DOCSLIB.ORG

Consultation on a New Magna Carta?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Consultation on A new Magna Carta? Seventh Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 3 March 2015 HC 599 Published on 9 March 2015 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Mr Graham Allen MP (Labour, Nottingham North) (Chair) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Tracey Crouch MP (Conservative, Chatham and Aylesford) Mark Durkan MP (Social Democratic & Labour Party, Foyle) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Duncan Hames MP (Liberal Democrats, Chippenham) Fabian Hamilton MP (Labour, Leeds North East) David Morris MP (Conservative, Morecambe and Lunesdale) Robert Neill MP (Conservative, Bromley and Chislehurst) Chris Ruane MP (Labour, Vale of Clwyd) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton Deane) Sheila Gilmore MP (Labour, Edinburgh East) Andrew Griffiths MP (Conservative, Burton) Simon Hart MP (Conservative, Camarthen West and South Pembrokeshire) Tristram Hunt MP (Labour, Stoke on Trent Central) Mrs Eleanor Laing MP (Conservative, Epping Forest) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) Yasmin Qureshi MP (Labour, Bolton South East) Powers The Committee’s powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in Temporary Standing Order (Political and Constitutional Reform Committee). These are available on the Internet via www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmstords.htm Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/PCRC- publications and by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/new- magna-carta-consultation Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Martyn Atkins (Clerk), Edward Faulkner (Committee Specialist), Ami Cochrane (Legal Assistant), Tony Catinella (Senior Committee Assistant), Nerys Davies (Campaign Co-ordinator), James Camp (Committee Assistant) and Jessica Bridges-Palmer (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, House of Commons, 14 Tothill Street, London SW1H 9NB. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 0737; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] Consultation on A new Magna Carta? 1 Contents Report Page 1 Consulting on A new Magna Carta? 3 Background 3 Activities to promote the consultation 5 Seminars and conferences 5 Other consultation activities 5 Use of social media 6 Responses and levels of engagement 7 2 Themes from consultation responses 9 Is the time right for constitutional reform? 10 A constitutional convention for the UK 11 A ‘constitutional moment’? 12 Is a written constitution necessary? 14 Should codification start from here? 15 How should codification be approached? 16 Our view 16 3 Further work 18 Other initiatives for constitutional renewal 18 Amendments to the blueprints 18 Consideration by the House in the 2015 Parliament 18 A draft accessible summary constitution, with options for reform 19 Conclusions and recommendations 20 Annex: A draft accessible summary constitution, with options for reform 22 Appendix 1: Winning entries in the Committee’s competition to find a preamble for a written constitution for the UK 34 Appendix 2: Proceedings of the Committee’s conference A new Magna Carta? A constitution for the 21st century, held in Portcullis House on 11 December 2014 37 Morning session: 2015—time for a ‘constitutional moment’? 37 Welcome and opening remarks 37 Professor Vernon Bogdanor: What are the prospects for constitutional reform in 2015? 42 Professor Dawn Oliver: Constitutional codification: options and challenges 45 Questions and discussion 49 Dr Andrew Blick: How should democratic principles and a settlement for the Union be reflected in a written constitution? 58 Richard Gordon QC: Reform or continuity: should a codified constitution include elements of reform or attempt to describe the UK’s current constitutional arrangements? 63 Questions and discussion 67 2 Consultation on A new Magna Carta? Afternoon session: British democracy and a written constitution 74 Dr Michele Olivier: What type of body or convention should prepare a written UK constitution? 74 Professor Ian Cram: Can agreement be reached on a Bill of Rights for the constitution? 78 Questions and discussion 83 Professor Roger Mortimore: What constitutional changes could engage the public in politics? 92 Nick Pearce: A written constitution: what’s in it for the public? 96 Alexandra Runswick, Unlocking Magna Carta: responses from the public 102 Questions and discussion 105 Closing remarks 112 Formal Minutes 114 Published written evidence 115 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 119 Consultation on A new Magna Carta? 3 1 Consulting on A new Magna Carta? 1. On 10 July 2014 the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee of the House of Commons launched a broad consultation on the question of codification of the United Kingdom’s constitution.1 We published three illustrative blueprints for a codified constitution—a Constitutional Code, a Constitutional Consolidation Act and a written constitution—prepared for us by the Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies at King’s College London, and framed our consultation around three questions: • Does the UK need a codified constitution? • If so, which of the three options offers the best way forward? • What needs to be included in/excluded from your favoured option if you have one? 2. We said that the initial consultation would close on 1 January 2015.The level of public involvement in this consultation has been unprecedented for this Committee, with over 3,000 separate interactions with the Select Committee. We report below on the conduct of the consultation and the activities organised to promote the Committee’s work, and on a number of themes which have emerged from the responses to our consultation. We do not intend discussion of constitutional proposals to end here, and we have proposed a draft accessible summary of the UK’s constitution, with illustrative options for reform, to inform continuing debate on codifying our democratic settlement throughout the General Election campaign, the Magna Carta anniversary year and beyond. Background 3. The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee was established by the House of Commons in June 2010 with a remit to consider political and constitutional reform. The proposal by the coalition Government to establish fixed-term parliaments of five years, enacted in the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, gave the Committee the freedom to plan a programme of work more expansive in scope than select committees before 2010 had generally been able to contemplate. 4. In September 2010 the Committee, in a unique innovation, accepted a proposal from asked the Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies at King’s College London to collaborate on an inquiry entitled Mapping the path to codifying—or not codifying—the UK’s Constitution. At our request the Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies, under the direction of Professor Robert Blackburn, produced a series of research papers for the Committee, including a literature review and a comparative study of 23 international examples of constitutional codification. The last of these research papers, prepared to inform the Committee’s inquiry and the policy debate on constitutional codification more widely, was delivered to the Committee in June 2014 and published as an appendix to the Committee’s report entitled A new Magna Carta? The paper contained a number of elements: 1 Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, Second Report of Session 2014-15, A new Magna Carta?, HC 463. 4 Consultation on A new Magna Carta? • a chapter setting out arguments for and against a codified constitution • a chapter setting out the process that could be adopted in the preparation, design and implementation of a codified constitution • three illustrative blueprints—a Constitutional Code, a Constitutional Consolidation Act, and a written constitution—which indicate how a codified constitution for the UK could take shape. 5. We published the paper to inform debate on constitutional codification as the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta and the 2015 General Election approached: as our report stated, “what we are publishing now represents the most comprehensive attempt so far to provide different detailed models of a codified constitution for comparison and consideration”. We hope that this consciously large document of 423 pages continues to act as a resource for all politicians and electors who have an interest in codification of the UK’s democratic arrangements. 6. We made clear in our report that we did not endorse one view or the other in the debate on codification: the three models of codification were published to inform and advance the debate on the desirability or otherwise of codification. Our stated aim was “to ensure that, if and when a decision is taken to make progress [on constitutional codification], a thoroughly scrutinised and properly devised plan is already in place to achieve a successful outcome.”2 7. We also made clear that, although the written constitution blueprint
Recommended publications
  • Three Priests Ordained for the Diocese of Oakland

    Three Priests Ordained for the Diocese of Oakland

    The Catholic Voice is on Facebook VOL. 57, NO. 11 DIOCESE OF OAKLAND JUNE 10, 2019 www.catholicvoiceoakland.org Serving the East Bay Catholic Community since 1963 Copyright 2019 Three priests ordained for the Diocese of Oakland By Michele Jurich Staff writer Addressing the three men before him, “Soon-to-be Father Mark, Father John and Father Javier,” Bishop Michael C. Barber, SJ, told them, “you are called and chosen” and told them what serving means today. In front of a crowded Cathedral of Christ the Light Bishop Barber told them he was zeroing in on the third vow they would take shortly, to celebrate the Mass and administer the Sacrament of Confession worthily. “You will never violate the Seal of Confession,” Bishop Barber told the three new priests. “No state or government can oblige you to betray your penitents.” Legislation — SB 360 — has passed the state Senate and is moving to the Assembly. It will compel a priest to reveal to police some sins he hears in confession. The new priests, John Anthony Pietruszka, 32, Javier Ramirez, 43, and Mark Ruiz, 56, listened attentively. Father Pietruszka is from Fall River Massachusetts; Father Ramirez from Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico; and Mark Father Ruiz was born and raised in Oakland. They would not be alone, the bishop assured them. To show that support, more than 70 VOICE CATHOLIC PACCIORINI/THE C. ALBERT priests, mostly diocesan, were present to With Bishop Michael C. Barber, SJ, at left, the trio of men prostrate themselves at the altar. This symbolizes each man’s offer blessings and the sign of peace to unworthiness for the office to be assumed and his dependence upon God and the prayers of the Christian community.
  • Why Did Britain Become a Republic? > New Government

    Why Did Britain Become a Republic? > New Government

    Civil War > Why did Britain become a republic? > New government Why did Britain become a republic? Case study 2: New government Even today many people are not aware that Britain was ever a republic. After Charles I was put to death in 1649, a monarch no longer led the country. Instead people dreamed up ideas and made plans for a different form of government. Find out more from these documents about what happened next. Report on the An account of the Poem on the arrest of setting up of the new situation in Levellers, 1649 Commonwealth England, 1649 Portrait & symbols of Cromwell at the The setting up of Cromwell & the Battle of the Instrument Commonwealth Worcester, 1651 of Government http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/ Page 1 Civil War > Why did Britain become a republic? > New government Case study 2: New government - Source 1 A report on the arrest of some Levellers, 29 March 1649 (Catalogue ref: SP 25/62, pp.134-5) What is this source? This is a report from a committee of MPs to Parliament. It explains their actions against the leaders of the Levellers. One of the men they arrested was John Lilburne, a key figure in the Leveller movement. What’s the background to this source? Before the war of the 1640s it was difficult and dangerous to come up with new ideas and try to publish them. However, during the Civil War censorship was not strongly enforced. Many political groups emerged with new ideas at this time. One of the most radical (extreme) groups was the Levellers.
  • 1 Law and the Construction of Policy. a Comparative Analysis Edward C

    1 Law and the Construction of Policy. a Comparative Analysis Edward C

    Law and the Construction of Policy. A Comparative Analysis Edward C Page Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science Paper prepared for the Annual Conference of the Political Studies Association, Brighton, Session 6 Executive Politics, Bureaucracy and Legislation Tuesday 22 March 15:30-17:00 . DRAFT. Abstract Like many other things, statutes are shaped by their environments. It is possible to show that a range of constitutional and institutional constraints produce characteristics shared by much legislation in one jurisdiction that distinguish it from much legislation in others. These characteristics include features such as the specificity of the language in which laws are written, how statutes delegate powers, the use of symbolism in legislation and the degree to which policy is developed in a cumulative manner. These features are not matters of “culture” or “style” but rather result from a) the role of statute in the wider legal-administrative system and b) the mode of production of legislation. This argument is developed on the basis of an analysis of 1,150 laws passed in 2014 in Germany, France, the UK, Sweden and the USA. Legislation is arguably the most powerful instrument of government (see Hood 1983). It is the expression of government authority backed up by the state's "monopoly of legitimate force" (Weber 1983). Yet apart from their authoritativeness there is rather little that can be said about the characteristics of laws as tools of government. In fact, each law is unique in what precisely it permits, mandates, authorises and prohibits, and to what ends. In this paper I explore a way of looking at legislation in between these two levels of abstraction: on the one hand law as supreme instrument and on the other laws as the idiosyncratic content of any individual piece of legislation.
  • Evolution and Gestalt of the State in the United Kingdom

    Evolution and Gestalt of the State in the United Kingdom

    Martin Loughlin Evolution and Gestalt of the state in the United Kingdom Book section (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Originally published in: Cassese, Sabino, von Bogdandy, Armin and Huber, Peter, (eds.) The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law: The Administrative State. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017 © 2017 Oxford University Press This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/81516/ Available in LSE Research Online: June 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Ius Publicum Europaeum: The Max Planck Handbook of European Public Law Vol. I: Public Law and Public Authority § 15: United Kingdom Martin Loughlin Outline 1. INTRODUCTION 2. STATE 2.1. Introduction 2.2. State formation 2.3. The Crown, the Government and the Body Politic 2.4. Crown Prerogatives 3.
  • Corpus Christi College the Pelican Record

    Corpus Christi College the Pelican Record

    CORPUS CHRISTI COLLEGE THE PELICAN RECORD Vol. LII December 2016 i The Pelican Record Editor: Mark Whittow Design and Printing: Lynx DPM Published by Corpus Christi College, Oxford 2016 Website: http://www.ccc.ox.ac.uk Email: [email protected] The editor would like to thank Rachel Pearson, Julian Reid, Joanna Snelling, Sara Watson and David Wilson. Front cover: Detail of the restored woodwork in the College Chapel. Back cover: The Chapel after the restoration work. Both photographs: Nicholas Read ii The Pelican Record CONTENTS President’s Report .................................................................................... 3 Carol Service 2015 Judith Maltby.................................................................................................... 12 Claymond’s Dole Mark Whittow .................................................................................................. 16 The Hallifax Bowl Richard Foster .................................................................................................. 20 Poisoning, Cannibalism and Victorian England in the Arctic: The Discovery of HMS Erebus Cheryl Randall ................................................................................................. 25 An MCR/SCR Seminar: “An Uneasy Partnership?: Science and Law” Liz Fisher .......................................................................................................... 32 Rubbage in the Garden David Leake .....................................................................................................
  • The Canadian Bar Review

    The Canadian Bar Review

    THE CANADIAN BAR REVIEW VOL . XXX OCTOBER 1952 NO . 8 The Rule Against the Use of Legislative History: "Canon of Construction or Counsel Of Caution"? D. G . KILGOUR* . Toronto I. Introduction The question whether the rule against the use of legislative his- tory is a "canon of construction or counsel of caution" I is only one', but perhaps the least explored, 2 aspect of the general problem of admissibility of extrinsic evidence in the interpretation of written documents. This general problem, in turn, is only one, but perhaps the most important,3 aspect of interpretation at large, which is a problem of general jurisprudence. In fact, juris- prudence itself has been defined as the art of interpreting laws.4 Interpretation or construction of a statute, as of any written document, is an exercise in the ascertainment of meaning. On principle, therefore; everything which is logically relevant should be admissible. Since a statute is an instrument of government * D. G. Kilgour, B .A. (Tor.), LL.M. (Harv.), of the Ontario Bar . Assist- ant Professor, School of Law, University of Toronto. 1 Per Bowen L. J. in Re Jodrell (1890),, L.R. 44 Ch.D. 590, at p. 614. 2 Lauterpacht, Some Observations on Preparatory Work in the Interpreta- tion of Treaties (1935), 48 Harv. L. Rev. 549, at p. 558. 3 Frankfurter, Some Reflections on the Reading of Statutes (1947), 47 Col. L. Rev. 527, at p. 529 : "I should say that the troublesome phase of construction is the determination of the extent to which extraneous docu- mentation and external circumstances may be allowed to infiltrate the text on, ihé theory that they were part of it, written in ink discernable to the judicial eye" .
  • Isabella Mils M

    Isabella Mils M

    mulit bur btonittr, ^ C. _id. ..i1OTTE(R, Editor cS- Publisher. Established by SAMUEL MOTTER in 1879. TEP.,115.4.z.c o a Year in Advance. VOL. XIII. EMMITSBURG-, MARYLAND, FRIDAY, APRIL, 22, 1892. SONG. DIRECTORY A SPRING l and dry the hides, and "keep speeches, and last, though not least, A LEGAL vtEw. FOR FREDERICK COUNTY Old Mother Earth woke up from sleep, house" generally. Three, including divine service was held with a hymn Qtlad'w Little ea ery ef it Lawyer and a Railroad Aceidi nt. And found she was cold and bare; myself and Vandewater, were by and prayer, led by a devout man Circuit Com t. The Winter was o'er, the Spring was lie sat just opposite to me in the "drawing straws" detailed to follow Chief Judge--Hon. James atesheery. by the name of Captain Burehard, Amioclate Judges-Hon. John T. Vinson and near, train, and from the legal documents the hunters with the wagon. The and we closed the night's festivi- Bon. John A. Lynch. And she had not a dress to wear. Attorney-Edw. S. Eicheitiorger. he was perusing .had lit doubt State's hunters were paired off in couples Clerk of the Court-John L. Jordan. "Alas l" she sighed, with great dismay, ties by voting Roland Simmons the Court. that he was a lawyer. I looked tint Orphan's "Oh, where shall I get my clothes? to describe a circle of five or six hero of the day. elteleee-Betiard Collitiower, John R. Mille. of the window as the blew There's whistle Harriman not a place to buy a suit, miles, each couple having a horn, Our sport was kept up for six Register of Wills-James K.
  • Robert Blackburn

    Robert Blackburn

    ROBERT BLACKBURN Professor of Constitutional Law, King's College London "The Influence of Magna Carta on the British Constitution" Conference at Amiens University to commemorate Magna Carta’s 800th anniversary, 7-9 December 2015 Thank you very much for your introduction, and thank you very much Sophie for organising this marvellous conference; it is a wonderful gathering. And I would also like to thank and dedicate what I am going to say to my wife Paula, since there is another anniversary at the moment, which is my thirtieth wedding anniversary. It must show just how important Magna Carta is to me that I am here today celebrating the anniversary of this great constitutional document rather than at home with my wife celebrating our thirty years of happiness together. But we will do so over Christmas instead. What I would like to offer today is some thoughts and reflections about British constitutionalism in the context of Magna Carta. And I take the principles, symbolic principles, of Magna Carta as being the Rule of Law, democracy and human rights. Now those are not precisely what the barons had in mind in 1215 but as has been emphasised by our previous speakers the significance of Magna Carta today lies in its symbolic aspects. These are the principles that it has come to represent, in embryonic form in 1215. These were that our rulers cannot do whatever they like, they are subject to limitations and principles, and government should be by consent of the nation, later giving rise to the concept of democracy itself.
  • DEPUTY VICE-CHANCELLOR: ACADEMIC Reflective Report 2020

    DEPUTY VICE-CHANCELLOR: ACADEMIC Reflective Report 2020

    DEPUTY VICE-CHANCELLOR: ACADEMIC Reflective Report 2020 Contents DEPUTY VICE-CHANCELLOR (ACADEMIC) Reflective Report 2020 2 FACULTY OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES 26 FACULTY OF COMMUNITY AND HEALTH SCIENCES 46 FACULTY OF DENTISTRY 62 FACULTY OF EDUCATION 80 FACULTY OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES 108 FACULTY OF LAW 130 FACULTY OF NATURAL SCIENCES 140 ACADEMIC PLANNING UNIT 156 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT UNIT 160 CENTRE FOR INNOVATIVE EDUCATION & COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (CIECT) 168 CENTRE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS 186 DIRECTORATE OF LEARNING, TEACHING AND STUDENT SUCCESS (DLTSS) 192 page Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Academic | Reflective Report 2020 1 DEPUTY VICE-CHANCELLOR: ACADEMIC PROF VIVIENNE LAWACK Reflective Report 2020 Since 2017, every Dean and Director within my line has compiled a Reflective Report, which I consolidate, adding my own reflections. The consolidated DVC (Academic) Reflective Report is intended to reflect on the state of the academic project, through the lenses of the seven faculties at the University of the Western Cape (UWC), together with the academic professional support directorates within this portfolio. Given the cataclysmic effects of the ongoing pandemic, it would be remiss not to reflect fully on the impact of the pandemic on the academic project and how we managed to complete the 2020 academic year and start the 2021 academic year timeously. This Reflective Report contains an overview of our academic approach and decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, as well as a self-evaluation of the most pertinent work done during the course of the current Institutional Operation Plan (IOP 2016—2020), including the successes and work that need to be consolidated or accelerated, and opportunities for innovation in the next IOP.
  • Essex Under Cromwell: Security and Local Governance in the Interregnum

    Essex Under Cromwell: Security and Local Governance in the Interregnum

    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Summer 1-1-2012 Essex under Cromwell: Security and Local Governance in the Interregnum James Robert McConnell Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the European History Commons, Military History Commons, and the Political History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation McConnell, James Robert, "Essex under Cromwell: Security and Local Governance in the Interregnum" (2012). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 686. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.686 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Essex under Cromwell: Security and Local Governance in the Interregnum by James Robert McConnell A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In History Thesis Committee: Caroline Litzenberger, Chair Thomas Luckett David A. Johnson Jesse Locker Portland State University ©2012 Abstract In 1655, Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell’s Council of State commissioned a group of army officers for the purpose of “securing the peace of the commonwealth.” Under the authority of the Instrument of Government , a written constitution not sanctioned by Parliament, the Council sent army major-generals into the counties to raise new horse militias and to support them financially with a tax on Royalists which the army officers would also collect. In counties such as Essex—the focus of this study—the major-generals were assisted in their work by small groups of commissioners, mostly local men “well-affected” to the Interregnum government.
  • Narratives of Perceived Social Support As a Mediator for Increased Coping Resources and Optimism Among Cancer Patients and Survi

    Narratives of Perceived Social Support As a Mediator for Increased Coping Resources and Optimism Among Cancer Patients and Survi

    NARRATIVES OF PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT AS A MEDIATOR FOR INCREASED COPING RESOURCES AND OPTIMISM AMONG CANCER PATIENTS AND SURVIVORS by TAVARI TAYLOR BROWN A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty in the Counselor duration and Supervision Program of Penfield College at Mercer University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Atlanta, GA 2014 COPYRIGHT 2015 UMI Number: 3662748 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Di!ss0?t&Ciori Publishing UMI 3662748 Published by ProQuest LLC 2015. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 COPYRIGHT 2015 TAVARI TAYLOR BROWN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you, Terrence Dominic Brown for nearly five years of evenings alone, waking up at 2:00 a.m. wondering why your wife is in another room reading or typing under dim light, and for a commitment to our marriage. Thank you, Talia G. Brown for being the best fetus, neonate, and daughter in the history of the world ever known to mankind! To “Dee,” the pink-ribbon binding four out of five narratives. We miss you so! Thank you for sharing your wonderful light, life, and “effervescence” as one interview participant stated.
  • SUPREME COURT of INDIA Page 1 of 63 PETITIONER: SUKHDEV SINGH & ORS

    SUPREME COURT of INDIA Page 1 of 63 PETITIONER: SUKHDEV SINGH & ORS

    http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 63 PETITIONER: SUKHDEV SINGH & ORS Vs. RESPONDENT: BAGATRAM SARDAR SINGH RAGHUVANSHI AND ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT21/02/1975 BENCH: RAY, A.N. (CJ) BENCH: RAY, A.N. (CJ) MATHEW, KUTTYIL KURIEN CHANDRACHUD, Y.V. ALAGIRISWAMI, A. GUPTA, A.C. CITATION: 1975 AIR 1331 1975 SCR (3) 619 1975 SCC (1) 421 CITATOR INFO : R 1976 SC 888 (9) R 1976 SC1027 (14) RF 1976 SC1913 (11) RF 1976 SC2216 (7) D 1978 SC 252 (12) D 1979 SC 65 (3,10) D 1979 SC1084 (20) F 1979 SC1628 (10,13,15,16,18,27,33) R 1980 SC 840 (8,10,14,21) RF 1980 SC2181 (136) RF 1981 SC 212 (32,36,38,42,44,46,48,49,50,52 RF 1981 SC 487 (8,14,16) RF 1981 SC 818 (19) RF 1981 SC1395 (10) R 1982 SC 917 (20) F 1984 SC 363 (22) F 1984 SC 541 (13) RF 1984 SC1130 (53) RF 1984 SC1361 (26,27) RF 1984 SC1897 (7,8) APL 1985 SC1046 (5) RF 1986 SC1370 (101) R 1986 SC1571 (43,51,69,105) RF 1987 SC1086 (12,15,26) RF 1988 SC 469 (6,7,8,9) APL 1989 SC 341 (9) F 1991 SC 101 (12,32,35,40,170,201,223,236) RF 1992 SC 76 (2) ACT: Statutory Corporations--Regulations made by, whether have force of law--Whether employees of corporation are servants of Union or State. Constitution of India, Art. 12--Whether statutory corporations are 'State' or 'authority'.