OJ Simpson Case Study Compilation SUPA Forensics Period 8 O.J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OJ Simpson Case Study Compilation SUPA Forensics Period 8 O.J OJ Simpson Case Study Compilation SUPA Forensics Period 8 O.J. Simpson Case: Background Sara Starr, Michelle Hao, Mariam Momjian, Rebecca Song, Tristan Jeong Who was O.J. Simpson? • Born on July 9th, 1947 • He was raised by his mother, along with three siblings • Joined a street gang called the Persian Warriors at age 13 • Was a very successful college football player for USC o he won the Heisman Trophy • Went on to play football (as a running back) in the NFL until 1979 o he played for the Buffalo Bills o only became successful after the Bills changed their style of offense to showcase his talent • Changed career paths and went into acting and commentating (was fairly successful) The Personal Life of O.J. Simpson • O.J. married Marguerite L. Whitley in 1967 • O.J. had three children with Marguerite o their daughter Aaren Lashone died just before her birthday at age 2 (1979) • O.J. and Marguerite got a divorce in 1979 • Before he got a divorce, O.J. met Nicole Brown, who was 17 years old • In 1985 O.J. and Nicole were married o together they had two children • In 1992, Nicole filed for divorce o Nicole had often complained that O.J. was abusive towards her (which O.J. always denied) When, where, what? • Murder occurred on June 12th, 1994 • Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman were found dead outside Nicole Brown’s luxury condominium • 875 Bundy Drive • (Supposedly) OJ Simpson brutally stabbed Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman to death • Ronald Goldman was there just to drop off Nicole Brown’s sunglasses • He was in the wrong place at the wrong time Victims Nicole Brown • She was born in Frankfurt, Germany in 1959; moved with her family to Southern California as a toddler • She was working as a waitress when she met O.J. Simpson in 1977; she was 18 • She began dating Simpson, who was still married though he divorced his wife in 1979 • In 1977 Nicole Brown married O.J. Simpson • Had two kids with Simpson; Sydney and Justin • Nicole Brown was a devoted mother, as well as the owner of a small interior decorating business • O.J. was arrested for beating her (after a long history of bruises on her body), and they got divorced in 1992 Ronald Goldman • born and raised in Buffalo Grove, Illinois • moved to Southern California at age 18 • extremely athletic; enjoyed fitness clubs and surfing • was not in a relationship with Nicole Simpson Brown, was merely returning sunglasses she had left at the restaurant where he was a waiter Suspects OJ Simpson • Evidence found and collected at the scene led investigators to believe OJ was guilty • 6:20pm a chase began when OJ was seen being driven in his white Bronco, by his friend, and holding a gun to his head. A captured conversation revealed Simpson repeatedly saying that he was “the only one who deserved to get hurt”- his actions were interpreted as an admission of guilt. • The chase ended at 8:00 pm at his home in Brentwood, and Simpson was granted an hour to speak to his mother. • The authorities arrived, and upon Simpson’s surrender, they discovered $8000 in cash, clothing, a loaded .357 Magnum, passport, fake goatee, mustache, and family pictures in his Bronco. By race: 9 blacks, 1 hispanic, 2 whites By sex: 10 women, 2 men By education: 2 college graduates, 9 high school graduates, 1 without diploma 5/12 thought it appropriate to use force on a family member 5/12 reported that they had a negative experience with the police 9/12 thought that Simpson was less likely to become a murderer because he was an athlete 12/12 were Democrats The jury was mostly black people because the case was filed in LA rather than Santa Monica. A poll showed that most blacks found Simpson innocent while most whites found Simpson guilty. Jury When the trial initially began, on September 8 2008 in the court of Nevada Court, the judge was Jackie Glass Simpson testified asking the judge for retrial, but he was denied by Judge Linda Marie Bell Judge Prosecutors Marcia Clark, lead attorney in the case, Special Trials Division. Christopher Darden, co-counsel. Darden had completed a six-and-a-half year assignment with the Special Investigations Division before joining the prosecution team. Gil Garcetti, Los Angeles District Attorney, elected in 1992.. Hank Goldberg, joined the District Attorney's Office in 1985. William Hodgman, director of the Bureau of Central Operations, which includes the Special Trials Division. Lisa Kahn, DNA coordinator for the district attorney's office. Cheri Lewis, assisted in the research and preparation of prosecution motions and pleadings. Defense Attorneys (“The Dream Team”) - His criminal case cost at least $3 million, possibly as much as $6 million. F. Lee Bailey - celebrity attorney Johnnie Cochran Jr Alan Dershowitz Carl Douglas Robert Kardashian Peter Neufeld - specialized in DNA evidence Barry Scheck - specialized in DNA evidence Robert Shapiro Gerald Uelmen The Crime By: Rebecca Weimer, Brenna Wiegand, Kalette deMarrais and Noelle Lawler Type of Murder • Murder weapon- knife • O.J. Simpsons ex-wife and her friend were found murdered outside of Nicole Brown Simpons home. The Crime • Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald L. Goldman were murdered Charges • O.J. Simpson was charged with two counts of first degree murder • First degree murder means that he planned to kill his ex-wife and her friend • He was eligible for death penalty Suspect • OJ Simpson Victims • Nicole Brown Simpson • Ronald Goldman In court: • Judge Lance Ito- Judge • Mark Fuhrman- Detective of the LAPD • Supposedly planted the famous bloody glove Witnesses • Kato Kaelin • Was currently staying in a guest house on Simpsons property • He was present on the night of the two murders • Rosa Lopez • Former maid to Simpsons neighbor • Said when she was walking the dog and saw his white bronco parked outside his house Defense • Johnnie Cochran • Robert Shapiro • F. Lee Bailey • Robert Kardashian Prosecution • Marcia Cross The Car Chase • O.J. was in passenger seat while Al Cowlings drove • On Interstate 405 in LA in White Ford Bronco • Hour long chase • O.J. held a gun to his head and laid in the back seat- 50 miles total • Detective Lange was talking to O.J. to convince him to throw the gun out of the car Return to house • O.J. wanted to speak to his mom before he surrendered • He was allowed to go into his house for an hour • Lawyer Robert Shapiro arrived • Simpson surrendered Search of house: • After Simpson surrendered police searched the bronco and found: • $8,000 cash • Change of clothes • Loaded gun • Passport • Family pictures • Fake goatee and Mustache ** None of this was used in court as evidence** Crime Scene Evidence Michael Leon, Max Cepeda, Dan Desiderio, Kat Hroncic Evidence from the Crime • XL Aris Gloves • Size 12 Bruno Magli Shoes • The Bronco car • Strange reaction to call about the death of Nicole Brown. • Simpson had fresh cuts on his left hand the day after the murder. • Blood on OJ’s sock matched the blood of Nicole Brown. • Hair Fibers similar to Simpson’s hair XL Aris Gloves • During the trial Simpson was asked to try on the exact pair of gloves from the crime scene. • Simpson bought a pair of these gloves at Bloomingdale’s • Simpson’s Lawyer asked to try on the gloves with latex gloves on underneath the Aris Gloves Size 12 Bruno Magli Shoes • Simpson was also asked to try on these pair of size 12 Bruno Magli Shoes • The shoe print was found at the crime scene which match the pair that Simpson had in a size 12 The Bronco • Simpson try to escape the cops in a white Ford Bronco which was reported to be covered with blood on the inside of the car. Fresh cuts on hand • The day after the murder of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman fresh cuts were found on Simpsons left hand Hair Fiber • The Hair fibers found at the Crime Scene matched Simpson’s. Bloody sock matching Nicole Brown’s • These socks were found in Simpson bed room they matched the blood type from the crime scene of Nicole browns blood. Witnesses in the OJ Simpson Case Mark Wittkamp, Jane Murphy, Richie Myers, & Danielle LoGuercio • OJ SIMPSON TRIAL • Also known as the “People of the State of California vs Orenthal James Simpson” • Opening statements started on January 24, 1995 and until the verdict was reached on October 3, 1995 • OJ Simpson (Former actor and football star) was tried on two counts of murder: • Murder of his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson • Murder of waiter, Ronald Lyle Goodman • It became the most publicized case in US history. • Was the longest trial ever held in California, costing over $20 million to fight and defend, running up 50,000 pages of trial transcript in the process. •There were 150 witnesses called to give evidence before a jury that was sequestered at the Hotel Intercontinental in downtown L.A. from January until October. •Here are our key players Jose Camacho • Knife salesman at Ross Cutlery who claimed to have sold Simpson a 15-inch (380mm) German- made knife similar to the murder weapon three weeks before the murder. Cynthia Shahian •A friend and jogging partner of Nicole Simpson. •Testified on Monday, February 6th •Said Nicole Simpson was “distraught” after she received a letter from her ex-husband saying she could no longer use his mansion as her legal address. Detective John Edwards •Replied to the 911 phone call from Nicole Brown Simpson •She screamed that her husband was, “going to kill me.” DNA EVIDENCE AT THE SCENE -Trail of blood from inside Ford Bronco to Rockingham House -Bloody Rockingham Glove -Bundy -Bloody Socks in Rockingham Bedroom Robin Cotton -Advocated that drops of blood found near Brown and Goldman originated from OJ Simpson.
Recommended publications
  • Impartiality: a Comparison of Legal Processes in the United States and Italy
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Undergraduate Honors Theses 2020-04-01 IMPARTIALITY: A COMPARISON OF LEGAL PROCESSES IN THE UNITED STATES AND ITALY Robert Borden Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Borden, Robert, "IMPARTIALITY: A COMPARISON OF LEGAL PROCESSES IN THE UNITED STATES AND ITALY" (2020). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 116. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht/116 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Honors Thesis IMPARTIALITY: A COMPARISON OF LEGAL PROCESSES IN THE UNITED STATES AND ITALY by Robert Borden Submitted to Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of graduation requirements for University Honors Italian Department Brigham Young University April 2020 Advisors: Dr. Marie Orton, Dr. Dan Paul, and Dr. Justin Collings Honors Coordinator: Dr. Marie Orton ii ABSTRACT IMPARTIALITY: A COMPARISON OF LEGAL PROCESSES IN THE UNITED STATES AND ITALY Robert L. Borden Italian Department Bachelor of Arts This thesis examines the constitutional guarantees of impartiality granted in both the United States and Italian constitutions. Aided by the presentation of these two constitutional legal systems, this paper will attempt to break apart the elements of each system and point out key differences. By pointing out the differences in these systems including variations in their founding documents, the structure of the courts, the role of the judges, the role of the advocates, and the role of other key players, this paper will show that while individual cases in both countries are exposed to multiple biases throughout the legal process, in the end justice is given impartially.
    [Show full text]
  • Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Satisfy a Civil Judgment? Hastings H
    Journal of Intellectual Property Law Volume 15 | Issue 1 Article 4 October 2007 Squeezing "The uiceJ ": Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Satisfy A Civil Judgment? Hastings H. Beard University of Georgia School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Hastings H. Beard, Squeezing "The Juice": Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Satisfy A Civil Judgment?, 15 J. Intell. Prop. L. 143 (2007). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl/vol15/iss1/4 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Intellectual Property Law by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. Please share how you have benefited from this access For more information, please contact [email protected]. Beard: Squeezing "The Juice": Can the Right of Publicity Be Used to Sati NOTES SQUEEZING "THEJUICE": CAN THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY BE USED TO SATISFY A CIVIL JUDGMENT? TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................... 144 II. BACKGROUND ............................................ 147 A. THE ORIGIN OF THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY .................... 148 B. THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY AS A PROPERTY RIGHT ............... 151 1. Significance of the ProperyLabel in Legal Contexts .............. 151 2. Assignabiliy of the Right of Publiciy ........................ 154 C. TREATMENT OF OTHER FORMS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: COMPETING INTERESTS .................................. 157 D. PRINCIPLES OF TORT LAW ................................. 159 1. Function of the Law of Torts ............................... 159 2. Poliy Considerations .................................... 160 III. D ISCUSSION ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of Pennsylvania Law Review
    University of Pennsylvania Law Review FOUNDED 1852 ________________ Formerly American Law Register ________________________ VOL. 157 APRIL 2009 NO.4 ARTICLE PROSECUTORIAL REGULATION VERSUS PROSECUTORIAL ACCOUNTABILITY † STEPHANOS BIBAS No government official has as much unreviewable power or discretion as the prosecutor. Few regulations bind or even guide prosecutorial discretion, and fewer still work well. Most commentators favor more external regulation by legis- latures, judges, or bar authorities. Neither across-the-board legislation nor ex post review of individual cases has proven to be effective, however. Drawing on man- agement literature, this Article reframes the issue as a principal-agent problem and suggests corporate strategies for better serving the relevant stakeholders. Fear of voters could better check prosecutors, as could victim participation in individ- † Professor, University of Pennsylvania Law School. B.A., Columbia; B.A., M.A., Oxford; J.D., Yale. E-mail: stephanos *dot* bibas *at* gmail *dot* com. Thanks to Rachel Barkow, Richard Bierschbach, Paul Butler, Adam Cox, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, Margareth Etienne, Jeffrey Fagan, Jacob Gersen, Bernard Harcourt, Todd Henderson, Douglas Lichtman, Erik Luna, Richard McAdams, Tracey Meares, John Pfaff, Randal Picker, Eric Posner, Margaret Raymond, Jacqueline Ross, Carol Steiker, Lior Strahilevitz, Ronald Wright, and participants in the University of Chicago Crimi- nal Justice Roundtable for their thoughts and comments and to Jordan Esbrook and Brian Raimondo for research assistance. (959) 960 University of Pennsylvania Law Review [Vol. 157: 959 ual cases. Scholars have largely neglected the most promising avenue of reform, namely changing the internal structure and management of prosecutors’ offices. Leaders could do more to develop office cultures, norms, and ideals that value more than maximizing conviction statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Things the Ethical Lawyer Can Learn from the OJ Trial Richard Jolley and Brian Augenthaler
    4/12/2017 10 Things the Ethical Lawyer Can Learn From the OJ Trial Richard Jolley and Brian Augenthaler OJ murdered Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman • Murders: June 12, 1994 • Brentwood, L.A. • Arrested: June 17, 1994 • Arraignment: June 20, 1994 • Verdict: October 3, 1995 1 4/12/2017 5 “killer” pieces of physical evidence • Ron Goldman and Nicole Simpson’s blood in OJ’s Bronco • OJ’s blood at the Bundy crime scene • Bloody glove at Bundy and the bloody glove at OJ’s house • Bloody footprints at scene matching bloody footprint in OJ’s Bronco • Trace evidence – hair and fiber evidence linking OJ to crime scene and Goldman Goldman’s blood in the Bronco • The Bronco was locked and was not accessed until the tow yard • LAPD detectives asked Kato if he had spare keys the morning after the murders • Mark Furhman was never in the Bronco (mistake spare tire testimony) 2 4/12/2017 OJ’s blood at Bundy • OJ’s blood drops next to bloody Bruno Magli size-12 shoe print (1 in 170 million) • OJ’s blood on back gate (1 in 58 billion!) • Phil Vanatter planted it on the gate? Bloody gloves • Aris XL cashmere-lined gloves (less than 200 pair sold exclusively by Bloomingdales) (unavailable west of Chicago) • Receipt for identical gloves purchased by Nicole Brown Simpson in December 1990 (and photos of OJ wearing those gloves) • Left glove found at Bundy crime scene and right glove found by Mark Fuhrman • Blood and hair of victims and Simpson found on gloves • How did Mark Fuhrman get lucky and plant a glove that OJ wore? How did Fuhrman get OJ’s blood unless
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Inimitable Sarah Paulson Is the Future Of
    he won an Emmy, SAG Award and Golden Globe for her bravura performance as Marcia Clark in last year’s FX miniseries, The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story, but it took Sarah Paulson almost another year to confirm what the TV industry really thinks about her acting chops. Earlier this year, her longtime collaborator and O.J. executive producer Ryan Murphy offered the actress the lead in Ratched, an origin story he is executive producing that focuses on Nurse Ratched, the Siconic, sadistic nurse from the 1975 film One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Murphy shopped the project around to networks, offering a package for the first time that included his frequent muse Paulson attached as star and producer. “That was very exciting and also very scary, because I thought, oh God, what if they take this out, and people are like, ‘No thanks, we’re good. We don’t need a Sarah Paulson show,’” says Paulson. “Thankfully, it all worked out very well.” In the wake of last year’s most acclaimed TV performance, everyone—TV networks and movie studios alike—wants to be in business with Paulson. Ratched sparked a high-stakes bidding war, with Netflix ultimately fending off suitors like Hulu and Apple (which is developing an original TV series strategy) for the project last month, giving the drama a hefty Why the inimitable two-season commitment. And that is only one of three high- profile TV series that Paulson will film over the next year. In Sarah Paulson is the 2018, she’ll begin production on Katrina, the third installment in Murphy’s American Crime Story anthology series for FX, and continue on the other Murphy FX anthology hit that future of TV.
    [Show full text]
  • International Society of Barristers Quarterly
    International Society of Barristers Volume 52 Number 2 ATTICUS FINCH: THE BIOGRAPHY—HARPER LEE, HER FATHER, AND THE MAKING OF AN AMERICAN ICON Joseph Crespino TAMING THE STORM: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF JUDGE FRANK M. JOHNSON JR. AND THE SOUTH’S FIGHT OVER CIVIL RIGHTS Jack Bass TOMMY MALONE: THE GUIDING HAND SHAPING ONE OF AMERICA’S GREATEST TRIAL LAWYERS Vincent Coppola THE INNOCENCE PROJECT Barry Scheck Quarterly Annual Meetings 2020: March 22–28, The Sanctuary at Kiawah Island, Kiawah Island, South Carolina 2021: April 25–30, The Shelbourne Hotel, Dublin, Ireland International Society of Barristers Quarterly Volume 52 2019 Number 2 CONTENTS Atticus Finch: The Biography—Harper Lee, Her Father, and the Making of an American Icon . 1 Joseph Crespino Taming the Storm: The Life and Times of Judge Frank M. Johnson Jr. and the South’s Fight over Civil Rights. 13 Jack Bass Tommy Malone: The Guiding Hand Shaping One of America’s Greatest Trial Lawyers . 27 Vincent Coppola The Innocence Project . 41 Barry Scheck i International Society of Barristers Quarterly Editor Donald H. Beskind Associate Editor Joan Ames Magat Editorial Advisory Board Daniel J. Kelly J. Kenneth McEwan, ex officio Editorial Office Duke University School of Law Box 90360 Durham, North Carolina 27708-0360 Telephone (919) 613-7085 Fax (919) 613-7231 E-mail: [email protected] Volume 52 Issue Number 2 2019 The INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF BARRISTERS QUARTERLY (USPS 0074-970) (ISSN 0020- 8752) is published quarterly by the International Society of Barristers, Duke University School of Law, Box 90360, Durham, NC, 27708-0360.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Facts About Rosa Parks on Her 100Th Birthday
    100 Facts About Rosa Parks On Her 100th Birthday By Frank Hagler SHARE Feb. 4, 2013 On February 4 we will celebrate the centennial birthday of Rosa Parks. In honor of her birthday here is a list of 100 facts about her life. 1. Rosa Parks was born on Feb 4, 1913 in Tuskegee, Alabama. ADVERTISEMENT Do This To Fix Car Scratches This car gadget magically removes scratches and scuffs from your car quickly and easily. trynanosparkle.com 2. She was of African, Cherokee-Creek, and Scots-Irish ancestry. FEATURED VIDEOS Powered by Sen Gillibrand reveals why she's so tough on Al Franken | Mic 2020 NOW PLAYING 10 Sec 3. Her mother, Leona, was a teacher. 4. Her father, James McCauley, was a carpenter. 5. She was a member of the African Methodist Episcopal church. 6. She attended the Industrial School for Girls in Montgomery. 7. She attended the Alabama State Teachers College for Negroes for secondary education. 8. She completed high school in 1933 at the age of 20. 9. She married Raymond Parker, a barber in 1932. 10. Her husband Raymond joined the NAACP in 1932 and helped to raise funds for the Scottsboro boys. 11. She had no children. 12. She had one brother, Sylvester. 13. It took her three tries to register to vote in Jim Crow Alabama. 14. She began work as a secretary in the Montgomery chapter of the NAACP in 1943. 15. In 1944 she briefly worked at Maxwell Air Force Base, her first experience with integrated services. 16. One of her jobs within the NAACP was as an investigator and activist against sexual assaults on black women.
    [Show full text]
  • Turning the Camera on Court TV: Does Televising Trials Teach Us Anything About the Real Law?
    Turning the Camera on Court TV: Does Televising Trials Teach Us Anything About the Real Law? ANGELIQUE M. PAUL* I. INTRODUCTION What people think about the law is important because ours is a "public opinion" society, "which makes heavy use of referenda, and in which government does not lift a finger or move a muscle without reading the tea leaves of public desire."' The public's perception of justice influences the courts, the laws, the judges, and essentially the democratic process. So what influences the public's perception of justice? Television. For the majority of Americans, television is the most important source of information, and for many it is the only source of information. 2 This is particularly true when it comes to gathering information about the law. Because the majority of Americans have had no personal experience with the legal system,3 and because the majority of Americans get their information about the world solely from television, 4 the portrayal of justice on television is extremely important not only to the continued viability of the legal system, but also to the individual's understanding of that system. Studies indicate that the * The author would like to thank her parents, David and Lynda Paul, for their unconditional love and support. I David A. Harris, The Appearance of Justice: Court TV, Conventional Television, and Public Undersandingof the Criminal Justice Sstem, 35 ARiz. L. REv. 785, 796 (1993) (quoting Lawrence Friedman, Law, Lawyers, and Popular Culture, 98 YALE L. J. 1579, 1597 (1989)). Friedman believes that the portrayal of the legal system in popular culture is important "because it ultimately helps shape the legal culture, which in turn influences the law itself." Id.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 0- Do Not Enter Social Security Numbers on This Form As It May Be Made Public
    l efile GRAPHIC p rint - DO NOT PROCESS As Filed Data - DLN: 93491085004025 OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990-PF Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation Department of the Treasury 2014 0- Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Internal Revenue Service 0- Information about Form 990-PF and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990pf . For calendar year 2014, or tax year beginning 01-01-2014 , and ending 12-31-2014 Name of foundation A Employer identification number Roth Family Foundation 88-0352682 Number and street ( or P 0 box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite 6 ieiepnone number ( see instructions) 12021 Wilshire Boulevard Room 505 (213) 880-8528 City or town, state or province , country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending, check here F Los Angeles, CA 90025 G Check all that apply r'Initial return r'Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations , check here (- r Final return r'Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 850/, r-Address change r'Name change test, check here and attach computation F E If private foundation status was terminated H C heck type of organization Section 501( c)(3) exempt private foundation und er section 507 ( b )( 1 )( A ), c hec k here F_ Section 4947( a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust r'Other taxable private foundation I Fair market value of all assets at end J Accounting method F Cash F Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60 - month termination of year (from Part II, col.
    [Show full text]
  • First Chair Award Conference Announces Christopher Darden As Keynote Speaker
    Law Firm Newswire Attorney Press Releases and Legal News http://www.lawfirmnewswire.com First Chair Award Conference Announces Christopher Darden as Keynote Speaker Christopher Darden, Esq. Chicago, IL (Law Firm Newswire) May 2, 2018 - Christopher Darden will be the keynote speaker at the Annual First Chair Awards Conference, August 29 at the Gleacher Center in Chicago, Illinois. Christopher Darden is perhaps best known for his contributions to the Los Angeles County District Attorney's prosecution team in the 1995 O.J. Simpson murder trial. The case thrust Darden and his co-counsel Marcia Clark into a media frenzy, with the issue of race hovering over many aspects of the case. In recent years, the trial has become the subject of renewed media attention. In March 2018 Darden was featured on the special, O.J. Simpson: The Lost Confession? as part of a panel of experts who added commentary and analysis intercut with sections of a never-before-seen 2006 interview. The Simpson murder case was also revisited in the 2016 FX miniseries The People V. O.J. Simpson and the 10-part ESPN documentary O.J.: Made in America. Darden is a criminal defense attorney at Darden Law Group, APC, where he specializes in white collar, narcotics, homicide, gangs and public corruption cases. He wrote an autobiography, In Contempt, and co-wrote several crime thriller novels including The Last Defense with Dick Lochte. Darden was an adjunct professor of law at Southwestern University School of Law and has appeared on Oprah, Dr. Oz, Today with Megyn Kelly, CNN, Fox News Network and CourtTV.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts Are Stubborn Things": Protecting Due Process from Virulent Publicity
    Touro Law Review Volume 33 Number 2 Article 8 2017 "Facts Are Stubborn Things": Protecting Due Process from Virulent Publicity Benjamin Brafman Darren Stakey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview Part of the Civil Procedure Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Brafman, Benjamin and Stakey, Darren (2017) ""Facts Are Stubborn Things": Protecting Due Process from Virulent Publicity," Touro Law Review: Vol. 33 : No. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol33/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Touro Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Brafman and Stakey: Facts Are Stubborn Things “FACTS ARE STUBBORN THINGS”: PROTECTING DUE PROCESS FROM VIRULENT PUBLICITY by Benjamin Brafman, Esq.* and Darren Stakey, Esq.** *Benjamin Brafman is the principal of a seven-lawyer firm Brafman & Associates, P.C. located in Manhattan. Mr. Brafman’s firm specializes in criminal law with an emphasis on White Collar criminal defense. Mr. Brafman received his law degree from Ohio Northern University, in 1974, graduating with Distinction and serving as Manuscript Editor of The Law Review. He went on to earn a Masters of Law Degree (LL.M.) in Criminal Justice from New York University Law School. In May of 2014, Mr. Brafman was awarded an Honorary Doctorate from Ohio Northern University Law School. Mr. Brafman, a former Assistant District Attorney in the Rackets Bureau of the New York County District Attorney’s Office, has been in private practice since 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • OJ Simpson Murder Trial DVD Cataloging Still in Progress
    OJ SIMPSON MURDER TRIAL O.J. Simpson "Bronco Chase" audio CD (full transcript can be seen here) OJ Simpson Murder Trial DVD Collection (each disc is roughly 4 hours) Two hundred 4 hr. DVD's, professionally edited (100% commercial free) - contains virtually every minute of testimony. Recorded from local L.A. television stations, live as the events unfolded. Coverage begins with reports of the murders, till weeks after the verdict - and beyond. "O.J. Simpson - The Whole Story (and then some)" legend: "break" = fade to black, edited commercial break "H/C" = Hard Copy "ET" = Entertainment Tonight * To purchase, or inquire about OJ SImpson Murder Trial DVD duplications, click here * * To download a .pdf file of this OJ SImpson Murder Trial DVD listing, click here (322 KB) * OJ TRIAL #001 DVD (3:53:00) * News reports of the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman (ABC News, FX) * OJ waiting in truck outside of his house (@ 0:01:10) * Taped earlier: end of freeway chase, to Parker Center, news reports (@ 0:50:00) * Gil Garcetti, Commander Gascon: recap of charges (@ 1:36:48) * OJ's mug shot released on 11 o'clock news (@ 2:23:00), recap of days events * Johnnie Cochran, Al Michaels on "NightLine" (@ 2:51:00) * KNBC Morning News recap of events (@ 2:58:00) * Criminal Courts Bldg. Pre-Trial Preliminary Hearing, KNBC - Judge Kathleen Kennedy-Powell (@ 3:02:00) * Michele Kestler - LAPD Crime Lab (@ 3:18:00), cross-examination (@ 3:49:00), recess (@ 3:52:00) * KNBC news-break. OJ TRIAL #002 DVD (3:58:45) * Live evidence search KNBC news * Michele Kestler cross-examination cont.
    [Show full text]