DOCSLIB.ORG

Halftracked Vehicles of the German Army 1909-1945 Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Halftracked Vehicles of the German Army 1909-1945 Pdf, Epub, Ebook HALFTRACKED VEHICLES OF THE GERMAN ARMY 1909-1945 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Walter J. Spielberger | 176 pages | 06 May 2008 | Schiffer Publishing Ltd | 9780764329425 | English | Atglen, United States Halftracked Vehicles of the German Army 1909-1945 PDF Book As the war progressed and the German army had less and less equipment to utilize, the Sd. By the second day, Model had lost contact with the commander of his 15th Army, General Gustav-Adolf von Zangen, whom he presumed captured or killed. The bridge lifted off its foundations, then settled back down again—intact. In the Ruhr, however, the US Army lived the dream: establishing full-spectrum dominance to win decisive victory at minimal cost. In both variants, the armour was useful only for stopping small-arms fire and small artillery fragments. World War II armored fighting vehicles of Romania. It builds into a very nice replica out of the box and is a welcome addition to the growing list of German Half-Tracks in plastic following on from Tamiya's superb FAMO. Sign In Don't have an account? A tough scrap ensued over the next two days, and, when General Rose came up to supervise the fight on March 30th, he was killed when his personal reconnaissance column—two jeeps, a motorcycle, and an armored car—had the bad luck to bump into German Tiger tanks from the th Battalion. Thankfully the tracks will glue using normal plastic glue or Tenax 7R in this case. This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia view authors. Slovakia split from Czechoslovakia and formed its own state on March 14, It presents an opportunity for not only military collectors, but also for motorcycle collectors seeking something especially unique for their collection. This example from Bonhams appears to have been well-preserved and is reportedly in running condition. His operational plan called for a classic pincer maneuver by two armies. The vehicle was used in a wide variety of roles throughout World War II. As mentioned the cab interior was painted during assembly. The 5th Panzer was defending the Ruhr, one of the Reich's last remaining heavy industrial centers, home to the massive Krupp Steel Works at Essen, while 15th Army stood watch against the US bridgehead at Remagen. Not until March 29th did Simpson break through into the clear, heading east. Eisenhower, had a huge force under his command, five million men in three army groups: 21st in the north, consisting of British, Canadian, and US forces under Field Marshal Bernard Law Montgomery; the all-American 12th in the center under General Omar Bradley; and the 6th in the south, consisting of US and French forces under General Jacob L. Fan Feed 0 Main Page. Both tracks and wheels were used for steering. Adjustable padded shoulder straps. Suddenly and incredibly, the Allies were over the Rhine. By noon, all three US corps had made a clean breakthrough out of the Remagen bridgehead, advancing twelve miles the first day and twenty on the second. Panzers 35 t and 38 t and their Variants Hardback. Markings are provided for six vehicles:. The pace was frenetic and US infantry often hitched a ride on the nearest Sherman tank to keep up, rather than wait for their trucks. By , the Kettenkrad was operational and put to heavy service for the invasion of the Soviet Union. Although the parachute troops took heavy casualties, the crossing forces got over the Rhine against weak resistance and formed a bridgehead on the far bank. Cookies Ce site utilise des cookies, essentiels pour le bon fonctionnement de la boutique en ligne. As predicted, the going was slow, and 9th Army took a full week to chew through the Germans and the terrain, aided every step of the way by heavy US artillery fire and non-stop attacks by tactical air power. But when the task force reached Brilon, 15 miles south of Paderborn, the column halted while Richardson's exhausted force did a thorough reconnaissance of a champagne warehouse. Model's Army Group B—5th Panzer and 15th Armies, seven corps, and 19 divisions, with all their support troops and headquarters—was surrounded, trapped in an egg-shaped pocket 30 by 75 miles in diameter. Though he entered combat late in May , Carl Emmermann sank twenty-six Allied ships in The Ruhr's prosperous middle classes rushed to their local banks to pull out their Reichmarks, a currency that would soon be all but worthless. Wespe Halftracked Vehicles of the German Army 1909-1945 Writer Kfz 10 one-ton vehicle. We also use third-party cookies to prepare statistical information. Cookies Ce site utilise des cookies, essentiels pour le bon fonctionnement de la boutique en ligne. Even the weather cooperated, offering a crystal clear day that allowed XIX Tactical Air Command to roam the skies and swoop down at will on the hapless Germans below. This is a mechanical marvel which is arguably one of the simplest and best approaches to amphibious vehicle design and production during the war. For all the troubles the Germans had by this point in the war, those two armies were still strong enough to cause trouble—and mass casualties—to any attacker foolish enough to launch a frontal assault. Download as PDF Printable version. By noon, all three US corps had made a clean breakthrough out of the Remagen bridgehead, advancing twelve miles the first day and twenty on the second. Illustrated Encyclopedia of Military Vehicles , p. Product Details. Such vehicles were used in the Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe and Waffen-SS, where they served as personnel carriers, tractors, combat engineering vehicles, as well as self-propelled carriages for anti-aircraft guns. As the war progressed and the German army had less and less equipment to utilize, the Sd. All rights reserved. Jentz Technical Editor. Carry handle. The US Army, by contrast, came of age in the Ruhr. Overview One of the distinguishing features of the World War II German Army uniform is the use of shoulder straps and boards to denote rank, branch of service, and in some cases the assigned unit right down to the company. German armored fighting vehicle production during World War II. The Kettenkrad - Sd. These front-wheel steering vehicles with tracked drive transformed the fighting quality of the armoured divisions making it possible for the infantry, artillery and engineers to keep up with the speed of the Panzers' advance. Buying and Selling. Add to Favorites. Kfz variants in diverse theatres of war. Several special-purpose variants were seen early in the war. The cooks risked danger and…. Blocking the American path was a pair of German armies comprising Army Group B, , men, with 5th Panzer Army on the right and 15th Army on the left. Amelia Island, which hosts a variety of car shows and high-profile auctions every March in Florida, has become the venue to showcase German cars. It is worth reflecting that, without half-tracks, there could have been no Blitzkrieg. US soldiers defused the situation by entering the church, kneeling, and praying the Mass with the parishioners. European Theater of Operations. See details. When will my order be ready to collect? The bridge lifted off its foundations, then settled back down again—intact. Their material support—weapons, fuel, ammunition, food—was lavish. By , the US Army may have been the most effective ground force in history. View Product. Plus d'information. These two parts as do the other axles correctly show the offset found on the torsion bar suspension of these half-tracks. Containing over 1, color photographs of straps and boards, as well as other loose cloth insignia, collar tabs, and tunics to assist the collector or historian in identifying original examples, this book is the definitive reference. Army Group B's commander, Field Marshal Walter Model, was one of the most determined fighters left in Adolf Hitler's stable, a bitter-ender and a defensive specialist of great skill. Without a doubt, this Kettenkrad is one of the most bizarre-looking vehicles being offered at the Amelia Island auctions. Halftracked Vehicles of the German Army 1909-1945 Reviews Item Name-. Be the first to hear about our deals on our Telegram channel dealsFromUK. The ride of Task Force Richardson was an epic in miniature. Seizing the Ruhr and striking a blow at German heavy industry had been part of the Allied operational plan even before D-Day. By noon, all three US corps had made a clean breakthrough out of the Remagen bridgehead, advancing twelve miles the first day and twenty on the second. Army Group B's commander, Field Marshal Walter Model, was one of the most determined fighters left in Adolf Hitler's stable, a bitter- ender and a defensive specialist of great skill. These front-wheel steering vehicles with tracked drive transformed the fighting quality of the armoured divisions making it possible for the infantry, artillery and engineers to keep up with the speed of the Panzers' advance. Illustrated Encyclopedia of Military Vehicles. While the Americans maneuvered, Model and the Germans barely moved. Design is placed on front of shirt. The cooks risked danger and…. The two books, by authors Andrei Alexandrov and Genadi Petrov, illustrated with many previously unpublished It was easier said than done. German armoured fighting vehicles of World War II. Slovakia split from Czechoslovakia and formed its own state on March 14, Tatra also joined in production, but together both factories produced only vehicles in total. This can either be painted before or after attaching but as it is fairly exposed it is easy to paint after assembly so I glued it in place at this stage after drilling out the end of the pipe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Order of Battle, Mid-September 1940 Army Group a Commander-In-Chief
    Operation “Seelöwe” (Sea Lion) Order of Battle, mid-September 1940 Army Group A Commander-in-Chief: Generalfeldmarschall Gerd von Rundstedt Chief of the General Staff: General der Infanterie Georg von Sodenstern Operations Officer (Ia): Oberst Günther Blumentritt 16th Army Commander-in-Chief: Generaloberst Ernst Busch Chief of the General Staff: Generalleutnant Walter Model Operations Officer (Ia): Oberst Hans Boeckh-Behrens Luftwaffe Commander (Koluft) 16th Army: Oberst Dr. med. dent. Walter Gnamm Division Command z.b.V. 454: Charakter als Generalleutnant Rudolf Krantz (This staff served as the 16th Army’s Heimatstab or Home Staff Unit, which managed the assembly and loading of all troops, equipment and supplies; provided command and logistical support for all forces still on the Continent; and the reception and further transport of wounded and prisoners of war as well as damaged equipment. General der Infanterie Albrecht Schubert’s XXIII Army Corps served as the 16th Army’s Befehlsstelle Festland or Mainland Command, which reported to the staff of Generalleutnant Krantz. The corps maintained traffic control units and loading staffs at Calais, Dunkirk, Ostend, Antwerp and Rotterdam.) FIRST WAVE XIII Army Corps: General der Panzertruppe Heinric h-Gottfried von Vietinghoff genannt Scheel (First-wave landings on English coast between Folkestone and New Romney) – Luftwaffe II./Flak-Regiment 14 attached to corps • 17th Infantry Division: Generalleutnant Herbert Loch • 35th Infantry Division: Generalleutnant Hans Wolfgang Reinhard VII Army
    [Show full text]
  • Airpower in the Battle of the Bulge: a Case for Effects-‐‑Based Operations?
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies Airpower in the Battle of the Bulge: A Case for Effects-Based Operations? Harold R. Winton ȱ ȱ dzȱ ¢ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ throughout are those of a campaign on land in which the primary problem at the time is the defeat of an enemy army in the field.1 J.C. Slessor, 1936 ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ Ȃȱ work, Air Power and Armies, the published version of lectures he presented to his army brethren at the Staff College, Camberley in the mid-ŗşřŖǯȱ ȱ Ȃȱ ǰȱ ȱ paper is focused historically on an air effort to defeat an enemy army, or in this case an army groupȯField Marshal ȱȂȱ¢ȱ ȱǰȱȱȱȱ to which Adolf Hitler entrusted his last, desperate gamble to win World War IIȯa campaign that became known in history as the Battle of the Bulge. But in keeping with ȱ ȱ ȱ ȃ ȱ ǰȄȱ t will relate the course and consequences of that campaign to an ongoing doctrinal debate in the American armed forces over a concept known as Effects-Based Operations, or EBO. The issue on the table is to determine the 1 J.C. Slessor, Air Power and Armies (London: Oxford University Press, 1936), p. xi. ©Centre of Military and Strategic Studies, 2011 ISSN : 1488-559X JOURNAL OF MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES extent to which the evidence of using airpower in the Bulge confirms, qualifies, or refutes the tenets of EBO. While this question may seem somewhat arcane, it is not without consequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Patton Photographs
    Fighting Patton Photographs [A]Mexican Punitive Expedition pershing-villa-obregon.tif: Patton’s first mortal enemy was the commander of Francisco “Pancho” Villa’s bodyguard during the Mexican Punitive Expedition. Left to right: General Álvaro Obregón, Villa, Brig. Gen. John Pershing, Capt. George Patton. [A]World War I Patton_France_1918.tif: Col. George Patton with one of his 1st Tank Brigade FT17s in France in 1918. Diepenbroick-Grüter_Otto Eitel_Friedrich.tif: Prince Freiherr von.tif: Otto Freiherr Friedrich Eitel commanded the von Diepenbroick-Grüter, 1st Guards Division in the pictured as a cadet in 1872, Argonnes. commanded the 10th Infantry Division at St. Mihiel. Gallwitz_Max von.tif: General Wilhelm_Crown Prince.tif: Crown der Artillerie Max von Prince Wilhelm commanded the Gallwitz’s army group defended region opposite the Americans. the St. Mihiel salient. [A]Morocco and Vichy France Patton_Hewitt.tif: Patton and Rear Admiral Henry Kent Hewitt, commanding Western Naval Task Force, aboard the Augusta before invading Vichy-controlled Morocco in Operation Torch. NoguesLascroux: Arriving at Fedala to negotiate an armistice at 1400 on 11 November 1942, Gen. Charles Noguès (left) is met by Col. Hobart Gay. Major General Auguste Lahoulle, Commander of French Air Forces in Morocco, is on the right. Major General Georges Lascroux, Commander in Chief of Moroccan troops, carries a briefcase. Noguès_Charles.tif: Charles Petit_Jean.tif: Jean Petit, Noguès, was Vichy commander- commanded the garrison at in-chief in Morocco. Port Lyautey. (Courtesy of Stéphane Petit) [A]The Axis Powers Patton_Monty.tif: Patton and his rival Gen. Bernard Montgomery greet each other on Sicily in July 1943. The two fought the Axis powers in Tunisia, Sicily, and the European theater.
    [Show full text]
  • A War of Reputation and Pride
    A War of reputation and pride - An examination of the memoirs of German generals after the Second World War. HIS 4090 Peter Jørgen Sager Fosse Department of Archaeology, Conservation and History University of Oslo Spring 2019 1 “For the great enemy of truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest -- but the myth -- persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.” – John F. Kennedy, 19621 1John F. Kennedy, Yale University Commencement Address, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkyalecommencement.htm, [01.05.2019]. 2 Acknowledgments This master would not have been written without the help and support of my mother, father, friends and my better half, thank you all for your support. I would like to thank the University Library of Oslo and the British Library in London for providing me with abundant books and articles. I also want to give huge thanks to the Military Archive in Freiburg and their employees, who helped me find the relevant materials for this master. Finally, I would like to thank my supervisor at the University of Oslo, Professor Kim Christian Priemel, who has guided me through the entire writing process from Autumn 2017. Peter Jørgen Sager Fosse, Oslo, 01.05.2019 3 Contents: Introduction………………………………………………………………………...………... 7 Chapter 1, Theory and background………………………………………………..………17 1.1 German Military Tactics…………………………………………………..………. 17 1.1.1 Blitzkrieg, Kesselschlacht and Schwerpunkt…………………………………..……. 17 1.1.2 Examples from early campaigns……………………………………………..……… 20 1.2 The German attack on the USSR (1941)……………………………..…………… 24 1.2.1 ‘Vernichtungskrieg’, war of annihilation………………………………...………….. 24 1.2.2 Operation Barbarossa………………………………………………..……………… 28 1.2.3 Operation Typhoon…………………………………………………..………………. 35 1.2.4 The strategic situation, December 1941…………………………….……………….
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Army, 4 June 1916
    Russian Army 4 June 1916 Northwest Front: Finland Garrison: XLII Corps: 106th Infantry Division 421st Tsarskoe Selo Infantry Regiment 422nd Kolpino Infantry Regiment 423rd Luga Infantry Regiment 424th Chut Infantry Regiment 107th Infantry Division 425th Kargopol Infantry Regiment 426th Posinets Infantry Regiment 427th Pudozh Infantry Regiment 428th Lodeyinpol Infantry Regiment Sveaborg Border Brigade 1st Sveaborg Border Regiment 2nd Sveaborg Border Regiment Estonia Coast Defense: 108th Infantry Division 429th Riizhsk Infantry Regiment 430th Balksy Infantry Regiment 431st Tikhvin Infantry Regiment 432nd Baldaia Infantry Regiment Revel Border Brigade 1st Revel Border Regiments 2nd Revel Border Regiments Livonia Coast Defense: I Corps 22nd Novgorod Infantry Division 85th Vyborg Infantry Regiment 86th Wilmanstrand Infantry Regiment 87th Neschlot Infantry Regiment 88th Petrov Infantry Regiment 24th Pskov Infantry Division 93rd Irkhtsk Infantry Regiment 94th Yenisei Infantry Regiment 95th Krasnoyarsk Infantry Regiment 96th Omsk Infantry Regiment III Corps 73rd Orel Infantry Division 289th Korotoyav Infantry Regiment 290th Valuiisk Infantry Regiment 291st Trubchev Infantry Regiment 292nd New Archangel Infantry Regiment 5th Rifle Division (Suwalki) 17th Rifle Regiment 18th Rifle Regiment 19th Rifle Regiment 20th Rifle Regiment V Siberian Corps 1 50th St. Petersburg Infantry Division 197th Lesnot Infantry Regiment 198th Alexander Nevsky Infantry Regiment 199th Kronstadt Infantry Regiment 200th Kronshlot Infantry Regiment 6th (Khabarovsk) Siberian
    [Show full text]
  • Afrika Korps from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Afrika Korps From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "DAK" redirects here. For other uses, see DAK (disambiguation). Navigation Main page This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding Contents citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2008) Featured content The German Africa Corps (German: Deutsches Afrikakorps, DAK listen (help·info)), Deutsches Afrikakorps Current events or just the Afrika Korps, was the German expeditionary force in Libya and Tunisia Active 12 February 1941 – 13 May 1943 Random article during the North African Campaign of World War II. The reputation of the Afrika Korps Country Nazi Germany Donate to Wikipedia is synonymous with that of its first commander Erwin Rommel, who later commanded Branch Wehrmacht Heer the [1] Panzer Army Africa which evolved into the German-Italian Panzer Army Type Expeditionary Force Interaction (Deutsch-Italienische Panzerarmee) and Army Group Africa, all of which Afrika Korps was a distinct and principal component. Throughout the North African campaign, the Size Corps Help Afrika Korps fought against Allied forces until its surrender in May 1943. Garrison/HQ Tripoli, Italian Libya About Wikipedia Motto Ritterlich im Kriege, wachsam für den Community portal Contents Frieden Recent changes 1 Organization ("Chivalrous in War, Vigilant for Peace") Contact Wikipedia 2 Composition and terminology Colors Yellow, Brown 2.1 Ramcke Brigade
    [Show full text]
  • Heeresgruppe B (Army Group B)
    RECORDS OF GERMAN FIELD COMMANDS, ARMY GROUPS (PART II) Heeresgruppe B (Army Group B) Army Group B was formed from the prior Army Group North on October 5, 1939, and was placed in the West until September 1940 when it was moved, after a short stay in Germany, to the German-Soviet border area in occupied Poland. On April 1, 194-1, it was renamed Army Group Center. Army Group South was designated Army Group B in July 194-2 and controlled the armies advancing in the region between Stalingrad and Kursk. Disbanded in February 194-3 it was re-formed in May 194-3 as OKW-Auffrischungs- stab Rommel. In July 194-3 it was reorganized as Army Group B and was located in south Germany, the Balkans, north Italy, and France. The Army Group was charged with control of anti-invasion forces along the Channel coast and was commanded by Gen, Erwin Rommel until July 1944-• Field Marshal Guenter von Kluge took it over for a short time and from August 18, 1944, until the capitulation it was under Field Marshal Walter Model. Army Group B took part in operations in France and controlled the Ardennes counteroffensive,* Item Item No. Roll 1st Frame Ic, Anlage zum T'atigkeitsbericht. Reports relating to the political and military situation in Italy, Italy's capitulation, and disarmament of Italian units; also includes German military communiques. Jul 30 - Nov 14-, 194-3• 49354 276 Ic, Meldungen. Daily activity reports covering Allied progress in France. Jul 1 - Dec 31, 1944. 65881/1-2 276 195 Ic, Meldungen.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbarossa, Soviet Covering Forces and the Initial Period of War: Military History and Airland Battle
    WARNING! The views expressed in FMSO publications and reports are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. Barbarossa, Soviet Covering Forces and the Initial Period of War: Military History and Airland Battle Dr. Jacob W. Kipp Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS. 1989 The issues surrounding the German attack upon the Soviet Union in June 1941 continue to attract the attention of historians and military analysts. The nature of the Soviet response to that attack has, as recent articles in Air University Review suggest, set off heated polemics. The appearance of Bryan Fugate's Operation Barbarossa with its assertion that the Soviet High Command did, indeed, have a "realistic plan or operative concept for coping with the situation" marked a major departure from conventional Western scholarly interpretation of the events leading up to the invasion.1 The response by Williamson t1urray and Barry G. Watts that Fugate was "inventing history" to find an unsuspected Soviet military genius where there was none confirms the controversial nature of the issue.2 These authors underscore the impact of surprise and tend to treat it as systemic and general. The Soviet Union, they argue, did not expect the blow and was unprepared for it. Soviet military doctrine and field regulations spoke of the offensive, while neglecting the defense.3 In assessing Soviet perception of the German threat, the authors are at odds not
    [Show full text]
  • Military History Anniversaries 1 Thru 15 July
    Military History Anniversaries 1 thru 15 July Events in History over the next 15 day period that had U.S. military involvement or impacted in some way on U.S military operations or American interests JUL 00 1940 – U.S. Army: 1st Airborne Unit » In 1930, the U.S. Army experimented with the concept of parachuting three-man heavy-machine-gun teams. Nothing came of these early experiments. The first U.S. airborne unit began as a test platoon formed from part of the 29th Infantry Regiment, in July 1940. The platoon leader was 1st Lieutenant William T. Ryder, who made the first jump on August 16, 1940 at Lawson Field, Fort Benning, Georgia from a B-18 Bomber. He was immediately followed by Private William N. King, the first enlisted soldier to make a parachute jump. Although airborne units were not popular with the top U.S. Armed Forces commanders, President Franklin D. Roosevelt sponsored the concept, and Major General William C. Lee organized the first paratroop platoon. On a tour of Europe he had first observed the revolutionary new German airborne forces which he believed the U.S. Army should adopt. This led to the Provisional Parachute Group, and then the United States Army Airborne Command. General Lee was the first commander at the new parachute school at Fort Benning, in west-central Georgia. The U.S. Armed Forces regards Major General William C. Lee as the father of the Airborne. The first U.S. combat jump was near Oran, Algeria, in North Africa on November 8, 1942, conducted by elements of the 2nd Battalion, 509th Parachute Infantry Regiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Course of World War II Class 7 William A
    Course of World War II Class 7 William A. Reader [email protected] Ship Construction and Ship Losses U-boat Losses Year 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 U- boats 9 24 35 86 243 249 120 Lost Cum 33 68 154 397 646 766 Total Notes on Losses It was not until February 1943 that Allied ship construction tonnage exceeded that sunk by German submarines in the same month It was not until September 1943 that Allied ship construction tonnage exceeded the tonnage of all Allied ship losses • I.e Those sunk by German subs, German surface ships, Axis mines, and marine accidents in which ships capsized, ran aground, or collided with an obstacle or another ship The Cost of the War in the Atlantic From September 1939 to May 1945, the Allies lost 2,452 merchant ships and tankers in the Atlantic and 175 escort warships • Merchant tonnage loss was nearly 13 million GRT • The British lost 55,800 merchant seamen; the Americans 9,400 The Germans lost 766 out of their 1156 commissioned U-boats and 25,870 out of their 40,900 U-boat crewmen • 63 percent of the men were KIA and 75% became casualties • 66.3 percent of the U-boats were lost The German sub casualty rate far exceeded that suffered by any other service arm of any combatant country in the war What Won the Battle of the Atlantic The Allied use of airplanes and escort carriers (CVEs) The Allies had broken the German Navy code by use of Enigma The Allies found out that the Germans had broken the convoy codes and developed a new code that the Germans never broke The Allies developed a seaborne radio
    [Show full text]
  • German Defeat/Red Victory: Change and Continuity in Western and Russian Accounts of June-December 1941
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 2017+ University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2018 German Defeat/Red Victory: Change and Continuity in Western and Russian Accounts of June-December 1941 David Sutton University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1 University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Sutton, David, German Defeat/Red Victory: Change and Continuity in Western and Russian Accounts of June-December 1941, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • The 11Th Panzers in the Defense, 1944
    The 11 th Panzers in the Defense, 1944 by A. Harding Ganz frauleins,fu~e~!of the~si~ma'm'selles~fl;;~I;~ii~~:~~~~~~~~:i~~F~~~~~~~I;1 of sunny southern France, tan­ talized the weary Landsers ­ troopers - of the 11 th Panzer Division. The rumors were true: it was the spring of 1944, and the battered division was to be redeployed from the Russian Front to southern France for recuperation and re­ building. On the Ostfront, the brutal struggle continued un­ abated.· The Gennan defense of the Dnieper had been costly, as massive Russian of­ fensives resulted in huge en­ circlement battles at Korsun­ Cherkassy and Kamenets-Po­ dolsky. Fierce winter blizzards had alternated with the raspu­ titsa, the sudden spring thaws, that sank vehicles into the Ukrainian mud, and then froze them in solid again, as in con­ crete. The elated troopers boarded their trains near Kishinev, bound for Bordeaux. The rest of the division followed in May, by road and rail, via Bu­ dapest and Vienna. But even if the home of the 11 th was in Silesia, safely beyond the fighting fronts, Allied bomb­ ing of the homeland and talk of the expected invasion of ~,.~ Festung Europa by the British and Americans was sobering. Long gone were the dramatic days of the blitzkrieg through the Balkans and the drives on Kiev and Moscow. These had made the reputation of the Gespenster Panzer would wage a fighting with­ Even if Gennany were ultimately de­ Division - the "Ghost" Division, its drawal up the Rhone valley of south­ feated, the lith PD would generally emblem an eerie sword-wielding spec­ ern France against the advancing accomplish the difficult missions tre on a halftrack.
    [Show full text]