DOCSLIB.ORG

Map and Data for Quaternary Faults and Folds in Oregon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Map and Data for Quaternary Faults and Folds in Oregon Map and data for Quaternary faults and folds in Oregon By Stephen F. Personius, Richard L. Dart, Lee-Ann Bradley, and Kathleen M. Haller This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Open-File Report 03-095 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 Strategy for Map and Database ................................................................................ 2 Synopsis of Quaternary Faulting and Folding in Oregon....................................................... 4 Sources of Data............................................................................................................................ 4 Overview of Quaternary Tectonic Setting ............................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................. 6 List of Contributing Individuals ............................................................................... 7 Definition of Database Terms and Glossary .................................................................... 8 Fault and Fold Database ......................................................................................21 580, Faults near The Dalles....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................22 708, Unnamed faults near Jaussaud Creek.............................................................................................................................................................................................25 709, South Grande Ronde Valley faults....................................................................................................................................................................................................27 710, Ukiah Valley faults............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................30 711, Sumpter Valley faults......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................33 712, Unnamed East Baker Valley faults...................................................................................................................................................................................................35 713, Powder River Peninsula fault zone...................................................................................................................................................................................................37 714, Helvetia fault............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................41 715, Beaverton fault zone.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................44 716, Canby-Molalla fault..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................48 717, Newberg fault...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................52 718, Gales Creek fault zone...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................55 719, Salem-Eola Hills homocline....................................................................................................................................................................................................................59 781, Cascadia subduction zone...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................62 782, Blanco transform fault zone.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................76 784, Cascadia fold and thrust belt....................................................................................................................................................................................................................80 785, Unnamed offshore faults..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................83 786, Stonewall anticline.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................86 787, Bald Mountain-Big Lagoon fault zone.........................................................................................................................................................................................89 788, Fault “J”.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................92 789, Nehalem Bank fault...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................95 790, Fault “H”.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................98 791, Fault “G”...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................101 793, Thompson Ridge fault................................................................................................................................................................................................................................104 794, Coos Basin fault................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................107 795, Heceta Bank structure.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................110 796, Heceta South fault...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................113 797, Alvin Canyon fault.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................116 i 798, Daisy Bank fault ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................119 799, Wecoma fault.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................122 801, Wallowa fault.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................125 802, West Grande Ronde Valley fault
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bilek Earth and Environmental Sciences Dept
    Susan L. Bilek Earth and Environmental Sciences Dept. New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Email: [email protected] Webpage: https://nmt.edu/academics/ees/faculty/sbilek.php Professional Preparation: B.S., with honors, Geosciences, minor in Economics, Penn State University, May 1996 M.S., Earth Sciences/Geophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, June 1998 M.S. Thesis title: Lower mantle heterogeneity beneath Eurasia imaged by parametric migration of shear waves Ph.D. Earth Sciences/Geophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, June 2001 Ph.D. Dissertation title: Multi-scale examination of seismogenic zone processes in circum- Pacific subduction zones Turner Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, 2001-2003 Appointments: Professor, Earth and Environmental Science Dept., New Mexico Tech, 2014 – present Associate Professor, Earth and Environmental Sciences Dept., New Mexico Tech, 2008 – 2014 Assistant Professor, Earth and Environmental Sciences Dept., New Mexico Tech, 2003 – 2008 Selected Recent Synergistic Activities: National/International: Board of Directors, Seismological Society of America, 2020-2022 Associate Editor, Geophysical Research Letters, 2020-present Editorial Board, Tectonophysics, 2016-present Associate Guest Editor, Subduction Top to Bottom 2, special issue of Geospheres, 2016-present PI of IRIS PASSCAL Instrument Center, Oct 2013-present IRIS Board of Directors, 2010-2012, Board secretary 2012 Reviewer: NSF, NNSA, Science, Science Advances, Nature,
    [Show full text]
  • What's Shaking
    ISSUE 03 - February 2016 WHAT’S SHAKING newsletter of the THE NEVADA SEISMOLOGICAL LABORATORY Earthquake Update NEVADA Carson RENO City Maps of earthquakes located by the Nevada Seismo- logical Laboratory (NSL) between 1/1/16 and 1/31/16, within the NSL network (right). Truckee Meadows region (above), Hawthorne, Nevada area (bottom left) and the area surrounding Las Vegas, Nevada (bottom right). HAWTHORNE Earthquakes located by the NSL (1/1/16-1/31/16) ML Quantity 4.0+ 1 3.0-3.9 2 2.0-2.9 67 Nevada 1.0-1.9 478 National ML < 1.0 809 Security Site Total 1357 eismicity during January included a small sequence near Haw- Sthorne, Nevada (above), and a notable sequence near Enter- LAS VEGAS prise, Utah (right). The largest of these Hawthorne events measured M3.2, and several events greater than M2.0 were also recorded. An event (M4.3) that occurred near Enterprise, Utah shook several eastern Nevada communities on January 15, 2016. The Sheldon Sequence also continues to be active in northwestern Nevada. Maps compiled by D. Molisee (2016) www.graphicdiffer.comwww.seismo.unr.edu @NVSeismoLab1 DEVELOPMENTS NSL Graduate Students Leverage Funding from the National Science Foundation unding for Steve Angster and will focus on the Agai-Pai, Indian FIan Pierce has come from Head, Gumdrop, Benton Springs, a National Science Foundation and Petrified fault systems, while grant (Steve Wesnousky, lead PI) Ian will study the Tahoe, Carson, focused on the deformation pat- Antelope Valley, Smith Valley, Ma- tern and kinematics of the Walker son Valley, and Walker Lake fault Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Annex Earthquake
    Hazard Annex Earthquake Northeast Oregon Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Page P-1 ISSN 0270-952X STATE OF OREGON OPEN-FILE REPORT 03-02 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES Map of Selected Earthquakes for Oregon, VICKI S. McCONNELL, ACTING STATE GEOLOGIST Map of Selected Earthquakes for Oregon, 1841 through 2002 1841 through 2002 By Clark A. Niewendorp and Mark E. Neuhaus 2003 Astoria WASHINGTON IDAHO COLUMBIA 46° CLATSOP Saint Helens Pendleton Hood River WASHINGTON WALLOWA The Dalles UMATILLA TILLAMOOK Portland Hillsboro MULTNOMAH Moro HOOD GILLIAM Enterprise Tillamook RIVER Oregon City Heppner La Grande YAMHILL SHERMAN MORROW UNION McMinnville CLACKAMAS Condon WASCO Fossil 45° Dallas Salem MARION POLK WHEELER Baker Newport Albany BAKER JEFFERSON Madras LINCOLN Corvallis GRANT LINN BENTON Canyon City Prineville CROOK Eugene Bend Vale 44° LANE DESCHUTES Burns Magnitude 7 and higher HARNEY Coquille Roseburg Magnitude 6.0 - 6.9 COOS DOUGLAS Magnitude 5.0 - 5.9 MALHEUR Magnitude 4.0 - 4.9 LAKE Magnitude 3.0 - 3.9 Magnitude 1.0 - 2.9 KLAMATH Magnitude 0.0 - 0.9 Fault - Holocene JACKSON CURRY Fault - Late quaternary Grants Pass Gold Beach State line Medford JOSEPHINE County line Klamath Falls County seat Lakeview IDAHO NEVADA 42° CALIFORNIA NEVADA 126° 125° 124° 123° 122° 121° 120° 119° 118° 117° 116° WHAT DOES THE MAP SHOW? faults are defined as those that moved in the last 780,000 years. Faults active in the last 1993, Scotts Mills (near Silverton and Woodburn in Marion County, Oregon) earthquake Dougherty, M.L., and Trehu, A.M., 2002, Neogene deformation of the Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Alteration of a Major Neogene River Drainage of the Basin and Range
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2016 TECTONIC ALTERATION OF A MAJOR NEOGENE RIVER DRAINAGE OF THE BASIN AND RANGE Stuart D. Parker Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Tectonics and Structure Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Parker, Stuart D., "TECTONIC ALTERATION OF A MAJOR NEOGENE RIVER DRAINAGE OF THE BASIN AND RANGE" (2016). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 10637. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10637 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TECTONIC ALTERATION OF A MAJOR NEOGENE RIVER DRAINAGE OF THE BASIN AND RANGE By STUART DOUGLAS PARKER Bachelor of Science, University of North Carolina-Asheville, Asheville, North Carolina, 2014 Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology The University of Montana Missoula, MT May, 2016 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School James W. Sears, Committee Chair Department of Geosciences Rebecca Bendick Department of Geosciences Marc S. Hendrix Department of Geosciences Andrew Ware Department of Physics and Astronomy Parker, Stuart, M. S., May, 2016 Geology Tectonic alteration of a major Neogene river drainage of the Basin and Range Chairperson: James W.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic History of Siletzia, a Large Igneous Province in the Oregon And
    Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot Wells, R., Bukry, D., Friedman, R., Pyle, D., Duncan, R., Haeussler, P., & Wooden, J. (2014). Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot. Geosphere, 10 (4), 692-719. doi:10.1130/GES01018.1 10.1130/GES01018.1 Geological Society of America Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Downloaded from geosphere.gsapubs.org on September 10, 2014 Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot Ray Wells1, David Bukry1, Richard Friedman2, Doug Pyle3, Robert Duncan4, Peter Haeussler5, and Joe Wooden6 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefi eld Road, Menlo Park, California 94025-3561, USA 2Pacifi c Centre for Isotopic and Geochemical Research, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, 6339 Stores Road, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1680 East West Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA 4College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 CEOAS Administration Building, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5503, USA 5U.S. Geological Survey, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4626, USA 6School of Earth Sciences, Stanford University, 397 Panama Mall Mitchell Building 101, Stanford, California 94305-2210, USA ABSTRACT frames, the Yellowstone hotspot (YHS) is on southern Vancouver Island (Canada) to Rose- or near an inferred northeast-striking Kula- burg, Oregon (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of the Columbia River Flood Basalt Province: Plume Versus Nonplume Models
    The Origin of the Columbia River Flood Basalt Province: Plume versus Nonplume Models Peter R. Hooper1, Victor E. Camp2, Stephen P. Reidel3 and Martin E. Ross4 1 Dept of Geology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164 and Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, U.K. 2 Dept of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182 3 Washington State University Tri-Cities, Richland, Washington 99352 4 Dept of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Av., Boston, MA 02115 ABSTRACT As a contribution to the plume-nonplume debate we review the tectonic setting in which huge volumes of monotonous tholeiite of the Columbia River flood basalt province of the Pacific Northwest, USA, were erupted. We record the time-scale and the locations of these eruptions, estimates of individual eruption volumes, and discuss the mechanisms of sheet- flow emplacement, all of which bear on the ultimate origin of the province. An exceptionally large chemical and isotopic data base is used to identify the various mantle sources of the basalt and their subsequent evolution in large lower crustal magma chambers. We conclude by discussing the available data in light of the various deep mantle plume and shallow mantle models recently advocated for the origin of this flood basalt province and we argue that the mantle plume model best explains such an exceptionally large volume of tholeiitic basalt erupted over an unusually short period and within such a restricted area. 1 INTRODUCTION Advocates of mantle plumes have long considered continental flood basalt provinces to be one of the most obvious expressions of plume activity (Campbell and Griffiths, 1990; Richards et al., 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Cenozoic Thermal, Mechanical and Tectonic Evolution of the Rio Grande Rift
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 91, NO. B6, PAGES 6263-6276, MAY 10, 1986 Cenozoic Thermal, Mechanical and Tectonic Evolution of the Rio Grande Rift PAUL MORGAN1 Departmentof Geosciences,Purdue University,West Lafayette, Indiana WILLIAM R. SEAGER Departmentof Earth Sciences,New Mexico State University,Las Cruces MATTHEW P. GOLOMBEK Jet PropulsionLaboratory, CaliforniaInstitute of Technology,Pasadena Careful documentationof the Cenozoicgeologic history of the Rio Grande rift in New Mexico reveals a complexsequence of events.At least two phasesof extensionhave been identified.An early phase of extensionbegan in the mid-Oligocene(about 30 Ma) and may have continuedto the early Miocene (about 18 Ma). This phaseof extensionwas characterizedby local high-strainextension events (locally, 50-100%,regionally, 30-50%), low-anglefaulting, and the developmentof broad, relativelyshallow basins, all indicatingan approximatelyNE-SW •-25ø extensiondirection, consistent with the regionalstress field at that time.Extension events were not synchronousduring early phase extension and were often temporally and spatiallyassociated with major magmatism.A late phaseof extensionoccurred primarily in the late Miocene(10-5 Ma) with minor extensioncontinuing to the present.It was characterizedby apparently synchronous,high-angle faulting givinglarge verticalstrains with relativelyminor lateral strain (5-20%) whichproduced the moderuRio Granderift morphology.Extension direction was approximatelyE-W, consistentwith the contemporaryregional stress field. Late phasegraben or half-grabenbasins cut and often obscureearly phasebroad basins.Early phase extensionalstyle and basin formation indicate a ductilelithosphere, and this extensionoccurred during the climax of Paleogenemagmatic activity in this zone.Late phaseextensional style indicates a more brittle lithosphere,and this extensionfollowed a middle Miocenelull in volcanism.Regional uplift of about1 km appearsto haveaccompanied late phase extension, andrelatively minor volcanism has continued to thepresent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic Winnemucca to the Sea Highway “Gateway to the Pacific Northwest”
    Feb 2004 WINNEMUCCA to the SEA Highway The Historic Winnemucca to the Sea Highway “Gateway to the Pacific Northwest” John Ryczkowski The Winnemucca to the Sea highway was developed to establish a continu- ous, improved all-weather highway from US-40 (I-80) at Winnemucca, Nevada through Medford, Oregon and on to the Pacific coast at Crescent City, California. In the mid 1950’s there was no direct route west from Northern Nevada across South- ern Oregon and into California’s Redwood Empire. Community leaders from points along this proposed link formed the Winnemucca to the Sea Highway Association. The association worked with state and local governments to fund the design, con- struction and upgrade of the paved roadway for this east to west link across three states. The association had envisioned one highway number 140 applied to the complete route, as the parent major US highway was coast-to-coast US-40, the Victory Highway. Nevada and Oregon used state route 140 for their respective sections of the Winnemucca to the Sea Highway. But the renumbering or cosigning of federal highways was an obstacle that the Winnemucca to the Sea Association never did overcome, thus the hope of a continuous 140 designation for this link was never realized. Currently the traveler will follow seven different highway numbers from Winnemucca to Crescent City, they are US-95, state route-140, US-395, state Association brochure circa 1960’s route-62, Interstate-5, US-199 and US-101. Winnemucca, named after a local Paiute chief, has always been a crossroads town.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Regarding the Status of Open File Report Entitled, "Basin & Range-Age Reactivation of Rocky Mountain Structures
    # I 2 BUREAU OF ECONOiC GEOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN W'M OCKET N0TROL lSt To78713-750-(512)471-1534or471-7721(jZE *87 JIN -9 A1O:26 June 1, 1987 WM RecorgFile WM Project / /WI Docket No. 13 Dr. Theodore J. Taylor Salt Repository Project Office )rLPDRt adI9 n _ __ ta_ . U. 3* Uepdriinent UT Energy Dii b.iO 110 North 25 Mile Avenue _ _______- Hereford, TX 79045 Reference: Contract No. DE-AC97-83WM466t M __ ______ Dear Dr. Taylor: Per a request from Susan Heston to Chris Lewis, the status of the open-file report entitled *Basin and Range-Age Reactiviation of Rocky Mountain Structures in the Texas Panhandle, (OF-WTWI-1986-3),m by R. Budnik, is as follows. Dr. Budnik left the Bureau in August, 1986. The manuscript was revised by Dr. Budnik to reflect comments from GSA reviewers and resubmitted to the Journal before DOE comments were received at the Bureau. The article was published in the February, 1987 issue of Geology. Please note the title of the article was changed, it is now entitled nLate Miocene Reactivation of Ancestral Rocky Mountain Structures in the Texas Panhandle: A Response to Basin and Range Extension." Three copies of the reprinted article are enclosed. Also, the above referenced article supersedes OF-WTWI-1986-3. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Asoc iat cto Associate Director DCR:CL:cl Enclosures cc: P. Archer (BPMD) S. Heston (SRPO) F. Brown C. Lewis T. Clareson (BPMD/GRC) J. Raney S.
    [Show full text]
  • Article (PDF, 237
    Workshop White Papers Sci. Dril., 18, 19–33, 2014 www.sci-dril.net/18/19/2014/ doi:10.5194/sd-18-19-2014 © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Drilling to investigate processes in active tectonics and magmatism J. Shervais1, J. Evans1, V. Toy2, J. Kirkpatrick3, A. Clarke4, and J. Eichelberger5 1Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322, USA 2University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand 3Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, USA 4Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA 5University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA Correspondence to: J. Shervais ([email protected]) Received: 7 January 2014 – Revised: 5 May 2014 – Accepted: 19 May 2014 – Published: 22 December 2014 Abstract. Coordinated drilling efforts are an important method to investigate active tectonics and magmatic processes related to faults and volcanoes. The US National Science Foundation (NSF) recently sponsored a series of workshops to define the nature of future continental drilling efforts. As part of this series, we convened a workshop to explore how continental scientific drilling can be used to better understand active tectonic and magmatic processes. The workshop, held in Park City, Utah, in May 2013, was attended by 41 investigators from seven countries. Participants were asked to define compelling scientific justifications for examining problems that can be addressed by coordinated programs of continental scientific drilling and related site investigations. They were also asked to evaluate a wide range of proposed drilling projects, based on white papers submitted prior to the workshop. Participants working on faults and fault zone processes highlighted two overarching topics with exciting po- tential for future scientific drilling research: (1) the seismic cycle and (2) the mechanics and architecture of fault zones.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plate Boundary Observatory
    The Plate Boundary Observatory Results of the First Workshop on Geological Research Held at Pasadena, California May 22-25, 2001 Submitted by PBO Geology Committee Douglas Burbank Ken Hudnut (PBO Steering Committee) Rick Ryerson Charles Rubin PBO Geology White Paper/Page 1 David Schwartz (Chair) Brian Wernicke (PBO Steering Committee) Steve Wesnousky Introduction The diffuse plate boundary zone of the western US and Alaska consists of hundreds of active tectonic elements that collectively accommodate large-scale relative motions between the North American, Pacific and Juan de Fuca plates (Figure 1). The major plate-bounding structures include the San Andreas transform and the Alaskan and Cascadia subduction zones, which accommodate most of the relative plate motion. Each of these features is a system of faults, each of which either fails in repeated large earthquakes or creeps aseismically. In addition to these fault systems, areally extensive structural domains within the North American plate, such as the Basin and Range province, Rio Grande rift, Rocky Mountains and interior Alaska accommodate up to 30% of the relative plate motion (Figure 1). PBO Geology White Paper/Page 2 Figure 1. Tectonic setting of the Pacific-Juan de Fuca-North America plate boundary system, showing major fault systems and locations of proposed geodetic instrumentation. Courtesy of PBO Steering committee. The life-cycle of an individual fault zone lasts on the order of 1 to 10 Myr, and the repeat times of major earthquakes (durations of the seismic cycle) are on the order of hundreds to thousands of years or more. Hence any attempt to understand tectonic systems must include observations on these time scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Cascadia Low Frequency Earthquakes at the Base of an Overpressured Subduction Shear Zone ✉ Andrew J
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17609-3 OPEN Cascadia low frequency earthquakes at the base of an overpressured subduction shear zone ✉ Andrew J. Calvert 1 , Michael G. Bostock 2, Geneviève Savard 3 & Martyn J. Unsworth4 In subduction zones, landward dipping regions of low shear wave velocity and elevated Poisson’s ratio, which can extend to at least 120 km depth, are interpreted to be all or part of the subducting igneous oceanic crust. This crust is considered to be overpressured, because fl 1234567890():,; uids within it are trapped beneath an impermeable seal along the overlying inter-plate boundary. Here we show that during slow slip on the plate boundary beneath southern Vancouver Island, low frequency earthquakes occur immediately below both the landward dipping region of high Poisson’s ratio and a 6–10 km thick shear zone revealed by seismic reflections. The plate boundary here either corresponds to the low frequency earthquakes or to the anomalous elastic properties in the lower 3–5 km of the shear zone immediately above them. This zone of high Poisson’s ratio, which approximately coincides with an electrically conductive layer, can be explained by slab-derived fluids trapped at near-lithostatic pore pressures. 1 Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. 2 Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, 2207 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. 3 Department of Geosciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada. 4 Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.
    [Show full text]