READER 4 SOCIAL DEMOCRACYREADER4 Social Democracy and Europe Etal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Europe and Social Democracy SOCIAL DEMOCRACY READER 4 SOCIAL DEMOCRACYREADER4 Social Democracy and Europe Etal Europe and Social Democracy SOCIAL DEMOCRACY READER 4 SOCIAL DEMOCRACYREADER4 Social Democracy Social Europe and Cäcilie Schildberg etal. ISBN 978-3-86498-844-8 2nd, updated edition, 1st English edition Published by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung German edition: Political Academy, Bonn, February 2014 English edition: Division for International Cooperation, Berlin, May 2014 The fi rst (German) edition was supported fi nancially by the Erich-Brost-Schenkung. »One of the advantages of democracy that no other form of state can substitute is discussion; only that enables the voters to take their bearings. That alone forces them to take a position.« (Erich Brost 1951) Editing: Jochen Dahm, Tobias Gombert, Christian Krell, Cäcilie Schildberg, Martin Timpe, Anne Wagenführ Contact: [email protected] / [email protected] / [email protected] Printing: Mauser + Tröster GbR, Mössingen Layout and typesetting: DIE.PROJEKTOREN, Berlin Title photo: Sven Hopp, fotolia.com The authors of the individual sections of this publication are responsible for the views it contains. The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in all instances. SOCIAL DEMOCRACY READER 4 Cäcilie Schildberg et al. Europe and Social Democracy CONTENTS Foreword to the First English-language Edition 4 1. Introduction 6 2. Social Democracy – A Compass for Europe 10 2.1. Basic Values 12 2.2. Fundamental Rights 16 2.3. Europe and Social Democracy: Three Connections 20 2.4. Five Principles of Policy on Europe 24 2.5. Social Europe 32 3. Europe Today: How It Came into Being – What It Is 40 3.1. Democracy: Institutional Construction of the EU 48 3.2. Prosperity: The European Single Market 62 3.3. Social Equality: European Social Policy 73 3.4. Sustainability: From Environmental Law to Sustainable Development 82 3.5. Peace: European Foreign and Security Policy 85 4. Europe Tomorrow: Outlook and Reform Proposals 93 4.1. Strengthening European Democracy 94 4.2. Promoting European Prosperity 99 4.3. Strengthening the Social Dimension 105 4.4. Ensuring Sustainability 109 4.5. Strengthening the Foreign Policy Profi le 113 5. Comparing the Parties‘ Policies on Europe 122 5.1. CDU 122 5.2. FDP 125 5.3. SPD 127 5.4. Bündnis 90/The Greens 129 5.5. The Left 132 5.6. Summary 135 6. Debates on Europe: Germany, United Kingdom, France, Poland and Greece 136 6.1. Germany 138 6.2. United Kingdom 140 6.3. France 142 6.4. Poland 145 6.5. Greece 150 7. For Further Refl ection 153 The Ten Biggest Misconceptions Concerning the EU 155 Bibliography 156 Authors/Editors 162 20 Key Names and Terms 163 FOREWORD to the First English language Edition The history of the European Union is sustained by the fascinating idea of peace and freedom in a united continent. In 2012 the EU was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, which was both recognition and a challenge. However, it is also true that these days one often hears the EU mentioned in connection with the word »crisis«. When the unregulated fi nancial markets collapsed in 2008 the lending banks were bailed out by the state. Public debt rose enormously as a consequence and some countries have experienced problems obtaining new loans: this is the basis of what is known as the »euro-crisis«. However, this is misleading because the euro exchange rate has been stable for years. The crisis cannot be denied, but this book seeks to inspire hope. The Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung is committed to the goals of social democracy and the ideals of the labour movement. Social democracy is a universal idea. It is borne by the conviction that the confl ict between labour and capital shapes the political debate and reality not only in one country but in all countries. In a time of internationally interwoven economies, global challenges and world-encom- passing communication networks this is more pertinent than ever. For social democrats European unifi cation is thus a key project. Freedom, justice and solidarity: cooperation between European neighbours offers the chance of realising these fundamental social democratic values – more than any country could manage alone. A social Europe – that is the vision that sustains this reader. The path towards a genuinely democratic and social Europe may be long, but despite all the problems it is robust: the EU is the project of regional coopera- tion that, by international comparison, has achieved the highest level of mutual interrelations to date. It is important for the future of the EU to learn from its history. Other regional alliances can use its background circumstances, problems and opportunities as examples both good and bad. Thus this reader is now being published in English. It is offered as a helping hand for political decision-makers and opinion formers in the more than 100 countries in which the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung promotes democracy and development, and contributes to peace and security. The idea underlying the EU is magnifi cent. 4 This book constitutes an invitation to tackle in detail and in various policy areas how this magnifi cent idea can best be realised. At this point we would like to direct the reader towards the work of the Fried- rich-Ebert-Stiftung’s International Policy Analysis unit (IPA), from which this volume has benefi ted considerably. We would like to thank Gero Maaß, Cilia Ebert-Libeskind, Jan Niklas Engels, Christos Katsioulis and Björn Hacker for their council and comments. Special thanks go to Cäcilie Schildberg, Martin Timpe, Tobias Gombert and Anne Wagenführ. Cäcilie Schildberg, as the main author, wrote the major part of this Reader. Martin Timpe, Tobias Gombert and Anne Wagenführ have contributed in manifold ways to the editorial work. We would also like to thank Michael Dauderstädt and Michael Fischer for their advice on the conception of the book and Severin Fischer, Julian Schwartzkopff, Kaki Bali, Ronja Kempin and Niels Gatzke for their various contributions to brin- ging the volume up to date. Finally, we should mention the help provided by Angelica Schwall-Dürren, cur- rently European Affairs Minister of North Rhine Westphalia. We are extremely grateful for her collaboration in the conception of the book and her valuable remarks on the fi rst German edition. Our thanks go to her and all those who participated; any shortcomings are entirely our responsibility. The symbol of the Academy of Social Democracy is a compass. By means of the Academy and what it has to offer the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung would like to provide a framework within which perspectives and orientations might become clearer. We would be delighted if you were to take advantage of what we have to offer to try to fi nd your political path. Citizens’ debating with and committing themselves to one another constitute the very lifeblood of social democracy. Dr. Christian Krell Jochen Dahm Head Project Leader Academy of Social Democracy Social Democracy Readers Bonn, April 2014 5 1. INTRODUCTION Everybody has an opinion on Europe1. To take just a few examples of the range of views: Peace »Europe – for me it’s a guarantee of peace. I’ve experienced the Second World War, destruction and genocide. Europe has brought us peace, from the Coal and Steel Union up to the present. Today, Europe can contribute a lot to ensur- ing social peace – also in Germany.« (Renate, 78, pensioner) »Europe – for me it is not a force for peace. The EU should do much more for disarmament.« (Torsten, 23, student) This broad spectrum of opinions also characterises other areas of Europe, for example, the continent’s democratic development: Democracy »For me as a social scientist Europe is an exciting political integration project. Never in history has there been such a successful attempt to integrate an alliance of states over a period of decades by democratic means. At the same time, the project is under threat of citizens’ losing interest in it. Voter turnout in European elections is alarmingly low. Democratisation must be brought into focus if Europe is to have a future.« (Karla, social scientist, 40) »Europe – I don’t know much about it. But I’ve been on a school exchange visit to France and I’ve been on holiday with my parents in many other European countries. I’ve made some new friends there. It’s cool that I can travel everywhere without any hassle and that we understand one another. Otherwise Europe doesn’t really interest me that much.« (Martina, 18, school student) On the issue of developing prosperity: Prosperity »Europe – it’s a great thing. I have a small solar technology company. It’s small but we produce cutting-edge technology and we can now sell it as far as Portu- gal, instead of only going there on holiday.« (Hans, 52, self-employed) 1 Europe, of course, goes beyond the member states of the European Union. By »Europe« we mean here Europe’s economic and political integration in the form of the EC/EU. The terms »Europe« and »EU« are 6 used synonymously in what follows. Any deviations from this will be clearly noted. »Europe – it doesn’t interest me. I’m a German. Also, we should never have given up the Deutschmark.« (Georg, 62, pensioner) On the issue of social equity: »Europe – it doesn’t do me any good. I work as a fi tter in a town near the Pol- Social equity ish border. If Polish fi tters with their lower cost of living push down prices how will I be able to make a living? And when I look at what it all costs. We’re cut- ting social benefi ts left, right and centre and yet we transfer millions of euros to Brussels.
Recommended publications
  • Lithuania Political Briefing: the Polls Indicate a Change of Governing Coalition After the Parliamentary Elections Linas Eriksonas
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 32, No. 1 (LT) September 2020 Lithuania political briefing: The polls indicate a change of governing coalition after the parliamentary elections Linas Eriksonas 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 The polls indicate a change of governing coalition after the parliamentary elections On 11 October Lithuania will hold the first round of the parliamentary elections. The second round will take place two weeks later, on 25 October. The increasing number of infected cases by COVID-19 coincided with the final month of the election campaign. It put restrictions on the way the political campaign has been led by the participants of the elections such as obligatory wearing of the masks when meeting the voters, preventing the effective use of face- to-face contact and door-to-door canvassing in political campaigning. Below is an overview of the political landscape within which the elections are taking place, outlining the voter preferences for and their sympathies towards the main political parties and indicating the possibilities for different yet highly unpredictable electoral outcomes. The results of the latest polls are briefly discussed, identifying the main difficulties in using the poll data for a more reliable prediction of the election results. The Lithuanian political scene is roughly divided into two halves. The governing coalition represents one half. It is led by the Lithuanian Farmers and Greens Union with two minor coalition partners (Electoral Action of Poles in Lithuania – Christian Families Alliance and the Social Democratic Labour Party).
    [Show full text]
  • Name Index to Photograph Collection
    Name Index to Photograph Collection What follows is a name index only to the Finnish American Historical Archives' Historic Photograph Collection (Old Topical File). See Archival Finding Aids for a complete listing of this collection. When more than one surname was indicated concerning one photo, the entry with the first surname lists all of the individuals, while each additional surname is also listed individually. The metadata concerning each photograph is limited to whatever information is available on the object, often revealing limitations to the information about each object (for example, a mounted card photo that simply states "Mrs. Maki," or an group photo that only includes surnames). Another limitation is the legibility and clarity of the handwriting. This name index was created by Larissa Poyhonen in the summer of 2010, while performing preservation work on this collection. Megan Ott transcribed the Knights of Kaleva Convention Photograph in November, 2010. The index was edited and prepared for the Internet by Kent Randell. This index also includes the Knights of Kaleva Convention Photograph, August, 1910 The index also includes the pictures included in the book Tervehdys Suomelle, published in Brooklyn, N.Y. in 1920. Folder name Name Notes 002 Indvid – A- Aartila, Toivo Rudyard Am 062- Orgs.- Temperance- Aartilla, Toivo Marquette, Mich; 1917 Michigan Tervehdys Suomelle book Aatila, Julle p. 37 (1920) 021- Postcards- Finland- Imig. & Abbot, Mr & Mrs. Robert Collection Folkways 002 Indvid – A- Grand Marais, Mich., 50th Abramson, Axel and Helga Am Anniversary 1964, #12997 002 Indvid – A- Ahlman, Mrs; Hakola, Maria; Ahlman, Newberry, Mich. Am Pastor Lauri. Tervehdys Suomelle book Aho, Antti p.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinema and Politics
    Cinema and Politics Cinema and Politics: Turkish Cinema and The New Europe Edited by Deniz Bayrakdar Assistant Editors Aslı Kotaman and Ahu Samav Uğursoy Cinema and Politics: Turkish Cinema and The New Europe, Edited by Deniz Bayrakdar Assistant Editors Aslı Kotaman and Ahu Samav Uğursoy This book first published 2009 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2009 by Deniz Bayrakdar and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-0343-X, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-0343-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Images and Tables ......................................................................... viii Acknowledgements .................................................................................... ix Preface ........................................................................................................ xi Introduction ............................................................................................. xvii ‘Son of Turks’ claim: ‘I’m a child of European Cinema’ Deniz Bayrakdar Part I: Politics of Text and Image Chapter One ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • January 13, 2009 (XVIII:1) Carl Theodor Dreyer VAMPYR—DER TRAUM DES ALLAN GREY (1932, 75 Min)
    January 13, 2009 (XVIII:1) Carl Theodor Dreyer VAMPYR—DER TRAUM DES ALLAN GREY (1932, 75 min) Directed by Carl Theodor Dreyer Produced by Carl Theodor Dreyer and Julian West Cinematography by Rudolph Maté and Louis Née Original music by Wolfgang Zeller Film editing by Tonka Taldy Art direction by Hermann Warm Special effects by Henri Armand Allan Grey…Julian West Der Schlossherr (Lord of the Manor)…Maurice Schutz Gisèle…Rena Mandel Léone…Sybille Schmitz Village Doctor…Jan Heironimko The Woman from the Cemetery…Henriette Gérard Old Servant…Albert Bras Foreign Correspondent (1940). Some of the other films he shot His Wife….N. Barbanini were The Lady from Shanghai (1947), It Had to Be You (1947), Down to Earth (1947), Gilda (1946), They Got Me Covered CARL THEODOR DREYER (February 3, 1889, Copenhagen, (1943), To Be or Not to Be (1942), It Started with Eve (1941), Denmark—March 20, 1968, Copenhagen, Denmark) has 23 Love Affair (1939), The Adventures of Marco Polo (1938), Stella Directing credits, among them Gertrud (1964), Ordet/The Word Dallas (1937), Come and Get It (1936), Dodsworth (1936), A (1955), Et Slot i et slot/The Castle Within the Castle (1955), Message to Garcia (1936), Charlie Chan's Secret (1936), Storstrømsbroen/The Storstrom Bridge (1950), Thorvaldsen Metropolitan (1935), Dressed to Thrill (1935), Dante's Inferno (1949), De nåede færgen/They Caught the Ferry (1948), (1935), Le Dernier milliardaire/The Last Billionaire/The Last Landsbykirken/The Danish Church (1947), Kampen mod Millionaire (1934), Liliom (1934), Paprika (1933),
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Mp 1937 1929
    FREE WEEKLY SUPPLEMENT TO OUR REVIEW NO. 127 (1937) MAY 10, 1929 IN WARSAW. (ISSN 2544-0187) CHILDREN’S AND YOUTH PAPER EDITED BY JANUSZ KORCZAK PUBLISHED EVERY FRIDAY MORNING CORRESPONDENCE AND MATERIALS SHOULD BE SENT TO THE LITTLE REVIEW NEWSROOM WARSAW, NO. 7 NOWOLIPKI STREET MY IMPORTANT MOMENTS (A page) Every person has many important play, because if someone’s ten, they your colors – red and scarlet, blue I found many new friends, and they heard some kind of a through in her moments in their lifetimes. Every are not nine or eight anymore.” and purple, green and aquamarine. all gave me many beautiful and great throat, through which she passed single one of them is important in its I started thinking about organizing I want to see you all, my moments. moments. When we walked together, her voice – “Altwark!” – with the own way, every single one is differ- my life and how it was going to turn out. I call all of you beautiful, both the bad we talked about one interesting matter. same tone, unchanged even after ent, and there are no identical ones. I had my hair tied with a wide red and good ones, sad and happy, grey The evening was cold and windy. We several years, still hoarse, deep Some of them are changes or spiritual ribbon; I wore a green wool dress with and emerald… Every single one of got to a corner and said our goodbyes, and monotonous voice with its own transformations. a red pattern on it, high boots and you left a deep mark on my soul.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Europarties and Euroscepticism in the 2014 European Elections
    More Europe Vs. No Europe: Europarties and Euroscepticism in the 2014 European Elections Essays by David J. Bailey, Eleonora Poli, Ania Skrzypek More Europe Vs. No Europe: Europarties and Euroscepticism in the 2014 European Elections Italianieuropei: Hedwig Giusto and Virginia Cavaliere Graphic design: Emanuele Ragnisco, Mekkanografici Associati Page layout: Futura Grafica 70 Srl ISbn 978-88-89988-69-5 © 2014 Foundation for European Progressive Studies and Fondazione Italianieuropei Published with the financial support of the European Parliament CONTENTS 7 Foreword 9 Eurosceptic Vs. Europhile Parties: A Scenario of the next European Parliamentary Elections Eleonora Poli 25 Politicising Europe: Political Leadership and Courage of Europarties? Ania Skrzypek 73 On Political Will in the Era of Austerity David J. Bailey 5 Foreword In 2013 the Foundation for European Progressive Studies, the Fondazione Italianieuropei and the Rome office of the Friedrich- Ebert-Stiftung co-sponsored an international seminar entitled “Democratic Legitimacy and Political Leadership in the Euro- pean Union. Towards the 2014 European Elections”. On that oc- casion the discussion, moving from the impact that the economic and political downturn had on the EU citizens’ disenchantment with politics and democracy, both at the national and European levels, focused on the need to politicise the EU dimension and provide the common institutions with that democratic legitima- tion which they were largely missing. The discussion focused in particular on two factors that, it was argued, could contribute to the achievement of those goals: the direct election of the President of the European Commission, and the enhancement of the Europarties and the creation of a competitive party system.
    [Show full text]
  • 9781447201182.Pdf
    1: BORDERLANDS Perhaps appropriately for a secret agent, the deceptions and confu- sions that surround Christine’s life start with her birth.* One story has it that Christine was born at the Skarbek family estate on a stormy spring evening in 1915, and that her arrival coincided with the appearance of Venus, the evening star, in the sky. As a result she was nicknamed ‘Vesperale’. In an even more romantic version of events, she was born ‘in the wild borderlands between Poland and Russia’, to a family that was noble, ‘tough, used to invasions, warfare, Cossacks, bandits and wolves’.1 In fact Christine arrived in the world on Friday 1 May 1908. One of her father’s childhood nicknames for her was ‘little star’, but she was born at her mother’s family house on Zielna Street, in central Warsaw, now the capital of Poland. Then, however, Warsaw was technically in Russia. Poland as we know it today was not a recognized country: apart from a brief reappearance, courtesy of Napoleon, for more than a century Poland had been partitioned into three sections, each of them subsumed into the empires of Russia, Austro-Hungary and Prussia. Christine was born into a family of aristocratic patriots, loyal to a country that would not officially exist again until she was ten years old. She was a small and seemingly frail baby, so frail in fact that her parents feared for her life, and she was hastily baptized Maria Krystyna Janina Skarbek by a local priest less than two weeks after her birth.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Educator Experts
    Innovative Educator Experts 2019-2020 The Microsoft Innovative Educator (MIE) Expert program is an exclusive program created to recognize global educator visionaries who are using technology to pave the way for their peers for better learning and student outcomes. Microsoft Innovative Educator Experts Names are sorted by region, then country, then last name. Table of Contents Contents Asia Pacific Region ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Bangladesh ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Brunei .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Cambodia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Indonesia .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Korea ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Valence Side of the EU: Advocating for National Interests in Europe
    The Valence Side of the EU: Advocating for National Interests in Europe Luca Carrieri ([email protected]) and Davide Angelucci, ([email protected])1 2 Abstract In the last decades, many challenger parties have tried to mobilize a conflict on European integration, increasing their entrepreneurial efforts on the EU issues. In fact, the permissive consensus on integration policies has progressively vanished, with citizens expressing polarized attitudes towards the EU. As a consequence, the issue competition on European integration has been mainly conceived as a positional struggle, where voter/party preferences are ordered along a Pro-/-Anti-EU general dimension. However, some parties may be prone to deploy a different strategy, mobilizing valence aspects related to the EU. These strategies revolve around party competence in advocating for national interests at the EU level, which has been considered as a generally desired goal of domestic electorates. Relying on their claimed superior competence to defend national interests within the EU, parties adopt a valence frame on the EU to avoid divisions within their electorates. However, it is still unclear how much and whether the voters have electorally responded to EU valence issues. This paper advances the following research questions: Have EU valence issues affected electoral preferences? Have EU valence issues outweighed the EU positional ones in explaining the voting preferences? Which parties have been more likely to benefit from EU valence issues? To answer these questions, we use an innovative dataset, the Issue Competition Comparative Project (2017-2018), including information on voters’ attitudes on a number of issues. Most importantly, the dataset has tapped public opinion attitudes on both EU positional and valence issues in Italy and France.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Who Are the Europeans and How Does This Matter for Politics?1
    //FS2/CUP/3-PAGINATION/CKZ/2-PROOFS/3B2/9780521883016C06.3D 132 [132–166] 7.8.2008 7:58AM 6 Who are the Europeans and how does this matter for politics?1 NEIL FLIGSTEIN Introduction The European Union has produced a remarkable set of agreements to guide the political interactions of countries across Europe in the past fifty years. These agreements have produced collective rules governing market transactions of all varieties, created a single currency, estab- lished a rule of law that includes a European court, and promoted increased interactions for people who live within the boundaries of Europe. Moreover, the EU has expanded from six to twenty-seven countries. The endpoint of the EU has been left intentionally vague and can be encapsulated by the ambiguous phrase “toward an ever closer union.” Much of the political criticism of the EU has focussed on the lack of transparency in its procedures and in its accountability to a larger demo- cratic public (Baun 1996; Dinan 2002; McCormick 2002). Many of Europe’s citizens have little knowledge about the workings of the EU (Gabel 1998). This lack of “connectedness” to the EU by ordinary citizens has caused scholars to try to understand why a European identity (equivalent to a “national” identity), a European “civil society,” and a European politics have been so slow to emerge (Laffan et al. 2000). The main focus of these efforts is why, after fifty years of the integration project, there is so little evidence of public attitudes that reflect more feelings of solidarity across Europe. Even among those who work in Brussels, there are mixed feelings about being European (Hooghe 2005; Beyer 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Guy VERHOFSTADT* “More Europe Is the Solution…”
    Revista_comunicare_31.qxd 5/26/2014 2:43 PM Page 67 Guy VERHOFSTADT* “More Europe is the solution…” Lectio Prima delivered by Guy Verhofstadt, MEP, Leader of the ALDE Group in the Eu- ropean Parliament, on the occasion of receiving the Doctor Honoris Causa award from the National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest (Romania). The awarding ceremony took place on November 8, 2013, as part of the „European Citizen- ship Week”. This initiative carried out by the NUPSPA comprised a series of events to mark 20 years from the introduction of the European citizenship through the Treaty of Maastricht. Guy Verhofstadt, leader of the Liberals and Democrats, is one of the most influential voic- es in the European Parliament. He is currently running for President of the European Com- mission in the 2014 European elections. Throughout his political career, Verhofstadt has been a keen promoter of reforms within the EU; he has fought for a faster decision-making process and has supported the active consultation and involvement of European citizens in matters regarding the future of the European Union. In his address to the academic community of the National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Guy Verhofstadt plainly stated that the EU is currently at a cross- roads and that a decision has to be made with regard to its future. The options available de- fine the role that the EU seeks to play in the globalized world: either the EU becomes more integrated and fit to cope with the new rules of the game or it remains an intergovernmental organization that “continues to think within its borders”.
    [Show full text]