DOCSLIB.ORG

Set Theory Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Set Theory Pdf, Epub, Ebook SET THEORY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kenneth Kunen | 412 pages | 02 Nov 2011 | College Publications | 9781848900509 | English | London, United Kingdom Set Theory PDF Book The foundational role of set theory for mathematics, while significant, is by no means the only justification for its study. For example, you and a new roommate decide to have a house party, and you both invite your circle of friends. This set is all of the elements that we may choose from. Functions 3. Set builder form In Set-builder set is described by a property that its member must satisfy. Should one be content with them being undecidable? The strongest large cardinal notions not known to be inconsistent, modulo ZFC, are the following:. From such axioms, all known mathematics may be derived. The notion of set is so simple that it is usually introduced informally, and regarded as self-evident. Answers This question can most easily be answered by creating a Venn diagram. Principles such as the axiom of choice and the law of the excluded middle can be formulated in a manner corresponding to the classical formulation in set theory or perhaps in a spectrum of distinct ways unique to type theory. How to cite this entry. Strong forcing axioms, such as the PFA and MM imply that all projective sets of reals are determined PD , and have many other strong consequences in infinite combinatorics. One tool that is helpful in depicting the relationship between different sets is called a Venn diagram. See the entry on independence and large cardinals for more details. The simplest sets of real numbers are the basic open sets i. This branch of mathematics forms a foundation for other topics. It turns out that PD implies that all projective sets of reals are regular, and Woodin has shown that, in a certain sense, PD settles essentially all questions about the projective sets. Set A set is a collection of distinct objects, called elements of the set A set can be defined by describing the contents, or by listing the elements of the set, enclosed in curly brackets. Mathematical topics typically emerge and evolve through interactions among many researchers. Combinatorial set theory concerns extensions of finite combinatorics to infinite sets. Author of Set Theory and Logic. Much stronger forcing axioms than MA were introduced in the s, such as J. Skip to main content. Kunen, K. Axiomatic set theory was originally devised to rid set theory of such paradoxes. The ordinal numbers that are not bijectable with any smaller ordinal are called cardinal numbers. Network architecture Network protocol Network components Network scheduler Network performance evaluation Network service. In doing mathematics, we do not discover pre-existing truths that were 'already there without one knowing' PG —we invent mathematics, bit-by-little-bit. Large cardinals are uncountable cardinals satisfying some properties that make them very large, and whose existence cannot be proved in ZFC. A synopsis of the history, written by van Heijenoort, can be found in the comments that precede von Neumann's There are also uncountable ordinals. Only recently have philosophers such as Crispin Wright begun to rehabilitate Wittgenstein's arguments. We can use these sets understand relationships between groups, and to analyze survey data. Interpreter Middleware Virtual machine Operating system Software quality. For example, it can be shown that regardless of whether a model V of ZF satisfies the continuum hypothesis or the axiom of choice , the inner model L constructed inside the original model will satisfy both the generalized continuum hypothesis and the axiom of choice. MA has many different equivalent formulations and has been used very successfully to settle a large number of open problems in other areas of mathematics. Thus, the CH holds for closed sets. Countable and uncountable sets 5. The metaphysical question of what the real numbers really are is irrelevant here. This assumption gives rise to paradoxes, the simplest and best known of which are Russell's paradox and the Burali-Forti paradox. Beyond supercompact cardinals we find the extendible cardinals, the huge , the super huge , etc. Set Theory Writer Axiomatic set theory was originally devised to rid set theory of such paradoxes. Licenses and Attributions. Power Sets The power set is the set all possible subset of the set S. Many properties of Borel sets can be established in ZFC, but proving these properties hold for more complicated sets requires additional axioms related to determinacy and large cardinals. Note: Empty set and set itself is also the member of this set of subsets. Set theory. He also showed that Woodin cardinals provide the optimal large cardinal assumptions by proving that the following two statements: There are infinitely many Woodin cardinals. This is called the cardinality of the set. Let us emphasize that it is not claimed that, e. While Karl Weierstrass and Dedekind supported Cantor, Leopold Kronecker , now seen as a founder of mathematical constructivism , did not. Since set theory was invented to provide mathematics with a foundation, it is, minimally, unnecessary. Large cardinals stronger than measurable are actually needed for this. A relation that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive is called an equivalence relation. It is also a subset of all British literature. Wikimedia Commons Wikibooks Wikiquote. The existence of large cardinals has dramatic consequences, even for simply-definable small sets, like the projective sets of real numbers. In set theory as Cantor defined and Zermelo and Fraenkel axiomatized, an object is either a member of a set or not. Main article: Cardinal characteristics of the continuum. To this day, the CH remains open. Representation of a Set A set can be represented by various methods. So, if we wish to take into account the order in which the two elements of a pair are given, we need to find another way of representing the pair. First-order Quantifiers Predicate Second-order Monadic predicate calculus. By , set theory was recognized as a distinct branch of mathematics. These illustrations now called Venn Diagrams. The empty set is the unique set is the set with no elements. For example, you and a new roommate decide to have a house party, and you both invite your circle of friends. Cohen, P. Set theory is the mathematical theory of well-determined collections, called sets , of objects that are called members , or elements , of the set. The AC was, for a long time, a controversial axiom. This would have to be defined by the context. Set Theory Reviews But everything indicates that their existence not only cannot be disproved, but in fact the assumption of their existence is a very reasonable axiom of set theory. Set theory is a fundamental concept throughout all of mathematics. The momentum of set theory was such that debate on the paradoxes did not lead to its abandonment. Only recently have philosophers such as Crispin Wright begun to rehabilitate Wittgenstein's arguments. A strengthening of this principle to second-order sentences yields some large cardinals. Example: Let A be a set of odd positive integers less than From such axioms, all known mathematics may be derived. ThoughtCo uses cookies to provide you with a great user experience. Many of these theorems are independent of ZFC, requiring stronger axioms for their proof. Zalta ed. Load Next Page. At this party, two sets are being combined, though it might turn out that there are some friends that were in both sets. In naive set theory, a set is a collection of objects called members or elements that is regarded as being a single object. For example, it can be shown that regardless of whether a model V of ZF satisfies the continuum hypothesis or the axiom of choice , the inner model L constructed inside the original model will satisfy both the generalized continuum hypothesis and the axiom of choice. The theory of constructible sets owes much to the work of Ronald Jensen. If there are a finite number n of elements in a set, then there are a total of 2 n subsets of A. Supplement to Set Theory Basic Set Theory Sets are well-determined collections that are completely characterized by their elements. Each set is represented with a circle. It is also needed to prove the existence of such simple sets as the set of hereditarily finite sets, i. From set theory's inception, some mathematicians have objected to it as a foundation for mathematics. As we already pointed out, one cannot prove in ZFC that large cardinals exist. Between the years and , the German mathematician and logician Georg Cantor created a theory of abstract sets of entities and made it into a mathematical discipline. As set theory gained popularity as a foundation for modern mathematics, there has been support for the idea of introducing basic theory, or naive set theory , early in mathematics education. This has important applications to the study of invariants in many fields of mathematics. Set Theory Read Online E-commerce Enterprise software Computational mathematics Computational physics Computational chemistry Computational biology Computational social science Computational engineering Computational healthcare Digital art Electronic publishing Cyberwarfare Electronic voting Video games Word processing Operations research Educational technology Document management. Benjamin, Inc. Facebook Twitter. Large cardinals stronger than measurable are actually needed for this. Set theory , branch of mathematics that deals with the properties of well-defined collections of objects, which may or may not be of a mathematical nature, such as numbers or functions. There are several possible reactions to this. Since all hereditarily-finite sets are constructible, we aim to add an infinite set of natural numbers. A rectangle represents the universal set for our problem. Some of these principles may be proven to be a consequence of other principles.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Elementary Set Theory
    1 Elementary Set Theory Notation: fg enclose a set. f1; 2; 3g = f3; 2; 2; 1; 3g because a set is not defined by order or multiplicity. f0; 2; 4;:::g = fxjx is an even natural numberg because two ways of writing a set are equivalent. ; is the empty set. x 2 A denotes x is an element of A. N = f0; 1; 2;:::g are the natural numbers. Z = f:::; −2; −1; 0; 1; 2;:::g are the integers. m Q = f n jm; n 2 Z and n 6= 0g are the rational numbers. R are the real numbers. Axiom 1.1. Axiom of Extensionality Let A; B be sets. If (8x)x 2 A iff x 2 B then A = B. Definition 1.1 (Subset). Let A; B be sets. Then A is a subset of B, written A ⊆ B iff (8x) if x 2 A then x 2 B. Theorem 1.1. If A ⊆ B and B ⊆ A then A = B. Proof. Let x be arbitrary. Because A ⊆ B if x 2 A then x 2 B Because B ⊆ A if x 2 B then x 2 A Hence, x 2 A iff x 2 B, thus A = B. Definition 1.2 (Union). Let A; B be sets. The Union A [ B of A and B is defined by x 2 A [ B if x 2 A or x 2 B. Theorem 1.2. A [ (B [ C) = (A [ B) [ C Proof. Let x be arbitrary. x 2 A [ (B [ C) iff x 2 A or x 2 B [ C iff x 2 A or (x 2 B or x 2 C) iff x 2 A or x 2 B or x 2 C iff (x 2 A or x 2 B) or x 2 C iff x 2 A [ B or x 2 C iff x 2 (A [ B) [ C Definition 1.3 (Intersection).
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics 144 Set Theory Fall 2012 Version
    MATHEMATICS 144 SET THEORY FALL 2012 VERSION Table of Contents I. General considerations.……………………………………………………………………………………………………….1 1. Overview of the course…………………………………………………………………………………………………1 2. Historical background and motivation………………………………………………………….………………4 3. Selected problems………………………………………………………………………………………………………13 I I. Basic concepts. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….15 1. Topics from logic…………………………………………………………………………………………………………16 2. Notation and first steps………………………………………………………………………………………………26 3. Simple examples…………………………………………………………………………………………………………30 I I I. Constructions in set theory.………………………………………………………………………………..……….34 1. Boolean algebra operations.……………………………………………………………………………………….34 2. Ordered pairs and Cartesian products……………………………………………………………………… ….40 3. Larger constructions………………………………………………………………………………………………..….42 4. A convenient assumption………………………………………………………………………………………… ….45 I V. Relations and functions ……………………………………………………………………………………………….49 1.Binary relations………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ….49 2. Partial and linear orderings……………………………..………………………………………………… ………… 56 3. Functions…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ….…….. 61 4. Composite and inverse function.…………………………………………………………………………… …….. 70 5. Constructions involving functions ………………………………………………………………………… ……… 77 6. Order types……………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………… 80 i V. Number systems and set theory …………………………………………………………………………………. 84 1. The Natural Numbers and Integers…………………………………………………………………………….83 2. Finite induction
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Sets and Pluralities
    Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Sistema de Información Científica Gustavo Fernández Díez Sets and Pluralities Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, vol. IX, núm. 19, 2009, pp. 5-22, Universidad El Bosque Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=41418349001 Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, ISSN (Printed Version): 0124-4620 [email protected] Universidad El Bosque Colombia How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journal's homepage www.redalyc.org Non-Profit Academic Project, developed under the Open Acces Initiative Sets and Pluralities1 Gustavo Fernández Díez2 Resumen En este artículo estudio el trasfondo filosófico del sistema de lógica conocido como “lógica plural”, o “lógica de cuantificadores plurales”, de aparición relativamente reciente (y en alza notable en los últimos años). En particular, comparo la noción de “conjunto” emanada de la teoría axiomática de conjuntos, con la noción de “plura- lidad” que se encuentra detrás de este nuevo sistema. Mi conclusión es que los dos son completamente diferentes en su alcance y sus límites, y que la diferencia proviene de las diferentes motivaciones que han dado lugar a cada uno. Mientras que la teoría de conjuntos es una teoría genuinamente matemática, que tiene el interés matemático como ingrediente principal, la lógica plural ha aparecido como respuesta a considera- ciones lingüísticas, relacionadas con la estructura lógica de los enunciados plurales del inglés y el resto de los lenguajes naturales. Palabras clave: conjunto, teoría de conjuntos, pluralidad, cuantificación plural, lógica plural. Abstract In this paper I study the philosophical background of the relatively recent (and in the last few years increasingly flourishing) system of logic called “plural logic”, or “logic of plural quantifiers”.
    [Show full text]
  • VENN DIAGRAM Is a Graphic Organizer That Compares and Contrasts Two (Or More) Ideas
    InformationVenn Technology Diagram Solutions ABOUT THE STRATEGY A VENN DIAGRAM is a graphic organizer that compares and contrasts two (or more) ideas. Overlapping circles represent how ideas are similar (the inner circle) and different (the outer circles). It is used after reading a text(s) where two (or more) ideas are being compared and contrasted. This strategy helps students identify Wisconsin similarities and differences between ideas. State Standards Reading:INTERNET SECURITYLiterature IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STRATEGY •Sit Integration amet, consec tetuer of Establish the purpose of the Venn Diagram. adipiscingKnowledge elit, sed diam and Discuss two (or more) ideas / texts, brainstorming characteristics of each of the nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt Ideas ideas / texts. ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam. Provide students with a Venn diagram and model how to use it, using two (or more) ideas / class texts and a think aloud to illustrate your thinking; scaffold as NETWORKGrade PROTECTION Level needed. Ut wisi enim adK- minim5 veniam, After students have examined two (or more) ideas or read two (or more) texts, quis nostrud exerci tation have them complete the Venn diagram. Ask students leading questions for each ullamcorper.Et iusto odio idea: What two (or more) ideas are we comparing and contrasting? How are the dignissimPurpose qui blandit ideas similar? How are the ideas different? Usepraeseptatum with studentszzril delenit Have students synthesize their analysis of the two (or more) ideas / texts, toaugue support duis dolore te feugait summarizing the differences and similarities. comprehension:nulla adipiscing elit, sed diam identifynonummy nibh. similarities MEASURING PROGRESS and differences Teacher observation betweenPERSONAL ideas FIREWALLS Conferring Tincidunt ut laoreet dolore Student journaling magnaWhen aliquam toerat volutUse pat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Probability Set-Up.Pdf
    CHAPTER 2 The probability set-up 2.1. Basic theory of probability We will have a sample space, denoted by S (sometimes Ω) that consists of all possible outcomes. For example, if we roll two dice, the sample space would be all possible pairs made up of the numbers one through six. An event is a subset of S. Another example is to toss a coin 2 times, and let S = fHH;HT;TH;TT g; or to let S be the possible orders in which 5 horses nish in a horse race; or S the possible prices of some stock at closing time today; or S = [0; 1); the age at which someone dies; or S the points in a circle, the possible places a dart can hit. We should also keep in mind that the same setting can be described using dierent sample set. For example, in two solutions in Example 1.30 we used two dierent sample sets. 2.1.1. Sets. We start by describing elementary operations on sets. By a set we mean a collection of distinct objects called elements of the set, and we consider a set as an object in its own right. Set operations Suppose S is a set. We say that A ⊂ S, that is, A is a subset of S if every element in A is contained in S; A [ B is the union of sets A ⊂ S and B ⊂ S and denotes the points of S that are in A or B or both; A \ B is the intersection of sets A ⊂ S and B ⊂ S and is the set of points that are in both A and B; ; denotes the empty set; Ac is the complement of A, that is, the points in S that are not in A.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Structures: Sets, Functions, Sequences, and Sums 2-2
    CHAPTER Basic Structures: Sets, Functions, 2 Sequences, and Sums 2.1 Sets uch of discrete mathematics is devoted to the study of discrete structures, used to represent discrete objects. Many important discrete structures are built using sets, which 2.2 Set Operations M are collections of objects. Among the discrete structures built from sets are combinations, 2.3 Functions unordered collections of objects used extensively in counting; relations, sets of ordered pairs that represent relationships between objects; graphs, sets of vertices and edges that connect 2.4 Sequences and vertices; and finite state machines, used to model computing machines. These are some of the Summations topics we will study in later chapters. The concept of a function is extremely important in discrete mathematics. A function assigns to each element of a set exactly one element of a set. Functions play important roles throughout discrete mathematics. They are used to represent the computational complexity of algorithms, to study the size of sets, to count objects, and in a myriad of other ways. Useful structures such as sequences and strings are special types of functions. In this chapter, we will introduce the notion of a sequence, which represents ordered lists of elements. We will introduce some important types of sequences, and we will address the problem of identifying a pattern for the terms of a sequence from its first few terms. Using the notion of a sequence, we will define what it means for a set to be countable, namely, that we can list all the elements of the set in a sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Diagrammatic Inference System with Euler Circles ∗
    A Diagrammatic Inference System with Euler Circles ∗ Koji Mineshima, Mitsuhiro Okada, and Ryo Takemura Department of Philosophy, Keio University, Japan. fminesima,mitsu,[email protected] Abstract Proof-theory has traditionally been developed based on linguistic (symbolic) represen- tations of logical proofs. Recently, however, logical reasoning based on diagrammatic or graphical representations has been investigated by logicians. Euler diagrams were intro- duced in the 18th century by Euler [1768]. But it is quite recent (more precisely, in the 1990s) that logicians started to study them from a formal logical viewpoint. We propose a novel approach to the formalization of Euler diagrammatic reasoning, in which diagrams are defined not in terms of regions as in the standard approach, but in terms of topo- logical relations between diagrammatic objects. We formalize the unification rule, which plays a central role in Euler diagrammatic reasoning, in a style of natural deduction. We prove the soundness and completeness theorems with respect to a formal set-theoretical semantics. We also investigate structure of diagrammatic proofs and prove a normal form theorem. 1 Introduction Euler diagrams were introduced by Euler [3] to illustrate syllogistic reasoning. In Euler dia- grams, logical relations among the terms of a syllogism are simply represented by topological relations among circles. For example, the universal categorical statements of the forms All A are B and No A are B are represented by the inclusion and the exclusion relations between circles, respectively, as seen in Fig. 1. Given two Euler diagrams which represent the premises of a syllogism, the syllogistic inference can be naturally replaced by the task of manipulating the diagrams, in particular of unifying the diagrams and extracting information from them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taste of Set Theory for Philosophers
    Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research, Vol. XXVII, No. 2. A Special Issue on "Logic and Philosophy Today", 143-163, 2010. Reprinted in "Logic and Philosophy Today" (edited by A. Gupta ans J.v.Benthem), College Publications vol 29, 141-162, 2011. A taste of set theory for philosophers Jouko Va¨an¨ anen¨ ∗ Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Helsinki and Institute for Logic, Language and Computation University of Amsterdam November 17, 2010 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Elementary set theory 2 3 Cardinal and ordinal numbers 3 3.1 Equipollence . 4 3.2 Countable sets . 6 3.3 Ordinals . 7 3.4 Cardinals . 8 4 Axiomatic set theory 9 5 Axiom of Choice 12 6 Independence results 13 7 Some recent work 14 7.1 Descriptive Set Theory . 14 7.2 Non well-founded set theory . 14 7.3 Constructive set theory . 15 8 Historical Remarks and Further Reading 15 ∗Research partially supported by grant 40734 of the Academy of Finland and by the EUROCORES LogICCC LINT programme. I Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research, Vol. XXVII, No. 2. A Special Issue on "Logic and Philosophy Today", 143-163, 2010. Reprinted in "Logic and Philosophy Today" (edited by A. Gupta ans J.v.Benthem), College Publications vol 29, 141-162, 2011. 1 Introduction Originally set theory was a theory of infinity, an attempt to understand infinity in ex- act terms. Later it became a universal language for mathematics and an attempt to give a foundation for all of mathematics, and thereby to all sciences that are based on mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Logic and Set Theory
    Chapter 1 Logic and Set Theory To criticize mathematics for its abstraction is to miss the point entirely. Abstraction is what makes mathematics work. If you concentrate too closely on too limited an application of a mathematical idea, you rob the mathematician of his most important tools: analogy, generality, and simplicity. – Ian Stewart Does God play dice? The mathematics of chaos In mathematics, a proof is a demonstration that, assuming certain axioms, some statement is necessarily true. That is, a proof is a logical argument, not an empir- ical one. One must demonstrate that a proposition is true in all cases before it is considered a theorem of mathematics. An unproven proposition for which there is some sort of empirical evidence is known as a conjecture. Mathematical logic is the framework upon which rigorous proofs are built. It is the study of the principles and criteria of valid inference and demonstrations. Logicians have analyzed set theory in great details, formulating a collection of axioms that affords a broad enough and strong enough foundation to mathematical reasoning. The standard form of axiomatic set theory is denoted ZFC and it consists of the Zermelo-Fraenkel (ZF) axioms combined with the axiom of choice (C). Each of the axioms included in this theory expresses a property of sets that is widely accepted by mathematicians. It is unfortunately true that careless use of set theory can lead to contradictions. Avoiding such contradictions was one of the original motivations for the axiomatization of set theory. 1 2 CHAPTER 1. LOGIC AND SET THEORY A rigorous analysis of set theory belongs to the foundations of mathematics and mathematical logic.
    [Show full text]
  • Surviving Set Theory: a Pedagogical Game and Cooperative Learning Approach to Undergraduate Post-Tonal Music Theory
    Surviving Set Theory: A Pedagogical Game and Cooperative Learning Approach to Undergraduate Post-Tonal Music Theory DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Angela N. Ripley, M.M. Graduate Program in Music The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: David Clampitt, Advisor Anna Gawboy Johanna Devaney Copyright by Angela N. Ripley 2015 Abstract Undergraduate music students often experience a high learning curve when they first encounter pitch-class set theory, an analytical system very different from those they have studied previously. Students sometimes find the abstractions of integer notation and the mathematical orientation of set theory foreign or even frightening (Kleppinger 2010), and the dissonance of the atonal repertoire studied often engenders their resistance (Root 2010). Pedagogical games can help mitigate student resistance and trepidation. Table games like Bingo (Gillespie 2000) and Poker (Gingerich 1991) have been adapted to suit college-level classes in music theory. Familiar television shows provide another source of pedagogical games; for example, Berry (2008; 2015) adapts the show Survivor to frame a unit on theory fundamentals. However, none of these pedagogical games engage pitch- class set theory during a multi-week unit of study. In my dissertation, I adapt the show Survivor to frame a four-week unit on pitch- class set theory (introducing topics ranging from pitch-class sets to twelve-tone rows) during a sophomore-level theory course. As on the show, students of different achievement levels work together in small groups, or “tribes,” to complete worksheets called “challenges”; however, in an important modification to the structure of the show, no students are voted out of their tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Contention-Free Periodic Message Scheduler Medium Access Control in Wireless Sensor / Actuator Networks
    Contention-Free Periodic Message Scheduler Medium Access Control in Wireless Sensor / Actuator Networks Thomas W. Carley Moussa A. Ba Rajeev Barua David B. Stewart ECE Department Embedded Research ECE Department Embedded Research University of Maryland Solutions University of Maryland Solutions [email protected] mba@embedded- [email protected] dstewart@embedded- zone.com zone.com Abstract actuator network applications have timeliness constrains, both on activities on individual nodes, and across multiple This paper presents a time division multiple access nodes. This results in timeliness constraints on both tasks medium access control protocol for wireless sensor / running on nodes and messages exchanged by nodes. actuator networks implemented with a contention-free Medium access control (MAC) is one of the most message scheduler. A message scheduler is used to important, and most studied, protocol layers in wireless determine which message has access to the medium at sensor / actuator networks. Wireless sensor / actuator any time. A set of messages is contention-free if only one networks are often characterized by extreme constraints message is ready at a time. Otherwise, some other on size, cost, power, and timeliness. This imposes criterion such as priority must be used to resolve constraints on every aspect of the design of these contention. In this case the message scheduler at each networks, especially the protocol stack. Wireless node in the network must schedule all messages in order networks are inherently broadcast media; all nodes in the to resolve contention. If the schedule is contention-free network share one common communication medium. however, then each node only schedules the messages that Therefore, a method for resolving contention when interest it.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Dissertation Draft Revised Final.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School ICT AND STEM EDUCATION AT THE COLONIAL BORDER: A POSTCOLONIAL COMPUTING PERSPECTIVE OF INDIGENOUS CULTURAL INTEGRATION INTO ICT AND STEM OUTREACH IN BRITISH COLUMBIA A Dissertation in Information Sciences and Technology by Richard Canevez © 2020 Richard Canevez Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2020 ii The dissertation of Richard Canevez was reviewed and approved by the following: Carleen Maitland Associate Professor of Information Sciences and Technology Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Daniel Susser Assistant Professor of Information Sciences and Technology and Philosophy Lynette (Kvasny) Yarger Associate Professor of Information Sciences and Technology Craig Campbell Assistant Teaching Professor of Education (Lifelong Learning and Adult Education) Mary Beth Rosson Professor of Information Sciences and Technology Director of Graduate Programs iii ABSTRACT Information and communication technologies (ICTs) have achieved a global reach, particularly in social groups within the ‘Global North,’ such as those within the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada. It has produced the need for a computing workforce, and increasingly, diversity is becoming an integral aspect of that workforce. Today, educational outreach programs with ICT components that are extending education to Indigenous communities in BC are charting a new direction in crossing the cultural barrier in education by tailoring their curricula to distinct Indigenous cultures, commonly within broader science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) initiatives. These efforts require examination, as they integrate Indigenous cultural material and guidance into what has been a largely Euro-Western-centric domain of education. Postcolonial computing theory provides a lens through which this integration can be investigated, connecting technological development and education disciplines within the parallel goals of cross-cultural, cross-colonial humanitarian development.
    [Show full text]