Chomhairle Chontae Na Gaillimhe Minutes Of

CHOMHAIRLE CHONTAE NA GAILLIMHE

MINUTES OF MONTHLY MEETING OF GALWAY COUNTY COUNCIL HELD AT ÁRAS AN CHONTAE, ON MONDAY 27th FEBRUARY, 2017 AT 11.00 A.M.

CATHAOIRLEACH: Cllr. M. Connolly, Cathaoirleach of the County of Galway I LATHAIR FREISIN:

BAILL: Cllrs. T. Broderick, D. Burke, J. Byrne, N. Byrne, I. Canning, J. Charity, B. Connelly, D. Connolly, G. Cronnelly, Comh. S. Ó Cualáín, Cllrs. J. Cuddy, S. Cunniffe, S. Donnellan, A. Donohue, M. Fahy, P. Feeney, G. Finnerty, M. Finnerty, T. Healy, M. Hoade, P. Hynes, D. Joyce, F. Kearney, P. Keaveney, D. Killilea, M. Kinane, M. Maher, E. Mannion, J. McClearn, K. McHugh, T. McHugh, M. Noone, P. Roche, N. Thomas, Comh S. Ó Tuairisg, Cllrs. S. Walsh, T. Welby OIFIGIGH: Mr. K. Kelly, Chief Executive (Interim); Mr. J.Cullen, Director of Service; Ms. C. McConnell, Messrs. M. Owens and M. Timmins, Acting Directors of Service; Mr. G. Mullarkey, Head of Finance; Ms. E. Dolan, Acting County Secretary & Meetings Administrator; Mr. S. Kilroy Acting Staff Officer; Ms. G. Healy, Staff Officer.

Thosnaigh an Cruinniú leis an Paidir.

RESOLUTIONS OF SYMPATHY 2947

The Cathaoirleach proposed that a Vote of Sympathy be extended to Cllr. Eileen Mannion and the Mannion Family on the recent death of Eileen’s father, Mr. Paddy Mannion. Cllrs. McClearn, Hoade, Healy, Welby, Hynes, Comh. Ó Tuairisg and Ó Cualáin paid tribute to the late Paddy Mannion, stating that he was gentleman and good businessman who always looked after his customers well. The Chief Executive, on his own behalf and on behalf of the Executive and Staff of the Council, joined in the expressions of sympathy. Cllr. Hoade proposed that a Vote of Sympathy be extended to the family of Mr. Michael Kelly of Corrandulla who passed away suddenly the previous week. The Cathaoirleach, Cllr. M. Connolly also wished to support this Vote of Sympathy.

Cllr. Fahy extended a Vote of Sympathy on the family of Mr. Fred O’Connor of Oranmore who passed away earlier in the month. A resolution of sympathy was also extended to the following:

Eugene Mc Keigue, Coolnageera, Portumna, Co. Galway. Tricia Heneghan, Knockdoe Beg, Claregalway. Monica Flaherty, Lakeside Park, Loughrea, Co. Galway. Mary O’Connor, Main Street, Oranmore, Co. Galway. Peggy Tierney, Rusheeney, Oughterard, Co. Galway. Josephine & Patricia Ní Flaharta, Barr, Rusheen, Ros-a-Mhil, Baile na hAbhainn, Co. na Gaillimhe. Jimí Ó Ceannabhainn, Cill Chiarain, Conamara, Co. na Gaillimhe. Chrissie Nevin, Killaghmore, Kilconnell, Ballinasloe, Co. Galway. Tom King, Rosshill, Merlin Park, Galway. Gerry Mc Inerney, Carrowmoneash, Oranmore, Co. Galway. Margaret Monaghan, Liscaninane, Claregalway, Co. Galway. Betty Madden, Lackaghmore, Turloughmore, Co. Galway. Josephine Kelly, Drumgriffin, Corrandulla, Co. Galway. Liam Creaven, Belclare, Tuam, Co. Galway. Pat O’ Halloran & Family, Weir Road, Tuam, Co. Galway. Mary Reilly, 20 Trinity Court, Tuam, Co Galway.

The Cathaoirleach proposed that the Meeting be adjourned for five minutes as a mark of respect to Mr. Paddy Mannion and for all the deceased. The Meeting resumed following the adjournment.

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF THE MONTHLY MEETING HELD ON 30TH JANUARY, 2017 2948

Cllr. Cunniffe referred to the debate which took place regarding Notice of Motion No. 21 which he had proposed at the January Monthly Meeting of the Council. He said that the Minutes record that Cllr. B. Connelly said “a Greenway is already being proposed on an alternative route in the area, which he understands has the broad agreement of the Irish Farmers Association”. Cllr. Cunniffe contested that the IFA is in broad agreement with the alternative route mentioned by Cllr. B. Connelly.

Cllr. B. Connelly advised that when he in response to the Motion at the January Monthly Meeting of the Council, he spoke with regard to an alternative route of a Greenway which he said had the broad support of the IFA.

The Minutes of the Monthly Meeting of the Council held on 30th January 2017, were APPROVED by the Council and signed by the Cathaoirleach, on the PROPOSAL of Cllr. McClearn and SECONDED by Cllr. Burke, subject to the following amendment on Page 21 in relation to Notice of Motion 21: Cllr. B. Connelly said that while he supported the concept of

Greenways, he believed that incurring expenditure on a feasibility study for a Greenway on the route indicated by Cllr. Cunniffe would be futile as a Greenway is already being proposed on an alternative route in the area, which he understands has the broad support of the Irish Farmers Association (IFA).

Cllr. Fahy raised the issue of traffic congestion at Parkmore stating that jobs could be put in jeopardy if traffic gridlock at the industrial estate is not remedied. He asked that the Chief Executive liaise with the Chief Executive of the City Council and also Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) in order to solve this major problem.

Cllrs. Cuddy, Noone, Hoade, Feeney, J. Byrne, Kinane, Charity and Cronnelly also expressed their concern regarding the critical traffic delays being experienced by businesses and employees entering and exiting the industrial estate.

Cllr. Kinane referred to Irish Rural Link which is a national network of organisations and individuals campaigning for sustainable rural development in Ireland and Europe. She suggested that a representative of Irish Rural Link be invited to make a presentation to the Members. Cllr. Walsh supported Cllr. Kinane in this regard.

The Cathaoirleach referred to the Galway Transport Strategy which was presented to the Members at the December 2016 Monthly Meeting of the Council and he said that a proactive Transport Strategy needs to be developed for the whole of County Galway, in conjunction with both Galway County Council and Galway City Council.

The Chief Executive replied to the Members stating that, both Galway County and Galway City Councils are working on finding a solution to the traffic congestion at Parkmore, with Galway City Council as the Lead Authority under a Section 85 Agreement. He said that both Authorities are working closely with businesses in the area; with the National Transport Authority; the Minister for Transport; the IDA and TII in order to put in place an effective solution. He noted that the Galway City Ring Road would provide a solution for the whole of Parkmore into the future. The Chief Executive underlined that a number of measures are being proactively considered which have varying timescales attached and assured the Members that every avenue is being pursued in order to solve this major problem.

Comh. Ó Tuairisg raised the issue of the N59 Bunakill to Oughterard Road and he asked for an update regarding plans for the much needed resurfacing works to be carried out on this stretch of road.

Cllrs. Healy, Walsh and Thomas expressed their disappointment at the lack of progress on carrying out essential repairs to the N59 Road.

Mr. Timmins said it is the Council’s intention to overlay the section from Bunakill to Claremont, Oughterard during 2017, in three tranches. He said the Council must go through Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) on this national route, in order to get the works

3 approved, therefore necessitating the completion of a Design Plan for the works it is the intention of the Council to get all of the overlay works to the N59 underway in 2017.

In reply to Cllr. Canning, Ms. McConnell said that the Council secured €392,000 in CLÁR Measure 1 and 2 funding to be invested in Roads and one playground in 2017.

CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS 2949

The Report of the Corporate Policy Group Meeting held on 9th September 2016, was APPROVED by the Council on the PROPOSAL of Cllr. T. McHugh, SECONDED by Cllr. Donnellan.

The Report of the Corporate Policy Group Meeting held on 11th November 2016, was APPROVED by the Council on the PROPOSAL of Cllr. McClearn, SECONDED by Cllr. T. McHugh.

SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS 2950

On the PROPOSAL of Cllr. Killilea, SECONDED by Cllr. Roche, it was AGREED that the Standing Orders be suspended in order that Notice of Motion No. 23 on the Agenda be taken next.

Cllr. Cunniffe referred to his Notice of Motion No. 23 which PROPOSED that “Galway County Council approves the carrying out of a Feasibility Study on the establishment of a Greenway as a complimentary use of the disused railway alignment between Athenry, Ballyglunin, Tuam, Kilconly and Milltown. The funding for this Feasibility Study should be sought from the Department of Transport, Department of Environment or other source outside of the Council. The parameters of the Feasibility Study will be drawn up and approved with the expertise of Galway County Council. The establishment of this Greenway would in no way compromise the future provision of a railway service should it ever come to pass, on the contrary, a Greenway would protect the alignment for any further use. A Greenway would be a wonderful local public amenity and also provide a substantial economic injection to the whole area and bring employment to rural areas where all other efforts to create jobs have failed”. Cllr. Killilea SECONDED this proposal. He said that the funding for the Feasibility Study would need to be sought through the Council, and it was not intended that the Council would fund the Study.

Cllr. Feeney expressed the view that the route proposed by Cllr. Cunniffe was not wide enough to accommodate both the railway line and a Greenway and he said was not in favour of the proposal.

Cllr. McClearn considered the proposal was contrary to national legislation and therefore, funding would not be provided by the Department of Transport, Tourism & Sport (DTTAS) to carry out the Study.

Cllr. Kearney and Comh. Ó Cualáin and B. Connelly expressed their opposition to the proposal. Cllrs. Roche, K. McHugh and Hynes spoke in favour of the proposal. Cllr. Broderick said he was informed that a helpful presentation was made at a recent Meeting of Tuam Municipal District Council in relation to Greenway options and he PROPOSED that the other Municipal District Council’s receive this presentation also. This proposal was SECONDED by Cllr. Feeney.

Cllr. Killilea asked if the Proposer would amend the proposal so that the presentation be made to the full Plenary Council and Cllr. B. Connelly supported Cllr. Killilea in this regard. It was then AGREED to propose that the presentation in relation to Greenway options be made to the Plenary Council.

Cllr. M. Connolly expressed the view that a County and Regional Transport Strategy needs to be put in place. He said that while he respected the views of the Members, he was not in favour of a Greenway being put in place beside a railway line.

Mr. Kelly said it was not clear if the proposal was that the Council make the application for funding or if the Council use its expertise to assist others to make the application for funding. He said if the Local Authority was to be involved, it must be clear that all of the Members are in support of the proposal and that the proposal is aligned with policies of the Council. He said that the Minister’s Office is working on a Policy in relation to Greenways and this is expected to be published in the coming period.

Cllr. Cunniffe said that DTTAS will only deal with Statutory Authorities. He said that the distinguishing factor of the proposed Greenway is that the route is not on private lands and a huge opportunity exists to use this alignment as it poses no infringement on landowners. He said that a Feasibility Study is merely a mechanism to determine if the proposed Greenway has potential and he could not understand the opposition to the proposal.

The Cathaoirleach asked if the Members agreed with Cllr. Cunniffe’s proposal. Some Members indicated that they were not in agreement with the proposal. The Cathaoirleach called for a vote on Cllr. Cunniffe’s proposal. Ms. E.Dolan asked Members to ‘re-sign in’ in advance of a Vote and confirmed a quorum for the Vote to proceed. The result of the vote was as follows: For: Cllrs. Killilea, Charity, Fahy, Hynes, Donnellan, Healy, Cronnelly, K. McHugh, M. Finnerty, Roche, Cunniffe, Canning, Noone, Thomas, Walsh and Welby. [16]

Against: Cllrs. Donohue, Mannion, McClearn, M. Connolly, Broderick, Comh. Ó Tuairisg, Cllrs. B. Connelly, Kearney, J. Byrne, N. Byrne, T. McHugh, D. Connolly, Cuddy, Hoade, [16] Feeney and Comh. Ó Cualáin.

Abstain: Cllrs. Joyce, Kinane, Burke, Keaveney and G. Finnerty [5]

As the Vote resulted in an equal number in favour and against, the Cathaoirleach exercised his Casting Vote in accordance with Standing Orders, and he voted against the Proposal. As a result of the Vote, the Cathaoirleach declared the Proposal Defeated.

TO CONSIDER REPORT UNDER PART 8 OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 2001 (AS AMENDED) – FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 10 NO. 3 BEDROOM, SEMI DETACHED UNITS IN GARBALLY DRIVE, BALLINASLOE, CO. GALWAY. 2951 [Chief Executive’s Report dated January 2017, available to the Members on the Extranet] [Flood Risk Assessment dated July 2016, prepared by Tobin Consulting Engineers, available to the Members on the Extranet] [Report dated 22nd February 2017, prepared by Tobin Consulting Engineers, available to the Members on the Extranet]

Mr. Owens said that this Item was on the Agenda for the January Monthly Meeting of the Council and was deferred by the Members pending receipt of further information in relation to concerns of flood risk at the field adjacent to the site of the proposed development at Garbally Drive, Ballinasloe. He drew the Members’ attention to Report dated 22nd February 2017, prepared by Tobin Consulting Engineers, and in particular the Summary/Conclusion on Page 6 where it is stated that there is no evidence of a Turlough being present in the field to the north of the proposed development, that the proposal to construct 10 new dwellings may slightly reduce flood risk in the field and that the pluvial flooding in the field in question does not impact any of the existing or proposed properties in Garbally Drive, Ballinasloe.

Mr. Owens informed the Members that as the Item was deferred from the January Monthly Meeting, and bearing in mind the 6-week period for approval by the Council, it was necessary for the Members to make a decision on the proposal at today’s Monthly Meeting or otherwise the Part 8 would fall in respect of this housing project.

He said that this housing project represents a €1.7m capital investment in Ballinasloe, to meet existing housing need and the recommendation is that, Members approve the proposal in order to allow the procurement process to commence, following which it would be expected to commence construction of the houses in May/June 2017 and to complete construction by the end of 2018.

Cllr. M. Finnerty said that the Residents of Garbally Drive had made a reasonable request to defer the Part 8 proposal in January 2017 and the Members had deferred the Item pending further investigations regarding flooding concerns. He said he was prepared to be guided by the assurances given and he thanked Mr. Owens for outlining the findings of the Report of Tobin Consulting Engineers dated 22nd February 2017. He said that the Residents are arranging that an independent Hydrologist’s Report be prepared regarding the proposed development, however he acknowledged that as this Report is not completed yet.

Mr. Owens replied that if issues are raised by the independent Hydrologist’s Report, same will be taken into account and dealt with as appropriate by the Council.

Cllrs. Broderick and D. Connolly asked if the funding approved by the Department of Housing, Planning, Community & Local Government (DHPCLG) for the project would be lost to the Council if the Part 8 proposal was not approved by the Council at today’s Meeting.

Mr. Owens replied that if the Part 8 is not approved by the Members, the Council will not be in a position to draw down the funding for the proposed construction of 10 houses at Garbally Drive and this funding will go back to the DHPCLG. He said it is unlikely that this funding would be re-allocated to Galway County Council in 2017 due to timeframes in relation to progressing an alternative proposal.

Cllr. Burke said that, notwithstanding the Reports of Tobin Consulting Engineers, he had concerns regarding flooding which occurs on a regular basis. He said he had concerns regarding the displacement that the proposed 10 no. houses would create on the site and he found it difficult to support the proposal.

The Cathaoirleach and Cllr. McClearn also expressed concerns regarding flooding on the site.

Cllr. D. Connolly referred to concerns which the Residents have expressed regarding traffic and ponding of water in the field to the north of the site of the proposed houses leading to concerns regarding child safety.

Mr. Owens replied to Members and acknowledged the concerns of the Residents and advised that he had addressed these concerns directly with the Residents. It was he noted with a view to alleviating these concerns, Tobin Consulting Engineers were asked to investigate further and the results of their investigations are detailed in the Report dated 22nd February 2017

In particular, he referred again to No. 2 of Tobin Consulting Engineers’ Report dated 22nd February 2017, which states that it is predicted that the pluvial flooding in the field to the north of the site does not impact the proposed development or any of the existing properties in Garbally Drive.

He referred to the Chief Executive’s Report dated January 2017, Recommendation No. 2 where it recommends that all surface water generated by the development shall be disposed of within the site and shall not be discharged onto the adjoining property and shall be in accordance with the drainage arrangements submitted.

He referred to Recommendation No. 5, where it recommends that a boundary treatment shall be devised for the site, full details to be agreed with the Planning Authority prior to commencement of the development.

He referred to Recommendation No. 7 of the Chief Executive’s Report where it recommends that a Traffic Management Plan shall be provided and agreed for the construction phase of the development prior to commencement of works on site.

Cllr. J. Byrne said that Tobin Consulting Engineers’ Report is quite clear that the development will not cause flooding and will not be detrimental to existing houses. He said the question is whether the Members agree or disagree with the Consultants’ findings.

Cllr. Noone said that while there may be concerns regarding flooding issues, Reports are available to the Members and he would not wish the Council to lose the opportunity to provide houses to meet an existing need.

Cllr. N. Byrne said she would be guided by the Reports available to the Members and that context, it would not be acceptable if funding allocated to the Council to build houses for those in need were to be returned to the Department.

Cllr. M. Finnerty asked if it would be possible to purchase 10 no. vacant houses in the Ballinasloe area and repair them and Mr. Owens replied that, in order to alleviate the housing crisis, the Council will explore all avenues open to it, including the option of purchasing houses and constructing new houses. He said he would deal with the Housing Strategy under Item 15 on the Agenda for today’s Meeting.

Cllr. M. Finnerty PROPOSED that the Report under Part 8 of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001, (as amended), for the construction of 10 No. 3-bedroomed, semi-detached Units in Garbally Drive, Ballinasloe, Co. Galway, be agreed. This proposal was SECONDED by Cllr. D. Connolly.

A number of Members indicated that they did not agree with the proposal and the Cathaoirleach called for a Vote on the proposal.

The result of the Vote was as follows:

For: Cllrs. Donohue, Mannion, G. Finnerty, J. Byrne, Fahy, Hynes, Walsh, Broderick, Comh. Ó Cualáin, Cllrs. B. Connelly, Kearney, Cuddy, K. McHugh, M. Finnerty, Feeney, Donnellan, Healy, Com. Ó Tuairisg, Cllrs. D. Connolly, [26] Cronnelly, McClearn, Noone, N. Byrne, Roche, Welby and T. McHugh.

Against: Cllrs. Killilea, Burke and M. Connolly. [3]

Abstain: Cllrs. Hoade, Thomas and Cunniffe [3]

The Cathaoirleach deemed the proposal CARRIED.

TO CONSIDER REPORT UNDER PART 8 OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 2001 (AS AMENDED) – FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF RURAL HOUSE 1, AT CILL CHIARÁIN, CONAMARA, CO. NA GAILLIMHE. 2952 [Chief Executive’s Report dated February 2017, available to the Members on the Extranet]

On the PROPOSAL of Comh. Ó Tuairisg, SECONDED by Cllr. Walsh, the proposed construction of a single rural house at Cill Chiaráin, Conamara, Co. na Gaillimhe, as outlined in the Report, was AGREED.

TO CONSIDER REPORT UNDER PART 8 OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 2001 (AS AMENDED) – FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF RURAL HOUSE 2, AT TOMNAHULLA, CORRANDULLA, CO. GALWAY. 2953 [Chief Executive’s Report dated February 2017, available to the Members on the Extranet]

On the PROPOSAL of Cllr. Hoade, SECONDED by Cllr. T. McHugh, the proposed construction of a single rural house at Tomnahulla, Corrandulla, Co. Galway, as outlined in the Report, was AGREED.

TO CONSIDER REPORT UNDER PART 8 OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 2001 (AS AMENDED) – FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF RURAL HOUSE 3, AT WATERDALE (EOCHAILL), CLAREGALWAY, CO. GALWAY. 2954 [Chief Executive’s Report dated February 2017, available to the Members on the Extranet]

On the PROPOSAL of Cllr. Noone, SECONDED by Cllr. Kearney, the proposed construction of a single rural house at Waterdale (Eochaill), Claregalway, Co. Galway, as outlined in the Report, was AGREED.

Cllr. Thomas, Comh. Ó Tuairisg and Ó Cualain asked if it is the policy of the Council to build single rural houses, stating that this would be welcome.

Mr. Owens said that all proposals for housing construction are subject to the approval of the DHPCLG and he said that the Department will consider single rural houses on an exceptional housing needs basis, i.e. medical grounds. He said that 6 no. single rural houses were approved for construction in the 2015-2017 Programme, including the 3 no. on the Agenda for today’s Meeting.

TO CONSIDER REPORT UNDER PART 8 OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 2001, (AS AMENDED) - GILMARTIN ROAD, TUAM, CO GALWAY, TO DEMOLISH 30 HOUSES AND BUILD 40 NEW HOUSES, CONSISTING OF 25 NO. 2 BEDROOM AND 15 NO. 3 BEDROOM HOUSES. 2955

(2 No. 3 bedroomed 2 Storey end Terrace, 1 No. 3 Bedroomed 2 Storey detached, 8 No. 3 Bedroomed 2 Storey Terrace, 21 No. 2 Bedroomed 2 Storey Terrace, 4 No. 3 Bedroomed Single Storey detached, 4 No. 2 Bedroomed Single Storey detached.

[Chief Executive’s Report dated 22nd February 2017, available to the Members on the Extranet]

Cllr. T. McHugh welcomed the proposed redevelopment works to be carried out at Gilmartin Road, Tuam, however he said it was regrettable that houses at Gilmartin Road which were refurbished less than 20 years previously were in need of repair after such a short period of time. He said he would request that the houses be completed and occupied on a phased basis and that a mix of tenants occupy the houses. He said that a submission had been made in respect of the Part 8 Planning Process, by the adjoining property owner who had concerns regarding the perimeter wall. He said he expected that the Council would address this issue to the satisfaction of the property owner so as to ensure that the adjoining properties be protected.

Mr. Owens replied that the phasing of the project would be considered, however this must be balanced as regards the cost implications of same. He said that the Part 8 Proposal is to demolish 30 houses and to build 40 new houses. However, he said the project at Gilmartin Road also includes the refurbishment of a further 20 houses which are not subject to the Part 8 Planning Process. He acknowledged the co-operation and engagement of the tenants of Gilmartin Road in relation to the project.

Cllr. K. McHugh welcomed the proposal and she raised some issues in this regard. Mr. Owens, in reply to Cllr. K. McHugh, said that efficient lighting will be a factor in the contract, he

10 referred her to Recommendation No. 14 of the Chief Executive’s Report which dealt with the issue of Japanese knotweed and he said that her query regarding the junction with the Galway Road falls outside the scope of the Part 8 Proposal and should be referred to the Roads & Transportation for consideration.

In reply to Cllr. Hoade, Mr. Owens said that it is envisaged that the contract for the project will be awarded in May/June 2017 with a completion period of 18 months.

Cllrs. Killilea, Cunniffe, Connelly and Hoade also supported the proposal, subject to the Council addressing the concerns of the adjoining property owner in relation to the perimeter wall and also subject to proper estate management being in place. Cllr. Cunniffe asked if the Members could amend the Part 8 Proposal in order to address the issue of the perimeter fence as per the submission from the adjoining property owner.

Cllr. Keaveney said that the re-development of Gilmartin Road will be a major boost for Tuam, but it must be managed correctly. He suggested that a mesh fence be placed on top of the boundary wall in order to prevent illegal dumping.

Mr. Owens replied to the Members stating that the Part 8 before the Members is only one element of the proposal and that the other important element is Estate Management. He said that previous experience will inform the Council’s approach in relation to developing policy that supports and sustains Estate Management. He said that a Policy on Estate Management will be considered by the Housing SPC and will be brought before the Plenary Council at a forthcoming Monthly Meeting.

He said that the Members could add to or amend Conditions included in the Part 8 proposal. In relation to the issue raised regarding the boundary fence, he referred the Members to Recommendation No. 10 of the Chief Executive’s Report which states that boundary treatment details of all public open space shall be agreed in writing with the Planning Authority prior to the commencement of development on the site.

Cllr. Killilea said that it is important that the concerns of the adjoining property owner are addressed and he asked if it would be feasible to put a mesh fence on top of the standard 1.8m wall to bring the combined height to 3m.

Mr. Owens replied that the impact of a 3m high fence on Residents, taking account of the size of the back gardens, must be taken into consideration and any change from the standard 1.8m height of a boundary wall would be discussed with the Planning Department and he suggested that discussions take place with the Planners before a decision is made in this regard.

Cllr. Keaveney made the following PROPOSAL “that a 1m mesh fence be erected on top of the proposed 1.8m wall. To be included in Section 10 of Part 8.” This proposal was SECONDED by Cllr. Killilea.

Mr. Owens acknowledged that, the concerns of the adjoining property owner in relation to illegal dumping were based on his experience to date. He said the standard height of 1.8m is considered for the boundary wall in the proposal at present but that the boundary wall is only one aspect as regards addressing concerns of illegal dumping and that CCTV and Estate Management will mitigate such problems as well moving back properties on the site and overall design of the area incorporating open space into the redevelopment providing for passive surveillance, making illegal dumping activity easy to detect. He stated that the Members may wish to consider an amendment to recommendation no. 10, that the boundary wall be to a minimum of 1.8m in height, and thereafter discussions could take place with the property owner and the Planning Section.

Cllr. T. McHugh expressed the view that this was a sensible amendment which the Members should adopt.

In reply to Cllr. Killilea, Mr. Owens said that this amendment would not prejudice the development but it would require that the design proposal be revisited. The Members did not all agree with this course of action and Cllr. Cunniffe said that the height of the wall must be addressed.

Cllr. Killilea asked if the Director of Services would meet with the property owner and Mr. Owens said he would welcome the opportunity to discuss the issue with the property owner.

Cllr. Keaveney then WITHDREW his proposal.

Cllr. T. McHugh made the following PROPOSAL “In regard to No. 10 Condition Part 8 Gilmartin Road - Boundary treatment details for the entire site to a minimum of 1.8m and taking into account particular boundary needs shall be agreed in writing with Planning Authority” Cllr. Hoade SECONDED this proposal.

It was PROPOSED by Cllr. T. McHugh, SECONDED by Cllr. Killilea, and AGREED, that the proposal to demolish 30 houses and build 40 new houses, consisting of 25 no. 2 bedroom and 15 no. 3 bedroom houses at Gilmartin Road, Tuam, Co. Galway, subject to the following addition to Recommendation No. 10 being included - Boundary treatment details for the entire site to a minimum of 1.8m and taking into account particular boundary needs shall be agreed in writing with Planning Authority.

TO CONSIDER AUDITED ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR GALWAY COUNTY COUNCIL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUDIT SERVICE STATUTORY AUDIT REPORT TO GALWAY COUNTY COUNCIL FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31ST 2015. 2956

[Reports entitled “Audited Annual Financial Statement for Galway County Council for Year Ended 31st December 2015” and “Local Government Audit Service Statutory Audit Report to the Members of Galway County Council for the Year Ended 31st December 2015” were available to the Members on the Extranet]

A discussion took place regarding the Audited Annual Financial Statement and the Audit Report.

Cllr. Killilea asked why income [in report on 2014] was reduced from the previous year and Mr. Mullarkey replied that additional grants had been received to deal with flooding issues the previous year. He noted that Irish Water contributions had reduced because provision for goods and services had transferred over to the Irish Water system from that of the Council and he also said that there were additional payments received in respect of the Non Principal Private Residence Charge (NPPR) in 2014.

In reply to Cllr. Cuddy, the Chief Executive said that the remaining balance of €0.8m in respect of Cill Rónain and Caladh Mór Harbours is an unfunded balance. He said that a funding stream to account for this balance will have to be identified in the coming period.

Cllrs. D. Connolly and Killilea raised the issue of staffing and asked why staff are not being recruited by the Council.

The Chief Executive replied that the Council is required to shoulder the burden of payroll in the main and while the Council has been in a position to sustain staffing levels currently, consideration must be given to likely income going forward and he said the question of increasing staffing levels will be limited until finances improve into the future.

In reply to Cllrs. Welby and Donohue, the Chief Executive said that if legislation is amended to allow Local Authorities to put interim valuations in place, this would be very beneficial to the Council in terms of revenue from rates.

Cllr. Charity referred to shared services between Galway County and City Councils and said that any payments due to the County Council from the City Council should be calculated and recouped without delay.

The Chief Executive replied that the City Council makes substantial payments each year to Galway County Council in respect of shared services such as the fire service, libraries etc. He said that the City Council has paid the full agreed amount in respect of 2016. He said that the method of agreeing shared service recoupment was based historically on the product of a penny in the pound and this is no longer calculable. However, he said that discussions are taking place between the Local Authorities regarding the methodology of calculating legacy amounts and it is intended that this will be agreed in the coming weeks.

On the PROPOSAL of Cllr. Maher, SECONDED by Cllr. Donnellan, the Audited Annual Financial Statement for Galway County Council and the Local Government Audit Service Statutory Audit Report to Galway County Council for year ended December 31st 2015, were ADOPTED by the Members.

On the PROPOSAL of Cllr. M. Finnerty, SECONDED by Cllr. Maher, the Audit Committee’s Report to Council on its consideration of the Audited Financial Statement and Auditors Report 2015 in accordance with Section 121 of the Local Government Act 2001 (as amended), was ADOPTED by the Members.

TO CONSIDER THE COUNTY GALWAY JOINT POLICING COMMITTEE (JPC) ANNUAL REPORT 2016 2957 [JPC Annual Report 2016 available to the Members on the Extranet]

Mr. Owens said that the County Galway Joint Policing Committee Annual Report 2016 was considered and approved by the JPC. On the PROPOSAL of Cllr. Killilea, SECONDED by Cllr. Healy, the Joint Policing Committee Annual Report 2016 was APPROVED.

TO CONSIDER AND IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE ADOPT THE GALWAY COUNTY COUNCIL SERVICE DELIVERY PLAN 2017 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 134(A) OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 2001 (AS AMENDED) 2958

[Galway County Council Annual Service Delivery Plan 2017 available to the Members on the Extranet]

The Chief Executive presented the Service Delivery Plan to the Members stating that it is a requirement under legislation that the local authority prepare a plan identifying the services it intends to provide to the public, consistent with the provisions of the local authority budget.

Cllr. Healy referred to the Service Delivery Plan 2017 and noted that there was no matrix for measuring targets achieved and he expressed the view that this should be included.

On the PROPOSAL of Cllr. Killilea, SECONDED by Cllr. B. Connelly it was AGREED to adopt the Galway County Council Service Delivery Plan 2017 as circulated.

SUSPENSION OF STANDING ORDERS 2959

It was agreed that the Standing Orders be suspended in order to allow the Meeting continue after 5.00 p.m.

TO CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A GALWAY COUNTY COUNCIL FINANCE COMMITTEE 2960 [Report entitled Galway County Council Finance Committee available to the Members on the Extranet] 14

The Chief Executive said that further to the proposal agreed by the Members at the December 2016 Monthly Meeting of the Council that the Council establish a Finance Committee, the setting up of a Finance Committee was discussed at the Meeting of the Corporate Policy Group (CPG) on 20th February, 2017.

He said that it was agreed by the CPG that the Finance Committee be established on a non- statutory basis with the primary objective of addressing the issue of the overall funding of the Council with a view to increasing the amount of funding available.

The Chief Executive said that it is intended that the Finance Committee would have an overall perspective in relation to financial matters and it would be a matter for the Committee to decide the frequency of reporting to full Council.

Cllrs. Welby, Healy, McClearn, Hoade and Cuddy, welcomed the setting up of the Finance Committee.

Cllr. Hoade PROPOSED that in addition to the 10 Members on the Committee, the Cathaoirleach also sit on the Committee.

This proposal was SECONDED by Cllr. Killilea, and AGREED.

The Cathaoirleach asked for nominations to the Finance Committee.

It was PROPOSED by Cllr. Cuddy and SECONDED by Comh. Ó Cualáin that the following Members be nominated:

Cllrs. T. Welby, G. Broderick and S. Cunniffe.

It was PROPOSED by Cllr. Hoade and SECONDED by Cllr. Killilea that the following Members be nominated:

Cllr. M. Kinane, Comh. S. Ó Tuairisg, Cllr. M. Hoade

It was PROPOSED by Cllr. Walsh and SECONDED by Cllr. D. Connolly that the following Member be nominated:

Cllr. T. Healy

It was PROPOSED by Cllr. McClearn and SECONDED by Cllr. T. McHugh that the following Members be nominated:

Cllrs. J. Byrne, P. Roche and J. McClearn.

As there were no further nominations, it was AGREED that the following 10 no. Members, and the Cathaoirleach, be elected onto the Finance Committee:

Cllrs. T. Welby, G. Broderick, S. Cunniffe, M. Kinane, Comh. S. Ó Tuairisg, Cllrs. M. Hoade, T. Healy, J. Byrne, P. Roche, J. McClearn and Cathaoirleach M. Connolly.

Cllr. McClearn asked what support would be provided to the Committee and when the Committee would meet.

Cllr. Welby stated it would be important that there be a channel back to the CPG from the Finance Committee.

The Chief Executive replied that the Council did not have the resources for a dedicated secretariat for the Committee, he confirmed the Chief Executive would be attending and the Directors of Services would attend the first meeting.

Cllr. Welby proposed that the Members of the Finance Committee meet directly after the Plenary Meeting to agree a date.

TO CONSIDER THE MANAGEMENT REPORT – FEBRUARY 2017 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 136(2) OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 2001 (AS AMENDED) 2961 [Report dated 27th February, 2017 available for the Members on the Extranet]

Comh. Ó Cualáin welcomed the 2017 Anti-Dumping Initiative of the Department of Communication, Climate Action & Environment aimed at assisting Local Authorities to deal with illegal dumping. He said that the initial Countywide allocation of €650,000 is low but will be of help. He said that it is important that people engaged in illegal dumping be prosecuted and that fines imposed be followed up to ensure fines are paid.

In reply to the Cathaoirleach and Cllr. Cunniffe, Mr. Cullen said that applications for funding under the initiative will be co-ordinated by the Environment Section and he invited the Members to notify the Environment Section of particular black spots of illegal dumping in this regard, bearing in mind that the allocation will not allow the Council to deal with all black spots. He said that the Environment Section will work with An Garda Síochána, the Department of Social Protection and the Probation Service in order to put covert CCTV in place as appropriate. He said that if the initiative is successful, it is likely that the Department will provide a second tranche of funding at a later stage.

Cllr. D. Connolly referred to the new maximum rent of €130 per week to apply to tenants of Local Authority houses, including tenants of the former Ballinasloe Town Council, from 11th March 2017. He expressed his thanks to the Housing Staff who met with tenants in

Ballinasloe to listen to concerns directly and noted that tenants of the former Ballinasloe Town Council are finding it particularly difficult to meet higher rent demands.

In reply to the Cathaoirleach, Mr. Owens said that the Council will continue to facilitate one- to-one discussions with tenants in difficulty as regards paying their rent. He said that the Council has put in place transitional arrangements for households with a net weekly income below €260, with 50% of any increase applied as and from 11th March 2017 and the remaining 50% deferred for a period of 6 months. He also said that those in receipt of the Old Aged Pension will benefit from a reduction in their weekly rent, due to a rent cap at €25 per week, plus €2 in respect of LPT Charge.

TO RECEIVE A PRESENTATION ON IRELAND 2040 OUR PLAN - NATIONAL PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2962 [Report dated February 2017 available on the Extranet]

The Cathaoirleach invited the presentation on Ireland 2040 Our Plan – National Planning Framework.

Ms. McConnell advised the meeting that ‘Ireland 2040 – Our Plan National Planning Framework’ which was circulated to the Members is an opportunity for the members to outline what they would like to see considered for Galway as a region and as a driver for the wider regional economy. She said that this was the very initial stage of the consultation and the Executive is seeking the Elected Members’ views on what they would like to see incorporated into Galway County Council’s submission on this National Planning Framework.

Ms. Loughnane made a presentation to the meeting on ‘Ireland 2040 – Our Plan National Planning Framework’.

Ms. Loughnane advised that Ireland 2040 National Planning Framework (NPF) will be the successor to the National Spatial Strategy 2002 (NSS). She said that the NPF would have a statutory backing in planning legislation and is a high level, strategic document and will be the basis for planning and investment.

Ms. Loughnane advised that the National Spatial Strategy was the first ‘National’ Spatial Plan for Ireland and it identified nine ‘Gateways’ and nine ‘Hubs’ to focus growth which included Galway City as a Gateway and Tuam as a Hub town.

Ms. Loughnane stated to the Meeting that the outcomes of the National Spatial Strategy 2002-2016 identified that Gateways and Hubs grew at less than National Average 17% as opposed to 21.5% and only 33% of national population growth occurred in Gateway and Hub settlements i.e. 67% happened elsewhere. She advised that the actual growth of 22 non- Dublin Gateway and Hubs was matched by growth in 22 completely different settlements and the 22 fastest growing settlements average 2002 population (6,000) was five times less than average Gateway & Hub population. Galway City and environs population grew, Sligo as a designated gateway lost population.

Ms. Loughnane advised the Meeting that the NSS did not have statutory backing and some lessons to be learned from the NSS is that influencing the spatial pattern of Ireland over the next 20 years requires an evidence base and strong leadership and political support and the perceived concept of ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ must be avoided. She advised that integration is vital to its success and all government departments and agencies must co-ordinate their policies and priorities and there will be a need to align investment and policy decision.

Ms. Loughnane advised the Meeting that a National Framework Policy is needed as an up to date National strategy at the top of the planning hierarchy is essential to ensure sustainable development. She said that the NFP lists all the differing patterns; growing, ageing, dispersed population, households, changing patterns of employment, climate change targets, decarburization by 2050 and it is predicted that over the next 20 years the population will rise to 5.5m which will bring its associated stats with that. She said that alignment of investment priorities with settlement, employment and environmental strategies is required and legislative changes will be required to put the National Planning Framework on a statutory footing.

Ms. Loughnane advised that National Planning Framework produced an issues paper which listed 10 key questions to stimulate debate as to what way one could make an input into this planning process.

In response to queries Ms Loughnane explained with regard to Ports & Harbours that the Council’s submission will make a case for the further development of Ross a Mhíl harbour and will work with Údarás to promote same and encourage investment. With regard to tourism, she said while the number of visitors is high, the West region is not performing as well as the east of the country.

Ms. Loughnane advised that the Northern and Western Regional Assembly Region is comprised of 8 counties representing 36.2% of the landmass of the Republic of Ireland. She advised that the West region is competing on all fronts with the Eastern and Midland Region and the Southern Region.

Ms. Loughnane said that the Council should focus on a very high level and strategic objective and focus on what the county is doing well. She said that it is vital that the region demonstrates that it is critical to underpinning the future socio-cultural development of the country and the region needs to use its current advantages in environmental and socio- cultural terms and focus on advanced technologies rather than just on what is now considered core infrastructure such as motorways, water and broadband.

Ms. Loughnane advised that submissions at this first stage of the National Planning Framework process could be made between 9am on Thursday 2nd February 2017 and 12 noon on Thursday 16th March 2017. She advised that the Members comments would be incorporated into the Council’s submission and this would be included in the Regional submission. She explained that each elected member could also make their own individual submission by email or post to NPF submissions.

Ms. Loughnane concluded by saying that the Council should think strategically and in her opinion there would be greater impact if the submissions was aligned with the regional submission.

Cllr. Welby said to the Meeting that he felt that the NPF would be very successful. He said that the AILG has provided training to Councillors. He said that the Local Authority and its members need to engage with Irish Water to ensure Galway has adequate infrastructure. He explained that the Department had requested good examples and one such example would be Connemara West where a small community has created something exceptional with educational tourism in Letterfrack. He said that alternative income streams needs to be considered and examined for Connemara and this was a great example. He also stated that the Greenway has the potential to sustain a longer tourist season. He said that examination of urban and rural housing would need to be considered.

Cllr. McClearn said that the NPF brings some great challenges and that Galway is seen as being the driving force for the whole region and asked if specific towns could be identified for growth/industry. He said that there is a need to identify the lack of infrastructure in the North and Western Region. He said that adequate infrastructure will be required if there is to be any hope to attract industry and people to live in the region. He said that the Atlantic Corridor will need motorway and rail connectivity from Cork to Letterkenny and broadband and wastewater facilities are required. He said that a technical university is also needed. He said bold decisions need to be taken and no apologies for seeking what we need.

Cllr. Byrne said that the presentation gave a very good overview of the vision of our rural villages and areas in 20 years’ time. He said that one-off rural housing is an issue. He expressed concern that the investment in rural schools will be redundant as there will not be enough people living in the rural area. He asked how the Galway submission will address the issue of local people not getting permission to live in their rural area and how communities can be kept vibrant.

Cllr. Feeney said this was a very important opportunity and referred to how unsuccessful the previous NSS was. He highlighted the need for a counterbalance to the Eastern region and queried whether liaison should happen with the Southern region to realise the Atlantic Corridor model. He queried how our small towns can be included into the framework so it can be ensured that they are not left behind. He said that economic initiatives are the way forward (i.e. low development charges, property tax, relaxed approach to town centres). He said that BREXIT is a huge threat especially for the rural sector and that building a rural sectoral plan where agriculture is a big sector is a challenge. He said while Galway City is choking that this was not a reason to ignore the City region and what it needs to grow and thrive. He concurred with the importance of the economic corridor between Galway and Athenry and said that it was the confluence of National Strategic Infrastructure and can be the engine for the region. He said that Galway’s natural hinterland is to the north – that where we should look for partners.

Cllr. O’Tuairisg said that the rural areas will be the losers in this framework. He said that Connemara has European designations and cannot even get a decent road. Depopulation is increasing and the schools area losing pupils which could lead to them being closed down. He

19 expressed concern re planning for rural houses and the NPF needs to address the problems of the rural area if it is to be successful.

Cllr. D. Connolly said that this presentation was similar to the one given by the Northern Western Regional Assembly (NWRA). He expressed concern that Galway County has the poorest roads spend since 1975 and this imbalance needs to be addressed between the North West and the other regions. He said that investment is needed in Roads and Transportation and Water Services.

Cllr. D. Connolly referred to agriculture in the region and said that holdings are becoming larger and there is no prospect for smaller holdings and said that small holdings need to be kept viable. Cllr. D. Connolly said that markets need to be found for quality produce and high standards of food production in clean environment need to be identified as a unique strength in agriculture.

Cllr. D. Connolly said that towns such as Ballinasloe has the potential to develop as an alternative to the larger cities. He said that the Brexit bounce that is expected in the east should be counterbalanced if possible by re-focussing investment in necessary infrastructure, especially Broadband infrastructure. He also referred to the potential of the marine sector.

Cllr. Donohue advised the Meeting that the maps included the presentation show the whole picture re infrastructure deficit through the North West. He said that investment in proper infrastructure is critical for industry and education if the area is to be attractive.

Comh. O’ Cualain said that tourists need to be attracted to our area as the County/region is not getting our fair share and it could be due to the lack of infrastructure. He said that investment in road and rail and broadband is critical. He said that the major centres along the west coast are not linked by motorway or rail and this is a major impediment to development along the west coast. He said that population decline will continue in rural areas due to lack of employment or decent access to job opportunities.

Cllr. Thomas expressed his doubts about the success of the Strategy. He said that the Council should encourage population close to opportunities for employment without a Housing Need restriction while at the same time address the population decline in other areas. These two strategic aims are in direct contradiction and he queried how the NPF could address same.

He said that the ocean resources are a huge opportunity but these are being threatened by National policy on access to fishing rights and the Council should be encouraging co-ops for small production of Seaweed, etc to support coastal communities. He said that infrastructure to service the populated areas along our coasts is vital to maintain the populations.

Cllr. Healy advised the meeting that a test to this Strategy will be whether Galway continues to lose our populations. He also referred to the environmental designations and their impacts which have serious implications on the County’s ability to thrive and expand/sustain ourselves and our population. He referred to the economic corridor along the West Coast and if the benefits of this corridor will be felt in our more rural areas. He said that we need to increase our population in our

20 towns and villages. He expressed concern over the strong emphasis on Tourism in Connemara and said there should be more opportunities pursued in the rural areas / Connemara to build economic diversity. He explained that service tech, software development, fine -tech industries all hold opportunities for the rural areas.

Cllr. Cuddy expressed concern about the NPF and the IDA’s policy on location of industries is focussed on East Coast. He said that educational facilities, motorways, waste water treatment is all available but are not exploited. He said Galway is in prime proximity to Shannon and Knock.

Cllr. Cuddy referred to the restrictive policy on rural housing and said it is affecting the attractiveness of the area to residents. He also said that the VAT on building costs is a big factor. He referred to the development contributions payable on private estates and what they are used for. He also said that the Council needs to be pro- business in Rural Ireland in order to make it easy for organisations to choose outside the large urban areas.

Cllr. Donnellan said this is the time for the Council collectively to put ideas forward which should not be exclusively parochial and solely about Infrastructure, Broadband. He said that greenways provide opportunities to connect East to West and along the west, both from a tourism and connectedness viewpoint. He said that the Knock airport strategic alliance needs to be exploited to bring tourism and business to the west.

Cllr. Hoade said that our County is very diverse. She said that housing is a big challenge. Small towns and villages need investment in infrastructure and in their social attractiveness as places to live and work. She said that proximity to Airports needs to be exploited to channel tourists to the West.

Cllr. Burke referred to one-off houses and said that villages are being decimated in favour of rural areas in the east of the County. He said that focus should be put on the potential of our towns and villages as attractive alternatives. He said he does not want to see rural suburbia following Galway 2040.

Cllr. Cunniffe advised the Meeting that a different type of investment is needed in our Region and we should not just seek to have what the East has. He said that the National Investment Plan makes it clear that Rail along the west is not viable. He said that normal jobs that might re-generate rural Ireland are not being championed and these jobs do not fall within the remits of EI and IDA. He asked if a separate entity could be had to support small local jobs that will sustain the rural towns and villages.

He explained that tourism is our greatest potential for development and activity holidays are not being developed in Ireland.

Cllr. Charity said that a 20 year plan that, has at its core, the redress of the imbalance between the Dublin regions and the rest of the regions should be welcomed. He said that contradictions between objectives to balance population growth and more employment opportunities and to support rural areas need to be examined. He said there was a need for orchestrated amendments in the urban centres to counterbalance the East coast/Dublin and

21 this needs to be radical. He said that the actions of the Government seem to be at variance to what is being advocated in the NDP documentations, for example, investment in new aviation routes is everywhere but in the west.

Cllr. Kearney said that the North West region of Ireland could get very lost. He said that it was critical that we fight hard for our Atlantic Corridor. He said that rail, road and broadband services are required. He said that more gas spurs would help support industry in smaller settlements or outside of large cities. He said how Parkmore is an example of how policies have failed in the past. He also said that re-locating industry to other locations could benefit.

Cllr. Maher welcomed the presentation and Plan. He said that waste water facilities are critical to the development of our towns and villages. He said that the Council should demand that Irish Water prioritise these settlements.

TO RECEIVE A PRESENTATION / UPDATE ON HOUSING SERVICES 2963

Mr. Owens made a presentation to the Members in relation to Housing Services.

Following the presentation, the Cathaoirleach and Members welcomed the significant progress being made in addressing various issues, acknowledging the work of the A/Director of Services and the staff in the Housing unit in this regard.

Cllr. D. Connolly welcomed the introduction of Choice Based Letting on a pilot basis. Mr. Owens said that this initiative is intended to assist in the allocation of hard-to-let dwellings however he said Galway County Council does not have many such dwellings. He said it is not the intention of the Council to operate the Choice Based Letting scheme for its full housing stock. In relation to the homeless issue, Cllr. D. Connolly expressed the view that services should be provided more locally in this regard. Mr. Owens replied that the Council is engaging with Cope and Galway Simon in relation to the homeless and has made 2 no. houses available to Galway Simon to assist families to transition to independent living. He said it is the intention to assist those availing of hotels and other emergency accommodation to transition to other forms of independent living and he said that proposals to extend the number of transitional houses will be brought to the Housing SPC for consideration in the short-term.

In reply to Cllrs. Donohue, Thomas and D. Connolly regarding the Repair & Leasing Scheme, Mr. Owens said that this Scheme is intended to apply to properties which require repairs to bring the property up to standard for letting, subject to certain requirements. It is intended that the Council or Approved Housing Body will pay for the repair work up-front in return for the property being made available for social housing through a lease for a period of at least 10 years. He said that there is no indication at present if funding for the Scheme will be provided directly to each Local Authority or if funds will be drawn down from a central fund.

He said that further detail of the Scheme is awaited from the DHPCLG, however he said it is envisaged that payments would be issued by the Council to the property owner with an amount discounted to cover the cost of bringing the property up to standard. Cllrs. Killilea and Thomas said it was surprising that 74% of those on the housing waiting list had expressed a preference for 1 – 2 bedroomed units. Mr. Owens replied that the bed- profile had changed over a period and that County Galway is not unique in this regard. He said that traditionally the Council built 3 – 4 bedroomed units, but it is apparent that this profile of build needs to be amended going forward. Also in reply to Cllr. Killilea, Mr. Owens said that the number of 2613 on the waiting list did not include those on the Housing Assistance Payments Scheme (HAP) or the Rental Assistance Scheme (RAS) as their accommodation need is determined to have been met when in receipt of these payments. In reply to Cllr. Maher, Mr. Owens said that the Housing Section intends to be proactive in making information available, through various means, to the public and the elected Members in the interests of efficiency. Also in reply to Cllr. Maher, Mr. Owens said that the Council intends to commence construction of the Group Housing Scheme at the site of Craughwell Halting Site by the end of the year. In reply to Cllr. Hoade, Mr. Owens said that 142 households on the housing waiting list have expressed a preference for housing in the Headford area. Comh. Ó Cualáin asked if the Council is well prepared should the Department of Housing, Planning, Community & Local Government (DHPCLG) allocate additional funding for housing and Mr. Owens informed the Members that the Council had submitted a number of proposals to the DHPCLG for consideration over and above those included in his Presentation. He said that the Council’s current Social Housing Strategy covers the period to the end of 2017 and preparations for the next strategy, which will be in place for 2018, will commence in the second half of 2017. Cllrs. Hoade, Maher and D. Connolly expressed the view that vacant houses/voids should be repaired and made available for re-letting without delay and Mr. Owens replied that the vacant houses are to be inspected with a view to carrying out repairs as necessary through direct labour or by contract and to make these houses available for letting as soon as possible. Cllr. M. Connolly said that there is reduced funding available for housing adaptation for those with disabilities if the house is less than one year constructed and he felt that should not be the case. Mr. Owens said that contact can be made with the DHPCLG in relation to the one- year requirement, and he said that adaptations must be in accordance with Part M of the Building Regulations 2010. In reply to Cllr. Killilea in relation to the Disability Strategy, Mr. Owens said that the aim of the Strategy is to provide independent living accommodation for people with special housing needs under the Capital Assistance Scheme and he said that the DHPCLG determines the funding allocation in this regard.

Cllr. D. Connolly said that the Housing Staff of the Council provide a very good service to the public, however he asked if the increase in funding being provided to the Council includes an amount for increased staff numbers. Mr. Owens replied that funding for additional staff has been provided under the Capital Programme and additional staff had been put in place in the Housing Section as a result. In reply to Cllrs. Cuddy and Charity, Mr. Owens said it was his understanding that the provision of a temporary halting site on lands in the ownership of Galway City Council in Carrowmoneash, Oranmore has been proposed due to identified need as part of the City Council’s Traveller Accommodation Programme. He confirmed that any such project would be subject to the relevant statutory processes. Also in reply to Cllr. Cuddy, he confirmed that the site of the former Galway Airport at Carnmore, which is co-owned by Galway County and Galway City Councils, is not being considered for traveller accommodation. Cllr. Healy asked what progress was being made in relation to housing at Letterfrack, and Mr. Owens replied that 1st stage approval had been received in respect of Phase 2 of the Clúid Approved Housing Body scheme at Letterfrack. He said that the Council would nominate the tenants for the houses from the Housing Waiting List when the houses were ready for letting. He also said that the Housing Section would work towards a more co-ordinated approach to engaging with Approved Housing Bodies in 2017.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S BUSINESS & CORRESPONDENCE 2964

The following items of correspondence which were circulated at the meeting were noted:

 Correspondence dated 6th March 2017 from South Dublin County Council pass the motion that this Council, conscious as it is of the increasing gap in incomes in Ireland and across the EU, debate the case for a Basic Income as a means of addressing social and economic inequality and the inadequacy of both Social Welfare and Taxation Law in tackling either. That this Basic Income should be funded by progressive taxation and should not replace any existing Social Welfare payments. If there is consensus, that we write to the Taoiseach and Minister for Finance asking them to enter into discussion with their EU partners with the objective of making Ireland a Pilot Country to explore moving from the current Social Welfare and Taxation Systems to a Basic Income System.  Correspondence dated 2nd March 2017 from the Office of the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine, acknowledging the motion passed by Galway County Council on behalf of tillage growers in the West of Ireland and details on current position.  Correspondence dated 10th March 2017 from the Department of Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government inviting submissions in the preparation of a National Planning Framework for Ireland - Ireland 2040 – Our Plan

CATHAOIRLEACH’S BUSINESS 2965

Cllr. N. Byrne made a proposal that Galway County Council support the Irish Natura and Hill Farmers Association (INHFA) campaign to increase Areas of Natural Constraints payments to farmers in mountain areas. She asked for the Members support for this proposal and acknowledged that farmers in lowland areas were receiving less than farmers with land in mountainous areas. Comh. Ó Cualáin and Cllrs. Healy and Mannion expressed their support for the proposal. Cllr. Feeney expressed his support for the proposal on condition that it would not result in a reduction in the level of grant being paid to lowland farmers. After further discussion, it was agreed that an amended proposal in this regard be brought forward to the next Monthly Meeting of the Plenary Council. NOTICES OF MOTION

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 18 – CLLR. T. WELBY 2966

Cllr. Welby referred to his Notice of Motion No. 18 on the Agenda and made the following PROPOSAL: that “Galway County Council requests the Government to progress the Coroners Bill as a matter of urgency, and that the Coroner’s Bill will provide for an automatic Inquest into every Maternal Death in this State”. This proposal was SECONDED by Cllr. Cuddy, and AGREED.

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 19 – COMH. S. Ó TUAIRISG 2967

Comh Ó Tuairisg referred to his Notice of Motion No. 19 on the Agenda and PROPOSED as follows “Molaim; Ós rud é go bhfuil an bealach don bhóthar bhealach nua an Tionscadal Iompair N6 Chathair na Gaillimhe socraithe anois, iarraim go bhfaighfi réidh le formhór na mbealaigh feidireachta don bhóthar nua R336 Gaillimh go Scríob.

Tá na bealaí seo ag cur as go mór do iarratais pleanála i ndeisceart Chonamara agus daoine óga ag fanacht suas le 10 mbliana chun gur féidir leo iarratais a dhéanamh”. This proposal was SECONDED by Cllr. Walsh.

Seo leanas an freagra “Is mian liom a chur in iúl go ndéanfaidh Comhairle Chontae na Gaillimhe athscrúdú ar Tionscnamh R336 ó thaobh na bealach conairí a laghdú.”

Comh. Ó Tuairisg said that as the route for the Galway City Ring Road has been selected, he would like to see the planning restrictions on some of the proposed routes for the upgrade of R336 lifted, as these restrictions prohibit local people from receiving planning permission to build along these routes. 25

The Chief Executive said that the Variation of the County Development Plan in relation to the Galway City Ring Road would be put before the Members for consideration at an early Meeting of the Council.

A discussion took place regarding Comh. Ó Tuairisg’s proposal and the Chief Executive replied to the Members stating that it is not possible to reduce the identified routes without agreeing on a preferred route for the R336.

Following further debate, it was agreed that this matter be brought before the next Meeting of the Conamara Municipal District Council for discussion.

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 20 – CLLR. T. HEALY 2968

It was agreed that this Motion be deferred for consideration at the next Meeting of the Council.

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 21 – CLLR. M. FAHY 2969

Cllr. Fahy referred to his Notice of Motion No. 21 on the Agenda and PROPOSED “that Galway County Council make a submission to the Department of the Environment – that if Water Charges are abolished, that a Special Grant to Group Water Scheme Members and to people who have a private water supply with a water pump in their own property – to ensure equality is given to all people.” This proposal was SECONDED by the Cathaoirleach, and AGREED.

Comh. Ó Cualáin expressed his support of the Motion stating that if water is supplied free of charge, it should be free for everybody, including those on Group Water Supply Schemes and those who have a water pump installed on their property.

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 22 – CLLR. T. WELBY 2970

The following reply was given:-

“The number of houses built is not available but I wish to inform you that 21 planning permissions were granted for construction of dwellinghouses with in that period”

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 24 – COMH. S. Ó TUAIRISG 2971

“Is mian liom a chur in iúl go ndéanfaidh Comhairle Chontae na Gaillimhe athscrúdú ar Tionscnamh R336 ó thaobh na bealach conairí a laghdú.”

Seo leanas an freagra

“Is mian liom a chur in iúl go ndéanfaidh Comhairle Chontae na Gaillimhe meastóireacht ar an staid ag an suíomh seo, chun fáil amach an bhféadfar theacht ar réiteach”.

CHRIOCHNAIGH AN CRUINNIÚ ANSIN