DOCSLIB.ORG

Winter Wren (Troglodytes Hiemalis) Skye Christopher G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Winter Wren (Troglodytes Hiemalis) Skye Christopher G Winter Wren (Troglodytes hiemalis) Skye Christopher G. Haas Iron Co., MI 5/30/2009 © Elizabeth Rogers (Click to view a comparison of Atlas I to II) Sporting a voice larger than the bird itself, this It is likely that densities were negatively charming sprite is a vocal acrobat with a affected by the extensive white pine harvest of dizzying song that rings out from moist, dark the second half of the 1800s, although forests of the north. Arthur C. Bent (1948) was unharvested hemlock and cedar communities moved to describe this champion songster’s provided enough refugia to maintain a stable utterances as: “Wonderful…charming… population (Brewer 1991). Barrows (1912) marvelous…startling…entrancing…copious, reported the species to be common in the UP rapid, prolonged and penetrating, having a great and NLP, and nesting evidence was obtained variety of the sweetest tones, and uttered in a south to Montcalm, Kent and Ottawa Counties. rising and falling or finely undulating He also speculated that both nesting and melody…as if the very atmosphere became wintering were possible in the lower tier of resonant… [a] gushing melody, which seems at counties, although no conclusive evidence once expressive of the wildest joy and the existed. tenderest sadness”. Winter Wrens (along with Pacific Wren in western North America), were MBBA I shows a distribution similar to the one recently spilt from the Old World species, described by Barrows (1912). Widespread simply known as the Wren. Winter Wrens can across the UP, BBS data showed the highest be found from northeastern British Columbia densities could be found in the unbroken forests and northern Alberta across Canada to of the Ottawa National Forest. Their range in Newfoundland, south to Minnesota east to New the LP was primarily northern, stretching England and south in the Appalachians to southwest from Lake Huron to the Manistee northeastern Georgia (Chesser et al. 2010). National Forest to along the tension zone into Muskegon County. Winter Wrens were mostly Distribution absent from around the agricultural lands of the There was probably very little change in the Saginaw Bay, though small disjunct populations status and distribution of the Winter Wren in were found in Tuscola/Lapeer Counties and Michigan from the establishment of mature Allegan County. However, breeding was not forest communities after the last glacial period confirmed in the SLP. until the mid-19th century, with birds residing over the northern 2/3 of the state, south to the MBBA II showed a slight overall increase from tension zone. MBBA I in the number of recorded townships © 2011 Kalamazoo Nature Center Winter Wren (Troglodytes hiemalis) Skye Christopher G. Haas (from 32% to 35%), but this increase was only and mossy substrates and rarely on the branches visible in the UP, where the percentage jumped of a standing or fallen tree (Hejl 2002). Egg- from 62% to 74%. The NLP showed a decrease laying can begin as soon as late April, and atlas from 35% to 34% and, in the SLP, the workers in Wisconsin found fledgling young on distribution was reduced from 3% to 1%. the early date of 26 May (Wolf and Howe Breeding confirmation also retreated northward 2006). Clutch size is typically five to seven to the next tier of counties with the eggs which are incubated for 14-16 days. southernmost confirmed breeding occurring in Young generally remain in the nest for 19 days, Crawford and Ogemaw Counties. Confirmation and are fed by both parents, even after leaving is difficult for this secretive species, and there the nest (Hejl 2002, Wolf and Howe 2006). One were only confirmed breeding records for 36 to two broods a summer are possible, not townships, despite being recorded in a total of including re-nesting attempts (Hejl 2002). 669 townships. Abundance and Population Trends Conifer forests, particularly spruce bogs, cedar (Click to view trends from the BBS) swamps and old-growth pine/hemlock forests Partners in Flight (PIF 2007) estimates that are favored habitats, though in Upper Michigan, there are 160,000 Winter Wrens in Michigan, the species can be commonly found in moist and this represents 0.4% of the global mature/old-growth mesic deciduous forests, as population (which also includes the super- long as there is a water component (usually a species complex of Pacific and Eurasian Wren). forest stream that provides a cooler BBS data for eastern North America shows the microclimate), dead-fall, a lush undergrowth highest percentage of birds in the Closed Boreal and often glacial debris in the form of boulders Forests, while some of the lowest numbers are and stone outcroppings. Winter Wrens require in the Great Lakes Transitional zones (Sauer et structurally complex forests, with much dead al. 2008). National BBS data trends from 1966 wood in the form of fallen trees with exposed to 2008 showed only a 0.9% increase with a root masses and are frequently associated with more recent trend of a significant annual water, particularly streams, but also bogs, decrease of 3.7% from 2003-2008, though this swamps and lake edges (Hejl et al. 2002). Also dataset includes Pacific Wren (Ziolkowski et al important are broken openings or edges in the 2010). forest, and heavily vegetated cover that includes shrubs, ferns, and mosses (Ewert 1991, Hejl et It is certainly a common bird in appropriate al. 2002). habitat in the UP, and one of the most abundant birds in summer on Manitou Island, Keweenaw Breeding Biology County, where in June 2002, 35 were recorded Winter Wrens return to their breeding territories on 21 of 22 point counts. This tiny bird migrates as early as late March, but more typically in over Lake Superior and has been observed early to mid-April (Nelson 1994). In years of flying in off of the lake in the fall in Keweenaw substantial lingering snow cover, all birds may County (Binford 2006). not be back on territory until early May. Males arrive first and build one to several nests, of Numbers of Winter Wrens seem to be which the female selects one and lines the increasing in the state, or at least a higher rate of interior (Hejl et al. 2002). The nest is often detection has been established. It is possible that domed, and is usually placed within the root the increase in observations in the UP may be structure of an up-turned tree. Nests are also related to better atlas coverage in MBBA II placed in or under creek banks, decaying logs, rather than an actual increase in birds. However the obvious decline of birds in the LP, even as © 2011 Kalamazoo Nature Center Winter Wren (Troglodytes hiemalis) Skye Christopher G. Haas forests are reaching a level of preferred habitat Chesser, R.T., R.C. Banks, F.K. Barker, C. maturation as farming practices are abandoned, Cicero, J.L. Dunn, A.W. Kratter, I.J. is troubling. Lovette, P.C. Rasmussen, J.V. Remsen Jr., J.D. Rising, D.F. Stotz, and K. Winker. Conservation Needs 2010. Fifty-first Supplement to the The absence of deer on Manitou Island, American Ornithologists' Union Check-List Keweenaw County, has demonstrated how of North American Birds. Auk 127(3): 726- ample evergreen shrubbery (yew) can benefit 744. Winter Wrens (Binford 2006, pers. obs). Deer Ewert, D.N. 1991. Winter Wren. In Brewer, R., herds on the mainland frequently over-browse in G.A. McPeek, and R.J. Adams Jr. (eds.). cedar swamps and other favored Winter Wren 1991. The Atlas of Breeding Birds of breeding locations. Extensive logging also Michigan. Michigan State University Press. would negatively affect this species, especially East Lansing, MI. in boreal habitat where Winter Wrens are Hejl, S.J., J.A. Holmes, and D.E. Kroodsma. primarily found in mature to old-growth forest. 2002. Winter Wren (Troglodytes Winter Wrens have been shown to be negatively troglodytes). In The Birds of North America, affected by forest fragmentation, and this should No. 623 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The be reflected in any forest management plan Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, (Hejl 2002, Wolf and Howe 2006). PA. Nelson, C. 1994. Winter Wren. In McPeek, As a species intrinsically tied to the boreal G.A., and R.J. Adams (eds.). 1994. The forests, the Winter Wren is another bellwether Birds of Michigan. Indiana University Press. of the disappearance of this biome. A Winter Indianapolis, IN. Wren’s habitat is as delightful as its song, and if Partners in Flight (PIF). 2007. PIF Landbird both these spectacular joys of the north woods Population Estimates Database [web were to disappear, we will have lost much application]. Version 2004. Rocky indeed. Mountain Bird Observatory. <http://www.rmbo.org/pif_db/laped/default. Literature Citations aspx>. Barrows, WB. 1912. Michigan Bird Life. Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, and J. Fallon. 2008. The Special Bulletin. Michigan Agricultural North American Breeding Bird Survey, College. Lansing, MI. Results and Analysis 1966-2007. Version Bent, A. C. 1948. Life Histories of North 5.15.2008. USGS Patuxent Wildlife American Nuthatches, Wrens, Thrashers, Research Center. Laurel, MD. and Their Allies. U.S. National Museum Wolf, A.T., and R.W. Howe 2006. Winter Bulletin 195. Wren. In Cutright, N.J., B.R. Harriman, and Binford, L.C. 2006. Birds of the Keweenaw R.W. Howe. 2006. Atlas of the Breeding Peninsula, Michigan. MP 195. University of Birds of Wisconsin. Wisconsin Society for Michigan Muzeum of Zoology. Ann Arbor, Ornithology. Waukesha, WI. MI. Ziolkowski Jr., D.J., and K.L. Pardieck, and J.R. Brewer, R. 1991. Original avifauna and post Sauer. 2010. The 2003-2008 Summary of settlement changes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 6.5 Coastal Cactus Wren (Campylorhynchus Brunneicapillus Sandiegensis) – Category SO Management Units with Known Occurrences
    Volume 2D: Goals and Objectives for Species Focus Management Species 6.0 Birds 6.5 Coastal Cactus Wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus sandiegensis) – Category SO Management Units with Known Occurrences Coastal cactus wrens are restricted to cactus-dominated coastal sage scrub habitats in Southern California, from Ventura south to San Diego County and inland to western San Bernardino and western Riverside Counties. These wrens differ ecologically from more common desert wrens in the southwestern United States and northern Mexico. Coastal cactus wrens began significantly declining in San Diego County in the early 1980s due to habitat loss to agriculture and urban development (Rea and Weaver 1990). By 1990 there was a 33% population decline from the previous decade as a result of the loss of coastal birds and smaller populations, and a decline in abundance of remaining populations. Coastal cactus wren surveys and cactus mapping were implemented on Conserved Lands in the MSPA in 2009 and 2011 (USFWS 2011). Cactus wrens were documented on Conserved Lands in MUs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (see Occurrence Table and online map: http://arcg.is/2kU1bka). A range-wide genetics and banding study was conducted across occupied cactus scrub habitats in 2011–2013 by USGS to determine coastal cactus wren population genetic structure, connectivity, and genetic diversity in Southern California (Barr et al. 2015). The study found 3 main genetic clusters in San Diego County: Otay; San Diego/El Cajon (Sweetwater/Encanto/Lake Jennings); and San Pasqual. In the San Diego/El Cajon genetic cluster, wrens in the Sweetwater River watershed are connected to occurrences in Fletcher Hills and Lake Jennings to the northeast in MU4 and to occurrences in Encanto Canyon and other urban canyons to the west in MU2.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement
    PROTECTING NESTING BIRDS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR VEGETATION AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Version 3.0 May 2017 1 CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 2.0 BIRDS IN PORTLAND 4 3.0 NESTING BEHAVIOR OF PORTLAND BIRDS 4 3.1 Timing 4 3.2 Nesting Habitats 5 4.0 GENERAL GUIDELINES 9 4.1 What if Work Must Occur During Avoidance Periods? 10 4.2 Who Conducts a Nesting Bird Survey? 10 5.0 SPECIFIC GUIDELINES 10 5.1 Stream Enhancement Construction Projects 10 5.2 Invasive Species Management 10 - Blackberry - Clematis - Garlic Mustard - Hawthorne - Holly and Laurel - Ivy: Ground Ivy - Ivy: Tree Ivy - Knapweed, Tansy and Thistle - Knotweed - Purple Loosestrife - Reed Canarygrass - Yellow Flag Iris 5.3 Other Vegetation Management 14 - Live Tree Removal (Native and Non-Native) - Snag Removal - Shrub Removal (Native and Non-Native) - Grassland Mowing and Ground Cover Removal (Native and Non-Native) - Controlled Burn 5.4 Other Management Activities 16 - Removing Structures - Manipulating Water Levels 6.0 SENSITIVE AREAS 17 7.0 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS 17 7.1 Species 17 7.2 Other Things to Keep in Mind 19 Best Management Practices: Avoiding Impacts on Nesting Birds Version 3.0 –May 2017 2 8.0 WHAT IF YOU FIND AN ACTIVE NEST ON A PROJECT SITE 19 DURING PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION? 9.0 WHAT IF YOU FIND A BABY BIRD OUT OF ITS NEST? 19 10.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AVOIDING 20 IMPACTS ON NESTING BIRDS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REVEGETATION PROJECTS APPENDICES A—Average Arrival Dates for Birds in the Portland Metro Area 21 B—Nesting Birds by Habitat in Portland 22 C—Bird Nesting Season and Work Windows 25 D—Nest Buffer Best Management Practices: 26 Protocol for Bird Nest Surveys, Buffers and Monitoring E—Vegetation and Other Management Recommendations 38 F—Special Status Bird Species Most Closely Associated with Special 45 Status Habitats G— If You Find a Baby Bird Out of its Nest on a Project Site 48 H—Additional Things You Can Do To Help Native Birds 49 FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • IMBCR Report
    Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions (IMBCR): 2015 Field Season Report June 2016 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 14500 Lark Bunting Lane Brighton, CO 80603 303-659-4348 www.birdconservancy.org Tech. Report # SC-IMBCR-06 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies Connecting people, birds and land Mission: Conserving birds and their habitats through science, education and land stewardship Vision: Native bird populations are sustained in healthy ecosystems Bird Conservancy of the Rockies conserves birds and their habitats through an integrated approach of science, education and land stewardship. Our work radiates from the Rockies to the Great Plains, Mexico and beyond. Our mission is advanced through sound science, achieved through empowering people, realized through stewardship and sustained through partnerships. Together, we are improving native bird populations, the land and the lives of people. Core Values: 1. Science provides the foundation for effective bird conservation. 2. Education is critical to the success of bird conservation. 3. Stewardship of birds and their habitats is a shared responsibility. Goals: 1. Guide conservation action where it is needed most by conducting scientifically rigorous monitoring and research on birds and their habitats within the context of their full annual cycle. 2. Inspire conservation action in people by developing relationships through community outreach and science-based, experiential education programs. 3. Contribute to bird population viability and help sustain working lands by partnering with landowners and managers to enhance wildlife habitat. 4. Promote conservation and inform land management decisions by disseminating scientific knowledge and developing tools and recommendations. Suggested Citation: White, C. M., M. F. McLaren, N. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife of the North Hills: Birds, Animals, Butterflies
    Wildlife of the North Hills: Birds, Animals, Butterflies Oakland, California 2005 About this Booklet The idea for this booklet grew out of a suggestion from Anne Seasons, President of the North Hills Phoenix Association, that I compile pictures of local birds in a form that could be made available to residents of the north hills. I expanded on that idea to include other local wildlife. For purposes of this booklet, the “North Hills” is defined as that area on the Berkeley/Oakland border bounded by Claremont Avenue on the north, Tunnel Road on the south, Grizzly Peak Blvd. on the east, and Domingo Avenue on the west. The species shown here are observed, heard or tracked with some regularity in this area. The lists are not a complete record of species found: more than 50 additional bird species have been observed here, smaller rodents were included without visual verification, and the compiler lacks the training to identify reptiles, bats or additional butterflies. We would like to include additional species: advice from local experts is welcome and will speed the process. A few of the species listed fall into the category of pests; but most - whether resident or visitor - are desirable additions to the neighborhood. We hope you will enjoy using this booklet to identify the wildlife you see around you. Kay Loughman November 2005 2 Contents Birds Turkey Vulture Bewick’s Wren Red-tailed Hawk Wrentit American Kestrel Ruby-crowned Kinglet California Quail American Robin Mourning Dove Hermit thrush Rock Pigeon Northern Mockingbird Band-tailed
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Breeding Bird Survey 2003
    THE ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA BOROUGH BREEDING BIRD SURVEY 2003 SURVEY REPORT By GRAHAM GIDDENS INDEX INTRODUCTION, survey techniques etc………………………………………page 1 NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY OF RESULTS………………………………page 3 LIST OF BIRDS OBSERVED IN THE BOROUGH…………………………..page 4 INDIVIDUAL SITES Holland Park……………………………………………………………….…page 6 Grand Union Canal…………………………………………………………..page 12 The River Thames and Chelsea Creek……………………………………...page 15 Kensington Gardens and Kensington Palace Grounds…………………….page 17 Kensal Green Cemetery……………………………………………………...page 19 Chelsea Physic Garden……………………………………………………….page 21 Olympia Wood………………………………………………………………..page 23 Ladbroke Square Garden…………………………………………………….page 25 RECOMMENDATIONS……………………………………………………...page 27 OVERALL COMPARISONS WITH PREVIOUS YEARS…………………..page 28 BOROUGH BREEDING BIRD INDICATOR……………………………….page 32 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………...page 36 1 INTRODUCTION The survey period ran from the beginning of April until the end of August. The sites surveyed included all of the Sites of Metropolitan Importance, as defined by the Borough Ecological Survey 1993, as well as a single Site of Borough Importance Grade 1 (the Chelsea Physic Garden). This year two new sites were included: Olympia Wood, (a small area of woodland sandwiched between railway lines and buildings in the South West of the Borough), and Labroke Square Garden, (a large private garden amongst housing in the centre of the Borough). The latter was surveyed during the original Borough Bird Survey of 1995/96. Holland Park was the main focus of attention, because the Park contains a number of enclosures that are actively managed for wildlife, and the continued gathering of ornithological data aids conservation initiatives at the site. In addition to the sites already mentioned, smaller ones, such as Meanwhile Wildlife Garden and Kensal Green Gas Works were also partly surveyed, and are analysed in the context of the larger sites which they border.
    [Show full text]
  • The Circumnavigation of Sicily Bird List -- September 26
    The Circumnavigation of Sicily Bird List -- September 26 - October 8, 2017 Produced by Jim Wilson Date of sighting in September and October 2017 Key for Locations on Page 2 Common Name Scientific Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos X Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto X X X X X X X X X Feral Pigeon Columba livia X X X X X X X X X X Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo X X X Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus X X X X X X Yellow-legged Gull Larus michahellis X X X X X X X X X X Northern House Martin Delichon urbicum X X X X X X X European Robin Erithacus rubecula X X Woodpigeon Columba palumbus X X X X X X X X X Common Coot Fulica atra X X X Grey Heron Ardea cinerea X X X X X Common Tern Sterna hirundo X Bonnelli's Eagle Aquila fasciata X X X Eurasian Buzzard Buteo buteo X X X X X Common Kestrel Falco tinnunculus X X X X X X X X Eurasian Hobby Falco subbuteo X Eurasian Magpie Pica pica X X X X X X X X Eurasian Jackdaw Corvus monedula X X X X X X X X X Dunnock Prunella modularis X Spanish Sparrow Passer hispaniolensis X X X X X X X X European Greenfinch Chloris chloris X X X Common Linnet Linaria cannabina X X Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus X X X X X X X X Sand Martin Riparia riparia X Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica X X X X X X X X X Willow Warbler Phylloscopus trochilus X Subalpine Warbler Curruca cantillans X X X X Eurasian Wren Troglodytes troglodytes X X X Spotless Starling Spotless Starling X X X X X X X X Common Name Scientific Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sardinian Warbler Curruca melanocephala X X X X
    [Show full text]
  • Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species Are Listed in Order of First Seeing Them ** H = Heard Only
    Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species are listed in order of first seeing them ** H = Heard Only July 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th Mute Swan Cygnus olor X X X X X X X X Whopper Swan Cygnus cygnus X X X X Greylag Goose Anser anser X X X X X Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis X X X Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula X X X X Common Eider Somateria mollissima X X X X X X X X Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula X X X X X X Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator X X X X X Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo X X X X X X X X X X Grey Heron Ardea cinerea X X X X X X X X X Western Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus X X X X White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla X X X X Eurasian Coot Fulica atra X X X X X X X X Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus X X X X X X X Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus X X X X X X X X X X X X European Herring Gull Larus argentatus X X X X X X X X X X X X Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus X X X X X X X X X X X X Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common/Mew Gull Larus canus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Tern Sterna hirundo X X X X X X X X X X X X Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea X X X X X X X Feral Pigeon ( Rock) Columba livia X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Wood Pigeon Columba palumbus X X X X X X X X X X X Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto X X X Common Swift Apus apus X X X X X X X X X X X X Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica X X X X X X X X X X X Common House Martin Delichon urbicum X X X X X X X X White Wagtail Motacilla alba X X
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Conservation Plan Benton Lake National Wildlife
    Glossary accessible—Pertaining to physical access to areas breeding habitat—Environment used by migratory and activities for people of different abilities, es- birds or other animals during the breeding sea- pecially those with physical impairments. son. A.D.—Anno Domini, “in the year of the Lord.” canopy—Layer of foliage, generally the uppermost adaptive resource management (ARM)—The rigorous layer, in a vegetative stand; mid-level or under- application of management, research, and moni- story vegetation in multilayered stands. Canopy toring to gain information and experience neces- closure (also canopy cover) is an estimate of the sary to assess and change management activities. amount of overhead vegetative cover. It is a process that uses feedback from research, CCP—See comprehensive conservation plan. monitoring, and evaluation of management ac- CFR—See Code of Federal Regulations. tions to support or change objectives and strate- CO2—Carbon dioxide. gies at all planning levels. It is also a process in Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)—Codification of which the Service carries out policy decisions the general and permanent rules published in the within a framework of scientifically driven ex- Federal Register by the Executive departments periments to test predictions and assumptions and agencies of the Federal Government. Each inherent in management plans. Analysis of re- volume of the CFR is updated once each calendar sults helps managers decide whether current year. management should continue as is or whether it compact—Montana House bill 717–Bill to Ratify should be modified to achieve desired conditions. Water Rights Compact. alternative—Reasonable way to solve an identi- compatibility determination—See compatible use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds of Wimbledon Common and Putney Heath 2015
    The Birds of Wimbledon Common and Putney Heath 2015 Male Wheatear on the log pile 1 The Birds of Wimbledon Common and Putney Heath 2015 The Birds of Wimbledon Common and Putney Heath 2015 espite coverage on the Common being rather poor again this year, a total of 96 species were D recorded, four more than in 2014. Of these, 45 bred or probably bred, with no doubt the highlight of the year being the successful breeding of a pair of Skylarks on the Plain, the first to do so since 2007. Much credit for this achievement must go to Wildlife & Conservation Officer, Peter Haldane, and his staff, who have persevered over the years to create a suitable and safe habitat for this Red-listed bird. Credit is also due to Chief Executive, Simon Lee, for his valuable cooperation, and indeed to the vast majority of the visiting public, many of whom have displayed a keen interest in the well-being of these iconic birds. Signage on the Plain this year was extended to the two uncut sections during the autumn and winter months, thus affording our migrants and winter-visiting birds a sanctuary in which to feed and shelter safely. Another outstanding high note this year was the Snow Bunting found on the Large Mound in January, a first for the Common since records began in 1974; and yet another first for the Common came in the form of three Whooper Swans at Rushmere in December. There was also a surprising influx of Lesser Spotted Woodpeckers during the spring, a bird that in the previous few years had become an extremely scarce visitor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mouse with a Beak
    LOCAL NATURE A Mouse with a Beak BY ERIC DINERSTEIN Contributing Writer sparrow-like klip-klip emanating from its per unit of weight, the Winter Wren delivers equally undistinguished short bill. If that’s its song with 10 times more power than a ILLUSTRATION BY TRUDY NICHOLSON all there was to the call, my account of this crowing rooster. Contributing Artist creature could pretty much stop here and move on to the next bird. Another fascinating fact about the Winter Wren is that until recently it had one of t frst glance, the diminutive But take a walk if you can in the northern the largest ranges of any bird, stretching Winter Wren is nothing to write forests in spring. Your ears would perk across the northern hemisphere. Now, home about. A plump lump of a bird up and you would become determined geneticists have split this species into three: Acovered in dull dark brown, barred plumage, to seek out the songster that is flling the a Pacifc Wren on the Western coast of this winter visitor is one of our smallest forest with the longest, one of the loudest, North America, the Winter Wren across North American bird species. And then and certainly the richest notes uttered by the rest of our continent, and the Eurasian there is that rather silly-looking short tail, any North American species. Tere on a Wren that ranges from Cornwall, England ofen held in the upright position, as if this branch, announcing, “this is my territory”, to Korea. Interestingly, Europe, Russia, and appendage got stuck in the manufacturing is the creature we nonchalantly pass over the rest of Asia have just this one species of process.
    [Show full text]
  • Natal and Breeding Dispersal in House Wrens (Troglodytes Aedon)
    NATAL AND BREEDING DISPERSAL IN HOUSE WRENS (TROGLODYTES AEDON) NANCY E. DRILLING AND CHARLES F. THOMPSON EcologyGroup, Department of BiologicalSciences, IllinoisState University,Normal, Illinois 61761 USA ABSTRACT.--Westudied the natal and breeding dispersalof yearling and adult HouseWrens (Troglodytesaedon) for 7 yr in central Illinois. The forestedstudy areascontained 910 identical nest boxesplaced in a grid pattern. On average38.1% (n = 643) of the adult malesand 23.3% (n = 1,468) of the adult females present in one year returned the next; 2.8% (n = 6,299) of the nestlingsthat survived to leave the nest returned eachyear. Adult male (median distance = 67 m) and adult female (median = 134 m) breeding dispersalwas lessthan yearling male (median = 607.5 m) and yearling female (median = 674 m) natal dispersal.Females that returned had producedmore offspringthe previousseason than had nonreturningfemales, and femalesthat successfullyproduced at leastone chick in their last nesting attempt of the previousseason moved shorter distances than did unsuccessfulfemales. There were, however, no consistentdifferences between returning and nonreturning femalesin two other measures of reproductivesuccess. Females that were unsuccessfulin their lastbreeding attempt of the previousyear were more likely to be successfulin their next attempt if they moved two or more territoriesthan if they did not move. Reproductivesuccess did not affectthe likelihood that a male would return nor the distancethat he moved.The successof subsequentnesting attemptsby maleswas
    [Show full text]
  • Troglodytes Troglodytes
    Troglodytes troglodytes -- (Linnaeus, 1758) ANIMALIA -- CHORDATA -- AVES -- PASSERIFORMES -- TROGLODYTIDAE Common names: Winter Wren; Wren European Red List Assessment European Red List Status LC -- Least Concern, (IUCN version 3.1) Assessment Information Year published: 2015 Date assessed: 2015-03-31 Assessor(s): BirdLife International Reviewer(s): Symes, A. Compiler(s): Ashpole, J., Burfield, I., Ieronymidou, C., Pople, R., Wheatley, H. & Wright, L. Assessment Rationale European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) In Europe this species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence 10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). The population trend appears to be stable, and hence the species does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (30% decline over ten years or three generations). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern in Europe. Within the EU27 this species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence 10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (30% decline over ten years or three generations). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern in the EU27. Occurrence Countries/Territories of Occurrence Native: Albania; Andorra; Armenia; Austria; Azerbaijan; Belarus; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; Croatia; Cyprus; Czech Republic; Denmark; Faroe Islands (to DK); Estonia; Finland; France; Georgia; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Iceland; Ireland, Rep.
    [Show full text]