DOCSLIB.ORG

The Avon Native Vegetation Map Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Avon Native Vegetation Map Project The Avon Native Vegetation Map Project Department of Environment and Conservation The Wheatbelt NRM June, 2011 The Avon Native Vegetation Map Project , June 2011 [The map layer and vegetation attribute outputs from this project can be viewed in the DEC NatureMap website .] ANVMP contributors were: Ben Bayliss - Source map interpretation, spatial data capture (GIS), NVIS vegetation attribute interpretation; Brett Glossop - Database development and NVIS data structure interpretation for the ANVMP; Paul Gioia - Naturemap website applications; Jane Hogben - Source map digitisation, GIS; Ann Rick – reinterpretation of Lake Campion vegetation mapping to NVIS criteria. Jeff Richardson - Avon Terrestrial Baseline ND 001 program Coordinating Ecologist. Tim Gamblin - Avon Terrestrial Baseline ND 001 Technical Officer. USE OF THIS REPORT Information used in this report may be copied or reproduced for study, research or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of acknowledgement of the source. DISCLAIMER In undertaking this work, the authors have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information used. Any information provided in the reports and maps made available is presented in good faith and the authors and participating bodies take no responsibility for how this information is used subsequently by others and accept no liability whatsoever for a third party’s use of or reliance upon these reports, maps, or any data or information accessed via related websites. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................2 PROJECT SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................2 Project Area ........................................................................................................................................3 PROJECT OUTPUTS ........................................................................................................................................3 PROJECT DATA SCOPING ................................................................................................................................3 Data Sources .......................................................................................................................................3 Data Variability...................................................................................................................................4 PROJECT METHODS .......................................................................................................................................6 Spatial Data Incorporation..................................................................................................................7 Vegetation Data Attribution ...............................................................................................................9 Taxon nomenclature and currency ...................................................................................................12 Databasing........................................................................................................................................12 REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................................................13 AVON NATIVE VEGETATION MAP PROJECT SOURCE DOCUMENTS ........................................................................14 APPENDIX 1: THE VEGETATION MAPPING PROCESS ...........................................................................................17 APPENDIX 2: VEGETATION ATTRIBUTES AND MAP UNIT CORRELATION .................................................................18 Attribution example: map 286_089..................................................................................................18 Mosaics and Multiattribution ...........................................................................................................22 APPENDIX 3: NVIS, SUMMARY OF GENERAL CONCEPTS AND DESCRIPTION CODING ................................................24 The NVIS Hierarchy: ..........................................................................................................................24 NVIS Description Codes .....................................................................................................................28 NVIS Tables: ......................................................................................................................................30 APPENDIX 4: VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION ......................................................................................................33 Structural Categories ........................................................................................................................34 References:........................................................................................................................................39 APPENDIX 5: DOMINANCE ............................................................................................................................40 Stratum .............................................................................................................................................40 APPENDIX 6: DATA STRUCTURE ....................................................................................................................44 Polygon multiattributes and web-based applications (Naturemap).................................................44 APPENDIX 7: NVIS ATTRIBUTE LIST ................................................................................................................47 APPENDIX 8: COMPARISON OF MUIR AND NVIS CLASSIFICATIONS ....................................................................177 Acknowledgements The Avon Native Vegetation Map Project was an initiative of the ND001 Avon Baselining program carried out under the Science Applications Program, Science Division within the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) and funded by the Wheatbelt NRM (formerly Avon Catchment Council). The following people are acknowledged for their valuable support: Judith Harvey, Research Scientist, Woodland Benchmarking Project, Science Applications Program; Greg Keighery Senior Principal Research Scientist, Science Division, DEC; Rebecca Palumbo Program Manager, Biodiversity, Wheatbelt NRM Inc. Steve Rowlands, Shane French and colleagues, Geographic Information Services, DEC. Brett Beecham, Regional Ecologist, Wheatbelt Region, DEC. WWF and Greening Australia, WA are gratefully acknowledged for their valuable input and support for the ANVMP project as well as contribution to project workshops. Also there were many others within and outside DEC whose time, knowledge, comments and feedback have been greatly appreciated. Introduction The Baselining Project is one of the natural diversity projects funded largely by the federal government through the Wheatbelt Natural Resource Management, NRM (formerly Avon Catchment Council, ACC). The Project’s primary purpose is to collate the biodiversity data and interpret these data to support other projects in the Wheatbelt NRM biodiversity theme. A preliminary role of the Baselining project was to identify key knowledge and operational gaps in natural diversity conservation within the Wheatbelt NRM region. One of these key knowledge gaps concerned the lack of appropriately scaled native vegetation mapping available for supporting natural diversity conservation across the Wheatbelt NRM region, (Richardson and Gamblin, 2009). Beard’s 1:250,000 Vegetation Associations and Beards and Hopkins 1:100,000 System Association mapping has been the main source of regional vegetation map coverage available for WA wheatbelt natural resource management. At such scales the vegetation associations mapped are too broad to account for the fine scale variations in vegetation (Harvey et al 2012). It was highlighted by Richardson and Gamblin (2009), that whilst invaluable as a synopsis of pre-European extent, Beard’s coverage was too coarse for appropriately informing the kinds of issues encountered at the scale of existing vegetation remnants. This deficiency of appropriately scaled map information was also identified as a constraint to vegetation management in the Northern Agricultural NRM Region (DEC, 2008). The existence of many separate and largely unpublished but potentially finer-scaled vegetation map documents related to the Avon NRM region raised the possibility of developing a combined resource that could help resolve this vegetation knowledge gap. Project Scope To be useful, any source maps needed to be integrated with a standardised set of vegetation attributes in a framework that allowed the data to be easily accessed, viewed, queried spatially as well as stored and managed as a coherent entity. In other words what was required was: o A single georeferenced spatial layer i.e. in a Geographic Information System (GIS)dataset o A set of corresponding standardised vegetation attributes. o A basis for querying data as a set of equivalent vegetation attributes. The currency, methods and scale of source mapping available for the Avon region varied considerably. The earliest sources represented a series of extensive wheatbelt surveys
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 a Survey of the Flora of Remnants Within the Waddy
    1 A SURVEY OF THE FLORA OF REMNANTS WITHIN THE WADDY FOREST LAND CONSERVATION DISTRICT Stephen Davies and Phil Ladd for the Waddy Forest Land Conservation District Committee March 2000 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 METHODS 3 RESULTS 4 DISCUSSION 56 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 59 REFERENCES 60 Appendix 1 - Composite plant list 60 Appendix 2 - Plants found outside the sample sites 67 Appendix 3 - Composite bird list 67 3 INTRODUCTION The Waddy Forest Land Conservation District is about 41,000 hectares and contains 23 substantial land holdings. In 1999 the District received a grant from the National Heritage Trust to survey the flora of its remnant vegetation. Much of this is on private property and the District Committee selected thirty three plots of remnant bushland on private farms to be included in flora survey. The present report is based on visits to these thirty three remnants that lie on 14 of the 23 farms in the district. The surveys are intended to provide information about the biodiversity of the various remnants with the aim of establishing the priority for preservation, by fencing, of the remnants and to determine the value of linking some of them by the planting of corridors of vegetation. At each site the local landholder(s) joined the survey and provided invaluable background information about the history of the remnants. The vegetation of this part of the northern wheatbelt is known to be very diverse. The Marchagee Nature Reserve, lying north west of the District, was surveyed between 1975 and 1977 (Dell et al. 1979). The area was covered by Beard in his vegetation mapping project (Beard 1976), and part of the south of the District was covered in a report on Koobabbie Farm in 1990 (Davies 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Rangelands, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices, Glossary
    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • For Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Manuscript Draft
    Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: MPE-15-437R1 Title: Integration of complete chloroplast genome sequences with small amplicon datasets improves phylogenetic resolution in Acacia Article Type: Research Paper Keywords: integrative systematics; whole chloroplast genome; Acacia; ExaBayes; RAxML Corresponding Author: Ms. Anna Williams, Corresponding Author's Institution: Kings Park and Botanic Garden First Author: Anna Williams Order of Authors: Anna Williams; Joseph T Miller; Ian Small; Paul G Nevill; Laura M Boykin Abstract: Combining whole genome data with previously obtained amplicon sequences has the potential to increase the resolution of phylogenetic analyses, particularly at low taxonomic levels or where recent divergence, rapid speciation or slow genome evolution has resulted in limited sequence variation. However, the integration of these types of data for large scale phylogenetic studies has rarely been investigated. Here we conduct a phylogenetic analysis of the whole chloroplast genome and two nuclear ribosomal loci for 65 Acacia species from across the most recent Acacia phylogeny. We then combine this data with previously generated amplicon sequences (four chloroplast loci and two nuclear ribosomal loci) for 508 Acacia species. We use several phylogenetic methods, including maximum likelihood bootstrapping (with and without constraint) and ExaBayes, in order to determine the success of combining a dataset of 4,000 bp with one of 189,000 bp. The results of our study indicate that the inclusion of whole genome data gave a far better resolved and well supported representation of the phylogenetic relationships within Acacia than using only amplicon sequences, with the greatest support observed when using a whole genome phylogeny as a constraint on the amplicon sequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Senegal)
    (i) DEGRADATIVE AND ANALYTICAL STUDIES OF PLANT GUM EXUDATES WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO GUM ARABIC (ACACIA SENEGAL) (ii) THE MECHANISM OF INTERACTION BETWEEN UNLIKE CELLULOSIC ETHERS AND GALACTOMANNANS IN SOLUTION. by N.A.MORRISON B.Sc. Thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh Aug 1993 The research in this thesis comprises of two sections. The first section of the research (Chapters I-IV) investigates structural degradations and analytical studies of plant gum exudates, carried out at Edinburgh University. The second section (Chapters V-Vu) investigates and develops a mechanism of interaction which exists between various water-soluble cellulose ethers and galactomannan gums in solution. The thesis was sponsored by Courtaulds Fine Chemicals, who produce several commercial cellulose ethers. I hereby declare that this thesis was composed by myself and that it is based upon results of original research experiments, carried out by me (unless otherwise stated) within the Chemistry Department, University of Edinburgh, and Courtaulds Fine Chemicals Research Department, Coventry, from October 1988 to September 1991. None of the work included in this thesis has been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Some of the analytical data reported in Chapters III and IV have been published or are in press; e.g. (a)D.M .W .Anderson, D.M.Brown-Douglas, N.A.Norrison and W.Wang, Food AddiJ. Contam; 1990, 1, (3), 303. (b)D.M.W.Anderson and N.A.Morrison, Food Addit. Contain; 1990, 1, (2), 181. (c)D.M.W.Anderson and N.A.Morrison, Food Addit. Contain; 1990, 1, (2), 175.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Darwin Reserve Project ABRS Final Report Plants
    Biodiversity survey pilot project at Charles Darwin Reserve, Western Australia Vascular Plants Report to Australian Biological Resources Study, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra Terry D. Macfarlane Western Australian Herbarium, Science Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia. 31 August 2009 Cover picture: View of York gum ( Eucalyptus loxophleba ) woodland below a greenstone ridge, with extensive Acacia shrubland in the distance, northern Charles Darwin Reserve, May 2009. (Photo T.D. Macfarlane). 2 Biodiversity survey pilot project at Charles Darwin Reserve, Western Australia Terry D. Macfarlane Western Australian Herbarium, Science Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia. Address: DEC, Locked Bag 2, Manjimup WA 6258 Project aim This project was conceived to carry out a biological survey of a reserve forming part of the National Reserve System, to provide biodiversity information for reserve management and to contribute to taxonomic knowledge including description of new species as appropriate. Survey structure A team of scientists specialising in different organism groups each with a team of Earthwatch volunteer assistants, driver and vehicle, carried out the survey following individually devised field programs, over the 1 week period 5-9 May 2009. Science teams Five science teams, each led by one of the scientists, specialised on the following organism groups: Plants, Insects (Lepidoptera), Insects (Heteroptera), Vertebrates , Arachnids. Plants were collected by the Plants team and also by some of the animal scientists, particularly Celia Symonds, in order to accurately document the insect host plants. These additional collections were identified along with the other flora vouchers, and contribute to the flora results reported here.
    [Show full text]
  • Considérations Sur L'histoire Naturelle Des Ranunculales
    Considérations sur l’histoire naturelle des Ranunculales Laetitia Carrive To cite this version: Laetitia Carrive. Considérations sur l’histoire naturelle des Ranunculales. Botanique. Université Paris-Saclay, 2019. Français. NNT : 2019SACLS177. tel-02276988 HAL Id: tel-02276988 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02276988 Submitted on 3 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Considérations sur l’histoire naturelle des Ranunculales 2019SACLS177 Thèse de doctorat de l'Université Paris-Saclay : préparée à l’Université Paris-Sud NNT École doctorale n°567 : Sciences du végétal, du gène à l'écosystème (SDV) Spécialité de doctorat : Biologie Thèse présentée et soutenue à Orsay, le 05 juillet 2019, par Laetitia Carrive Composition du Jury : Catherine Damerval Directrice de recherche, CNRS (– UMR 320 GQE) Présidente du jury Julien Bachelier Professeur, Freie Universität Berlin (– Institute of Biology) Rapporteur Thomas Haevermans Maître de conférences, MNHN (– UMR 7205 ISYEB) Rapporteur Jean-Yves Dubuisson Professeur, SU (–UMR 7205 ISYEB) Examinateur Sophie Nadot Professeure, U-PSud (– UMR 8079 ESE) Directrice de thèse « Le commencement sera d’admirer tout, même les choses les plus communes. Le milieu, d’écrire ce que l’on a bien vu et ce qui est d’utilité.
    [Show full text]
  • Karara Reserve Supplement Contents Key
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PrOGRAM Karara Reserve Supplement Contents Key Appendix A: Species Lists 3 ¤ = Previously recorded on the reserve and Fauna 4 found on this survey Vertebrates 4 * = New record for this reserve Birds 4 ^ = Exotic/Pest Frogs 5 # = EPBC listed Mammals 6 ~ = WCA listed Putative new species Reptiles 6 Previously recorded on the reserve but not found on Invertebrates 7 this survey Bees 7 Moths and Butterflies 7 EPBC = Environment Protection and Biodiversity Flies 7 Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) Beetles 8 WCA = Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 Lacewing 8 (Western Australia) True Bugs — Terrestrial 8 Cockroaches 9 Centipedes 9 Pseudoscorpions 9 Spiders 10 Scorpions 10 Snails 10 Flora 11 Flowering Plants 11 Conifers 18 Ferns 18 Lichens 18 Fungi 18 Appendix B: Rare and Threatened Species 19 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 21 2 Bush Blitz survey report — Avon Wheatbelt & Yalgoo Bioregions 2009 Appendix A: Species Lists Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this appendix are consistent with that from the Australian Faunal Directory (AFD), the Australian Plant Name Index (APNI) and the Australian Plant Census (APC). Current at March 2012 Karara Reserve Supplement 3 Fauna Vertebrates Birds Family Species Common name Acanthizidae Acanthiza apicalis Inland Thornbill Acanthiza chrysorrhoa chrysorrhoa Yellow-rumped Thornbill Acanthiza uropygialis Chestnut-rumped Thornbill Aphelocephala leucopsis castaneiventris Southern Whiteface Gerygone fusca Western Gerygone Pyrrholaemus brunneus Redthroat Smicrornis brevirostris Weebill
    [Show full text]
  • Pages 121–149
    Conservation Science W. Aust. 7 (1) : 121–149 (2008) Flora and vegetation of the banded iron formations of the Yilgarn Craton: the central Tallering Land System ADRIENNE S. MARKEY AND STEVEN J. DILLON Science Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, Wildlife Research Centre, PO Box 51, Wanneroo WA 6946 Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT A quadrat-based survey was undertaken on the flora and floristic communities of several ironstone ranges and outcrops in the Yalgoo bioregion, covering the central extent of the Tallering Land System. One hundred and three 20 x 20 m quadrats were established over the extent of this region, and covered the topographic profile of these landforms. A total of 414 taxa (species, subspecies, varieties and forms) and four hybrids were identified from these quadrats. Fifteen taxa of conservation significance were found in this survey, five of which had not been previously recorded from the area. Significant range extensions for 21 species are reported in this study. At least nine new taxa were identified, of which several are of conservation significance. Nine regional endemic and near-endemic taxa were found over the study area, with half restricted to the south-west hills. Eight floristic community types (five main types, two with subtypes) were resolved from classification analysis of floristic data (presence / absence). These community types were strongly associated with topography and soil chemistry. Geographical variation was found among the floristic communities within the region, and some communities were found to be restricted to the south-west of the survey area. These restricted communities were found to occur in the more mesic regions of the survey area, on rocky uplands of BIF, and had notable component of flora from the South West Floristic Region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Biome Shifts in Lineage Diversification
    The Role of Biome Shifts in Lineage Diversification Esther Elizabeth Dale Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy Department of Botany, University of Otago November 2018 II Abstract This thesis examines the role of biomes in lineage diversification. It explores whether biome conservatism, the tendency to remain in ancestral biomes, constrains diversification, and tests whether biome shifts are linked to characteristics of particular biomes, clades or traits. This work focuses on a series of radiations in Australia and New Zealand. Using the hyper-diverse genus Acacia in Australia, Species Distribution Models (SDM) were used to predict distributions and niche traits of 481 species in 19 clades across two biome typologies. Diversification was not constrained to any biomes, with most species (94%) occupying multiple biomes, but diversification was greatest in those biomes currently occupying larger areas. New Zealand groups (Poaceae, Melicytus, Myrsine and Pseudopanax) with small scale radiations (< 25 species) were then investigated in relation to occupancy of the three main biomes (Forest, Open and Alpine). A temporal sequence of biome availability in New Zealand allowed an examination of diversification in the context of the directional transition from forest to more open biomes. A combination of methods including SDM, biogeographical models, and trait measurements of plants grown in a common garden were utilised to explore the importance of biome shifts during diversification, the relationship between trait shifts and biome shifts, and ask if biome conservatism was prevalent in the different clades. Biome conservatism did not constrain diversification in New Zealand lineages. Biome shifts were generally frequent and more closely related to extrinsic biome factors like biome age, biome availability and relative environmental similarity between biomes, rather than to intrinsic features of lineages, such as clade size, diversification rate or age.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Sites on Credo Conservation Reserve
    Summary of Sites on Credo Conservation Reserve October 2012 – January 2014 Eucalyptus salmonophloia mid open Woodland, Credo Conservation Reserve Acknowledgments Ausplots Rangelands gratefully acknowledges the staff at Credo Conservation Reserve and at the WA Deprtment of Parks and Wildlife, in particular Nick Casson and Stephen Van Leeuwen for their help and support in the project and for allowing access to the property. Thanks also to the many other volunteers who have helped with data curation and sample processing. Thanks also to Mike Hislop and the staff from the WA Herabrium for undertaking the plant indentications. Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Accessing the Data ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Point intercept data .................................................................................................................................... 3 Plant collections .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Leaf tissue samples...................................................................................................................................... 3 Site description information .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]