DOCSLIB.ORG

Lane County Historian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lane County Historian Lane County Historian River drive crew assembling with personal gear in final preparations before the Start of a log drive. Lane County Pioneer Museum LANE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Vol. XVIII, No. 2 Eugene, Oregon Summer, 1973 LANE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Mrs. C. A. Huntington, 740 West 13th Street, Eugene, Oregon 97402 President Stuart W. Hurd, Rt. 2, Box 345, Eugene, Oregon 97401 Membership Secretary LANE COUNTY HISTORIAN lnez Long Fortt (Mrs. James 0. Fortt) 1diter 3870 Watkins Lane, Eugene, Oregon 97405 The Lane County Historian is a quarterly publication of the Lane County Historical Society, a non-profit organization. Membership in the Lane County Historical Society includes subscription to the Lane County Historian. Annual dues: $3.00; family membership: $5.00. CONTENTS RIVER DRIVING IN LANE COUNTY 23 By Glenn Mason, Director, Lane County Pioneer Museum C. K. Spaulding's 1904 log drive. Logs were floated about 150 miles from up the Mckenzie River down the Willornette to Oregon City. Lane County Pioneer Museum 22 Kuer TbriuinjincJ.?ane Coun4, By Glenn Mason Introduction: This article should The author is indebted to many have been written at least ten years who helped to contribute to this ago. In a search through Lane manuscript; oral interviews w it h County for men still living who George McCornack and Hallie Hills drove logs down the McKenzie and Huntington, daughter of early Wil- Wi 1 lame t t e rivers, the author lamette River contractor and driver found only two, George McCornack Jasper Hills; an interview with Sid who drove the McKenzie and Mo- Stiers of Lowell, whose relatives hawk, and Henry Mathews, a Wil- drove the Willamette, recorded by lamette River driver. Another man Ron Finne during his research for whom the author had the pleasure his recent movie on old-time log- of meeting w a s Coambe Bolden ging, "Natural Timber Country," who worked on Walters' Long Tom provided new insights. River log drive. The same story For those of us, two or three was heard everywhere, "Oh, you generations removed from the should've talked to old .., he was river-driving era, photographs are an old-time river driver 'round our only means to visualize what it these parts. C o u r s e,he's dead might have been like to observe or now." This sad reply makes it ob- participate in a log drive. Again, vious that we should do all we can our gratitude to the people who to preserve the past through those gave or made available their old still living who have experienced photographs to the Lane County many of the events in our area's Pioneer Museum. Also, private col- history. lections of Louis Folley, Ron Ab- The oral history of first-hand ac- counts of experiences is an urgent rams and Hallie Huntington have and never-ending project. Inexpen- been used to document this story. sive tape-recorders are now avail- Not all the statements in the able and the cost is slight for the story have been footnoted. As the rewards of an interesting tape ses- author found similar references or sion with an old-timer who can re- descriptions of the same e v e n t late the history of an event or area such as the duties of the river drive in Lane County because he had crew, it was felt no footnote was been a part of it. The Lane County necessary. If anyone is interested Pioneer Museum is actively sup- porting an oral history program for in further documentation, read H. the collection of information about J. Cox-'s Random Lengths (Eugene, our local past. For further informa- Oregon, 1949) which has several tion on how anyone can help in sections on local river driving, or this 10 c a 1 oral history program, listen to tape recordings of the first please contact the museum, 740 and second-hand river driving ac- West 13th Avenue, Eugene, Oregon counts on file at the Lane County 97402. Pioneer Museum. 23 If there are errors in the descrip- Information on log driving is lacking for the next twenty years, but by the tions or the various accounts in 1870's, river driving was a common prac- the story, the author takes full re- tice on the McKenzie and Willamette sponsibility; this story is not in- rivers. The Laird brothers were making tended to be a definitive work on big drives from Fall Creek to the Eugene local log driving but the author's City Mill. Capt. N. L. Packard (Eugene Skinner's widow's husband), Ed Packard own interpretation of the period and W. Packard had contracts in 1871, of river driving in Lane County. It 1872, and 1873 to drive "Sugar pine" is just a beginning for history is an logs some fifty miles down the WiIlam on-going process of gathering facts ette to a Springfield mill. J. L. Brumley's mill,situated on the McKenzie River from the past. itis hoped that seven or eight miles north of Eugene, other old-time r i v e r drivers or received logs via the river as early as their relatives, will come forward 1875. About that same period George and contribute their knowledge and Larison was sending logs down the Wil- lamette to B. J. Pengra's mill at Spring- share their old photographs so that field.2 together we can piece together the In 1888 promoter George Melvin Miller exciting era of "River Driving in noted: Lane County." ". that many streams (in Lane * * * * * County) afford excellent facilities for floating or rafting . timber to the With logging trucks zipping along the mills or manufacturers below. In fact, back roads and freeways, itis hard to many million feet are thus rafted visualize that only 70 years ago the rivers down annually, even to thecities of Lane County were the pricipal means many miles below us." of getting logs to the sawmills. At some time or other most of the Water has leen used for transportation streams in Lane County have played as long as man has been on earth. His- a part in a logging operation. Rivers and torically, as wood came to be used for streams have often been dammed for construction it become necessary to cut log storage ponds. Poles, shingle bolts, and saw trees into more manageable and railroad ties have been floated, often sizes. Because timber was not always with the assistance of a series of flood available at the building site, the means dams, down many of the local streams. of transporting logs become a problem. Some rivers even had large full scale The answer in many instances was that log drives. However, when the old timers old standby, natural water power. The speak of THE DRIVES, they are referring first recorded log drive is the Bible's to those on the McKenzie and Willamette reference to cutting the cedars of Leb- rivers and their tributaries during the anon for King Solomon's temple.' height of river activity, 1890-1910. During The use of rivers for transporting logs those twenty years thousands upon thou- in Lane County dates from the very be- sands of logs were carried by the waters ginnings of permanent white settlement. of those two drainages to mills at Mabel, While some pioneers staked out Dona- Marcola, Wendling, Coburg, Springfield, tion Land Claims in areas where tim- Eugene and points north. ber was easily accessible for building This is not to slight in the least the needs, others chose land in the near drives or river drivers on the other treeless valley where good timber was rivers in Lane County. In 1905 the Wal- not readily available. In order to take ters Lumber Company of Elmira had a advantage of thissituation, the enter- drive from the riffle on Noti down the prising Hilyard Shaw, in the early 1850's, Long Tom River. W. C. Walters cele- developed a natural slough which ran brated the securing of the 2,000,000 feet through the northeast section of present- of logs at his Elmira mill by treating day Eugene into a millrace which gave the log drive crew to an oyster supper.4 power to several manufacturing plants, The Siuslaw River has always had the including a sawmill. With only cotton- reputation as one of the best streams wood, alder, and poplar growing along for running logs in Oregon, as it required the banks of the Willamette near Eugene, little or no driving. J. U. Sutherland of Shaw had to go several miles upriver to Florence noted in 1901 that "The water cut 500 good sawlogs which he floated at a logging stage, being very strong and down into his millrace. swift, carries, as a rule, 80-90% (of the 24 logs) down to the booms without any Some of the well known contractors assistance."s River drive crews on the in the late 1890's and the early 1900's Siuslaw were divided into two groups, along the McKenzie were Tom Gilliam one on each side of the river, and rolled and Jack Doyle who drove logs to a the few stranded logs along the edge spot near Armitage Park where the hack into deep water. logs were diverted into a narrow, shal- However good the Siuslaw was for low millrace to supply J.C. Goodale's driving logs, it is the McKenzie-Mohawk (after1900, Booth-Kelly's) mill at Co- and Willamette, at the turn of the cen- burg. The Montgomery brotherscon- tury, with their white water, exposed tracted all up and down the McKenzie- bedrock and shallow stretches with men- Mohawk Rivers for several local lumber acing gravel bars that stimulate the nos- companies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mckenzie River Sub-Basin Action Plan 2016-2026
    McKenzie River Sub-basin Strategic Action Plan for Aquatic and Riparian Conservation and Restoration, 2016-2026 MCKENZIE WATERSHED COUNCIL AND PARTNERS June 2016 Photos by Freshwaters Illustrated MCKENZIE RIVER SUB-BASIN STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN June 2016 MCKENZIE RIVER SUB-BASIN STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN June 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The McKenzie Watershed Council thanks the many individuals and organizations who helped prepare this action plan. Partner organizations that contributed include U.S. Forest Service, Eugene Water & Electric Board, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, McKenzie River Trust, Upper Willamette Soil & Water Conservation District, Lane Council of Governments and Weyerhaeuser Company. Plan Development Team Johan Hogervorst, Willamette National Forest, U.S. Forest Service Kate Meyer, McKenzie River Ranger District, U.S. Forest Service Karl Morgenstern, Eugene Water & Electric Board Larry Six, McKenzie Watershed Council Nancy Toth, Eugene Water & Electric Board Jared Weybright, McKenzie Watershed Council Technical Advisory Group Brett Blundon, Bureau of Land Management – Eugene District Dave Downing, Upper Willamette Soil & Water Conservation District Bonnie Hammons, McKenzie River Ranger District, U.S. Forest Service Chad Helms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jodi Lemmer, McKenzie River Trust Joe Moll, McKenzie River Trust Maryanne Reiter, Weyerhaeuser Company Kelly Reis, Springfield Office, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife David Richey, Lane Council of Governments Kirk Shimeall, Cascade Pacific Resource Conservation and Development Andy Talabere, Eugene Water & Electric Board Greg Taylor, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jeff Ziller, Springfield Office, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife MCKENZIE RIVER SUB-BASIN STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN June 2016 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Mckenzie River Watershed
    McKenzie River Watershed Baseline Monitoring Report 2000 to 2009 Karl A. Morgenstern David Donahue Nancy Toth Eugene Water & Electric Board January 2011 ii Acknowledgements The Eugene Water & Electric Board would like to acknowledge the various agencies and organizations that assisted with water quality sampling, providing guidance and input and assisting with the development of this document. McKenzie Watershed Council Water Quality Committee Members McKenzie Watershed Council Larry Six Mohawk Watershed Partnership Jared Weybright Weyerhaueser Company Maryanne Reiter Weyerhaueser Company Bob Danehy International Paper Company Loren Leighton U.S. Forest Service Dave Kreitzing U.S. Forest Service Bonnie Hammond U.S. Bureau of Land Management Steve Liebhardt U.S. Bureau of Land Management Janet Robbins City of Springfield Chuck Gottfried City of Springfield Todd Miller Springfield Utility Board Amy Chinitz Springfield Utility Board Dave Embleton Retired from Springfield Utility Board Chuck Davis Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality Chris Bayham Springfield School District Stuart Perlmeter Army Corps of Engineers Greg Taylor Eugene Water & Electric Board Karl Morgenstern Eugene Water & Electric Board David Donahue Eugene Water & Electric Board Nancy Toth Partners Providing Sampling Support, Database Support and Document Review U.S. Forest Service Mike Cobb U.S. Forest Service David Bickford City of Springfield Shawn Krueger Eugene Water & Electric Board Jared Rubin Eugene Water & Electric Board Bob DenOuden Eugene Water & Electric Board
    [Show full text]
  • Mckenzie River Subbasin Assessment Summary Table of Contents
    McKenzie River, ca. 1944 McKenzie River Subbasin Assessment Summary Report February 2000 McKenzie River, ca. 2000 McKenzie River, ca. 2000 Prepared for the McKenzie Watershed Council Prepared By: Alsea Geospatial, Inc. Hardin-Davis, Inc. Pacific Wildlife Research, Inc. WaterWork Consulting McKenzie River Subbasin Assessment Summary Table of Contents High Priority Action Items for Conservation, Restoration, and Monitoring 1 The McKenzie River Watershed: Introduction 8 I. Watershed Overview 9 II. Aquatic Ecosystem Issues & Findings 17 Recommendations 29 III. Fish Populations Issues & Findings 31 Recommendations 37 IV. Wildlife Species and Habitats of Concern Issues & Findings 38 Recommendations 47 V. Putting the Assessment to work 50 Juvenile Chinook Habitat Modeling 51 Juvenile Chinook Salmon Habitat Results 54 VI. References 59 VII. Glossary of Terms 61 The McKenzie River Subbasin Assessment was funded by grants from the Bonneville Power Administration and the U.S. Forest Service. High Priority Action Items for Conservation, Restoration, and Monitoring Our analysis indicates that aquatic and wildlife habitat in the McKenzie River subbasin is relatively good yet habitat quality falls short of historical conditions. High quality habitat currently exists at many locations along the McKenzie River. This assessment concluded, however, that the river’s current condition, combined with existing management and regulations, does not ensure conservation or restoration of high quality habitat in the long term. Significant short-term improvements in aquatic and wildlife habitat are not likely to happen through regulatory action. Current regulations rarely address remedies for past actions. Furthermore, regulations and the necessary enforcement can fall short of attaining conservation goals. Regulations are most effective in ensuring that habitat quality trends improve over the long period.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohawk/Mcgowan Watershed Analysis
    MOHAWK/McGOWAN WATERSHED ANALYSIS BLM MAY 1995 Chapter 1 Introduction What Is Watershed Analysis Watershed analysis is a systematic procedure for characterizing watershed and ecological processes to meet specific management and social objectives. Throughout the analytical process the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is trying to gain an understanding about how the physical, biological, and social processes are intertwined. The objective is to identify where linkages and processes (functions) are in jeopardy and where processes are complex. The physical processes at work in a watershed establish limitations upon the biological relationships. The biological adaptations of living organisms balance in natural systems; however, social processes have tilted the balance toward resource extraction. The BLM attempt in the Mohawk/McGowan analysis is to collect baseline resource information and understand where physical, biological and social processes are or will be in conflict. What Watershed Analysis Is NOT Watershed analysis is not an inventory process, and it is not a detailed study of everything in the watershed. Watershed analysis is built around the most important issues. Data gaps will be identified and subsequent iterations of watershed analysis will attempt to fill in the important pieces. Watershed analysis is not intended to be detailed, site-specific project planning. Watershed analysis provides the framework in the context of the larger landscape and looks at the "big picture." It identifies and prioritizes potential project opportunities. Watershed analysis is not done under the direction and limitations of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). When specific projects are proposed, more detailed project level planning will be done. An Environmental Assessment will be completed at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water in the Eugene-Springfield Area, Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Ground Water in the Eugene-Springfield Area, Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2018 Prepared in cooperation with the Oregon State Engineer Ground Water in the Eugene-Springfield Area, Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon By F. J. FRANK GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2018 Prepared in cooperation with the Oregon State Engineer UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600346 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Price: Paper cover $2.75, domestic postpaid; $2.50, GPO Bookstore Stock Number 2401-00277 CONTENTS Page Abstract ______________________ ____________ 1 Introduction _________ ____ __ ____ 2 Geohydrologic system ___________ __ _ 4 Topography _____________ ___ ____ 5 Streams and reservoirs ______ ___ _ __ _ _ 5 Ground-water system ______ _ _____ 6 Consolidated rocks __ _ _ - - _ _ 10 Unconsolidated deposits ___ _ _ 10 Older alluvium ____ _ 10 Younger alluvium __ 11 Hydrology __________________ __ __ __ 11 Climate _______________ _ 12 Precipitation ___________ __ 12 Temperature -__________ 12 Evaporation _______ 13 Surface water __________ ___ 14 Streamflow _ ____ _ _ 14 Major streams __ 14 Other streams ________ _ _ 17 Utilization of surface water _ 18 Ground water __________ _ __ ___ 18 Upland and valley-fringe areas 19 West side _________ __ 19 East side __________ ________________________ 21 South end ______________________________ 22 Central lowland ________ __ 24 Occurrence and movement of ground water 24 Relationship of streams to alluvial aquifers __ _ 25 Transmissivity and storage coefficient ___ _ 29 Ground-water storage _ __ 30 Storage capacity _ .
    [Show full text]
  • Subsistence Variability in the Willamette Valley Redacted for Privacy
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Francine M. Havercroft for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in Anthropology, History and Anthropology presented on June 16, 1986. Title: Subsistence Variability in the Willamette Valley Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: V Richard E. Ross During the summer of 1981, Oregon State University archaeologically tested three prehistoric sites on the William L. Finley National Wildlife Refuge. Among the sites tested were typical Willamette Valley floodplain and adjacent upland sites. Most settlement-subsistence pattern models proposed for the Willamette Valley have been generated with data from the eastern valley floor, western Cascade Range foothills. The work at Wm. L. Finley National Wildlife Refuge provides one of the first opportunities to view similar settings along the western margins of the Willamette Valley. Valley Subsistence Variabilityin the Willamette by Francine M. Havercroft A THESIS submitted to Oregon StateUniversity in partial fulfillmentof the requirementsfor the degree of Master of Arts in InterdisciplinaryStudies Completed June 15, 1986 Commencement June 1987 APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Professor of Anthropology inAT6cg-tof major A Redacted for Privacy Professor of History in charge of co-field Redacted for Privacy Professor of Anthropology in charge of co-field Redacted for Privacy Chairman of department of Anthropology Dean of Graduate School Date thesis is presented June 16, 1986 Typed by Ellinor Curtis for Francine M. Havercroft ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Throughout this project, several individuals have provided valuable contributions, and I extend a debt of gratitude to all those who have helped. The Oregon State university Archaeology field school, conducted atthe Wm. L. Finley Refuge, wasdirected by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for the Calapooya Divide, Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Karen Joyce Starr for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdiscinlinary Studies in Anthr000loay. Geogranhv, and _Agricultural and Resource Economics presented on October 1, 1982 Title: THE CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF MOUNTAIN REGIONS; IMPLICATIONS FOR THE QALAPOOYA DIVIDE. OREGON Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Thomas C. Hogg Altitudinal variations in upland regions of the earthcreate variable climatic zones and conditions. Plant andanimal communities must adapt to these conditions, andwhen theyreach their tolerance limits for environmental conditions at the upper levels of a zone, they cease to exist inthe environment. Humans also utilize mountains for a variety of reasons. The cultural traits which result from the adaptationof groups of people to mountainenvironments are unique from those of the surrounding lowlanders. Adaptation to upland areas is most often expressed in a transhumant or agro-pastoral lifestyle attuned to the climatic variations and demands of the mountain environment. This distribution of cultural traits suggests thatmountains are considered unique culture areas, apart from but sharing sometraits in common with neighboring lowland areas. The Cultural Significance of Mountain Regions Implications for the Calapooya Divide, Oregon by Karen Joyce Starr A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies Completed October 1, 1982 Commencement June 1983 APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Professor of Anthropology in charge of major Redacted for Privacy Chairman of Department of Anthropology Redacted for Privacy AssociateiDrofssor of Geography in charge of minor Redacted for Privacy Profe4or of Agricultural and Resource Economics in charge of minor Redacted for Privacy Dean of Graduat chool Date thesis is presented October 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 State(S): Oregon Recovery Unit Name: Willamette River
    Chapter 5 State(s): Oregon Recovery Unit Name: Willamette River Recovery Unit Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and protect listed species. Plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery unit teams, contractors, State and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or indicate the approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Cited: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Chapter 5, Willamette River Recovery Unit, Oregon. 96 p. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Draft Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Two working groups are active in the Willamette River Recovery Unit: the Upper Willamette (since 1989) and Clackamas Bull Trout Working Groups. In 1999, these groups were combined, and, along with representation from the Santiam subbasin, comprise the Willamette River Recovery Unit Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Deaths: the Near Destruction of Western
    DAVID G. LEWIS Four Deaths The Near Destruction of Western Oregon Tribes and Native Lifeways, Removal to the Reservation, and Erasure from History THE NOTIONS OF DEATH and genocide within the tribes of western Oregon are convoluted. History partially records our removal and near genocide by colonists, but there is little record of the depth of these events — of the dramatic scale of near destruction of our peoples and their cultural life ways. Since contact with newcomers, death has come to the tribes of western Oregon in a variety of ways — through epidemic sicknesses, followed by attempted genocide, forced marches onto reservations, reduction of land holdings, broken treaty promises, attempts to destroy tribal culture through assimilation, and the termination of federal recognition of sovereign, tribal status. Death, then, has been experienced literally, culturally, legally, and even in scholarship; for well over a century, tribal people were not consulted and were not adequately represented in historical writing. Still, the people have survived, restoring their recognized tribal status and building structures to maintain and regain the people’s health and cultural well-being. This legacy of death and survival is shared by all the tribes of Oregon, though specific details vary, but the story is not well known or understood by the state’s general public. Such historical ignorance is another kind of death — one marked by both myth and silence. An especially persistent myth is the notion that there lived and died a “last” member of a particular tribe or people. The idea began in the late nineteenth century, when social scientists who saw population declines at the reservations feared that the tribes would die off before scholars could collect their data and complete their studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Prediction of the Water Temperature of the Mckenzie River, Oregon Using the Equilibrium Temperature Approach
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1986 Analysis and prediction of the water temperature of the McKenzie River, Oregon using the equilibrium temperature approach R. Peder Hansen Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, and the Environmental Engineering Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hansen, R. Peder, "Analysis and prediction of the water temperature of the McKenzie River, Oregon using the equilibrium temperature approach" (1986). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3610. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5494 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF R. Peder Hansen for the Master of Science in Engineering: Civil presented June 20, 1986. Title: Analysis and Prediction of the Water Temperature of the McKenzie River, Oregon, Using the Equilibrium Temperature Approach. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: ch, Chairman Richard R. Petersen A one dimensional, steady flow , unsteady temperature model is used to evaluate the effects of two U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) dams and resulting reservoirs on hourly water temperatures of the mainstem McKenzie River from Delta Park (RM 62.1) to Leaburg Dam (RM 38.8). Both COE projects are on tributaries to the McKenzie River and at present have only bottom withdrawl capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Appendices
    Upper Willamette River Conservation and Recovery Plan for Chinook Salmon and Steelhead FINAL – August 5, 2011 FINAL UPPER WILLAMETTE RIVER CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY PLAN FOR CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD August 5, 2011 APPENDICES Appendix A: Planning Team and Stakeholder Team Members ...............................................2 Appendix B: CATAS Support Information ................................................................................5 Appendix C: Background Material for Limiting Factors and Threats..................................32 Appendix D: SLAM Model Support Information ....................................................................36 Appendix E: Background Information on the Role of Chinook Hatcheries and Reintroduction Strategies for UWR Chinook above Willamette Project barriers and in other subbasins..............................................................................120 Appendix F: Related Management Plans and Conservation Efforts....................................137 Appendix G: Summary of State Programs to Implement Recovery Actions.......................146 Appendix H: Crosswalk of Terms - Limiting Factors, Threats, and Ecological Concerns ................................................................................................................................167 Appendix I: Methodology for Conservation Gaps..................................................................172 Appendix J: Summary of Analysis and Chapter Organization ............................................183 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Mohawk Watershed Partnership
    Final Report to the Mohawk Watershed Partnership Prepared by the Mohawk Watershed Education and Restoration Group 2003 Final Report to the Mohawk Watershed Partnership Prepared by the Mohawk Watershed Restoration and Education Group, Environmental Studies Service Learning Program, University of Oregon 2003 Contributing Authors: Andrew Berger Dave Irons Matthew Fisher Erin Rowland Megin Sabo Edited by Matthew Fisher and Steve Mital Service Learning Program University of Oregon Page 1 Contents Executive Summary 4 Chapter One: The Mohawk Valley 9 Introduction 9 Economic Issues 9 History Demographics Economic Growth and Development Strategic Planning Agriculture 15 Livestock 16 Flood History 17 Flood Mitigation 18 Illegal Trash Dumping 19 Recreational/Off Road Activity 21 Chapter Two: Survey Analysis 24 Introduction 24 Purpose Methodology 24 Survey Results 25 Survey Questions and Answers Further Analysis 30 Survey Conclusions 31 Recommendations 32 Chapter Three: Education & Outreach 34 Introduction 34 Watershed Enhancement & Education Posters 34 Purpose Methodology Mohawk Watershed Restoration Guide 35 Purpose Methodology Chapter Four: Water Quality Data 37 Introduction 37 Purpose The Issues Methodology Water Quality Parameters 39 Turbidity Dissolved Oxygen Water Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Service Learning Program University of Oregon Page 2 pH Stream flow Analysis 41 Turbidity in the Mohawk River Turbidity and Mean Monthly Stream flow at Hill Road pH levels in the Mohawk River Water Temperature and Mean Monthly Stream flow at Hill Road
    [Show full text]