Clinical Studies….?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clinical Studies….? Clinical research in the midst of an Ebola outbreak Peter Horby Brisbane, 1-2 June 2015 Acknowledgements Stephen Kennedy (PIRE, Liberia) Foday Sahr (DoD, Sierra Leone) Mohamed Samai (COMAHS, Sierra Leone) Jake Dunning, Trudie Lang, Jen Groves, Mandy Rojek, Gail Carson and many others at Oxford Annick Antierens and others at MSF Fiona Gannon and others at GOAL Tim Brooks (Public Health England) John Whitehead (Lancaster, Trial Statistician) Chimerix Inc. / Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Inc. The RAPIDE trial teams The ISARIC, PREPARE and The Global Health Network Teams in Oxford The MSF and MoH teams in country The Ebola Patients Sponsor: University of Oxford Funder: Wellcome Trust Background The therapies The trials The challenges Lessons learned & next steps 13th August 2014 “investigators have a moral duty to evaluate these interventions in the best possible clinical studies that can be conducted under the circumstances of the epidemic.” The therapies Promising candidates Product What is it? Evidence ZMapp Ebola antibody cocktail Solid protection in monkeys TKM-Ebola RNA inhibitor Solid protection in monkeys Brincidofovir Small molecule with Antiviral activity in broad antiviral activity cell lines Favipiravir RNA polymerase Solid protection in inhibitor mice. Antiviral in monkeys Convalescent Antibodies from Failed in monkeys plasma recovered patients Repurposed therapies Product – Primary Comment Azithromycin (Zithromax) Widely used in critically ill pts Sertraline (Zoloft) Large safety db – healthy pts Chloroquine Large safety db – healthy pts Amiodarone (Cordorone) Clinical data in Ebola pts Erlotinib / Sunitinib Combination rx with phase 3 data Product - Secondary Comment Cepharanthine “Anti-inflammatory” licensed in Japan Interferon products Systemic reactogenicity Toremifene (Fareston) Black box warning - hypokalemia 9 TKM-Ebola The Favipiravir trials Convalescent plasma ZMapp Brincidofovir Rapid Assessment of Potential RAPIDE Interventions & Drugs for Ebola RAPIDE Objective Rapidly assess and triage a number of potential Ebola treatments in Phase 2 studies. Survival Conclusion Outcome (a) 80% Very effective Maximize benefits (b) 67% Promising Justification for RCT (c) 50% Ineffective Minimize wasted effort RAPIDE trial design Cooper B et al. PLoS Med. 2015 Apr 14;12(4):e1001815. Probabilities of reaching each conclusion for the phase II trial of treatment Exact probabilities for Phase 2 with 140 cases p = true probability of surviving for 14 days p description Probability of reaching conclusion: (a) (b) (c) 0.800 very effective 0.908 0.092 0.000 0.667 promising 0.034 0.950 0.016 0.500 ineffective 0.000 0.100 0.900 Maximum sample size = 140 24 straight successes (a) 12 straight failures (c) Rapid Assessment of Potential RAPIDE Interventions & Drugs for Ebola Brincidofovir trial Scientific Title Open-label, non-randomised single arm trial to investigate the efficacy of Brincidofovir compared to historic controls or Ebolavirus Disease in an outbreak setting in West Africa Clinical Phase 2 Trial Design Open-label, non-randomised, single arm trial Trial Participants Patients with confirmed Ebolavirus disease attending the participating treatment centre Planned Sample Size Up to 140 adult participants, paediatric enrolment according to presentation over the same recruitment period Investigational Brincidofovir (BCV) Medicinal Product Formulation, Dose, Patients ≥50 kg: 200 mg initial dose, then 100 mg twice weekly Route of for 4 doses Administration Patients <50 kg: 4mg/kg initial dose, then 2 mg/kg twice weekly for 4 doses Treatment duration 2 weeks Follow up duration 30 days follow-up Objectives Outcome Measures Primary To evaluate the impact of Mortality at Day 14 BCV treatment on early mortality in EVD Secondary 1. To evaluate the impact of 1. BCV treatment of adults and a) Time to meeting EVD treatment children on: center discharge criteria. b) Mortality at Day 30 after first dose a) Time to recovery of study treatment b) Late mortality c) Day 4 viral load c) Viral load d) Presence and duration of d) EVD symptoms symptoms (Days 1-14) e) EVD antibody response e) Convalescent anti-Ebolavirus IgG titer (Day 30) 2. To assess the safety of BCV 2. Incidence of SARs and key adverse treatment of adults and events (Days 1-14) children Rapid Assessment of Potential RAPIDE Interventions & Drugs for Ebola TKM-Ebola-Guinea Trial Tekmira’s Lipid Nanoparticle Platform Components: Amino Lipid Structural Lipid PEG - Lipid Nucleic Acid 40-140 nm diameter Jeffs et al. Pharm. Res. 2005. siRNA Proof-of-Concept non-Human Primates Geisbert et al, Lancet 2010; 375: 1896-905 20 Ebolavirus Zaire Outbreak in Guinea, March 2014 Guinea Variant Is Divergent From Kikwit, Original Target of TKM-100802 siRNA + 99 Sierra Leone sequence entries Jun-Jul 2014 Phylogenetic analysis suggests single clade distinct from outbreaks in central Africa Baize et al, NEJM Apr 16 2014 Product details: TKM-130803 • siRNA cocktail adjusted to Guinea strain • Wet formulation • IV once daily infusion over two hours • Seven days treatment • 100 treatment courses Simple, pragmatic trials . Consecutive enrollment & analysis . Dead or alive on day 14 . Max 100-140 patients . What could possibly go wrong? ★ ★ ★ ★ Challenges to research: PEARLS POLITICAL ETHICAL ADMIN REGULATORY LOGISTICAL SOCIETAL PEARLS - Political PEARLS - Ethical so long as standard requirements for human research ethics are met, all scientifically recognized methodologies and study designs should be considered as ethically acceptable— whether they are placebo controlled randomized trials or trials that don’t involve randomization to choosing the trial design that will control groups. both answer the question at issue and also be ethically and practically acceptable to the community in Pregnancy / children which the research is to be conducted. PEARLS - Administrative Grant awarded DM system Protocol Drug Selected Contracts Ethics -- Oxford Ethics - Liberia Import license Export drug Final agreements First Patient 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan PEARLS - Regulatory This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers visit http://www.djreprints.com. http://www.wsj.com/articles/chimerix-scraps-testing-of-experimental-ebola-drug-in-liberia-1422739087 BUSINESS Chimerix Scraps Testing of Experimental Ebola Drug in Liberia Declining Ebola Infection Rat e Contributed to Company’s Decision By PETER LOFTUS Jan. 31, 2015 4:18 p .m. ET Chim er ix I nc. scr apped t est ing of it s exper im ent al ant ivir al in Ebola pat ient s in Liber ia, saying t he num ber of infect ions had dr opped in r ecent w eeks, and t hat only a handful of pat ient s had been enr olled in t he Liber ian s t udy. The abr upt r ever sal in Chimerix ’s plans could r aise questions about whet her t he declining number of Ebola infections in W est Afr ica could be a pr oblem for o t her exper im ent al dr ugs and vaccines cur r ent ly under g oing t est ing in t he r egion for safet y and efficacy. The Wor ld H ealt h Or ganizat ion said t his w eek t he incidence of t he deadly disease cont inues t o fall in t he t hr ee count r ies t hat w er e har dest hit last year —Guinea, Liber ia and Sier r a Leone. M or e t han 22,000 people had been infect ed wit h Ebola and m or e t han 8 ,800 had died as of Jan. 25, pr im ar ily in t he t hr ee W est African countries, accor ding t o WH O. Chim er ix, of Dur ham , N.C., said in a news r elease issued lat e Fr iday t hat aft er discussions wit h t he U.S. Food and Dr ug Adm inist r at ion, t he com pan y “ is ceasing further participation in all current and future clinical s tudies of brincidofovir ” for Ebola vir us disease. This includes a st udy in Liber ia sponsor ed b y t he U.K.’s Univer sit y of Oxfor d, which began in J anuar y. Pet er H or by, an Oxfor d r esear cher who w as helping t o r un t he st udy, said t he decision t o halt it “ ar ose fr om bilat er al discussions bet ween Chim er ix and t he FD A.” H e said he wasn’t awar e of any r easons for t he decision beyond declining case num ber s. An FDA r epr esent at ive couldn’t im m ediat ely be r eached. The com pany said t he num ber of new cases of conf ir m ed Ebola vir us disease in Liber ia “ has decr eased signif icant ly, wit h only a handful of pat ient s enr olled t o dat e” in t he PEARLS - Logistical Ebola, AIDS Manufactur ed by Western Pharmaceuticals, US D oD? | The Liber ian Obser ver 08/12/2014 09:31 E-EDITION LOGIN ADVERTISING ARCHIVES SEARCH Calling all citizen journalists: If it has happened, is happening or is about to happen in your community, let us know. Find our contact info at the bottom of this page. For the latest, follow us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Liberian-Observer- It is 9:30 am in Monrovia on Monday, December 08, 2014 Online/42279623238 HOME NEWS BUSINESS OPINION SPORTS COLUMNS LIB LIFE WEIRD NEWS OBITUARIES HOME / NEWS / SECURITY / EBOLA, AIDS MANUFACTURED BY WESTERN PHARMACEUTICALS, US DOD? Safari Power Saver Click to Start Flash Plug-in Weather Forecast | Weather Maps Liber ian Obser v er E-Edition Subscribe to our full PDF version for access to job vacancies, ads, requests for proposals, invitations to bid, legal notices, obituaries and more! Scientists allege deadly diseases such as Ebola and AIDS are bio weapons being tested on Africans.
Recommended publications
  • Eradicating Ebola: Lessons Learned and Medical Advancements Hearing
    ERADICATING EBOLA: LESSONS LEARNED AND MEDICAL ADVANCEMENTS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AFRICA, GLOBAL HEALTH, GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS, AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 4, 2019 Serial No. 116–44 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/, http://docs.house.gov, or http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–558PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York, Chairman BRAD SHERMAN, California MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas, Ranking GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York Member ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia STEVE CHABOT, Ohio THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida JOE WILSON, South Carolina KAREN BASS, California SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania WILLIAM KEATING, Massachusetts TED S. YOHO, Florida DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois AMI BERA, California LEE ZELDIN, New York JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas JIM SENSENBRENNER, Wisconsin DINA TITUS, Nevada ANN WAGNER, Missouri ADRIANO ESPAILLAT, New York BRIAN MAST, Florida TED LIEU, California FRANCIS ROONEY, Florida SUSAN WILD, Pennsylvania BRIAN FITZPATRICK, Pennsylvania DEAN PHILLIPS, Minnesota JOHN CURTIS, Utah ILHAN OMAR, Minnesota KEN BUCK, Colorado COLIN ALLRED, Texas RON WRIGHT, Texas ANDY LEVIN, Michigan GUY RESCHENTHALER, Pennsylvania ABIGAIL SPANBERGER, Virginia TIM BURCHETT, Tennessee CHRISSY HOULAHAN, Pennsylvania GREG PENCE, Indiana
    [Show full text]
  • To Ebola Reston
    WHO/HSE/EPR/2009.2 WHO experts consultation on Ebola Reston pathogenicity in humans Geneva, Switzerland 1 April 2009 EPIDEMIC AND PANDEMIC ALERT AND RESPONSE WHO experts consultation on Ebola Reston pathogenicity in humans Geneva, Switzerland 1 April 2009 © World Health Organization 2009 All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distin- guished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. This publication contains the collective views of an international group of experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the policies of the World Health Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • How Severe and Prevalent Are Ebola and Marburg Viruses?
    Nyakarahuka et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2016) 16:708 DOI 10.1186/s12879-016-2045-6 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access How severe and prevalent are Ebola and Marburg viruses? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the case fatality rates and seroprevalence Luke Nyakarahuka1,2,5* , Clovice Kankya2, Randi Krontveit3, Benjamin Mayer4, Frank N. Mwiine2, Julius Lutwama5 and Eystein Skjerve1 Abstract Background: Ebola and Marburg virus diseases are said to occur at a low prevalence, but are very severe diseases with high lethalities. The fatality rates reported in different outbreaks ranged from 24–100%. In addition, sero-surveys conducted have shown different seropositivity for both Ebola and Marburg viruses. We aimed to use a meta-analysis approach to estimate the case fatality and seroprevalence rates of these filoviruses, providing vital information for epidemic response and preparedness in countries affected by these diseases. Methods: Published literature was retrieved through a search of databases. Articles were included if they reported number of deaths, cases, and seropositivity. We further cross-referenced with ministries of health, WHO and CDC databases. The effect size was proportion represented by case fatality rate (CFR) and seroprevalence. Analysis was done using the metaprop command in STATA. Results: The weighted average CFR of Ebola virus disease was estimated to be 65.0% [95% CI (54.0–76.0%), I2 = 97.98%] whereas that of Marburg virus disease was 53.8% (26.5–80.0%, I2 = 88.6%). The overall seroprevalence of Ebola virus was 8.0% (5.0%–11.0%, I2 = 98.7%), whereas that for Marburg virus was 1.2% (0.5–2.0%, I2 = 94.8%).
    [Show full text]
  • Development of an Antibody Cocktail for Treatment of Sudan Virus Infection
    Development of an antibody cocktail for treatment of Sudan virus infection Andrew S. Herberta,b, Jeffery W. Froudea,1, Ramon A. Ortiza, Ana I. Kuehnea, Danielle E. Doroskya, Russell R. Bakkena, Samantha E. Zaka,b, Nicole M. Josleyna,b, Konstantin Musiychukc, R. Mark Jonesc, Brian Greenc, Stephen J. Streatfieldc, Anna Z. Wecd,2, Natasha Bohorovae, Ognian Bohorove, Do H. Kime, Michael H. Paulye, Jesus Velascoe, Kevin J. Whaleye, Spencer W. Stoniera,b,3, Zachary A. Bornholdte, Kartik Chandrand, Larry Zeitline, Darryl Sampeyf, Vidadi Yusibovc,4, and John M. Dyea,5 aVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD 21702; bThe Geneva Foundation, Tacoma, WA 98402; cFraunhofer USA Center for Molecular Biotechnology, Newark, DE 19711; dDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461; eMapp Biopharmaceutical, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121; and fBioFactura, Inc., Frederick, MD 21701 Edited by Y. Kawaoka, University of Wisconsin–Madison/University of Tokyo, Madison, WI, and approved December 30, 2019 (received for review August 28, 2019) Antibody-based therapies are a promising treatment option for antibody-based immunotherapies. Subsequently, several indepen- managing ebolavirus infections. Several Ebola virus (EBOV)-specific dent groups reported the postexposure efficacy of monoclonal and, more recently, pan-ebolavirus antibody cocktails have been antibody (mAb)-based immunotherapies against EVD in ma- described. Here, we report the development and assessment of a caques when administered as mixtures of two or more mAbs (14–17). Sudan virus (SUDV)-specific antibody cocktail. We produced a panel These landmark studies demonstrated that combination mAb- of SUDV glycoprotein (GP)-specific human chimeric monoclonal based immunotherapies are a viable treatment option for EVD antibodies (mAbs) using both plant and mammalian expression and spurred therapeutic antibody development for filoviruses.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Ebola
    Understanding Ebola With the arrival of Ebola in the United States, it's very easy to develop fears that the outbreak that has occurred in Africa will suddenly take shape in your state and local community. It's important to remember that unless you come in direct contact with someone who is infected with the disease, you and your family will remain safe. State and government agencies have been making preparations to address isolated cases of infection and stop the spread of the disease as soon as it has been positively identified. Every day, the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is monitoring developments, testing for suspected cases and safeguarding our lives with updates on events and the distribution of educational resources. Learning more about Ebola and understanding how it's contracted and spread will help you put aside irrational concerns and control any fears you might have about Ebola severely impacting your life. Use the resources below to help keep yourself calm and focused during this unfortunate time. Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever Ebola hemorrhagic fever (Ebola HF) is one of numerous Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers. It is a severe, often fatal disease in humans and nonhuman primates (such as monkeys, gorillas, and chimpanzees). Ebola HF is caused by infection with a virus of the family Filoviridae, genus Ebolavirus. When infection occurs, symptoms usually begin abruptly. The first Ebolavirus species was discovered in 1976 in what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo near the Ebola River. Since then, outbreaks have appeared sporadically. There are five identified subspecies of Ebolavirus.
    [Show full text]
  • Taï Forest Virus Does Not Cause Lethal Disease in Ferrets
    microorganisms Article Taï Forest Virus Does Not Cause Lethal Disease in Ferrets Zachary Schiffman 1,2,† , Feihu Yan 3,†, Shihua He 2, Kevin Tierney 2, Wenjun Zhu 2 , Karla Emeterio 1,2, Huajun Zhang 1, Logan Banadyga 2,* and Xiangguo Qiu 2 1 Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada; [email protected] (Z.S.); [email protected] (K.E.); [email protected] (H.Z.) 2 Special Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3R2, Canada; [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (K.T.); [email protected] (W.Z.); [email protected] (X.Q.) 3 Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130122, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally. Abstract: Filoviruses are zoonotic, negative-sense RNA viruses, most of which are capable of causing severe disease in humans and nonhuman primates, often with high case fatality rates. Among these viruses, those belonging to the Ebolavirus genus—particularly Ebola virus, Sudan virus, and Bundibugyo virus—represent some of the most pathogenic to humans. Taï Forest virus (TAFV) is thought to be among the least pathogenic ebolaviruses; however, only a single non-fatal case has been documented in humans, in 1994. With the recent success of the ferret as a lethal model for a number of ebolaviruses, we set out to evaluate its suitability as a model for TAFV. Our results demonstrate that, unlike other ebolaviruses, TAFV infection in ferrets does not result in lethal disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebolavirus an Animals
    Ebolavirus and Animals Our knowledge to date and how animal health can support the public health emergency Ebolavirus and Animals – Our knowledge to date and how animal health can support the public health emergency • 29 May 2018 Speakers • Lee Myers • Cyprien Felix Biaou Manager a.I. Emergency Management Livestock Development Officer, FAO Centre for Animal Health (EMC-AH) sub-regional Office for Central Africa Coordinator of FAO’s Ebola Incident (FAO-SFC) Coordination Group (ICG) • Claudia Pittiglio • Sophie von Dobschuetz Ecologist Global Surveillance coordinator (EPT-2) FAO Global Early Warning System (FAO- Emergency Prevention system for GLEWS) and Emerging Pandemic Threats transboundary Animal Diseases Programme Phase 2 (EPT-2) (EMPRES-AH) Ebolavirus and Animals – Our knowledge to date and how animal health can support the public health emergency • 29 May 2018 Webinar Content – Ebola and Animals • Presentation of FAO’s activities – Global level (Lee MYERS) – Regional and country levels (Cyprien BIAOU) • Susceptibility of animal species – Wildlife (Claudia PITTIGLIO) – Domestic (Sophie VON DOBSCHUETZ) • Availability of diagnostic tests for animal samples (Sophie VON DOBSCHUETZ) • What AH agencies and partners are doing (Sophie VON DOBSCHUETZ) Ebolavirus and Animals – Our knowledge to date and how animal health can support the public health emergency • 29 May 2018 3 Context of this webinar: <Phylogeny of the family Filoviridae ZEBOV Current outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) © Basicmedical Key Ebolavirus and Animals – Our knowledge to date and how animal health can support the public health emergency • 29 May 2018 FAO Ebola Incident Coordination Group (ICG) • In the spirit of One Health, FAO is supporting the efforts of the public health sector in response to the EVD outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebola Virus Disease October 2014 • $12.00 US
    SPECIAL DIGITAL ISSUE: Ebola Virus Disease October 2014 • $12.00 US EBOLA VIRUS DISEASE A Primer for Infection Preventionists Ebola Virus Disease: A Primer for Infection Preventionists By Kelly M. Pyrek ccording to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Ebola — previously known as AEbola hemorrhagic fever — is a rare and deadly disease caused by infection with one of the Ebola virus strains. Ebola can cause disease in humans and non- human primates. Ebola is caused by infection with a virus of the family Filoviridae, genus Ebolavirus. There Ebola, previously known are five identified Ebola virus species, four of which are known to cause disease in humans: Ebola virus as Ebola hemorrhagic (Zaire ebolavirus); Sudan virus (Sudan ebolavirus); fever, is a rare and Taï Forest virus (Taï Forest ebolavirus, formerly Côte d’Ivoire ebolavirus); and Bundibugyo virus (Bundibugyo deadly disease caused ebolavirus). The fifth, Reston virus (Reston ebolavirus), by infection with one of has caused disease in non-human primates, but not in humans. the Ebola virus strains. Ebola was first discovered in 1976 near the Ebola River in what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Since then, outbreaks have appeared sporadically in Africa. The natural reservoir host of Ebola virus remains unknown; however, on the basis of evidence and the nature of similar viruses, researchers believe that the virus is animal-borne and that bats are the most likely reservoir. Four of the five virus strains occur in an animal host native to Africa. INFECTION CONTROL TODAY Ebola Virus Disease www.infectioncontroltoday.com 3 The Outbreak Situation at Home and Abroad: An Update As of Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation Review(S)
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 761169Orig1s000 RISK ASSESSMENT and RISK MITIGATION REVIEW(S) Division of Risk Management (DRM) Office of Medication Error Prevention and Risk Management (OMEPRM) Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Application Type BLA Application Number 761169 PDUFA Goal Date October 25, 2020 OSE RCM # 2020-264 Reviewer Name(s) Elizabeth Everhart, MSN, RN, ACNP Team Leader Naomi Boston, PharmD Acting Deputy Division Doris Auth, PharmD Director Review Completion Date August 10, 2020; date entered into DARRTS, August 20, 2020 Subject Evaluation of Need for a REMS Established Name atoltivimab – odesivimab – maftivimab (REGN-EB3) Trade Name Inmazeb Name of Applicant Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Therapeutic Class Human IgG monoclonal antibody Formulation Solution for infusion Dosing Regimen 50 mg of each mAb/kg (3mL/kg) IV (b) (4) × 1 1 Reference ID: 4659652 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................3 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................3 2 Background .........................................................................................................................................................................3 2.1 Product Information..............................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • 761169Orig1s000
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 761169Orig1s000 OTHER REVIEW(S) LABEL AND LABELING REVIEW Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (DMEPA) Office of Medication Error Prevention and Risk Management (OMEPRM) Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) *** This document contains proprietary information that cannot be released to the public*** Date of This Review: October 7, 2020 Requesting Office or Division: Division of Antivirals (DAV) Application Type and Number: BLA 761169 Product Name, Dosage Form, Inmazeb (atoltivimab, maftivimab, and odesivimab-ebgn) and Strength: Injection 241.7 mg/241.7 mg/241.7 mg per 14.5 mL (16.67 mg/16.67 mg/16.67 mg per mL) Product Type: Multi-Ingredient Product Rx or OTC: Prescription (Rx) Applicant/Sponsor Name: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Regeneron) FDA Received Date: February 25, 2020 OSE RCM #: 2020-263 DMEPA Safety Evaluator: Valerie S. Vaughan, PharmD DMEPA Associate Director of Mishale Mistry, PharmD, MPH Nomenclature and Labeling: 1 1 REASON FOR REVIEW As part of the approval process for Inmazeb injection, 241.7 mg/241.7 mg/241.7 mg per 14.5 mL (16.67 mg/16.67 mg/16.67 mg per mL), the Division of Antivirals (DAV) requested that we review the proposed labels and labeling for areas that may lead to medication errors. 2 MATERIALS REVIEWED We considered the materials listed in Table 1 for this review. The Appendices provide the methods and results for each material reviewed. Table 1. Materials Considered for this
    [Show full text]
  • Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak in North Kivu and Ituri Provinces, Democratic Republic of the Congo – Second Update
    RAPID RISK ASSESSMENT Ebola virus disease outbreak in North Kivu and Ituri Provinces, Democratic Republic of the Congo – second update 21 December 2018 Main conclusions As of 16 December 2018, the Ministry of Health of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has reported 539 Ebola virus disease (EVD) cases, including 48 probable and 491 confirmed cases. This epidemic in the provinces of North Kivu and Ituri is the largest outbreak of EVD recorded in DRC and the second largest worldwide. A total of 315 deaths occurred during the reporting period. As of 16 December 2018, 52 healthcare workers (50 confirmed and two probable) have been reported among the confirmed cases, and of these 17 have died. As of 10 December 2018, the overall case fatality rate was 58%. Since mid-October, an average of around 30 new cases has been reported every week, with 14 health zones reporting confirmed cases in the past 21 days. This trend shows that the outbreak is continuing across geographically dispersed areas. Although the transmission intensity has decreased in Beni, the outbreak is continuing in Butembo city, and new clusters are emerging in the surrounding health zones. A geographical extension of the outbreak (within the country and to neighbouring countries) cannot be excluded as it is unlikely that it will be controlled in the near future. Despite significant achievements, the implementation of response measures remains problematic because of the prolonged humanitarian crisis in North Kivu province, the unstable security situation arising from a complex armed conflict and the mistrust of affected communities in response activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacologic Treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): a Review
    Clinical Review & Education JAMA | Review Pharmacologic Treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) A Review James M. Sanders, PhD, PharmD; Marguerite L. Monogue, PharmD; Tomasz Z. Jodlowski, PharmD; James B. Cutrell, MD Viewpoint pages 1769, and IMPORTANCE The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the novel 1767 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) presents an unprecedented Related article page 1839 challenge to identify effective drugs for prevention and treatment. Given the rapid pace of CME Quiz at scientific discovery and clinical data generated by the large number of people rapidly infected jamacmelookup.com by SARS-CoV-2, clinicians need accurate evidence regarding effective medical treatments for this infection. OBSERVATIONS No proven effective therapies for this virus currently exist. The rapidly Author Affiliations: Department of expanding knowledge regarding SARS-CoV-2 virology provides a significant number of Pharmacy, University of Texas potential drug targets. The most promising therapy is remdesivir. Remdesivir has potent in Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2, but it is not US Food and Drug Administration approved (Sanders, Monogue); Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic and currently is being tested in ongoing randomized trials. Oseltamivir has not been shown to Medicine, Department of Medicine, have efficacy, and corticosteroids are currently not recommended. Current clinical evidence University of Texas Southwestern does not support stopping angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor Medical Center, Dallas (Sanders, Monogue, Cutrell); Pharmacy Service, blockers in patients with COVID-19. VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas (Jodlowski). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The COVID-19 pandemic represents the greatest global public health crisis of this generation and, potentially, since the pandemic Corresponding Author: James B.
    [Show full text]